South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy

Similar documents
West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Oxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Southern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

South Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only

Portsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

MEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES. CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Office for Nuclear Regulation

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2

FORT CUMBERLAND, EASTNEY, PORTSMOUTH PO4 9LD Telephone Facsimile

The UNISDR Global Science & Technology Advisory Group for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR

Title: care.data Pathfinder Stage CCG Recruitment and Selection Process

The 26 th APEC Economic Leaders Meeting

NZFSA Policy on Food Safety Equivalence:

The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group

LSCB Pan-Lancashire LSCB Online Safeguarding Strategy

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

NHS SOUTH NORFOLK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

National Grid s commitments when undertaking works in the UK. Our stakeholder, community and amenity policy

East Anglia TWO and East Anglia ONE North. Summary and Approach to Site Selection

Proposed International Standard on Auditing 315 (Revised) Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

Report OIE Animal Welfare Global Forum Supporting implementation of OIE Standards Paris, France, March 2018

Reflections on progress made at the fifth part of the second session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action

CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Tokyo Protocol. On the Role of Science Centres and Science Museums Worldwide In Support of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

learning progression diagrams

EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT OPERATION CLOSURE

CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2017/18

Gender pay gap reporting tight for time

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

Collaboration Agreement

Both strategies are available on the CCG s website:

AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES MALTA REPORT

Banco de Sabadell, S.A. Policy on communication and contacts with shareholders, institutional investors and proxy advisors

GPC update on co-commissioning of primary care: Important Guidance for CCG member practices and LMCs

November 18, 2011 MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUNDS

Developing the Arts in Ireland. Arts Council Strategic Overview

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Guidance for Industry

Genetic Resources and Intellectual Property: Recent developments under the Convention on Biological Diversity

Management of Fair Share Expenditure Areas

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE REPORT BY THE MUSEUMS THINK TANK

APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap

OWA Floating LiDAR Roadmap Supplementary Guidance Note

MINISTRY OF HEALTH STAGE PROBITY REPORT. 26 July 2016

Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017

Herefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy

responsiveness. Report. Our sole Scope of work period; Activities outside the Statements of future Methodology site level); Newmont; 3.

QUALITY CHARTER FOR THE RESEARCHER S MOBILITY PORTAL

COMMITMENT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR THE RESEARCHER S MOBILITY PORTAL (ERACAREERS: )

Recognised Spectrum Access (RSA) for Receive Only Earth Stations Statement on the making of regulations to introduce RSA in the frequency bands 7850

SUSTAINABLE GROWTH AGREEMENT STIRLING COUNCIL AND SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

Applying Regional Foresight in the BMW Region A Practitioner s Perspective

Requests for Reconsideration of Library Materials 2011 Annual Report

Operational Objectives Outcomes Indicators

the royal society of new zealand: gateway to science and technology strategic priorities

Re: Examination Guideline: Patentability of Inventions involving Computer Programs

Market Access and Environmental Requirements

15 August Office of the Secretary PCAOB 1666 K Street, NW Washington, DC USA

Charter of the Regional Technical Forum Policy Advisory Committee

SHTG primary submission process

ABI Framework for the Management of Gone-Away Customers in the Life and Pensions Market

The Gibraltar Financial Services Commission. Experienced Investor Fund Directors Thematic Review Outcomes

IAASB Main Agenda (March, 2015) Auditing Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations

WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Sixth Session, March 2004

GSA SUMMARY REPORT OF EQUALITY CONSIDERATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EQUALITY IMPACT. PGT Ethics Policy. New: Existing/Reviewed: Revised/Updated:

INNOVATION PROCESS AND ETHICS IN TECHNOLOGY:

Getting the evidence: Using research in policy making

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Counterfeit, Falsified and Substandard Medicines

A Field Guide to Exploring

Protection of Privacy Policy

Bristol Archives Access policy

IET Standards Committee. Governance. IET Standards Committee Remit. IET Standards Committee Constitution

Orkney Electricity Network Reinforcement Stakeholder Consultation Response. August 2014

CBD Request to WIPO on the Interrelation of Access to Genetic Resources and Disclosure Requirements

Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)

The Biological Weapons Convention and dual use life science research

Contribution of civil society to industrial safety and safety culture: lessons from the ECCSSafe European research project

Indigenous and Public Engagement Working Group Revised Recommendations Submitted to the SMR Roadmap Steering Committee August 17, 2018

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Evaluation report. Evaluated point Grade Comments

1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.

