ELC RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 6: Quadrature Hybrid Coupler

Similar documents
ELC 4383 RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 7: Microstrip Coupled-Line Coupler

ELC 4383 RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 4: Quarter-Wave Impedance Matching Network

ELC 4383 RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 8: Lumped-Element Low-Pass Filter

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

ADS Application Notes. The Design of Oscillator Using ADS

Experiment 3 - Printed Filters.

Ansoft Designer Tutorial ECE 584 October, 2004

Original Procedure by University of South Florida, Modified by Baylor University.

Millimeter Wave Electronics. Spring Assignment Week 7-8 Power Amplifier Design. Due: Tuesday, June 10, 9:45 11:45 a.m.

EEE 161 Applied Electromagnetics Laboratory 7 Microstrip Lines and PCB fabrication

Design and Optimization of Lumped Element Hybrid Couplers

An automatic antenna matching method for monostatic FMCW radars

EE 210 Lab Exercise #3 Introduction to PSPICE

ECE 145A and 218A. Transmission-line properties, impedance-matching exercises

LAB EXERCISE 3 FET Amplifier Design and Linear Analysis

ECE 585 Microwave Engineering II Lecture 16 Supplemental Notes. Modeling the Response of a FET Amplifier Using Ansoft Designer K.

Schematic-Level Transmission Line Models for the Pyramid Probe

Experiment 9: Microwave Directional Couplers and Hybrids

Application Note 5446

Design of 14 GHz Frequency Synthesizer using Dielectric Resonator Oscillator. spring Microwave and MM-wave Lab.

ECE4902 Lab 5 Simulation. Simulation. Export data for use in other software tools (e.g. MATLAB or excel) to compare measured data with simulation

Microwave Circuit Design: Lab 5

Novel Dual Balun / Coupler Is Space Saving Semi-Lumped.

This chapter shows various ways of creating matching networks by sweeping values and using optimization. Lab 5: Matching & Optimization

SMT Hybrid Couplers, RF Parameters and Applications

Bachelor Thesis. Analogue Phase-Shifter Circuit for 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Tomograph (MRT)

(a) The insertion loss is the average value of the transmission coefficient, S12 (db), in the passband (Figure 1 Label A)

ELC 4396 RF/Microwave Circuits I Fall 2011 Final Exam December 9, 2011 Open Book/Open Notes 2 hours

RF/Microwave Circuits I. Introduction Fall 2003

EE431/531 Microwave Circuit Design I: Lab 3

EXPERIMENT NUMBER 10 TRANSIENT ANALYSIS USING PSPICE

Calibration and De-Embedding Techniques in the Frequency Domain

Chapter 4 Transmission Line Transformers and Hybrids Introduction

Designing Stability into 1296 MHz and 2304 MHz Low Noise Amplifiers

Using LTSPICE to Analyze Circuits

Laboratory Assignment: EM Numerical Modeling of a Monopole

14:332:223 Principles of Electrical Engineering I Instructions for using PSPICE Tools Sharanya Chandrasekar February 1, 2006

Chapter 2 Computer Simulation

Lab 1: Non-Ideal Operational Amplifier and Op-Amp Circuits

Lab 1: Non-Ideal Operational Amplifier and Op-Amp Circuits

Design Project #1: Matching Transformers

Circuit Characterization with the Agilent 8714 VNA

Advanced Design System - Fundamentals. Mao Wenjie

Power Electronics Laboratory-2 Uncontrolled Rectifiers

Design and Simulation of RF CMOS Oscillators in Advanced Design System (ADS)

Experiment 10 - Power Amplier Measurements Using Vector Network Analyzer

PHYC 500: Introduction to LabView. Exercise 9 (v 1.1) Spectral content of waveforms. M.P. Hasselbeck, University of New Mexico

Design of Frequency Synthesizer at 400 MHz Band

ECE 4670 Spring 2014 Lab 1 Linear System Characteristics

EXPERIMENT EM3 INTRODUCTION TO THE NETWORK ANALYZER

The Challenges of Differential Bus Design

Keysight EEsof EDA Microwave Discrete and Microstrip Filter Design. Demo Guide

Equivalent Circuit Description for SMD-Components

Upon successful completion of this course, the student should be competent to perform the following tasks:

Microwave Circuit Design and Measurements Lab. MATCHING NETWORK DESIGN AND CIRCUIT LAYOUT Lab #8

