COLLECTIVE PROTECTION

Similar documents
NBC CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE

Collective Protection Technology Readiness Evaluation (COLPRO TRE)

Integrated Transition Solutions

INFORMATION SYSTEMS. 8 September Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry

U.S. ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND

Follow the Yellow Brick Road

The Army s Future Tactical UAS Technology Demonstrator Program

Dedicated Technology Transition Programs Accelerate Technology Adoption. Brad Pantuck

Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry September 2011

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Advanced Technology Support Program IV (ATSP4) Organizational Perspective and Technical Requirements

Lockheed Martin. An Overview of Partnering with Small Businesses

Partnering with Industry

Fiscal Year 2008 President s Budget Request for DoD Science & Technology

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Army Science & Technology

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

Standardization of Nerve Agent Protection Testing: A Successful Transition and Standardization Story

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

Aberdeen Proving Ground Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry

Management of Toxic Materials in DoD: The Emerging Contaminants Program

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

Modeling & Simulation Roadmap for JSTO-CBD IS CAPO

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

ECBC Update for Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

2018 Research Campaign Descriptions Additional Information Can Be Found at

Future of New Capabilities

The Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport

Defense Innovation Day Unmanned Systems

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. List of Acronyms...4. Executive Summary Introduction and Background...7. Vision and Mission...10

Information Warfare Research Project

Distribution STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. R A P I D I N N O V A T I O N F U N D 1

Explosive Ordnance Disposal/ Low-Intensity Conflict. Improvised Explosive Device Defeat

Army Research Laboratory -Orlando TSIS 2017

Other Transaction Agreements. Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum

Ms. Lisa Sanders Director

S&T Stakeholders Conference

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Other Transactions (OTs) for Prototypes and the Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP) Consortium OT

Engineered Resilient Systems NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 29, 2014

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #102

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

Non-Lethal Weapons Program

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Technology Roadmapping. Lesson 3

Michael Coughenour Lockheed Martin Rotary & Mission Systems (RMS) System Engineering Technologist

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE S: Microelectronics Technology Development and Support (DMEA) FY 2013 OCO

RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Ms. Lisa Sanders Director, Science & Technology SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Engagements and Opportunities

JOCOTAS. Strategic Alliances: Government & Industry. Amy Soo Lagoon. JOCOTAS Chairman, Shelter Technology. Laura Biszko. Engineer

CHAPTER 36 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) NAVPERS B CH-62

Establishment of a Center for Defense Robotics

Electrical Products Group Conference

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Venture Capital Technology Panel (VCRAC) Presentation to John Young Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition)

Implementation of Corrosion Control Technologies within the U.S. Department of Defense

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

Trends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy

Science & Technology for the Objective Force

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

Department of Defense Independent Research & Development (IR&D) and the Defense Innovation Marketplace

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

DoD Engineering and Better Buying Power 3.0

Impact of Technology on Future Defense. F. L. Fernandez

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

Demonstration System Development for Advanced Shipboard Desalination FNC

CHAPTER 59 OPERATIONS SPECIALIST (OS) NAVPERS H CH-76

Engineering Autonomy

DARPA: Funding Advanced Research for the Department of Defense

Department of Energy Technology Readiness Assessments Process Guide and Training Plan

The DoD Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) Program. Derrick Hinton Principal Deputy Director Test Resource Management Center

Dr. Tony Tether Director

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

DoD Research and Engineering

Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Capability Assessment Event (CAE)

Realizing Fleet Savings Through SBIR/STTR 23 August 2017

Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO) Overview

The Value of Simulators for CBRN Reconnaissance Vehicle Training whitepaper

OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET)

Chemical-Biological Defense S&T For Homeland Security

Open Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges

Technology Insertion: A Way Ahead

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space

TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: INCREASING THE VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2002

David N Ford, Ph.D.,P.E. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University. Military Acquisition. Research Project Descriptions

NAVY OPERATING CONCEPT (CURRENT & FUTURE READINESS)

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

THE EM LEAD LABORATORY: PROVIDING THE RESOURCES AND FRAMEWORK FOR COMPLEXWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP-STEWARDSHIP ACTIVITIES

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Transformative Aeronautics Concepts Program Overview and CAS Project Details

Fiscal Year 2009 President s Budget Request for Science & Technology And Research & Engineering. Principal Deputy Defense Research and Engineering

Introduction to SECURE Program

The Imperative for Change

TACOM-LCMC/RDECOM-ECBC

Autonomy Test & Evaluation Verification & Validation (ATEVV) Challenge Area

Transcription:

