Unique Aberration-Free IOL: A Vision that Patients

Similar documents
Not everyone can do this. Introducing RayOne with patented Lock & Roll TM technology for the smallest fully preloaded IOL incision

SEE BEYOND WITH FULLRANGE OPTICS. Developed by Hanita Lenses

IOL Types. Hazem Elbedewy. M.D., FRCS (Glasg.) Lecturer of Ophthalmology Tanta university

The design is distinctive. The outcomes are clear. Defocus tolerance 1 Glistening-free performance 1,2 Predictable outcomes 1

Long-term quality of vision is what every patient expects

Crystalens AO: Accommodating, Aberration-Free, Aspheric Y. Ralph Chu, MD Chu Vision Institute Bloomington, MN

NOW. Approved for NTIOL classification from CMS Available in Quar ter Diopter Powers. Accommodating. Aberration Free. Aspheric.

Clinical Evaluation 3-month Follow-up Report

THE ASPHERIC PRELOADED INJECTION

AT LISA tri 839MP and AT LISA tri toric 939MP from ZEISS The innovative trifocal IOL concept providing True Living Vision to more patients

NEW. AT LISA tri 839MP and AT LISA tri toric 939MP from ZEISS The innovative trifocal IOL concept providing True Living Vision to more patients

ROTATIONAL STABILITY MAKES THE DIFFERENCE

RayOne Hydrophobic IOL. New design. New standard MADE IN UK

day night convinced supreme contrast sensitivity THE IOL FOR DAY & NIGHT

*Simulated vision. **Individual results may vary and are not guaranteed. Visual Performance When It s Needed Most

Product Portfolio. Sulcoflex Pseudophakic Supplementary IOLs

Maximum Light Transmission. Pupil-independent Light Distribution. 3.75D Near Addition Improved Intermediate Vision

Improving Lifestyle Vision. with Small Aperture Optics

Causes of refractive error post premium IOL s 3/17/2015. Instruction course: Refining the Refractive Error After Premium IOL s.

Dr. Magda Rau Eye Clinic Cham, Germany

Glistening-Free Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL. Glistening-Free Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL

Visual Outcomes of Two Aspheric PCIOLs: Tecnis Z9000 versus Akreos AO

Clinical Update for Presbyopic Lens Options

Sulcoflex. For when perfection is the only option! Pseudophakic Sulcus Fixated Secondary IOLs. Sulcoflex Aspheric. Sulcoflex Toric

Aberrations Before and After Implantation of an Aspheric IOL

Product Portfolio. Sulcoflex Pseudophakic Supplementary IOLs. Your skill. Our vision.

PROGRESSIVE VISION WITHIN FULL ACCOMMODATIVE RANGE

Comparative Study Between the High Order Aberrations Before and After Cataract Surgery Using Two Different Types of IOLS

Clinical Evaluation 3-month Follow-up Report

HYDROPHILIC ACRYLIC ADVANCED POLYMER

Choosing the Proper Power for the IOL. Brannon Aden, MD Miles H. Friedlander, MD, FACS

Quality of Vision With Multifocal Progressive Diffractive Lens: Two-Year Follow-up

Technicians & Nurses Program

7 DO IT. A SAFER WAY TO TRIFOCALITY * : ELEVATED PHASE SHIFT (EPS) ** 7 DIFFRACTIVE RINGS FOR OPTIMAL LIGHT DISTRIBUTION AND LESS DISTURBANCE

Evolution of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

CONTENTS. HYDROPHILIC IOLs. Bi-Flex PIL-MA hydrophilic preloaded P / PY 677PT / PTY 677PMY 677PMTY. Bi-Flex HL...

NEW THE WORLD S FIRST AND ONLY SINUSOIDAL TRIFOCAL IOL

Accommodating IOL s History and Clinical Management

THE XTRAFOCUS IS AN ELEGANT SOLUTION TO COMPLEX CASES.

FEA of Prosthetic Lens Insertion During Cataract Surgery

HOYA aspherical IOL with ABC (Aspheric Balanced Curve) Design

The complete choice in refractive lens solutions

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire et Psychiatrique de Mons-Borinage. B-Flex Multifocal. Dr Emmanuel Van Acker Belgium

Raise your expectations. Deliver theirs.

