IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

Attorneys for Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770

Case 1:18-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv TWP-MPB Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv JAM Document 1 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. :

Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future. June 12, 2018

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

MAY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND SANDRA EVANS, Plaintiff, VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY 1 Hayden Drive Petersburg, VA 23806

Yee ) and A.V. Jewelry Export-Import, Ltd. ( AV Jewelry ) (collectively Plaintiffs ), for their

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan. Petitioner INDEX No against-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:18-cv D Document 1 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

Plaintiff, Defendants. undersigned counsel, for his Complaint against defendants Richard Prince ( Mr. Prince ),

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

defendants, including HSBC, Isaac Franco, Ken Cayre, Joseph Dwek and Yeshuah, LLC, filed

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/17 Page 1 of 14

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016

Courthouse News Service

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

You are hereby summoned and required to answer the Complaint in this action, a copy of

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM

Case 2:15-cv JLR Document 8 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 21

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF PICKENS )

14:"LCA/Estate"), do. ay , 14. lit. by its undersigned attorneys, Andrews Kurth LLP, alleges as follows:

This contract is for services and products related to a photography shoot (hereafter Shoot ) to take place at the following time and place.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv ML Document 194 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Cross-Complainant Western National Construction ("Western") in this action.

Case 2:05-cv JCJ Document 13 Filed 12/27/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10

Richard M. Zielinski. Director. Accolades. Boston:

IN THE UNITED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V E R I F I E D C O M P L A I N T

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Radio Tower Networks, LLC ( Plaintiff or RTN ), by and through its attorneys, files this Complaint against Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC. ( Defendant or Oncor ) for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,321,573 ( the 573 Patent ) and 6,690,937 ( the 937 Patent ). PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement under Title 35 of the United States Code. Plaintiff is seeking damages. 2. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal Question) and 1338(a) (Patents) because this is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the United States patent statutes. 3. Plaintiff is a Texas limited liability company with its office located at 101 E. Park Blvd., Suite 600, Plano, TX 75074. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a Delaware corporation with a principal office located at 1616 Woodall Rodgers Fwy., Dallas, Texas 75202. This Court has PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 1

personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant has committed, and continues to commit, acts of infringement in this District, has conducted business in this District, and/or has engaged in continuous and systematic activities in this District. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant s instrumentalities that are alleged herein to infringe were and continue to be used, imported, offered for sale, and/or sold in this District. VENUE 6. On information and belief, venue is proper in the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1400(b). Acts of infringement are occurring in this District. And, Defendant has a regular and established place of business in this District. On information and belief, Defendant has other regular and established places of business within this District. COUNT I (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 7,321,573) 7. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 through 6 herein by reference. 8. This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States and, in particular, under 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq. 9. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the 573 Patent with sole rights to enforce the 573 patent and sue infringers. 10. A copy of the 573 Patent, titled Radio and Data Network System, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 11. The 573 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 12. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims, including at least Claims 1 of the 573 Patent by using radio and data PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 2

network systems, and components for such systems, which are covered by one or more claims of the 573 Patent. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the 573 Patent directly in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 13. Defendant uses radio and data networking systems, including, without limitation, the Ericsson EDACS Narrowband system (including its components) and any similar components and systems ( Product ), which infringe at least Claim 1 of the 573 Patent. On information and belief, the Product is marketed under the name Ericsson EDACS Narrowband system. Defendant use EDACS Narrowband Networked sites to connect two-way radio communications in a network with a hub and tower that can communicate with one or more radios at other towers via the hub. Defendant uses this system for communication regarding power distribution in North Texas. This is a Wide-Area system that covers numerous counties in North Texas with many sites. Defendant s multi-site radio communication system is a communication network system that communicates data to a user. Certain aspects of this element are illustrated on the webpage at: https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. 14. The Product includes a radio. For example, each site in the multi-site radio communications systems is in communication with and includes one or more two-way radios. Certain aspects of this element are illustrated on the webpage at: https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. 15. Radios used in the system are operatively adapted to transmit on a data channel and a control channel and to selectively alternate between transmitting on the data channel and the control channel. The Ericsson EDACS Narrowband system (trunked system) uses a 4800 baud control channel and is a trunked system that has a data channel and a control channel. 16. The Product includes a data collection unit. For example, the electric meter PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 3

devices have data collection units (e.g., for collecting usage data) and radio transmitters that are operatively adapted to communicate with other radios in the network. 17. The Product has multiple towers, including a first tower having a defined first coverage area and capable of communication with source radios when the radios are in the coverage area of the first tower. Defendant has sites in many different counties, each designed to communicate with source radios in the respective area. 18. The Product has and/or utilizes a hub and a computer network, and the hub communicates with the first tower and with the computer network. For example, the Product includes EDACS Narrowband Networked sites, which allows source radios at a first tower to communicate with two-way radios connected to a second tower. See https://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/edacs_networked. The EDACS network is similar to other trunking systems that allow networked sites. The "system" as a whole is interconnected allowing a wider geographic coverage area without subscribers (users) having to adjust their individual radios. The movement from one site's area coverage to another is seamless to the user. EDACS networks can either be implemented in either EDACS Standard (Wide) or EDACS Narrowband. See https://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/edacs_networked. 19. The Product s data collection unit, radio, towers and hub so configured so that data from the collection unit is transmittable by the radio to the first tower when the radio is in said first coverage area, is transmittable from the first tower to the hub, and is accessible to a user via the computer network. The Product s components link the towers and the local hub so that a source radio within the coverage area of one tower can communicate with one or more two-way radios at a second tower via the hub. 20. Defendant s actions complained of herein will continue unless Defendant is PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 4

