Proposal for IEEE m Uplink Power Control

Similar documents
Proposal for Uplink MIMO Schemes in IEEE m

Proposal for IEEE m Frame Structure for Single Band Operation

Closed-loop MIMO performance with 8 Tx antennas

Liaison Report from ARIB BWA Subcommittee

Proposal for Constellation Re-arrangement in IR HARQ

Proposal for Incorporating Single-carrier FDMA into m

Physical Structure of UL Feedback Channels

Effectiveness study on inter-system signaling/messaging

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Comment on Unsolicited RNG-RSP in transparent RS System

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Considerations on the Ranging Channels (AWD / )

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Title Propose for Uplink Pilot Design in IEEE m

John Liebetreu and Randall Scwartz

IEEE C802.16e-04/518r1 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/517 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

AAS Maps Format for OFDM

Unveiling Myths about SC-FDMA in TGm

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Consolidation of Uncoordinated Coexistence Mechanisms

A Mixed OFDM Downlink and Single Carrier Uplink for the 2-11 GHz Licensed Bands

IEEE C802.16h-06/011. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16a-02/94r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-04/403 Project. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16d-04/88r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/109. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

UCP simulation: Approach and Initial Results

Survey of Power Control Schemes for LTE Uplink E Tejaswi, Suresh B

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Coverage/Capacity simulations for OFDMA PHY in with ITU-T channel model

Assignments of Pilots for 256 FFT OFDMA mode

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Per Stream Power Control in CQICH Enhanced Allocation IE

Network Management Study Group Closing Plenary Report

IEEE C802.16a-02/46. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Title: LE Task Group Report - Session #45

Relay Combining Hybrid ARQ for j

Proposal for the spectrum mask in IEEE

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16a-02/68. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/022

IEEE C802.16d-04/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Discuss the MAC messages supporting the CSI, such as DCD, DL-MAP etc.

Simulating coexistence between y and h systems in the 3.65 GHz band Scenarios and assumptions

IEEE C802.16h-07/051. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16g-05/039

IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

PHY Proposal IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

IEEE C802.16e-04/420. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Merging CXCC sub-channels 1-4 and CSI sub-channel into one figure

Metrics and Techniques for Evaluation of FEC Systems

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Clarification of H-ARQ Operation with Reduced AAS Private Map

IEEE C802.16h-06/022r1

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Zion Hadad Voice: RunCom Communitcations Ltd. Fax: Hachoma st. Rishon le-zion, Israel

IEEE abc-01/23. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Extended IE format for concurrent transmission of bursts

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-05/059r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/038r2. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Project. Title. Submitted Sources: {se.park,

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Proposed Antenna Radiation Pattern Envelopes for Coexistence Study

IEEE C802.16h-05/001. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C a-01/09. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050

Common PHY & Messages for Neighbor Discovery Using CTS

IEEE C802.16h-05/020. Proposal for credit tokens based co-existence resolution and negotiation protocol

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Framework for Enabling Closed-loop MIMO for OFDMA

David Grandblaise Voice: +33 (0) Motorola Fax: +33 (0)

Changes in ARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 8.2)

IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <

IEEE C802.16h-06/071. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16h-06/050r2

IEEE C802.16h-07/013. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16e-03/ Kwangjae Lim, Choongil Yeh, Hyungsoo Lim and Dongseung Kwon

IEEE C802.16h-07/012. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Adoption of this document as basis for broadband wireless access PHY

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE C802.16maint-07/033

IEEE C802.16e-05/039. Pilot carriers can be used as secondary Fast-feedback channel or secondary UL ACK channel in OFDMA

IEEE C802.16h-05/030r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Voice: Fax:

IEEE C802.16h-07/054r1. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Slides for j (Mobile Multihop Relay) Usage Models

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Interpolation Effects For OFDM Preamble

FBMC for TVWS. Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Working Group Review of Working Document 802.

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Procedure in community Entry of new BS

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < updating the text related to CSI under CX-Frame scheme

IEEE c-01/39. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < The unified TLV encoding for DCD and UCD in OFDMA PHY mode

Transcription:

Proposal for IEEE 802.16m Uplink Power Control Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/613r1 Date Submitted: 2008-07-15 Source: Sophie Vrzic, Mo-Han Fong, Jun Yuan, Robert Novak, Dongsheng Yu, Hosein Nikopourdeilami, Sang-Youb Kim, Kathiravetpillai Sivanesan Nortel Networks *<http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationfaq.html> E-mail: svrzic@nortel.com, mhfong@nortel.com Re: IEEE 802.16m-08/024 Call for Contributions on Project 802.16m System Description Document (SDD), on the topic of UL Power Control Purpose: Adopt the proposal into the IEEE 802.16m System Description Document Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the Source(s) field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>. Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >. 1

Scope This contribution proposes a uplink power control scheme for IEEE 802.16m. The new scheme is an IoT based power control method, which can be combined with FFR to further improve coverage. 2

IEEE 802.16m System Requirements The TGm SRD (IEEE 802.16m-07/002r4) specifies the following requirements: Provide support for FFR (A.2.2) Section 7.1.1 Relative Performance DL cell edge throughput should be greater than 2 times the reference system The proposed scheme is an IoT based power control scheme that can make use of UL FFR zones to improve coverage and overall performance. 3

