Feasibility Analysis for a Manned Mars Free-Return Mission in 2018

Similar documents
Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations

Uranus Exploration Challenges

Feasibility Analysis for a Manned Mars Free-Return Mission in 2018

NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016

Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration

HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014

Martian Outpost. Erik Seedhouse. The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars

The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section

A Unified Space Vision

ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada

The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)

Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout CubeSat Mission

Nanosat Deorbit and Recovery System to Enable New Missions

Free-flying Satellite Inspector

CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS

NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report

WHAT WILL AMERICA DO IN SPACE NOW?

Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.

Planetary CubeSats, nanosatellites and sub-spacecraft: are we all talking about the same thing?

The JPL A-Team and Mission Formulation Process

Marco Polo: The European contribution

CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Update Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA

Science Plenary II: Science Missions Enabled by Nuclear Power and Propulsion. Chair / Organizer: Steven D. Howe Center for Space Nuclear Research

Exploration Systems Research & Technology

Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0

Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Lecturer Series ASTRONOMY. FH Astros. Telecommunication with Space Craft. Kurt Niel (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria)

Human mission to Mars: The concept

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Red Dragon. Feasibility of a Dragon-derived Mars lander for scientific and human-precursor missions. May 7, 2013

Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012

Current Status of Hayabusa2. Yuichi Tsuda, Project Manager, Hayabusa2 Project Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Action Vehicle Action Surface Systems. -Exc. -Processing -Growth

NEO Science and Human Space Activity. Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group

Near Term Space Settlement: Risk Reduction Missions

Shooting for the Moon

When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009

A Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962

NASA TA-02 In-space Propulsion Roadmap Priorities

Current and Future Missions to the Moon

Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions

The International Lunar Network (ILN) and the US Anchor Nodes mission

Space Architecture MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Space Architecture. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

MarCO: Ready for Launch Andrew Klesh, Joel Krajewski

STEM Teacher Roundtable Aerospace Engineering Sean Tully CRS/Cygnus Systems Engineering Manager

Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration

MAVEN continues Mars exploration begun 50 years ago by Mariner 4 5 November 2014, by Bob Granath

Chapter 2 Planning Space Campaigns and Missions

Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011

European Manned Space Projects and related Technology Development. Dipl.Ing. Jürgen Herholz Mars Society Deutschland Board Member marssociety.

ESA Preparation for Human Exploration ACQUIRING CAPABILITIES

ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway

Universal CubeSat Platform Design Technique

hal , version 1-15 Feb 2012

China Manned Space Flight Program

Apollo Part 1 13 Sept 2017

2014 Mission Design Mars Sample Return. Mission. Steven C. Martinez

In Space Propulsion Overview January Outline. Les Johnson Manager, In Space Propulsion Technology Projects Office

Drag and Atmospheric Neutral Density Explorer

Pterodactyl: Integrated Control Design for Precision Targeting of Deployable Entry Vehicles

launch probability of success

Tropnet: The First Large Small-Satellite Mission

NASA s Changing Human Spaceflight Exploration Plans

An Explore Mars BE BOLD technical project. Sanford Morton Emily Briere Cassidy Chan

NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee

Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):

Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures

Space Technology FY 2013

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

The Lunar Exploration Campaign

Airbus DS ESA Phase-0 L5 Spacecraft/Orbital Concept Overview. Emanuele Monchieri 6 th March 2017

Judith L. Robinson, Ph.D. Associate Director Space Life Sciences Directorate Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas USA

Reducing the Challenges Posed by Titan Missions

IAA Space Exploration Conference

The Future for CubeSats Present and Coming Launch Opportunities 18th Annual AIAA / USU Conference on Small Satellites CubeSat Workshop

Constellation Systems Division

Space Settlement Laboratory

Team 6: University of Colorado Boulder (USA)

IAC-14.D2.8-A5.4.2 COOPERATIVE SCENARIOS FOR HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW EARTH ORBIT

NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft

Interplanetary CubeSat Launch Opportunities and Payload Accommodations

Venus Aircraft. design evolution Geoffrey A. Landis. NASA John Glenn Research Center. Geoffrey A. Landis.