Safety related product corrective action

Governing Body Geneva, June 2005

TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL NOTE ON CHANGE MANAGEMENT OF GAMBLING TECHNICAL SYSTEMS AND APPROVAL OF THE SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO CRITICAL COMPONENTS.

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL IMPACT REPORT

ESEA Flexibility. Guidance for Renewal Process. November 13, 2014

INTRODUCTION TO THE RESULTS OF THE IMO PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS IN MARITIME REGULATIONS

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

June Phase 3 Executive Summary Pre-Project Design Review of Candu Energy Inc. Enhanced CANDU 6 Design

Resource Management Act 1991 ( Act ) KAWARAU JET SERVICES HOLDINGS LIMITED. Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL.

Revision of the Public Law Outline

Transcription:

South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy October 2004 South West Renewable Energy Agency Sterling House, Dix s Field, Exeter, EX1 1QA Tel: 01392 229394 Fax: 01392 229395 Email: admin@regensw.co.uk www.regensw.co.uk

The South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy: THE PROTOCOL Background to the Protocol This protocol outlines a series of responsibilities aimed at local planning authorities and wind energy developers for promoting more effective public engagement within the development of wind energy projects. It also outlines a series of reciprocal responsibilities that will need to be met by other stakeholders if the protocol is to work effectively. The protocol and supporting guidance 1 build upon good practice established within the sector as well as other areas of planning. Developing a more consistent approach to public engagement is becoming increasingly important, as many areas of the South West with 1 Supporting guidance available from www.regensw.co.uk i

little or no experience of wind energy, are being faced with increasing numbers of planning applications from wind energy developers with differing approaches to public engagement. As such there is the potential for confusion, misunderstanding and a loss of trust between stakeholders. The protocol is not designed, nor is it expected to influence individual planning decisions. Signing up to the protocol for local planning authorities does not imply support for wind energy. It does however provide both local planning authorities and wind energy developers the opportunity to clearly state their commitment to developing a robust process of engagement that is inclusive, transparent, accessible and accountable, in line with government policy and for the benefit of all stakeholders. Delivering effective public engagement in these terms will help clarify stakeholders expectations of how and when to get involved and will develop their confidence that their views and opinions will be heard. Establishing a set of generic principles for wind energy development provides a basic foundation on which practice around any proposed development can be built. This allows the flexibility necessary for practice to reflect the needs of local situations. For example, the scale of any project will have a significant impact on the extent of any public engagement process undertaken. The protocol has been endorsed by the South West branch of the Local Government Association, the South West branch of the Royal Town Planning Institute and the British Wind Energy Association. Wind energy developers and local planning authorities throughout the South West are invited to sign up in support of the approach outlined by the protocol. Defining Public Engagement For the purposes of this protocol, public engagement refers to the dialogue undertaken by stakeholders during the development of onshore wind energy projects. Stakeholders include the wind energy developer, the local planning authority, local communities and their representatives, statutory consultees and special interest groups. The process may involve discussion of the site, the wind development itself, how local impacts may be mitigated, as well as the provision of benefits to the local area. ii

Principles for Effective Public Engagement In line with government guidance and good practice from many areas of planning, a quality approach to public engagement can be summarised by four key principles: Demonstrating support for the process of public engagement to emphasise the importance placed on public engagement by key stakeholders. Demonstrating an inclusive approach to public engagement to ensure that anyone who is interested has the opportunity to contribute. Demonstrating a transparent and accessible approach to public engagement to ensure that the process will be understandable, open and easy to get involved with. Demonstrating an accountable approach to public engagement to ensure that there is an appropriate flow of information amongst all stakeholders regarding the progress and outcomes of the process. iii

