Calibrating the Cavity Voltage. Presentation of an idea

Similar documents
Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

FLASH at DESY. FLASH. Free-Electron Laser in Hamburg. The first soft X-ray FEL operating two undulator beamlines simultaneously

MAX II RF system 100 MHz technology Lars Malmgren 10th ESLS RF Meeting Dortmund September 27-28, 2006

Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery?

FLASH Operation at DESY From a Test Accelerator to a User Facility

FLASH II. FLASH II: a second undulator line and future test bed for FEL development.

O. Napoly LC02, SLAC, Feb. 5, Higher Order Modes Measurements

Using Higher Order Modes in the Superconducting TESLA Cavities for Diagnostics at DESY

Superstructures; First Cold Test and Future Applications

Borut Baricevic. Libera LLRF. 17 September 2009

INSTALLATION AND FIRST COMMISSIONING OF THE LLRF SYSTEM

Bioimaging of cells and tissues using accelerator-based sources

Demonstration of exponential growth and saturation at VUV wavelengths at the TESLA Test Facility Free-Electron Laser. P. Castro for the TTF-FEL team

RF Design of Normal Conducting Deflecting Cavity

PETRA-III 500 MHz Cavity

SwissFEL Design and Status

The ILC Accelerator Complex

Superconducting RF System. Heung-Sik Kang

J. Jacob: Status of the ESRF RF upgrade

Physics Requirements Document Document Title: SCRF 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Document Number: LCLSII-4.1-PR-0146-R0 Page 1 of 7

Maurizio Vretenar Linac4 Project Leader EuCARD-2 Coordinator

FAST RF KICKER DESIGN

Project of RF System for 2.2 GeV Electron Storage Ring Zelenograd SR Source.

3 General layout of the XFEL Facility

HIGHER ORDER MODES FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS IN THIRD HARMONIC 3.9 GHZ ACCELERATING MODULES *

Circumference 187 m (bending radius = 8.66 m)

Jørgen S. Nielsen Institute for Storage Ring Facilities, Aarhus, University of Aarhus Denmark

A Design of a 3rd Harmonic Cavity for the TTF 2 Photoinjector

FLASH II: an Overview

The TESLA Linear Collider. Winfried Decking (DESY) for the TESLA Collaboration

PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT

Beam Diagnostics, Low Level RF and Feedback for Room Temperature FELs. Josef Frisch Pohang, March 14, 2011

Behavior of the TTF2 RF Gun with long pulses and high repetition rates

A Synchrotron Phase Detector for the Fermilab Booster

2008 JINST 3 S The RF systems and beam feedback. Chapter Introduction

The Australian Synchrotron. Crowbar Less High Voltage Power Supplies (HVPS) 7th ESLS RF meeting, Oct Karl Zingre RF Engineer

Field Stability Issue for Normal Conducting Cavity under Beam Loading

Booster High-level RF Frequency Tracking Improvement Via the Bias-Curve Optimization

H. Weise, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany for the XFEL Group

Tutorial on Design of RF system for Indus Accelerator. Maherdra Lad Head, Radio Frequency Systems Division RRCAT, Indore

A 3 GHz SRF reduced-β Cavity for the S-DALINAC

Normal-conducting high-gradient rf systems

REVIEW OF HIGH POWER CW COUPLERS FOR SC CAVITIES. S. Belomestnykh

State of the Art in RF Control

Bunch-by-Bunch Broadband Feedback for the ESRF

Software Design Specification for LLRF Applications at FLASH Version 1.0 Prepared by Zheqiao Geng MSK, DESY Nov. 16, 2009

Performance of the Prototype NLC RF Phase and Timing Distribution System *

Third Harmonic Superconducting passive cavities in ELETTRA and SLS

Dark current Monitor for the European XFEL D. Lipka, W. Kleen, J. Lund-Nielsen, D. Nölle, S. Vilcins, V. Vogel; DESY Hamburg

Cavity Field Control - Feedback Performance and Stability Analysis. LLRF Lecture Part3.2 S. Simrock, Z. Geng DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Beam Instability Investigations at DELTA

STABILITY CONSIDERATIONS

LC Technology Hans Weise / DESY

Current Industrial SRF Capabilities and Future Plans

1.5 GHz Cavity design for the Clic Damping Ring and as Active Third Harmonic cavity for ALBA.

FLASH 2. FEL seminar. Charge: 0.5 nc. Juliane Rönsch-Schulenburg Overview of FLASH 2 Hamburg,

SRF FOR FUTURE CIRCULAR COLLIDERS

Acceleration of High-Intensity Protons in the J-PARC Synchrotrons. KEK/J-PARC M. Yoshii

Frank Schmidt-Föhre, DESY

THz Pump Beam for LCLS. Henrik Loos. LCLS Hard X-Ray Upgrade Workshop July 29-31, 2009

