INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS (JCTD) 11 JULY 2018

Similar documents
RAPID FIELDING A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Prototyping: Accelerating the Adoption of Transformative Capabilities

Michael Gaydar Deputy Director Air Platforms, Systems Engineering

Integrated Transition Solutions

DoDI and WSARA* Impacts on Early Systems Engineering

Strategic Guidance. Quest for agility, innovation, and affordability. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

An Element of Digital Engineering Practice in Systems Acquisition

Rapid Fielding A Path for Emerging Concept and Capability Prototyping

Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities

WSARA Impacts on Early Acquisition

DoD Modeling and Simulation Support to Acquisition

Digital Engineering and Engineered Resilient Systems (ERS)

Our Acquisition Challenges Moving Forward

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE SELF-ASSESSMENT. Outcomes and Enablers

Digital Engineering (DE) and Computational Research and Engineering Acquisition Tools and Environments (CREATE)

Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO) Overview

Lesson 17: Science and Technology in the Acquisition Process

Closing the Knowledge-Deficit in the Defense Acquisition System: A Case Study

Program Success Through SE Discipline in Technology Maturity. Mr. Chris DiPetto Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation October 24, 2006

A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #3: Improving the Integration and Synchronization of Science and Technology)

Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Business Case Considerations An Enabler of Risk Reduction

Synopsis and Impact of DoDI

Dedicated Technology Transition Programs Accelerate Technology Adoption. Brad Pantuck

Reducing Manufacturing Risk Manufacturing Readiness Levels

The Drive for Innovation in Systems Engineering

Using the Streamlined Systems Engineering (SE) Method for Science & Technology (S&T) to Identify Programs with High Potential to Meet Air Force Needs

AAC/XR: Shaping Tomorrow

Modeling & Simulation Roadmap for JSTO-CBD IS CAPO

Test & Evaluation Strategy for Technology Development Phase

TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: INCREASING THE VALUE OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA)

Technology & Manufacturing Readiness RMS

Digital Engineering Support to Mission Engineering

The Role of the Communities of Interest (COIs) March 25, Dr. John Stubstad Director, Space & Sensor Systems, OASD (Research & Engineering)

Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN DOD ACQUISITION

USEUCOM Science & Technology, E

Technology Transition Assessment in an Acquisition Risk Management Context

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) requires the intelligence community. Threat Support Improvement. for DoD Acquisition Programs

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

DUSD (S&T) Software Intensive Systems

DoD Research and Engineering Enterprise

Air Force Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Module 2 Lesson 201 Project Coordinator (PC) Duties

DoD Engineering and Better Buying Power 3.0

Breakthroughs in Applying Systems Engineering to Technology Development

Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 4 Systems Engineering Update: Overview Briefing

Transitioning Technology to Naval Ships. Dr. Norbert Doerry Technical Director, SEA 05 Technology Group SEA05TD

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

Technology Roadmapping. Lesson 3

An Assessment of Acquisition Outcomes and Potential Impact of Legislative and Policy Changes

The New DoD Systems Acquisition Process

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs) In an S&T Environment

Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Advanced Technology Support Program IV (ATSP4) Organizational Perspective and Technical Requirements

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #102

Systems Engineering for Military Ground Vehicle Systems

Other Transaction Authority (OTA)

Advancing the Use of the Digital System Model Taxonomy

Click to edit Master title style. Joint Service Small Arms Technology Plan

Challenges and Innovations in Digital Systems Engineering

Technology Transition

Best Practices for Technology Transition. Technology Maturity Conference September 12, 2007

Defense Innovation Day Unmanned Systems

DoD Research and Engineering

Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels [Draft]

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List Item No. 127 Page 1 of 1

Digital Engineering. Phoenix Integration Conference Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments.