Overview of Uplink Power Control In IEEE.16e, there is both open loop and closed loop power control. However, in both cases, the MS power is determined without considering the amount of interference that is caused to neighbouring sectors. In order to reduce the amount of interference caused by interfering cell edge mobiles, base stations can use parameters related to loading such as the interference over thermal (IoT) to either increase or decrease the loading in other cells. This method of IoT control can be combined with zone based interference management or FFR to further improve cell edge coverage. With interference management, the bandwidth can be divided into zones where the loading is unrestricted on one of the zones and restricted on the remaining. A coverage gain is obtained when different sectors define a different zone for unrestricted IoT loading. This IoT based power control method can be used with either closed loop or open loop power control. 4

Uplink Power Control (1/2) Open loop power control is used when the MS does not have a dedicated UL feedback channel (e.g. Fast feedback control channel) In open loop power control, the MS determines its transmit power based on an equation that includes both MS and sector specific parameters. The equation is given by P TX = L s + (N+I) + CINR data + Δ BS + Δ MS The value L s is the path loss to the serving sector, N+I is the noise plus interference term that is broadcast by the BS, CINR data is the target CINR and Δ BS and Δ MS are BS and MS specific offsets. In closed loop power control, the UL fast feedback control channel for each MS is power controlled to achieve a target SINR. The MS adjusts its transmit power based on the power control commands that it receives from its serving sector. The MS calculates its power headroom based on the transmit power used for the fast feedback control channel and based on a maximum transmit power. The maximum transmit power can be different for different FFR zones. Both and inner loop and an outer loop can be used to target the mobile s SINR. 5

Uplink Power Control (2/2) In both open and closed loop power control, the MS reports its power headroom via the UL control channel. The power headroom is given by the equation P HR = P max P TX (db). Pmax is the maximum power that the MS is allowed to transmit. The value is different for different MS and can be different for different FFR zones. The BS uses the mobile s power headroom and the received SINR on the UL control channel to assign an MCS. In open loop power control, the SINR is measured on the bandwidth request channel. In closed loop power control, the SINR is measured on the UL fast feedback control channel. The received SINR on the control channel, SINR control, can be the instantaneous SINR or an average SINR measured by the BS. The mobile s power headroom is used to calculate the target SINR for data. The target SINR is given by SINR data = SINR control + P HR (db) The assigned MCS is determined using the target SINR for data. 6

Uplink Power Control with FFR Power Sector 1 Frequency Sector 2 Frequency Sector 3 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Frequency In the above figure, each sector in a cell has an IoT unrestricted zone and two restricted IoT zones. The zones represent logical tones, which are contiguous in the case of an AMC channel and are spread out over the entire bandwidth in the case of a diversity channel. In order to achieve a coverage gain, each sector in a cell uses a different zone for the unrestricted IoT region. Cell edge users can be scheduled in the serving sector s unrestricted IoT zone. Since the neighbouring interfering sectors schedule cell centre users in this zone, the channel condition improves for the cell edge users. 7

Operation of IoT Based Power Control (1/2) Each sector periodically broadcasts the loading threshold for each IoT zone. There can be one or more IoT controlled zones (FFR zones). The loading threshold can be adapted to target a specific interference over thermal (IoT) value. A mobile reports its power headroom on each zone by taking into account the other sector s loading threshold. The power headroom is given by the equation PHR = P max P TX The value P max is determined from the loading threshold of non-serving sectors. The value P TX is the mobile s transmit power when transmitting either the fast feedback control channel or a bandwidth request. 8

Operation of IoT Based Power Control (2/2) The mobile periodically measures the path loss to the other sectors in its active list. The estimated received power to the interfering sector is given by P P L RX, i = max If an interfering sector reports a loading threshold of I thresh,k for zone k then the following condition must be satisfied I thresh, k > PRX, i If the above condition is violated then the mobile adjusts its reported power headroom on zone k using the following equations. Δ P P k = max, k HR, k P RX, i = = P P I max max, k i thresh, k Δ k P TX 9

Performance Comparison 60 50 Coverage (kbps) 40 30 20 10 0 1500 2000 2500 3000 Capacity (kbps) FPC IoT Based PC The IoT based power control method achieves a higher capacity and improved coverage compared with the fractional power control method (FPC). The improved performance is due to a smaller IoT variance compared with the FPC method. For FPC the variance is between 1.6 and 3.6 db For IoT based PC the variance < 1 db 10

Summary The proposed uplink power control scheme can be used with either closed loop or open loop power control. Closed loop power control is used with the mobile has been assigned an UL fast feedback control channel. Open loop power control is used when the mobile does not have a dedicated UL control channel. The new scheme controls the amount of interference generated to neighbouring BS and can be used with or without FFR. The IoT based method significantly improves both capacity and coverage compared with the FPC method. 11

Proposed Text for SDD Section 11.x UL Power Control [Add content of slide 5 to this section] Section 11.x.1 UL Power Control with IoT Load Control [Add content of slides 6, 7 to this section] Section 11.x.2 UL Power Control and FFR [Add content of slide 8 to this section] Section 11.x.3 Operation of IoT Based Power Control [Add content of slides 9 and 10 to this section] 12