A/AC.105/C.1/2011/CRP.4

Similar documents
Prepared by the Working Group on the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space

A/AC.105/C.1/2006/NPS/CRP.7 16 February 2006

Safety recommendations for nuclear power source applications in outer space

Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions

A/AC.105/C.1/2014/CRP.13

ENGAGING SPACE TOOLS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON EARTH: CONTRIBUTION OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS TO THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY J8-TM INFORMATION SHEET. Technical Meeting on. Safety Culture Oversight and Assessment

A/AC.105/C.1/2016/CRP.21

International Efforts for Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBM) and Japan s Contribution

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/C.1/L.335/Add.4. Draft report

The Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development *

Report on the linkage modalities and the rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

Future of the Draft International Code of Conduct as the Linchpin of the Space Security and Safety

Marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Legal and policy framework

Science and technology for development

Annotations to the provisional agenda INTRODUCTION

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGIES (DECISION 13/CP.1) Submissions by Parties

4 T H CONFERENCE ON SPACE SCIENCE A N D T E C H N O L O G Y F O R

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Rolling workplan of the Technology Executive Committee for

Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines Update

Statement by. H.E. Ina H. Krisnamurthi. Ambassador / Deputy Permanent Representative. of the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Indonesia

THE INTERNATIONAL COSPAS-SARSAT PROGRAMME AGREEMENT

Initial draft of the technology framework. Contents. Informal document by the Chair

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

Report of the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee Activities on IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines & Supporting Document

DRAFT TEXT on. SBI 49 agenda item 14(a) Scope of and modalities for the periodic assessment referred to in paragraph 69 of decision 1/CP.

Reflections on progress made at the fifth part of the second session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

14 February 2011 Japan

The creation of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Expert Group (EPREG) which held its second meeting last month.

The Republic of Korea s Submission on the Scope and Modalities for the Periodic Assessment of the Technology Mechanism.

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Economic and Social Council

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

Standards in. International Trade & Nuclear Safety. The Role of IAEA

Presentation to the UN COPUOS STSC LTSSA Workshop. ISO Space Standards. 14 February 2013

Capacity Building for Promoting Gender Equality in Africa and West Asia Countries

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

PLANNING AND ORGANIZATION FOR THE THIRD HIGH-LEVEL MEETING ON TRANSPORT, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT

IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT NON-NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CO-OPERATION

CBD Request to WIPO on the Interrelation of Access to Genetic Resources and Disclosure Requirements

E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/TDD/2017/IG.1/6 31 January 2017 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ARABIC

ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS ADDRESS BY AMBASSADOR AHMET ÜZÜMCÜ DIRECTOR-GENERAL

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Nuclear Safety and Security Culture Roles and Responsibilities of Individuals. Middle East Scientific Institute for Security (MESIS)

General Assembly. United Nations A/63/411. Information and communication technologies for development. I. Introduction. Report of the Second Committee

12808/16 PG/cb 1 DG G 3 C

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

Second Annual Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Sixth Session, March 2004

INIS: the world s largest nuclear information system

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY INDONESIA For FNCA Human Resource Development 2003 Guritno Lokollo

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

No. prev. doc.: 9108/10 RECH 148 SOC 296 Subject: Social Dimension of the European Research Area - Adoption of Council conclusions

Office for Nuclear Regulation

Item 4.2 of the Draft Provisional Agenda COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

Article 6 of UNFCCC & The New Delhi Work Programme. An overview. Laurence Pollier, Programme Officer Article 6 Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC)

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NEAR SURFACE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ASAM PROJECT

Informal document WP.5 (2016) No. 9

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

International Cooperation in Strengthening Nuclear Security Capacities within Public Company Nuclear Facilities of Serbia

THE GROUP OF GOVERNMENTAL EXPERTS (GGE) REPORT ON TRANSPARENCY AND CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES IN OUTER SPACE ACTIVITIES

At its meeting on 18 May 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee noted the unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.

Technical Support Organization (TSO) Roles and Responsibilities

Advance unedited version. Decision -/CP.13. Development and transfer of technologies under the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SAFETY FRAMEWORK FOR NUCLEAR POWER SOURCE APPLICATIONS IN OUTER SPACE FOR DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PHASES

Pending issues arising from the work of the second Meeting of the Conference of the Parties

Expert Group Meeting on Exponential Technological Change, Automation, and Their Policy Implications for Sustainable Development

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Twenty-fifth session Nairobi, 6 14 November 2006

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/1145/Add.1

International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

WIPO Development Agenda

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Space systems Space debris mitigation requirements. Systèmes spatiaux Exigences de mitigation des débris spatiaux

