Perspective of Eastern Global Satellite Navigation Systems

Similar documents
New Signal Structures for BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

King AbdulAziz University. Faculty of Environmental Design. Geomatics Department. Mobile GIS GEOM 427. Lecture 3

BeiDou Next Generation Signal Design and Expected Performance

Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator Prof. Talat Ahmad Vice-Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia Delhi

Status of COMPASS/BeiDou Development

Challenges and Solutions for GPS Receiver Test

Decoding Galileo and Compass

BeiDou Space Service Volume Parameters and its Performance

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM (GNSS) RECEIVER. B.Tech Thesis Report

Tracking and Analysis of IRNSS Satellites by Using IRNSS Receiver in STK Simulation

Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Signal Structure

Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS)

Monitoring Station for GNSS and SBAS

Assessment of GNSS Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Monitoring Using the Multi-constellation GPStation-6 Receiver

Precise Point Positioning with BeiDou

Benefits of amulti-gnss Receiver inaninterference Environment

Lecture-1 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO GPS

Nigerian Communications Satellite Ltd. (NIGCOMSAT)

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

Developments in Satellite Navigation and Wireless Spectrum

Comprehensive Study of GNSS Systems

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS (GNSS) ECE 2526E Tuesday, 24 April 2018

Acquisition and Tracking of IRNSS Receiver on MATLAB and Xilinx

The Indian Regional Navigation. First Position Fix with IRNSS. Successful Proof-of-Concept Demonstration

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

TEST YOUR SATELLITE NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE ON YOUR ANDROID DEVICE GLOSSARY

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) GPS Serves Over 400 Million Users Today. GPS is used throughout our society

GPS (Introduction) References. Terms

2 INTRODUCTION TO GNSS REFLECTOMERY

Supplement to. Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) L E C T U R E. Zuzana Bělinová. TELEMATIC SYSTEMS AND THEIR DESIGN part Systems Lecture 5

Future GNSS: Improved Signals and Constellations

Benefits of combining systems The Receiver s Perspective Dr Philip G Mattos

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM * Measuring of low-level emissions from space stations at monitoring earth stations using noise reduction techniques

Opportunistic Vehicular Networks by Satellite Links for Safety Applications

Operation and Development of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

1. Discuss in detail the Design Consideration of a Satellite Communication Systems. [16]

The last 25 years - GPS to multi-gnss: from a military tool to the most widely used civilian positioning solution

GNSS Technologies. GNSS Acquisition Dr. Zahidul Bhuiyan Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

Intro to GNSS & Teseo-LIV3F Module for IoT Positioning

Universal Front End for Software GNSS Receiver

The topic we are going to see in this unit, the global positioning system, is not directly related with the computer networks we use everyday, but it

Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System

ORBITAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PRESENT AND FUTURE TENDS

INDIAN REGIONAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM

Field experience with future GNSS ranging signals (a review). A.Simsky, J.-M. Sleewaegen, W. De Wilde Septentrio, Belgium

Introduction to Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Module: 1

Proceedings of Al-Azhar Engineering 7 th International Conference Cairo, April 7-10, 2003.

Signal Structures for Satellite-Based Navigation: Past, Present, and Future*

Performance Evaluation of the Effect of QZS (Quasi-zenith Satellite) on Precise Positioning

Report of the Working Group B: Enhancement of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Services Performance

RNSSs Positioning in the Asia-Oceania Region

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS. Knowing where and when

TIME TRANSFER EXPERIMENT BY TCE ON THE ETS-VIII SATELLITE

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Satellite Communications. Chapter 9

Compass-M1 Broadcast Codes and Their Application to Acquisition and Tracking

High Precision Applications with BeiDou

Satellite Navigation Principle and performance of GPS receivers

Global Navigation Satellite System and Augmentation

GPS Time Synchronization with World-Class Accuracy using a Few Selected Satellites

Fundamentals of GPS Navigation

An Industry View on Realistic Benefits for High Precision GNSS Applications due to GNSS Modernisation The Future of High Precision GNSS

