Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems

Similar documents
Control of noise from the operation of stationary systems

Noise insulation. A guide to the HS2 noise insulation scheme.

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)

NHS England CCG Authorisation

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

(Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS

Maasvlakte CCS Project - ROAD

Intimate Communications Hub Interface Specification Report to Secretary of State

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

National Grid s commitments when undertaking works in the UK. Our stakeholder, community and amenity policy

UK Broadband Ltd - Spectrum Access 28 GHz Licence Company Registration no: First Issued 22 July Licence Number: /01/18

REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF CITY OPERATIONS AGENDA ITEM: 7 PORTFOLIO: TRANSPORT, PLANNING & SUSTAINABILITY (COUNCILLOR RAMESH PATEL)

Government Policy Statement on Gas Governance

Statement of Evidence of N I Hegley

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

EUROPEAN COMPLIANCE PROCESSES (post RfG Implementation) CONTENTS. (This contents page does not form part of the Grid Code) Paragraph No/Title

NHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16

Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. [29 May] 2012

BLM S LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES STEP-BY-STEP

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2

THE GRID CODE OC7.5 INTEGRAL EQUIPMENT TESTS GUIDANCE NOTES

Delivery of Developer Funded Infrastructure A New Model

THE GRID CODE OC7.5 INTEGRAL EQUIPMENT TESTS

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

Agenda Item 4: Transport Strategy: Vision and Objectives

Make 50 Years of Experience Count

GE/GN8648. Guidance on Positioning of Lineside Telephones. Rail Industry Guidance Note for GE/RT8048

Progress on a Model Community Noise Ordinance Standard

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

P292 Amending Supplier & Meter Operator Agent responsibilities for smart Meter Technical Details

Linfairn Wind Farm Addendum Chapter A13: Shadow Flicker

Assured Monitoring Group

REDD+ Safeguards: How UN-REDD supports the development. María Sanz Sanchez, FAO & UN-REDD

Problems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation

Getting the evidence: Using research in policy making

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH AGREEMENT STIRLING COUNCIL AND SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

Mr Hans Hoogervorst International Accounting Standards Board 1 st Floor 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH. MV/288 Mark Vaessen.

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Ruapehu Alpine Lifts. Whakapapa Electrical Network Strategy. Summary Consultation Document. 15 December 2016

Continuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS. RECOMMENDATION No. R (89) 5 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES

About the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner

A10 Electronic Interference: Application 2 - LBHF

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

6.2 Environmental Statement Appendices Volume N Appendix 15.1 EMF Report

THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance

For consideration at the Executive Committee meeting on 6 June 2016.

CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

Geoff Brown & Associates Ltd

Rail Line Radio Systems

Statement on variation of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz Wireless Telegraphy Act licences

EDS LV SUPPLIES TO MOBILE PHONE BASE STATIONS MOUNTED ON TRANSMISSION TOWERS

NETWORK RAIL BORDERS RAILWAY OPERATIONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION (YEAR 1, ROUND 2) REP-003. September 2016

June Phase 3 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of Candu Energy Inc. Enhanced CANDU 6 Design

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

Demand Side Response Methodology (DSR) for Use after a Gas Deficit Warning (GDW) Background. Draft Business Rules

OPERATING CODE NO. 5 (OC5)

With you from the spark

DEP 2008 ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

Noise Monitoring Program

RESPONSE. SECOND 700 MHz SPECTRUM POLICY CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

D1.10 SECOND ETHICAL REPORT

Non-Technical Summary of Environmental Statement

Melbourne IT Audit & Risk Management Committee Charter

SHTG primary submission process

We appreciate your feedback

Acceptable Work for Registration as a Registered Lifting Machinery Inspector (RegLMI) E C S A

NHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. December 2012 version 7

ETSI EN V1.3.1 ( )

An interpretation of NHS England s Primary Care Co-commissioning: Regional Roadshows questions and answers Rachel Lea, Beds & Herts LMC Ltd

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NETWORK RAIL LIMITED held at The Royal York Hotel, York on Wednesday 15 July 2015 at 11.20am

Well Control Contingency Plan Guidance Note (version 2) 02 December 2015

Standard of Knowledge, Skill and Competence for Practice as an Architectural Technologist

