Brian J. Love Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara

Similar documents
Could a Patent Term Reduction Solve the Software Patent Problem? Brian J.

Patent Insurance/Collective Approaches to Managing Patent Risk

Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

Does the US Patent System Need a Patent Small Claims Proceeding?

Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study

Invest in Growth How LOT Network Addresses the PAE Problem. Ken Seddon CEO, LOT Network September 8, 2017

Software Patents & Functional Claiming

2012 NPE Activity Report

FTC Approves Nielsen-Arbitron Transaction with Licensing and Divestiture Remedies

Knowledge-Based Capital and the Patent Marketplace. Professor Colleen Chien

Analyzing the Role of Non-Practicing Entities in the Patent System

practicing entity patent troll Patent Assertion and U. S. Innovation Government Accountability Office

FTC Panel on Markets for IP and technology

The Private Costs of Patent Litigation. James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer

US Patent Litigation Trends in Cloud Computing IPlytics GmbH

Before the Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC COMMENTS OF COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Opinion Poll. Illinois Small Business Owners Support Legislation Reforming Patent System. April 29, 2014

Trolls or Toll-Takers: Do Intellectual Property Non-practicing Entities Add Value to Society?

Unpacking Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs)

Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage

Insight: Litigation Trends (Top 10 Global Manufacturers)

Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System

Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation?

Patent Litigation Weekly: Data Shows That Troll Problem Persists

DO BAD PATENTS BLOCK COMPETITION OR HARM INNOVATION?

Learning from Past Mistakes The US Patent System and International Trade Agreements

Make the Patent Polluters Pay: Using Pigovian Fees to Curb Patent Abuse

Raising the Stakes in Patent Cases

Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012

U.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface. Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014

The America Invents Act: Policy Rationales. Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013

Patent Trolls: A Drain on Innovation?

DOJ and FTC Hold Workshop on PAEs

DEFENSIVE PUBLICATION IN FRANCE

Patent Assertion in the United States and Europe: Contrasting the Recent European Commission s PAE Study with the Federal Trade Commission s PAE Study

A conversation on Patent Quality

Enterprise Patent Portfolio Commercialization: Trends and Opportunities

Patent Assertion and Startup Innovation

Lisa A. Dolak Senior Vice President and University Secretary Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law

小心站台空隙. Don Merino Vice President and General Manager, Asia Licensing Sales. December 2, 2011

5 Ways To Ramp Up Your Patent Portfolio

DO NPEs MATTER? NON-PRACTICING ENTITIES AND PATENT LITIGATION OUTCOMES. Michael J. Mazzeo, Jonathan H. Ashtor & Samantha Zyontz

Identifying Patent Monetization Entities

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PATENT TROLL HYPOTHESIS: EVIDENCE FROM PUBLICLY-TRADED FIRMS

From the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation

Brian J. Love. 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA (408) Bergin Hall B109

To the members of the IEEE Standards Association Standards Board:

Bas de Blank. Representative Engagements. Partner Silicon Valley T E

Patent Demands and Initial Public Offerings

Mind the Gap: Economic Costs and Innovation Perils in the Space Between Patent and Competition Law. By George Addy and Erika Douglas

Supreme Court of the United States

DO NPEs MATTER?: NON-PRACTICING ENTITIES AND PATENT LITIGATION OUTCOMES. Michael J. Mazzeo Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

The Patent Litigation Explosion

Insights: Litigation Trends (Top 10 Global Suppliers)

Swedish Patent Litigation Survey of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

Lisa A. Dolak. Senior VP and University Secretary; Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law. Publications

INTER PARTES REVIEW AS A SHIELD FOR TECHNOLOGY PURCHASERS: A RESPONSE TO GAIA BERNSTEIN S THE RISE OF THE END-USER IN PATENT LITIGATION

China: Patent LAW. Randall Rader Tsinghua University Professor and Advisory Board Chair

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LITIGATION

Does Innovation Mean Patent Licensing Demands?

Patent Aggregation: Models, Harms, and the Limited Role of Antitrust

THE TRESPASS FALLACY IN THE SOFTWARE PATENT DEBATE. Ryan T. Holte *

Slide 25 Advantages and disadvantages of patenting

Managing IP Assets Throughout the. Patent Lifecycle

When Alexander Poltorak founded General Patent Corp., which

Protect Your Innovation and Maximize Your Investment Return in Automotive Electronics

The Need To Reform The US Patent System. A Story of Unfair Invalidation for Patents Under Alice 101

Patents and the Transfer of Knowledge

Infringement and Enforcement Panel How can you identify infringement and enforce your rights?

