Resistive Plate Chambers for Experiments at India-based Neutrino Observatory(INO) Saikat Biswas VECC, Kolkata India

Similar documents
Y.P. Viyogi DAE Raja Ramanna Fellow VECC Kolkata for INO collaboration

Surface resistivity measurements and related performance studies of the Bakelite RPC detectors

Study of Resistive Plate Chambers Scintillation detectors and Reconstruction of muon tracks in RPCs

Measurement of Characteristic Impedance of Silicon Fiber Sheet based readout strips panel for RPC detector in INO

FABRICATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF RESISTIVE PLATE CHAMBER.

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Jul 2018

Development and Characterization of 2m x 2m Glass Resistive Plate Chambers

Gas Detectors for μ systems

Trigger Rate Dependence and Gas Mixture of MRPC for the LEPS2 Experiment at SPring-8

The trigger system of the muon spectrometer of the ALICE experiment at the LHC

Operation and performance of the CMS Resistive Plate Chambers during LHC run II

An ASIC dedicated to the RPCs front-end. of the dimuon arm trigger in the ALICE experiment.

OPERA RPC: installation and underground test results

Aging studies for the CMS RPC system

Plans for RPC DHCAL Prototype. David Underwood Argonne National Laboratory

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 Oct 2012

DHCAL Prototype Construction José Repond Argonne National Laboratory

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

1.1 The Muon Veto Detector (MUV)

Scintillators as an external trigger for cathode strip chambers

Development of large readout area, high time resolution RPCs for LEPS2 at SPring-8

Draft proposal for the LHCb muon detector using RPC

A Modular Readout System For A Small Liquid Argon TPC Carl Bromberg, Dan Edmunds Michigan State University

Recent Development and Study of Silicon Solid State Photomultiplier (MRS Avalanche Photodetector)

Detectors for the MINOS long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment *

Lecture 5. Detectors for Ionizing Particles: Gas Detectors Principles and Detector Concepts

irpc upgrade project for CMS during HL-LHC program

Spectrometer cavern background

Lecture 11. Complex Detector Systems

Development of Large Area and of Position Sensitive Timing RPCs

RD51 ANNUAL REPORT WG1 - Technological Aspects and Development of New Detector Structures

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Apr 2002

CMS RPC HL-LHC upgrade with fast timing detectors

ADAPTABLE GEOMETRY, LOW MASS HODOSCOPES US1 NG CATHODE READ-OUT PROPORTIONAL CHAMBERS*

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

CALICE AHCAL overview

The Multigap RPC: The Time-of-Flight Detector for the ALICE experiment

A METHOD TO ADJUST THE IMPEDANCE OF THE SIGNAL TRANSMISSION LINE IN A MULTI-STRIP MULTI-GAP RESISTIVE PLATE COUNTER

Full characterization tests of Micromegas with elongated pillars

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment at the LHC. Images of Assembly and Installation

The CMS Outer HCAL SiPM Upgrade.

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Jun 2015

ILC Prototype Muon Scintillation Counter Tests

Micromegas TPC. SLAC American LC Workshop. Magnetic field cosmic ray tests

Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Neutrino Meeting at Santa Fe, October 30, 2005

What s a Counter Plateau. An introduction for the muon Lab

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 9 Aug 2017

Backgrounds in DMTPC. Thomas Caldwell. Massachusetts Institute of Technology DMTPC Collaboration

ORIENTATION LAB. Directions

A Large Low-mass GEM Detector with Zigzag Readout for Forward Tracking at EIC

Large Size GEM Detectors for 12 GeV Program in Hall A at JLab

STUDY OF NEW FNAL-NICADD EXTRUDED SCINTILLATOR AS ACTIVE MEDIA OF LARGE EMCAL OF ALICE AT LHC

GEM beam test for the BESIII experiment

5. RESISTIVE PLATE CHAMBERS

The Detector at the CEPC: Calorimeters

Construction and Performance of the stgc and Micromegas chambers for ATLAS NSW Upgrade

Micromegas for muography, the Annecy station and detectors

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 9 May 2016

The Light Amplifier Concept

P ILC A. Calcaterra (Resp.), L. Daniello (Tecn.), R. de Sangro, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo, M. Rama

The (Speed and) Decay of Cosmic-Ray Muons

Testing the Electronics for the MicroBooNE Light Collection System

A BaF2 calorimeter for Mu2e-II

Gas Electron Multiplier Detectors

Method for digital particle spectrometry Khryachkov Vitaly

The CMS Muon Detector

Chemistry 985. Some constants: q e 1.602x10 19 Coul, ɛ x10 12 F/m h 6.626x10 34 J-s, c m/s, 1 atm = 760 Torr = 101,325 Pa

NEEP 427 PROPORTIONAL COUNTERS. Knoll, Chapters 6 & 14 Sect. I & II

1 Detector simulation

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Recommissioning the Qweak Drift Chambers Using a Cosmic-Ray Telescope