Strategic Transport Forum 7 th December 2018

July Contents. Gas Demand Side Response Methodology Final Version. UK Gas Transmission

STEP Code for Will Preparation in England & Wales

NORTHERN IRELAND TRANSPORT HOLDING COMPANY

Appointment of External Auditors

LAND AT LONG BUCKBY IMMEDIATE RESIDENTIAL LAND 0.42 ha

Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

SYNCHRONISING AND VOLTAGE SELECTION

Aboriginal Consultation and Environmental Assessment Handout CEAA November 2014

FY2013 Indicative Work Programme and Budget Co-regulatory Forum. 18 November 2011

ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AUDIT OVERVIEW

Clinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation

Minute of Meeting of 22 February 2016

Revision of the Public Law Outline

UK Broadband Ltd Spectrum Access Licence Licence Number: Rev: 5: 14 December 2018

Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Governing Body. Establishment of the Association of Greater Manchester CCG s Reporting Officer:

RELEVANT ELECTRICAL STANDARDS

EUROPEAN COMPLIANCE PROCESSES (post RfG Implementation) CONTENTS. (This contents page does not form part of the Grid Code) Paragraph No/Title

Transcription:

Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems This factsheet explains the objectives that are expected to be adopted and the measures that are expected to be put in place to control the effects of noise from the operation of stationary systems designed and installed by the nominated undertaker as part of the Proposed Scheme. It does not cover rail-served or other installations provided by the nominated undertaker for other parties affected by the scheme and not intended for use by the HS2 operator as part of the operational HS2 system. Version 1.0 Last updated: June 2018

1. Introduction 1.1.1. High Speed Two (HS2) is the Government s proposal for a new, high speed north-south railway. The proposal is being taken forward in phases: Phase One will connect London with Birmingham and the West Midlands. Phase 2a will extend the route to Crewe. Phase 2b will extend the route to Manchester, Leeds and beyond (the Proposed Scheme ). 1.1.2. The construction and operation of Phase One of HS2 is authorised by the High Speed Rail (London West Midlands) Act (2017). In July 2017, the Government introduced a hybrid Bill to Parliament to seek powers for the construction and operation of Phase 2a. A hybrid Bill to seek powers for the construction and operation of Phase 2b is expected to be introduced to Parliament in 2019. 1.1.3. HS2 Ltd is the non-departmental public body responsible for developing and promoting these proposals. The company works to a Development Agreement made with the Secretary of State for Transport. 1.1.4. The work to produce the Phase 2b Bill will include an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the results of which will then be reported in an Environmental Statement (ES). The ES would be submitted alongside the Phase 2b Bill when it is introduced to Parliament. As was the case with Phase One and Phase 2a, when the Phase 2b Bill is introduced to Parliament the Secretary of State will also publish draft Environmental Minimum Requirements (EMRs). The EMRs will set out the environmental and sustainability commitments that will be observed in the construction of Phase 2b. 1.1.5. A series of information papers were produced for the Phase One and Phase 2a hybrid Bills, explaining the commitments made in those Bills and EMRs. It is the Secretary of State s intention to follow a similar process for the Phase 2b Bill. These information papers for Phase 2b will be used to provide information about Phase 2b itself, the powers contained in the Phase 2b Bill and how decisions on Phase 2b have been reached. It is currently proposed that these information papers for Phase 2b will be published at the time the Phase 2b Bill is introduced in Parliament. 1.1.6. The Secretary of State for Transport will be the Promoter of the Phase 2b Bill. The Promoter will also eventually appoint a body responsible for delivering the Proposed Scheme under the powers to be granted by the Phase 2b Bill. This body will be known as the nominated undertaker. There may well be more than one nominated undertaker. However, any and all nominated undertakers will be bound by the obligations contained in the Page 2

