PHY High Level Block Diagrams and First Pass Look at PHY Delays. Avi Kliger, Mark Laubach Broadcom

Similar documents
PROPOSAL FOR PHY SIGNALING PRESENTED BY AVI KLIGER, BROADCOM

IEEE P802.3bn Tutorial E P o C

Topics on Channel Architecture

Baseline Proposal for EPoC PHY Layer

Updates to 802.3bn EPoC Upstream Framing Proposal. Avi Kliger, Leo Montreuil Broadcom

Baseline Proposal for EPoC PHY Layer IEEE 802.3bn EPoC September 2012 AVI KLIGER, BROADCOM LEO MONTREUIL, BROADCOM ED BOYD, BROADCOM

EPoC Downstream Baseline Proposal (PLC material removed for transfer to PLC baseline)

OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal. Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1

EPoC Downstream Pilot Proposal. Christian Pietsch, Qualcomm Avi Kliger, Broadcom

Details on Upstream Pilots and Resource Block Configuration for EPoC

Resource Blocks for EPoC Considerations. Avi Kliger, BZ Shen, Leo Montreuil Broadcom

From Control Multiplexer to Gearbox, How Do We Meet MPCP Jitter Requirement? Jin Zhang Marvell

PHY Link Channel for EPoC TDD mode. Nicola Varanese, Qualcomm

Multiple Downstream Profile Implications. Ed Boyd, Broadcom

SYMBOL SIZE CONSIDERATIONS FOR EPOC BASED OFDM PHY. Avi Kliger, Leo Montreuil, Tom Kolze Broadcom

Downstream Bit Loading Procedure

LDPC FEC PROPOSAL FOR EPOC. Richard S. Prodan Broadcom Corporation

EPON over Coax. Channel Bonding Sub-layer

Editor: this header only appears here to set number 100 and is not to be included.

Channel Model Ad Hoc. Report. Presented by Duane Remein (Huawei)

EPoC Upstream Modulation Profiles Eugene Dai, PhD, Cox Communications Hal Roberts, Calix Networks

Error! No text of specified style in document. Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1 - CNU transmitter output signal characteristics

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /ICCE.2012.

EPON over Coax. RF Spectrum Ad Hoc Status Report. Steve Shellhammer (Qualcomm)

FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION PROPOSAL FOR EPOC PHY LAYER

Wireless LANs IEEE

3GPP Long Term Evolution LTE

An FPGA 1Gbps Wireless Baseband MIMO Transceiver

Coax Resource Allocation & Tone Reordering

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Downstream Synchronization Sequence: Vertical vs Horizontal

Basic idea: divide spectrum into several 528 MHz bands.

Outline / Wireless Networks and Applications Lecture 7: Physical Layer OFDM. Frequency-Selective Radio Channel. How Do We Increase Rates?

[Insert Document Title Here]

DOCSIS 3.1 OFDM Channel Configuration

Are You Ready for DOCSIS 3.1. Presenter: Pete Zarrelli VeEX Field Applications Engineer

1000BASE-RH PHY system simulations

With a lot of material from Rich Nicholls, CTL/RCL and Kurt Sundstrom, of unknown whereabouts

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs)

Feature (Claims) Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4. Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4

IEEE c-00/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Wireless Networks: An Introduction

Canova Tech The Art of Silicon Sculpting

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WIMAX SYSTEM USING CONVOLUTIONAL PRODUCT CODE (CPC)

One Cell Reuse OFDM/TDMA using. broadband wireless access systems

WiMAX Basestation: Software Reuse Using a Resource Pool. Arnon Friedmann SW Product Manager

4x4 Time-Domain MIMO encoder with OFDM Scheme in WIMAX Context

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Initial PHY Layer System Proposal for Sub 11 GHz BWA

Mohammad Hossein Manshaei 1393

Performance Analysis of WiMAX Physical Layer Model using Various Techniques

2 nd Generation OFDM for , Session #11

Experimenting with Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing OFDM Modulation

Investigation on Multiple Antenna Transmission Techniques in Evolved UTRA. OFDM-Based Radio Access in Downlink. Features of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN

Technical Aspects of LTE Part I: OFDM

Homeworx Lessons? What can we learn from the first deployment of OFDMA on HFC? Hal Roberts, Calix

Wireless Communication

Selected answers * Problem set 6

Chapter 3 Introduction to OFDM-Based Systems

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposal for an OFDM-based Air Interface Physical Layer

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING : SYSTEMS EECS 555 DIGITAL COMMUNICATION THEORY

Field Experiments of 2.5 Gbit/s High-Speed Packet Transmission Using MIMO OFDM Broadband Packet Radio Access

Baseline Proposal for 400G/80km. Ilya Lyubomirsky, Jamal Riani, Ben Smith, Sudeep Bhoja, Inphi Corp. Rich Baca, Microsoft Corp.

