Development of A Finger Mounted Type Haptic Device Using A Plane Approximated to Tangent Plane

Similar documents
Development of a Finger Mounted Type Haptic Device Using a Plane Approximated to Tangent Plane

Development a File Transfer Application by Handover for 3D Video Communication System in Synchronized AR Space

Toward an Augmented Reality System for Violin Learning Support

Ungrounded Kinesthetic Pen for Haptic Interaction with Virtual Environments

Evaluation of Visuo-haptic Feedback in a 3D Touch Panel Interface

Magnetic Field of the Earth

Haptic presentation of 3D objects in virtual reality for the visually disabled

Expression of 2DOF Fingertip Traction with 1DOF Lateral Skin Stretch

Touching and Walking: Issues in Haptic Interface

VIRTUAL FIGURE PRESENTATION USING PRESSURE- SLIPPAGE-GENERATION TACTILE MOUSE

Haplug: A Haptic Plug for Dynamic VR Interactions

Evaluation of Five-finger Haptic Communication with Network Delay

Sensor system of a small biped entertainment robot

Touch Feedback in a Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality through a Kinesthetic Haptic Device

ITS '14, Nov , Dresden, Germany

Shopping Together: A Remote Co-shopping System Utilizing Spatial Gesture Interaction

Augmented Reality Lecture notes 01 1

ISMCR2004. Abstract. 2. The mechanism of the master-slave arm of Telesar II. 1. Introduction. D21-Page 1

Tele-Nursing System with Realistic Sensations using Virtual Locomotion Interface

Appendix C: Graphing. How do I plot data and uncertainties? Another technique that makes data analysis easier is to record all your data in a table.

DC Motor Control using Fuzzy Logic Controller for Input to Five Bar Planar Mechanism

PHYSICS-BASED INTERACTIONS IN VIRTUAL REALITY MAX LAMMERS LEAD SENSE GLOVE

Development of Shape-Variable Hand Unit for Quadruped Tracked Mobile Robot

Test Yourself. 11. The angle in degrees between u and w. 12. A vector parallel to v, but of length 2.

Exam 1 Study Guide. Math 223 Section 12 Fall Student s Name

i + u 2 j be the unit vector that has its initial point at (a, b) and points in the desired direction. It determines a line in the xy-plane:

the input values of a function. These are the angle values for trig functions

MATH 259 FINAL EXAM. Friday, May 8, Alexandra Oleksii Reshma Stephen William Klimova Mostovyi Ramadurai Russel Boney A C D G H B F E

Modeling and Experimental Studies of a Novel 6DOF Haptic Device

Application of 3D Terrain Representation System for Highway Landscape Design

HAPTIC BASED ROBOTIC CONTROL SYSTEM ENHANCED WITH EMBEDDED IMAGE PROCESSING

AC : A HAPTICS-ENABLED REHABILITATION DESIGN PROJECT FOR A CONTROL SYSTEMS COURSE

How to Configure IFOV. Revision: 1.01

Vocabulary Game Using Augmented Reality Expressing Elements in Virtual World with Objects in Real World

Mirrors and Lenses. Images can be formed by reflection from mirrors. Images can be formed by refraction through lenses.

Immersive Authoring of Tangible Augmented Reality Applications

Peter Berkelman. ACHI/DigitalWorld

HeroX - Untethered VR Training in Sync'ed Physical Spaces

E90 Project Proposal. 6 December 2006 Paul Azunre Thomas Murray David Wright

THE SIX SIMPLE MACHINES

The Mathematics of the Stewart Platform

Multi-touch Interface for Controlling Multiple Mobile Robots

Salient features make a search easy

3D interaction techniques in Virtual Reality Applications for Engineering Education

Ubiquitous Computing Summer Episode 16: HCI. Hannes Frey and Peter Sturm University of Trier. Hannes Frey and Peter Sturm, University of Trier 1

Moving Obstacle Avoidance for Mobile Robot Moving on Designated Path

CSE 165: 3D User Interaction. Lecture #7: Input Devices Part 2

PRODUCTS DOSSIER. / DEVELOPMENT KIT - VERSION NOVEMBER Product information PAGE 1

266&deployment= &UserPass=b3733cde68af274d036da170749a68f6

Benefits of using haptic devices in textile architecture

Theory and Practice of Tangible User Interfaces Tuesday, Week 9

Modeling and Simulation of the Knife Movement for Veneer Lathe. Guang-ming XIONG and Li-jun GUO

Contents. Magnetic Motion Capture System Application for Posture Measurement Application for Dexterous Finger Measurement.