Reaching for the Stars

2013 RockSat-C Preliminary Design Review

ASSEMBLY AND SERVICING OF SPACE TELESCOPES

Space Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future

The TEXAS Satellite Design Laboratory: An Overview of Our Current Projects FASTRAC, BEVO-2, & ARMADILLO

Emerging LEO Economy. Carissa Christensen April 26, 2016

Kennedy Space Center. Connecting Space Grant with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas

New Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design:

RD-180 Availability Risk Mitigation Study Summary

CubeSat Launch and Deployment Accommodations

The Future of Space Exploration in the USA. Jakob Silberberg

CubeSat Solid Rocket Motor Propulsion Systems providing DVs greater than 500 m/s

A Road Map To Mars BY ROBERT ASH. Courtesy of NASA/JPL/Caltech

SmallSat Access to Space

Quest Institute: The ISS has been continuously occupied since November In that time, more than 200 people from 15 countries have visited.

Space Radiation & Charging Cube Satellite (SPARCCS) Project

Austere Human Missions to Mars

SPACE. (Some space topics are also listed under Mechatronic topics)

Transcription:

Feasibility Analysis for a Manned Mars Free-Return Mission in 2018 Inspiration Mars Dennis Tito, Taber MacCallum, John Carrico, 8 May, 2013

Authors Dennis A. Tito Inspiration Mars Foundation Grant Anderson Paragon Space Development Corporation John P. Carrico, Jr. Applied Defense Solutions, Inc. Jonathan Clark, MD Center for Space Medicine Baylor College Of Medicine Barry Finger Paragon Space Development Corporation Gary A Lantz Paragon Space Development Corporation Michel E. Loucks Space Exploration Engineering Corporation Taber MacCallum Paragon Space Development Corporation Jane Poynter Paragon Space Development Corporation Thomas H. Squire Thermal Protection Materials NASA Ames Research Center S. Pete Worden Brig. Gen., USAF, Ret. NASA AMES Research Center Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 2

Background Worked on first Mars flyby trajectory at JPL: Mariner 4 Presented at the 2 nd Annual AIAA Meeting Started researching trajectories for human deep space missions This research led to the identification of a rare, 501-day, Quick Free-return Mars fly-by launch opportunity in January, 2018 Commissioned feasibility study for publication at IEEE Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 3

Moonish R. Patel, James M. Longuski, Jon A. Sims, Mars Free Return Trajectories, JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, Vol. 35, No. 3, May June 1998 Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 4

Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 5

A 501-day free-return Mars flyby passing within a hundred miles of the surface Only small correction maneuvers are needed during transit Simple mission architecture lowers risk No entry into Mars atmosphere An exceptionally quick free return occurs twice every 15 years 1.4 years duration vs. 2 to 3.5 years typical Launch Jan 5, 2018, (or 2031) Mars on 20 Aug 2018 (227 days) Earth on 20 May 2019 (274 days) At Mars, Earth is 38,000,000 miles away Trajectory Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 6

Trajectory Targeting Optimized 2-body/patched-conic trajectory values from Mission Analysis Environment (MAnE, from Space Flight Solutions): Leg Stay Time (days) Depart Arrive Flight Time (days) 1 Earth JAN 5, 2018, 7.1756 hours GMT AUG 20, 2018, 7.8289 hours GMT Mars Julian Date 58123.7990 Julian Date 58350.8262 227.0272 2 0.0000 Mars AUG 20, 2018, 7.8289 hours GMT MAY 21, 2019, 20.9618 hours GMT Earth Julian Date 58350.8262 Julian Date 58625.3734 274.5472 Total Duration 501.5744 Leg V Inf (km/s) V Inf (km/s) 1 6.22697 5.42540 2 5.42540 8.91499 Fully numerically integrated trajectory (using JPL 421 Ephemerides) values from STK/Astrogator (From Analytical Graphics, Inc.) Leg Stay Time (days) 1 Earth 2 0.0000 Mars Depart 5 Jan 2018 07:00:00.000 UTCG 20 Aug 2018 08:18:19.619 UTCG Mars Earth Arrive Flight Time (days) 20 Aug 2018 08:18:19.619 UTCG 227.05439374 21 May 2019 13:52:48.012 UTCG 274.23227306 Total Duration 501.2866668 Departure Arrival V Inf V peri C3 V Inf V peri C3 Leg (km/s) (km/s) (km 2 /s 2 ) (km/s) (km/s) (km 2 /s 2 ) 1 6.232 12.578 38.835 5.417 7.272 29.344 2 5.417 7.272 29.344 8.837 14.18 78.094 Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 7

Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 8

(4) Trans Mars Injection Burn (3)Low Earth Checkout and Deployment (9) Trans Earth Trajectory Mar s Motion Relative to Trajectory (10) Earth Reentry Sequence (1) Launch Fuel Supply? (2) Launch Human Crew (8) Mars Encounter Exit (11)Land on Earth (7) Mars Proximity Trajectory Events: Launch Fuel Supply: TMI - 1 Months? Launch Human Crew: TMI - < 2 Weeks Trans Mars Injection: TMI Mars Encounter Entrance: TMI + 8 Mo Mars Encounter Exit: TMI + 8 Mo Earth Reentry Sequence: TMI + 8 Mo Land on Earth: TMI + 17 Mo (5) Trans Mars Trajectory Phase (6) Mars Encounter Entrance Phases (Durations): Low Earth Checkout and Deployment: < 2 Weeks Trans Mars Trajectory: 8 Months Mars Proximity: ~ 24 hours Trans Earth Trajectory: 9 Months Earth Reentry Phase: 24 Hours Event Phase

Calendar Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18 May 18 Jun 18 Jul 18 Aug 18 Sep 18 Oct 18 Ground Network NEN/USN/TDRSS DSN/Other* DSN/Other MPT Phase LEO C&D Trans Mars Trajectory Trans Earth Trajectory Low Earth Orbit Phase: 1) Fuel Supply Launch? 2) Human Crew Launch 3) Crew & Fuel Rendezvous? 4) Systems Checkout 5) Inflatable Deployment 6) Trans Mars Injection Burn NEN begins to transition out DSN/Other/MRO/MAVEN Mars Periareion 20 Aug 2018 MRO 2005 Calendar Ground Network Phase Nov 18 Dec 18 Jan 19 Feb 19 Mar 19 Apr 19 May 19 DSN/Other** NEN/USN ERP Trans Earth Trajectory (Cont d) ** NEN begins to transition in Perihelion - 11 Mar 2019 Earth Reentry Phase: 1) Upper Stage Jettison 2) Inflatable Jettison 3) Entry Interface Attitude Alignment 4) Atmospheric Entry 5) Parachute Deployment 6) Land On Earth MAVEN - 2013

Trajectory Perspective Miles AU Black = Spacecraft distance from Earth (miles) Green = Spacecraft distance from Mars (miles) Red = Spacecraft distance from the Sun in Astronomical Units (AU)

Falcon Heavy Option Graphic courtesy SpaceX First flight scheduled for 2013 Man-rated design 53,000 kg to LEO 10,000 kg to Mars for this mission Free-return trajectory enables upper stage to stay attached for shielding Falcon Heavy Graphic courtesy SpaceX Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 12

Option 1: Launch 1 Atlas 552: includes 18.1 mt useable propellant Launch 2 Atlas 552: with 10.5 mt payload ULA Options Option 2: Launch 2 Atlas 552: with 10.5 mt payload Launch 2 Delta HLV: with 10.5 mt payload Transfer 12 mt of propellant Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 13

SLS - Orion as an Analytical Reference Point Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 14

Earth Reentry Overview Atmospheric reentry vehicles require thermal protection systems (TPS) because they are subjected to intense heating The level of the heating is dependent on: Vehicle shape Entry speed and flight trajectory Atmospheric composition TPS material composition & surface properties Reentry heating to the vehicle comes from two primary Sources Convective heating from both the flow of hot gas past the surface of the vehicle and catalytic chemical recombination reactions at the surface Radiation heating from the energetic shock layer in front of the vehicle Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 15

