INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Similar documents
Chapter 3 WORLDWIDE PATENTING ACTIVITY

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION. WIPO PATENT REPORT Statistics on Worldwide Patent Activities

USE OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

WORLDWIDE PATENTING ACTIVITY

Key Features of Patent and Utility Models Protection

Weekly Report. Technological and Regional Patterns in R&D Internationalization by German Companies

Global Trends in Patenting

2.3 Trends Related to Research Performance

Revisiting the USPTO Concordance Between the U.S. Patent Classification and the Standard Industrial Classification Systems

Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia

Department of Intellectual Property

Asking Questions on Knowledge Exchange and Exploitation in the Business R&D and Innovation Survey

Joint Research Centre

Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator Lecture 3.1

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

PCT Yearly Review 2017 Executive Summary. The International Patent System

WIPO Economics & Statistics Series. Economic Research Working Paper No. 12. Exploring the worldwide patent surge. Carsten Fink Mosahid Khan Hao Zhou

Innovation trends in China

Intellectual Property Rights at the JPO: Statistics (2017)

Highlights. Patent applications worldwide grew by 5.8% 1.1. Patent applications worldwide,

Intellectual Property /IP/ Research in Business Education

specialization pattern of countries

PCT Yearly Review 2018 Executive Summary. The International Patent System

INNOVATION, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND PATENTS AT UNIVERSITIES

WIN In-House Counsel Day Melbourne

Mathys & Squire. Agri-Tech Intellectual Property Rights in Europe. mathys-squire.com

Impact of international cooperation and science and innovation strategies on S&T output: a comparative study of India and China

Engr. VIRGINIA F. AUMENTADO Patent Information Analytics and Technology Monitoring Division (PATMD)

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010 Highlights

Trends in the Number of Scientific. in Selected Countries Scientific Papers

Mapping Iranian patents based on International Patent Classification (IPC), from 1976 to 2011

Patents. Highlights. Figure 1 Patent applications worldwide

tepav April2015 N EVALUATION NOTE Science, Technology and Innovation in G20 Countries Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey

Figure 1-1 The Female Presence in R&D. Response to consumption by women Boosting of innovation through greater diversity To achieve this

Patenting trends among the SAARC nations: comparing the local and international patenting intensity

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

Mapping Iranian patents based on International Patent Classification (IPC), from 1976 to 2011

CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACEUTICALS PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

Decoding jute plant genome an eye opener. Abdul Quader

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

Identifying Key Technologies in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from Patent Information

Intellectual Property Importance

The Internationalization of R&D in India: Opportunities and Challenges. Rajeev Anantaram National Interest Project March 2009

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) SME SCOREBOARD 2016

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) SME SCOREBOARD 2016

IBM Melbourne Institute Innovation Index of Australian Industry

Changing role of the State in Innovative Activity The Indian Experience. Sunil Mani

PATENT ATTORNEYS TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS

Globalizing IPR Protection: How Important Might RTAs Be?

The Impact of the Breadth of Patent Protection and the Japanese University Patents

Electronics and Computer Patents in Vietnam

Fast-tracking green patent applications: An empirical analysis. Antoine Dechezleprêtre

AusBiotech response to Paper 1: Amending inventive step requirements for Australian patents (August 2017)

SciVal February 2016 release

China: Managing the IP Lifecycle 2018/2019

Indicators, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, MEXT

Chapter 5. Patenting activity in Brazil and abroad

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library. Presentation Adapted from Dr. V K Gupta, CSIR

COUNTRY SPECIALISATION REPORT

Standards as a Knowledge Source for R&D:

Executive Summary World Robotics 2018 Industrial Robots

NATIONAL SURVEY of Research and Development in Singapore

Topic 3: Patent Family Concepts and Sources for Family Information

Intellectual Property

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION - DECISIVE FACTORS OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

RTA of EU regions and top R&D investors

Canada's Cost Competitiveness: An Exchange Rate and Productivity Story

Overview on Patent Reforms in South Africa. Mr Trod Lehong 14 September 2017 Adams & Adams