EE432/532 Microwave Circuit Design II: Lab 1

II. LAB. * Open the LabVIEW program (Start > All Programs > National Instruments > LabVIEW 2012 > LabVIEW 2012)

6-33. Mixer IF. IF Amp LO. Transmitter

Sept 13 Pre-lab due Sept 12; Lab memo due Sept 19 at the START of lab time, 1:10pm

Pre-LAB 5 Assignment

EE 210: CIRCUITS AND DEVICES

Passive Circuit DesignGuide

A 400, 900, and 1800 MHz Buffer/Driver Amplifier using the HBFP-0450 Silicon Bipolar Transistor

Gain Compression Simulation

Relevant Projects. RF-Thermal characterization of MEMS devices. High power GaN arrays for power beaming

Introduction to Pspice

Waveform Generators and Oscilloscopes. Lab 6

Lab Reference Manual. ECEN 326 Electronic Circuits. Texas A&M University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

System Level Design Review

Experiment Number 1. Revised: Fall 2018 Introduction to MATLAB Simulink and Simulink Resistor Simulations Preface:

Vector Network Analyzers (VERY) Basics. Tom Powers USPAS SRF Testing Course 19 Jan. 2014

Activity P52: LRC Circuit (Voltage Sensor)

Application Note 1131

Network Analyzer and Network Analysis

Performance analysis of Wilkinson power divider and Miniaturized Wilkinson Power Divider at centre Frequency 2.14 GHz

EE4101E: RF Communications. Low Noise Amplifier Design Using ADS (Report)

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment: Wilkinson power divider (3-port board with oval-shaped trace on it)

Low Noise Amplifiers with High Dynamic Range

Experiment Number 2. Revised: Summer 2013 PLECS RC, RL, and RLC Simulations

Lab 9 Frequency Domain

Genesys 2012 Tutorial 2 - Using Momentum Analysis for Microwave Planar Circuits: Circuit and EM Co-Simulation

ADS Application Notes. The Components Characterization Using ADS

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING. Date: Assistant A2: PSpice 2 PC Pool

Experiment Number 2. Revised: Fall 2018 PLECS RC, RL, and RLC Simulations

ADS APPLICATION IN FILTER DESIGN. EKT 345 Microwave Engineering

RF Circuit Synthesis for Physical Wireless Design

ELE3310 Basic Electromagnetics Lab Session 1

ECE3042 Lab Report and Homework Guidelines. Homework. Lab Report

29:128 Homework Problems

Atlanta RF Services, Software & Designs. Insertion Loss: Double Ridge Waveguide

Agilent 86030A 50 GHz Lightwave Component Analyzer Product Overview

Fig. 1. NI Elvis System

A graph is an effective way to show a trend in data or relating two variables in an experiment.

Substrate Libraries Ease PCB Simulations

80GHz Notch Filter Design

Time Domain Reflectometer Example

Introduction to PSpice

Sheet Metal Punch ifeatures

ITT Technical Institute. ET275 Electronic Communications Systems I Onsite Course SYLLABUS

ECE 220 Laboratory 3 Thevenin Equivalent Circuits, Constant Current Source, and Inverting Amplifier

Transcription:

1 ELC 4383 -RF/Microwave Circuits I Laboratory 6: Quadrature Hybrid Coupler Note: This lab procedure has been adapted from a procedure written by Dr. Larry Dunleavy and Dr. Tom Weller at the University of South Florida for the WAMI program in the RF/Microwave Circuits I course and from related procedures written for the WAMI Laboratory. It has been modified for use at Baylor University by Dr. Charles Baylis. Printed Name: Please read the reminder on general policies and sign the statement below. Attach this page to your Post-Laboratory report. General Policies for Completing Laboratory Assignments: For each laboratory assignment you will also have to complete a Post-Laboratory report. For this report, you are strongly encouraged to collaborate with classmates and discuss the results, but the descriptions and conclusions must be completed individually. You will be graded primarily on the quality of the technical content, not the quantity or style of presentation. Your reports should be neat, accurate and concise (the Summary portion must be less than one page). Laboratory reports are due the week following the laboratory experiment, unless notified otherwise, and should be turned in at the start of the laboratory period. See the syllabus and/or in-class instructions for additional instructions regarding the report format. This laboratory report represents my own work, completed according to the guidelines described above. I have not improperly used previous semester laboratory reports, or cheated in any other way. Signed:

2 ELC 4383--RF/Microwave CIrcuits I Laboratory 6: Quadrature Hybrid Coupler Laboratory Assignment: Overview In this laboratory assignment, you will design and simulate a quadrature hybrid coupler. You will first simulate an ideal coupler using transmission line models. Second, you will simulate a real coupler using microstrip line elements. You will then modify the dimensions of the microstrip design to emulate the ideal results as closely as possible. Procedure A. Ideal Coupler 1. Open ADS and create ne new schematic, titled quad_ideal_1_4port.dsn. 2. Create a schematic for the quadrature hybrid coupler using ideal transmission lines. Your design frequency for the coupler will be 2.5 GHz. The TLIN (ideal transmission line) elements are available from the TLines-Ideal Palette. Make sure your ports are numbered appropriately as shown below: P1 Num=1 Var Eqn VAR VAR1 fc=2.5 Zo_tb=35.35 Zo_lr=50 theta_tb=90 theta_lr=90 TLIN TL4 Z=Zo_lr Ohm E=theta_lr F=fc GHz TLIN TL2 Z=Zo_tb Ohm E=theta_tb F=fc GHz TLIN TL3 Z=Zo_lr Ohm E=theta_lr F=fc GHz P2 Num=2 P4 Num=4 TLIN TL1 Z=Zo_tb Ohm E=theta_tb F=fc GHz P3 Num=3 Figure 1: Ideal quadrature hybrid coupler schematic

3 B. Higher-Level Schematic Term Term4 Num=4 Z=50 Ohm S-PARAMETERS Term Term1 Num=1 Z=50 Ohm quad_ideal_1_4port X1 Term Term2 Num=2 Z=50 Ohm S_Param SP1 Start=1.0 GHz Stop=8 GHz Step= Term Term3 Num=3 Z=50 Ohm Figure 2: Higher level schematic with 50 Ohm terminations and s-parameter simulation block 1. Create a new schematic, to be used as the higher level, called quad_main_1.dsn. 2. Add a reference to the coupler network created with ideal transmission line elements in the previous section (quad_ideal_1_4port). 3. Attach 50 ohm terminations to the four ports of the network. Make sure your termination numbers match the port numbers. 4. Add an S-parameter simulation block to allow simulation from 1 GHz to 8 GHz in steps of 0.05 GHz. 5. Simulate the circuit.

4-3 -4 m1 m2 db(s(3,1)) db(s(2,1)) -5-6 -7-8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m1 freq= 1.750GHz db(s(3,1))=-4.041 freq, GHz m2 freq= 3.250GHz db(s(3,1))=-4.041 Figure 3: Graph of S21 and S31 with markers at -4dB 6. Determine the bandwidth for which S21 and S31 are greater than or equal to -4 db by using markers. You can place a marker on your plot that will show the y-axis value for the corresponding x-axis value at which it is placed by selecting Marker New and then clicking on the trace. Record the bandwidth values here and include the plot with verifying markers in your report. NOTE: ONLY LIST THE BANDWIDTH IN THE 2.5 GHZ REGION. YOU MAY SEE ANOTHER BAND FOR WHICH THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE SATISFIED, BUT DO NOT INCLUDE IT IN THE NUMBERS GIVEN IN STEPS 6 AND 7. Bandwidth for which S21-4 db = Bandwidth for which S31-4 db = 7. Determine the bandwidth over which the isolation is greater than or equal to 20 db: Remember that the isolation can be measured by S41. Bandwidth for which Isolation 20 db = 8. Add a plot displaying the phase of S21 and S31 in degrees. 9. Place the plots of the S-parameter magnitudes (with markers) and the phase of S21 and S31 into your report. 10. Between what two frequencies is the phase difference between S21 and S31 within +/- 5 degrees of 90 degrees (keep in mind that you will have to account for the fact that all angles are plotted between - 180 degrees and 180 degrees)?