DOCSIS 1.0 Micro CMTS

Layered Division Multiplexing (LDM) Summary

Performance Evaluation of IEEE STD d Transceiver

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Major Leaps in Evolution of IEEE WLAN Technologies

SourceSync. Exploiting Sender Diversity

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

ATSC 3.0 Physical Layer Overview

Adoption of this document as basis for broadband wireless access PHY

Fundamentals of OFDM Communication Technology

Cisco Remote PHY DS OFDM Channel Configuration

Using Modern Design Tools To Evaluate Complex Communication Systems: A Case Study on QAM, FSK and OFDM Transceiver Design

DOCSIS 3.1 Technischer Überblick

802.11a Hardware Implementation of an a Transmitter

Simulating the WiMAX Physical Layer in Rayleigh Fading Channel

TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. General project hints. Behavioral Model. General project hints, cont. Lecture 5. Required documents Modulation, cont.

Towards an objective for 400 Gb/s for DCI applications

MIMO-LTE A relevant Step towards 4G. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Kaiser CEO mimoon GmbH

IEEE p802.3bn EPoC. Channel Model Ad Hoc committee Baseline Channel Model

This document is based on: W-OFDM Submission to IEEE PHY

IEEE C802.16d-03/24r0. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

JD7105A Base Station Analyzer

Radio Interface and Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced

Lecture 3 Cellular Systems

Fine-grained Channel Access in Wireless LAN. Cristian Petrescu Arvind Jadoo UCL Computer Science 20 th March 2012

3G Evolution HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband Part II

5G Networks Research and Development

Capacity Enhancement in WLAN using

Digital Television Lecture 5

Chapter 4 Investigation of OFDM Synchronization Techniques

SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Access networks In premises networks

Freescale, the Freescale logo, AltiVec, C-5, CodeTEST, CodeWarrior, ColdFire, ColdFire+, C-Ware, the Energy Efficient Solutions logo, Kinetis,

This chapter describes the objective of research work which is covered in the first

1. INTRODUCTION II. SPREADING USING WALSH CODE. International Journal of Advanced Networking & Applications (IJANA) ISSN:

Wireless Networks (PHY)

Transcription:

PHY High Level Block Diagrams and First Pass Look at PHY Delays Avi Kliger, Mark Laubach Broadcom 1

As presented at September 2013 meeting: kliger_3bn_01a_0913.pdf DATA FROM MAC FEC ENCODER RANDMIZER SYMBOL MAPPER TIME AND FREQUENCY INTERLEAVING PILOT INSERTION BIT LOADING SCATTERED PILOT MAP PLC MESSAGES PLC FEC ENCODER RANDMIZER SYMBOL MAPPER PLC PREAMBLE IFFT CYCLIC PREFIX & WINDOWING EPoC Downstream Transmitter Block Diagram (starting point) NOTE: All digital domain 2

Updated Downstream CLT Tx: PCS PMA PMD DATA FROM MAC MAC/PLS PLC MESSAGES RC XGMII 64b/66b 65b ENCODER NCP INSERTIONS DATA DETECTOR FEC ENCODER NCP GENERATION PLC FEC ENCODER SCRAM- BLER SCRAM- BLER SCATTERED PILOT MAP SYMBOL MAPPER SUB-CARRIER CONFIGURATION & BIT LOADING SYMBOL MAPPER TDD MARKERS TIME AND FREQUENCY INTERLEAVING PILOT INSERTION PLC PREAMBLE IFFT CYCLIC PREFIX & WINDOWING Time Stamp EPoC Downstream CLT Transmitter Block Diagram NOTE: All digital domain NOTE: Sub-Carrier Configuration includes sub-carrier use and QAM mapping NOTE: IEEE Vertical Format in kliger_3bn_01_1113_figure.vsd 3

IEEE 802.3 Vertical Normal Form Refer to kliger_3bn_01a_1113.vsd Added: MDI CCDN PMD Functions box, dotted to indicate that these are likely in the vendor / implementation domain details not part of this specification Editors can copy edit as needed. 4

Upstream CNU Tx: PCS PMA PMD MAC/PLS XGMII DATA DETECTOR MARKERS PILOT PATTERN DATA FROM MAC PLC MESSAGES RC 64b/66b 65b ENCODER FEC CODEWORD BUILDER Still needed: 1D-to-2D subcarrier assignment, etc. TDD functionality PLC FEC ENCODER SCRAM- BLER SCRAM- BLER SYMBOL MAPPER SUB-CARRIER CONFIGURATION & BIT LOADING SYMBOL MAPPER INTERLEAVER & OFDM FRAMER PROBE GENERATOR PLC PREAMBLE? PRE-EQ & IFFT CYCLIC PREFIX & WINDOWING EPoC Upstream CNU Transmitter Block Diagram NOTE: All digital domain NOTE: Sub-Carrier Configuration includes sub-carrier use and QAM mapping NOTE: Not converted yet to IEEE 802 Vertical Form 5