Patenting trends in Indian pharmaceutical industry

European Design Filings At O H I M. René Havermans 22 February 2013 OECD Expert Workshop on Measuring Design

For personal use only

Where do patent measures fall short in the life sciences? Bhaven N. Sampat Columbia University and NBER July 28, 2017

THE LEGAL MARKETPLACE IN AN EVOLVING PATENT LANDSCAPE

COUNTRY SPECIALISATION REPORT

Insights: Litigation Trends (Top 10 Global Suppliers)

JPO s Status report. February 2016 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management In The Energy-Smart World (PICMET)

Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change

International Protection of ICT Intellectual Property and the Internationalization of ICT R&D

Academy of Scientific Research &Technology Egyptian Patent Office

Executive summary. AI is the new electricity. I can hardly imagine an industry which is not going to be transformed by AI.

IP KEY SOUTH EAST ASIA ANNUAL WORK PLAN FOR 2018

IPR in the EU 2011, 2012, 2013, By Jesper Kongstad Director General, CEO The Danish Patent and Trademark Office

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Twelve ways to manage global patent costs

THE SUBJECT COMPOSITION OF THE WORLD'S SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS

Catalogue no X. Industrial Research and Development: Intentions

China s High-tech Exports: Myth and Reality

The structural transformations of internationalized R&D activities: An analysis of patents data

Sri Lanka Science, Technology & Innovation Statistical Handbook 2015

THE EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPATIAL ARCHITECTURE OF CLUSTERING AND VALUE NETWORKS

Standards as a knowledge source for R&D: A first look at their characteristics based on inventor survey and patent bibliographic data

IP Data Collection and Dissemination at WIPO

AAAS Project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest

Corporate Invention Board

Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries

CPC Essentials I Part A Introduction to CPC Essentials and Patent Classification Systems

New Intellectual Property Policy for Pro-Innovation

Intellectual Property Overview

Transcription:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SCORECARD -6 FAST FACTS n Since there has been an almost continual increase in the percentage of patents applications in Australia, with a 6.9% increase between 5 and 6. n Trade marks continue to be the most common form of IP protection. Three of the top five trade marks classes relate to services rather than goods. Since their inception in 1979, service marks have in general enjoyed higher annual growth rates compared with growth in goods marks. n In 6, Australia ranked 1th for patents granted to foreign-based applicants by the USPTO. The percentage of patent grants to Australians by the USPTO has been rising over the past five years. n As in Australia, Australians acquired US patents mostly in areas such as Handling and Printing; Information Technology; Medical Engineering; and Consumer Goods and Equipment. n There has been a trend increase in the number of patents granted to Australians by the EPO, but at a much lower level than grants by the USPTO. n Areas in which Australia has a Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) for patents granted by IP Australia include Civil Engineering, Building and Mining; Handling and Printing; Transport; Mechanical Tools; and Space Technology and Weapons. Australia has recorded an RTA for patents granted by the USPTO and the EPO in areas such as Agriculture and Food Machinery; Civil Engineering, Building and Mining; Space Technology and Weapons; and Biotechnology. Domestic IP Protection Activity Intellectual Property Protection Applications (App.) and Grants in Australia, All Sources 3 5 6 Patent App. 565 161 87 39 555 Patent Grant 137 1311 1739 1979 96 Innovation Patent App. 135 18 111 173 19 Innovation Patent Grant 758 16 177 961 111 Trade Marks App. (no. of classes) Trade Marks Grant (no. of classes) 6186 7396 859 983 11919 51699 5 53565 6193 6991 Designs App. 111 693 57 586 5881 Designs Grant 38 399 333 583 737 Plant Breeders Rights App. 377 378 337 35 36 Plant Breeders Rights Grant 86 181 3 36 8 n While patent applications grew by 5.9% between and 5, they grew by 6.9% between 5 and 6. n Patents granted showed a modest decline between and followed by a steeper decline between and 6. n To address the decline in patents granted, IP Australia has increased the number of patent examiners by 7% since -5. Current indications are that the backlog of applications is reducing.

