NASA s Electric Propulsion Program

Similar documents
In Space Propulsion Overview January Outline. Les Johnson Manager, In Space Propulsion Technology Projects Office

CubeSat Propulsion using Electrospray Thrusters

world leader in capacity, performance and costefficiency.

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Project of space experiment "Shadow" on ISS

WHAT IS A CUBESAT? DragonSat-1 (1U CubeSat)

Moog CSA Engineering CubeSat Payload Accommodations and Propulsive Adapters. 11 th Annual CubeSat Developer s Workshop 25 April 2014

Electric Propulsion System for CubeSats - Hardware, Test Results and Current Development Activities

Nanosat Deorbit and Recovery System to Enable New Missions

SPACE. (Some space topics are also listed under Mechatronic topics)

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Leveraging Commercial Communication Satellites to support the Space Situational Awareness Mission Area. Timothy L. Deaver Americom Government Services

Abstract IEPC

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIC RESEARCH CLUSTER ON IN-SPACE

X/Y Antenna Ground Terminals: A Small Sat Cost Effective Approach

MicroVacuum Arc Thruster Design for a CubeSat Class Satellite

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

PERSPECTIVES ON PROPULSION FOR FUTURE SPACE MISSIONS

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

A TIMKEN COMPANY SUBSIDIARY

Strategic Research Cluster on Electric Propulsion H2020 Space call text 2016 & related Guidelines document

Technologies and Prospects of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle

Introduction. Contents. Introduction 2. What does spacefaring mean?

ASTE 572 Advanced Spacecraft Propulsion Spring 2015 Schedule

JHU/APL CubeSat Summary. Andy Lewin 11 August 2007

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

2.0 Launch Vehicle Technologies 2.1 Introduction

STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR SMALL AND MIDDLE POWERS

launch probability of success

The International Lunar Network (ILN) and the US Anchor Nodes mission

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

Airbus DS ESA Phase-0 L5 Spacecraft/Orbital Concept Overview. Emanuele Monchieri 6 th March 2017

Cover. DLR-ESA Workshop on ARTES-11. SGEO: Implementation of of Artes-11. Dr. Andreas Winkler

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

40 kg to LEO: A Low Cost Launcher for Australia. By Nicholas Jamieson

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

DISRUPTIVE SPACE TECHNOLOGY. Jim Benson SpaceDev Stowe Drive Poway, CA Telephone:

IONOSFERE Satellite with APPT Based EPS

BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT FY12 TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION MISSIONS PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TECHNOLOGIST PROPOSALS DUE.

CubeSat Launch and Deployment Accommodations

ASTE 572 Advanced Spacecraft Propulsion Spring 2018 Schedule

Science Applications International Corporation 1710 Goodridge Drive, McLean, Virginia (703) Abstract

SPACE ENVIRONMENTS AND EFFECTS (SEE) PROGRAM: SPACECRAFT CHARGING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

SPACE DEBRIS MENACE. GLYCAN SPACE XR- HELIOTORR Corp LLC Pasadena CA

Solar Observing Low-frequency Array for Radio Astronomy (SOLARA)

CubeSat Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion Systems providing DVs greater than 500 m/s

Performance Dependence on Microwave Frequency and Discharge Chamber Geometry of the Water Ion Thruster

Interplanetary CubeSat Launch Opportunities and Payload Accommodations

Satellite Technology for Future Applications

The Nemo Bus: A Third Generation Nanosatellite Bus for Earth Monitoring and Observation

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

Low-Cost Innovation in the U.S. Space Program: A Brief History

Peak Power Tracking and Multi-Thruster Control in Direct Drive Systems

Performance Mapping and Qualification of the IFM Nano Thruster FM for in Orbit Demonstration

Miguel A. Aguirre. Introduction to Space. Systems. Design and Synthesis. ) Springer

JHU/APL CubeSat Initiatives. Andy Lewin 19 April 2007

2013 RockSat-C Preliminary Design Review

Introduction to MATE-CON. Presented By Hugh McManus Metis Design 3/27/03

chairs IEEE EMC symposium technical sessions. He is often tutorial workshops and technical demonstrations at IEEE EMC international symposiums.