Looked at Aerocapture initially Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 16

Reentry Heating Parameters Magnitude of stagnation heating is dependent on a variety of parameters, including reentry speed (V), vehicle effective radius (R), and atmospheric density (ρ) q conv V 3 R 0.5 Convective Heating As reentry speed increases, both convective and radiation heating increase At high speeds, such as 14.2 Km/s, radiation heating can quickly dominate As the effective vehicle radius increases, R convective heating decreases, but radiation heating increases Reentry g-loading is a parameter we 2R are considering q rad V 8 1.2 R 0.5 Shock Radiation Heating Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 17 V

Flight Concept Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 18

Object Distance From Sun Mars Orbital Track Mars Flyby Spacecraft Trajectory Earth Orbital Track Venus Orbital Track Perihelion (Close to Venus Orbit*) *Venus is not present when the spacecraft is at perihelion

Solar Radiation Mars during the flyby is 708 W/m 2 (52% Earth) Closest approach is 2540 W/m 2 (188% of Earth levels) 3000 1.5 2500 1.25 2000 1 Solar Radiation (W/m2) 1500 0.75 Distance from Sun (AU) Solar Radiation Distance 1000 0.5 500 0.25 0 31-Dec-17 10-Apr-18 19-Jul-18 27-Oct-18 4-Feb-19 15-May-19 Mission Date 0 FISO 3 April, 2013 20

ECLSS Launch Mass Legend: Basis System Consumables + Packaging CR-2006-213694 /corrected to replace Biomass with additional packaged food Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 21

Environmental Control and Life Support Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 22

ECLSS Resources: 2 Person Crew for 501 Days Subsystem Mass 1 (kg) Vol 2 (m) 3 Peak 1 Power (W) Avg Power (W) Air 897 1.7 2,626 1,870 Water 2,235 5.1 529 193 Food 1,384 4.0 3 1,860 39 Thermal 479 1.0 300 99 Crew Waste 259 0.7 174 7 Human Accommodations 347 1.8 - - Basic System 2,470 6.6 5,189 2,109 Consumables 3,131 7.7 - - Total = 5,601 14.3 5,489 2,109 1 Mass and power estimates based on ANSI/AIAA G-020-1992, Guide for Estimating and Budgeting Weight and Power Contingencies For Spacecraft Systems 2 Volumes are total volume and do not account for packaging factors 3 Errata corrected from paper (estimated food volume is 4 m 3 ) Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 23

ECLSS Test Facility Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 24

Inspiration Mars Medical Team Interdisciplinary Team including Academic, Industry, and Government representation Specific Focus on Radiation, Microgravity and Behavioral Health Threats utilizing Personalized Medicine Astro-omeics Approach Tiered Approach involving candidate selection, crew training, as well as mission and post mission support utilizing the highest level of advanced health care delivery

Radiation Environment Risk Assessment Mission occurs during solar minimum Expert consensus: risk is manageable Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks Risk of Exposure-Induced Death 500-d Mars Flyby (GCR + SPEprob) Multiple dose mitigation strategies can be used to reduce the risk Upper stage & propellant residuals Water storage placement Crew selection Dietary/pharmaceuticals 26

Psychological and Behavioral Health 27

Inspiration Mars Inspire a sea change in the American Space Program Inspire our political leaders today to stop being timid - and fund a piloted Mars program that will get us to the surface. Address technical risks in human deep space exploration Demonstrate the feasibility of human missions to Mars Foster knowledge, experience and momentum for space exploration Validate the program of record Strengthen the U.S. position as a leader in exploration Inspire youth through science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education and motivation Public participation Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 28

Conclusion Completed initial conceptual feasibility study Ongoing development includes Schedule & Program Human Health and Radiation Launch (technical assessment) Spacecraft architecture ECLSS TPS assessment Trajectory optimization Expand interaction with NASA, aerospace industry, and academia Tito, MacCallum, Carrico, Loucks 29