Si-EPIC Workshop: Silicon Nanophotonics Fabrication Directional Couplers

Similar documents
Si-EPIC Workshop: Silicon Nanophotonics Fabrication Fibre Grating Couplers

Index. Cambridge University Press Silicon Photonics Design Lukas Chrostowski and Michael Hochberg. Index.

CHAPTER 2 POLARIZATION SPLITTER- ROTATOR BASED ON A DOUBLE- ETCHED DIRECTIONAL COUPLER

Waveguide Bragg Gratings and Resonators LUMERICAL SOLUTIONS INC

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Directional coupler (2 Students)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Design and Simulation of Optical Power Splitter By using SOI Material

Multimode Interference Waveguides

Numerical Analysis and Optimization of a Multi-Mode Interference Polarization Beam Splitter

Optical Polarization Filters and Splitters Based on Multimode Interference Structures using Silicon Waveguides

Design, Simulation & Optimization of 2D Photonic Crystal Power Splitter

Polarization Splitting Rotator (PSR) based on Sub-Wavelength Grating (SWG) waveguides

Compact two-mode (de)multiplexer based on symmetric Y-junction and Multimode interference waveguides

Arbitrary Power Splitting Couplers Based on 3x3 Multimode Interference Structures for All-optical Computing

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Ultracompact and low power optical switch based on silicon. photonic crystals

Variable splitting ratio 2 2 MMI couplers using multimode waveguide holograms

GoToWebinar Housekeeping: attendee screen Lumerical Solutions, Inc.

Supplementary information for Stretchable photonic crystal cavity with

Microphotonics Readiness for Commercial CMOS Manufacturing. Marco Romagnoli

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Virtual EM Prototyping: From Microwaves to Optics

Silicon Photonic Device Based on Bragg Grating Waveguide

Title. Author(s)Fujisawa, Takeshi; Koshiba, Masanori. CitationOptics Letters, 31(1): Issue Date Doc URL. Rights. Type.

Polarization Analysis of an Asymmetrically Etched Rib Waveguide Coupler for Sensing Applications

Strong-Field-Enhanced Spectroscopy in Silicon. Nanoparticle Electric and Magnetic Dipole. Resonance near a Metal Surface

Compact hybrid TM-pass polarizer for silicon-on-insulator platform

Lateral leakage of TM-like mode in thin-ridge Silicon-on-Insulator bent waveguides and ring resonators

Waveguiding in PMMA photonic crystals

Silicon photonic devices based on binary blazed gratings

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 29.

Tunable Color Filters Based on Metal-Insulator-Metal Resonators

Horizontal single and multiple slot waveguides: optical transmission at λ = 1550 nm

Plane wave excitation by taper array for optical leaky waveguide antenna

Finite-Difference Time-Domain and Beam Propagation Methods for Maxwell s Equations: Demonstrations with BeamPROP / FullWAVE

Supplementary Figures

Chapter 10 WDM concepts and components

Fiber Optic Communications Communication Systems

Multimode Optical Fiber

Electro-Optic Modulators Workshop

Numerical Analysis and Optimization of a Multi-Mode Interference Based Polarization Beam Splitter

Workshop on Coherent Phenomena in Disordered Optical Systems May Slow-light Propagation in Photonic Nano-Structures

Two bit optical analog-to-digital converter based on photonic crystals

Absorption: in an OF, the loss of Optical power, resulting from conversion of that power into heat.

Supplementary Figure 1. GO thin film thickness characterization. The thickness of the prepared GO thin

Modeling Fabrication Non-Uniformity in Chip-Scale Silicon Photonic Interconnects

Supplementary Figure 1 Reflective and refractive behaviors of light with normal

Hybrid Integration Technology of Silicon Optical Waveguide and Electronic Circuit

UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency with Hybrid Silicon-Plasmonic Travelling-Wave Resonators

ECE 6323 Ridge Waveguide Laser homework

Dual Vivaldi UWB nanoantenna for optical applications

CHIRPED FIBER BRAGG GRATING (CFBG) BY ETCHING TECHNIQUE FOR SIMULTANEOUS TEMPERATURE AND REFRACTIVE INDEX SENSING

Design and fabrication of indium phosphide air-bridge waveguides with MEMS functionality

DBR based passively mode-locked 1.5m semiconductor laser with 9 nm tuning range Moskalenko, V.; Williams, K.A.; Bente, E.A.J.M.