Moving from R&D to Manufacture

Stakeholder and process alignment in Navy installation technology transitions

Engineered Resilient Systems DoD Science and Technology Priority

Department of Defense Independent Research & Development (IR&D) and the Defense Innovation Marketplace

2017 AIR FORCE CORROSION CONFERENCE Corrosion Policy, Oversight, & Processes

Models, Simulations, and Digital Engineering in Systems Engineering Restructure (Defense Acquisition University CLE011)

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta

OSD Engineering Enterprise: Digital Engineering Initiatives

Engineering Autonomy

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NAVSTAR Global Positioning System User Equipment Space

Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs) from a Cost Estimating Perspective

AF Life Cycle Management Center

Other Transaction Agreements. Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum

Software-Intensive Systems Producibility

Digital Engineering. Ms. Philomena Zimmerman. Deputy Director, Engineering Tools and Environments OUSD(R&E)/Systems Engineering

Spiral Acquisition and the Integrated Command and Control System

Manufacturing Readiness Levels (MRLs) and Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs)

Panel: Systems Engineering Considerations in Practicing Test & Evaluation A Perspective from DoD

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DMSMS Management: After Years of Evolution, There s Still Room for Improvement

Technology Program Management Model (TPMM) Overview

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS)

Understanding DARPA - How to be Successful - Peter J. Delfyett CREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics

(This page intentionally blank)

Challenges and Opportunities in the Changing Science & Technology Landscape

Manufacturing Readiness Level Deskbook

DEFENSE AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CONSORTIUM (DATC) WORKSHOP OCTOBER 12, 2017

Voluntary Education Program Readiness (Force Education & Training)

Administrative Change to AFRLI , Science and Technology (S&T) Systems Engineering (SE) and Technical Management

I. Introduction. Cover note. A. Mandate. B. Scope of the note. Technology Executive Committee. Fifteenth meeting. Bonn, Germany, September 2017

Typical Project Life Cycle

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS (JCTD) 11 JULY 2018 RICK GALLMAN richard.gallman@dau.mil 256-922-8720 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY (DAU)

AGENDA WHAT IS THE JCTD JCTD PROGRAM OVERVIEW JCTD PROJECT DESCRIPTION JCIDS and JCTDs ACQUISITION and JCTDs LEVERAGING JCTD for MIDDLE-TIER ACQUSITION TO LEARN MORE ABOUT JCTDs WRAP-UP L&l_JCTD_-2

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION JCTD PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Emerging Capability & Prototyping (EC&P) DASD Emerging Capability & Prototyping TBD Acting Dr. Chuck Perkins Phot o Deputy Director Prototyping & Experimentation Mr. Glenn Fogg Phot o Deputy Director Emerging Capability Dr. Chuck Perkins Rapid Reaction Technology Office Mr. Jon Lazar Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations Mr. Elmer Roman Comparative Technology Office Col Sean Bradley Initiatives & Analysis Ms. Ellen Purdy - Emerging Capability Technology Demonstrations (ECTDs) - Quick Reaction Support Program (QRSP) - Rapid Prototyping Program (RPP) Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations Projects (JCTDs) Foreign Comparative Test (FCT) - Spectrum Access R&D - Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Political appointee Career SES/GS-15/Mil 0-6 L&l_JCTD_-4

Emerging Capability & Prototyping (EC&P) DASD Emerging Capability & Prototyping TBD Acting Dr. Chuck Perkins Phot o Deputy Director Prototyping & Experimentation Mr. Glenn Fogg Phot o Deputy Director Emerging Capability Dr. Chuck Perkins Rapid Reaction Technology Office Mr. Jon Lazar Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations Mr. Elmer Roman Comparative Technology Office Col Sean Bradley Initiatives & Analysis Ms. Ellen Purdy - Emerging Capability Technology Demonstrations (ECTDs) - Quick Reaction Support Program (QRSP) - Rapid Prototyping Program (RPP) Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations Projects (JCTDs) Foreign Comparative Test (FCT) - Spectrum Access R&D - Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Political appointee Career SES/GS-15/Mil 0-6 L&l_JCTD_-5

