A Synchrotron Phase Detector for the Fermilab Booster

Similar documents
Booster High-level RF Frequency Tracking Improvement Via the Bias-Curve Optimization

National Accelerator Laboratory

New apparatus for precise synchronous phase shift measurements in storage rings 1

Field Stability Issue for Normal Conducting Cavity under Beam Loading

Tutorial on Design of RF system for Indus Accelerator. Maherdra Lad Head, Radio Frequency Systems Division RRCAT, Indore

Design and performance of LLRF system for CSNS/RCS *

Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab

RF System Models and Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Automatic phase calibration for RF cavities using beam-loading signals. Jonathan Edelen LLRF 2017 Workshop (Barcelona) 18 Oct 2017

Jørgen S. Nielsen Institute for Storage Ring Facilities, Aarhus, University of Aarhus Denmark

Acceleration of High-Intensity Protons in the J-PARC Synchrotrons. KEK/J-PARC M. Yoshii

Cavity Field Control - RF Field Controller. LLRF Lecture Part3.3 S. Simrock, Z. Geng DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Beam Diagnostics, Low Level RF and Feedback for Room Temperature FELs. Josef Frisch Pohang, March 14, 2011

Measurement Setup for Bunched Beam Echoes in the HERA Proton Storage Ring

Linearity Improvement Techniques for Wireless Transmitters: Part 1

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

The impedance budget of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (PS)

HOM Based Diagnostics at the TTF

RF Systems I. Erk Jensen, CERN BE-RF

THE LINAC LASER NOTCHER FOR THE FERMILAB BOOSTER*

Performance of the Prototype NLC RF Phase and Timing Distribution System *

ELECTRON BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AND FEEDBACK FOR THE LCLS-II*

STABILITY CONSIDERATIONS

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 23 Mar 2018

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Herwig Schopper CERN 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. Introduction

JEDI. Status of the commissioning of the waveguide RF Wien Filter

Nonintercepting Diagnostics for Transverse Beam Properties: from Rings to ERLs

CHAPTER 6 BOOSTER RF SYSTEMS

Calibrating the Cavity Voltage. Presentation of an idea

Title: New High Efficiency Intermodulation Cancellation Technique for Single Stage Amplifiers.

JUAS 2018 LINACS. Jean-Baptiste Lallement, Veliko Dimov BE/ABP CERN.

3 rd Harmonic Cavity at ELETTRA

Main Injector Cavity Simulation and Optimization for Project X

Design of ESS-Bilbao RFQ Linear Accelerator

Digital LLRF Test on the Renascence Cryomodule

Accelerator Complex U70 of IHEP-Protvino: Status and Upgrade Plans

DEVELOPMENT OF CAPACITIVE LINEAR-CUT BEAM POSITION MONITOR FOR HEAVY-ION SYNCHROTRON OF KHIMA PROJECT

RF-based Synchronization of the Seed and Pump-Probe Lasers to the Optical Synchronization System at FLASH

Predictions of LER-HER limits

HIGHER ORDER MODES FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS IN THIRD HARMONIC 3.9 GHZ ACCELERATING MODULES *

Differential Amp DC Analysis by Robert L Rauck

rf amplitude modulation to suppress longitudinal coupled bunch instabilities in the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron

SPEAR BTS Toroid Calibration

3 General layout of the XFEL Facility

레이저의주파수안정화방법및그응용 박상언 ( 한국표준과학연구원, 길이시간센터 )

Digital Signal Processing in RF Applications

Beam Infrared Detection with Resolution in Time

10th ESLS RF Meeting September ALBA RF System. F. Perez. on behalf of the ALBA RF Group. ALBA RF System 1/21

Sub-ps (and sub-micrometer) developments at ELETTRA

Experiment-4 Study of the characteristics of the Klystron tube

CH85CH2202-0/85/ $1.00

Linear Particle Accelerator Control Performance

Borut Baricevic. Libera LLRF. 17 September 2009

Detection of Beam Induced Dipole-Mode Signals in the SLC S-Band Structures* Abstract

Maurizio Vretenar Linac4 Project Leader EuCARD-2 Coordinator

Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark. ESLS-RF 22 (8/ ), ASTRID2 RF system 1

New Tracking Gantry-Synchrotron Idea. G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL, U.K,

Slide Title. Bulleted Text

Baseband simulation model of the vector rf voltage control system for the J-PARC RCS

Dr.-Ing. Ulrich L. Rohde

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

FAST RF KICKER DESIGN

(Refer Slide Time: 00:03:22)

Normal-conducting high-gradient rf systems

Timing Noise Measurement of High-Repetition-Rate Optical Pulses

Installation and Characterization of the Advanced LIGO 200 Watt PSL

Position of the LHC luminous region

A 3 GHz SRF reduced-β Cavity for the S-DALINAC

Positron Beam Position Measurement for a Beam Containing Both Positrons and Electrons *

RF Power Consumption in the ESS Spoke LINAC

... George Gollin. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Femtosecond-stability delivery of synchronized RFsignals to the klystron gallery over 1-km optical fibers

Project of RF System for 2.2 GeV Electron Storage Ring Zelenograd SR Source.

