USOO A. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,272,450 Wisherd (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 21, 1993

Similar documents
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

United States Patent (19) Curcio

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1. Goeke (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 24, 2014

United States Patent (19) Theriault

United States Patent (19) Wrathal

United States Patent (19) Price, Jr.

(*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this E. E. E. " "...O.E.

16-?t R.S. S. Y \

United States Patent Patent Number: 5,683,539 Qian et al. 45 Date of Patent: Nov. 4, 1997

United States Patent (19) Evans

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,815,941 B2. Butler (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 9, 2004

United States Patent [19]

United States Patent (19) Harnden

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,104 B1

United States Patent (19) Ohta

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

United States Patent (19) Morris

HHHHHH. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,079,455. McCafferty et al. tor to provide a negative feedback path for charging the

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) United States Patent

4,695,748 Sep. 22, 1987

(12) United States Patent

II I III. United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation,

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) PeSola et al.

u-2 INVENTOR Dec. 3, P. J. KIBLER 2,412,090 Filed Feb. 14, 1944 PAUL. J. KBLER ATTORNEY TURNSTILE ANTENNA TO TRANSMTTER OR RECEIVER

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,920,230 Beall (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 6, 1999

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,534,804 Woo (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 1996

United States Patent (19)

us/ (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1 (19) United States / 112 / 108 Frederick et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,009,450 B2

United States Patent (19) Schnetzka et al.

Vmod (12) United States Patent US 7.411,469 B2. *Aug. 12, Perry et al. (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.:

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

United States Patent (19)

III. I. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,121,014. Huang

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US B2. Chokkalingam et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 1, 2009

2,957,143. Oct. 18, 1960 LOUIS H. ENLOE. ATTORNEYs. Filed Sept. ll, Sheets-Sheet l L. H. ENLOE WIDEBAND TRANSISTOR AMPLIFIER INVENTOR

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,013,715 B2

Alexander (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 17, 1992

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,560,992 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1. Yamamoto et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2004

III IIIIHIIII. United States Patent 19 Mo. Timing & WIN. Control Circuit. 11 Patent Number: 5,512, Date of Patent: Apr.

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,512,361 B1

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,889,643 Elms (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 30, 1999

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6, 177,908 B1

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Onuki et al.

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Nilssen

United States Patent (19) Archibald

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,512,817. Nagaraj (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 30, 1996

HII. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,087,922. Tang et al. "Experimental Results of a Multifrequency Array An

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,353,344 B1

United States Patent (19) 11) 4,163,947

United States Patent (19) (11) 4,130,822

United States Patent (19)

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7, B2. Drottar (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007

l O00000 G. B BY ) 7s.6-- 7taurold 0. Aeterson June 22, 1948, H, O, PETERSON 2,443,746 TUBE REACTANCE AND MODULATOR Filed Dec. l. l943 3.

rectifying smoothing circuit

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,433,976 B1. Phillips (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 13, 2002

F1 OSCILLATOR. United States Patent (19) Masaki 4,834,701 OSCILLATOR. May 30, Patent Number:, (45) Date of Patent:

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

USOO513828OA. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,138,280. Gingrich et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 11, 1992

TUNED AMPLIFIERS 5.1 Introduction: Coil Losses:

Chapter.8: Oscillators

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,892,398 Candy (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 6, 1999

United States Patent (19) Davis

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,879,224 B2. Frank (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 12, 2005

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,831,842 Ogasawara et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 3, 1998

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

Hill, N.J. 21) Appl. No.: 758, Filed: Sep. 12, Int. Cl.5... GO2B 6/00; GO2B 6/36 52 U.S.C /24; 372/30

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,577,002 B2. Yang (45) Date of Patent: *Aug. 18, 2009

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(Gp) 3SNOdS3d. (so noosh W) May 7, 1963 B. B. BAUER 3,088,997 MVT)3O. p 3. NVENTOR BENJAMEN B. BAUER STEREOPHONIC TO BINAURAL CONVERSION APPARATUS

United States Patent (19) Price et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,557,649 B2

(12) United States Patent

IIHIII III. Azé V-y (Y. United States Patent (19) Remillard et al. Aa a C (> 2,4122.2% Z4622 C. A. 422 s (2/7aa/Z eazazazzasa saaaaaze

CHAPTER - 6 PIN DIODE CONTROL CIRCUITS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Hanson