JCTD Program Created in 1995, the Advanced Concepts Technology Demonstration Program (precursor to JCTDs) emerged from the Packard Commission as a way to reduce cost and risk of entering full-scale acquisition Mission Address Combatant Command (CCMD) and Joint warfighting gaps through prototyping and demonstration of innovative and game-changing technologies Objectives Demonstrate solutions within 2-4 years (from the identification of a warfighting gap) Deliver meaningful military utility and refine CONOPs / TTPs Provide effective leave-behind capabilities when required Facilitate technology transition to acquisition programs Leverage open architectures to enhance interoperability and promote affordability Unique Project Structure Oversight provided by an integrated management team of key stakeholders (CCMD OM, Service TM, Service XM) Dedicated funding to commence work in the year of selection Relief from some JCIDS requirements Opportunities for a truncated acquisition process (post-jctd) CONOPS Concept of Operations, TTP Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures OM Operational Manager, TM Technical Manager, XM Transition Manager JCIDS Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System A long history of accelerating the transition of affordable, game-changing capabilities L&l_JCTD_-6

JCTD End-To-End Process Identification & Approval of Proposals Review Strategic Priorities Operational Challenges Requests for Proposals Technical Assessment Panel Project Selection & Congressional Notification JCTD Entrance Criteria: Valid CCMD Need Partner Commitments Joint, interagency, coalition? Transition path? Non-duplicative Decision Based on: Results from Program Reviews Transition Agreement with Committed Funds Iterative Execution: Months 1-XX Dev / Integration Tech Demo #1 Ops Demo #1 User Assessment #1 Program Reviews Fund next increment? No Transition, Return to Lab, or Terminate Program Review Focus: Performance, Schedule, Cost Transition Status Obligations & Expenditures Yes Joint Staff Interaction Execution: Months XX-ZZ Dev / Integration Tech Demo #2+ Ops Demo #2+ User Assessment #2 Final Capability Delivered J7 - Experimentation & shaping new doctrine; Full DOTMLPF solution J8 Ensure JCTDs address IPLs, Unfilled JEONs & JUONs Multiple Tech Demos & Ops Demos, As Needed Successful Transition Results L&l_JCTD_-7

JCTD Proposal Initiate data call for new start proposals based on technical and operational relevancy in support of : National Defense Strategy & Execution Strategy Chairman Joint Chief of Staff s Capability Gap Assessment USD (R&E) and Military Services Science and Technology (S&T) Strategies Proposal Selection Process Services, CCMDs, and Defense Agencies establish cross-functional teams (technical, operational, and transition managers) to propose projects OSD staff leads initial review and solicits input from Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) o Proposals are graded on: Technology innovation, degree of jointness, cost share (1-to-1 is goal), and transition potential (into a program of record, or informing an evolving acquisition initiative) Final Proposals reviewed by Executive Cross-Functional Team, led by USD(R&E) Initiate ~8-12 new start projects each FY (Goal) L&l_JCTD_-8

JCTD Project Selection Guidelines Addresses a JOINT, cross-cutting / multi-domain, or open systems capability Multi-Service / Agency, multi-platform, interoperability, or joint coalition need Technology capability that addresses an operational challenge Can build upon, but does not duplicate ongoing Service / Agency investments Supported by Service S&T Executive(s) Impact to warfighter is clearly stated What IPL, JUON/JEON, or other requirement is being addressed Technology is mature enough (TRL 6-9) to support a military utility assessment Accelerates development & demo of technology to satisfy operational gap(s) TRL 4 start is acceptable if technology is a game-changer and the CCMD supports as potential gap-filler CCMD Operational Sponsorship: Required Demonstrated level of Service or Agency interest Primary: Strong commitment with stated interest by Service S&T Executives and S&T Community of Interest (COI) Optional: Interagency or international participation Identified CCMD (operational), technical, and transition leads L&l_JCTD_-9

Notational Timeline for JCTD Project Selection (Key Events) FY 20xx Project Selection Timeline Program / Project Recommendations to USD (R&E) USD (R&E) Approval Congressional Package (+45 Days) Congressional Notification FY 20zz Project Selection Timeline ID / Revise Focus Areas & Operational Challenges for FYzz Quad Charts EC&P Review Initial Proposals JCTD Project Call Spring 20zz Technical Assessment Panel S&T Executive Review Final Proposals Final R&E Approval 1Q FY20xx 2Q FY20xx 3Q FY20xx 4Q FY20xx 1Q FY20zz 2QFY20zz L&l_JCTD_-10