Development of Photon Detectors at UC Davis Daniel Ferenc Eckart Lorenz Alvin Laille Physics Department, University of California Davis

Recent Developments in Gaseous Tracking Detectors

The MUSE experiment. Technical Overview. Guy Ron (for the MUSE collaboration) Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Development of a LFLE Double Pattern Process for TE Mode Photonic Devices. Mycahya Eggleston Advisor: Dr. Stephen Preble

Characterization of the stgc Detector Using the Pulser System

DAYA BAY. Kwong Lau. University of Houston. On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration

IRST SiPM characterizations and Application Studies

High counting rate, differential, strip read-out, multi gap timing RPC

Commissioning Status and Results of ATLAS Level1 Endcap Muon Trigger System. Yasuyuki Okumura. Nagoya TWEPP 2008

Recent Results from MINOS

The Muon Detector Update

Instructions for gg Coincidence with 22 Na. Overview of the Experiment

Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in Run I and Upgrades for Run II

CONTROL AND READOUT ELECTRONICS OF THE TIME- OF-FLIGHT SYSTEM OF THE MPD

LABORATÓRIO DE INSTRUMENTAÇÃO E FÍSICA EXPERIMENTAL DE PARTÍCULAS

A large area TOF-tracker

Development of a large area silicon pad detector for the identification of cosmic ions

Parallel Ionization Multiplier(PIM) : a new concept of gaseous detector for radiation detection improvement

The ATLAS Toroid Magnet

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS detector performance.

Tutors Dominik Dannheim, Thibault Frisson (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland)

Characterization of GEM Chambers Using 13bit KPiX Readout System

Scintillation Counters

The pixel readout of Micro Patterned Gaseous Detectors

Status of UVa

AIDA-2020 Advanced European Infrastructures for Detectors at Accelerators

A spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber for high-rate applications

TPC Readout with GEMs & Pixels

Transcription:

Resistive Plate Chambers for Experiments at India-based Neutrino Observatory(INO) Saikat Biswas VECC, Kolkata India 1

INO Collaboration Spokesperson : Prof. N.K. Mondal Collaborating institutions/universities AMU, BHU, BARC, CU, DU, HRI, UoH, HPU, IITB, IITKh, IGCAR, IMSC, IOP, LU, NBU, PU, PRL, SINP, SMIT, TIFR, VECC 2

Plan Physics motivations for INO India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) INO Detector (ICAL) Resistive plate chamber (RPC) for ICAL Test results Future Plans 3

Physics Motivations for INO To reconfirm the oscillation through appearance and disappearance of neutrinos. To measure the neutrino oscillation parameters m2 sin22 23, 13 more precisely. To determine neutrino mass hierarchy, whether normal (m2 m2 r inverted (m2 m2. 4

India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) A underground facility at PUSHEP in Nilgiri Mountains in South India, about 90 km from Mysore. A single 22 m wide, 120 m long and 30 m in height experimental hall will be constructed at the end of a 1.5 km long tunnel. At least 1 km of rock overburden in all directions. INO will have 50 kiloton Iron CALorimeter (ICAL) capable of detecting atmospheric interactions. May also host some other experiments (e.g neutrinoless double beta decay searches ) which require low cosmic ray background environment. 5

INO Detector : A Magnetized Iron CALorimeter (ICAL): Three modules, each of the size 16m 16m 12m and of mass 17 kilotons. In each module 140 layers of iron plates and RPCs. 6 cm thick iron plates separated by 2.5 cm, with Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) as active element. Total mass of 51 kilotons. The cavern can accommodate another replica of the above detector so that if necessary, a 100 kiloton mass detector can be constructed. Magnetic field ~1 Tesla allows the determination of muon charge so that and can be studied separately. 6

Iron CALorimeter (A detector for INO) Mass : 51 kilo ton (or 100 kilo ton) Magnetic field ~ 1 Tesla Dimension : 48m 16m 12m 140 layers of iron plates 7

RPC for INO Two 2 mm thick float Glass Separated by 2 mm spacer 2 mm thick spacer Pickup strips Resistive plates Complete RPC Graphite coating on the outer surfaces of resistive plates 8

INO will have the provision to change the active part of the detector. 9

Why RPC? Built from simple and common materials. Low fabrication cost per unit area. Easy to construct and operate. Simple signal pick up and readout system. Large detector area coverage. High efficiency ( >90%) and time resolution (~1ns ). Particle tracking capability. Two dimensional (x and y) readout from the same chamber. Long term stability. 10

Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) in INO RPC unit dimension : 2 m x 2 m RPC width : 6 mm Pick up strip width : 3 cm No. of RPC units / Road / Layer : 8 No. of Roads / Layer / Module : 8 No. of RPC units / Layer : 192 Total no. of RPC units : ~26000 11

Test results of glass RPC Glass RPC s have been tested both in streamer and avalanche mode. 2 RPCs 30cm x 40cm are tested in avalanche mode for >14 months. Aging problem still not solved for glass RPCs in streamer mode. 12

13

Glass RPC Efficiency Freon 134a : 62% Argon : 30% Isobutane : 8% RPC Timing Studies 14