1997 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, May 12-16, 1997 BNL

Electron Cloud Studies in the Fermilab Main Injector using Microwave Transmission

Feedback Requirements for SASE FELS. Henrik Loos, SLAC IPAC 2010, Kyoto, Japan

Amplitude and Phase Stability of Analog Components for the LLRF System of the PEFP Accelerator

Superconducting RF Cavity Performance Degradation after Quenching in Static Magnetic Field

NEW LASER ULTRASONIC INTERFEROMETER FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS B.Pouet and S.Breugnot Bossa Nova Technologies; Venice, CA, USA

D-STATE RADIOMETER. I. Switch Driver

Energy Recovering Linac Issues

AN increasing number of video and communication applications

note application Measurement of Frequency Stability and Phase Noise by David Owen

Effects of Intensity and Position Modulation On Switched Electrode Electronics Beam Position Monitor Systems at Jefferson Lab*

AC Dispersion Measurement. David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

LBI-30398N. MAINTENANCE MANUAL MHz PHASE LOCK LOOP EXCITER 19D423249G1 & G2 DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. DESCRIPTION...

Introductory Electronics for Scientists and Engineers

Optical phase-coherent link between an optical atomic clock. and 1550 nm mode-locked lasers

MICROWAVE AND RADAR LAB (EE-322-F) LAB MANUAL VI SEMESTER

LOI Progress Report -- Summary of Experiment in January

FPGA-BASED PULSED-RF PHASE AND AMPLITUDE DETECTOR AT SLRI

EMMA the World's First Non-Scaling FFAG Accelerator

Reducing space charge tune shift with a barrier cavity

Architecture and Performance of the PEP-II Low-Level RF System*

Detailed Design Report

ERICSSONZ LBI-30398P. MAINTENANCE MANUAL MHz PHASE LOCKED LOOP EXCITER 19D423249G1 & G2 DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE TIRUCHIRAPALLI UNIT III TUNED AMPLIFIERS PART A (2 Marks)

R. J. Jones College of Optical Sciences OPTI 511L Fall 2017

Converters for Cycling Machines

Transcription:

FERMILAB-TM-2234 A Synchrotron Phase Detector for the Fermilab Booster Xi Yang and Rene Padilla Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Box 5, Batavia IL 651 Abstract A synchrotron phase detector is diagnostic tool for measuring the relative phase between the accelerating field and the beam. One has been implemented in the Fermilab Booster. This is probably the first time for the Booster that the accelerating voltage seen by the beam can be experimentally determined from the information of the synchrotron phase measurement and the existing total rf accelerating voltage (RFSUM) signal without using the calculated synchrotron phase values. Introduction A synchrotron phase detector is important for the purpose of directly measuring the phase relationship between the beam and the accelerating gap voltage at the rf cavities. It is a powerful diagnostic tool for examining the stability and efficiency of the feedback control system including the whole loop starting from low level rf (LLRF) driver to high level rf (HLRF) accelerating voltage. Besides that, the motivation of measuring the particle distribution in longitudinal phase space (LPS) at different times of an accelerating cycle and from these particle distributions to extract the relationship between the longitudinal emittance growth and the accelerating voltage (RFSUM) underlies our effort to build a synchrotron phase detector. The significance of the synchrotron phase detector is that before the synchrotron phase detector was implemented, the effective accelerating voltage seen by the beam only could be derived from the RFSUM signal and the calculated synchrotron phase. The synchrotron phase calculation requires that the longitudinal impedance be known. However with the synchrotron phase detector, one can obtain the synchrotron phase experimentally Design The synchrotron phase detector system includes two rf input signals, the phase detector [1], which has a bandwidth of at least 2 MHz and uses a Log comparison of two rf signals, and a program to translate the direct phase measurement of two rf input signals 1