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION JCTD PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Limited Operational Use & Transition to Acquisition JCTD Project Life Cycle Formulation Proposal Selection User Need Candidate Formulation Proposal & Selection Implementation Directive Rapid Start-Up Planning Transition Strategy Planning and Implementation Technical Implementation Strategy Transition Planning & Preparation (XM) Systems Engineering, Integration, Test, & Support (TM) Acquisition & Fielding Support Package Tech Data Field & Support Residual Capability Transition Path(s) Review & Recommendations Transition Mature Technology Management Plan Assessment Strategy Prototype Ready for Operational Demo Operational Demos & Military Utility Assessment (OM) MUA Report Acquire More Up to 1 Year Of Preparation 1 st Year Deliverable Encouraged to Demonstrate Progress Variable L&l_JCTD_-12

Characteristics of a Typical JCTD Project Address the Strategic Priorities of the DoD with Innovative Concepts and Mature Technologies Developmental Prototype Usually Joint, Often Combined / Coalition / Interagency Rapid Results: 2-4 Years Expectations: Technical & Operational Demonstrations, MUA, Fieldable Prototype Integrated Management Team (IMT) which consists of technology developer, user, and acquisition professional. Concepts of Operations, Doctrine, and TTPs to use Prototype in operational environments Operational Demonstrations with Warfighter to Understand the Operational Potential of Technological Capabilities Before Committing to Acquisition/Sustainment Decision Military Utility Assessment Endorsed by Sponsoring CCMD Capability Solution With Matching Operational Concepts & TTPs as Go-To-War Capable (Residual Capability) to Warfighters Multiple Funding Sources / Cost share essential to execution and success of the JCTD Transition Agreement(s) with identified paths to Acquisition Emphasis on Demonstration and Transition TRY WITH INTENT TO BUY L&l_JCTD_-13

Key Roles of JCTD Project Management Oversight Executive (OE) from JCTD PMO Technical Manager (TM) normally technical SME of Lead Service or Lead Agency Operational Manager (OM) normally from Combatant Commander (CCMD) User Sponsor Transition Manager (XM) normally acquisition SME Supporting CCMDs, Services and Components others that have functional interest and/or are committing resources. Assessment Organization (e.g., Independent Assessor) supporting the OM L&l_JCTD_-14

JCTD Project Management Structure CCMD DASD Emerging Capability & Prototyping JCTD Program Office Suppliers Program Office Lab Contractor JCTD Oversight Group Management Plan Signatories Lead Service/Agency Oversight Executive OE Assessment Organization for OM Operational Manager OM Transition Manager XM Technical Manager TM Successful JCTDs Require Frequent & Effective Communications & Collaboration Among TM, OM, XM, Assisted by JCTD Program Office OE L&l_JCTD_-15

Activities Products & Documentation Events JCTD PROJECT EXECUTION MODEL Technical Tests EXPERIMENTATION MUA CCMD Endorsement Assessment Strategy Readiness Review Closeout Briefing Limited Operational Use (LOU) Operational Prototype Residuals SME Support SME Availability to PoR Initial Draft Initial Updates Final Initial Functional / Operational Prototypes & Support Transition to Acquisition Negotiated PoR IInputs -Specifications -AcqStrategies -Performance Data -Certifications -Cost Data -Licenses -Analytics -Draft Documents Initiation Integration Assessment Transition Staffing JCTD Team* Training JCTD Team* Governance & Forming IPTs Management Planning* Implementation Directive (ID) Mgt Plan (MP) Requesting/obtaining funding Identifying Capabilities & Requirements* Evaluating Alternatives* Business Case (if needed) Designing Technical Solution Set* Determining Contracting Approach* Defining Technical Implementation Strategy* * - Started During Proposal Dev t Implementing Management Approaches/Tools Completing Solution Set Design Building Development Prototype Solution Set Planning & Executing Systems Integration Planning & Executing Technical Tests & Technical Demos Developing Training Plan Developing LOU Support Strategy Developing CONOPS/TT&Ps Initiating OD Planning Developing Assessment Strategy & Plan Initiating Transition Planning / Coordination Conduct Ass t Readiness Review Completing Technical Tests & Technical Demonstrations using Developmental Prototypes Providing Training Completing Integrated Assessment Plan (IAP) Completing Ops Demo Planning Planning & Conducting Demo Readiness Reviews Executing Ops Demos with Developmental Prototypes Continuing CONOPS Refinement Developing Draft DOTMLPF Recommendation Package Preparing Demo Report after each OD Conducting Military Utility Assessment (MUA) Refining Transition Agreements Completing MUA Report Coordinating CCMD Endorsement of MUA Coordinating with PoRs, Services, Agencies Transition Path(s) Review & Recommendations by all JCTD Project Participants Executing Transition Agreements Providing Prototype Residuals to Implement LOU Sustaining Prototype Residuals during LOU Supporting Transition to Acquisition Preparing JCTD Closeout Briefing 16 L&l_JCTD_-16