First look at PHY delays This is only an initial look: first blush Approximations only More study is needed! PHY delays (latencies) have three main contributors: 1. LDPC FEC encoding and decoding 2. OFDM symbol processing 3. Downstream interleaving There are other PHY delay contributors Starting point: looking at these three. 6

LDPC FEC Encoding and Decoding Proportional to codeword size and line rate E.g. 16200 bits / 1 Gbps = 16.2 usec Processing: 1x for Tx, 2x for Rx For example at above line rate Downstream FEC processing delay: 16.2 + 2 * 32.5 = 48.6 usec Impact Downstream and PLC => constant per provisioning Upstream requires more study due to use of multiple codeword sizes and processing techniques Assuming 16200 codeword size for this first look 7

OFDM Symbol Processing DS CLT Tx Likely 1 Symbol time delay (Tsym) CNU Rx vendor dependent Estimated range min = 6* Tsym, max = 10* Tsym Pilot recovery, channel estimation, timing and synchronization, etc. Example total downstream: Min= (1 + 6) * Tsym = 7 * Tsym Min= (1 + 10) * Tsym = 11 * Tsym 8

OFDM Symbol Processing US CNU Tx Need to build the upstream burst frame Pilots and complementary pilot insertion Based on # of symbols (K) in the frame resource block K likely to be settable from 6 to 18 Other processing adds likely 4 to 8 symbols CLT Rx vendor dependent Collect the RB, process pilots, estimations, etc. Additional, likely based on K plus overheads Min = 6 Tsym, Max = 20 Tsym 9

Downstream Interleaver Straightforward, just based on symbol depth of interleaving being used Min = 0, Max = 10 (example) Example: Min = 0 * Tsym Max = 10 * Tsym 10

Summing It up. Goal < 1048.56 usec (16 bits * 16 usec TQ) Parameter / Item Comment Value Min Value Max DS/US codeword size Just largest CW for now 16200 16200 Downstream line rate Gbps 1.0 1.0 Upstream line rate Gbps 0.5 0.5 Symbol Time (Tsym) 20 usec + 2.5 usec CP 22.5 22.5 K symbols in RB frame 6 symbols 6 6 L Interleaver Depth Default to 0 * Tsym 0 0 Contributors usec usec Downstream FEC ( 1 + 2 ) * 16200 / 1.0 Gbps 48.6 48.6 Upstream FEC ( 1 + 2 ) * 16200 / 0.5 Gbps 97.2 97.2 Downstream OFDM Min 7, max 11 157.5 245.7 CNU Tx OFDM K = 6 + 4 = 10 to K = 6 + 8 = 14 225.0 315.0 CLT Rx OFDM K = 6 + 6 = 12 to K = 6 + 20 = 26 270.0 585.0 DS Interleaving Depth is 0 * Tsym 0 0 Range of delay contributions 798.3 1293.3 11

Summing It up. Goal < 1048.56 usec (16 bits * 16 usec TQ) Parameter / Item Comment Value Min Value Max DS/US codeword size Just largest CW for now 16200 16200 Downstream line rate Gbps 1.0 1.0 Upstream line rate Gbps 0.5 0.5 Symbol Time (Tsym) 40 usec + 2.5 usec CP 42.5 42.5 K symbols in RB frame 6 symbols 6 6 L Interleaver Depth Default to 0 0 0 Contributors Usec usec Downstream FEC ( 1 + 2 ) * 16200 / 1.0 Gbps 48.6 48.6 Upstream FEC ( 1 + 2 ) * 16200 / 0.5 Gbps 97.2 97.2 Downstream OFDM Min 7, max 11 297.5 467.5 CNU Tx OFDM K = 6 + 4 = 10 to K = 6 + 8 = 14 425.0 595.0 CLT Rx OFDM K = 6 + 6 = 12 to K = 6 + 20 = 26 510.0 1105.0 DS Interleaving Depth is 0 * Tsym 0 0 Range of delay contributions 1378.3 2313.3 12

Observations Upstream burst frame size likely needs to be kept to the minimum of 6 symbols 20 usec Tsym+ 2.5 usec CP seems to work. 40 usec + 2.5 usec exceeds the 1048.56 usec goal Could tolerate some DS interleaving with 20 usec symbols, but hopefully depth can be 0 in actual deployment where RTT is an issue Need more in depth look and examination of system issues when RTT 1.0 msec exceeded Don t forget propagation delay time as well as other lesser delay contributors 13

Summary Downstream CLT Tx baseline proposal ready Upstream CNU Transmitter Starting point, work in progress First look at PHY delays presented Further study needed 14

Motion to: Proposed Motion Adopt kliger_3bn_01a_1113.pdf Slide 3 and kliger_3bn_01a_1113_figure.vsd as baseline proposal for downstream Tx. Adopt kliger_3bn_01_1113.pdf Slide 5 as starting point for upstream Tx baseline. Moved: Avi Kliger Second: Rich Prodan 15

THANK YOU 16