Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Similar documents
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N. WPANs) (WPANs( January doc.: IEEE 802.

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Abstract: [Final proposal for d, that is for the low cost and low power consumption WPAN.]

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs(

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Study Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs(

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Research in Ultra Wide Band(UWB) Wireless Communications

PSSS proposal Parallel reuse of 2.4 GHz PHY for the sub-1-ghz bands

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

doc.: IEEE September, 2009

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

PSSS proposal Parallel reuse of 2.4 GHz PHY for the sub-1-ghz bands. DWA Wireless GmbH, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)

Project: IEEE P Study Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs(

Wireless Personal Area Networks

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks. LB34 Ranging comment resolution

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

UWB for Sensor Networks:

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING : SYSTEMS EECS 555 DIGITAL COMMUNICATION THEORY

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

DS-UWB signal generator for RAKE receiver with optimize selection of pulse width

Differential Pulse Position Modulation for 5 GHz

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Adoption of this document as basis for broadband wireless access PHY

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

A CMOS UWB Transmitter for Intra/Inter-chip Wireless Communication

Multi-Band OFDM: Achieving High Speed Wireless Communications. Dr. Anuj Batra Member Group Technical Staff DSP Solutions R&D Center Texas Instruments

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /ICCE.2012.

September, doc.: IEEE k

Wireless Networks: An Introduction

September 23, 2009 Doc: IEEE

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

PSSS proposal Parallel reuse of 2.4 GHz PHY for the sub-1-ghz bands. PSSS mode for more even chiprates, simpler filter, and 250 kbit/s in 868 MHz

A Comparison of ZigBee/ vs. Ultra-Wideband Transmission Techniques for Wireless Fire and Intrusion Detectors

Abstract: [Response to Call for Preliminary proposal in IEEE d Task Group. Our proposal focuses on low cost and low power consumption.

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs)

September 24, 2009 Doc: IEEE

UWB Technology for WSN Applications

January doc.: thz_THz_Wireless_Communications_Challenges_and_Opportunities

DSRC using OFDM for roadside-vehicle communication systems

IEEE C /008. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

Outline. Introduction 2/2. Introduction 1/2. Paper presentation Ultra-Portable Devices. Introduction. System Design for Ultra-Low Power.

Overview. Measurement of Ultra-Wideband Wireless Channels

The Measurement and Characterisation of Ultra Wide-Band (UWB) Intentionally Radiated Signals

IEEE g

Lee Kyung-Kuk

Abstract: [Response to Call for Preliminary proposal in IEEE d Task Group. Our proposal focuses on low cost and low power consumption.

September, Submission. September, 1998

Comment Resolution for the MR-O-QPSK PHY

Millimeter-Wave System for High Data Rate Indoor Communications

CDMA Principle and Measurement

Applied to Wireless Sensor Networks. Objectives

Experimental Evaluation Scheme of UWB Antenna Performance

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Performance Analysis of Different Ultra Wideband Modulation Schemes in the Presence of Multipath

IEEE c-00/40. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

Elham Torabi Supervisor: Dr. Robert Schober

PROPOSAL FOR PHY SIGNALING PRESENTED BY AVI KLIGER, BROADCOM

Performance Analysis of Rake Receivers in IR UWB System

Realization of Peak Frequency Efficiency of 50 Bit/Second/Hz Using OFDM MIMO Multiplexing with MLD Based Signal Detection

November doc.: IEEE dep Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

IEEE SUPPLEMENT TO IEEE STANDARD FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Initial PHY Layer System Proposal for Sub 11 GHz BWA

PSSS proposal Parallel reuse of 2.4 GHz PHY for the sub-1-ghz bands

Lecture 1 - September Title 26, Ultra Wide Band Communications

Re: [] Abstract: [Introduction of VLCC, Visible Light Communication Physical Layer Specification Version 1.0. ]

Improved PHR coding of the MR-O-QPSK PHY

Application of pulse compression technique to generate IEEE a-compliant UWB IR pulse with increased energy per bit

Ultra Wideband Direct Chaotic Communications for IEEE a Standard

Pulse-Based Ultra-Wideband Transmitters for Digital Communication

UWB Applications and Technologies

Cognitive Ultra Wideband Radio

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

FPGA Implementation of Gaussian Multicarrier. Receiver with Iterative. Interference. Canceller. Tokyo Institute of Technology

Channel-based Optimization of Transmit-Receive Parameters for Accurate Ranging in UWB Sensor Networks

