Appendix F Noise and Vibration

Similar documents
Virginia Avenue Tunnel (VAT) Reconstruction Noise Analysis Approach

Technical Report Noise and Vibration

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Basin Electric Intertie Noise & Vibration Study and Land Use Assessment

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Standard Octaves and Sound Pressure. The superposition of several independent sound sources produces multifrequency noise: i=1

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

Music 171: Sinusoids. Tamara Smyth, Department of Music, University of California, San Diego (UCSD) January 10, 2019

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

Liddell Coal Operations

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Traffic Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Technical Report for the North Meadows Extension to US 85 and Interstate 25

MUS 302 ENGINEERING SECTION

Date Period Name. Write the term that corresponds to the description. Use each term once. beat

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Appendix B: Noise Study

Liddell Coal Operations

Physics I Notes: Chapter 13 Sound

Noise Impact Analysis

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Annual Noise Monitoring Report

Assessment of rail noise based on generic shape of the pass-by time history

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

Technical Report NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011

Appendix 6-F: Electric and Magnetic Field Study Report

Chapter 12. Preview. Objectives The Production of Sound Waves Frequency of Sound Waves The Doppler Effect. Section 1 Sound Waves

City and Borough of Juneau

Appendix F.4 Noise. 2. Ambient Sound Measurements at Northwest Field, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam (March 2015)... F.4-54

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains

Week 1. Signals & Systems for Speech & Hearing. Sound is a SIGNAL 3. You may find this course demanding! How to get through it:

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Vibration Monitoring for University Of Louisville Belknap Campus Master Plan Seven Locations

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

1. At which position(s) will the child hear the same frequency as that heard by a stationary observer standing next to the whistle?

Liddell Coal Operations

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

2.8 NOISE. Chapter IX 2. Comments and Responses CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Comment

Muswellbrook Coal Company

describe sound as the transmission of energy via longitudinal pressure waves;

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Noise Study Report. Addendum. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. In the Counties of San Bernardino and Los Angeles

APPENDIX C NOISE ANALYSIS METHODS AND CALCULATIONS

Logarithmic Functions

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

CALGARY SOUTHEAST STONEY TRAIL Detailed Design 17th Avenue SE to Macleod Trail South (Hwy 2A) Calgary, Alberta

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011

Week I AUDL Signals & Systems for Speech & Hearing. Sound is a SIGNAL. You may find this course demanding! How to get through it: What is sound?

Fundamentals Of Commercial Doppler Systems

RADIO FREQUENCY NIER REPORT

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

2.0 AVIATION NOISE 2.1 MEASUREMENT OF SOUND

Advanced Dynamic Signal Analysis

Public Hearing on Revisions to Lincoln County Zoning Ordinance

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Ultrasonic Level Detection Technology. ultra-wave

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012

A REPORT OF MONITORING OF AIRCRAFT NOISE FROM STANSTED AIRPORT AT HELIONS BUMPSTEAD, ESSEX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER 2008

A sound wave is introduced into a medium by the vibration of an object. Sound is a longitudinal, mechanical

A STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS AND PREDICTION METHOD OF NOISE FROM CONCRETE RAILWAY BRIDGE

Appendix A Decibels. Definition of db

Bickerdike Allen Partners

Lesson 3 Measurement of sound

Environmental Noise Assessment Pa ia Relief Route Project Pa ia, Maui County, Hawaii

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Section 1 Sound Waves. Chapter 12. Sound Waves. Copyright by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved.

Transcription:

1.1 Wayside Noise Model Methods Wayside noise collectively refers to noise generated by railcars and locomotives (i.e., without including horn noise). The joint lead agencies used noise measurements from past noise studies (Surface Transportation Board 1998a, 1998b) as a basis for the wayside noise level projections. The basic equations used for the wayside noise model are: SELcars = Leqref + 10log(Tpassby) +30log(S/Sref) For locomotives, which can be modeled as moving monopole point sources, the corresponding equation is as follows: SELlocos = SELref + 10log(Nlocos) 10log(S/Sref) The total train sound exposure level is computed by logarithmically adding SELlocos and SELcars DNL100 = SEL + 10log(Nd +10*Nn) 49.4 DNL = DNL100 + 15log(100/D) The parameters that apply to these equations are: SELcars = Sound exposure level of rail cars Leqref = Level equivalent of rail car Tpassby = Train passby time, in seconds S = Train speed, in miles per hour Sref = Reference train speed SELlocos = Sound exposure level of locomotive SELref = Reference sound exposure level of locomotive Nlocos = Number of locomotives Nd = Number of trains during daytime Nn = Number of trains during nighttime D = Distance from tracks, in feet Table C-1 shows the reference wayside noise levels used in this study and Figure C-1 shows the wayside noise frequency spectrum used in the calculations. Table C-1. Reference Wayside Noise Levels Description Average Level (dba) Locomotive SEL (40 mph at 100 feet) a,b 95 Rail car Leq c 82 a To convert kilometers to miles, multiply by 1.6093. b Surface Transportation Board 1998b c Surface Transportation Board CNIC 1998 dba=a-weighted decibels; Leq=level equivalent; and SEL=sound exposure level F-1