Hall Effect Thruster for small satellites EPIC 25/10/2017 Do not disclose without the explicit consent of Exotrail 1

On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA

MSL Lessons Learned Study. Presentation to NAC Planetary Protection Subcommittee April 29, 2013 Mark Saunders, Study Lead

The NASA and LVX System Partnership for Development of Light Communication Technologies

SPACE SYSTEM AND ENGINEERING IN AFRICA: NIGERIA AS A CASE STUDY

The Aerospace Corporation s Concept Design Center

Piezoelectric Transformers for Space Applications

ICO Space Segment. Senior Vice President Space Systems

THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN SMALL SATELLITE RESEARCH

Red Dragon. Feasibility of a Dragon-derived Mars lander for scientific and human-precursor missions. May 7, 2013

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

Space Systems Engineering

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

NOAA EON-IR CubeSat Study for Operational Infrared Soundings

SOME ASPECT AND PERSPECTIVES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL POLICY IN THE FIELD OF EXPLORATION AND PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE

Electric Solar Wind Sail tether payloads onboard CubeSats

Benefits of Standardization in National Space Activities: ASI and the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS)

Technology Capabilities and Gaps Roadmap

ELaNa Educational Launch of Nanosatellite Providing Routine RideShare Opportunities

Micro-size Cryocooler Control Electronics

The FAST, Affordable, Science and Technology Satellite (FASTSAT) Mission

Constellation Systems Division

The Evolution of Nano-Satellite Proximity Operations In-Space Inspection Workshop 2017

Fault Management Architectures and the Challenges of Providing Software Assurance

Developing the Miniature Tether Electrodynamics Experiment Completion of Key Milestones and Future Work

Automation & Robotics (A&R) for Space Applications in the German Space Program

Research Activities on Small Satellite in HIT

1. SMOS Status 1.1 Payload 1.2 Platform 1.3 Satellite 1.4 Launcher 1.5 FOS 1.6 DPGS 2. Other Developments 3. Future (Near & Far) 4.

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

RHETTlEPDM POWER PROCESSING UNIT. Peter T. Skelly and Robert J. Kay PRIMEX Aerospace Company Redmond, WA. Abstract

Small Satellites for Space Weather Research

University Nanosat Program

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3B Product Development Plan

Incorporating a Test Flight into the Standard Development Cycle

CubeSat Design Specification

Transcription:

IEPC-97-003 20 NASA s Electric Propulsion Program Francis M. Curran and Timothy E. Tyburski National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center 21000 Brookpark Road, Mail Stop 301-3, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44135 Abstract In most space missions, on-board propulsion systems comprise a significant portion of the total spacecraft mass and are, in fact, often the largest mass spacecraft subsystem. The development of innovative, high performance on-board propulsion systems can provide significant leverage to improve mission performance. Recent trends toward the use of smaller spacecraft and launch vehicles will likely increase the need for new on-board propulsion systems. Electric propulsion systems can be used to reduce spacecraft launch mass, extend mission life, and or enable new missions/functions. The use of electric propulsion is expanding in all space sectors with systems being used, or readied for use, for orbital insertion, deorbit, stationkeeping, precision positioning and repositioning, attitude control, and primary and secondary propulsion for planetary exploration. NASA clearly recognizes the need for new, high performance electric propulsion technologies for the near-, mid- and far-terms and sponsors aggressive efforts in this area. These efforts are mainly conducted under the Office of Space Science crosscutting On-Board Propulsion (OBP) program as implemented through the Lewis Research Center and coordinated with Marshall Space Flight Center s Advanced Space Transportation Program (ASTP). The ASTP also provides resources for the development of high performance, high power systems for very ambitious missions including human exploration. NASA s electric propulsion efforts are closely coordinated with Department of Defense and other national programs to assure the most effective use of available resources. As in the past, NASA continues to work closely with the supplier and user communities to maximize the potential for the acceptance of new technology in a timely and cost-effective manner. This paper provides an overview of NASA s activities in the area of electric propulsion with an emphasis on program directions and recent progress. Introduction On-board propulsion system mass fractions continue to drive mission performance across a wide range of Earth-orbital and deep space missions, Low and mid- Earth-orbit (LEO/MEO) satellites typically require on-board propulsion systems accounting for between 20 and 40 percent of total injected mass. Geostationary (GEO) satellites and planetary spacecraft are routinely have injected mass fractions above 0.5. Innovative on-board propulsion systems which provide significant performance benefits over state-of-art devices, therefore, can provide substantial gains in mission performance by reducing launch vehicle requirements, increasing spacecraft life, and/or improving payload fractions. New systems can often also provide dramatic improvements in functionality, enhancing or enabling new missions requiring, for example, precision positioning and/or formantion flying. New requirements for deorbit, reductions in ground operations costs, as well as environmental concerns, will also drive the development advanced spacecraft propulsion systems. The benefits of high performance electric systems are now widely recognized and new technologies are beginning to be accepted across the community. Examples include 1) arcjet thrusters for north-south stationkeeping (NSSK) which are now operational on two generations of commercial GE0 communications satellites, 2) very high performance ion and Hall systems for primary and auxiliary propulsion functions, and 3) pulsed plasma thrusters for propulsive attitude control and small satellite orbital insertion. NASA s On-Board Propulsion program (OBP) has played an active role in the development and demonstration of new technologies for these nearterm missions and will continue to identify and validate key technologies for the future. The OBP is dedicated to providing superior technologies for Earth and space science missions as well as for other government and commercial applications. Research and technology development (R&TD) efforts are conducted under the cross-cutting technology program led by the Lewis Research Center (LeRC) and sponsored by NASA s Office of Space Science. The NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Applications Readiness (NSTAR) program is led by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and heavily supported by LeRC. NSTAR is jointly funded by the Office of Space Science and the Office of Aeronautics. All spacecraft propulsion activities are coordinated through the Advanced Space Transportation Program (ASTP) which is led by the Marshall Space Flight This paper is declared a work of the U. S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.