BIGGER AND BETTER PATENTEXAMINER STATISTICS

Patent Related Trends in the Automotive Industry

TESTIMONY OF CHUCK FISH VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF PATENT COUNSEL TIME WARNER. BEFORE THE

elearning Patents: An institutional perspective

COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW SIDEBAR VOL. 114 MAY 15, 2014 PAGES ON MASS PATENT AGGREGATORS. David L. Schwartz*

Key Strategies for Your IP Portfolio

Google reveal. their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy. Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google

Understanding and Dealing with Patent Trolls

Joinder under the AIA: Shifting Non-Practicing Entity Patent Assertions away from Small Businesses

The Defensive Patent Playbook

WHAT S WRONG WITH THE ARGUMENTS FOR PATENT REFORM

Market-Derived Patent Data: What Data is Important and How Does It Impact Value?

The Who Owns What Problem in Patent Law

Patent Trolls: How To Avoid Being Gobbled Up

Litigators for Innovators

Hamilton Loeb. Washington, D.C. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education. Partner, Litigation Department

Privateers & PAEs: Economic Harms to Competition and Innovation

EXPLORING THE INTERNET OF THINGS: GAINING INSIGHTS FROM PATENT ANALYTICS

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Patents in an Environment of Global Collaboration

Is There a Patent Troll Problem in the U.K.?

The Defensive Patent License

COMMENTS OF FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE AND THE NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Patent Trolling Why Bio & Pharmaceuticals Are at Risk

Settlement of Pharma Disputes and Competition Law in Korea

Automated Generation of Timestamped Patent Abstracts at Scale to Outsmart Patent-Trolls

5/30/2018. Prof. Steven S. Saliterman Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Software Patents: Solutions for Developers Deb Nicholson Linuxcon Europe

Transcription:

Patent Assertion Entities Brian J. Love Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara University blove@scu.edu @BrianJLove California Assembly Select Committee on High Technology: Informational Hearing on Patent Assertion Entities October 30, 2013 1

What is a Patent Assertion Entity? An entity that uses patents primarily to obtain license fees rather than to support the development or transfer of technology (F.T.C.; Chien, From Arms Race to Marketplace) Patents don t support its business. Patents are its business. 2

What is a Patent Assertion Entity? Non-Practicing Entities NPEs Universities Early Stage Start-ups Tech Co. s Patent- Licensing Subsidiaries PAEs Acquirer Monetizers Inventor Monetizers 3

How can PAEs be problematic? PAEs are uniquely able to: Reduce the cost of patent assertion Increase the cost of defense And thus: Extract large settlements Even when their claims are extremely weak Majority of NPE/PAE suits settle for < cost of defense (Chien, Dec. 2012 DOJ/FTC Workshop on PAEs; RPX survey of 78 tech companies involved in 900 NPE/PAE suits) 4

Typical Litigation Plaintiff Defendant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 5

Typical Litigation Settlement Amount Expected Damages Cost of Defense 6

Typical Litigation Settlement Amount Expected Damages Cost of Defense 7

Typical Litigation Settlement Amount Expected Damages Cost of Defense 8

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee Accused Infringer Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 9

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 10

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 11

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 12

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 13

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 14

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 15

Typical Patent Litigation Patentee & Accused Infringer Accused Infringer & Counterclaimant Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 16

Typical PAE Litigation P.A.E. Patentee Accused Infringer Expected Winnings Litigation Costs 17

P.A.E. Patentee Typical PAE Litigation Accused Infringer Expected Winnings Litigation Costs Nuisance Value 18

Typical PAE Litigation Expected Damages Settlement Amount Cost of Defense 19

Typical PAE Litigation Expected Damages Settlement Amount Cost of Defense 20

Typical PAE Litigation Expected Damages Settlement Amount Cost of Defense 21

Mass Patent Assertion Tech Companies PAEs Suits per litigated patent 1.5 4.1 Accused infringers per litigated patent 2.9 16.1 Source: Love 22

Mass Patent Assertion Overall Rank Tech Co # NPE Suits Defended (2009-June 2013) 1 Apple 171 2 HP 137 10 Google 103 21 Cisco 59 Source: Patent Freedom, https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/pursued/ 23

Mass Patent Assertion Overall Rank Tech Co # NPE Suits Defended (2009-June 2013) 1 Apple 171 2 HP 137 10 Google 103 11 Amazon.com 102 20 Best Buy 60 21 Cisco 59 24 Wal-Mart 53 Source: Patent Freedom, https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/pursued/ 24

Mass Patent Assertion Patent Act permits suit of... More entities to sue Manufacturer Retailers Less sophisticated, Less tech knowledge End-Users 25

Mass Patent Assertion PAE # Accused Infringers # Law Suits # Patents Tech at Issue GeoTag 435 115 1 Store locator maps on webpages ArrivalStar / Melvino 326 211 16 Using GPS to track vehicles PJC Logistics 281 44 1 Lodsys 106 36 4 Purchasing via a mobile app Source: Patent Freedom (numbers current only as of Feb. 2013) 26