LOOKING AHEAD: UE4 VR Roadmap. Nick Whiting Technical Director VR / AR

Multi touch Vector Field Operation for Navigating Multiple Mobile Robots

Grade 7 Mathematics Item Specifications Florida Standards Assessments

DATA GLOVES USING VIRTUAL REALITY

MATH Review Exam II 03/06/11

Occlusion based Interaction Methods for Tangible Augmented Reality Environments

The Optimal Design for Grip Force of Material Handling

Beyond Visual: Shape, Haptics and Actuation in 3D UI

reactive boxes

Parallel Robot Projects at Ohio University

The Haptic Perception of Spatial Orientations studied with an Haptic Display

Touch & Haptics. Touch & High Information Transfer Rate. Modern Haptics. Human. Haptics

TOUCH & FEEL VIRTUAL REALITY. DEVELOPMENT KIT - VERSION NOVEMBER 2017

Design and Implementation of the 3D Real-Time Monitoring Video System for the Smart Phone

THE SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM

Ubiquitous Home Simulation Using Augmented Reality

Development of Informal Communication Environment Using Interactive Tiled Display Wall Tetsuro Ogi 1,a, Yu Sakuma 1,b

MRT: Mixed-Reality Tabletop

Proprioception & force sensing

Lecture 1: Introduction to haptics and Kinesthetic haptic devices

MATHEMATICS: PAPER II

Introduction to Trigonometry. Algebra 2

CSE 165: 3D User Interaction. Lecture #11: Travel

IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) e-issn: , p-issn: , Volume 2, Issue 11 (November 2012), PP 37-43

Head Tracker Range Checking

Efficiency of Cooperation between Human and Remote Robot System with Force Feedback

APPEAL DECISION. Appeal No USA. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan

The Haptic Impendance Control through Virtual Environment Force Compensation

Flexibility of Contactless Power Transfer using Magnetic Resonance

FORCE FEEDBACK. Roope Raisamo

Proposal for the Object Oriented Display : The Design and Implementation of the MEDIA 3

The Ominidirectional Attention Funnel: A Dynamic 3D Cursor for Mobile Augmented Reality Systems

Development of Onboard Ship Manoeuvring Simulators and their Application to Onboard Training

Hapkit: Open Hardware and Software for Haptics Integrated with MATLAB

Dynamic Platform for Virtual Reality Applications

UNIT Explain the radiation from two-wire. Ans: Radiation from Two wire

Converging and Diverging Surfaces. Lenses. Converging Surface

Development of Video Chat System Based on Space Sharing and Haptic Communication

Z Axis Check & Adjustment (MVX Class Machines)

AMCON LENSOMETER USER S MANUAL EQ Fax

ENGINEERING GRAPHICS ESSENTIALS

An Implementation Review of Occlusion-Based Interaction in Augmented Reality Environment

Experiment 4.B. Position Control. ECEN 2270 Electronics Design Laboratory 1

An Excavator Simulator for Determining the Principles of Operator Efficiency for Hydraulic Multi-DOF Systems Mark Elton and Dr. Wayne Book ABSTRACT

The Shape-Weight Illusion

Interactive intuitive mixed-reality interface for Virtual Architecture

Haptic Feedback in Mixed-Reality Environment

Transcription:

Development of A Finger Mounted Type Haptic Device Using A Plane Approximated to Tangent Plane Makoto Yoda Department of Information System Science Graduate School of Engineering Soka University, Soka Univ. Tokyo, Japan e-mail:e16m5223@soka-u.jp Hiroki Imamura Department of Information System Science Graduate School of Engineering Soka University, Soka Univ. Tokyo, Japan e-mail:imamura@soka.ac.jp Abstract In recent years, several researches of haptic devices have been conducted. By using conventional haptic devices, users can perceive touching an object, such as Computer Graphics (CG) by a force feedback. Since conventional haptic devices provide a force feedback from a single point on an object surface where users touch it, users touch an object by point contact. However, conventional haptic devices cannot provide users with a sense such as humans touching an object with a finger pad because a finger pad does not touch an object by point contact but surface contact in reality. In this paper, we propose a novel haptic device. By using this haptic device, users can perceive the slope of a surface when they put fingers on it without tracing. Moreover, users can perceive grabbing a with finger pads. To grab, we mount the plane interface of the haptic device on each two fingers. Then, users can perceive the slope of a surface where users are touching. Each plane interface provides users with the slope approximated to a tangent plane of area where they touched. In the evaluation experiments, the subjects in this experiment evaluated this haptic device. From the results, the subjects could perceive the slope of a surface. In addition, they could perceive grabbing a. Keywords-haptic device; plane interface; force feedback. I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, researches of human interface using Augmented Reality (AR) have been conducted. In order to touch s that are drawn by AR, haptic devices have been developed. By using a haptic device, users can perceive touching s by processing a force feedback. Therefore, haptic devices are expected to be used in applications such as remote control of robots and computer games. Examples of conventional haptic devices include Falcon [1], PHANToM [2] and Dexmo [3]. Falcon and PHANToM are classified into a grounded type. This type can provide users with accurate force feedback because its fulcrum is fixed on the table. Dexmo is classified into a finger mounted type. This type can provide users with perception of grabbing s easily. In addition, users can operate the device without operating range limitation. These haptic devices have been developed as a point contact haptic device. By using this type of haptic device, users can perceive touching s because they are provided with a force feedback from a single point on the surface where they touched. In case of perception of an objects shape, from visual information, users perceive s shape of visible part. As invisible part, users must perceive CG objects shape by touching the surface. However, in a point contact type, to perceive s shape, users must trace the surface because they perceive only touching s. Therefore, they cannot work smoothly in that part. In order to perceive s shape without tracing the surface, the direction of a force feedback must change according to a surface shape where users touched. Our laboratory focused on this characteristic. In addition, our laboratory has developed a haptic device based on an approximated plane (HaAP) [4] that is shown in Figure 1. HaAP is a grounded type. Moreover, HaAP is a surface contact type haptic device which has a plane interface that is shown in Figure 1-(a). Since as shown in Figure 1-(b), the plane interface provides users with a force feedback by being approximated to the tangent plane on a surface where they touched, users can perceive the shape from the surface slope without tracing the surface. In this device, users are limited to operate HaAP in range of the HaAP vertical mechanism within 10 cm. Vertical mechanism (a). Appearance of HaAP Plane interface Figure 1. HaAP. (b). Operating state Finger In this paper, we propose a novel haptic device. This haptic device realizes three things. First, users are provided with a force feedback by the plane interface providing the 436

slope approximated to the tangent plane on a surface. Second, users can operate this haptic device without operating range limitation. Third, by using this haptic device, users can perceive grabbing a. To realize that, we develop a haptic device having characteristics of a finger mounted type and a surface contact type. This paper is structured as follows: First, the outline of the proposed haptic device is explained in section II. In section III, the hardware construction, the system overview and the system flowchart are proposed. Evaluation experiments are carried out for the proposed haptic device in section IV. Finally, conclusions and future works end this paper. II. OUR APPROACH Figure 2 shows the outline of the proposed haptic device. This device uses a plane interface having four movable points. These four movable points operate up and down separately. The plane interface is not providing a force feedback Finger Movable Points (a). Initial state (b). Operating state Figure 2. Outline of the proposedhaptic device. Figure 2-(a) shows the initial state. In this state, the user is not touching a. Figure 2-(b) shows the operating state. In this state, the user is touching a. The plane interface provides a finger pad with a force feedback by approximating the tangent plane on the. III. Plane interface The plane interface is providing a force feedback CG Object THE PROPOSED SYSTEM Force feedback A. Hardware condtruction Figure 3 shows the appearance of the proposed haptic device. Wire Motor Hand Plane type Interface Fulcrum Part Wire springs and a plane interface for each finger. Eight motors are mounted in the back of the hand. In addition, each motor is connected to Arduino Uno for the index finger and Arduino Uno for the thumb, respectively. Arduino Uno controls four motors in each finger. These motors pull up the movable points of the plane interface with wires. When motors pull up, wires hang at the fulcrum part. Each spring adheres to each movable point. B. System overview Figure 4 shows the system overview. This system consists of PC, Display, Web-Camera and the proposed haptic device. The user attaches markers on fingers and wears the proposed haptic device. Figure 4. System overview. C. The system flowchart Figure 5 shows the system flowchart. The following is the explanation about processing flow in this system. In the following section, we explain each process in the flowchart. No Markers on the Finger User Haptic Device Display Hand Start (1)Initialization of the haptic device (2)Drawing a (3)Detecting finger position and posture (4)Does the finger contact with the? Web-Camera CG Object Reference Marker Yes (5)Calculation of the motor rotation angle (6)Controlling motors PC Arduino for the Index Finger Arduino for the Thumb Part of Fixing Finger Springs Figure 3. Appearance of the proposed haptic device. This device is a glove type and composed of Arduino Uno, four servo motors (GWS Servo PIC+F/BB/F), four End? Yes End Figure 5. Flowchart. No 437