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,496,075 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,080,983 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,937,567 B2

Transcription:

O HIHHHHHHHHHHHHIII USOO5272450A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,272,450 Wisherd (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 21, 1993 (54) DCFEED NETWORK FOR WIDEBANDRF POWER AMPLIFIER FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 2236028 3/1991 United Kingdom... 330/277 75) Inventor: David S. Wisherd, Sunnyvale, Calif. OTHER PUBLICATIONS 73) Assignee: Microwave Modules & Devices, Inc., Mountain View, Calif. Transistor Band-Pass Amplifiers, Radio Corporation of America RCA, Victor Division, Dec. 15th 1949. Primary Examiner-Robert J. Pascal (21) Appl. No.: 717,844 Assistant Examiner-Tan Dinh Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Townsend and Townsend 22) Filed: Jun. 20, 1991 Khourie and Crew 57 ABSTRACT - 5 s so s so o s a spoo a a a 8 to a on 8 w a 336/. The frequency response of an RF power amplifier in a 58 Fi id of search 330/.297 192 '30s 47 Cellular Phone Base station is improved by providing a (58) Fie etc................ y y s s shunt capacitor with the choke coil which intercon 330/ 148, 154, 306 nects a DC power source to the active device of the amplifier. The cutoff frequency of the bias network can 56) References Cited be adjusted so that sum and difference frequencies of U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS multiple-input signals are not attenuated by the feed 3,054,969 9/1962 Harrison... too network thereby permitting the sum and difference... 330/149 frequency signals to be shunted to ground. The linearity 330/297 and bandwidth of the power amplifier is thus improved. 4,172.237 0/1979 Rankin... 4,232,272 11/1991 Fabri... 4,764,736 8/1988 Usui et al. 5,036.292 7/1991 Hjelm et al.....330/297 330/.297 4 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets 22 \-?ACTIVE) DEVICE, MISE u- C R 2 24 D. C. SOURCE R F BYPASS 120 are - - - - - - an air as us us aims an u on am as as as a

U.S. Patent Dec. 21, 1993 Sheet 1 of 3 5,272,450 f ACTIVE DEVICE, MISS

U.S. Patent Dec. 21, 1993 Sheet 2 of 3-5,272,450 BIAS NETWORK IMPEDANCE RESPONSE v Fb-O FC FC Fb. FO--b BIAS NETWORK CUT-OFF FREQUENCY SIGNAL POWER AT POINT X FIG, 3A BIAS NETWORK IMPEDANCE RESPONSE v FC Fb-O Fo Fb FO-b FIG. 3B

U.S. Patent Dec. 21, 1993 Sheet 3 of 3 5,272,450 {ACTIVE, 24 - C R 2 SIGNAL POWER AT POINT X D. C. SOURCE Y IC R F BYPASS 120 41 FIG. 4 BIAS NETWORK RESPONSE Fb-O FC FC Fib FC2 Fo--b f FIG. 5 SIGNAL FREQUENCY SPECTRUM 1M 2M 5 10 15 18 25f FIG, 6