JCTD Project Concurrent Activities Concurrent Overlapping Competing L&l_JCTD_-17

Initiation Phase Primary Activities Staffing JCTD Team* Training JCTD Team* Governance & Forming IPTs Management Planning* Implementation Directive (ID) Mgt Plan (MP) Evaluating Alternatives* Business Case (if needed) Designing Technical Solution Set* Requesting & Obtaining Funding Identifying Capabilities & Requirements* Determining Contracting Approach* Defining Technical Implementation Strategy* * - Started During Proposal Development L&l_JCTD_-18

Initiation Phase Summary In the Initiation Phase the JCTD Team Organizes, Trains, and Plans for those events that will define the success or failure of the JCTD The ID and the MP are Prepared and are Required Deliverables to JCTD PMO L&l_JCTD_-19

Integration Phase Primary Activities Implementing Management Approaches/Tools Completing Solution Set Design Building Development Prototype Solution Set Planning & Executing Systems Integration Planning & Executing Technical Tests & Technical Demos Developing Training Plan Developing Support Strategy Developing CONOPS/TT&Ps Initiating Operational Demonstration Planning Developing Assessment Strategy & Plan Initiating Transition Planning / Coordination Development of transition agreements. L&l_JCTD_-20

Integration Phase Summary Majority of the JCTD Project technical work occurs here Priority is on integrating technologies to provide a new capability Best practices for managing a JCTD project, proven to be significant enhancers of success, are normally captured in the Implementation Directive and Management Plan WBS / Integrated Scheduling / Risk Management / Configuration Management Key objective is reducing risks for the Assessment activities, both technical & operational Assessment Readiness Review To Ensure Assessment Activities can proceed (Joint TM,OM,XM Activity) Operational & Transition activities are well underway L&l_JCTD_-21

Assessment Phase Overview During the Assessment phase, much of the work centers on activities leading up to and the execution of operational demonstrations Primary Activities Covered in subsequent modules Completing Technical Tests & Technical Demonstrations using Developmental Prototypes Providing Training Completing Integrated Assessment Plan (IAP) Completing Ops Demo Planning Planning & Conducting Demo Readiness Reviews Executing Ops Demos with Developmental Prototypes Continuing CONOPS Refinement Developing Draft DOTMLPF Recommendation Package Preparing Demo Report after each OD Conducting Military Utility Assessment (MUA) Refining Transition Agreements L&l_JCTD_-22

Assessment Phase Summary One or more Operational Demonstrations (OD are conducted Each OD identified is documented in a Demonstration Execution Document (DED) Integrated Assessment Plan (IAP) is the overarching source document for all ODs Building Development Prototype Solution Set Critical Operational Issues (COIs) / MOEs / MOPs are Identified Military Utility Assessment (MUA) after all ODs Completed DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) Prepared Transition Agreements should be finalized and signed, if not already completed L&l_JCTD_-23

Transition Phase Primary Activities Covered in Subsequent Modules: Completing MUA Report Coordinating CCMD Endorsement of MUA Coordinating with PoRs, Services, Agencies Transition Path(s) Review & Recommendations by all JCTD Project Participants Executing Transition Agreements Providing Prototype Residuals to Implement LOU Sustaining Prototype Residuals during LOU Supporting Transition to Acquisition Preparing JCTD Closeout Briefing 24 L&l_JCTD_-24