enjoined by this court. 21. Defendant s actions complained of herein are causing irreparable harm and monetary damage to Plaintiff and will continue to do so unless and until Defendant is enjoined and restrained by this Court. 22. Plaintiff is in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287. COUNT II (INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,690,937) 23. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 through 22 herein by reference. 24. This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States and, in particular, under 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq. 25. Plaintiff is the owner by assignment of the 937 Patent with sole rights to enforce the 893 Patent and sue infringers. Exhibit B. 26. A copy of the 937 Patent, titled Radio Network System, is attached hereto as 27. The 937 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 28. Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or more claims, including at least Claims 1 and 24 of the 937 Patent by making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering for sale radio network systems and components for such systems covered by one or more claims of the 937 Patent. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the 937 Patent directly in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 29. Regarding Claim 1, Defendant uses radio network systems, including, without limitation, the Oncor Energy s EDACS Narrowband Network system (including its components) and any similar components and systems ( Product ), which infringe at least Claims 1 and 24 of PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 5

the 937 Patent. On information and belief, these products are marketed under the names Oncor Energy. Defendant use EDACS Narrowband Networked sites to connect two-way radio communications in a network with a radio and tower that can communicate with one or more radio at other towers. Defendant uses this system for communication regarding power distribution in North Texas. This is a Wide-Area system that covers numerous counties in North Texas with many sites. 30. The Product s multi-site radio communication system is a communication network system. Defendant uses EDACS Narrowband Networked sites to connect two-way radio communications in a network. See https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. Defendant s radio network systems link the towers so that the radio can communicate with one or more radios at other towers via the hub. 31. The Product includes at least two two-way radios. Each site in the multi-site radio communications systems are in communication with and include two or more two-way radios. See https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. 32. The Product includes at least one source radio. See https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. 33. The Product includes multiple towers, including a first tower having a defined first coverage area and capable of communication with source radios when the radios are in the coverage area of the first tower. For example, Defendant has sites in many different counties, each designed to communicate with source radios in the particular area. 34. Defendant has multiple towers, including a second tower having a defined second coverage area and capable of communication with two or more two-way radios when the radios are in the coverage area of the second tower. PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 6

35. The Product has and/or utilizes a hub and a computer network, and the hub communicates with the first tower and with the computer network. For example, the Product includes EDACS Narrowband Networked sites, which allows source radios at a first tower to communicate with two-way radios connected to a second tower. See https://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/edacs_networked. The EDACS network is similar to other trunking systems that allow networked sites. The "system" as a whole is interconnected allowing a wider geographic coverage area without subscribers (users) having to adjust their individual radios. The movement from one site's area coverage to another is seamless to the user. EDACS networks can either be implemented in either EDACS Standard (Wide) or EDACS Narrowband. See https://wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/edacs_networked. 36. Defendant uses multiple towers and hub(s) configured to link the towers and the local hub(s) so that a source radio within the coverage area of one tower can communicate with one or more two-way radios at a second tower via the hub. Thus, the first tower, second tower, and local hub are configured that a signal from a source radio when the source radio is in the first coverage area may be received by the first tower and communicated to the local hub. The signal may also be communicated from the local hub to a second tower, and communicated from the second tower to at least two of the two-way radios at substantially the same time when those radios are in the second coverage area. 37. Regarding Claim 24, the Product includes a third tower which communicates with the local hub and has a defined third coverage area. See https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=1466. The first, second, and third towers are PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 7

configured and arranged such that communications with the first tower are transmitted to both the second and third towers at substantially the same time. 38. Defendant s actions complained of herein will continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this court. 39. Defendant s actions complained of herein are causing irreparable harm and monetary damage to Plaintiff and will continue to do so unless and until Defendant is enjoined and restrained by this Court. 40. Plaintiff is in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff asks the Court to: (a) Enter judgment for Plaintiff on this Complaint on all causes of action asserted herein; (b) Award Plaintiff past and future damages, costs, and expenses resulting from Defendant s infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284; (c) (d) Award Plaintiff pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs; That this case be declared exceptional and Plaintiff be awarded its costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys fees in this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; and (e) Award Plaintiff such further relief to which the Court finds Plaintiff entitled under law or equity. PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 8

Dated: November 8, 2018 Respectfully submitted, /s/jay Johnson JAY JOHNSON State Bar No. 24067322 D. BRADLEY KIZZIA State Bar No. 11547550 KIZZIA JOHNSON, PLLC 1910 Pacific Ave., Suite 13000 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 451-0164 Fax: (214) 451-0165 jay@kjpllc.com bkizzia@kjpllc.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 9

EXHIBIT A PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 10

EXHIBIT B PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., LLC PAGE 11