ICG WG-B Achievements on Interoperable GNSS Space Service Volume (SSV) November, 2016 Sochi, Russian Federation

t =1 Transmitter #2 Figure 1-1 One Way Ranging Schematic

3-9 High Accuracy Clock (HAC)

GNSS Modernisation and Its Effect on Surveying

Establishment of Regional Navigation Satellite System Utilizing Quasi-Zenith Satellite System

Universal Acquisition and Tracking Apparatus for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Signals: Research Patent Introduction (RPI)

Low Noise Amplifier Selection for Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System

GNSS: orbits, signals, and methods

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BO.1834*

Testing of the Interference Immunity of the GNSS Receiver for UAVs and Drones

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Characteristics and protection criteria for non-geostationary mobile-satellite service systems operating in the band

Initial Results of IRNSS Standalone and Hybrid Operations

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite (QZS) on GPS Positioning

Where Next for GNSS?

Research Article BeiDou Satellites Assistant Determination by Receiving Other GNSS Downlink Signals

SPS Gold Code Generation and Implementation for IRNSS User Receiver

Understanding GPS/GNSS

Fugro Marinestar Improvements

Test Solutions for Simulating Realistic GNSS Scenarios

Worst-Case GPS Constellation for Testing Navigation at Geosynchronous Orbit for GOES-R

Optimal Pulsing Schemes for Galileo Pseudolite Signals

GBAS FOR ATCO. June 2017

Performance Evaluation of Differential Global Navigation Satellite System with RTK Corrections

RECEIVER DEVELOPMENT, SIGNALS, CODES AND INTERFERENCE

Evaluation of C/N 0 estimators performance for GNSS receivers

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

BeiDou: Bring the World and China to Your Doorstep

Current status of Quasi-Zenith Satellite System. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency QZSS Project Team

Resection. We can measure direction in the real world! Lecture 10: Position Determination. Resection Example: Isola, Slovenia. Professor Keith Clarke

GNSS Signal Structures

Analysis on GNSS Receiver with the Principles of Signal and Information

A coordination methodology for radionavigation-satellite service inter-system interference estimation

EUROPEAN GNSS (GALILEO) INITIAL SERVICES NAVIGATION SOLUTIONS POWERED BY E U R O P E OPEN SERVICE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Satellite-based positioning (II)

Transcription:

POSTER 2015, PRAGUE MAY 14 1 Perspective of Eastern Global Satellite Navigation Systems Jiří SVATOŇ Dept. of Radioengineering, Czech Technical University, Technická 2, 166 27 Praha, Czech Republic svatoji2@fel.cvut.cz Abstract. Accurate positioning is a strategic information. Beside of American GPS and Russian Glonass another countries on east are developing own satellite navigation systems. The Chinese BeiDou and Indian IRNSS are potentially most interesting systems for us. Although the first plans for an independent Chinese satellite navigation system could be dated in an end of previous century first satellites were launched after 2007 and its first signal specification was publicized in 2011. Very interesting is Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System IRNSS. Satellites were launched since 2013 and its signal specification is known since half of year 2014. IRNSS specifies the first public signal out of L-band as a first GNSS systems. Our contribution describes our experience with these systems and with a first reception of satellite navigation system signal in S-band. Keywords GNSS, IRNSS, BeiDou 2, Compass, S-band, acquisition. 1. Introduction Multi-frequency and multi-constellation reception of a different independent systems is a current trend in satellite navigation receiver s development. Accuracy is improved due a higher number of satellites on the sky [1]. Multiconstellation receiver is more reliable in compare with a GPS only, frequency diversity is a protection against a jamming. Existing GNSS systems are traditional application of L-band. Usage of an additional band for the Radio Navigation Satellite Service (RNSS) purpose has been considered since 1998. The first ideas were connected with the development of the European navigation system Galileo but has not been used yet. S-band has been used for a first regional generation of BeiDou since 2000, was allocated to the GNSS purpose in 2003 and has been used for purpose of IRNSS since 2013. We are able to observe some satellites from its constellations. We describes our experience with BeiDou 2 (which specifies signals in L-band only) and with reception of IRNSS signal in L and S-band in our contribution. The second paragraph of our contribution describes BeiDou 2 and IRNSS properties and parameters for their observation in a part of Central Europe. The third paragraph is dedicated to the description of our experimental platform for the S-band signal reception of IRNSS and for results presentation. The fourth paragraph is a conclusion. 2. New satellite navigation systems The next two satellite navigation systems, BeiDou 2 and IRNSS has been on the scene since 2007, 2013 respectively. Both were built for a regional coverage initially. They use a different geostationary or called inclined-geostationary satellites orbits besides of medium orbit for a regional coverage. So it s the most important difference against a conventional GPS or Glonass MEO only constellation. Both systems are specified below. 2.1 BeiDou 2 China has been used first generation of own regional navigation system since 2000. This system uses 2491.75 MHz frequency. First satellite of second generation for a Global coverage system was launched in 2007. This generation BeiDou 2 was called as Compass for some time. Full operational capability constellation consists of 35 satellites (Tab. 2.). Twenty-seven satellites will be on Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), five on geostationary (GEO) and three on inclined-geostationary (IGSO is a GSO orbit with non-zero inclination). Current constellation in year 2015 consists of fifteen satellites. Most of them were launched from 2010 to 2012. No satellites were launched in 2013 and 2014. This can be explained by preparations for launch of new series of satellites from third generation, which is scheduled for launch from 2015. Signal Carrier Chip rate Modulation name [MHZ] [Mchip/s] type B1 1561,098 2,046 QPSK B1-2 1589,742 2,046 QPSK B2 1207,140 10,23 QPSK B3 1268,52 10,23 QPSK B1-BOC 1575,42 1,023 MBOC(6,1,1/11) B2-BOC 1207,14 5,115 BOC(10,5) B3-BOC 1268,52 2,5575 BOC(15,2.5) L5 1176,45 10,23 QPSK Tab. 1. BeiDou 2 signals plan