Transition Phase Summary Transition of Operationally Useful Technology to the warfighter and/or acquisition is the measure of success of the JCTD Project Transition generally can occur through three paths: Limited Operational Use (LOU) (interim deployment of the JCTD solution set) Follow-on acquisition (transitioning into Defense Acquisition System to a new or existing Program of Record) Availability on the General Services Administration schedule Transition Paths are supported, as required MUA Report is Finalized & Endorsed by the Sponsoring CCMD (hopefully) Closeout Briefing is completed Residual Capabilities Solutions are supported, as required, for LOUs Plans, partnerships and transition agreements are refined and coordinated through the Integration and Assessment phases Transition Planning must begin early-on in the JCTD Process Transition Management is a Contact Sport L&l_JCTD_-25

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION JCIDS and JCTDs

JCIDS and JCTDs Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations (JCTDs) and other experiments. At a minimum, assessments of JCTDs and other completed experimentation must, if applicable, establish the operational utility of the capability solution and provide the basis for establishing an enduring capability requirement. The scope of the assessment may be tailored depending upon the level of detail available to the Sponsor and the nature of the demonstrated capability solution. (a) An assessment may be a suitable replacement for analysis used as the basis for ICD, CDD, or CPD preparation, depending upon the maturity of the capability solution. In these cases, assessments are to contain the critical elements of information that are described for CBAs and required in the capability requirement documents, including description of the capability requirements and associated gap(s); associated tasks, conditions, and operational performance standards/metrics; and how the materiel and nonmaterial approaches address these factors. JCIDS Manual (Enclosure C): 12 February 2015 L&l_JCTD_-27

JCIDS and JCTDs A synergistic JCTD can rapidly develop a capability & transition to MS B or C faster than the normal JCIDS process. The technology build, subsequent ODs, & MUA can equate to the JCIDS CBA, ICD, AoA, etc., which can underpin a CDD or CPD, and support an MDA s decision to accept the technology for a PoR. The essential JCIDS components can be included in the JCTD ID, Management Plans, Methodologies, Assessment Plans, Data Collection Plans, and other events to support both the JCIDS and JCTD processes. Specific tasks supporting JCIDS documentation may be necessary to properly capture JCIDS inputs. L&l_JCTD_-28

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION ACQUISITION and JCTDs

The Valley of Death The Divide Between the S&T and Program Management L&l_JCTD_-30

Acquisition & JCTDs Transition to Acquisition May occur concurrently with Limited Operational Use. Requires close coordination with the gaining Program(s) of Record in accordance with previously signed Transition Agreements. It may also include efforts such as: Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) Planning/Support Assist in preparation of Issue Papers Interoperability Roadmap Information Assurance (IA) Report Business Case Analysis Deliverables to POR(s) Early identification of resource needs of transition players is critical (requirements, POR needs, certifications, etc.) L&l_JCTD_-31

TRANSITION TO ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITIES JCTD PROGRAM Early S&T Prototyping & Experimentation Proof of Concept / Lab Prototypes Experimentation Developmental / Functional Prototypes Testing Operational Prototypes Demonstration Pre-Production Prototypes Demonstration Production / Product Improvement Prototypes Limited Operational Use (LOU) Operational Prototype Residuals Validated ICD User Needs UON Statement SIG RAA Primary Activities For Phase MDD MS A MS B MS C Materiel Solution Analysis AoA Eng Analyses/Trades Ops Analyses CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction & Support Tech MaturationRisk Analysis Prototyping Sustainment Planning Design CDD Validation T&E Planning Ops Analyses Transition to Acquisition Negotiated PoR IInputs -Specifications -AcqStrategies -Performance Data -Certifications -Cost Data -Licenses -Analytics -Draft Documents Engineering & Manufacturing Development CPD Contract Oversight T&E Production/Manuf Analyses Performance Analyses Detailed Design CPD Validation Risk Analyses Production & Deployment Procurement Contract Oversight Production Line Analyses T&E Sustainment Analyses Deployment Operations & Support Contract Oversight Logistics Analyses T&E Sustainment Disposal L&l_JCTD_-32