Multifocal Progressive Diffractive Lens to Improve Light Distribuition and Avoid Light Loss: Two Years Clinical Results

Preloaded. PreciSAL. EZ Toric

Multifocal and Accommodative

OCULUS Pentacam AXL Always an Axial Length Ahead

Principles and clinical applications of ray-tracing aberrometry (Part II)

EXCHANGE. Financial Disclosure. Clinical pearls In advanced anterior segment surgery being able to do a IOL exchange is a must. Why Do an Exchange

Theoretical Considerations

Diffractive Optics. Multifocal Lenses. Correction of Pseudophakic Presbyopia with Multifocal IOLs. Basic Designs

Refractive Power / Corneal Analyzer. OPD-Scan III

Corneal Asphericity and Retinal Image Quality: A Case Study and Simulations

Intraocular lens Difficulties

PATIENT SELECTION THE RIGHT PATIENT UNDERPROMISE AND OVERDELIVER THE PERFECT SPECTACLE FREE TREATMENT. Desires Less Dependence on glasses

Treatment of Presbyopia during Crystalline Lens Surgery A Review

Special Publication: Ophthalmochirurgie Supplement 2/2009 (Original printed issue available in the German language)

The Miracle of Pi in Eye. Rajesh Khanna, MD

Ocular Scatter. Rayleigh Scattering

I N M A D E F R A N C E. Hydrophobic monofocal NEW QUALITY SAFETY STABILITY TECHNICAL BROCHURE

Wave Front Topography. ReSeeVit Evolution Topography Module for Modi Topographer

The Impact of New Generation Aspherical Soft Contact Lenses on Quality of Vision: A Comparison with Spherical Contact Lenses and Spectacle Correction

The Aberration-Free IOL:

Customized intraocular lenses

Forget Most Everything! The Surgical Management of Presbyopia 2/23/2016. Refraction vs. Diffraction. Presbyopic IOL s Patient Expectations

Retinal stray light originating from intraocular lenses and its effect on visual performance van der Mooren, Marie Huibert

COMPARISON OF THE MEDICONTUR 860FAB

József Győry. Veszprem, Hungary

4/2/2015. Bonnie An Henderson MD Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology Tufts University School of Medicine Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston

Choices and Vision. Jeffrey Koziol M.D. Thursday, December 6, 12

Comparison of higher order aberrations with spherical and aspheric IOLs compared to normal phakic eyes

University of Groningen. Young eyes for elderly people van Gaalen, Kim

10/25/2017. Financial Disclosures. Do your patients complain of? Are you frustrated by remake after remake? What is wavefront error (WFE)?

Choices and Vision. Jeffrey Koziol M.D. Friday, December 7, 12

What is Wavefront Aberration? Custom Contact Lenses For Vision Improvement Are They Feasible In A Disposable World?

Corporate Perspective Alcon Unanswered Technical Challenges that Still Need to be Overcome

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2010/16

ASPIRA PUBLICATION LIST

Update on Aspheric IOL Technology

Sulcoflex Pseudophakic Supplementary IOLs

AHEAD Superior technology, thoughtfully designed with you in mind for an intelligent approach to cataract surgery.

Objective and subjective outcomes in comparing three different aspheric intraocular lens implants with their spherical counterparts

Optical Path Difference Scanning System OPD-Scan II ARK-10000

The Dysphotopsia Mystery. John J. Bussa, M.D.

The Blueprint for Improved Image Quality

Corneal Mapping over the Contact Lens. Challenge: Getting the Most out of Soft Contact Lens Multifocals

Assessing Visual Quality With the Point Spread Function Using the NIDEK OPD-Scan II

Wide Diopter Range and Different Haptic Platforms

University of Groningen. Young eyes for elderly people van Gaalen, Kim

Soft CL Multifocals Design and Fitting. Soft Multifocal Lens Designs. Issues Surrounding Multifocals. Blur Interpretation. Simultaneous Vision Designs

Sutureless, Glueless, Scleral Fixation of Single-Piece and Toric Intraocular Lens: A Novel Technique

IOL Review and FLACS Update

Advanced Technology IOLs


Optical Characteristics of Next Generation Dual Optic IOL

Sirius TOMOGRAPH AND CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHER

THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS Dual-Scheimpflug and Placido Reaching a new level in refractive screening

Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity, Higher- Order Aberrations and Subjective Visual Function after Different Aspheric Intraocular Lenses Implantation

