ISHM Testbeds and Prototypes (ITP) Project

Similar documents
Exploration Systems Research & Technology

2009 ESMD Space Grant Faculty Project

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

NASA Ground and Launch Systems Processing Technology Area Roadmap

Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity

Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

QUEST Vision for Exploration of Space

Ultra Reliability at NASA

Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program

Global Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

NASA s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs. May 2, 2007

Agenda & Topics for Discussion

JOHNSON SPACE CENTER HOME OF HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION

Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process

Constellation Systems Division

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy

A SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University

The Intel Science and Technology Center for Pervasive Computing

Advanced Space Suit Project (formerly Extravehicular Activity Suit/Portable Life Support System)

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

Big Data Visualization for Planetary Science

The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

NASA Mission Directorates

NASA s Strategy for Enabling the Discovery, Access, and Use of Earth Science Data

NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework

Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

Judith L. Robinson, Ph.D. Associate Director Space Life Sciences Directorate Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas USA

Sparking a New Economy. Canada s Advanced Manufacturing Supercluster

Invocon, Inc. has core competencies in the following areas:

Management Operations Control Applications (MOCA) Mission Update

The Lunar Split Mission: Concepts for Robotically Constructed Lunar Bases

Space Human Factors Engineering Project

NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture

NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Dan Dvorak and Lorraine Fesq Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Jonathan Wilmot NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Exploration Systems. Program Overview. July 15, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.

Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program

Design and Operation of Micro-Gravity Dynamics and Controls Laboratories

Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET)

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration

NASA Research Areas of Interest Released by NASA HQ February 2014

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA TA-12 Roadmap Review: Manufacturing and Cross Cutting

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

Focus Session on Commercial Crew

Credits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization

Platform Independent Launch Vehicle Avionics

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

The PTR Group Capabilities 2014

Changes to DoD and Agency Acquisition Processes to Accelerate Integration of Innovative Technologies

Addressing International Lunar Surface Operations Click to edit Master title style

2018 ASSESS Update. Analysis, Simulation and Systems Engineering Software Strategies

15 th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research

NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway

A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY

Tutorial: The Web of Things

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

"TELSIM: REAL-TIME DYNAMIC TELEMETRY SIMULATION ARCHITECTURE USING COTS COMMAND AND CONTROL MIDDLEWARE"

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Model Based Systems Engineering

Advanced Life Support

TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN

713/

The NASA and LVX System Partnership for Development of Light Communication Technologies

Canadian Activities in Intelligent Robotic Systems - An Overview

The Cooperation of Alcatel Alenia Space Italia and Politecnico di Torino on Space Exploration Scenarios

High Speed, Low Cost Telemetry Access from Space Development Update on Programmable Ultra Lightweight System Adaptable Radio (PULSAR)

Agenda Item No. C-29 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING. Vice Chancellor and Dean of Engineering Director, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station

U.S. Exploration EVA: Architecture and ConOps Overview. NASA-JSC EVA Office/J. Buffington

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Planetary Science Technology Review Panel Final Report Summary

RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

Moon Express 2017 A Private Mission to the

AC : NASA SENIOR DESIGN: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND REUSABLE AVIONICS

CPS Engineering Labs Mini-Courses Smart Cities by Indra Design Centre Spain

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Autonomous Control for Unmanned

Dr. Cynthia Dion-Schwartz Acting Associate Director, SW and Embedded Systems, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E)

Multisensory Based Manipulation Architecture

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

Brief overview of NASA s Human Mars Campaign and some cool New Projects at KSC

23270: AUGMENTED REALITY FOR NAVIGATION AND INFORMATIONAL ADAS. Sergii Bykov Technical Lead Machine Learning 12 Oct 2017

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

Applying Open Architecture Concepts to Mission and Ship Systems

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

Transcription:

ISHM Testbeds and Prototypes (ITP) Project Sensors for Industry Conference Brief Daniel P. Duncavage Project Manager International Space Station Program NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX February 8, 2005 1of 8

