-i. DDs. (12) United States Patent US 6,201,214 B1. Mar. 13, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: aeeeeeeea. Duffin

Similar documents
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,346,966 B1

don, G.B. U.S. P. DOCUMENTS spaced by an air gap from the collecting lens. The widths of

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,386,952 B1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,525,828 B1

(12) United States Patent

IIII. United States Patent (19) Luhm. 5,580,202 Dec. 3, (11 Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent:

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 8,083,443 B1. Circosta et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 27, 2011

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,543,599 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,805,823 B2. Sembritzky et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 5, 2010

Imaging Systems for Eyeglass-Based Display Devices

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,948,658 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,715,221 B1. Sasaki (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 6, 2004

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent 19

issi Field of search. 348/36, , 33) of the turret punch press machine; an image of the

(12) United States Patent

73 Assignee: Dialight Corporation, Manasquan, N.J. 21 Appl. No.: 09/144, Filed: Aug. 31, 1998 (51) Int. Cl... G05F /158; 315/307

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1

United States Patent (19) Lund

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,915,597 B2. Jungkind (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 12, 2005

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,615,108 B1

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Nonami

(12) United States Patent

TEPZZ 7 8 9ZA_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1. (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.684,688 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,462,700 B1. Schmidt et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 8, 2002

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,224,230 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,938,485 B2

part data signal (12) United States Patent control 33 er m - sm is US 7,119,773 B2

United States Patent 19) 11 Patent Number: 5,442,436 Lawson (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 15, 1995

United States Patent (19) Rottmerhusen

75) Inventor: Charles L. Truman, Hendersonville, N.C. 57 ABSTRACT

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.704,201 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1. Alberts et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 4, 2009

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,217,246 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,836,894 B2. Gu et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 16, 2014 DISPLAY DEVICE GO2F I/3.3.3 (2006.

Hsu (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 27, PICTURE FRAME Primary Examiner-Kenneth J. Dorner. Assistant Examiner-Brian K. Green

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,614,995 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,765,631 B2. Ishikawa et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 20, 2004

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent 6,288,358 Dulaney, et al. September 11, **Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) ** Abstract

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,593,696 B2

United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 5,621,555 Park (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 15, 1997 LLP 57)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,920,822 B2

58 Field of Search /372, 377, array are provided with respectively different serial pipe

Economou. May 14, 2002 (DE) Aug. 13, 2002 (DE) (51) Int. Cl... G01R 31/08

Optical spray painting practice and training system

III. United States Patent (19) Fazio. 73) Assignee: Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., from the photodiode is routed through a bandpass filter,

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,387,795 B1

202 19' 19 19' (12) United States Patent 202' US 7,050,043 B2. Huang et al. May 23, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,991,083 Shirochi (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 23, 1999

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent 19 Perets

II I III. United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation,

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,433,976 B1. Phillips (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 13, 2002

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,879,224 B2. Frank (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 12, 2005

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,729,834 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1. Muza (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 6, 2012 HIGH IMPEDANCE BASING NETWORK (57) ABSTRACT

(12) United States Patent

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,850,085 B2. Claessen (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 14, 2010

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,388,807 B1. Knebel et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 14, 2002

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,995,883 Nishikado (45) Date of Patent: Nov.30, 1999

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

United States Patent (19) Sun

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,957,665 B2

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,226,021 B1. Anderson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007

III. United States Patent (19) Ruzskai et al. 11 Patent Number: 5,580,295 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 3, 1996

Universal mounting bracket for laser targeting and feedback system

Laser peening of dovetail slots by fiber optical and articulate arm beam delivery. Abstract

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US B2. Chokkalingam et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 1, 2009

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,750,955 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,725,069 B2. Sprigg et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 20, 2004

(12) United States Patent

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2011/40

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,561,091 B1

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,088,248 Manna 45) Date of Patent: Feb. 18, 1992

Kiuchi et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 8, 2011

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,681,489 B1. Fleming (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 27, 2004

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,559,941 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,436,044 B1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Geddes et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,438,377 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1. Yoshizawa et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 5, 2009

Transcription:

(12) United States Patent Duffin USOO62O1214B1 (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 13, 2001 (54) LASER DRILLING WITH OPTICAL FEEDBACK (75) Inventor: Jason E. Duffin, Leicestershire (GB) (73) Assignee: M. J. Technologies, Limited, Leicestershire (GB) (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (21) Appl. No.: 09/295,116 (22) Filed: Apr. 19, 1999 (51) Int. Cl."... B23K 26/00; B23K 26/02; B23K 26/04; B23K 26/08; B23K 26/10 (52) U.S. Cl.... 219/121.71; 219/121.66; 219/121.72; 219/121.78; 219/121.79; 219/121.82; 219/121.81; 219/121.83 (58) Field of Search... 219/121.71, 121.62, 219/121.66, 121.72, 121.78, 121.79, 121.82, 121.81, 121.83 (56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,673,795 6/1987 Ortiz, Jr.... 219/121 L 4,873,414 * 10/1989 Ma et al....... 219/121.7 5,011,626 * 4/1991 Ma et al....... 252/582 5,026,964 6/1991. Somers et al. 219/121.7 5,697,120 12/1997 Robinson... 15/321 5,698,120 12/1997 Kurosawa et al.... 219/121.62 5,798,524 8/1998 Kundmann et al.... 250/305 5,811,754 * 9/1998 Nakatani et al....... 219/121.83 5,910,894 * 6/1999 Pryor...... 364/468.01 5.991,015 11/1999 Zamel et al.... 256/222 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS O 344 339 6/1989 (EP). 0937532A1 * 8/1999 (EP). 2 113592 10/1983 (GB). * cited by examiner Primary Examiner Patrick Ryan ASSistant Examiner-Colleen Cooke (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C. (57) ABSTRACT The invention provides a method of drilling holes Sequen tially through a workpiece using a laser gun with a camera positioned axially in-line with the drilling beam of the laser gun. Each image from the camera is analysed by digital image processing techniques to control the positioning of the laser nozzle relative to the workpiece and/or to compensate for errors produced in previously drilled holes. By feedback from the digitally processed images it is possible to repeat the auto-focusing of the laser automatically throughout the drilling of a large number of holes in the same workpiece, to adjust the drilling of Subsequent holes in order to bring the hole characteristics closed to a predefined optimum, or to abort work on a particular workpiece if hole diameters exceed a given tolerance range. 6 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets 1 7 fibre optic light source 2 -i. DDs Mains Power Supply via transformer input:230vac output: 12V DC 12 Processor 10 Television Monitor - toget nox sex was unsanese aeeeeeeea

U.S. Patent Mar. 13, 2001 Sheet 2 of 2 Figure 2

1 LASER DRILLING WITH OPTICAL FEEDBACK BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The invention relates to the general field of the use of pulsed lasers as drilling, boring or cutting tools. In Such laser machining an accurately focused laser beam is directed against a workpiece So as to vaporize a portion of that Workpiece. The invention provides an automated method for drilling a number of holes Sequentially through the same Workpiece. 2. Description of the Related Art It is known to provide pulsed YAG lasers of the kind used for hole drilling with in-line cameras, So that the operator can See on a visual display Screen an image of the target area of the workpiece before drilling commences and after drill ing is complete. The displayed image is purely for the laser operator's benefit. It has, however, been proposed that the positioning of the nozzle of the laser relative to the target area of the workpiece Surface can be accurately controlled by a manual adjustment of the laser nozzle relative to the workpiece until the image displayed on the VDU by the in-line camera becomes Sharply in focus. Such a manual adjustment is, however, Slow and Subjective, and other methods of accurately positioning the laser nozzle are gen erally preferred. One such method involves moving the nozzle until it touches the workpiece, and then moving backwards by a defined distance. That method requires an electrically conductive workpiece Surface, So that an elec trical Signal can be generated to indicate the moment of touching. Another method of rapidly positioning the nozzle relative to the workpiece prior to drilling involves the measurement of the capacitance of the gap between the nozzle and the workpiece. This method is effective and is normally accurate. It is however Susceptible to error if the humidity of the air between the nozzle and the workpiece varies significantly, if the workpiece is ceramic-coated (in which case the capacitance measurement automatically includes that of the ceramic coating over the underlying metal Surface of the workpiece) or if the nozzle is presented to the workpiece at a particularly low angle of incidence. The manual adjustment of the position of the laser relative to the workpiece is extremely slow, and is used for initial Set-up only. After that initial Set-up, the laser is used to drill a very large number of holes in the workpiece (Sometimes in excess of 400 accurately placed holes) without a further check on the accuracy of the nozzle position. This invention contemplates for the first time a rapid and automatic method of determining an accurate spacing between the nozzle and the workpiece prior to drilling. The invention also provides an accurate check on the size and accuracy of each hole as it is drilled, thus enabling the entire drilling cycle of multiple holes to be automated. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention provides a method of drilling holes Sequen tially through a workpiece using a laser gun with a camera positioned axially in-line with the drilling beam of the laser gun, characterized in that each image from the camera is analysed by digital image processing techniques to control the positioning of the laser nozzle relative to the workpiece and/or to compensate for errors produced in previously drilled holes. In a first embodiment of the invention the camera image is digitally processed using optical auto-focus techniques, 15 25 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 2 and the output from that image processing is used to bring the nozzle of the laser head to a predefined optimum starting position relative to the workpiece. For example, the contrast between individual grains of the Surface crystal Structure of the workpiece can be used to control the auto-focussing of the camera by the movement of the nozzle towards and away from the workpiece. In another embodiment, the digital image processing techniques are used after the drilling of each hole to compare parameters of the drilled hole, Such as its size and circularity, with a computer simulation of a preferred drilled hole, or with permitted predefined tolerances for the drilled hole, and the drilling of the next hole in the Sequence is modified as a consequence of that comparison. For example, the above feedback may include the step of aborting all further work on a given workpiece if the comparison shows that the last completed drilled hole is outside the prescribed permitted tolerances. If the last completed drilled hole is within the prescribed permitted tolerances but the hole characteristics still deviate from those prescribed for the optimum desired drilled hole, then the feedback preferably includes the step of modifying the drilling characteristics of the next hole to be drilled in the Sequence, to make that next drilled hole a better match for the prescribed optimum drilled hole param eters. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a general arrangement drawing for a laser drilling machine organized to drill in accordance with the method of the invention; FIG. 2 is a series of four images of holes each of which has been drilled by the laser of FIG. 1. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In FIG. 1, the apparatus needed to carry out the method of the invention can be Summarized as comprising a laser 2 with an in-line camera 1 mounted in position. The camera 1 is focused on the workpiece through a 45 one-way YAG mirror which reflects the laser beam onto the workpiece but allows an image of the target Zone on the workpiece to be transmitted through the mirror without reflection for capture by the camera. The laser is shown focussed on a workpiece 4, with the Zone of cutting being illuminated by a fibre optic illumination lamp 3 powered by a fibre optic light source 7. The entire cutting apparatus sits Securely on a bed 5 which also Supports the workpiece 4. An in-line camera 1, aligned to look directly along the axis of the laser 2 and through the nozzle 3, has in the past been used Simply as a focusing aid for the manual focusing of the laser onto the workpiece. In accordance with the invention, however, the in-line camera 1 Sends its data through a processor 10 to a monitor Screen 12 and/or a personal computer 14. On initial Set-up, the camera uses known optical auto focusing techniques involving digital image processing to move the nozzle relative to the workpiece until perfect focus has been achieved. Using modern rapid techniques, this refocusing of the laser can be repeated periodically through out the drilling of a large number of holes. Indeed it is feasible that the automatic refocusing could take place after each hole drilled, although in practice it is likely to be Sufficient to drill a number of holes in Succession before reinitiating the auto-focus process. At the completion of drilling of each hole, the same optical camera using digital image processing techniques