5 f1 = f2 = 11. Disconnect the termination from port 4 and deactivate it. Replace it with a grounded 50 Ω resistor. 12. Re-simulate the circuit. You will need to delete the S41 parameters from the plots. How do the the S11, S21, and S31 results differ from the previous simulation. How do S11, S21, and S31 change in magnitude and phase? 13. Change the value of the resistor to 0 Ω. Does the circuit still function as a coupler at the design frequency of 2.5 GHz? How does the circuit s behavior change as you move away from the design frequency compared to the previous case? How do these results confirm or contradict the presence of isolation between port 1 and port 4? 14. Delete the resistor and reconnect the Term4 element. Re-simulate and S41 back to the appropriate plots. 15. Save your display window. C. Microstrip Coupler 1. Create a new schematic with the title quad_real_1_4port.dsn. 2. Place a microstrip substrate (MSUB) element into the schematic, and change the parameters to those shown below. Notice that many of the settings are expressed in mils.

6 MSub MSUB MSub1 H=10.0 mil Er=9.6 Mur=1 Cond=1.0E+50 Hu=3.9e+034 mil T=1.7 mil TanD=0.005 Rough=0 mm Figure 4: Microstrip line substrate parameters 3. Start Linecalc by going to Tools Linecalc Start Linecalc. The Linecalc pop-up window will appear. 4. Adjust the transmission line settings to match those of the MSUB element you placed in the schematic. Determine and record the following dimensions for use in setting up your microstrip coupler: Width of a 50 Ω microstrip line = mm Physical length of a 50 Ω microstrip line that is 90 degrees long at 2.5 GHz = mm Width of a 35.3 Ω microstrip line = mm Physical length of a 35.3 Ω microstrip line that is 90 degrees long at 2.5 GHz = mm 5. Save the Linecalc setup for later use using File Save As. Close Linecalc and return to the schematic window. 6. Add a Var block to the microstrip quadrature coupler schematic. The following variables should be specified: W_tb = the width of the microstrip lines on the top and bottom branches of the coupler (as found by your Linecalc simulations) W_lr = the width of the microstrip lines on the left and right branches of the coupler W_50 = the width of a 50 Ω microstrip line L_tb = the length of the microstrip lines on the top and bottom branches L_lr = the length of the microstrip lines on the left and right branches

7 Keep in mind that W_lr should equal W_50 because the left and right lines are 50 Ω lines. 7. Create the coupler layout using the Tlines-Microstrip palette. Use MLIN and MTEE elements. 8. Add ports to the network, numbering the ports appropriately. 9. Obtain a copy of the completed schematic, including the VAR block, for your report. The construction of the microstrip coupler for simulations should appear as follows: P1 Num=1 MTEE_ADS Tee1 W1=W_50 mm W2=W_tb mm W3=W_lr mm MLIN TL1 W=W_tb mm L=L_tb mm MTEE_ADS Tee2 W1=W_tb mm W2=W_50 mm W3=W_lr mm P2 Num=2 MLIN TL2 W=W_lr mm L=L_lr mm MLIN TL3 W=W_lr mm L=L_lr mm P4 Num=4 MTEE_ADS Tee4 W1=W_tb mm W2=W_50 mm W3=W_lr mm MLIN TL4 W=W_tb mm L=L_tb mm MTEE_ADS Tee3 W1=W_50 mm W2=W_tb mm W3=W_lr mm P3 Num=3 Figure 5: Microstrip quadrature hybrid coupler schematic D. Analysis and Optimization of the Microstrip Quadrature Coupler 1. Return to the higher-level schematic and add a reference to the microstrip quadrature coupler schematic (quad_real_1_4port). Add 50 ohm terminations to each port with appropriate numbering. Allow Term5 to correspond with 1 of the lower-level schematic, Term 6 to 2, etc. 2. Perform and S-parameter simulation. Add two new plots to the previously used display window. Display S55, S65, S75, and S85 in db format in the first plot, setting the y-axis minimum to -40 db and the maximum to 0 db. In the second plot, display the phase of all of these S-parameters. 3. Record the magnitude and phase values of these 4 S-parameters at 2.5 GHz. They correspond to the measured S11, S21, S31, and S41 of the microstrip coupler: S11 (db) of Microstrip Coupler = <S11 (degrees) = S21 (db) of Microstrip Coupler = <S21 (degrees) = S31 (db) of Microstrip Coupler = <S31 (degrees) = S41 (db) of Microstrip Coupler = <S41 (degrees) =