IEPC-97-003 21 Center. The ASTP and the Johnson Space Center are also supporting the development of higher power onboard electric systems for ambitious, high delta-v missions (including solar electric human exploration (HEDS)-class systems) with LeRC as the lead for electric propulsion technology development. The NASA programs are also closely coordinated with other national efforts and organizations (e.g. the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, the Naval Research Laboratory, and the joint NASA/Department of Defense Integrated High Payoff Rocket Propulsion Technology program) to assure that technology development efforts 1) will meet the needs of future mission planners and 2) are carried out in a timely and cost-effective fashion. Electric propulsion systems fall into three fundamental catagories - electromagnetic, electrostatic, and electrothermal. Each catagory has unique attributes suited to specific propulsion functions. To meet the needs of a wide range of known and anticipated users, new electromagnetic, electrostatic, and electrothermal technologies are all being considered, As with past program efforts, heavy emphasis is placed on working with potential suppliers and users in order to maximize the potential for technology transfer. Program interactions are designed to assure that commercial sources of new technologies are available and that all critical aspects of the technology, including both hardware development and spacecraft integration are addressed. This paper briefly describes major NASA spacecraft propulsion activities in all three areas of electric propulsion with an emphasis on-going efforts and anticipated directions over the next several years. Electromassetic Svstems Electromagnetic thrusters cross-cut many market segments. At this point, NASA efforts in this area are focused primarily on the development of pulsed plasma thrusters (PPT). PPTs have several unique attributes which make them attractive for a range of small satellite applications. Most devices utilize solid propellant and provide over 1000 s of specific impulse while operating at average power levels between 0.001 and 0.2 kw. Thus, PPT systems offer excellent fuel economy and fit the power range available to many small power limited spacecraft. Unlike most steady state devices, the pulsed nature of the PPT system allows power throttling over a wide range without loss in performance simply by adjusting the pulse repetition rate. Further, very small impulse bits can be attained for precision pointing applications. Use of a solid polymer propellant results in a very simple (i.e., one moving part), lightweight, low-cost, modular propulsion system that eliminates the need for toxic propellants and costly, complicated propellant distribution systems. In addition to enabling new missions such as long baseline imaging, these features also open the potential user base in the small satellite community. The NASA PPT program was initiated in FY94 and intends to develop multiple generations of PPT systems for smailsat insertion, orbit maintenance, precision positioning, repositioning, deorbit, and microspacecraft primary and ACS functions. These efforts will be carried out with industry and will leverage on-going fundamental research efforts in the Air Force to assure accessible, low cost solutions for future small spacecraft propulsion requirements. Several PPT development efforts are in progress for near term missions. First, technology for a propulsive attitude control system (ACS) is being developed for demonstration on the Earth Observer 1 (EO-1) spacecraft. EO-1 is scheduled for flight in 1999 under the NASA New Millennium Program (NMP). Shortly following the EO-1 flight, a second system employing the same basic technology will be used to demonstrate small satellite orbit transfer on the planned Air Force MightySat II.1 flight in 2000. The MightySat PPT is being developed under a joint NASA/Air Force (Phillips Lab) program and also has been baselined for future spacecraft in the MightySat series. To date, a breadboard unit has been built (see Figure 1) and flight system designs are being finalized. The breadboard unit has undergone extensive development testing and a lifetest targetted for MightySat operating conditions will be initiated shortly. Also, critical component testing has either been completed or is in progress. The EO-1 critical design review was successfully completed earier this year. Primex Aerospace Co. (PAC) is participating in the PPT program under contract to NASA, and will provide flight hardware for both the EO-1 and MightySat flights. Figure 2 shows a conceptual schematic of the EO-1 ACS configuration. In addition to the EO-1 and MightySat flights, several proprietary commercial applications for these first generation systems are also being explored. As with all program technologies, high quality system characterizations and integration impacts assessments are primary program concerns. Figure 3 shows a precision thrust balance developed specifically for the characterization of PPT s and other low thrust/low impulse bit devices. Preliminary plume impacts assessments have also been performed. In the near future a joint NASA/Air Force effort to evaluate particulate emissions in a large scale test is planned and a high fidelity, long duration, plume impacts assessment will be performed in conjuction with the upcoming bread board life test. A sophisticated plume model is being developed at Worchester Polytechnic Institute under NASA sponsorship and the above mentioned test results are designed to provide data for model verification. Beyond the first