3 can provide digital data to the controlling processor to permit an assessment of the accuracy of the drilled hole. ParameterS Such as diameter and circularity of the hole can be monitored, and optionally by using best fit digital processing techniques the characteristics of the drilled hole can be compared with those of an optimum desired drilled hole. Alternatively or in addition, the deviation of the characteristics of the drilled hole from those of the optimum desired drilled hole can be compared with permitted tolerances, and the drilling of the next hole in the Sequence modified as a consequence of the different comparisons. For example, if the first comparison shows that the drilled hole is marginally Smaller than the optimum desired drilled hole, then the next hole in the Sequence can be drilled slightly larger. If the drilled hole being examined is found to be beyond the permitted tolerances, then the entire drilling Sequence of holes in that particular workpiece may be automatically aborted. The use of digital image processing techniques as outlined above permits a spectacular improvement in the efficiency and Speed of drilling of multiple holes through a workpiece, and represents a massive increase in the efficiency and accuracy of the drilling process. What is claimed is: 1. A method of drilling holes Sequentially through a Workpiece using a laser gun with a camera positioned axially in-line with the drilling beam of the laser gun, wherein each image from the camera is analysed by digital image pro 15 25 4 cessing techniques to control the positioning of the laser nozzle relative to the workpiece and to compensate for errors produced in previously drilled holes. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the Zone of interaction between the laser beam and the workpiece is illuminated by means of a fibre-optic light Source, for observation by the camera. 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein each image from the camera is digitally processed using optical auto focus techniques, and the output from that image processing is used to bring a nozzle of the laser head to a predefined optimum starting position relative to the workpiece. 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the automatic refocusing of the laser is repeated periodically throughout the drilling of a large number of holes in a workpiece. 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein each image from the camera is Subjected to a digital image processing technique to compare the drilled hole with the optimum desired drilled hole or with permitted tolerances for the drilled hole; and the drilling of the next hole in the Sequence is modified as a consequence of that comparison. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the feedback includes the Step of aborting all work on that workpiece if the comparison shows that the last completed drilled hole is outside of the prescribed permitted tolerances.