Attosecond Diagnostics of Muti GeV Electron Beams Using W Band Deflectors

Grounding for EMC at the European XFEL

Cavity Field Control - RF Field Controller. LLRF Lecture Part3.3 S. Simrock, Z. Geng DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Project X Cavity RF and mechanical design. T. Khabiboulline, FNAL/TD/SRF

For my parents

X-Ray Detection Using SOI Monolithic Sensors at a Compact High-Brightness X-Ray Source Based on Inverse Compton Scattering

Short-Pulse X-ray at the Advanced Photon Source Overview

Third Harmonic Cavity Status

FLASH performance after the upgrade. Josef Feldhaus

FLASH rf gun. beam generated within the (1.3 GHz) RF gun by a laser. filling time: typical 55 μs. flat top time: up to 800 μs

ALICE SRF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE A. Wheelhouse ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory

Introduction to Synchrotron Radio Frequency System

Engineering Challenges and Solutions for MeRHIC. Andrew Burrill for the MeRHIC Team

ERLP Status. Mike Dykes

Status of the HOM Damped Cavity Project

Status, perspectives, and lessons from FLASH and European XFEL

CHARACTERIZATION OF BUTTON AND STRIPLINE BEAM POSITION MONITORS AT FLASH. Summer Student Programme 2007 DESY- Hamburg.

Dark Current Kicker Studies at FLASH

ELECTRON BEAM DIAGNOSTICS AND FEEDBACK FOR THE LCLS-II*

JUAS 2018 LINACS. Jean-Baptiste Lallement, Veliko Dimov BE/ABP CERN.

International Technology Recommendation Panel. X-Band Linear Collider Path to the Future. RF System Overview. Chris Adolphsen

Energy Recovering Linac Issues

LLRF Operation and Performance of the European XFEL. An overview

Simulation of Multibunch Longitudinal Instabilities

RF Cavity Design. Erk Jensen CERN BE/RF. CERN Accelerator School Accelerator Physics (Intermediate level) Darmstadt 2009

Software Requirements Specification for LLRF Applications at FLASH Version 1.0 Prepared by Zheqiao Geng MSK, DESY Nov. 06, 2009

Room Temperature High Repetition Rate RF Structures for Light Sources

The HOM measurement of a TESLA cavity (Z84) for HOM-BPM and cavity alignment

FLASH Upgrade. Decrease wavelength and/or increase brilliance

Synchronization Overview

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project. NLC Update. CLIC Group. CERN September D. L. Burke SLAC

Vision for the Future: BESSY VSR A Variable Bunch Length Storage Ring

High acceleration gradient. Critical applications: Linear colliders e.g. ILC X-ray FELs e.g. DESY XFEL

Detailed Design Report

New apparatus for precise synchronous phase shift measurements in storage rings 1

Positron Beam Position Measurement for a Beam Containing Both Positrons and Electrons *

Drive Beam Photo-injector Option for the CTF3 Nominal Phase

Advance on High Power Couplers for SC Accelerators

Coherent Synchrotron Radiation in the ANKA Storage Ring

Status of superconducting module development suitable for cw operation: ELBE cryostats

Transcription:

Calibrating the Cavity Voltage. Presentation of an idea Stefan Wilke, DESY MHF-e 21st ESLS rf meeting Kraków, 15th/16th nov 2017

Accelerators at DESY. linear and circular Page 2

Accelerators at DESY. linear and circular Greetings from Elbphilharmonie across the city of Hamburg to XFEL in august 2017 Page 3

Accelerators at DESY. linear and circular XFEL european project 11 (12) countries ca. 1.22 billion EUR (D: 58%, RU: 27%) since 2009 3.4 km tunnel length 1.3 GHz pulsed rf 24 klystrons 768 sc 9 cell niob cavities in 96 cryo modules (1.7 km accelerator) energy goal: 17.5 GeV (now: 14.3 GeV) up to 27 000 flashes per second wavelengths: 4.7 to 0.05 nm Page 4

Accelerators at DESY. PETRA III at DESY, Hamburg Main parameters: l = 2304 m beam energy = 6.08 GeV beam current: 100 ma (4.8 E12 e - ), Top Up emittance (hor.) = 1 nmrad energy loss: ca. 5 MeV per turn (ca. 65 % from damping wigglers) 20 undulators fill pattern: timing mode : 40 bunches, 192 ns gap, 2.50 ma per bunch 60 bunches, 128 ns gap, 1.66 ma per bunch continuous mode: 480 bunches, 16 ns gap, 0.21 ma per bunch 960 bunches, 8 ns gap, 0.10 ma per bunch availability: ca. 97 % (2017), MTBF: ca. 40 h (2017) Page 5

rf system at PETRA III. PETRA III at DESY, Hamburg rf parameters frequency: 499.664 MHz harmonic number: 3840 20 MV cavity voltage 12 7 cell nc cavities rf power: up to 4 800 kw (2 Thales and 2 Philips klystrons) Page 6