Mass Patent Assertion PAE # Accused Infringers # Law Suits # Patents Tech at Issue GeoTag 435 115 1 Store locator maps on webpages ArrivalStar / Melvino 326 211 16 Using GPS to track vehicles PJC Logistics 281 44 1 Lodsys 106 36 4 Purchasing via a mobile app Source: Patent Freedom (numbers current only as of Feb. 2013) 27

Mass Patent Assertion PAE # Accused Infringers # Law Suits # Patents Tech at Issue GeoTag 435 115 1 Store locator maps on webpages ArrivalStar / Melvino 326 211 16 Using GPS to track vehicles PJC Logistics 281 44 1 Lodsys 106 36 4 Purchasing via a mobile app Source: Patent Freedom (numbers current only as of Feb. 2013) 28

Most PAE targets are: Mass Patent Assertion - Small businesses: 55% make < $10 million in annual revenue (Chien, Startups and Patent Trolls) 82% make < $100 million (Bessen & Meurer; compare with Chien finding 66%) - Not tech companies In 2011 and 2012 alone, PAEs sued 929 retailers 616 transport/transit companies 524 financial services providers (Patent Freedom) 29

Mass Patent Assertion Median cost to defend a patent suit: $650,000 (AIPLA: among suits with < $1M at stake) $560,000 (Bessen & Meurer: survey of 82 NPE/PAE targets in >1100 suits) Not to mention indirect, non-economic costs: Distraction of executives and engineers Delays in hiring and product launches/updates Total cost might be 2-3 times higher than legal bills (Bessen & Meurer) 30

Mass Patent Assertion For every lawsuit there appear to be many more licensing demands... Estimated at 25-50 letters per PAE suit filed (Chien, Dec. 2012 DOJ/FTC Workshop on PAEs) Some send 500 letters per suit or more Innovatio sent 14,000 letters, filed 26 cases (Cisco) E-Data sent as many as 75,000 letters (Meurer) 31

Leveraging Weak Claims PAE patents are more likely to be narrow incremental improvements: Tech Co Patent Suits PAE Patent Suits % High-Tech 37% 75-80% % Software 22% 62-65% Sources: Love; Bessen & Meurer 32

Leveraging Weak Claims PAE patents are more likely to be narrow incremental improvements: 5 patents (Ouellette) 250,000 patents (RPX) 33

Leveraging Weak Claims PAE patents are more likely to have been erroneously-issued by the PTO: % ending in judgment of invalidity Tech Co Patent Suits PAE Patent Suits ~19% 28% Sources: Kesan & Ball; Risch 34

Leveraging Weak Claims PAEs are more likely to exaggerate the breadth of their patent rights: % found not infringed in court Adjudicated Tech Co Patents Adjudicated PAE Patents 29% 56% Sources: Love 35

Leveraging Weak Claims Overall win rate for NPEs/PAEs? 9% (Allison, et al.) 14% (Feldman, et al.) 36

Leveraging Weak Claims Even so... - Vast majority of NPE/PAE cases settle 88% (Allison et al.) 76% (Feldman, et al.) - Sanctions are extremely rare Courts award fees in < 2% of patent adjudications (Chien, Reforming Software Patents) 37

Bottom Line: Many PAEs... File large number of suits (16+ accused per PAE patent) Often against unsophisticated targets (55% are small businesses) That face extreme expense to fight (~$600,000 median) Even when victory is highly likely (~90% of the time) Thus, usually settle for < defense costs (~80% settle) 38

Sources Allison, et al., Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents, 158 U. PA. L. REV. 1 (2009) Bessen & Meurer, The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes, 99 CORNELL L. REV. (forthcoming) Chien, From Arms Race to Marketplace: The Complex Patent Ecosystem and Its Implications for the Patent System, 62 HASTINGS L.J. 297 (2010) Chien, Reforming Software Patents, 50 HOUS. L. REV. 323 (2012) Chien, Startups and Patent Trolls, STAN. TECH. L. REV. (forthcoming) Feldman, et al., The AIA 500 Expanded: The Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, U.C.L.A. J.L. & TECH (forthcoming) Kesan & Ball, How Are Patent Cases Resolved? An Empirical Examination of the Adjudication and Settlement of Patent Disputes, 84 WASH. U. L. REV. 237 (2006) Love, An Empirical Study of Patent Litigation Timing: Could a Patent Term Reduction Decimate Trolls Without Harming Innovators?, 161 U. PA. L. REV. 1309 (2013) Love & Yoon, Expanding Patent Law s Customer Suit Exception, 93 B.U. L. REV. 1605 (2013) Meurer, Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation, 44 B.C. L. REV. 509 (2003) Patent Freedom: https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/industry/; https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/pursued/ Risch, Patent Troll Myths, 42 SETON HALL L. REV. 457 (2012) RPX, http://www.rpxcorp.com/key-patent-market-trends 39