Recently, the SS38 Working Group on Inter-Area Dynamic Analysis completed two study reports on behalf of the UFLS Regional Standard Drafting Team.

Similar documents
NPCC Regional Reliability Reference Directory # 12. Underfrequency Load Shedding Program Requirements

BED INTERCONNECTION TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

ReliabilityFirst Regional Criteria 1. Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting Criteria

Document C-29. Procedures for System Modeling: Data Requirements & Facility Ratings. January 5 th, 2016 TFSS Revisions Clean Open Process Posting

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction. See the Implementation Plan for PRC

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction

Keeping it up to Speed Off-Nominal Frequency Operations. CETAC 2018 San Ramon

PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting Requirements

Definition of Bulk Electric System Phase 2

September 19, Errata to Implementation Plan for the Revised Definition of Remedial Action Scheme

Standard VAR-002-2b(X) Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. A. Introduction 1. Title: Generator Relay Loadability 2. Number: PRC-025-1

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. Guidelines and Technical Basis Draft 5: (August 2, 2013) Page 1 of 76

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation. Transmission Planning Guidelines

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. Guidelines and Technical Basis Draft 4: (June 10, 2013) Page 1 of 75

NORMES DE FIABILITÉ DE LA NERC (VERSION ANGLAISE)

PRC Generator Relay Loadability. A. Introduction 1. Title: Generator Relay Loadability 2. Number: PRC-025-1

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

Standard VAR-002-2b(X) Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules. 45-day Formal Comment Period with Initial Ballot June July 2014

Implementation of Revised IEEE Standard 1547

Transmission Interconnection Requirements for Inverter-Based Generation

Standard VAR-002-2b(X) Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

Standard VAR Voltage and Reactive Control

Reliability Guideline: Generating Unit Operations During Complete Loss of Communications

Reliability Guideline: Generating Unit Operations During Complete Loss of Communications

1

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section Wind Aggregated Generating Facilities Technical Requirements

Generation and Load Interconnection Standard

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

Standard Development Timeline

INTERIM ARRANGEMENTS FOR GRID TIED DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES. Technical Requirements for Grid-Tied DERs

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section Aggregated Generating Facilities Technical Requirements

Implementation Plan Project Modifications to PRC Reliability Standard PRC-025-2

Bulk Electric System Definition Reference Document

Texas Reliability Entity Event Analysis. Event: May 8, 2011 Loss of Multiple Elements Category 1a Event

generation greater than 75 MVA (gross aggregate nameplate rating) Generation in the ERCOT Interconnection with the following characteristics:

May 30, Errata to Implementation Plan for the Revised Definition of Remedial Action Scheme Docket No. RM15-13-_

Unit Auxiliary Transformer Overcurrent Relay Loadability During a Transmission Depressed Voltage Condition

Generation and Load Interconnection Standard

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

GridLiance Reliability Criteria

Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. Glossary of Terms. Approved by the Reliability Standards Committee

Bulk Electric System Definition Reference Document

Implementation Plan Project Alignment of Terms

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

Southern Company Interconnection Requirements for Inverter-Based Generation

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

System Operating Limit Definition and Exceedance Clarification

Standard Development Timeline

HOOSIER ENERGY REC, INC. Requirements for Connection of Generation Facilities. to the HE Transmission System

(Circuits Subject to Requirements R1 R5) Generator Owner with load-responsive phase protection systems as described in

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

Bulk Electric System Definition Reference Document

Standard PRC Coordination of Generating Unit or Plant Capabilities, Voltage Regulating Controls, and Protection

Standard VAR b Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

Implementation Plan Project Balancing Authority Reliability-based Controls - Reserves

Alberta Reliability Standard Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting BAL-003-AB-1.1

The Connecticut Light and Power Company

NERC Protection Coordination Webinar Series June 16, Phil Tatro Jon Gardell

A. Introduction. VAR Voltage and Reactive Control

Wind Power Facility Technical Requirements CHANGE HISTORY

VAR Voltage and Reactive Control. A. Introduction

VAR Voltage and Reactive Control

Procedure for ERO Support of Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Standard. Event Selection Process