The Protocol This protocol outlines a series of responsibilities that need to be adopted by stakeholders in order to ensure that the principles of effective public engagement are adhered to. References to local benefits should be understood in the light of the comments on the relationship between local benefits and the planning system as outlined within the supporting guidance. In signing up to the protocol, Wind Energy Developers agree to: Prepare and apply a coherent engagement plan in discussion with the local planning authority, which will include: Identification of relevant stakeholders Agreed timescales for turning around key phases of the planning process and responding to information requests Identification of a clear point of contact that will enable a two way flow of information regarding the project Identification of the range of methods appropriate for engaging the relevant stakeholders Clarifying the approach to establishing local and wider benefits Promote at an early stage the scope of the consultation, the outline plans for the development, company policy on local benefits and opportunities for public participation. Identify at an early stage and consult on the potential for local benefits. Ensure any changes in the engagement plan, in particular changes in timescales, are communicated to other stakeholders in good time. Ensure participants are kept up to date on progress and feedback is made available on the results of engagement and how it is being used within the development of the project. iv

In signing up to this protocol, Local Planning Authorities agree to: Prepare and apply clear planning policy and guidance on wind energy in accord with national and regional policy and guidance, and in consultation with neighbouring local planning authorities. Support the evolution of the developer s engagement plan by: Establishing a clear point of contact that will enable a two way flow of information regarding the project Agreeing timescales for turning around key phases of the planning process and responding to information requests (any variation from statutory timescales should be clearly justified) Supporting the identification of key stakeholders and the methods appropriate for engaging them Contributing to discussions on the approach to establishing local and wider benefits Provide support¹ in communicating with key stakeholders and help identifying the full range of community views. Ensure the sourcing of objective information on disputed areas of debate that is reliable and independent. Ensure elected Members are fully up to date on general issues relating to wind energy technology and the implications for planning. Provide a high quality flow of information within the authority on proposed developments, including regular briefings for Members² and other relevant local authority officers. ¹ This may require the involvement of non planning officers within the local authority ² Contact with Members should be in line with the local planning authority s procedures for Member involvement v

In order for these responsibilities to be fully met within individual project developments, other key stakeholders will be expected to: Enter into constructive dialogue with a view to working towards agreed positions on issues up for negotiation. Acknowledge developer and/or local planning authority responses to questions and criticisms raised by other stakeholders. Assist, where possible, in identifying other key stakeholders within the community. Assist, where appropriate, in identifying the full range of local opinion about the development of local benefits. Encourage the identification of points of contact that will facilitate a high quality flow of information within the community. vi

Making the Protocol Work In order for the protocol to be effective in promoting good practice, local planning authorities and wind energy developers will need to embed the commitments that they are signing up to within their own organisational practice. This should involve: Identifying a contact within the organisation responsible for the effective implementation of the protocol Reviewing the organisation s operations with respect to the responsibilities outlined within the protocol Adapting practice where necessary Monitoring any changes to ensure they are embedded within organisational practice The protocol is based on a series of reciprocal responsibilities. Some of the responsibilities outlined could be adopted regardless of the position taken by other stakeholders in an area. However, some responsibilities will only be able to be adopted if both developer and local planning authority sign up to the protocol. The protocol represents a statement of commitment by the signatories. The necessary trust implicit within the shared responsibilities outlined within the protocol will take time to develop through the successful operation of the process. Whilst it is not possible for communities to sign up to the protocol in a strategic sense, it is hoped that the responsibilities outlined for other key stakeholders are taken on board by those concerned within individual projects. It is hoped that the responsibilities of other stakeholders will be respected by those involved in any individual development. The successful operation of the protocol will depend on all parties taking this approach to public engagement seriously. vii

This protocol has been endorsed by the following organisations: To register as a signatory and obtain support in implementing the South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy contact Cheryl Hiles, Planning and Policy Manager at Regen SW, Telephone: 01392 229398 or Email: chiles@regensw.co.uk Core funding for Regen SW comes from the South West of England Regional Development Agency