1 DC FEED NETWORK FOR WIDEBAND RF POWER AMPLFER BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates generally to RF power amplifi ers, and more particularly the invention relates to an improved DC voltage feed network to a power ampli fier thereby permitting improved wideband operation. DC electrical power for an RF power amplifier is normally connected to a bipolar transistor collector or to an FET transistor drain through a coil or choke to minimize attenuation of the amplified carrier signal and loss of power in undesired heating of the choke. Refer ring to FIG. 1, the conventional circuit includes an RF bypass capacitor in the DC power source with the power source connected to the power amplifier active device through the choke which is represented by an inductance, L1, and a small parasitic resistance R1. An output matching network connects the power amplifier to the load, RL. The choke impedance L1 is selected to be approxi mately 10 times or greater than the transformed value of the load impedance, RL, at the point X, thereby elimi nating any loading effect on the RF signal. The charac teristics of any RF choke will vary with frequency, from characteristics resembling those of a parallel reso nant circuit of high impedance, to those of a series reso nant circuit where the impedance is lowest. In between these extremes the choke will show varying amounts of inductive or capacitive reactance and, the choke will also have a small amount of parasitic resistance, RS. The idealized signal attenuation of the bias network shown in FIG. 1 is shown in FIG. 2 where for is a cutoff fre quency of the inductive network. In a parallel feed circuit, the choke is shunted across the load and is subject to the full output RF voltage. If the choke does not present a relatively high impedance, sufficient power will be absorbed by the choke parasitic resistance to cause undesired heating and power loss. To avoid this, the choke must have a sufficiently high reactance to be effective at the lowest operating fre quency and yet have no series resonances across the operating frequency band. An appropriate value capaci tor, C1, is used to shunt the DC input and decouple residual RF from the DC source. Power amplifiers are used where the efficiency and output power of an amplifying circuit are important considerations. The various types of power amplifiers are identified by their classes of operation, i.e. classes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and S. Except for class A, all of these amplifier types are easily differentiated from small signal amplifiers by their circuit configurations, meth ods of operations, or both. There is no sharp dividing line between small signal and class A power amplifiers, the choice of terms depends on the intent of the de signer. Class A solid state power amplifiers are capable of providing highly linear amplification. However, they are considered cost prohibitive for high power transmit ters (e.g. greater than 100 watts) because of relatively low power efficiency. Class B or AB solid state power amplifiers do not have the high dynamic range linearity that class A solid state power amplifiers have. However, the power that the class B and AB amplifiers can provide is typically 3-5 times greater with far superior efficiency. A solid state device in a class A power amplifier is always bi ased fully on, which means the device will pull the same 5,272,450 5 O 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 65 2 current through the bias network whether it is amplify ing a large signal or a small signal. The transistor in a class B or AB power amplifier is biased so that it is only slightly on, it will pull from the bias network current in proportion to the signal driving the amplifier. When the amplifier is transmitting the highest average power, it will pull the required current needed to get full power out. However, when transmitting a signal has less aver age power, a significantly less amount of current will be drawn. Class B and AB power amplifiers built with power Semiconductor devices and operating with the classical bias scheme shown in FIG. 1 exhibit non-linearities that should be reduced if the output is to reproduce a multi tone input signal with reasonable fidelity. When more than one tone are amplified simultaneously (e.g. signals FA and FB) a frequency difference signal is generated (FB.A). The bias network must not significantly attenu ate either the DC current or the current at the differ ence frequency (FB-4) at the output point X in FIG. 1. That is, the choke should filter out the difference fre quency FB-A. If a difference signal FB4 is attenuated by the choke, undesired distortions will be generated at the output of the amplifier. The classical filter response as shown in FIG. 2 does not provide significant attenuation of the difference signal for a multi-tone input so long as the signals are close in frequency, as shown in FIG. 3A. However, in the case of Cellular Phone Base station amplifier signals, the frequency separation between F4 and FB can be as much as 30 MHz, and therefore the difference signal may occur at a frequency that is high enough to fall in the attenuation band of the D.C. feed network as shown in FIG. 3B. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the invention is an im proved power amplifier having low distortion when multiple frequency signals are amplified. Another object of the invention is an improved DC power feed network for a power amplifier which re duces signal distortion. A feature of the invention is a parallel tuned circuit in the DC bias feed network which presents low impe dance to frequency difference signals in a multiple fre quency power amplifier and high impedance to the multiple frequency output signals. The invention and objects and features thereof will be more readily understood from the following detailed description and dependent claims when taken with the drawing. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIG. 1 is a schematic illustrating a conventional DC feed network for an RF power amplifier. FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the idealized character istic attenuation, A, of the DC feed network of FIG. 1 where fo is the cutoff frequency of the inductive net work. FIG. 3A is a graph illustrating the attenuation charac teristics of a conventional feed network for a multiple frequency signal power amplifier in which the fre quency difference signal fb-a, lies outside of the cutoff frequency fo. FIG. 3B is a graph illustrating the characteristics of a conventional feed network for a multiple frequency

