United States Patent (19) Morris

Similar documents
:2: E. 33% ment decreases. Consequently, the first stage switching

III. I. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,121,014. Huang

United States Patent (19) Price, Jr.

(12) United States Patent

HHHHHH. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,079,455. McCafferty et al. tor to provide a negative feedback path for charging the

United States Patent (19) Wrathal

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,534,804 Woo (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 1996

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7, B2. Drottar (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007

United States Patent (19) Ohta

in-s-he Gua (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,388,499 B1 (45) Date of Patent: May 14, 2002 Vddint : SFF LSOUT Tien et al.

United States Patent (19) 11) 4,163,947

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1. KM (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 24, 2013

us/ (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1 (19) United States / 112 / 108 Frederick et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,970,124 B1. Patterson (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 29, 2005

the sy (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1 (19) United States (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 29, 2015 slope Zero-CIOSSing

United States Patent (19) Harnden

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,337,722 B1

United States Patent (19)

Vdd 200-N. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1. (19) United States GND. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 20, Sun et al.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

United States Patent (19) Archibald

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

III. United States Patent (19) Ashe. 5,495,245 Feb. 27, OTHER PUBLICATIONS Grebene, Bipolar and MOS Analog Integrated Circuit

United States Patent (19) Onuki et al.

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,512,817. Nagaraj (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 30, 1996

11 Patent Number: 5,874,830 Baker (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 23, ADAPTIVELY BAISED VOLTAGE OTHER PUBLICATIONS

4,695,748 Sep. 22, 1987

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,940,338 B2. Kizaki et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 6, 2005

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1. ROZen et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 6, 2006

United States Patent (19) Schnetzka et al.

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,009,450 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,080,983 B2

USOO513828OA. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,138,280. Gingrich et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 11, 1992

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,766,692 B1

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,826,092 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1. Luo et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 8, 2006

USOO A. United States Patent (19) (11 Patent Number: 5,422,590 Coffman et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jun. 6, 1995

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

(51) Int. Cl... HoH 316 trolling a state of conduction of AC current between the

(12) United States Patent

III IIIIHIIII. United States Patent 19 Mo. Timing & WIN. Control Circuit. 11 Patent Number: 5,512, Date of Patent: Apr.

LOADVD. United States Patent (19) Zommer. 5,063,307 Nov. 5, (11 Patent Number: (45) Date of Patent:

Publication number: A2. Int. CI.5: H01 L 29/ Meadowridge Drive Garland, Texas 75044(US)

United States Patent (19)

USOO A. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,272,450 Wisherd (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 21, 1993

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,449,544 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US B2. Chokkalingam et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 1, 2009

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Mazin et al.

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,892,398 Candy (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 6, 1999

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1. FOSS (43) Pub. Date: May 27, 2010

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 5,621,555 Park (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 15, 1997 LLP 57)

United States Patent (19) Glennon et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,549,050 B1

United States Patent (19) Nilssen

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 6,538,473 B2 Baker (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 25, 2003

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2

II I III. United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation,

Alexander (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 17, 1992

III. United States Patent (19) Hutter et al. N- BURED AYER P SUBSTRATE. A vertical PNP structure for use in a merged bipolar/cmos

United States Patent (19) Smith et al.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

(12) United States Patent Baker

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,226,021 B1. Anderson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007

twcc United States Patent (19) Schwarz et al. 11) 4,439,743 45) Mar. 27, Claims, 9 Drawing Figures

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,554,072 B2

A///X 2. N N-14. NetNNNNNNN N. / Et EY / E \ \ (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1. (19) United States

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,843,234 B2

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19 11 Patent Number: 5,592,073 Redlich 45) Date of Patent: Jan. 7, 1997

United States Patent (19) Curcio

6,064,277 A * 5/2000 Gilbert 331/117 R 6,867,658 Bl * 3/2005 Sibrai et al 331/185 6,927,643 B2 * 8/2005 Lazarescu et al. 331/186. * cited by examiner