8 4. Add another plot to the display window that shows the magnitude of the diference between the S- parameters of the ideal coupler and the microstrip coupler. After dragging the plot into the window, select Advanced in the Plot Traces and Attributes menu. Enter the following in the blank area: mag(s(1,1) S(5,5)). Click on OK. Also add the following expressions: mag(s(2,1) S(6,5)), mag (S(3,1)-S(7,5)), and mag (S(4,1) S(8,5)). Exit the dialog window and view the plot. 0.12 0.10 mag(s(4,1)-s(8,5)) mag(s(3,1)-s(7,5)) mag(s(2,1)-s(6,5)) mag(s(1,1)-s(5,5)) 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 freq, GHz Figure 6: Real and Ideal quadrature hybrid coupler simulation magnitude differences 5. Use markers in the plot to find the values of the 4 magnitude differences and record them below: mag(s(1,1) S(5,5)) = mag(s(2,1) S(6,5)) = mag(s(3,1) S(7,5)) = mag(s(4,1) S(8,5)) = 6. Place a copy of the plots in the display window in your report. 7. Return to the higher-level schematic. Add optimization goals to try to force the differences between all four of the S-parameters of the microstrip coupler to equal those of the ideal coupler. Go to the Optim/Stat/DOE palette to find the necessary items to place in the schematic. Also, go back to the quad_real_1_4port.dsn higher level schematic and make the appropriate variables optimizable.

9 GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL Goal OptimGoal1 Expr="mag(S(1,1)-S(5,5))" SimInstanceName="SP1" Weight=1.0 Goal OptimGoal2 Expr="mag(S(2,1)-S(6,5))" SimInstanceName="SP1" Weight=1.0 Goal OptimGoal3 Expr="mag(S(3,1)-S(7,5))" SimInstanceName="SP1" Weight=1.0 Figure 7: Goal optimization blocks Goal OptimGoal4 Expr="mag(S(4,1)-S(8,5))" SimInstanceName="SP1" Weight=1.0 8. Input an optimization block to attempt to optimize the microstrip coupler so the following performance specifications are met: 1) Return Loss = at least 25 db at the center frequency 2) The amplitude match between S21 and S31 should be excellent and each should be as close to -3 db as possible (e.g. -3 +/- 0.5 db). 3) The phase difference between S21 and S31 should be in the range of 90 +/- 5 degrees or better. 4. Isolation = at least 25 db near the center frequency. In this exercise, we use the difference between the S-parameters of the ideal coupler and those of the microstrip coupler as our function to be minimized. We will attempt to make all four difference magnitudes below 0.05. 9. Keep in mind that you should Update Optimization Values after each optimization run. If necessary, you can reduce the bandwidth over which the optimization is performed by changing the band over which the simulation is performed. If, after optimizing, you have difficulty in obtaining a more desirable response from the real network, check the limits on your optimization variables. It is possible that one of the variables to be optimized has encountered a limit. 10. After successfully modifying the microstrip coupler, obtain a plot of the final schematic, the S- parameters of the optimized coupler, and the final plot showing the four S-parameter magnitude differences over frequency (up to 8 GHz). 11. Go into your quad_real_1_4port schematic and disable the optimization on the variables. This will fix the final values in case you use the schematic in a later design. Laboratory Report Your laboratory report should contain the following: 1) Printout of the graphics display window showing the S-parameters of the ideal transmission line coupler with the information about the 90-degree phase difference frequency range for S21 and S31. Include identifying information on the printout. 2) Printout of the microstrip quadrature coupler schematic prior to performing any design modifications. Include identifying information on the printout. 3) Printout of the S-parameters of the microstrip quadrature coupler, prior to performing any design modifications, along with the 4 S-parameter magnitude differences. Include identifying information on the printout.

10 4) Values for S55, S65, S75, and S85 at 2.5 GHz of the microstrip couler, prior to performing any design modifications, along with the value of the 4 S-parameter magnitude differences at 2.5 GHz. 5) Printout of the microstrip quadrature coupler schematic after optimization. Include identifying information on the printout. 6) Printout of S-parameters of the microstrip quadrature coupler, after optimization, along with the 4 S-parameter magnitude differences. Include identifying information on the printout. Discussion of Results: 1) What process worked best for optimizing the response of the microstrip coupler (i.e. what type of optimization did you use, approximately how long/how many simulations did it require to get good values for the microstrip coupler. 2) Before the optimization of the microstrip coupler was performed, what trends (if any) did you notice in the 4 S-parameter magnitude differences? If so, what might be the cause of these trends?