3 signal power amplifier in which the frequency differ ence signal fb.a lies inside the cutoff frequency, fc. FIG. 4 is a schematic of a power amplifier and DC feed network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the attenuation charac teristics of the feed network of FIG. 4. FIG. 6 is a generalized plot illustrating intermodula tion distortion of the conventional power amplifier of FIG. 1 and of the power amplifier in accordance with the invention of FIG. 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS Referring again to the drawings, FIG. 4 is a sche matic illustrating a power amplifier and DC feed net work in accordance with one embodiment of the inven tion. In this embodiment, the DC source shown gener ally at 20 including the RF bypass capacitor C is seri ally connected to the active device 22 at the output point X by a parallel circuit including a capacitor C2 and the choke coil illustrated by the inductance L and the parasitic resistance R. In an alternative embodi 5,272,450 ment, a ground connection can be made at point Y of 25 by 5 10 15 20 4. tion response can be varied as a function of frequency difference depending on specific circuit design. In one embodiment a class AB amplifier designed for use in a Cellular Phone base station transmitter operat ing in the frequency band from 865 MHz to 900 MHz was fabricated using a solid state RF power device, The amplifier had no less than 9 db gain, 150 watts of output power, and more than 50% efficiency when operated at 26 volts DC bias voltage and excited with a single input tone through its frequency band. There has been described a multiple frequency RF power amplifier having an improved wideband DC feed network. While the invention has been described with reference to a specific embodiment, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art with out departing from the true spirit and scope of the in vention as defined by the appended claims. What is claimed is: 1. A broadband multiple frequency CLASS AB RF power amplifier for multiple frequency input signals and having an active device with an output terminal and a DC power supply for the active device characterized the DC feed network, also. The output of the active device 22 is connected through output matching net the DC power including an RF bypass capacitor work 24 to the load device (e.g. antenna) RL. connected to ground and serially connected to said The parallel combination of capacitor C2 and the output terminal of said active device through a choke coil, L1 and R1, selectively presents a high impe parallel circuit including a choke coil and a capaci 30 tor, dance to the output signals while letting the DC bias said choke coil and said capacitor establishing a cut follow the difference signal amplitude to diminish dis off frequency for RF signals which is higher than tortion effects due to bias clipping in the amplifier when the difference frequency of said multiple frequency operated class B or AB, as shown in FIG. 5. The biased input signals whereby signals at the difference fre network response illustrated in the plot of FIG. 5 per 35 quency are shunted to ground through said RF mits maximum signal output power for the multi-tone bypass capacitor. signals, fa and fb, while minimizing the power of the 2. An RF power amplifier for use in a Cellular Phone difference frequency, fb-4, and the sum frequency, Base station in which multiple tone input signals are F-B, which lie outside of the cutoff frequencies fo amplified, said amplifier comprising and for of the bias network. Accordingly, the sum and 40 an output terminal for amplifying said multiple tone difference frequencies of the multi-input tones are effec input signals, said active device having an output tively shunted to ground through RF bypass capacitor terminal, C1 due to the frequency characteristics of the parallel a load device, circuit, an output matching network interconnecting said The attenuation response of the bias network can be 45 load device and said output terminal, generalized as illustrated in the plot of FIG. 6 where the DC power supply, absolute value of intermodulation distortion is plotted a feed network connecting said DC power supply to against the difference frequency, Af, between two input said active device including an RF bypass capaci signals. The low frequency intermodulation distortion tor connected to ground and serially connected to 50 (i.e. -35 db) is due to the active device. The increase in said output terminal through a parallel circuit in intermodulation distortion with frequency is due to the cluding a choke coil and a capacitor, said parallel DC bias network. The response for a conventional feed circuit providing low inductance to signals at the network is shown at 32 in which the intermodulation difference frequency of said multiple tone input distortion drops from -30 db to -20 db when the signals whereby said signals at the difference fre 55 frequency difference increases from 0 to 5 MHz. On the quency are shunted to ground through said RF other hand, the attenuation response of the bias network bypass capacitor and intermodulation distortion is reduced. in accordance with the invention as illustrated at 34 maintains the -30 db intermodulation distortion to 3. The RF power amplifier as defined by claim 2 approximately 15 MHz and does not drop to -20 db wherein said feed network has intermodulation distor 60 until the frequency difference exceeds 25 MHz. Ac tion less than -30 db for a difference frequency up to 10 megahertz. cordingly, it is seen that the operating characteristics of the power amplifier through use of a bias feed network 4. The RF power amplifier as defined by claim 2 in accordance with the invention broadens the video wherein said DC bias feed network has a frequency response including a cutoff frequency higher than a frequency bandwidth of a power amplifier while mini- 65 difference frequency of two RF inputs to the RF power mizing distortion of the amplifier signals. It will be amplifier. appreciated that intermodulation distortion and attenua k k. k k