The President s Exploration Vision: The fundamental goal of this vision is to advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space exploration program. In support of this goal, the United States will: Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program to explore the solar system and beyond; Extend human presence across the solar system, starting with a human return to the Moon by the year 2020, in preparation for human exploration of Mars and other destinations; Develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human exploration; and Promote international and commercial participation in exploration to further U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests. 2of 8

Objective: To develop and test Integrated System Health Management (ISHM) technologies for use by NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESMD). The International Space Station (ISS) and the Rocket Engine Test Stand (RETS) will be used as systems and data sources. The Project s testbed infrastructure will be directly applicable to ESMD Programs, especially the Crew Exploration Vehicle. The technologies developed may be directly implementable in the ISS Program, improving operations cost and safety. 3of 8

Goals: Test and validate multiple ISHM technology components to TRL 6 using ISS and the RETS environments. Create and test a complete set of interoperability standards for development of ISHM implementations for ESMD systems. Cross-train engineering/operations personnel and ISHM researchers. Products: Software, a number of hardware items (sensors, primarily) and documentation/reports. Customers: ESMD, specifically Explorations Systems Research & Technology ISHM research community International Space Station Program 4of 8

Deliverables: Portable Testbeds (based on ISS and RETS). These Testbeds are primarily virtual and implemented as software and standards. The customers are ESMD and Research. Tested ISHM component technologies (e.g. model based reasoning software). These deliverables may be applied by ESMD and ISS. Interoperability standards. Development of any technology realm depends upon interface standards. The standards that will be created by this project will enable the development of fully capable ISHM suites for Exploration systems, such as Constellation. ESMD and Research are the primary beneficiaries of these deliverables. Prototype ISHM implementations built on the relevant Testbeds. These prototypes serve to prove the veracity of the component technologies as well as provide the first design iteration of implementations which may be applied to the relevant environments (ISS and RETS). Therefore, the customers are ESMD and ISS. Personnel. The Project brings personnel together from both the research and engineering/operations communities, cross-training each in real vehicles and next generation technology. 5of 8

Approach: Development of ISHM technologies requires an infrastructure that delivers multifaceted capabilities to technology developers, including: a. Access to large quantities of data from real flight and ground systems b. Domain experts from the flight and ground systems c. Data interchange and interoperability standards d. Construction and test of full prototype ISHM systems This Project consists of the Testbed (a, b, c) and Prototype Implementations (d). The majority of the research components fall within the Prototypes portion of the Project. The Testbeds will provide to the researchers with Information Distribution Services (serving both telemetry and design data) and access to domain expertise (e.g. ISS engineering and flight control experts). Collaborations with outside teams, such as other ESR&T funded projects, will enhance the technical strength and diversity of the Prototypes. There are currently three such collaborations underway. 6of 8

This diagram is a dataflow-centric view of the architecture. The center column encompasses most of the multipurpose components and the outer columns are primarily Prototypespecific components. Data Sources Telemetry from Vehicle and Simulations Distributed Health Metrics (TEDS/ HEDS) Databases Conventional and Smart Sensors Design Databases (EDMS, PVCS, etc) Sensor, Process & System Knowledge Bases Information Distribution Architecture High Speed Comm Protocols Interoperability Standards Diagnostic Data Server Knowledge Mining Application Analysis Components Information Extraction and Fusion Inference an Decision Making Quality of Service Information Displays External Client Applications (e.g. BAA and ICP) Smart Sensor Algorithms 7of 8

Collaboration: A central point of the Project is the collaboration with other NASA Centers and outside organizations. Core project team: JSC Lead Center, Project Management SSC Lead Science Center ARC, JPL, GRC, KSC, MSFC, Rowan University Formal collaborations: University of Southern California Penn State University Informal collaborations: Carnegie Mellon University West Southern Illinois University, Carbondale USA Honeywell 8of 8