Loss of Solar Resources during Transmission Disturbances due to Inverter Settings II

ATTACHMENT - AESO FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION

Table of Contents. Introduction... 1

Standard BAL Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING GUIDELINES. Transmission Planning

A New Approach Applied to Adaptive Centralized Load Shedding Scheme

August 25, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Unit Auxiliary Transformer (UAT) Relay Loadability Report

NERC Protection Coordination Webinar Series June 23, Phil Tatro

System Protection and Control Subcommittee

Standard PRC Coordination of Generating Unit or Plant Capabilities, Voltage Regulating Controls, and Protection

August 25, Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions concerning this filing.

FACILITY RATINGS METHOD TABLE OF CONTENTS

E N G I N E E R I N G M A N U A L

Industry Webinar Draft Standard

BEFORE THE ALBERTA ELECTRIC SYSTEM OPERATOR

Standard Development Timeline

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section SCADA Technical and Operating Requirements

Technical Requirements For Generation Connected to The ODEC System

Considerations for Power Plant and Transmission System Protection Coordination

Consideration of Comments on FRCC Regional Bulk Electric System Definition Clarification Project Version 1

LONG-RANGE TRANSMISSION PLAN

Standard BAL b Automatic Generation Control

DP&L s Technical Requirements for Interconnection and Parallel Operation of Distributed Generation

Appeals Policy Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation th Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C

Standard MOD Verification of Models and Data for Generator Excitation Control Sys tem or Plant Volt/Var Control Functions

Remedial Action Scheme Definition Development

Power Plant and Transmission System Protection Coordination

Voltage and Reactive Procedures CMP-VAR-01

Standard MOD Verification of Models and Data for Generator Excitation Control System or Plant Volt/Var Control Functions

Standard PRC Coordination of Generating Unit or Plant Voltage Regulating Controls with Generating Unit or Plant Capabilities and Protection

Functional Specification Revision History

Setting and Verification of Generation Protection to Meet NERC Reliability Standards

IEEE sion/1547revision_index.html

Transcription:

December 7 th, 2010 NPCC Full Member Committee; Please find attached a draft revised NPCC Regional Reliability Directory #12 Underfrequency Load Shedding Program Requirements and a draft revised NPCC UFLS Implementation Plan which are now posted to receive your comments through the NPCC Process for Open Review. Recently, the SS38 Working Group on Inter-Area Dynamic Analysis completed two study reports on behalf of the UFLS Regional Standard Drafting Team. The results and recommendations of those reports and their impact on the NPCC Regional UFLS program have been approved and endorsed by the Task Force on System Studies (TFSS) and the Reliability Coordinating Committee (RCC). Accordingly, those study results have now been incorporated within the attached revised draft of Directory #12 and redlined to highlight the SS-38 recommendations on program tolerances and generator applicability. On a separate but related issue, the TFSS has also endorsed revisions to the existing RCC approved NPCC UFLS Implementation Plan which will provide additional direction to entities who are currently implementing the NPCC UFLS program changes but require more detailed implementation guidance.

The NPCC Open Process Review may be accessed through the following link: https://www.npcc.org/regstandards/opother.aspx Each document may be viewed and downloaded under the document link and comments can be posted clicking on the add link and following the prompts provided. Comments on the proposed revisions to Directory#12 and the UFLS Implementation Plan will be received for forty five days through Jan. 21, 2011 and all comments will be addressed by the TFSS. Please contact me with any questions regarding Directory content or document review. Thank you. Gerry Dunbar Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. 212.840.1070 (p) 212.302.2782 (f) gdunbar@npcc.org

Revised to include SS38 Study Report Program Recommendations Open Process Posting December 7, 2010. NPCC Regional Reliability Reference Directory # 12 Under frequency Load Shedding Program Requirements Task Force on Coordination of Operations Revision Review Record: June 26 th, 2009 March 3 rd, 2010 Adopted by the Members of the Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. June 26 th, 2009 based on recommendation by the Reliability Coordinating Committee, in accordance with Section VIII of the NPCC Amended and Restated Bylaws dated July 24, 2007 as amended to date.