into the synchrotron phase coordinate. Here, we specialize to the synchrotron phase detector in the Fermilab Booster, a rather typical example. However, there is a complication that is somewhat special. The rf reference signal must be summed from at least one cavity in each of two groups. These cavity groups, called Group A and Group B, can be run with arbitrary but opposite time dependent offsets from the synchronous phase to control the effective rf amplitude acting on the beam. The rf signal from the beam is taken from the resistive wall monitor in the straight section long 18 of the Booster ring. The signal to noise ratio from the beam current pickup is improved by connecting it through a bandpass filter with a pass band of 29 MHz to 63 MHz because the 6 GHz bandwidth of the resistive wall monitor passes much other information besides the phase of the rf fundamental component. The other input signal to the phase detector is the vector sum of two downstream gap pickups, from station 7 of Group A and station 8 of Group B. Cable lengths of the two input signals to the phase detector were carefully matched since Booster RF frequency changes from 38 MHz at injection to 53 MHz at extraction. The final adjustment of the two cable lengths was made using a criterion of zero degree synchrotron phase at injection. The phase detector delivers a signal of 9 degree per volt. The output of the phase detector is the relative phase between the beam signal and the effective RF voltage at the gap of RF cavities. Two Options for Forming the Sum Signal We ran into a difficulty when we tried to get the vector sum of two downstream gap pickups, one from station 8 of Group B and one from station 7 of Group A, to represent the rf voltage acting on the beam from these two stations. They are in the same long straight section 17 of the Booster ring. The beam has a constant of 152 phase advance between them while the beam flight time changes because of the acceleration. The phase advance is determined by the ratio of the beam flight time to the rf period during the entire acceleration from 4 MeV to 8 GeV as calculated by Eq. 1. = ( ) L f t ( ( ) ) β t c φ ( ) 36 (1) t Here, L is the distance between these two stations, f(t) is the rf frequency at time t of a Booster cycle, β(t)c is the velocity of the beam at time t. It is clear that the beam has a constant phase advance between these two stations if the ratio of the beam velocity and 2

the rf frequency is kept constant. It is necessary to add a delay to the upstream gap pickup in such a way that it provides a constant of 152 phase shift while the rf frequency changes from 38 MHz to 53 MHz. Our first approach was to use a cable delay to the pickup of the upstream rf station. Although it is impossible to use a cable delay to obtain a constant 152 phase shift over the frequency range, one can correct the error introduced by the fixed cable delay. The cable length would need to be varied from 11.14 ns to 8. ns in order to maintain a 152 phase shift, see Fig. 1(a). If an 11.14 ns cable is used to provide 152 phase shift for the gap pickup of station 7 at injection, the phase error caused by the fixed cable length is shown as the red curve in Fig. 1(b). The phase error curve when an 8 ns cable is used for providing 152 phase shift at extraction is shown as the black curve. A 9 ns cable is chosen according to Fig. 1(a) because we have a particular interest in the synchrotron phase measurement when RFSUM is reduced at 5.5 ms to 6.5 ms in the cycle. The synchrotron phase measurement using the vector sum of two gap pickups from station 7 and station 8 with a 9 ns cable delay for the pickup of station 7 is shown in Fig. 2(a). The red and black curves represent the same synchrotron phase measurement before and after the correction. Here, the correction, shown in Fig. 2(b), is calculated from Eq. 2. ( ) ( ( 152 ) T ( )) 9) RF t φ ( t) = 36 36 ( ) (2) TRF t T RF (t) is the RF period at time t of a Booster cycle. (152 /36 ) T RF (t)-9 is the deviation of the beam flight time from station 7 to station 8 at time t with fixed 9 ns cable delay. The delay is added to the gap pickup of station 7 before it is summed with the gap pickup of station 8. The dispersion from the 9 ns cable can be neglected because the cable length is less than a half wavelength in the range of 38 MHz to 53 MHz. The synchrotron phase measurement after correction, the black curve in Fig. 2(a), has the general features expected but some details worthy of investigation. 3

A refinement to making the vector sum of the pickups represent the accelerating voltage seen by the beam is made by employing a wide band phase shifter providing 152 phase advance to the downstream station 8 to subtract the phase delay introduced by the beam moving from station 7 to station 8. The block diagram of the synchrotron phase detector with the wide band phase shifter is shown in Fig. 3. A 7 ns cable is removed from the signal of station 8 to compensate the time delay introduced by the wide band phase shifter. When the vector sum of pickups is taken as the reference rf input to the phase detector using the wide band phase shifter, the synchrotron phase measurement is as shown in Fig. 4. The measurement was made while the Booster intensity was 5.4 x 1 12 protons at extraction. A final test to the synchrotron phase detector was to reduce the effective accelerating voltage and simultaneously observe the synchrotron phase change controlled by the feedback system. One expects that the synchrotron phase should move toward 9 during the rf voltage reduction because of the phase feedback loop; the accelerating voltage is increased by making the synchrotron phase closer to 9. Thus, the rf voltage reduction should be compensated by an increase in synchrotron phase. The result is shown in Fig. 5. The synchrotron phase of the beam did indeed approach 9 during the rf voltage reduction. Potential Refinement Both correcting the synchrotron phase measurement when a 9 ns cable delay is added to the upstream pickup and using a wideband 152 phase shifter added to the downstream pickup before the vector summation have the same small problem. The phase of the rf sum from station 7 and station 8 need not be exactly the same as the phase of RFSUM from all rf stations, primarily because each rf station has its own local feedback loop to compensate beam loading by detuning the cavity. Beam loading is detected by a phase detector measuring the phase difference between the rf drive to the power amplifier (PA) and the gap pickup signal from the rf cavity. The cavity is tuned to resonance with the drive through the control of the bias current in the tuner. The amount of the cavity detuning is determined by the phase error signal, which is developed by the beam induced phase shift at the gap pickup. Cable lengths of the rf drive and the gap pickup signal are carefully matched, so the phase difference between the drive and the gap 4