Relative SPL Appendix F Wayside Noise Spectrum 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 31 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Frequency (Hz) Figure C-1. Wayside Noise Spectrum 1.2 Horn Noise Model Methods Freight train horn noise levels can vary for a variety of reasons, including the manner in which an engineer sounds the horn. Consequently, it is important to base horn noise reference levels on a large sample size. A substantial amount of horn noise data is available from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Proposed Rule for the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (Federal Railroad Administration 1999), hereafter referred to as the 1999 FRA Draft EIS. FRA data indicate that horn noise levels increase from the point at which the horn is sounded 0.40 kilometer (0.25 mile) from the grade crossing to when it stops sounding at the grade crossing. In the first 0.201 kilometer (0.125 mile) segment, the energy average sound exposure level measured at a distance of 30 meters (100 feet) from the tracks was found to be 107 A-weighted decibels (dba) and 110 dba in the second 0.201 kilometer (0.125 mile) segment. A simplified geographic information system (GIS)-based buffer was used to perform the horn noise contour analysis. Table C-2 shows the reference horn noise levels used in this study. Table C-2. Reference Horn Noise Levels Description Average Level (dba) Horn SEL 1st 0.25 mile a 110 Horn SEL 2nd 0.25 mile a 107 Source: FRA 1999 a To convert kilometers to miles, multiply by 1.6093. dba=a-weighted decibels; Leq=level equivalent; and SEL=sound exposure level F-2

1.3 Vibration Methods 1.3.1 Rail Operations The joint lead agencies based the vibration methods on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) methods (Federal Transit Administration 2006). Vibration level due to train passbys is approximately proportional to V = 20 x log (speed/speed ref ) Published (FTA) ground-borne vibration levels are adjusted for train speed by this equation and distance from the rail line to estimate vibration levels at receptor locations. Two ground-vibration impacts are of general concern: annoyance to humans and damage to buildings. In special cases, activities that are highly sensitive to vibration, such as micro-electronics fabrication facilities, are evaluated separately. Two measurements correspond to human annoyance and building damage for evaluating ground vibration: peak particle velocity and root-mean square velocity. Peak particle velocity (PPV) is the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration signal, measured as a distance per time (such as millimeters or inches per second). This measurement has been used historically to evaluate shock-wave type vibrations from actions like blasting and mining activities, and their relationship to building damage. The root-mean-square velocity is an average or smoothed vibration amplitude, commonly measured over 1-second intervals. It is expressed on a log scale in decibels (VdB) referenced to 0.000001 x 10-6 inch per second and is not to be confused with noise decibels. It is more suitable for addressing human annoyance and characterizing background vibration conditions because it better represents the response time of humans to ground vibration signals. 1.3.2 Rail Construction The joint lead agencies based the construction noise impact assessment on FTA methods (2006) General Assessment construction noise guidelines, shown in Table C-3. Table C-3. FTA General Assessment Construction Noise Guidelines 1-hour Leq (dba) Land Use Day Night Residential 90 80 Commercial 100 100 Industrial 100 100 dba=a-weighted decibels; Leq=level equivalent; The FTA General Assessment for construction noise is used when details of the construction schedule are not known. The method calls for estimating combined noise levels from the two noisiest pieces of construction equipment and determining locations which would exceed the noise guidelines in Table C-3. Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) instantaneous positive or negative peak of a vibration signal, measured as a distance per time. Root-mean-square velocity (VdB) is a measure of ground vibration in decibels used to compare vibration from various sources. F-3

Construction vibration levels are estimated according to the following equation: PPV equipment = PPV ref x (25/D) 1.5 Where PPV equipment is the peak particle velocity in inches per second of the equipment adjusted for distance. PPV ref is the reference vibration level in inches per second at 25 feet. D is the distance from the equipment to the receptor. Estimated construction vibration levels are then compared with building damage criterion. 1.4 Glossary Ambient noise Day-night average sound level Decibel (db) Decibel, A-weighted (dba) Hertz (Hz) Peak particle velocity (PPV) Root-mean-square vibration velocity (VdB) The sum of all noise (from human and naturally occurring sources) at a specific location over a specific time. The energy average of A-weighted decibel sound levels over 24 hours, which includes a 10 decibel adjustment factor for noise between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. to account for the greater sensitivity of most people to noise during the night. The effect of nighttime adjustment is that one nighttime event, such as a train passing by between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., is equivalent to 10 similar events during the daytime. A standard unit for measuring sound pressure levels based on a reference sound pressure of 0.0002 dyne per square centimeter. This is nominally the lowest sound pressure that people can hear. A measure of noise level used to compare noise from various sources. A-weighting approximates the frequency response of the human ear. A unit of frequency equal to one cycle per second. The maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration signal, measured as a distance per unit time (such as millimeters or inches per second). This measurement has been used historically to evaluate shock-wave type vibrations from actions like blasting and mining activities, and their relationship to building damage. An average or smoothed vibration amplitude, commonly measured over 1-second intervals. It is expressed on a log scale in decibels (VdB) referenced to 0.000001 inch per second and is not to be confused with noise decibels. 1.5 References Federal Railroad Administration. 1999. Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Proposed Rule for the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Assessment. Surface Transportation Board. 1998a. Final Environmental Impact Statement No. 980194, Conrail Acquisition (Finance Docket No. 33388) by CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation Inc., and Norfolk Surface Transportation Board. 1998b. for Canadian National and Illinois Central Acquisition. Finance Docket No. 33556. F-4