IEPC-97-003 22 generation, NASA program efforts are geared for the realization of a high performance system for distributed, high resolution imaging missions (baselined for the proposed Deep Space 3 imaging mission) which will also be applicable to a range of formation flying missions. In fact, the relatively near-term (circa 2000) goal is to develop a dual mode unit capable of providing both precision impulse bits for precise positioning and higher thrust for spacecraft translations. NASA is also supporting the development of miniaturized, high total impulse devices for microspacecraft primary and auxiliary propulsive functions for longer range applications. Included are fundamental and applied research efforts on energy storage and delivery, advanced propellants, etc. at the Ohio State University, Auburn University, and the University of Illinois. As noted above, the program also leverages strong fundamental research efforts on advanced propellants and diagnostics at the Air Force Phillips (Edwards) Laboratory. Electrostatic Svstems Since 1993, NASA has supported a very substantial advanced development effort to validate ion propulsion technology termed the NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Application and Readiness (NSTAR) program. The NSTAR program has both ground and space elements and is designed to provide the information necessary for flight program managers to baseline solar-powered ion propulsion systems for high delta-v missions. Managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NSTAR is executed by LeRC, JPL, and industry and draws heavily on technology developed in the On-Board Propulsion program. The NSTAR system consists of a 30 cm ion engine, a power processing unit, a digital control interface unit, and a propellant storage and delivery system. The system is designed to operate between 0.5 to 2.6 kw at an overall efficiency of 55% and a nominal Isp of 3100 s. NSTAR systems will enable launch vehicle class reductions and/or significant trip time savings for planetary exploration. NSTAR technology will also be applicable to advanced Earthorbital missions with high delta-v requirements. Examples include apogee topping and stationkeeping for GE0 satellites, deorbit of large LEO spacecraft, and science missions such as magnetospheric mapping. In the NSTAR ground test program, engineering model thrusters (EMTs - see Figure 4) and breadboard power processing units (PPUs) were fabricated and an extensive test program is in progress both at JPL and LeRC. This test program includes an 8000 Life Demonstration Test (LDT) of an EMT at full power (2.3 kw) at JPL. At this writing, the LDT had recently successfully passed the 7000 hour mark and to date, not a single engine-related shutdown has occurred. In addition to integration and wear tests, the program also includes extensive environmental testing to assure spacecraft compatibility. A flight NSTAR system is now scheduled for demonstration in NASA s first New Millennium Program mission (Deep Space 1). Flight hardware is being developed in industry with the Hughes Telecommunications and Space Company (under contract to LeRC) responsible for the thruster, power processing unit, and digital control interface unit. JPL is responsible for the propellant storage and delivery system with MOOG, Inc. under contract for many of the major components and subsystems. In addition to NSTAR, requirements for technologies for higher power, higher total impulse systems have been identified for mid- and far-term missions. Lower power, long life, light weight, low cost systems are also important for future programs. To meet these needs, several R&TD efforts areas are in progress. Both low and high power cathodes are under development and an extensive ion thruster scaling and optimization program has been undertaken to evaluate and project capabilities at power levels below 1 kw, above 3 kw, and for derivative NSTAR-class systems requiring extended life for missions like the proposed rendezvous with Champollion. Research hardware development efforts have also been initiated. Figure 5, for example, shows a miniature cathode/neutralizer capable of operating efficiently at approximately 0.007 kw and very low propellant flow rates. This new technology is anticipated to be applicable to low power (sub-o.5 kw) systems as well as to high efficiency, long life NSTAR derivatives. Advanced carbon-carbon and coated grids will also be evaluated under the OBP. Russian Hall systems have been closely examined in the aerospace community over the past several years and the OBP, acting as agent for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization s (BMDO) Directorate for Science and Technology, has been deeply involved in their development and validation under the Russian Hall Electric Thruster Test (RHETT) program. In the very recent past, a low power flight system was assembled in joint program which included NASA, BMDO, the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), and both Russian and U.S. industry (Specifically TsNIIMASH, Primex Aerospace, and MOOG, Inc.) This system is scheduled for flight demonstration in the near future on a government satellite. The Electric Propulsion Module Demonstration (EPDM) is utilizing technologies developed/adapted under RHETT including a Russian thruster, a cathode developed under the NASA ion technology program, a PPU from industry, and a propellant system developed by NRL with components from industry. The EPDM unit was assembled and tested extensively in the large space simulation facility at LeRC (see