n While Advertising and Business Management is currently the largest category of applications, in percentage terms, the largest increase between 5 and 6 (.%) was in Scientific Research trade marks. n The growth of service marks is likely to be associated with the introduction of new services and a growing commercial awareness among organisations. n Innovation patent applications have levelled off at around 11 per year and the number of innovation patents granted is around 1 per year. n Trade marks continue to be the most popular form of intellectual property protection. Between and 5 trade marks applications grew by.6% and by 9.8% between 5 and 6. Over the same periods, the number of trade marks granted grew by.3% and 1.% respectively. Trade marks are known to be associated with the launch of new innovative products and services. n From 1997 to, design applications had been generally static at approximately per year. While an increase was experienced in 3, the sharp increase in may have been a consequence of the introduction, in June, of new designs legislation streamlining the registration and examination processes. Clearing a backlog of previous years applications resulted in high numbers of design grants in 5 and 6. n The plant breeders rights applications have not changed much over the period to 6. Grants remained about the same in 6 as in, and were below applications. Top 5 Trade Marks Applications in Australia, by Class (C)* Class 3 5 6 Advert. and Business 5195 68 777 8353 967 Mgt. (C35) Instruments (C9) 63 676 75 7689 875 Education/Entertain. 67 511 65 756 7787 (C1) Clothing/Footwear 1 5168 616 638 666 (C5) Scientific Research (C) 3 3513 396 97 536 *Note: Goods and services are divided into different classes according to Nice International Classification System. n Three of the top five trade marks classes relate to services rather than goods. Since their inception in 1979, service marks have in general enjoyed higher annual growth rates compared with growth in goods marks. Patents Applications by and Grants to Australians, Top 5 Technology Groups* Technology Group 3 5 6 Handling, Printing Civil Eng., Building, Mining Information Technology Consumer Goods, Equipment Medical Engineering 36 67 58 168 339 6 5 17 193 6 77 78 56 15 399 11 71 97 1 61 361 158 58 155 398 77 8 15 165 57 38 198 586 16 16 1 538 95 5 63 89 135 63 13 37 91 58 7 51 7 *Note: The number of patents granted in a particular year bears little relationship to the number of patent applications in that year (it is likely to be several years before they proceed to the grant stage). n Three of the top five patenting technologies belong to well established or mature sectors: Civil Engineering, Building and Mining; Handling and Printing; and Consumer Goods and Equipment. n Grants for Handing and Printing; and Information Technology areas have shown signs of a general rising trend since. n Grants in Civil Engineering, Building and Mining; and Consumer Goods and Equipment have shown signs of a general decrease since, while applications numbers have increased. Patents Granted to Australians, Top 5 Technology Groups for Increased Activity Technology Group 3 5 6 Handling, Printing 67 78 158 198 135 Information 6 11 77 1 91 Technology Pharmaceuticals, 8 37 8 3 5 Cosmetics Telecommunications 17 38 33 38 1 Audiovisual 13 7 1 16 1