5 GHz, U-NII Band, L-PPM. Physical Layer Specification

Getting Started Guide

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Transcription:

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N (WPANs( WPANs) Title: [Pulsed DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB for Various Applications] Date Submitted: [January 2005] Source: [Huan-Bang Li(1), Kenichi Takizawa(1), Kamya Yekeh Yazdandoost(1), Akifumi Kasamatsu(1), Shigenobu Sasaki(1), Shinsuke Hara(1), Makoto Itami(1), Tetsushi Ikegami(1), Ryuji Kohno(1), Toshiaki Sakane(2), Kiyohito Tokuda(3)] Company [(1)National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), (2)Fujitsu Limited, (3)Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.] E-Mail: [lee@nict.go.jp] Re: [Response to Call For Proposal by IEEE 802.15.4a] Abstract [This document has been submitted for an official proposal in January 2005. Two possible technologies of direct-sequence UWB(DS-UWB) and chirp-signal UWB(CS-UWB) are combined to be optimized for various application of IEEE802.15.4a. Pulsed DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB is proposed and investigated in performance on BER, ranging resolution, complexity, power consumption, SOP and so on. The proposed system is matched with requirements. ] Purpose: [Providing technical contributions for standardization by IEEE 802.15.4a. ] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Slide 1

Pulsed DS-UWB with Optional CS-UWB for Various Applications Huan-Bang Li, Kenichi Takizawa, Kamya Yekeh Yazdandoost, Akifumi Kasamatsu, Shigenobu Sasaki, Shinsuke Hara, Makoto Itami, Tetsushi Ikegami, and Ryuji Kohno National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan Toshiaki Sakane Fujitsu Limited Kiyohito Tokuda Oki Electric Industry Co. Ltd. Slide 2

Outline Requirements of TG4a Proposed system: Pulsed DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB (Chirp Signaling UWB) 1. General advantages of DS-UWB and CS-UWB 2. Proposed DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB 3. Performance examples 4. Multiple access and SOP 5. PHY frame structure 6. Ranging issue 7. Complexity and power consumption 8. Technical feasibility Concluding remarks Slide 3

Primary Technical Requirements for 15.4a Low complexity, low cost, and low power consumption. Precision ranging by PHY --- tens of centimeters. Communication distance is ~30m (can be extended). Better robustness and mobility than 802.15.4. Low bit rate (individual link) >= 1 kbps. High bit rate (aggregated) >= 1 Mbps. Slide 4

Aims of the Proposal By using DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB, the proposed system is conscientiously designed so that it can be easily customized and generally used for various applications, while keeping low complexity with low power consumption. Meet all requirements of 15.4a. Slide 5

1. General Advantages of DS-UWB and CS-UWB Both DS-UWB and CS-UWB are available for High frequency efficiency Uniform use of frequency within the band High robustness against noise and multipath Correlated processing High compatibility with other existing systems Low interference level High feasibility for SOP Use of DS codes or chirp pulses Slide 6

Modulation/Demodulation for DS-UWB Modulation. Gaussian Filter LO f c =4.096GHz Demodulation. LPF 1 or 2-bit ADC LO f c =4.096GHz Slide 7

Chirp/De-chirp Processing for CS-UWB Chirp can be done by passing a pulse signal through a DDL. Amplitude Time Pulse signal De-chirp is realized by doing correlated processing. Amplitude Frequency Time Time Frequency T B: 3-dB bandwidth of chirp T: time interval of chirp Correlated processing Correlator output Time shift[s] Slide 8

Comparison between DS-UWB and CS-UWB ++ good, + fair DS-UWB CS-UWB Low complexity Peak-toaverage ratio Effect of SOP Ranging resolution ++ + + ++ + ++ ++ + Slide 9

2. Proposed DS-UWB With Optional CS-UWB Transceiver structures and waveforms Default and optional pulse shaping Frequency band Link budget Scalability and optional SS operation Advantages Proposed UWB antenna Slide 10

Pulsed DS-UWB System Proposal Spectrum Spreading: Direct sequence (DS) with spreading sequence of variable lengths. In option, additional chirp signaling (CS-UWB). Pulse Shaping: Gaussian monocycle and optionally variable pulse shapes with SSA (Soft Spectrum Adaptation#). Frequency Band: 500MHz or 2GHz in bandwidth over 3.1-10.6GHz. In option, 2.4GHz ISM band. Data Modulation: BPSK or others. Low bit rate (individual link) >= 1 kbps. High bit rate (aggregated) >= 1 Mbps. Channel Coding & Decoding: (24, 12) extended Golay code. In option, CIDD (combined iterative demapping/decoding#) Slide 11 (# see 15-03-0334-05-003a)