( ) Page: 1/5 TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES: INFORMATION FROM OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

MEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES. CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Stakeholder Involvement. Nuclear Issues. INSAG and IAEA perspective BASIS FOR KNOWN PUBLIC CONCERN. INSAG-20 Stakeholder Involvement in

International Civil Aviation Organization ASSEMBLY 38TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

and the Climate Technology Centre and Network for 2013

Publishing date: 22/12/2014 Document title: ACER Opinion on the draft ENTSO-E Work Programme We appreciate your feedback

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) Common Implementation Strategy (CIS)

Annex III - 3. Memorandum of Understanding on the development of the Pan-European Transport Corridor VII (The Danube) (DRAFT)

COST FP9 Position Paper

Nuclear Safety. and. the International Atomic Energy Agency

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

EUREKA in the ERA INTRODUCTION

Establishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization

Fourth Annual Multi-Stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals

DERIVATIVES UNDER THE EU ABS REGULATION: THE CONTINUITY CONCEPT

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Preparation of a Policymakers Handbook on E-Commerce and Digital Trade for LDCs, small states and Sub-Saharan Africa

D.2.2 Concept and methodology for ICT Fora

Use of the Graded Approach in Regulation

GENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

Transcription:

4 February 2011 English only Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Forty-eighth session Vienna, 7-18 February 2011 Item 10 of the provisional agenda * Use of nuclear power sources in outer space Introduction to the Workshop 1 Sam Harbison, Chairman of NPS Working Group Abstract The paper provides an introduction to this Workshop, the first in a series approved by the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee (STSC) at its meeting in February 2010. These Workshops will be a major part of the new, 5-year work plan of the NPS Working Group, aimed at following-up and reinforcing the Safety Framework for Nuclear Power Source Applications in Outer Space. The paper describes the development of the Safety Framework and outlines the objectives and strategy of the new work plan. It indicates the expected outcome of this first Workshop and outlines the administrative arrangements that will apply. 1. Development of the Safety Framework The Working Group on the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space has been discussing the safe use of nuclear power source (NPS) applications in outer space for more than a decade. NPS applications in outer space have unique safety considerations compared with terrestrial applications. Unlike many terrestrial nuclear applications, space applications tend to be used infrequently and their requirements can vary significantly depending upon the specific mission. Mission launch and * A/AC.105/C.1/L.306. 1 This paper is also available without images, edited and in all official languages of the United Nations, in document A/AC.105/C.1/L.311. V.11-50569 (E) *1150569*

outer space operational requirements impose size, mass and other space environment limitations not present for many terrestrial nuclear facilities. For some applications, space NPS must operate autonomously at great distances from Earth in harsh environments. Potential accident conditions resulting from launch failures and inadvertent re-entry could expose NPS to extreme physical conditions. These and other unique safety considerations for the use of space NPS are significantly different from those for terrestrial nuclear systems and are not addressed in safety guidance for terrestrial nuclear applications. Between 2003 and 2006, the Working Group reviewed information from national and regional space agencies on the content of relevant national space NPS programmes and all planned or currently foreseeable applications. It also carried out a detailed review of existing international safety principles and standards of potential relevance to space NPS applications. In 2006, it held a joint technical workshop with the IAEA, at which the unique safety aspects of using NPS applications in space were discussed, as well as the scope, attributes and objectives of a possible space NPS safety framework. Following this successful workshop, the STSC agreed to the formation of a joint partnership between the NPS Working Group and the IAEA, to develop a safety framework for nuclear power source applications in outer space. This partnership was realised through a Joint Expert Group (JEG) which worked throughout the period 2007 2009. The JEG completed its work one year ahead of schedule, with the result that the Safety Framework for Nuclear Power Source Applications in Outer Space (the Safety Framework) was adopted by the STSC at its 46 th session in February 2009. In accordance with the agreed working arrangements the Safety Framework was considered and agreed to by the IAEA Commission on Safety Standards at its meeting in April 2009. The Safety Framework is available in A/AC.105/934 and by the IAEA secretariat as a joint publication of the STSC and IAEA. 2. Purpose of the Safety Framework The purpose of the Safety Framework is to provide high-level guidance in the form of a model safety framework. It provides a foundation for the development of national and international intergovernmental safety frameworks while allowing for flexibility in adapting such frameworks to specific space NPS applications and organizational structures. Such national and international intergovernmental frameworks should include both technical and programmatic elements to mitigate risks arising from the use of space NPS. Implementation of such frameworks not only would provide assurance to the global public that space NPS applications would be launched and used in a safe manner, but could also facilitate bilateral and multilateral cooperation on space missions using NPS. The guidance provided reflects an international consensus on measures needed to achieve safety and applies to all space NPS applications without prejudice. 3. Follow-up to Safety Framework The NPS Working Group held an informal intersessional meeting in June 2009, during the 52 nd session of COPUOS, to discuss possible activities to follow up and reinforce the Safety Framework. At that meeting it was decided to recommend the development of a potential new work plan for the period 2010 2015. This was discussed and agreed by the Working Group, and approved by the STSC, in February 2010. The major component of this work plan will be a series of workshops, of 2