United States Patent (9) Rossetti

4,994,874 Feb. 19, 1991

United States Patent (19) Watanabe

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

72 4/6-4-7 AGENT. Sept. 10, 1963 R. P. SCHNEIDER ETAL 3,103,617. Filed May 6, 1958 PHLP E. SHAFER WOLTAGE REGULATION WITH TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION

U.S.C. 154(b) by 21 days. (21) Appl. No.: 09/784,724 (22) Filed: Feb. 15, 2001 (51) Int. Cl... HO3F 3/45 330/300 'YG) T -- L.

Tokyo, Japan (21) Appl. No.: 952, Filed: Sep. 29, 1992 (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Oct. 1, 1991 JP Japan

VG1P I MlP EN 20 MZPHFVGZP. mm mm m nuunnyyo I]! [(1816 [[Lllllllllllllllllll. VG1N MIN \gp L2 M2N [ vg2n V1.. V2. 5,508,639 Apr.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,104 B1

United States Patent (19) Rousseau et al.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

M3 d. (12) United States Patent US 7,317,435 B2. Jan. 8, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: (75) Inventor: Wei-Chieh Hsueh, Tainan (TW) T GND

(10) Patent No.: US 8.436,591 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,560,992 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,353,344 B1

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) Morris 54 CMOS INPUT BUFFER WITH HIGH SPEED AND LOW POWER 75) Inventor: Bernard L. Morris, Allentown, Pa. 73) Assignee: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J. 21 Appl. No.: 806,890 22) Filed: Dec. 12, 1991 51 int. Cl.... H03K 17/16 52 U.S. C.... 307/443; 307/451; 307/548 58) Field of Search... 307/448, 443, 451, 548, 307/550 (56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,210,829 7/1980 Wong et al.... 307/550 4,437,024 3/1984 Wacyk...... 307/475 4,471,242 9/1984 Noufer et al.... 307/475 4,672,243 6/1987 Krisch...... 307/475 4,791,323 12/1988 Austin.... 307/45 4,806,801 2/1989 Argade...... 307/475 4,825,106 4/1989 Tipon et al.... 307/451 5,036,226 7/1991 Tonnu et al.... 307/455 USOO5304867A 11 Patent Number: 5,304,867 (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 19, 1994 5,144,167 9/1992 McClintock... 307/450 5,151,622 9/1992 Thrower... 307/451 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 125733 5/1984 European Pat. Off.. Primary Examiner-Edward P. Westin Assistant Examiner-Andrew Sanders Attorney, Agent, or Firm-James H. Fox 57 ABSTRACT Prior-art high speed TTL-to-CMOS input buffers con sume a large amount of power supply current through the input transistors when the input voltage is held at a mid-range level between VDD and VSS (e.g., 2.0 volts). The inventive input buffer includes a resistance in series with the p-channel pull-up transistor on the input in verter, in order to limit this current. In addition, to retain high operating speed, a p-channel shunt transistor is placed in parallel with the resistance, and controlled by the buffer output signal. This shunt transistor effec tively bypasses the resistance from the circuit when the buffer output goes low, thereby providing high operat ing speed. 11 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets

U.S. Patent Apr. 19, 1994 Sheet 1 of 2 5,304,867 FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART) 11 VDD 16 VIN f VoUT 10