Outstanding Features of the Proposal High capacity for SOP Use of independent DS codes or chirp pulses Use of combined DS codes and chirp pulses Multiple selectivity for FFD and RFD as well as for various Customization Chirp vs. Non chirp High bit rate vs. Low bit rate Optional SSA vs. Gaussian monocycle Interoperability Simplified structure from high rate DS-UWB of 15.3a Slide 12

Overall Block Diagram With Optional CS Comm. data Ranging data Transmitter (24,12)-Golay encoder Receiver BPSK Spreading BW = 500MHz or 2GHz Pulse shaping Local oscillator CHIRP GA Pre-Select Filter LNA De- CHIRP LPF LPF GA GA 1 or 2-bit ADC 1 or 2-bit ADC Decision/ FEC decoder Comm. data Ranging data Ranging processing Additional circuits to DS-UWB as an option I Q Local oscillator Sync. Time base Peak detection Calculation Slide 13

Block diagram Without Optional CS Comm. data Ranging data Transmitter (24,12)-Golay encoder Receiver BPSK Pulse waveform: Variable(SSA) BW = 500MHz or 2GHz Spreading Pulse shaping Local oscillator GA Pre-Select Filter LNA LPF LPF GA GA 1 or 2-bit ADC 1 or 2-bit ADC Decision/ FEC decoder Comm. data Ranging data Ranging processing I Q Local oscillator Sync. Time base Peak detection Calculation Slide 14

Waveforms With & Without Optional CS Gaussian pulse Gaussian pulse Gaussian pulse Gaussian pulse Gaussian pulse time (24,12)-Golay encoder BPSK Spreading Pulse shaping CHIRP GA Local oscillator linear-chirp linear-chirp linear-chirp linear-chirp linear-chirp time Slide 15

Pulse shaping Gaussian monocycle is default. Easy implementation of transceiver. The ratio of chip rate to carrier frequency is an integer. Drawback is less efficiency in utilizing FCC mask. Optional soft spectrum adaptation (SSA; see 15-03-0334-05-003a). Adaptive spectrum by considering trade-off between performance and complexity/cost. Slide 16

Frequency Band We consider two operating bandwidths of UWB. #1: BW=2GHz, and #2: BW=500MHz. Both are selected within 3.1-10.6 GHz frequency band. In addition, 2.4 GHz ISM band is also considered as an option. EIRP emission level (dbm) -41.3-61.3 #1 #2 0.5 G 3.1G 5.1G Slide 17 FCC limit Frequency 10.6G

DS-UWB Link Budget (BW=2GHz) Parameter Data rate (Rb) Modulation Coding rate (R) Raw Symbol rate (Rs) Pulse duration (Tp) Spreading code length (Ns) Chip rate (Rc) Chip duration Value Value 1 1024 BPSK 1/2 2 2048 0.662 1024 64 2.048 131.072 488.3 7.63 Notes (kbps) Coherent detection (24,12)-Extended Golay Hard-decision decoding Rs=Rb/R (ksymbol/s) (ns) =Rs*Ns (MHz) =1/Rc (nsec) Parameter Distance (d) Peak payload bit rate (Rb) Average Tx power (Pt) Tx antenna gain (Gt) Frequency Band Geometric center frequency (fc) Path loss @ 1m (L1) Path loss @ d m (Ld) Rx antenna gain (Gr) Rx power (Pr) Average noise power per bit (N) Value Value 30 10 1 1024-10.5 0 3.1-5.1 3.98 44.43 29.54 20.00 0-90.47-80.93-144.00-113.90 Unit m kbps dbm dbi GHz GHz db db dbi dbm dbm Rx Noise Figure (Nf) 7.00 db Average noise power per bit (Pn) -137.00-106.90 dbm Minimum required Eb/N0 (S) 6.25 db Implementation loss (I) 3.00 db Link Margin 43.28 22.72 db Min. Rx Sensitivity Level -127.75-97.65 dbm Slide 18