Revision History Version Date Action Change Tracking (New, Errata or Revisions) 0 6/26/09 Effective Date New 1 3/03/10 Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 revised to consider small entity participation. Revision 2

Table of Content Title Page 1 Revision History 2 Table of Content 3 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Terms Defined in This Directory 4 3.0 NERC ERO Reliability Standard Requirements 5 4.0 NPCC Regional Reliability Requirements 5 5.0 NPCC Full Member More Stringent Requirements 5 5.1 Underfrequency Load Shedding Program - General Criteria 5 5.2 Under frequency Load Shedding Program Eastern 5 Interconnection Specific Requirements 5.3 Under frequency Load Shedding Program Québec 6 Interconnection Specific Requirements 5.4 Generator Underfrequency Protection Requirements 7 5.5 UFLS Assessment Requirements 8 6.0 Measures and Assessments 8 7.0 Compliance Monitoring 8 Appendix A 3

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Title Under frequency Load Shedding Program 1.2 Directory Number 12 1.3 Objective This Directory presents the basic criteria for the design and implementation of under frequency load shedding programs to ensure that declining frequency is arrested and recovered in accordance with established NPCC performance requirements to prevent system collapse due to loadgeneration imbalance. 1.4 Effective Date June 26 th, 2009 The effective date of this Directory also is the initial date of a six-year implementation plan for under frequency load shedding program in the portion of NPCC in the Eastern Interconnection and a two-year implementation plan in the Québec Interconnection. 1.5 Background This Directory was developed from the automatic Under frequency Load Shedding requirements in NPCC Directory #2, Emergency Operations, and the recommendations and implementation plans provided in the study reports: 2006 Assessment of Under frequency Load Shedding Adequacy Part III Assessment of Program Modifications and 2008 Assessment of Under frequency Load Shedding Adequacy Québec Area, approved by the Reliability Coordinating Committee on November 19, 2008. 1.6 Applicability 1.6.1 Functional Entities Balancing Authorities Transmission Operators Generator Owners with individual generating units or a generating plant/facility 1 MVA (nameplate rating) connected at all voltage levels. 2.0 Terms Defined in this Directory The definitions of terms found in this Directory appearing in bold typeface can be found in the Appendix A. 4

3.0 NERC ERO Reliability Standard Requirements The NERC ERO Reliability Standards containing Requirements that are associated with this Directory include, but may not be limited to: 3.1 3.2 3.3 EOP-003: Load Shedding Plans PRC-006: Development and Documentation of Regional UFLS Programs PRC-007: Assuring Consistency with Regional UFLS Program Requirements 4.0 NPCC Regional Reliability Standard Requirements None. 5.0 NPCC Full Member, More Stringent Criteria These Criteria are in addition to, or more stringent or more specific than the NERC or any Regional Reliability standard requirements. 5.1 Under frequency Load Shedding Program General Criteria The intent of the NPCC automatic Under frequency Load Shedding program is to ensure that declining frequency is arrested and recovered in accordance with established NPCC performance requirements stipulated in this document, as follows: 5.1.1 Frequency decline is arrested at no less than 58.0 Hz for the portions of NPCC in the Eastern Interconnection and 56.0 Hz for the portion of NPCC in the Québec Interconnection. 5.1.2 Frequency does not remain below 58.5 Hz for greater than 10 seconds, and does not remain below 59.5 Hz for greater than 30 seconds, for a generation deficiency of up to 25% of the load. 5.2 Under frequency Load Shedding Program Eastern Interconnection specific Requirements Each Balancing Authority in the NPCC portion of the Eastern Interconnection shall develop an automatic Under frequency Load Shedding Program that meets the following requirements, unless an alternative plan is submitted by the Balancing Authority for review by the NPCC Task Forces on Coordination of Operation and System Studies and approved by the NPCC Reliability Coordinating Committee: 5