n From to 6 innovation patents granted in the Civil Engineering, Building and Mining technology group grew by 7%, the highest growth rate of all the technology classes for innovation patents. Between 5 and 6 the highest growth rate was in Transport (3%). Total Patents Granted in Australia to Australians 1 1 Number of patents to Australians (LHS) % of total patents (RHS) 1 1 n While Handling and Printing accounted for the largest absolute growth (number of patents granted) from to 6, the Information Technology group recorded the highest percentage growth (5%) over that period. n The strong growth in Handling and Printing patents is primarily due to the efforts of a single specialised company. n As is the case elsewhere in the world, Telecommunications patents granted to Australians have also recorded growth. n The Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics grants to Australians in Australia have increased since, with an impressive growth rate of 8% between 5 and 6. Innovation Patents Granted to Australians, Top 5 Technology Groups* Technology Group 3 5 6 Consumer Goods, 1 189 19 177 158 Equipment Civil Eng., Building, 77 138 153 17 131 Mining Information 6 76 8 68 81 Technology Transport 6 7 7 66 87 Handling, Printing 37 59 69 53 53 * Innovation patents introduced in May 1 n Innovation patents indicate innovative activities in areas with a shorter commercial life, or lower inventive step, and so are good indicators for innovative activity by small companies and individuals. n The main technology areas serviced by innovation patents are almost identical to those served by standard patents for Australian companies and individuals. The exception is the relatively high number of Transport innovation patents. 1 8 6 3 5 6 n While the total number of Australians granted a patent in Australia has declined since, as a proportion of the total patents granted, the percentage of patents granted to Australians has increased over the same period to approximately 11 per cent. Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) 1 for Australians Patenting in Australia.5 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 Civil Eng., Building, Mining Handling, Printing Space Technology & Weapons Transport Agriculture & Food Machinery Mechanical Tools 3 5 6 n The chart shows trends in the Revealed Technological Advantage (vertical axis) for the top six Australian technological areas. It reveals that while Civil Engineering, Building and Mining has generally been Australia s leading area of advantage, Handling and Printing has increased in importance since. n While Space Technology and Weapons is among the top six Australian technological areas in terms of RTA, the absolute number of grants of this technology group is relatively low. 1 Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) indices indicate the strength of Australians in a given technology relative to the rest of the world. An index number of greater than 1 means that Australians patent more intensively in a given technology area than the rest of the world. The higher the index, the higher is the patenting intensity. 8 6

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patents Granted to Australians by the USPTO 18 16 1 1 1 8 6 No. of patents to AUS (LHS) % of total patents (RHS) 3 5 6.9.8.7.6.5..3..1. International IP Protection Activity Estimated OECD Triadic Patent Applications by Australians* 5 3 1 No. of patent applications by Australians (LHS) % of total applications (RHS) 3 5 *6 data not yet available n Less than 5% of all patent applications in the world are simultaneously filed at the three main patent offices, that is, the US, European and Japanese patent offices. The triadic applications generally represent the most commercially valuable inventions. n Currently, there are no official records of the number of Australians who submit a triadic application, but estimates from the OECD indicate that approximately triadic patent applications were lodged by Australians in 5. n Over the period from to 5 estimated applications by Australians remained fairly constant between.8 to.85% of total OECD applications..9.8.7.6.5..3..1. n In 6, Australians ranked 1th for patents granted to non-us nationals by the USPTO, up from 1th in. n In contrast to trends at the Australian Patent Office, the number of patents granted to Australians at the USPTO rose significantly in 6 compared with the previous years. n Currently, Australians account for approximately.8% of all patent grants issued by the USPTO. There was a significant increase in the number of grants in 6 compared with the previous years. The percentage of grants to Australians by the USPTO has been consistently increasing since. n It is not clear whether the increase in grants between 5 6 is because of a rise in applications to the USPTO or because of a higher success rate, since the USPTO does not publish details on grant rates. n There has been a trend increase in the number of Australians applying to the USPTO for patents over the last half century. USPTO Patents Granted to Australians, Top 5 Technology Groups Technology Groups 3 5 6 Handling, Printing 16 11 18 17 31 Information Technology 33 59 69 1 Analysis, Measure, Control 35 63 56 9 7 Medical Engineering 51 61 5 53 7 Consumer Goods, Equipment 73 67 6 58 61 n The main technology areas in which Australians are acquiring patents in the United States are broadly the same as those in which they are acquiring patents in Australia, that is: Handling and Printing; Consumer Goods and Equipment; Information Technology; and Medical Engineering.

