6 th Meeting of Representatives of Laboratories Contributing to TAI BIPM, 31 March 2004 Timing-oriented Processing of Geodetic GPS Data using a Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Approach Patrizia TAVELLA, Diego ORGIAZZI Istituto Elettrotecnico Nazionale G. Ferraris Turin, Italy
Outlin The Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Geodetic Approach Autonomous stand-alone positioning IGS products (precise satellite coordinates and satellite clock) PreliminaryTiming-oriented Performance of PPP Software implementation provided by the Geodetic Survey Division (GSD) of Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Analysis of differential delay of two geodetic GPS receivers Time transfer assessment over European link between IEN and PTB Open Issues Better understanding of clock model and daily batch handling
The Precise Point Positioning (PPP Geodetic Approac Post-processing approach using un-differenced dual frequency pseudorange and carrier phase observations coming from a single geodetic GPS receiver together with the high-quality GPS products provided by the IGS (International GPS Service) in near real time Precise Satellites Coordinates Satellite Clock Estimates Relying on both the IGS products and proper algorithms, the PPP eliminates the need to acquire simultaneous observations from a reference station or a network of tracking stations Alternative to the differential positioning (reference station(s) with known position) Stand-alone alone position of a single geodetic GPS receiver can be autonomously estimated with cm precision, even if the receiver is not part of a network of stations (such as, the world wide distributed IGS network) Receiver clock offset estimates with sub-nsprecision (static mode)
PPP algorithm software implementation kindly provided by the Geodetic Survey Division (GSD) of Preliminary Timing-oriented Performance of PP (NRCan) Overlapping Allan deviation 1.00E-12 1.00E-13 1.00E-14 1.00E-15 Via TAI P3 Via PPP Analysis of the differential delay o two geodetic GPS receivers operated by IEN Ashtech Z-12T Javad Legacy Using the hourly data provided by the IEN local measurements system A constant bias has been removed 1.00E-16 1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07 Averaging time, t, seconds Receivers s (ns) s y (t) @ t = 1 day Better stability performance Better stability performance thanks to the use of dual-frequency carrier phase measurements in the PPP algorithm, as well as the availability of high-quality GPS data as provided by IGS 3SN wrt TTS-2 via GPS CV Ashtech Javad via P3 Ashtech Javad via PPP 1.6 0.8 0.3 2.01 10-14 1.52 10-14 @ 8.00 10-15
Analysis of the time transfer feasibility over an European link between IEN (Turin, Italy) PTB (Braunschweig, Germany) Preliminary Timing-oriented Performance of PP 80.0 70.0 60.0 Availability of both TWSTFT and GPS CV data for comparison IGS Clock products also available since January 2004 ns 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 1.00E-13 CV TW 0:00h UTC PPP Discontinuous availability of TW measurements at 00h UTC 0.0 53004 53009 53014 53019 53024 53029 53034 53039 53044 53049 53054 53059 53064 5306 MJD GPS CV + 30ns TWSTFT + 20ns BIPM Circular T PPP + calibration offset + 10ns TW 14:14h UTC Overlapping Allan deviation 1.00E-14 The bias affecting the PPP link has been estimated with respect to the recen calibrated TWSTFT link 1.00E-15 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07 Averaging time,?(s) Stability performance better Stability performance better than othe time transfer methods (TWSTFT and GPS CV)
Conclusion Even if a single geodetic GPS receiver is not part of a network of stations (such as, the world wide distributed IGS network), the PPP post-processing approach allows Station coordinates estimates with centimetre precision (static mode) Receiver clock offset estimates with sub-nsprecision (static mode) Thanks to the use of dual-frequency carrier phase measurements as well as to the availability of high-quality GPS data as provided by IGS, the PPP approach seems to be very promising also for timing purposes as showed by preliminary results Low noise estimate of differential delay between geodetic GPS receivers Time transfer capability with stability performance comparable with other methods (TWSTFT and GPS CV) Open issues and future works Investigation of day boundaries gaps in PPP estimates Pre-processing of PPP estimates with the aim to filter out any outliers