U.S. Patent Apr. 19, 1994 Sheet 2 of 2 5,304,867 FIG. 3

1. CMOS INPUT BUFFER WITH HOH. SPEED AND LOW POWER 5,304,867 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 5 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an integrated circuit having a complementary (e.g., CMOS) input buffer. 2. Description of the Prior Art 10 Integrated circuits (ICs) use one or more input buff ers to interface with external circuitry that supplies digital or analog signals to the IC. In the case of CMOS (from Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) integrated circuits, the input buffer typically takes the form shown in FIG. 1. An input voltage Vin is applied 15 to the gates of p-channel pull-up transistor 11 and n channel pull-down transistor 12, which form an input inverter complementary pair. The drains of input tran sistors 11 and 12 are coupled to common node 13, which drives the gates of the output inverter comple 20 mentary pair, transistors 14 and 15. This output inverter is usually included to provide additional capability to chive various other circuitry on the IC from the buffer output node 16. One criteria of buffer operation is prop agation delay, which is the difference in time that the 25 input crosses the switching threshold of the input in verter pair (typically about 1.5 volts) to the time the output (node 16) crosses the voltage of VDD(typically about 2.5 volts). Another criteria is power consumption, which depends in large part upon the current I that 30 flows through the input inverter. In the case of buffers designed to receive transistor transistor logic (TTL) voltage levels, the current I may become undesirably large. This is because the TTL logic levels are, at worst case, 0.8 volts (low) or 2.0 35 volts (high). These voltages are usually above the con duction thresholds of CMOS transistors 11 and 12. That is, the p-channel input transistor (I 1) and n-channel input transistor (12) may both be conducting at Vin=0.8 volts, and typically even more conducting at Vin=2.0 volts. Therefore, since DC voltages may be present at these levels when TTL input signals are supplied, a relatively large current I may flow, causing undesir ably high power consumption by the input buffer. One technique of limiting this current flow is to make the 45 input transistors smaller, which increases their "on' resistance. However, that has the undesirable effect of limiting the speed of the input transistors. Hence, a solution to the problem has been sought by other means. One technique that has been successfully adopted in 50 practice is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 672,243 co-assigned herewith. That technique makes use of a transition de tector to control a voltage boosting means connected to the input of the first inverter, and may be considered a "feed-forward technique. However, that technique 55 requires a relatively large number of additional transis tors. In another approach, a voltage-dropping transistor is inserted between the positive power supply (VDD) and the p-channel input transistor; see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,471,242. The reduced operating voltage prevents the p-channel input transistor from turning on when the lowest level of a logic 1 is present. How ever, that approach typically results in a significant reduction of operating speed. 65 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION I have invented an integrated circuit input buffer having a feedback signal that limits the current flowing 2 through the input inverter over a portion of the input signal range. In a preferred embodiment, a resistance means is located in series with a power supply lead that supplies DC current to the input pull-up or pull-down transistor. A switching means responsive to the feed back signal is connected so as to effectively bypass the resistance means when a buffer output signal passes a given threshold. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows a typical prior-art TTL to CMOS input buffer. FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of the present inven tion. FIG.3 shows an alternate embodiment of the present invention. DETALED OESCRIPTION The following detailed description relates to an inte grated circuit having at least one input buffer that in cludes a complementary-pair input inverter. Referring to FIG. 2, an illustrative embodiment of the invention as implemented in CMOS technology is shown. The input inverter comprises complementary transistor pair 21 and 22, whereas the output inverter comprises comple mentary transistor paid 24 and 25. In addition, a resis tance means is placed in series with transistor 21; that is, between the source of transistor 21 and the positive power supply (VDD). In a typical case, the resistance means is implemented using a p-channel transistor (27) having its gate connected to VSS, as shown. A p-chan nel "shunt' transistor (28) is placed in parallel with the resistance means, with the gate of transistor (28) being connected to the output node (26). In operation, the channel current through the input inverter transistors 21 and 22 is limited by the resistance means, as long as shunt transistor 28 is non-conductive. This allows for significantly reducing the DC power flow through the input inverter. When shunt transistor 28 conducts, the resistance means is effectively bypassed, which allows for high-speed operation to be obtained. The operation may be understood by considering the following sequence: (1) When Vin (node 20) is low (0 volts), the output node of the input inverter (23) is high, and the output node of the output inverter (26) is low. Thus, transistor 28 is "on' (conductive), and node 29 is held at a solid VDD. As Vin increases past the switching threshold of the input inverter, node 23 goes low and node 26 goes high, which turns transistor 28 "off" (non-conductive). In a typical TTL input buffer, the switching threshold of the input inverter is set at about 1.5 volts. When transistor 28 is off, the only DC current that can flow through the input inverter is through the resistance means, being transistor 27. In a typical case, this is about an order of magnitude less current than would be nor mally flowing through the input inverter when V-2 volts. Hence, in this exemplary case, the resistance means is included in the current path of the input in verter for the range of Vin from 1.5 to 5 volts. (2) When Vin is decreasing from a high value, shunt transistor 28 is initially off. As Vin crosses the switching threshold of the input inverter. (e.g., 1.5 volts), node 23 goes high. This forces node 26 to go low, and thus turns on transistor 28, which brings node 29 to a solid VDD. Hence, the resistance means is effectively bypassed, removing it from the current path of the input inverter