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense Joint Science and Technology Office COLLECTIVE PROTECTION April 4, 2007 Advanced Planning Brief to Industry STANLEY A. ENATSKY, PE JPM COLLECTIVE PROTECTION Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense stanley.enatsky@navy.mil DR. CHARLES BASS, PHD CAPO FOR PROTECTION Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense charles.bass@dtra.mil Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited 1

Outline Program Overview Science and Technology and Warfighter Needs Technical Challenges Acquisition Strategy/ Funding/ Schedule Upcoming Business Opportunities Contacts 2

Science & Technology (S&T) Overview Overall Objective: Develop S&T that will protect the warfighter from the full range of Chemical and Biological Agents by supporting acquisition programs of record and providing the material developer with innovative and revolutionary alternatives that meet the user s objectives. Focus on: Reduce the Power, Weight, Volume and Operations and Maintenance Costs Simplify and Increase the Through-put Rate for Safe Ingress/Egress Enhancing Liquid and Solid Aerosol Protection Improving Toxic Industrial Chemicals/Toxic Industrial Materials Protection 3

What is Revolutionary? $135 Billion 1 Apollo program makes 6 landings on the moon and stimulates development of many spin-off technologies including integrated circuits and fuel cells. Journey has not been repeated in over 34 years. 1. Adjusted to 2006 dollars Automatic rifle designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov and introduced in 1947 is revered for its simplicity and reliability. Produced worldwide and used by 55 national armies, it has become a cultural icon. 4

Mission: Program Overview In Support of the National Military Strategy, Research, Develop, Procure, Field and Dispose of Collective Protection Equipment and Systems that Protect Personnel and Equipment Within Controlled Boundaries From Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Toxic Industrial Contamination Collective Protection Systems: Protection by Creating Toxic Free Areas that Allow Occupants to Operate Safely at Near-normal Levels Independent of Surrounding Hazardous Environments Stand- Alone or Sub-systems that Integrate into Various Platforms: Fixed Assets (Buildings) Mobile Assets (Aircraft, Ships, Vehicles) Transportable Assets (Hard & Soft Shelters) 5

Program Overview (Cont d) Technology Readiness Evaluations FY05-07 Technology Areas of Interest Chemical Biological Barrier Materials & Quick-Erect Structures Support Equipment for Collective Protection Whole CP Systems Air Purification Industry Interest: 66 Technical White Papers Mature Technologies: 40 Detailed Briefings Industrial Opportunities: 10 New Industries Government Tested: 34 Technologies Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) Assigned Testing Results Promulgated to Participating Industry Partners TRL Feedback to Industry (Less Air Purification) Completed April 2006 TRL for Air purification 2QFY07 6

S&T Needs Near Term (FY08 FY10) Objectives Regenerative and/or Reactive Filtration Expedient Encapsulation Improved Closures and Barrier Materials Collective Protection Engineering Design Model Standardized Test and Evaluation (T&E) Methodologies Mid Term ( FY10 FY13) Objectives Novel Systems Approaches Simplified Ingress/Egress Systems Advanced Filtration Technologies Far Term ( FY14 & Beyond) Objectives Intelligent Collective Protection Shelters 7

Program Warfighter Needs Enhanced Air Purification Reduced Air Flow Resistance in Single-pass Filter Systems Regenerative or Filter Less Technologies to Remove or Destroy Hazards Logistical Enhancements (Weight, Cube, Power, Consumables) Mobile Platform Protection Egress From Mobile Platforms Without Compromising Protection Saturation/Performance Indicator for Air Purification System Expeditionary Collective Protection Shelter Systems that Maintain a Toxic Free Area with Reduced Logistical Burden Optimized Ingress/Egress of Personnel and Materials without Compromising Protection 8

S&T Technical Challenges Air Purification Tailorable Adsorbents for Low-molecular Weight Chemical Vapors Energy Efficient Reactive/Regenerative Processes Highly-efficient, Low-resistance Sub-micron Particulate Removal Residual Life Indicators Textile and Material Science Ultra-thin, High-strength, and Flexible/Tactile Barrier Materials Stable, Selectively Reactive, Self-detoxifying Materials Intelligent (Switchable), Controlled Permeable Materials Strippable and Self-detoxifying Barrier Coatings Systems Science Rapid Ingress/Egress Technologies Dual-use Technologies Novel Approaches To Collective Protection 9