DoDI 5000.02 Model 4: Accelerated Acquisition Program Materiel Development Decision Preliminary Design Review IOC FOC A/B C OT&E Sustainment Disposal Materiel Solution Analysis Concurrent Technology Maturation, Risk Reduction and Development Concurrent Production and Deployment Operations & Support Legend: = Milestone Decision = Decision Point is a model that applies when schedule considerations dominate over cost and technical risk considerations This model compresses or eliminates phases of the process and accepts the potential for Left:.6 inefficiencies in order to achieve a deployed capability on a compressed schedule Right:.8 Top: 0 The model shows one example of tailoring Bottom: for 2 accelerated acquisition and many others are possible For products that must be developed and acquired as quickly as possible, usually motivated by a potential adversary achieving technological surprise, and featuring a greater acceptance of program risk L&l_JCTD_-333

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION JCTDs and MIDDLE-TIER ACQUISITION

FY16 NDAA Sec 804 What Does it Say Short Version Provides for a merit-based process for Considering innovative technologies / new capabilities Demonstrating & evaluating performance of Fieldale prototypes in an operational environment Transitioning successful prototypes to new or existing PoRs Directs USD/AT&L to establish guidance for a middle tier of acquisition programs that are intended to be completed in a period of two to five years Identifies two middle tier acquisition pathways Rapid Prototyping Rapid Fielding Programs shall NOT be subject to JCIDS or DODD 5000.01 except to the extent specifically provided in the guidance L&l_JCTD_-35

FY16 NDAA Sec 804 Provides for a merit-based process for Directs USD/AT&L to establish guidance for a middle tier of acquisition programs that are intended to be completed in a period of two to five years Identifies two middle tier acquisition pathways Rapid Prototyping Rapid Fielding Programs shall NOT be subject to JCIDS or DODD 5000.01 except to the extent specifically provided in the guidance L&l_JCTD_-36

Rapid Prototyping & Rapid Fielding (Middle Tier) Four Phases 1.Prototyping (Alpha) 2.Fielding and Initial Production (Beta) 3.Modernization and Follow on Production (Gamma) 4.Operations and Sustainment (Delta Organizations using authority are authorized to initiate Rapid Prototyping Field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment Residual capability within 5 years of development of an approved requirement Rapid Fielding Begin production within 6 months Complete fielding within 5 years of an approved requirement L&l_JCTD_-37

Rapid Prototyping & Rapid Fielding Four Phases 1.Prototyping (Alpha) 2.Fielding and Initial Production (Beta) 3.Modernization and Follow on Production (Gamma) 4.Operations and Sustainment (Delta Organizations using authority are authorized to initiate Rapid Prototyping within 5 years of development of an approved requirement Rapid Fielding Begin production within 6 months Complete fielding within 5 years of an approved requirement L&l_JCTD_-38

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION TO LEARN MORE ABOUTJCTDs

TO LEARN MORE ABOUTJCTDs JCTD WEB SITE JCTD Program https://www.acq.osd.mil/ecp/programs/jctd.html Includes link to the JCTD DoD Techipedia Website RELATED RESOURCES DASD Emerging Capabilities and Prototypes Web Site https://www.acq.osd.mil/ecp/index.html Select Joint Capability and Technology Demonstration DAU S&T Management Community https://www.dau.mil/cop/stm/pages/default.aspx L&l_JCTD_-40

JCTD Project Training & Facilitation DAU JCTD SUPPORT MISSION To assist the Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) Program in identifying and providing the necessary and sufficient Education and Training (E&T), Workshops, and Facilitation to minimize risks to and enhance the likelihood of successful JCTD projects 25+ Years Combined ACTD/JCTD Practitioner Experience Across OM, TM, & XM Domains Subject Matter Expertise in All Areas & Disciplines of DoD System Acquisition DAU LEARNING ASSETS: Addresses Activities across the JCTD Project Life Cycle JCTD Execution & Overview Course (2.5 days) JCTD Practitioners Workshops (Requested / Tailored) OM / TM / XM Roles & Responsibilities Introductory Short Courses DAU Mobile Training & Support Team (MTST) On-Call Team (Multi-Functional) of SMEs for Consulting Advice On-Call Individual SME Consulting Advice On-Call Honest Broker Reviews Customizable Training & Facilitation Available to Meet Your Needs L&l_JCTD_-41