Multifocal Intraocular Lenses for the Treatment of Presbyopia: Benefits and Side-effects

Transcription:

Unique Aberration-Free IOL: A Vision that Patients Can Appreciate

An Aspheric Optic for Improved Quality of Vision n Traditional spherical IOLs create Bilateral implantation study spherical aberration and reduce contrast sensitivity High Order Aberrations at months: 6mm pupil n With, unique aspheric 2. anterior and posterior surfaces are aberration neutral 1.8 1.6 n The result? Clinical outcomes.86 Total HOA 1.4 demonstrate a reduction in overall higher order aberrations 1 coma.7 1.2 SA 1. n Contrast sensitivity under photopic.6.8 or mesopic lighting conditions is similar to silicone aspheric aberrated IOL2.52.6.4.5.2.5. Akreos Adapt (n=2) Akreos Adapt AO (n=2) G. Lofoco. Influence of Aspheric and Spherical IOLs on Higher-Order Aberrations and Functional Vision: Results of a Comparative Multi-center Study. ASCRS 26. 1 Bilateral implantation study Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity: cd/m2 12 12 1 1 Contrast Sensitivity Contrast Sensitivity Photopic Contrast Sensitivity: 85 cd/m2 8 6 4 6 4 2 2 1,5 6 12 18 1,5 Spatial Frequency (CPD) (n=8) 2 8 6 12 18 Spatial Frequency (CPD) Silicone Aspheric Aberrated IOL (n=8) B. Johansson et al. Swedish multi-center study to compare the optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optic (AO) IOL and the Tecnis Z9. ASCRS 26. 2

Uniform Power Designed to Work in Every Eye n No eye is optically perfect The Natural Phakic Eye n Constant power from centre to edge helps to improve vision by providing consistent power across the entire optic surface Iris n is designed to provide OPTICAL AXIS (Cornea to Lens) predictable, repeatable refractive outcomes for all cataract patients, regardless of corneal shape, pupil size, as well as pupil or capsular bag centration VISUAL AXIS (Object to Fovea) Fovea Lens n Clinical results show excellent high Retina and low contrast BCVA comparable to a middle-age phakic eye All axes in the eye are not perfectly aligned and no two eyes are the same shape so you need IOLs that work with imperfect conditions. BCVA compared to phakic eyes. 2/4..2 2/2.2.1 2/25.1 2/4 patients (mean age: 7-year-old) patients (mean age: 7-year-old) 2/2 2/25 -.1 IogMar IogMar 6 months 2/2 Normal phakic population (mean age: 4-year-old) 6 months 1 year -.1 2/16 -.2 2/2 Normal phakic population (mean age: 4-year-old) 2/16 -.2 High Contrast (n=5) 1 year Low Contrast (n=5) V. Pfeifer. Clinical evaluation of a new aspheric IOL: the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics (AO). Data from a pilot study at six months follow up. ASCRS 26.

Aberration-Free Design Helps to Enhance Depth of Field n The phakic eye has some natural level of positive spherical aberration n Positive spherical aberration helps the phakic eye achieve better depth of field n maintains the natural, positive spherical aberrations compared to aspheric, aberrated IOLs 2 (top figure) n With its aberration-free design, helps to significantly improve depth of field in comparison to an aspheric aberrated IOL2 (bottom figure) Natural Functionality Bilateral implantation study Spherical Aberrations Depth of focus in intermediate vision 1 Silicone Aspheric Aberrated IOL,8 RMS,6,4,2 -.2 Z4 4mm Z4 4,5mm Corneal Peripheral rays Mean Depth of Field4 p=, Corneal Medium rays Number of patients Z4 5mm Silicone Aspheric Aberrated IOL.85 Dpt.71 Dpt 74 74 Corneal Central rays In intermediate vision more distant objects are seen through central corneal rays whereas closer objects are seen through peripheral corneal rays. 4 2. Johansson et al. Swedish multi-centre study to compare the optical performance of B the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optic (AO) IOL and the Tecnis Z9. ASCRS 26. Measured with the Strehl ratio as described by S. Marcos et al. Implantation of Spherical and Aspheric IOLs. Journal of Refractive Surgery. May June 25; 21:1 1. 4