2 J. SVATOŇ, PERSPECTIVE OF EASTERN GLOBAL SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS A big amount of signals were planned (Tab. 1.) but official B1 signal specification was publicized in December 2011 [2]. Reception on B1 and then on B2 carrier frequency was confirmed on our department in 2012 [3]. Official B2 signal specification for was publicized later in December 2013 [4]. Longitude [ E] Launch M1 MEO April 13, 2007 M2 MEO out of order M3 MEO April 29, 2012 M4 MEO April 29, 2012 M5 MEO September, 2012 M6 MEO September, 2012 G1 140 January, 2010 G2 21 April, 2009 G3 110 June, 2010 G4 160 October, 2010 G5 59 February, 2012 IGSO1 120 July, 2010 IGSO2 120 December, 2010 IGSO3 120 April, 2011 equation (1). A PRN code C SPS is similar to the Gold code and is chipped at 1.023 Mcps with 1 ms period. The Navigation message D SPS is modulo 2 added to data which are transmitted by 50 symbols per second rate. c sps SSPS t CSPS i DSPS i rectt t it, c, sps (1) i The main difference on reception in S-band is a higher propagation loss in compare with L-band. The Tab. 4. specifies the minimum received power level of a signal at the Earth s surface (0 dbi RHCP antenna is used). The power of the IRNSS L5 signal is almost comparable with similar GPS signals, but the signal in the S-band is about 4 db weaker than the signals usually received in the L-band [6]. Signals in both bands were experimentally received. The next two satellites are to be released in early 2015 (March and April). The complete full operational capability constellation of seven satellites is scheduled to be in the orbits by 2016. The three satellites at the GEO orbit will be located at 32.5ºE, 83º E and 131.5º E. Four IGSO satellites will cross the equator on 55º E and 111.75º A (two in each plane). The satellite lifespan is scheduled for 10 years. The weight of the satellite is around 1400 kg and its solar panels supply it with power of about 1660 Watts. IGSO4 92 July, 2011 IGSO5 95 December, 2011 Tab. 2. BeiDou 2 satellites constellation in 2015. Position with commercial receiver on B1 frequency was determined on antenna on faculty roof in 2014. Position error was estimated to 22 m. 2.2 Indian Regional Navigation System Second is Indian IRNSS. The IRNSS is expected to determine the position more accurately than 20 m in the Primary Service Area. The Primary Service Area is bounded by the 1500 km distant the India border. The Extended Service Area is also defined and is bounded from 50 to 30 N and from 30 to 130 E. Its European part exceeds the Turkey and Ukraine areas. Our experience from Central Europe is described in third paragraph. The first IRNSS space vehicle was launched in 2013 and first three satellites from its seven satellites constellation (Tab. 3. and Fig. 1.) were launched by the end of 2014. The IRNSS Interface Control Document (ICD) was officially published in June 2014 in its first version [5]. This ICD defines two carrier frequencies: the L5 (1176.45 MHz with 24 MHz bandwidth) [6] and the IRNSS-S (2492.028 MHz with a 16.5 MHz bandwidth). Two different services are defined: the Standard Positioning Service (SPS) and the Restricted Service (RS). Each carrier is modulated by three signals: by the SPS - BPSK (1), the RS - Data Channel BOC (5,2) and the Pilot Channel BOC (5,2). The SPS signal is defined by the Fig. 1. IRNSS FOC constellation Earth plot Longitude [ E] Inclin. [ ] RAAN [ ] Tab. 3. IRNSS FOC constellation. Launch 1A 55.0 29 (±2) 135 July, 2013 1B 55.0 29 (±2) 310 April, 2014 1C 83.0 ± 5 274 October,2014 1D 111.75 29 (±2) 135? March, 2015 1E 111.75 29 (±2) 310? April, 2015 1F 32.5 ± 5 270 By end 2016 1G 131.5 ± 5 270 By end 2016