MICRO RING MODULATOR. Dae-hyun Kwon. High-speed circuits and Systems Laboratory

Characterization of Photonic Structures with CST Microwave Studio. CST UGM 2010 Darmstadt

The Effect of Radiation Coupling in Higher Order Fiber Bragg Gratings

z t h l g 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Supporting Information: Achromatic Metalens over 60 nm Bandwidth in the Visible and Metalens with Reverse Chromatic Dispersion


Four wave mixing and parametric amplification in Si-nano waveguides using reverse biased pnjunctions

CHAPTER 2 MICROSTRIP REFLECTARRAY ANTENNA AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

THE PROBLEM of electromagnetic interference between

some aspects of Optical Coherence Tomography

Supplementary Figure 1. Effect of the spacer thickness on the resonance properties of the gold and silver metasurface layers.

Ti: LiNbO 3 Acousto-Optic Tunable Filter (AOTF)

Fully-Etched Grating Coupler with Low Back Reflection

Integrated into Nanowire Waveguides

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.optics] 28 Sep 2005

Fibre Optic Sensors: basic principles and most common applications

THE WIDE USE of optical wavelength division multiplexing

Nano Structure Based Power Splitter Design by Using 2D Photonic Crystals

20dB-enhanced coupling to slot photonic crystal waveguide based on. multimode interference

Projects in microwave theory 2009

Guided Propagation Along the Optical Fiber

The Design of Optical Signal Transforms Based on Planar Waveguides on a Silicon on Insulator Platform

- no emitters/amplifiers available. - complex process - no CMOS-compatible

Deliverable Report. Deliverable No: D2.9 Deliverable Title: OAM waveguide transmission

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS. 4.1 Introduction

MICRORING resonators (MRRs) are often presented as

Design and Analysis of Resonant Leaky-mode Broadband Reflectors

Optical Fiber Technology. Photonic Network By Dr. M H Zaidi

Development of a LFLE Double Pattern Process for TE Mode Photonic Devices. Mycahya Eggleston Advisor: Dr. Stephen Preble

and smart design tools Even though James Clerk Maxwell derived his famous set of equations around the year 1865,

A thin foil optical strain gage based on silicon-on-insulator microresonators

Slot waveguide-based splitters for broadband terahertz radiation

Projects in microwave theory 2017

ALMA MEMO #360 Design of Sideband Separation SIS Mixer for 3 mm Band

Supporting Information: Plasmonic and Silicon Photonic Waveguides

An Example Design using the Analog Photonics Component Library. 3/21/2017 Benjamin Moss

Active Device Utilities and Multi-Level Simulation An Overview

Chapter 1 Silicon Photonic Wire Waveguides: Fundamentals and Applications

DISPERSION MEASUREMENT FOR ON-CHIP MICRORESONATOR. A Thesis. Submitted to the Faculty. Purdue University. Steven Chen. In Partial Fulfillment of the

Properties of Structured Light

Diffractive optical elements for high gain lasers with arbitrary output beam profiles

Design of TE and TM Mode Mach-Zehnder Interferometer based on SOI Technology

Resonator.