calibrating the voltage. by using the synchrotron frequency euc 2π E α h E U c / V sum (geom.) of 12 peak cavity voltage (PETRA: 20 MV) f s / Hz synchrotron frequency (PETRA: ca. 6.1 khz) f 0 / Hz revolution frequency (PETRA: 130120.91 Hz) h harmonic number (PETRA: 3840) α momentum compaction factor (PETRA: 0.001127) E 0 / ev energy loss per turn (PETRA: ca. 5 MeV) E / ev beam energy (PETRA: 6.083 GeV) rf frequency (PETRA: 499664310 Hz) synchronous phase about 14.3 deg But we observe (here in 40 bunch mode) a big change (5 %) of the synchrotron frequency (blue) when the beam current (black) decreased. Explanation? So we were looking for different methods. And we want to calibrate the voltage of each cavity separated. Page 7

the cavity as a triangle. vector diagram of cavity voltage Im U conditions: Cavity is tuned coupler beam synchronous phase psi: cavity detuning angle phi: accelerating voltage: Re U Page 8

the idea. proposed by Michael Ebert (DESY, MHF-e) We want to calibrate the cavity voltage without using the generator power to increase the accuracy. This method requires only the knowledge of beam current, shunt impedance and loaded quality factor of the cavity. This calibration process makes use of blanking the accelerator rf-power for few milliseconds in order to dump the beam current. The transient of the cavity-voltage is measured at three characteristic points: 1.) Just before the rf-power is blanked (cavity voltage). 2.) Shortly after the rf is blanked, but the beam current is still unaffected (beam induced voltage). 3.) Shortly after the beam is lost and the rf is recovered (generator induced voltage). Page 9

measure the three sides of the triangle. by a transient recorder during a beam dump voltage of 6 cavities beam dump The beam is dumped by switching off the rf for 5 ms. In this example the reason for the dump was a trip of a magnet power supply. A transient recorder saves 800 ms of data. Here we see the (tentative calibrated) voltages of 6 cavities (one transmitter) and the beam current. The first side of our triangle. Let s zoom in... 800 ms Page 10

measure the three sides of the triangle. by a transient recorder during a beam dump Looking on the measurement of the cavity voltage after the beam is gone and the rf ist back again we see the generator induced voltage: The next side of our triangle. Let s zoom in more... beam rf off for 5 ms Page 11

measure the three sides of the triangle. by a transient recorder during a beam dump beam Looking on the measurement of the cavity voltage during the rf is off but the beam is still in the machine we see in each cavity the beam induced voltage: We took the maximum after a short time (ca. 30 µs) of changing the charge in the cavity and before the bunch is debunched and lost. The last side of our triangle. Page 12

the next steps. proposed by Michael Ebert (DESY, MHF-e) From the arbitrary calibrated measured values a triangle can be constructed and the detuning-angle of the cavity can be calculated. By the knowledge of the detuning-angle the beam induced voltage can be calculated. Since the beam-induced voltage forms one side of a triangle, the remaining two sides which represents generator induced voltage and cavity voltage can also be calculated. Page 13

constructing the triangle. calculating and calibrating 1. Calculating the cavity detuning angle phi by using the law of cosines: Im U ϕ = arccos U 2 C + U 2 U 2 G C U U G 2 B All three sides coming from the same pick up do have the same error. So there is no effect to phi. Example (Cavity PE_SR_Cy2): : 2.051 E06 V : 1.916 E06 V : 1.025 E06 V = 29.7 deg Re U Page 14

calibrating. calculating and calibrating 2. Calculating the beam induced voltage: U B R 2 QL I cosϕ Q = B We only need R/Q, beam current and the loaded : R/Q for our 7-cell cavities was calculated to 845 Ohm at TU-Darmstadt (TEMF) in april 2016 in a high detailed CST-MWS-calculation, including plungers, input coupler and doorknob. Older MAFIA calculations shows 856 Ohm. Precision of measurement is about 1-2% (less in 40 bunch mode) was specified several times by band width measurements Example (Cavity PE_SR_Cy2): : 7247 U B = 2 845Ω 7247 100mA cos 29.7 = 1. 064MV originally 1.025 E06 V, so we had to correct the calibrating factor for that pick up by 1.038 Page 15

more capabilities. It is even possible to calculate the cavity phasing and the forward and reverse coupler power of the cavity. The experiences at PETRA-III shows that the accuracy of this calibrating method is comparable to those from directional coupler measurements or calorimetric power measurements. By averaging the calibration data of many beam dumps the accuracy can be increased. The presented method is potentially well suited for automated calibration. For example, calibration data could be generated automatically for each beam dump. Page 16

Thank you for your attention. dziękuję bardzo! Page 17