CS-UWB Link Budget (BW=2GHz) Parameter Data rate (Rb) Modulation Coding rate (R) Raw Symbol rate (Rs) Value 1 2 BPSK 1/2 Value 1024 2048 Notes (kbps) Coherent detection (24,12)-Extended Golay Hard-decision decoding Rs=Rb/R (ksymbol/s) Parameter Distance (d) Peak payload bit rate (Rb) Average Tx power (Pt) Tx antenna gain (Gt) Frequency band Geometric center frequency (fc) Value Value 30 10 1 1024-8.89 0 3.1-5.1 3.98 Unit m kbps dbm dbi GHz GHz Chirp signal duration (Tc) Spreading code length (Ns) Chip rate (Rc) Chip duration 1024 2.048 488.3 100 4 8.192 122.1 (ns) =Rs*Ns (MHz) =1/Rc (nsec) Path loss @ 1m (L1) Path loss @ d m (Ld) Rx antenna gain (Gr) Rx power (Pr) Average noise power per bit (N) 44.43 29.54 20.00 0-90.47-80.93-144.00-113.90 db db dbi dbm dbm Rx Noise figure (Nf) 7.00 db Average noise power per bit (Pn) -137.00-106.90 dbm Minimum required Eb/N0 (S) 6.25 db Implementation loss (I) 3.50 db The items given in red characters have different values from those of DS Link Margin Min. Rx Sensitivity Level 44.39-127.25 23.83-97.15 db dbm Slide 19

DS-UWB Link Budget (BW=500MHz) Parameter Data rate (Rb) Modulation Coding rate (R) Raw Symbol rate (Rs) Pulse duration (Tp) Value Value 1 1024 BPSK 1/2 2 2048 2.649 2.649 Notes (kbps) Coherent detection (24,12)-Extended Golay Hard-decision decoding Rs=Rb/R (ksymbol/s) (ns) Parameter Distance (d) Peak payload bit rate (Rb) Average Tx power (Pt) Tx antenna gain (Gt) Frequency band Geometric center frequency (fc) Path loss @ 1m (L1) Value Value 30 10 1 1024-16.9 0 3.85-4.35 4.09 44.68 Unit m kbps dbm dbi GHz GHz db Spreading code length (Ns) Chip rate (Rc) Chip duration 1024 2.048 488.3 64 131.072 7.63 =Rs*Ns (MHz) =1/Rc (nsec) Path loss @ d m (Ld) Rx antenna gain (Gr) Rx power (Pr) Average noise power per bit (N) 29.54-91.12-144.00 0 20.00-81.58-114.00 db dbi dbm dbm Rx Noise figure (Nf) 7.00 db Average noise power per bit (Pn) -137.00-106.90 dbm Minimum required Eb/N0 (S) 6.25 db Implementation loss (I) 3.00 db Link Margin 36.63 16.07 db Min. Rx Sensitivity Level -127.75-97.65 dbm Slide 20

CS-UWB Link Budget (BW=500MHz) Parameter Data rate (Rb) Modulation Coding rate (R) Raw Symbol rate (Rs) Value 1 2 BPSK 1/2 Value 1024 2048 Notes (kbps) Coherent detection (24,12)-Extended Golay Hard-decision decoding Rs=Rb/R (ksymbol/s) Parameter Distance (d) Peak payload bit rate (Rb) Average Tx power (Pt) Tx antenna gain (Gt) Frequency band Geometric center frequency (fc) Value Value 30 10 1 1024-15.38 0 3.85 4.35 4.09 Unit m kbps dbm dbi GHz GHz Chirp signal duration (Tc) Spreading code length (Ns) Chip rate (Rc) Chip duration 1024 2.048 488.3 25 4 8.192 122.1 (ns) =Rs*Ns (MHz) =1/Rc (nsec) Path loss @ 1m (L1) Path loss @ d m (Ld) Rx antenna gain (Gr) Rx power (Pr) Average noise power per bit (N) 44.68 29.54 20.00 0-89.60-80.06-144.00-114.0 db db dbi dbm dbm Rx Noise figure (Nf) 7.00 db Average noise power per bit (Pn) -137.00-106.90 dbm Minimum required Eb/N0 (S) 6.25 db Implementation loss (I) 3.50 db The items given in red characters have different values from those of DS Link Margin Min. Rx Sensitivity Level 37.65-127.25 17.09-97.15 db dbm Slide 21

Scalability With DS Lengths Data rate (kbps) Raw Symbol rate (ksps) DS Code length (chip) Chip rate (Mcps) Link margin at 10m (db) Notes DS-UWB 1 2 1024 2.048 52.8 0.662 (ns) pulse width 16 32 1024 32.768 40.8 32 64 1024 65.536 37.8 128 256 256 65.536 31.8 256 512 256 131.072 28.7 1024 2048 64 131.072 22.7 2048 4096 64 131.072 19.7 Optional, use 4BOK 4096 8192 64 131.072 16.7 Optional, use 16BOK CS-UWB (optional) 1 2 1024 2.048 53.9 100 (ns) chirp duration 16 32 64 2.048 41.9 100 (ns) chirp duration 1024 2048 4 8.192 23.8 100 (ns) chirp duration Slide 22