Transcription:

Si-EPIC Workshop: Silicon Nanophotonics Fabrication Directional Couplers June 26, 2012 Dr. Lukas Chrostowski

Directional Couplers Eigenmode solver approach

Objectives Model the power coupling in a directional waveguide coupler gap, g Coupler Length, L For g = 200 nm What is the cross-over length of the coupler? Plot coupling vs. length What is the power coupling for L = 10 µm? y W Si x Air, n=1 G W s Si Si02, n=1.45 500nm 220nm 1000nm 3

Fabricated Coupler 4

Two Methods: 1) Coupled-mode theory Find supermode effective indices, using: Lumerical mode solver calculate coupling 2) FDTD propagate a pulse down a coupler and observe power coupling 2D FDTD Effective Index Method 3D FDTD 5

Supermode Effective Index + Analytic Expression Find neff for the two supermodes (symmetric, anti-symmetric) Use coupler expressions to predict response Symmetric Anti-Symmetric Note: original single waveguide mode does not exist! It is only available via a superposition of the above two supermodes. 6

What is a supermode? A supermode is a mode of a super-structure, in this case, two waveguides. It is really an ordinary mode, and propagates just like any other mode: However, we can excite simultaneously 2 supermodes and observe interference (beating) 7

Directional Coupler Theory Cross-over length: L = 1sym 1asym = 0 2(n e 1sym n e 1asym ) Coupling coefficient (field), for a coupler with length Lc: r Pc apple = P 0 = sin 2 Lc L Assuming lossless coupling, the straight-through transmission amplitude coe cient is t = p 1 apple 2. However, if the couplers are lossy, then t 2 =1 apple 2 2, where 2 is a coe cient representing the existence of coupling losses.. 8

2D & 3D FDTD Mode Solver 9

Coupler calculations Question: Plot the mode profiles of the 2 guided modes. What are the effective indices? What is the cross-over coupler length? Cross-over length = distance after which the two super-modes are π shifted, 180º out of phase, i.e., ß1L-ß2L=π e.g. neff1 = 2.404995, neff2 = 2.376921 Coupler cross-over length =1550e-9 / 2 / (neff1-neff2) = 27.606e-06 10

Mode profiles y Position [µm] 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 2 1 0 1 2 x Position [µm] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 y Position [µm] 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 2 1 0 1 2 x Position [µm] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 11

Kappa vs. L apple = r Pc P 0 = sin 2 Lc L. Coupling power ratio 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Cross port (κ 2 ) Through port (t 2 ) 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Coupler Length [µm] 12

Cross-over length vs. Gap 3.5 x 104 10 5 3 10 4 Cross over length [µm] 2.5 2 1.5 1 Cross over length [µm] 10 3 10 2 10 1 0.5 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 10 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 13

Kappa vs. Gap (given L) apple = r Pc P 0 = sin 2 Lc L Field coupling, κ 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 5 µm long coupler 15 µm long coupler Field coupling, κ 10 1 10 2 0.2 0.1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 10 3 5 µm long coupler 15 µm long coupler 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 14

Wavelength dependance Cross-over length 2.5 2.48 Symmetric mode Antisymmetric mode 46 44 Effective Index 2.46 2.44 2.42 2.4 Cross over Length [µm] 42 40 38 36 34 2.38 1.5 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.6 Wavelength [µm] 32 1.5 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.6 Wavelength [µm] 15

Wavelength dependance Kappa 0.16 0.14 0.12 1 µm long coupler 2 µm long coupler 5 µm long coupler Field coupling, κ 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 1.5 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.6 Wavelength [µm] 16

Parasitic coupling 10 5 Coupler length [m] 10 0 10 5 10 db coupling 30 db coupling 50 db coupling -50 db coupling for a 2 µm gap after 1 m! 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Coupler gap [µm] 17

Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Modelling

What is FDTD? Exact numerical calculation of Maxwell s equations in the time domain Simulates pulses of light inside arbitrary geometries and materials Pulses of light contain many optical wavelength (short pulse = wide optical bandwidth, via Fourier Transform) A single pulse simulation provides response of the optical system for multiple wavelengths at once 19

FDTD Manuals http://www.lumerical.com/fdtd_online_help FDTD_getting_started.pdf FDTD_reference_guide.pdf 20