1) Initialization of the haptic device: Arduino Uno controls motors to make springs natural length. 2) Drawing a : Based on the reference marker, ARToolkit [5] draws Sphere or Sin-cos curve CG object that is shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. 4) Judgement of contact: In the case of a Sphere CG object, as shown in Figure 9, when the length between the marker on the finger position and the center of Sphere CG object is within radius of Sphere, the system judges contact. Figure 6. Sphere Figure 9. Touching Sphere In case of Sin-cos curve, the system calculates -coordinate on Sin-cos curve. The following is the equation of Sin-cos curve. A sin X cos Y =, (1) Figure 7. Sin-cos where A is amplitude and X, Y and are X, Y and - coordinate on Sin-cos curve. By substituting X and Y-coordinate of the marker on the finger for this equation, the system obtains. As shown in Figure 10, when -coordinate of the marker on the finger is under, the system judges contact. 3) Detecting finger position and posture: Figure 8 shows detecting the marker on each finger position and posture. The system recognizes the reference marker and the marker on each finger from the image that is captured by the web camera. By using ARToolKit, the system obtains position (X,Y,) of the marker on each finger from the reference marker. In addition, by using ARToolKit, the system also calculates F r that denotes the roll angle and F p that denotes the pitch angle of the marker on each finger. Figure 10. Touching Sin-cos curve. Web-camera Marker on the finger Reference marker(position(0,0,0)) Position(X,Y,) from reference marker Figure 8. Detecting the finger position and posture. 5) Calculation of the motor rotation angle: The system calculates the normal vector on touching point. In case of a Sphere, the vector from the center of Sphere to the touching point is defined as the normal vector on the touching point. In case of Sin-cos curve, Sin-cos curve CG object is composed of many planes. Figure 11 shows calculation of the normal vector on the touching point. The system uses the equation of vector product N = A B, (2) 438

where A and B are the vectors from the touching point to other points on the plane that includes the contact point. The system obtains the normal vector from right hand screw rule. Surface of Sin curve N D p = T p F p, (5) D r = T r F r. (6) This difference is the plane interface slope that is shown in Figure 13. F p and F r are shown in Figure 8. Figure 13-(a) shows D p that denotes the difference between F p and T p. Figure 13-(b) shows D r that denotes the difference between F r and T r. Contact point B A Right hand screw rule in Y- plane D p Figure 11. Calculation of the normal vector. T p From the normal vector, the system calculates the roll angle and the pitch angle of the tangent plane on touching point. Figure 12 shows the calculation of the tangent plane slope on touching point in X- plane and Y- plane. The system uses T p = 90 θ y, (3) surface Y F p T r = 90 θ x (4) (a). Difference of the pitch angle. to obtain the roll and pitch angle of the tangent plane. θ x denotes the angle between x-axis and the normal vector and θ y denotes the angle between y-axis and the normal vector. Using (3) and (4), the system obtains T r that denotes the roll angle of tangent plane and T p that denotes the pitch angle of the tangent plane. in X- plane D r T r X F r surface (b). Difference of the roll angle. Figure 13. Calculation of the plane interface slope. The system calculates the operation length of movable point from the plane interface slope. Figure 14 shows two lengths (L1 and L2). These two lengths are defined L1 = A 2 sin( D p ) + A 2 sin( D r ), (7) L1 = A 2 sin( D p ) A 2 sin( D r ) (8) Figure 12. Calculation of the tangent plane angle. Using equations (5) and (6), the system calculates the difference between the angle of the marker on the finger and that of the tangent plane. as the operation length of movable points. Where A is the length of one side on a plane interface. Using (7) and (8), the system calculates these lengths. 439