Optional SS Operation & Pulse Shaping These optional operations provide choice for FFD and RFD, and allow energy-rich codes to obtain better QoS and/or higher throughput. Transmitter side Receiver side systematic FEC MOD parity 1 BPSK/DBPSK Selection parity 2 M s sequences spreading M sequence p shapes Pulse Selection generator Gaussian/SSA/Chirp M p M s Pulse generator Pulse Pulse spreading Pulse Pulse generator generator generator generator sequence Maximum Likelihood Detector (MLD) FEC DEC Slide 23

Advantages of Pulsed DS-UWB with Optional CS-UWB The proposed system can be widely customized for various applications but less complex with low power consumption. Low complexity Simple ADC (1 or 2-bit) is enough. Optional CS-UWB can be carried out with simple chirp and de-chirp circuits in addition to the basic DS-UWB (see system diagram). Variable Transmission Chirped DS-UWB signals can be demodulated by both FFD and RFD. Variable data rates is realized by selecting the length of DS codes. High robustness against noise, multipath, and interference Correlated processing provides robustness against noise and multipath. Reduction of interference from other nodes, e.g. SOP or from other operating systems. Interoperability & Coexistence Simplified structure from high rate DS-UWB of 15.3a may enable active coexistence. Slide 24

UWB Antenna Very small antenna with excellent radiation pattern. Antenna size is smaller than SD memory card size. Radiation Pattern Y 17 mm 0.7 mm 19 mm Z X Substrate: Silicon Patch: Copper Slide 25

Antenna Characteristics VSWR <= 2 in total band and nearly linear gain. 3.1GHz 5.1GHz 3.1GHz 5.1GHz VSWR Gain (dbi) VSWR=2.00 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Slide 26

3. Performance Examples Performance under AWGN channel Performance with 15.4a channel models Anti-interference performance (IEEE802.11a and MB-OFDM) Slide 27

Simulation results (Single link, AWGN) 1.0 One Packet includes 32 bytes. 10-1 PER 10-2 CS-UWB BW=2GHz DS-UWB BW=2GHz CS-UWB BW=500MHz DS-UWB BW=500MHz 10-3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eb/N0 [db] Slide 28

Simulation results (Single link, AWGN) BER 1.0 10-1 10-2 CS-UWB BW=2GHz DS-UWB BW=2GHz CS-UWB BW=500MHz DS-UWB BW=500MHz 10-3 10-4 10-5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eb/N0 [db] Slide 29

Average PER Average PER January 2005 10-1 10-2 10-1 10-2 Slide 30 Performance With 15.4a CMs CM8 CM5 CM8 CM5 CM1 CM1 BW=2GHz 10-3 20 30 40 50 60 70 Distance [m] BW=500MHz 10-3 20 30 40 50 60 70 Distance [m] DS-UWB Data rate: 1kbps (nominal) Modulation: BPSK Pulse shape: Gaussian monocycle Spreading code: 1024 chips ADC: 1Gs and 1bit Channel models CM1: Indoor residential LOS CM5: Outdoor LOS CM8: Industrial environments NLOS

Interference Models Considered IEEE802.11a Center frequency: 5.18 GHz Emission power: 15 dbm Antenna gain: 0 dbi MB-OFDM Frequency band: Group 1, lower three bands Emission power: -41.3dBm*528MHz*Duty cycle Antenna gain: 0 dbi Slide 31

Interference Evaluation Using Minimum Criteria Interference models Tolerable distance to achieve PER<1% IEEE802.11a BW = 2GHz MB-OFDM BW = 2GHz Eb/N0 = inf. Eb/N0 = 10 db 0.52 m 0.80 m Eb/N0 = inf. 0.012 Eb/N0 = 10 db 0.022 Eb/N0 = inf. 0.104 BW = 500MHz Eb/N0 = 10 db 0.115 UWB: Propagation distance = 1m. Data rate = 2 Mbps, FEC off. BW = 2 GHz, fc = 4.1 GHz. BW = 500 MHz, fc = 3.35 GHz. Slide 32

4. Multiple Access and SOP Multiple access method Simulation results Slide 33

Multiple Access Method For SOP DS-UWB Use different DS codes (and/or different frequency sub bands for BW = 500MHz). CS-UWB (in option) Use different chirped pulses or combination of DS codes and chirped pulses. Slide 34