POSTER 2015, PRAGUE MAY 14 3 From a current constellation a geostationary satellite 1C is observable from Prague at low elevation from 2 to 9. The first two IGSO satellites 1A and 1B reaches good elevation of up to 49 and at least one of them is always observable from our laboratory in Prague. The remaining satellites 1D and 1E will be also observable from our location in a the future, but for a shorter period of the day. Only 1F will be visible from Central Europe from the future GEO satellites 1F and 1G. Nevertheless it means that constellation would be able to determine a 2D position during the whole day in Central Europe from the spring 2015 [7]. Fig. 2. IRNSS S-band experimental reception system 3. Signal reception and acquisition 3.1 L-band reception L-band B1(I) BeiDou 2 signals were confirmed by post-processing acquisition on complex envelop samples sampled by a software defined radio receiver in 2012. Then the B1 and B2 signals were tracked real-time by the same receiver later in 2012. The compliance of broadcasted signals in both band B1(I) and B2(I) was confirmed [3] before official publication of B2 specification. IRNSS L5 signal was acquired by a post-processing method too in autumn 2014. Ranging code generator structure was confirmed. Methods and results are presented below and in a Fig. 4. 3.2 S-band reception For IRNSS S-Band signal acquisition the postprocessing method was chosen again. But different frequency band (16 MHz bandwidth around central frequency 2492.092 MHz) requires a specific radio-front end. The Rohde and Schwarz FSQ 3 signal analyzer was used as an acquisition system for signal samples. The 44 MHz sampling frequency and the 50 MHz resolution filter were used. The analyzer uses three inter-frequency stages. The first one is for a mirror reception cancellation. The digitalization is implemented in the third stage with the help of a cascade of interpolators and decimators. Signal in S-band is little bit weaker than in L-band (Tab. 4.) so better front-end parts are required. IRNSS central frequency is 2492.092 MHz, so specific SAW filter was utilized [7]. Own extra-low noise amplifier [9] was utilized too. Block schematic picture you find on a Fig. 2 and its frequency characteristic on Fig. 3. Signal Modulation Min. P R [dbw] Tab. 4. IRNSS received power on Earth surface. Max. P R [dbw] L5 - SPS BPSK (1) -159.0-154.0 S - SPS BPSK (1) -162.3-157.3 Fig. 3. S-band front-end frequency characteristic 3.3 L-band reception The signal was sampled via the analyser. The ambiguity function of the signal acquisition was computed with the equation (2) respectively (3). Where R(τ, f d) is the crosscorrelation function between the received signal s(t) with Doppler frequency f d and PRN code replica C SPS. The functions F and F -1 (9), (10) are Fourier transformation and the inverse-fourier transformations, respectively [8]. * j2 fd d SPS 1 j2 fdt R, f s t C t e dt (2) jt F : S( ) s t e dt (4) 1 : ( ) (5) 2 1 jt F s t S e d R, f F F s( t) e F C ( t) (3) d The presented functions are results of a non-coherent integration process. An integration time 22 ms was used in the L5-band and 360 ms in the S-band. The result presented in Fig. 4. are acquisitions of all three IRNSS satellites in both bands. Signals were received with C/N 0 from 30 to 39 db. The S-band signals have worse C/N 0 because of the lower gain of the analogue parts and due to the lower received power level. This means that the longer integration time is required. Geostationary satellites signals have better C/N 0 than the satellites on inclined-geostationary orbits. SPS *