pickup should be zero when no beam is present. The rf cavity output can be understood as the superposition of two sine waves, one from the rf field in the cavity without beam present and one from the beam induced wake field at the beam frequency. The sum is also a sine wave with a phase shift with respect to the zero beam rf field derived from the phase and amplitude of the wake field. Different rf cavities may have different responses to the beam induced wake field due to effects, such as power amplifier degradation, ferrite tuner power supply problems, etc. If so, there will be phase differences among the 18 rf cavities. Since the RFSUM signal is used to estimate the total volts per turn seen by the beam [2], it is obtained so that cable lengths from downstream gap pickups of 18 Booster rf stations are carefully matched before they are summed. In addition, wide band phase shifters are used to provide compensation for beam transit time from station to station with constant phase shifts over the entire Booster cycle. Thus, the RFSUM signal from all rf stations is the preferable reference rf input to the synchrotron phase detector. This has yet to be implemented because of practical obstacles, which can, however, be overcome without disturbing the functioning low level system. Acknowledgements Special thanks should be given to Chuck Ankenbrandt. He used his expertise to give authors important suggestions in the process of building the synchrotron phase detector. James MacLachlan also spent a lot of time in helping authors understand the basic related to this work. Without Milorad Popovic s support, this work couldn t have been completed quickly. References [1] R. D. Padilla, and B. Scala, Fermilab / Accelerator Division / RF Department / HLRF Group Document. (22) [2] J. Steimel, Fermilab / Accelerator Division / RF Department / HLRF (FanBack / FanOut) Document. (1992) 5

RF Frequency (MHz) 54 52 5 48 46 44 42 4 38 36 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 Time in a Booster cycle (ms) Fig. 1(a) 12 11 1 9 8 7 Beam Flight Time at 152 Phase Advance (ns) 3 Phase Error (degree) 2 1-1 -2 Phase Error for RFSUM(A+B) For 152 Phase Shift Match at 32 ms For 152 Phase Shift Match at ms -3-4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (ms) Fig. 1(b) Figure 1(a) The black curve represents the Booster RF frequency vs. time in a Booster cycle, and the blue curve represents the flight time from station 7 to station 8. 1(b) The red curve represents the phase error is introduced by adding an 8 ns cable to provide a 152 phase shift in the Booster frequency range. The black curve represents the phase error introduced by adding a 11.14 ns cable to provide the phase shift. 6

18 16 Correct Error from 9-ns Cable Delay Synchrotron Phase (degree) 14 12 1 8 6 4 Before Correction 2 Sum of station 7 & 8 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (ms) 2(a) 2 Synchrotron Phase Error (degree) 15 1 5-5 -1 Phase Error induced by the 9-ns Cable Delay for the Station 7 Signal 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (ms) Fig. 2(b) Figure 2(a) The red curve represents the synchrotron phase measurement when a 9 ns cable delay is used for the upstream pickup before it is summed with the downstream pickup. The black curve represents the synchrotron phase measurement with correction made by subtracting the error introduced by the cable delay. 2(b) The curve represents the phase error from a 9 ns delay cable vs. time in the cycle; it has been used to obtain the black curve in Fig. 2(a) from red curve in Fig. 2(a). 7

Filter Wide Band Phase Detector RF1 RF2 Phase Error 1V = 9 Power Combiner -18 Power Splitter Diode Detector -9 Diode Detector Power Splitter Power Splitter Resistive Wall Monitor Downstream Gap Monitor Booster RF Cavity Station #8 Downstream Gap Monitor Booster RF Cavity Station #7 Figure 3 the block diagram shows the configuration of the synchrotron phase detector when the situation that a 152 wideband shifter is added to the station 7 pickup before it is vector summed with the station 8 pickup. 8

18 16 Synchrotron Phase (degree) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (ms) Fig. 4 Figure 4 The synchrotron phase vs. time in a Booster cycle using a wideband 152 phase shifter in the station 8 pickup output. 9

18 16 Synchrotron Phase (degree) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (ms) Fig. 5(a) Figure 5(a) Synchrotron phase vs. time in a Booster cycle when RFSUM is reduced during the period 5.5-6.5 ms after injection. The synchrotron phase detector configuration is the same used in the measurement shown in Fig. 4. 5(b) Charge vs. time and RFSUM vs. time in the experimental condition of Fig. 5(a) 1