Why Bakelite RPC? Surface smoothness of glossy-finish melamine coated bakelite sheet is comparable to glass. Bakelite sheet is more flexible than glass and it is unbreakable. Bakelite sheet can be made 1.2 m in width and any size in length. Bulk resistivity of bakelite can be controlled adjusting the ratio of the phenol and melamine. 15

Bakelite RPC This RPC brought from China and tested in SINP. Dimension of the RPC : 30cm 30cm. Thickness of each plate : 2mm Gas gap between two plates : 2mm Width of each pick up strip: 16 3cm

High voltage testing of Bakelite RPC using Cosmic Ray at SINP/VECC 17

Arrangement of the scintillators and the RPC in SINP 18

Schematic representation of cosmic ray setup 19

Experimental setup Dimension of the RPC : 30cm 30cm Width of the pick up strip : 3cm Dimension of the big scintillators (SC1 & SC2) : 25cm 35cm Dimension of the finger scintillator (SCF) : 4cm 20cm & 2cm 20cm Trigger signal = SC1.AND. SC2.AND. SCF Efficiency = (RPC count with signal in coincidence with trigger) (Trigger count) 20

Power supply and the read out system 21

RPC s are operated in premixed mode. There is the provision to use it in flow mode using Mass Flow Controller (MFC). Gas mixing control panel in SINP 22

Gas Mixture Argon : To provide the efficient gas amplification. Isobutane : To absorb UV photon. It is the photon quench gas Freon (R134a) : To control charge and physical size of streamer. It is the electron quench gas. 23

Test result of Chinese RPC 24

Efficiency curve for RPC The Trigger rate is around 0.31/cm2/min. Plateau region has been found from voltage 7.5 KV onwards at efficiency 91%. 25

Test of stability for Chinese RPC Curve is showing the constancy of the efficiency at a particular high voltage. Average efficiency (92.7 ± 1.9)% have been observed. 26

Fabrication of RPC using local Bakelite sheet 27

Results of Resistivity Measurement of Bakelite Sheet (Grade P-1001 and Superhylam ) For grade Grade P-1001 For Superhylam Resistivity varies from 1.5 1011 Ω-cm to 5.8 1010 Ω-cm with voltage for P-1001. Superhylam is a melamine coated Bakelite. For Superhylam ρ ~ 2 x 1011 Ω IHEP, cm China at 6 KV. 28

I-V Characteristics of Bakelite (Grade P-1001 and Superhylam) For Superhylam For grade Grade P-1001 29

Test of RPC made in VECC RPC is made by white melamine coated superhylam bakelite. Dimension of the RPC : 30 cm X 30 cm. It is tested using premixed gas of Argon, Iso-Butane and R-134a (34:6.8:59.2 ). RPC is operated in Streamer mode. 30

Efficiency curve The Trigger rate is ~0.3/cm2/min. Plateau region has been found from voltage 7.5 KV onwards at efficiency >91%. At 9 KV current through the RPC ~5μA. 31

Long term stability test of RPC made by Superhylam Bakelite 32

Efficiency Vs Day RPC operated continuously for 38 days. RPC is tested at 8 KV. Efficiency decreases from a value ~92% to 82% within 38 days. 33

Trigger rate Vs Day 34

Current in two channels Current in Channel 1 Current in Channel 2 35

Noise rate Vs Day Noise rate increases with time. 36

Humidity and Temperature Humidity Vs Day Temperature Vs Day 37

Study of some properties of Bakelite (P-120) and construction of new RPC 38

I-V Characteristics of Bakelite (P-120) 39

Results of Resistivity Measurement of Bakelite Sheet (P-120) ρ ~ 9 x 1012 Ω cm at 6 KV. 40

Complete RPC made by P-120 41

I-V plot for RPC IB3 Current is ~600nA at 9 KV. 42

Efficiency plot for RPC IB3 Efficiency starts to decrease after a certain HV. 43

Present status of INO Simulations on detector geometry and material is done. Site for the experiment has been fixed. R & D on Glass RPC is going on in TIFR and BARC. R & D on Bakelite RPC is going on in SINP and VECC. A prototype of ICAL will be tested at VECC. Magnet for prototype is Ready. 44

Future plans Testing of 1m x 1m Chinese RPC. RPC testing using the gas system of VECC. Measurement of time resolution of RPC. Installation of Lab View and starting on line monitoring. Construction of pick up panel using G-10. 45

We are beginning to learn to manage large collaboration Welcome to all International collaborators... 46

Acknowledgement I am grateful to Prof. Jiawen Zhang for arranging this talk. I want to express my gratitude to Dr. Subhasis Chattopadhyay, Professor Satyajit Saha, Professor Sudeb Bhattacharya, Dr. Manoj Sharan, Dr. Abhijit Samanta and Dr. Y.P. Viyogi for all kind of supports, suggestions and discussions. Finally I want to acknowledge the supports from INO Collaboration, India as well as from. 47

Thank You 48