IEPC-97-003 23 Figure 6) and was recently shipped to its host spacecraft. NASA and BMDO tie currently collaborating, again with both U.S. and Russian industry, to develop and demonstrate a higher power (- 3-5 kw) Hall system for orbit transfer applications. This near-term program will once again merge technology programs in the US. and Russia to develop new capabilities for future missions. Development of very low cost power processing using commercial, off-the-shelf parts is targeted. At present, a large development effort will be undertaken over the next year with the goal of technology flight demonstration on a Russian spacecraft in late 1998 or early 1999. NASA is also very interested in low power Hall technology for power limited spacecraft (e.g. this technology has been identified as very impactive in system assessments for small satellites for Missionto-Planet Earth class missions) and the OBP has efforts in place with industry and the academic community to develop and demonstrate the capabilities of sub-kw systems for small Earthorbital satellites. These efforts will incorporate the low power cathode technology mentioned above, develop miniaturized propellant feed components and systems (also applicable to next generation ion systems), develop andvanced, low cost PPUs, and examine life issues at specific impulse levels of 2000 s and higher. In addition to the above, an ASTP-sponsored program is now in place to demonstrate and evaluate a high specific impulse (Isp 2 2000 s), high power (IO kwclass), low cost system for orbit raising, deorbit, and primary planetary propulsion applications and as a stepping stone to HEDs-class applications. This program will focus on both life demonstration at a specific impulse substantially above SOA and low cost power processing, the latter leveraging and complementing the on-going LeRC/BMDO program. Recent interest in technologies applicable to human exploration has also focus& on Hall thruster technology and significant mission and system analyses are in progress in a joint JSCNSFCILeRC effort to develop a solar electric/chemical/aerobrake (i.e. non-nuclear) option for Mars exploration. As part of this program, a high power (20-50 kw-class) research grade Hall thruster will be delivered for testing in LeRC s large space simulation testbed early next year. New developments in solar concentrator technology may be very applicable to advanced electric propulsion system development and direct drive (i.e. thruster operation directly from solar arrays with minimal power processing) options for several mission classes are being explored. While payload power system trades must be carefully considered, it is very likely that direct drive will play a role in the future, especially in high power transportation-class applications. To further the development of synergistic power/propulsion systems, an advanced concentrator testbed has been established at LeRC under joint NASA/NRL funding (see Figure 7). Recently, a Hall thruster was run successfully directly from the test bed arrays for the first time. Finally, the NASA program has been working, often with industry, to assess critical integration issues associated with high performance electrostatic technologies. These assessments include EMI, plume/communications impacts, plume contamination, etc. For example, Figure 8 shows a recent reimbursible test with Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC) designed to assess the impacts of a 1.5 kw-class Hall thruster plume on spacecraft surfaces. Electrothermal SvstemS Prior NASA OBP investments in arcjet technology have led to significant impacts in the commercial communications industry and, in fact, opened the door for other electric propulsion systems. First generation arcjets are now operational on several GE0 communications satellites and are baselined for others. Higher performance systems are baselined on LMC s new A2100 Series spacecraft. These devices were flown for the first time in September 1996 and multiple satellites incorporating this high performance technology are either being fabricated or on order. In FY97, PAC fabricated and demonstrated a low power arcjet system (LPATS) for small and/or power limited spacecraft under OBP sponsorship. This was the culmination of a joint two year effort and the LPAT system is now ready to be qualified for specific applications. As part of the LPATS effort, a miniaturized liquid hydrazine flow regulator was developed by MOOG Space Products Division. The regulator is approximately the size of a 35 mm film canister and may find application in a range of spacecraft propulsion systems. Mainline NASA arcjet development efforts for conventional spacecraft have now been concluded. The program still lends support where appropriate at assure further technology transfer. For longer range microspacecraft applications, NASA is evaluating the fundamental feasibility of a microwave thruster-on-a-chip concept with Auburn University. Finally, the OBP is helping industry (Research Support Instruments, Inc.) to evaluate both kw and 0.1 kw-class microwave electrothermal thrusters (MET) run on H20 and other propellants in a joint effort with MSFC. For this, LeRC has