A Visual Difference Patients Appreciate n A masked, subjective patient n Patients had no way of knowing assessment following cataract surgery showed that twice as many patients prefer the vision in their eye2 (left figure) which lens was implanted in their eyes n Patients also reported fewer visual disturbances in their eye compared to the silicone aspheric aberrated IOL eye2 (right figure) Bilateral implantation study: double-masked questionnaire Any preference for one eye Less dysphotopsia in one eye 4 4 2 2 28% 1 Silicone Aspheric Aberrated IOL 14% 1 No difference 58% (n=8) 2 % Silicone Aspheric Aberrated IOL 11% No difference 56% (n=55) B. Johansson et al. Swedish multi-centre study to compare the optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optic (AO) IOL and the Tecnis Z9. ASCRS 26. 5

For Optimised Effectiveness against PCO n The unique Square-Edge Technology and a 6 posterior barrier reduce cell migration following implantation n EPCO analysis shows just how effective the design is in blocking cell growth n Results are comparable to the best performing acrylic IOLs5 Akreos Advanced Optics EPCO Scores @ months @ 6 months @ 12 months 6mm optic area.48.48.48 mm central area.7.8.12 (n=42) (n=48) (n=41) EPCO Scores @ 12 months Limit at which PCO does not require Nd:Yag capsulotomy* One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Lens5.25.25.2.2.15.15.1.1.5.48.114.9.5.12 6mm optic area (n=41) mm central area (n=41) 6mm optic area (n=12) mm central area (n=12) * Nd:Yag capsulotomy usually performed beyond.5 to 1., depending on PCO location and patient s complaint. 5 V. Pfeifer. Clinical evaluation of a new aspheric IOL: the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics (AO). Data from a pilot study at six months follow up. ASCRS 26. Data on file. 6

Efficient Implantation through an Unenlarged Phaco Incision n The Akreos Single-Use Insertion Device enables implantation of the through a 2.8mm phaco incision n Improved plunger design provides symmetrical unfolding and easier placement of the lead haptics into the capsular bag n The flat loading, single-hand injection makes quick work of lens implantation Single-Use Lens Delivery System Akreos Single-Use Insertion Device AI-28B 1. Place the lens flat in to the loading deck 2. Close the injector and fit the tip 7. Advance the plunger and deliver the lens

Akreos Advanced Optics System Model: Adapt AO DIOPTER RANGE:. through 9. in 1. Dpt MATERIAL: 26% acrylic material, 1. through. in.5 Dpt UV absorber, Refractive index: 1.458 (hydrated) LENS CONSTANTS: OPTIC: A-Constant* 118. 118. (SRK/T) Biconvex aspheric anterior and posterior, Optic body: 6mm ACD* 4.96 5.18 Surgeon Factor* 1.22 1.4 HAPTICS: ORDER CODES: One-piece, º angulation Lens in plastic vial: ADAPTAOP or ADAPTAOTP OVERALL DIAMETER: 11.mm from. to 15. Dpt 1.7mm from 15.5 to 22. Dpt Applanation Immersion A-scan A-scan or IOL Master* Injector: AI-28B 1.5mm from 22.5 to. Dpt Belgium/Luxembourg Tel: +2 28 82 4 Fax: +2 28 82 59 Germany/ Switzerland/Austria Tel: +49 9 541 Fax: +49 9 547 Portugal Tel: +51 88 2 178 Fax: +51 88 2 179 Emerging Markets Tel: + 4 67 12 Fax: + 4 67 12 2 Italy Tel: +9 29 148 851 Spain Netherlands France Tel: + 4 67 12 Fax: + 4 67 12 1 Tel: +1 2 6554555 Fax: +1 2 655 464 Tel: +4 92 81 1 Fax: +4 92 25 1 South Africa Tel: +46 8 616 95 Fax: +46 8 669 86 2 Tel: +27 11 259 26 Fax: +27 11 259 265 United Kingdom Tel: +44 2 8781 Fax: +44 2 8781 1 Nordic Countries For information or Customer Service please contact your local representative or distributor. Bausch & Lomb European Office, Bausch + Lomb House, 16 114 London Road, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey KT2 6TN, UK. Tel: +44 2 8781 55 Fax: +44 2 8781 299 www.bauschsurgical.com 211 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated / March211 / version 2 / / denote trademarks of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated * A-Constant, ACD and Surgeon Factor are estimates only. Latest update March 211. It is recommended that each surgeon develop his or her own values.