L1 L2 A Plane interface in the operating state Plane interface in the initial state Figure 14. The operation length of movable points. Figure 15 shows the angle of motor rotation. The system uses in X- plane (b). X- plane. X Plane interface Sphere A1 = 2 sin 1 ( L1 ), (9) 2 R A2 = 2 sin 1 ( L2 2 R ) (10) to calculate the angle of motor rotation, where R denotes the length of servo horn. A1 and A2 are the amount of controlling motors. The system sends this amount to each Arduino Uno by serial communication. The operation length of movable point(l1 or L2) Y Plane Interface in X- plane (c).y- plane. Sin curve in Y- plane The length of servo horn R The angle of motor rotation(a1 or A2) X Plane interface Sin curve Motor Figure 15. The angle of motor rotation. 6) Controlling the motors: Arduino Uno receives the amount of controlling motors and controls motors. Motors pull up each movable point with wires. Figure 16-(a) and (b) shows providing a finger with a force feedback when users touched Sphere in Y- plane and X- plane respectively. Figure 16-(c) and (d) shows providing a finger with a force feedback when users touched Sin-cos curve CG object in Y- plane and X- plane respectively. in Y- plane Plane interface Y Sphere (d). X- plane. Figure 16. The plane interface that provides a force feedback. IV. EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS A. Overview of the experiments We had an evaluation experiment for the proposed haptic device. Sin-cos curve is used in order to evaluate whether users can perceive the slope of the CG object surface or not. In addition, a Sphere is used in order to evaluate whether users can perceive grabbing a or not. Eleven subjects used the proposed haptic device. After that, they evaluated following items with a 5-grade score: In case of Sin-cos, When you touched the with one finger, you perceived the slope of the surface at once (Item1). When you touched and traced the surface of the CG object with one finger, you perceived the asperity of the surface (Item2). In case of Sphere, (a). Y- plane. 440

When you touched the with one finger, you perceived the slope of sphericity (Item1). When you touched and traced the surface of the CG object with one finger, you perceived the shape of sphericity (Item2). When you touched the with two fingers, you perceived touching the (Item3). When you touched the with two fingers, you perceived grabbing the (Item4). Evaluation values are from 1 to 5 (1 : Strongly disagree, 2 : Disagree, 3 : Neutral, 4 : Agree, 5 : Strongly agree ). B. Discussion Table 1 shows the results of Sin-cos curve. Table 2 shows the results of Sphere. Each result shows the average score and the standard deviation. TABLE I. RESULTS OF SIN-COS CURVE CG OBJECT Item Sin-cos curve Average score A standard deviation 1 4.64 0.64 2 4.55 0.50 TABLE II. RESULTS OF SPHERE CG OBJECT Item Sphere Average score A standard deviation 1 4.09 0.90 2 4.00 0.85 3 4.18 0.94 4 4.27 0.96 From these results, in Item1 of Tables 1 and 2, we see that users perceived the slope of without tracing the surface. In Item2 of Tables 1 and 2, the results show that users perceived the asperity by tracing the surface. In addition, in Item3 and Item4 of Table 2, we see that users perceived grabbing a. Therefore, we consider that the proposed haptic device can provide users with perception of the surface slope. Moreover, we consider that users can perceive grabbing a by using the proposed haptic device. In addition, from Tables 1 and 2, we see that the average score in Table 1 is higher than that in Table 2. Since the surface of Sin-cos curve CG object is more complex than that of Sphere, the accuracy of the proposed haptic device is improved when have complex surface. V. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS In this paper, we proposed a novel haptic device. The proposed haptic device has a plane interface to provide a slope approximated to the tangent plane of the area where users touched. In addition, to perceive grabbing a, the proposed haptic device is designed as a finger mounted type. After evaluation experiments, we see that the proposed haptic device can provide users with perception of the surface slope without tracing the surface and perception of grabbing the. However, we consider that users cannot grasp the sense of the distance between finger and a easily. To solve the issue, we improve the proposed haptic device to grasp the sense of the distance more easily by using Head Mounted Display (HMD). In the future, we will improve the operability of the proposed haptic device by lightening the device. In addition, by using Leap Motion, we will improve the accuracy of detecting finger position and posture. REFERENCES [1] Novint Technologies, Inc, http://www.novint.com/index.php/ novintfalcon (last accessed March, 2016) [2] Geomagin, Inc, http://www.geomagic.com/en/products/phant om-desktop/overview (last accessed March, 2016) [3] Dexta Robotics, Inc, http://www.dextarobotics.com/products /dexmo (last accessed March, 2016) [4] A. Kawazoe, K. Ikeshiro, and H. Imamura, A Haptic Device based on An Approximate Plane HaAP. ACM Siggraph Asia 2013 Posters, 2013, Hong Kong. CD-ROM. [5] H. Kato, ARToolKit:Library for Vision-based Augmented Reality, Technical report of IEICE, PRMU, 101(625), 2002, pp.79-86. 441