4 J. SVATOŇ, PERSPECTIVE OF EASTERN GLOBAL SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS L5 IRNSS 1A L5 IRNSS 1B L5 IRNSS 1C S IRNSS 1A S IRNSS 1B S IRNSS 1C Fig. 4. IRNSS L-band and S-band satellite signal acquisition function 4. Conclusion Both new eastern satellite navigation systems were experimentally received. BeiDou 2 is able to be used for navigation even in Central Europe. Three IRNSS satellites were received in L and S-band. Our contribution is based mainly on the new experience with the experimental reception of the signal in the S-band in the area of Central Europe. Quality front-end with good filtration system for the suppression of near-out-band interferences (Wi-Fi) and low noise figure amplifiers are required for the S-band reception due to the lower received power level and C/N 0 at the antenna output. We expect that IRNSS will be probably useable for 2D positioning in central part of Europe in the first half of the year 2015, however with the poor DOP. But the main advantage of this system is evaluation of reception in new band. Acknowledgements The submitted paper has arisen during the work on the project which has been financially supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic under grant No. TE01020186. This work was also supported by the Student Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS14/150/OHK3/2T/13. References [1] SVATOŇ, J., POPP, J. '"Multi-constellation GNSS systems, Signals and Receivers," In Proceedings of the 9th International Student Conference on Electrical Engineering POSTER 2014. Prague (Czech Republic), 2014, p. 1 5. [2] BeiDou 2 Signal in Space ICD, version v1.0. China Satellite Navigation office, 2011. [3] KACMARIK, P. et al., Dual-frequency Tracking of Compass Signals: Compass Implementation to the Witch Navigator Receiver, Xian (China), 2012 [4] BeiDou 2 Signal in Space ICD, version v2.0. China Satellite Navigation office, 2013. [5] IRNSS Signal In Space ICD. Version 1.0. Bangalore, 2014DOBEŠ, J. et al. 2014. Using the Sensitivity Analysis of the Noise Spectral Density for Practical Circuit Design. 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). p. 1676-1679. [6] Thombre, S. et al. 2014. Tracking IRNSS Satellites. InsideGNSS. online: http://www.insidegnss.com/node/4279. [7] SVATON, J., VEJRAŽKA, F., Experiments with Reception of IRNSS Satellite Navigation Signals in the S and C Frequency Bands. In Proceedings of the 11th International conference TRANSNAV 2015. Gdynia (Poland), 2015, p. 1 7. [8] BRADFORD, P.W. SPILKER, J. and ENGE, P. 2009. Global positioning system: theory and applications. AIAA Washington DC. [9] DOBEŠ, J. et al. Using the Sensitivity Analysis of the Noise Spectral Density for Practical Circuit Design. 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2014, p. 1676-1679.

POSTER 2015, PRAGUE MAY 14 5 About Authors... Jiří SVATOŇ was born in Žďár nad Sázavou (Czech republic). He is a post gradual student of CTU in Prague at Department of Radioengineering. Have a MSc. From wireless communications. He is interested in construction of radio systems and signal processing. His PhD studies are devoted to study and optimization of multi-constellation receivers.