5.2.1 The program shall consist of five stages of load shedding to be provided by entities with 100 MW or more of end-use load connected to its facilities with the following attributes: Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 (antistall) Threshold Setting 59.5 Hz 59.3 Hz 59.1 Hz 58.9 Hz Block Size 6.5-7.5 percent 7 percent 6.5-7.5 percent7 percent 6.5-7.5 percent7 percent 6.5-7.5 percent 7 percent Total Operating Time (1) 300 ms 300 ms 300 ms 300 ms 59.5 Hz 2 3 percent 10 s Cumulative Load Shed as % of TO or DP Load 6.5-7.5 13.5-14.5 20.5-21.5 27.5-28.5 29.5-31.5 Notes: (1) Total operating time is the load-weighted average for all load within a Balancing Authority area, with maximum deviation for any load limited to ±50 ms. 5.2.2 The program shall consist of two stages of load shedding to be provided by entities with 50 MW or more and less than 100 MW of end-use load connected to its facilities with the following attributes: Threshold Setting Block Size Total Operating Time (1) Cumulative Load Shed as % of TO or DP Load Stage 1 59.5 Hz 14-25 percent 300 ms 14-25 Stage 2 59.1 Hz 14 25 percent 300 ms 25-50 Notes: (1) Total operating time is the load-weighted average for all load within a Balancing Authority area, with maximum deviation for any load limited to ±50 ms. 5.2.3 The program shall consist of one stage of load shedding to be provided by entities with 25 MW or more and less than 6

50 MW of end-use load connected to its facilities with the following attributes: Threshold Setting Block Size Total Operating Time (1) Cumulative Load Shed as % of TO or DP Load Stage 1 59.5 Hz 28-50 percent 300 ms 28-50 Notes: (1) Total operating time is the load-weighted average for all load within a Balancing Authority area, with maximum deviation for any load limited to ±50 ms. 5.2.4 Entities with less than 25 MW of end-use load connected to its facilities are exempt from providing UFLS. 5.2.5 Entities with less than 100 MW of end-use load connected to its facilities may collectively implement by mutual agreement with one or more entities within the same island 1 identified an aggregated automatic UFLS program that sheds load based on the frequency thresholds in section 5.2.1 as an alternative to implementing the applicable program in section 5.2.2 or 5.2.3. 5.2.6 Under frequency threshold relays shall be set to a nominal total operating time of 300 ms, from the time when frequency passes through the set point to the time of circuit breaker contact opening (including any communications time delay), with a minimum relay operating time to be no less than 100 ms when the rate of frequency decay is 0.2 Hz per second. 5.3 Under frequency Load Shedding Program Québec Interconnection Specific Requirements The Balancing Authority in the Québec Interconnection shall develop an automatic Under frequency Load Shedding Program that meets the following requirements, unless an alternative plan is submitted by the Balancing Authority for review by the NPCC Task Forces on Coordination of Operation and System Studies and approved by the NPCC Reliability Coordinating Committee: 1 BA shall identify the appropriate island for entities participating in the program. 7