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO) Patents Granted to Australians by the EPO 35 3 5 15 1 No. of patents to AUS (LHS) % of total patents (RHS).6.5..3. n As in the Australian situation, Handling and Printing grants to Australians by the USPTO is dominated by a single Australian company. n The next main technology area is Information Technology. This area has seen the highest percentage rate of growth in the number of all patents granted since (overall 61%, 16% since 5). Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) for Australians Patenting in the USA 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 Handling, Printing Agriculture & Food Machinery Civil Eng., Building, Mining Materials, Metallurgy Space Technology & Weapons Biotechnology 3 5 6 n The RTA index for Handing and Printing is significantly higher than that for all other technology groups. n As with the Revealed Technological Advantage index data from the Australian Patent Office, the USPTO data show that Australians have a RTA in technology areas such as Handling and Printing; Agriculture and Food Machinery; Civil Engineering, Building and Mining; and Space Technology and Weapons. n Unlike the Australian data, the USPTO data suggest Australians have RTA in Biotechnology, and in Materials and Metallurgy for patents in the USA. 5 3 5 6 n Australians ranked 17th for patents granted by the EPO in 6 and 5th of countries outside the European Union, the same position as in. n As with the USPTO data, there has been a trend increase in patents granted to Australians by the EPO. Patents granted to Australians by the EPO grew by 77.5% between and 6. n While this may be indicative of a growth in interest in European markets by Australians, some of the absolute growth in this activity will be a substitute for directly filing at the EPO rather than at the national European offices. EPO Patents granted to Australians, Top 5 Technology Groups Technology Groups 3 5 6 Handling, Printing 1 13 18 5 3 Biotechnology 1 7 15 1 7 Medical Engineering 17 18 5 36 3 Civil Eng., Building, 15 17 1 1 1 Mining Analysis, Measure, Control 13 13 11 1 1 n Three of the top five technology groups for patents granted to the Australians by the EPO are also recorded in the USPTO patent grants. However, the absolute numbers of patents granted are considerably lower in Europe than the United States. n This fact may reflect the higher costs of patenting in Europe; the more restrictive examination standards in Europe; or a relatively greater commercial interest in the US market..1.

n As with the situation in the United States, Handling and Printing has experienced a relatively high rate of growth in patents granted to Australians by the EPO. Unlike the US situation, Biotechnology is one of the top five technology areas for patents granted to Australians in Europe. Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) for Australians in EPO 6 5 3 1 Biotechnology Space Technology & Weapons Civil Eng., Building, Mining Agriculture & Food Machinery Medical Engineering Materials, Metallurgy 3 5 6 n The smaller numbers of grants means that the patterns of RTA at the EPO may be significantly influenced by any variations in the reported data. Nevertheless, the list of the top six technologies in which Australians appear to have a RTA is broadly the same as for the USPTO, the exceptions being Handling and Printing, which does not appear in the EPO list, and Medical Engineering, which does. Forms of IP Protection A Patent is a right granted for any device, substance, method or process, which is new, useful, and must be inventive. Patents are classified into 3 broad Technology Groups (for more information see www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about/statistics.shtml). Innovation patents are a relatively fast, inexpensive option to protect inventions that are considered innovative, but not sufficiently inventive to meet standard patent requirement. Trade marks are marks (word, letter, logo) that are used to distinguish goods and services. Designs refer to a new, distinctive shape, configuration, or pattern which gives the product a unique appearance, and is related to an industrial or commercial use. Plant Breeder s Rights are used to protect new varieties of plants or its reproductive material. Triadic Patent Families are patent applications to the European Patent Office and the Japanese Patent Office, of patents granted by the US Patent and Trademark Office, and are counted from the earliest application date. Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) compares the fraction of Australian patents in a particular Technology Group as a percentage of total Australian patenting activity, with the fraction of all patenting activity in that Technology Group as a percentage of all patenting activity [AU patents in TG/all AU patents]/all patents in TG/all patents]. A value 1 indicates that Australians have a greater proportion of patenting activity (greater patenting intensity) in that Technology Group relative to total patenting activity. v Note: Due to variations in the counting and collating of patent statistics, the figures included should be considered as a guide only. Further information contact: Innovation Policy Branch Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. Ph: +61 613 7135 www.innovation.gov.au www.ipaustralia.gov.au Sources: Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia; IP Australia; US Patent and Trademark Office; and European Patent Office.