Phase 2b Bill, the policies established in the Phase 2b EMRs and any commitments provided in the Phase 2b information papers. 1.1.7. These Phase 2b factsheets have been produced to provide information on the emerging proposals for measures to manage the design process for Phase 2b and to control impacts which may arise from the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme. These measures may then be applied to Phase 2b as commitments made through the eventual Phase 2b Bill, EMRs or information papers. 2. Overview 2.1.1. This factsheet explains the objectives that are expected to be adopted and the measures that are expected to be put in place to control the effects of noise from the operation of stationary systems designed and installed by the nominated undertaker as part of the Proposed Scheme. It does not cover rail-served or other installations provided by the nominated undertaker for other parties affected by the scheme and not intended for use by the HS2 operator as part of the operational HS2 system. 2.1.2. The term stationary systems is used to describe the following: tunnel ventilation including; mechanical ventilation at intervention shafts and tunnel portals; and tunnel draught (pressure) relief shafts. trackside equipment (particularly electrical equipment such as autotransformer feeder stations); static equipment located at stations such as mechanical ventilation plant, chillers etc.; and static sources located within depots such as mechanical plant, pumps, carriage wash plant, wheel lathes and stationary trains. 2.1.3. The level and nature of sound produced by all of these systems and the ability to practicably control the sound emissions will vary significantly. Therefore, this factsheet is designed to ensure an appropriate level of consistency in the approach to be applied, whilst ensuring a suitable level of flexibility to address different situations and circumstances. 3. Objectives 3.1.1. The nominated undertaker would design, construct, operate and maintain the stationary systems so that the rating level of the fixed installations in normal operation at the worst affected residential receptor, minus the Page 3

background level, is not more than -5dB, determined in accordance with BS4142:2014. 3.1.2. Where it is not reasonably practicable to achieve this objective, the nominated undertaker would develop and adopt robust procedures to ensure that sound from all stationary systems is reduced as far as is reasonably practicable. 3.1.3. In such cases, the nominated undertaker would design, construct, operate and maintain the stationary systems so that, under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, the rating level of the stationary systems in normal operation at the worst affected residential receptor, minus the existing background level, is not more than +5dB, determined in accordance with BS4142:2014. 3.1.4. The above steps would help to achieve the Government s noise policy (as set out in the Noise Policy Statement for England), in so far as: the steps to be taken to control and reduce adverse effects of noise from stationary systems as far as is reasonably practicable is consistent with HS2 Ltd Environmental Policy and supports the second aim of the Government s noise policy, which is to minimise adverse effects on health and quality of life as far as is sustainable; and specifying noise limits so as to not exceed a rating level of +5dB above the background level would ensure that likely significant effects will be avoided. This would achieve the first aim of the Government s noise policy which is to avoid significant adverse effects on health and quality of life. 3.1.5. Special consideration would be given to the assessment of sound from stationary systems when the background level is low, namely where the background levels are less than 30dB. 3.1.6. For non-residential receptors, the methodology set out in BS4142:2014 is not relevant and does not apply. However, the nominated undertaker would control sound from stationary systems at noise-sensitive non-residential receptors to avoid significant observed adverse effects on that receptor. 4. Control measures 4.1.1. The objectives set out in this factsheet are expected to apply to all stationary systems that affect any noise sensitive receptor. 4.1.2. The nominated undertaker will assess the sound from stationary systems at the nearest residential receptor based on the principles set out in Page 4

BS4142:2014. This methodology requires an assessment of the sound produced by the stationary system under assessment against the background level. 4.1.3. The surveys used to define the background levels will need to be carried out at the time of the detailed design. This will ensure that the background level will be established using up-to-date and robust information. It is expected that the nominated undertaker will undertake the following steps to control noise from the stationary systems: specify noise limits and incorporate acoustic requirements into contract documents such that they will apply to the design of all the stationary systems that are to be installed and operated as part of the Proposed Scheme; determine the relevant background levels and establish these jointly with the relevant local authorities; procure, install and commission stationary systems, including sound attenuation equipment that meets the specification requirements; where it is not possible to achieve the lower design objective (noise rating to be 5dB below the background level), provide details to the relevant local authority (whose comments will be taken into consideration) of the steps to be taken to ensure that, under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, the design and procurement processes for stationary systems are adequate to achieve compliance with the design criteria; and before formal operation of the stationary system, complete a standard suite of acceptance tests as necessary to demonstrate that the operational sound levels achieve the design criteria. 5. More information 5.1.1. Further factsheets and details on the Proposed Scheme can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hs2-phase-2b-crewe-tomanchester-and-the-west-midlands-to-leeds Page 5