3 for the range of Vin from 1.5 to 0 volts. In the time between Vin crossing the switching threshold and tran sistor 28 fuming on, the only current available to keep node 29 high is provided by transistor 27. This consider ation places an upper limit on the resistance of transistor 27, which in turn places a lower limit on power reduc tion. EXAMPLE An input buffer was implemented in 0.9 micron CMOS technology, with input inverter transistors 21 and 22 having channel width/length (W/L) of 7.75/1.5 and 22.1/1.4 micrometers, respectively, to provide a switching threshold of 1.5 volts. The size (WAL) of output inverter transistor 25 was twice that of transistor 24, to provide rapid turn-off of shunt transistor 28. The shunt transistor 28 had a WAL of 80, and the resistance means transistor 27 had a WAL of 3/100. (This gave transistor 27 a resistance of about 1 megohm.) This design provided a decrease in the worst-case (Vin=2 volts) power consumption of a factor of 15. However, the worst-case speed was only 9 percent slower at a load of 3 picofarads (at node 26) as compared to the nominal switching speed (about 4 nanoseconds) of a conventional buffer as shown in FIG. 1 having the same size inverter transistors. Furthermore, has the switching threshold voltage of the input inverter was not signifi cantly affected by transistors 27 and 28, being the same as that of the conventional buffer (FIG. 1). The exem plary transistor sizes are not necessarily optimum for all applications, and a wide variety of other transistor ra tios are possible, depending on the amount of power reduction desired and the amount of speed reduction that can be tolerated. In general, when a transistor is used as the resistance means, I recommend that it have a width-to-length ratio (W/L) in the range of from about 3/200 to 3/20 for TTL input levels. An alterative embodiment of the invention is illus trated in FIG. 3. In that case, the resistance means (tran sistor 37) and the shunt transistor (38) are located be tween the source of the n-channel input inverter transis tor (32) and VSS. Note that the resistance transistor and shunt transistor are n-channel in this embodiment. Fur thermore, the resistance is included in series with the input inverter when Vout (node 36) goes low, rather than high as in the embodiment of FIG. 2. Therefore, in the case of a TTL input buffer, since the desired switch ing threshold is about 1.5 volts, the possibility of a large power reduction without compromising performance is not as great in the embodiment of FIG.3 as compared to FIG. 2. However, it may be more useful in other applications. In addition, it is possible to combine the embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3, wherein resistance means and shunt transistors are included between the input inverter for both power supply voltage connec tions. That may be used to provide still further power reduction, as in very low power (e.g., battery powered) applications. While the above embodiments have been described as T-FL input buffers, still other applications of the inven tive technique are possible, and included herein. For example, an input buffer operating from a 5 volt power supply may be designed to receive 3.3 volt logic levels. In that case, the present invention provides for reduced power consumption when the input signal is at the high (e.g., 3.3 volt) logic level. The use of the present tech nique with analog input signals is also possible, and also included herein. Furthermore, the above embodiments 5,304,867 10 15 20 25 30 35 45 50 55 65 4. have shown two inverter stages in the buffer, which is adequate in most cases. However, if additional drive capability is desired, still more inverter stages may be added following the second inverter shown. In that case, it is still desirable to connect the gate of the shunt transistor to the output of the second inverter, as shown, which is considered to be the buffer output node as used herein. Finally, while the above implementation has been shown in CMOS technology, the inventive technique may be applied to any technology that imple ments complementary transistors (i.e., those having different conductivity types), including bipolar technol Ogy. As shown in the above embodiments, the resistor means is implemented as an insulated gate enhance ment-mode field effect transistor. Depletion-mode de vices may alteratively be used, in which case the gate is typically connected to the opposite power supply termi nal shown above. The use of a transistor as the resis tance means is relatively easy to implement, and readily provides the desired resistance in a relatively small area. In addition, a transistor may be formed by the same processes used to form the other transistors in the input buffer. Therefore, the resistance means will tend to track changes in fabrication processing conditions and temperature that affect the other buffer transistors, thereby at least partially compensating for such changes. However, still other resistor types are possible, including the use of doped regions in a silicon substrate, or deposited resistors, including polysilicon types. I claim: 1. An integrated circuit having an input buffer com prising an input inverter having a p-channel field effect transistor serially connected with an n-channel field effect transistor that are coupled to receive an input signal, and an output inverter coupled to a buffer output node, Characterized in that said buffer further comprises a current-limiting transistor biased to conductor and directly connected in series between a controlled electrode of a first one of the complementary tran sistors of said input inverter and a power supply conductor; and still further comprises a shunt transistor having controlled electrodes connected in parallel with said current-limiting transistor and having a con trol electrode coupled to said buffer output node. 2. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein said cur rent-limiting transistor is a field effect transistor having its gate connected to a power supply voltage conductor. 3. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein said field effect transistor is a p-channel transistor. 4. The integrated circuit of claim 3 wherein said p channel transistor is an enhancement mode device, and has its gate connected to a negative power supply volt age conductor. 5. The integrated circuit of claim 4 wherein said out put inverter comprises a p-channel field effect transistor serially connected with an n-channel field effect transis tor. 6. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein said field effect transistor is an n-channel transistor. 7. The integrated circuit of claim 6 wherein said n channel transistor is an enhancement mode device, and has its gate connected to a positive power supply volt age conductor. 8. The integrated circuit of claim 7 wherein said out put inverter comprises a p-channel field effect transistor