FDTD Tutorial Waveguides

Lumerical MODE Propagator Uses Effective Index Method to collapse a 3D simulation into a 2D simulation Then performs a 2D FDTD simulation 22

Geometry 220x500 WG on oxide centred at y=0 Use Si-Palik 23

Simulation Volume 24

Mesh Settings Automatic mesh generation, with accurate conformal mesh. Auto non-uniform mesh Mesh Accuracy = 1 start with a very fast simulation to verify Mesh refinement conformal 25

3D Simulation Volume Ensure that Si & SiO2 extend through PML. Leave 0.5 to 1 um around the waveguide. 26

MODE Propagator Effective Index Method 27

Mode Source Used to launch light into a waveguide. FDTD calculates the field distribution to match the guided optical mode of the waveguide. Calculation provides effective index of the optical mode. 28

Mode Source 29

Mode Source 3D FDTD Choose geometry, ensuring that mode source surrounds the waveguide. Choose injection axis, i.e. propagation direction Select Mode FDTD will calculate mode profile (with the mesh defined in FDTD simulation parameters). 30

3D Mode Source 3D FDTD Calculate Modes 31

Mode Profile, Effective Index 32

Mode Source PROP Choose geometry, ensuring that mode source surrounds the waveguide. Choose injection axis, i.e. propagation direction Select Mode PROP will calculate mode profile (with the mesh defined in FDTD simulation parameters). Or use Fundamental mode 33

Movie monitor Speed up the movie: 34

Simulation Plot E vs. x in waveguide Plot transmission vs. wavelength at output of waveguide Watch movie 35

Simulation Transmission 36

Movie 37

Directional Couplers FDTD approach

FDTD Model Launch a pulse in one waveguide, model the pulse propagation Observe the power in each waveguide to determine the coupling coefficient study: wavelength dependance, gap dependance... Field profile, movie... 2D: use effective index method 3D: more time consuming, but more accurate includes bend regions 39

Coupling Lx=20.7;? sin(pi/2*l/lx)^2; 40

Effect of the bend region vs. 41

2D FDTD Structures Geometry Material index of refraction found from Mode Solver calculation for the SOI wafer slab, i.e. neff~2.8 500 nm wide waveguides, 100 nm gap Bend regions: 42

2D FDTD Simulation Simulation region, x: PML, y: periodic dx=dy=40nm Mesh override in the two waveguides, dy=20 nm 43

2D FDTD Source Mode source Ensure that E-field is in y direction (i.e. TE-like) 44

2D FDTD Monitors Linear X Power Monitor 45

2D FDTD Results Plot monitor1, monitor2: Intensity vs. x Chose lambda ~ 1550 nm (closest for 5 freq. points is 1535 nm) x=getdata("monitor1","x"); y1=getdata("monitor1","ey"); y2=getdata("monitor2","ey"); plot (x,abs(y1(1:length(x),3))^2, abs(y2(1:length(x),3))^2, "x (um)"," E ^2"); Cross-over length: 20 um 46

2D FDTD Monitors Movie, 2D Power Monitor Movie & 2D Power Monitor of the entire structure Increases the simulation from ~10 s to ~1 minutes. 47

2D Power monitor at 1.535 um What about other wavelengths? 48

2D Power monitor at 1.4 um: at 1.7 um: 49

Narrow band source Coupler is wavelength dependant Narrow-band source: 7 nm wide 1.55 um ~ 193.5 THz 50

Coupler without bend region 51

Coupler without bend region Slight loss due to radiation 52

coupler2d_movie.fsp 2D FDTD Movies Note: large field in the gap 53

coupler2d_3db_v3.fsp Effect of the bend radius Sharp radius introduces losses by coupling the light into higher order modes of the waveguides. These modes have high losses (surface roughness). Increased bend radius reduces the coupler s losses. 54

Directional Coupler 3D FDTD Use a curved region (i.e. 2 nd waveguide comes in gradually ) Allow the input waveguide mode to gradually decompose into the two supermodes. Use silicon (3.48, or dispersive model) 55