which this is the first, with further workshops planned for 2012 and 2013. This series of workshops is intended to assist the NPS Working Group to meet the objectives of the work plan, which are: (a) To promote and facilitate the implementation of the Safety Framework by providing information pertinent to challenges faced by member States and international intergovernmental organizations, in particular those considering or initiating involvement in applications of nuclear power sources in outer space; (b) To identify any technical topics for, and establish the objectives, scope and attributes of, any potential additional work by the Working Group to further enhance safety in the development and use of space NPS applications. Any such additional work would require the approval of the STSC and would be developed with due consideration of relevant principles and treaties. The strategy of the work plan is as follows: (a) Member States and international intergovernmental organizations with experience in the design, development and use of space NPS applications will be invited to provide information on their implementation of the Safety Framework. (b) Member States and international intergovernmental organizations considering or initiating involvement in space NPS applications will be invited to summarize their plans, progress to date and any challenges faced or foreseen in implementing the Safety Framework or specific elements thereof. (c) Member States and international intergovernmental organizations with relevant experience will be invited to provide information (e.g. best practices) targeted to address those implementation issues and challenges identified by member States considering or initiating involvement in space NPS applications. (d) Based on a synthesis of the information exchanged, the Working Group will identify any technical topics and draft the objectives, scope and attributes of potential additional work to further enhance the safe development and use of space NPS applications. 4. Expected outcome of this Workshop As this is the first in a potential series of three workshops it will have a vital role in establishing a rigorous, open and inclusive method of working that should ensure the success of the entire series. It is intended to utilise a small panel of experts, drawn from the NPS Working Group, to stimulate questions and discussion at the end of the presentations but it is also expected that other participants will raise points for clarification or discussion. It is expected that the presentations will: (a) lead to a sharing of information and best practices about the implementation of the Safety Framework (b) help to identify any challenges faced in the implementation of the Safety Framework (c) establish a sound basis for a possible two futher workshops in 2012 and 2013 (d) provide information of assistance to the NPS Working Group in its deliberations about any potential future work to promote and facilitate implementation of the Safety Framework. 3

5. Administrative arrangements The time allocated for this first workshop is limited to two hours with full interpretation facilities. This means that presenters will be expected to adhere rigorously to their time allocation. After each presentation there will be 5 minutes for questions of clarification, with more substantive questions being held over until the general discussion, which will take place when all the presentations have been completed. This general discussion will be initiated by a small panel of members of the NPS Working Group, with the intention of generating a wide-ranging interaction. After the workshop, the NPS Working Group will produce a summary of the proceedings, make it available to participants and include it in a report to the STSC. 4

Introduction to Workshop Sam Harbison Chairman of NPS Working Group Development of the Safety Framework Discussions for more than a decade within NPS Working Group Joint workshop with IAEA in 2006 Work of Joint Expert Group from 2007 2009 Safety Framework adopted by STSC in February 2009; agreed to by IAEA CSS in April 2009; and published jointly by STSC and IAEA in October 2009. 5

Purpose of Safety Framework To provide high-level guidance in the form of a model safety framework It provides a foundation for the development of national and international intergovernmental safety frameworks It recognizes the need for flexibility Its implementation will provide safety assurance to public and facilitate cooperation Follow-up to Safety Framework Discussion of possible follow-up actions in margins of June 2009 COPUOS meeting Multi-year work plan for 2010 2015 adopted by STSC in February 2010 Major component of work plan will be a series of workshops, of which this is the first Further workshops planned for 2012 and 2013 6

Objectives of Work Plan To promote and facilitate implementation of Safety Framework by providing information pertinent to challenges faced by member States and international intergovernmental organizations To identify any technical topics for, and establish the objectives, scope and attributes of, any additional work to further enhance the safe development and use of space NPS applications Expected outcome of Workshop Sharing of information and best practices about implementation of Safety Framework Identification of any challenges faced in implementing the Safety Framework Providing basis for a possible further two workshops in 2012 and 2013 Providing information of assistance to NPS Working Group in deciding on any new work 7

Administrative arrangements Duration and interpretation facilities Length of presentations Questions for clarity General discussions Summary of proceedings and report of the NPS Working Group to the STSC 8