5,304,867 5 6 serially connected with an n-channel field effect transis- Characterized in that said buffer further comprises a tor. resistance p-channel transistor having its drain con 9. An integrated circuit having an input buffer com- nected to said given node, its source connected to prising: a positive power supply voltage conductor, and its a first inverter comprising an n-channel field effect gate connected to a negative power supply voltage transistor having its source connected to a negative conductor; w power supply conductor, its gate connected to an and still further comprises a shunt p-channel transis input node, and its drain connected to a first in tor having its drain connected to said given node, verter output node; and a p-channel field effect its source connected to said positive power supply transistor having its gate connected to said input 10 voltage conductor, and its gate connected to said buffer output node. node, its drain connected to said first inverter out- 10. The integrated circuit of claim 2 wherein said Put node and its source connected to a given node; current-limiting field effect transistor has a width-to p-channel field effect transistor having their gates 15 11. The integrated circuit of claim 9 wherein said connected to said first inverter output node, their resistance p-channel field effect transistor has a width a second inverter comprising 2 n-channel and a length ratio (W/L) in the range of from 3/200 to 3/20. sources connected to negative and positive power supply voltage conductors, respectively, and their 3/20. drains connected to a buffer output node; is.... 20 to-length ratio (W/L) in the range of from 3/200 to 25 30 35 45 50 55 65