JCTD Project Training & Support Assistance DAU POC: LEAD: Dr. Tom Conroy) (703) 805-4989 thomas.conroy2@dau.mil If you have an Assigned Oversight Executive, contact them to request Workshop, Facilitation, &/or Training Support L&l_JCTD_-42

INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION WRAP-UP

What is a Successful JCTD? Real world criteria: Did the Warfighter/Supporters of the Warfighter benefit? Yes PM adopts technology and incorporates into PoR New PoR established to further develop/acquire Kept in the field and used as is (Limited or Long-term Operational Use) Acquire more units New/existing PM, GSA Schedule, CCMD procurement Not yet but potential future benefit Technology Transfer - Technology made available to contractors for use in current/future products (military and commercial) Not suitable for current use return to S&T world for further development Mature, but not affordable (below the cut line) L&l_JCTD_-44

JCTDs Can Help With Controlling Life Cycle Costs Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction L&l_JCTD_-45

JCTDs Can Help Bridge The Valley of Death L&l_JCTD_-46

Events Activities Products & Documentation JCTD PROJECT EXECUTION MODEL A SOURCE OF BEST PRACTICES Technical Tests EXPERIMENTATION MUA CCMD Endorsement Assessment Strategy Readiness Review Closeout Briefing Limited Operational Use (LOU) Operational Prototype Residuals SME Support SME Availability to PoR Initial Draft Initial Updates Final Initial Functional / Operational Prototypes & Support Transition to Acquisition Negotiated PoR IInputs -Specifications -AcqStrategies -Performance Data -Certifications -Cost Data -Licenses -Analytics -Draft Documents Initiation Integration Assessment Transition Staffing JCTD Team* Training JCTD Team* Governance & Forming IPTs Management Planning* Implementation Directive (ID) Mgt Plan (MP) Requesting/obtaining funding Identifying Capabilities & Requirements* Evaluating Alternatives* Business Case (if needed) Designing Technical Solution Set* Determining Contracting Approach* Defining Technical Implementation Strategy* * - Started During Proposal Dev t Implementing Management Approaches/Tools Completing Solution Set Design Building Development Prototype Solution Set Planning & Executing Systems Integration Planning & Executing Technical Tests & Technical Demos Developing Training Plan Developing LOU Support Strategy Developing CONOPS/TT&Ps Initiating OD Planning Developing Assessment Strategy & Plan Initiating Transition Planning / Coordination Conduct Ass t Readiness Review Completing Technical Tests & Technical Demonstrations using Developmental Prototypes Providing Training Completing Integrated Assessment Plan (IAP) Completing Ops Demo Planning Planning & Conducting Demo Readiness Reviews Executing Ops Demos with Developmental Prototypes Continuing CONOPS Refinement Developing Draft DOTMLPF Recommendation Package Preparing Demo Report after each OD Conducting Military Utility Assessment (MUA) Refining Transition Agreements Completing MUA Report Coordinating CCMD Endorsement of MUA Coordinating with PoRs, Services, Agencies Transition Path(s) Review & Recommendations by all JCTD Project Participants Executing Transition Agreements Providing Prototype Residuals to Implement LOU Sustaining Prototype Residuals during LOU Supporting Transition to Acquisition Preparing JCTD Closeout Briefing 47 L&l_JCTD_-47

JCTD BEST PRACTICES SUPPORT POTENTIAL SEC 804 RAPID PATHWAYS Approved Requirement (No JCIDS) Rapid Prototyping IOC or MVP 5 Years O&S of Operational Capability Rapid Fielding (Production) <6 Month Start 5 Years New or Existing Program Another Prototype Tailored JCTD Processes/Procedures/Tools L&l_JCTD_-48

?????Questions????? INTRODUCTION TO JOINT CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION?????Questions????? L&l_JCTD_-49