3D FDTD Large field component in gap Coupling length ~ 30 um for wavelength = 1.54 um 56

Conclusions 2D FDTD 3D FDTD 2D MODE 3D MODE 2.5D MODE Propagator reasonably fast, good for tutorial example reasonably accurate, fast reasonably fast, reasonably accurate inaccurate slow inaccurate misses bend region effect EIM approximation 57

Directional coupler 200 nm gap, Ridge WG 58

Experimental data 1 0.9 Power Coupling 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 apple 2 =sin [z + z bend ] 2L x t 2 =cos [z + z bend ] 2L x Cross port (κ 2 ) Through port (t 2 ) 2 2 0.2 0.1 L x = 16.8 µm Z bend = 2.3 µm 5 10 15 20 25 Coupler length [µm] 59

3D FDTD simulation Import GDS layout Setup FDTD simulation Vary structure parameter (e.g., length) Simulate each one Determine the through and cross coupling Plot coupling vs. Length Compare with experiments 60

DC_MODEprop.zip scripts to simulate coupler 61

Experiment vs. 3D FDTD 1 0.9 0.8 Power Coupling 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 apple 2 =sin [z + z bend ] 2L x t 2 =cos [z + z bend ] 2L x Through port (t 2 ) Cross port (κ 2 ) 2 2 0.2 0.1 L x = 15.4 µm Z bend = 2.8 µm 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Coupler length [µm] 62

MODE vs. FDTD 1 0.9 0.8 Field coupling, κ 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 κ 2, 7.7 µm long coupler t 2, 7.7 µm long coupler κ 2, 5 µm long coupler, 3D FDTD t 2, 5 µm long coupler, 3D FDTD 0.2 0.1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 63

MODE vs. FDTD 10 1 Power coupling, κ 2, t 2 10 2 10 3 10 4 κ 2, 5 µm long coupler, MODE κ 2, 7.7 µm long coupler, MODE t 2, 5 µm long coupler, MODE t 2, 7.7 µm long coupler, MODE κ 2, 5 µm long coupler, 3D FDTD t 2, 5 µm long coupler, 3D FDTD 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Coupler Gap [nm] 64

FDTD Tutorial Y-Branch Couplers

66

Fabricated Y-Branch splitter / coupler SEM image 6 between branches 67

Fabricated Y-Branch splitter / coupler FDTD can import SEM images; draw in black in the region of the coupler from SEM scale: 0.35 um 9.755 um 44 nm 68

2D FDTD Import structure 69

2D FDTD Simulation Add input & output waveguides to match image data Effective index material (~2.8) Auto mesh 6; PMLs (to absorb scattered light) Mode source, 1550 nm Monitors: Linear Y ( L, R ) and 2D Power Monitors 70

2D FDTD Results at 1535 nm: L=getdata("monitorL","Px"); R=getdata("monitorR","Px"); y=getdata("monitorl","y"); plot(y,l(1:length(y),3),r(1:length(y),3),"position, y","power" ); legend("left side","right side"); Almost a 50-50% splitter. 71

FDTD Model Ideal layout Layout: 500 nm wide waveguides Each waveguide is rotated by 3 Separation of output waveguides is 500 nm In, Out1, Out2: Point Power Monitors, 200 frequency points. 72

Y-Branch Output Spectrum out1=pinch(getdata("out1","px"));out2=pinch(getdata("out2","px")); in=pinch(getdata("in","px")); f=getdata("out1","f"); plot(c/f,out1/in,out2/in,"wavelength","power" ); legend("output: Top","Output: Bottom"); 20 nm Mesh 10 nm Mesh 73

Y-Branch Movie 74

Y-Branch Combiner Reverse operation of a 50%-50% splitter In-phase sources (Gaussian, beam waist of 0.3 µm) constructive interference 180º out-of-phase sources (Gaussian, beam waist of 0.3 µm) destructive interference where does the power go? 75