5.3.1 The program shall consist of five threshold stages and four rate-ofchange (slope) stages of load shedding as depicted in Table 2. Table 2 UFLS Parameters for the Québec Interconnection Portion of NPCC Rate Frequency MW at System Peak Mvar at System Peak Total Operating Time Threshold Stage 1 58.5 Hz 1000 MW (1) 1000 Mvar 300 ms Threshold Stage 2 58.0 Hz 800 MW (1) 800 Mvar 300 ms Threshold Stage 3 57.5 Hz 800 MW 800 Mvar 300 ms Threshold Stage 4 57.0 Hz 800 MW 800 Mvar 300 ms Threshold Stage 5 (anti-stall) 59.0 Hz 500 MW 500 Mvar 20 s Slope Stage 1-0.3 Hz/s 58.5 Hz 400 MW 400 Mvar 300 ms Slope Stage 2-0.4 Hz/s 59.8 Hz 800 MW (1) 800 Mvar 300 ms Slope Stage 3-0.6 Hz/s 59.8 Hz 800 MW (1) 800 Mvar 300 ms Slope Stage 4-0.9 Hz/s 59.8 Hz 800 MW 800 Mvar 300 ms Notes: (1) These stages shed fixed load independent of system load level. (2) The amount of load shedding in this table includes load shedding to compensate for generators that trip above the curve in Figure 1. 5.4 Generator Under frequency Protection Requirements Generators shall not be tripped for under-frequency conditions in the area above the curve in Figure 1, except as provided for in Sections 5.4.1 and 5.4.2. 5.4.1 It is recognized that, in special cases, requirements may dictate generator trip in the region above the curve. In those cases, the Generator Owner shall so notify its Balancing Authority and shall ensure through alternate arrangements, that automatic load shedding additional to the amount set out in Section 5.2 and in Section 5.3, equivalent (+/- 5%) to the amount of generation to be 8

tripped, is provided. Such cases shall be reviewed by the Task Force on Coordination of Operation 5.4.2 Generator Owners shall not increase the under frequency trip settings or make other modifications to the existing exempt generators (that trip above the curve in Figure 1) that may cause these generators to, directly or indirectly, trip at a higher frequency. 5.5 UFLS Program Assessment Requirements 5.5.1 Studies shall be performed by the associated Transmission Operator to ensure satisfactory voltage and loading conditions after automatic load shedding. 5.5.2 The Task Force on System Studies shall conduct a triennial study to coordinate the Automatic Under frequency Load Shedding Program among the NPCC Balancing Authorities. 6.0 Measures and Assessments None developed at this time. 7.0 Compliance Monitoring Adherence to these Criteria shall be reported by the responsible entity in a manner and form designated by the Compliance Committee. Prepared by: Task Force on System Studies Review and Approval: Revision to any portion of this Directory will be posted by the lead Task Force in the NPCC Open Process for a 45 day review and comment period. Upon satisfactorily addressing all the comments in this forum, the Directory document will be sent to the remaining Task Forces for their recommendation to seek RCC approval. Upon approval of the RCC, this Directory will be sent to the Full Member Representatives for their final approval if sections pertaining to the Requirements and Criteria portion have been revised. All voting and approvals will be conducted according to the most current "NPCC Bylaws" in effect at the time the ballots are cast. Revisions pertaining to the Appendices or any other portion of 9

the document such as Links, glossary of terms, etc., will only require RCC Members approval. Errata may be corrected by the Lead Task Force at any time and provide the appropriate notifications to the NPCC Inc. membership. This Directory will be updated at least once every three years and as often as necessary to keep it current and consistent with NERC, Regional Reliability Standards and other NPCC documents. References: NPCC Directory #2 Emergency Operations. 10

Generator tripping permitted on or below curve without requiring additional equivalent automatic load shedding. 3.3 1

Appendix A Definition of Terms 2 Bulk power system The interconnected electrical systems within northeastern North America comprised of system elements on which faults or disturbances can have a significant adverse impact outside of the local area. Island A portion of a power system or several power systems that is electrically separated from the interconnection due to the disconnection of transmission system elements. Load The electric power used by devices connected to an electrical generating system. (IEEE Power Engineering). Also see Demand. NPCC Specific Definitions: Firm Load Loads that are not Interruptible Loads. Interruptible Load Loads that are interruptible under the terms specified in a contract. Load Shedding The process of deliberately removing (either manually or automatically) preselected customers' load from a power system in response to an abnormal condition to maintain the integrity of the system and minimize overall customer outages. Relay An electrical device designed to respond to input conditions in a prescribed manner and after specified conditions are met to cause contact operation or similar abrupt change in associated electric control circuits. (Also: see protective relay). 2 These terms will be moved and grouped under a separate Directory when all other Directories are developed. 1