Program Technical Challenges Integration with Platforms, e.g., Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, Future Combat System, Littoral Combat Ship Non-intrusive Integration Designing for Modularity and Component Flexibility Minimize Footprint Burden to Platforms Protect Against Toxic Industrial Chemicals / Toxic Industrial Materials New Threat Agents Maintain Overpressure for Ingress/Egress in Vehicles ColPro for Aircraft Reducing / Eliminating Consumables Reducing Consumable Costs 10

S&T Capability Strategy Overall: Support Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection (JECP) Program: Execute Near Term Transitions for Insertion into Increment 2 Continue to Invest in Revolutionary Technologies; Exploit Shortterm Success to Improve JECP Explore Far-term Novel Concepts that Support a Systems-ofsystems Approach Test and Evaluation: Develop Methodologies to Support Transition of New Technologies and Field JECP 11

Program Acquisition Strategy Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection Full and Open Competition for a Systems Integration Team to Deliver Production-ready Test Articles and Final Production Units Reduced Risk Through Early Technology Demonstrations and Limited Operational Experiments Incremental Fielding Aligned with Maturity of Technologies Major Defense Acquisition Programs Organize CP Office Along MDAP Lines (i.e., mobile, ships, fixed site) Assist Programs with CP Designs and Integration Strategies Deliver CBDP Furnished Systems, When Required Support System Integration and Platform Test Strategies 12

Program Acquisition Strategy (Cont d) Mobile Collective Protection Systems (MCPS) M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank Light Armored Vehicle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle Future Combat System Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles Joint Light Tactical Vehicle 13

Program Acquisition Strategy (Cont d) Shipboard Collective Protection (Ship-CPS) Littoral Combat Ship Guided Missile Destroyer/Cruiser Amphibious Assault Ship Replacement Amphibious Transport Dock Joint Maritime Assault Connector Fixed Collective Protection System (FCPS) JPM Guardian On-Demand CP System MILCON Major Commands Department of State Department of Homeland Security 14

S&T Program Schedule/Transition FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 DoD Funded Programs Proposed Transition T&E Methodologies CatOx/Regen Filtratrion Expedient Encapsulation ColPro Barrier and Seal Enhancements Advanced Air Purification Model Simplified Ingress/Egress 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2009 LEGEND: Technology Transition Agreement (TTA) Transition 15

S&T Funding ($M) YEAR/ RTDE FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 TOTAL FY08-13 6.2 23.0 28.4 29.3 28.1 24.9 22.8 156.5 6.3 2.9 2.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 13.6 TOTAL BUDGET 25.9 31.3 31.2 30.0 26.9 24.7 170.1 Total Protection S&T Funds (IP, CP, and Decon for FY09 and beyond) 16

Program Funding & Schedule FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 JECP Increment I RDT&E IOT&E Production FY12 FY13 $M FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Collective Protection FY07- FY13 6.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 3.9 13.9 11.4 2.7 0 0 0 31.9 PROC 0 0 0 6.1 7.9 5.1 4.8 23.9 17

S&T Upcoming Business Opportunities OPPORTUNITY CB Defense Physical Science and Technology (annual) BAA For FY2009 New Start Projects CB Defense Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) http://www.acq.osd.mil/sadbu/sbir/homepg.htm Chem-Bio Defense Initiative Fund (CBDIF) BAA TIME- FRAME December Mid-Nov December 18

Program Upcoming Business Opportunities PROGRAM DESCRIPTION YEAR JECP Initial increment: RFP for Prime Contractor Draft RFP Release March 2007 3QFY07 19

S&T Points of Contact Capability Area Project Officer for Protection (CAPO) Dr. Charles Bass, PhD (703) 767-3371 charles.bass@dtra.mil Collective Protection Thrust Area Manager Mr. William Buechter (703) 767-3104 william.buechter@dtra.mil 20

Program Points of Contact Joint Project Manager-Collective Protection Mr. Stanley A. Enatsky, P.E. (202) 781-3741 stanley.enatsky@navy.mil stan.enatsky@jpeocbd.osd.mil Deputy Joint Project Manager-Collective Protection Mr. Mike Abaie (540) 653-2719 michael.abaie@navy.mil 21

Program Product Director Points of Contact Mobile Collective Protection Systems Mr. Jorge Christian (410) 436-5512 jorge.christian@us.army.mil Shipboard Collective Protection Systems Mr. Richard Chip Warder (540) 653-0411 richard.warder@navy.mil Fixed Collective Protection Systems Mr. Walt Dzula (540) 653-5266 walter.dzula@navy.mil 22