Simulation block diagram for SOP Desired transmitter Channel Undesired transmitter A Channel Receiver Devices of Other piconets Undesired transmitter B Channel Undesired transmitter C Channel Devices in the same piconet Slide 35

Simulation results for SOP 10-0 DS-UWB CS-UWB SNR=5dB BER 10-1 SIR=-5 db 10-2 SIR=0 db 10-3 Number of SOP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Slide 36

Cross correlation coefficient DS-UWB CS-UWB Slide 37

5. PHY Frame Structure Frame Format PHY header payload Slide 38

PHY Frame Format Preamble Start Delimiter PHY Header PSDU DS Spreading DS-UWB or CS-UWB 1024 kbps (BPSK) PHY-SAP Payload Bit Rates 1,16, 32, 128, 256, 1024kbps (BPSK) 2048kbs (4BOK) 4096kbps(16BOK) Coding rate =1 Coding rate =1/2 Slide 39

Payload of PHY Header We can use the spreading type filed bit in PHY header as an indicator to show which spreading scheme is employed in the payload, DS-UWB or CS-UWB. PHY Header Data Rate Spreading Length UWB Type Modulation Type PSDU Length 3bits 2bits 1bit 2bits 8bits 0: DS-UWB 1: CS-UWB Slide 40

6. Ranging Issue Ranging circuit Ranging period Ranging accuracy Slide 41

MAC Ranging Processing with TOA (Option) Tx data/ranging data Coder Pulse Generator Tx Power Amp Tx Chirp Filter ANT Tx-Chirp Filter Cont Rx-Chirp Filter Cont (Option) LNA (Option) T R T/R Switch BPF Rx data Decoder Comparator Rx Chirp Filter Calculate Ranging Ranging Circuit Tx/Rx SW Cont Slide 42

Period of Ranging with TOA Period of ranging Long ranging period 250 sec Short ranging period 15 msec The ranging period is decided by referring to the superframe structure of 15.4. Slide 43

Ranging Accuracy with TOA Ranging precision depends on the bandwidth used. Using a simple TOA, DS-UWB provides better precision than CS-UWB in principle. DS-UWB CS-UWB Bandwidth (GHz) 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 Ranging resolution (cm) 19.86 79.47 30 120 Slide 44

7. Complexity/Power Consumption Assuming standard 0.13µm CMOS technology With intermittent operation in analog section Component Gate Counts (kgate) Area (mm 2 ) Communication Power @1kbps* (mw) Power @1024kbps (mw) Power@slow Cycle (mw) Ranging Power@fast Cycle (mw) Tx and Rx Mix. Center Freq. Gen. Tx Amp. LNA GA ADC (2-bit) Sync and Clock Tx Digital Rx Digital Total - - - - - - - 10 50 60 10.2 The consumption power will be dominated by Communication, if Communication and Ranging are operated simultaneously. Slide 45 2.5 0.06 0.3 2.5 (Analog) 0.36 (Digital) 1.2 2 0.8 1 1 1.8 2 0.1 0.3 12 20 8 10 10 18 20 4 20 122 1.2 12 2 20 0.8 8 1 10 1 10 1.8 18 1 10 0.1 4 0.2 10 9.0 102

8. Technical Feasibility Power Management Manufacturability Time to market Slide 46

Power Management Mode Functions similar to those of 15.4 are available, Sleep Wake up Poll Slide 47

Technical Feasibility Manufacturability Proposed system can be manufactured right now by conventional standard CMOS technology such as 0.13µm. Basics of the system have been demonstrated in DS- UWB 802.15.3a proposal. Time to market There is no difficulty on research and technique. Time for design and product is needed. Regulation may be a factor. Slide 48

Concluding Remarks The proposed DS-UWB with optional CS-UWB can be widely customized and perform excellent for various applications in 15.4a. The proposed system can be widely customized for different applications with pre-optimized sets of parameters. Full and reduced function devices (FFD and RFD) can make choice for each of the following pairs of parameters: chirped or non-chirped DS-UWB, default Gaussian pulse or SSA, and, high or low data rate, etc.. Feasibility and scalability are guaranteed both. Low complexity, low cost, and low power consumption. Variable data rate and multiple dimensions for SOP. Robustness against multipath and interference. Communication and ranging requirements in 15.4a are both satisfied for a wide range of applications. Excellent performance with 15.4a channel models is confirmed and more results will come. Slide 49