IEPC-97-003 24 developed a precision water metering and delivery system (including steam generation) and modified a precision thrust stand to accomodate the industrysupplied system. Several tests have been conducted to date and a further test program is planned for the near future. Concludine Remarks In-space propulsion continues to be a significant performance driver for many mission applications. To meet known and anticipated mission performance goals in the future, innovative electric propulsion systems will be required. To this end, NASA sponsors aggressive programs to develop new electric propulsion systems for a wide variety of space systems. The scope of the program extends from low power systems (sub-o.1 kw) for miniature/micro spacecraft for space exploration and h4tf E-class missions to very high power (50-100 kw) systems for REDS-class endeavors. To date, multiple technology transfers from the program have occuned and several are in progress. Strong emphasis on technology transfer continues with program efforts directed toward the development of commercial technology sources and the demonstration of program technologies to the level required by potential users. NASA programs are cross cutting and closely allied with other major national development efforts to ensure that a broad range of users are provided with new technologies in a timely and cost effective fashion. The NASA program will continue to identify and develop new electric propulsion technologies and invites the participation of innovative members of the community in the coming years. Figure 1. Breadboard pulsed plasma thruster. Figure 2. Conceptual schematic of ACS pulsed plasma thruster for the New Millennium Earth Observer 1 mission.

IEPC-97-003 25 Figure 3. Precision thrust balance for pulsed plasma thruster testing. Figure 4. NSTAR engineering model thruster installed in environmental test fixture for thermal-vacuum testing.

IEPC-97-003 26 Figure 5. High efficiency, miniature cathode/neutralizer for next generation electrostatic thrusters (shown next to NSTAR device). Figure 6. Electric Propulsion Demonstration Module (EPDM) in EM1 testbed.

IEPC-97-003 27 Figure 7. Advanced concentrator testbed developed under joint NASA/NRL program. Figure 8. Plasma plume impacts testing under a NASA/Lockheed-Martin Corp. reimbursible Space Act Agreement.