REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS. Agenda Item: No. 4. No. 7C-1

Similar documents
CONFEDERATION LINE PRESENTATION TO RPIC CONFERENCE

Public Art Mural Packet

PERCENT FOR ART GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 30 PUBLIC ART. Article I. In General

The Forestville/ Goodwood Tram Overpass Murals Project (Good Forest Murals) 1 PROJECT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Making It Your Own A PUBLIC ART POLICY AND PLANNING TEMPLATE. Arts North West Creative Opportunities 2012

DESIGN OF ART TREATMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL GLASS ELEMENTS AT DOWNTOWN BERKELEY BART PLAZA

MUNICIPALITY OF SIOUX LOOKOUT. Policy Manual POLICY REVIEW DATE NO. OF PAGES REVISIONS ADMINISTERED BY. Economic Development Office

PUBLIC ART SOSIP DRAFT OF JUNE 24.

MINUTES METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2008

Public Art Accession, Selection Criteria and Gift Policy

Public Art Network Best Practice Goals and Guidelines

Item 10F 1 of 87

EL MONTE STATION Call to Artists: Four Artist Opportunities

Exhibit A Project Identification. Exhibit B Project Charter / Project Intent. Exhibit C Project Scope. Exhibit C Project Schedule

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT:

CALL TO ARTISTS Tacoma Murals Project Lead Artist Roster. Application Deadline: March 28, 2014, midnight

Art in Public Spaces Policy. City of Burlington

PERCENT FOR ART PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

Public School Facilities Element

Minutes NASHVILLE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING. February 23, 2017

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ARTWORK PURCHASES

[PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

ITEM No.7- E MOTION. August 28, 2013ak

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

City of Suwanee Public Art Initiative Public Art Ordinance Guide for Developers

City of Oshawa Public Art Policy

Customer Service, Operations and Security Committee. Action Item III-A. May 11, 2017

CALL FOR ARTISTS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

PUBLIC ART PROGRAM Guidelines for Site Plan Projects

TOWN OF MORAGA ART IN PUBLIC SPACES POLICY

CORPORATE COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM XXIV OCTOBER 22, 2013

MINUTES OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 AT 4 P.M. The Metropolitan Planning Organization met on

ARTIST DESIGNED MURAL GUIDELINES

CITY OF LOVELAND VISUAL ARTS COMMISSION ACQUISITION POLICY

THE CHALLENGE OF PUBLIC ART EVALUATION: LESSONS FROM TWO ARLINGTON CASE STUDIES

Intellectual Property

MONET AVENUE, TILE BOLLARDS

Memorandum. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE:

Canadian Clay & Glass Gallery. Strategic Plan

CHAPTER 3. Public Schools Facility Element

Maintenance of Traffic sequence of operations including any phasing and detour maps;

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Honorable Members of the Budget and Finance Committee Honorable Members of the Arts, Parks, Health, Aging and River Committee

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the city commission created the historic district. signage task force under Resolution Number ; and

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Town of Los Altos Hills Art in Public Places Committee and Policy

SUBJECT^REPLACEMENT MEMORANDUM REGARDING CITY COUNCIL COMMITTfeES^BdARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENTS

Frequently Asked Questions 2016 UTILITY BOX ART REPAINTING PROJECT

Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol

November 28, Nol Director, Arts, Culture and Heritage Services 01

Architectural Design Process

Graffiti Management Strategy Update

Preparing for an Uncertain Future:

This Call for Qualifications does not require the preparation of a design proposal.

PALMETTO 800 History Project Cost

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

SAN JUAN ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT

City of Coral Gables Art in Public Places Program: Funding, Goals and Implementation Guidelines

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Charter of the Regional Technical Forum Policy Advisory Committee

PDXScholar. Portland State University. Metro (Or.) Regional Transportation Council (Wash.) Recommended Citation

COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. July 31, :00 PM. Commissioners Chamber

City of St. Petersburg Planning & Visioning Commission October 11, 2011

Report by Customer Service and Operations Committee (A) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Sec Radio, television, satellite dish and communications antennas and towers.

6.05 acres acres Single-family attached

Planning and Zoning Application & Checklist

BUS RAPID TRANSIT FOURTH PLAIN BLVD

DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS City of Los Angeles

Union Station Tunnel Overall DBE Goal Calculation

University of Houston System. System-wide Public Art Committee (SPAC) Operating Procedures Manual

Public Art Plan for Ripley s Aquarium of Canada 301 Front Street West, Toronto, Ontario

WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305

Public Call to Artists for Expressions of Interest Newton Recreation Centre Glass Curtain Wall Design for glass frit application

MIAMI BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES GUIDELINES

AMES INDUSTRIAL PARK AND OFFICE PLAZA

Lakewood, Ohio July 18, 2016

Northwest Rail Corridor Update

Adopted March 18, 2008 (Ordinance 08-19) Amended October 21, 2008

UNCLSSIIEDGAOCEO 82 17

DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION

MINUTES MALIBU PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 2018 MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 3:30 F.M.

(4) The location and design of schools so that they serve as community and neighborhood focal points; and

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS

MURAL GUIDELINES. Design and Review Criteria for Murals

City of Greater Sudbury Radio-communication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems Public Consultation Protocol

Pohlcla Coslelanos Anthony Plrozzl, Jr. Edward R. Renwick. Vice President

Metro Parks Tacoma Public Art Plan

NEWS AND NOTES: New Chargers Stadium Likely to Cost More than $725 Million

Foreword. Everybody has a budget but excellence and value can be found at any level when you know where to look. That search is what drives me.

Designer s NOTEBOOK DESIGN ECONOMY, PART 3

The Tri-State Transit Authority

East Lansing Urban Mural Project Crack Art Guidelines and Application

City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department UDRB SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST

DIA ART & CULTURE PROGRAM PUBLIC ART POLICY

Call for Clallam County Professional Artists Port Angeles Waterfront Design Team Artist Opportunity

Before (see graffiti at bottom)

PROGRAMMING SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. room) Scalable bubble diagrams schedules describing programmatic

Council Communication May 17, 2016, Business Meeting

Transcription:

REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 98-1 BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS Meeting: PGA Committee Board of Directors Date: 1/16/98 1/22/98 Agenda Item: No. 4 No. 7C-1 Staff Contact: Barbara Dougherty, Communications Manager Phone: 206-684-1357 ACTION: Board approval of Resolution No. 98-1, establishing program guidelines for Sound Transit Art and adopting an art budget policy. BACKGROUND: In Motion No. 40, adopted September 11, 1997 (copy attached) the Board committed to the integration of public art in the implementation of the Sound Transit system. Staff was directed to develop a master plan for art, establish an art advisory group, and prepare a resolution for adoption of an art budget. RELEVANT BOARD POLICIES AND PREVIOUS ACTIONS TAKEN: Adoption of Sound Move (May 31, 1996) Adoption of 1998 Budget (December 11, 1997) Adoption of Motion 40 (~e~tember 11, 1997) KEY FEATURES: Authorizes the initiation of Sound Transit Art (START) Recognizes a wide range of opportunities for art within the Sound Transit system, from discrete artworks to artistic enhancements to functional elements. Commits to having artists work with the preliminary and final design teams on the development of the project design and on the integration of art into the system as a whole. Authorizes the establishment of a public art advisory task force to work with staff, consisting of representatives from each of the jurisdictions in which Sound Transit facilities will be built. Establishes a policy for calculating the art budget as 1 % of capital construction costs, excluding the cost of tunneling. ' FUNDING: Sound Transit Art would not result in an addition to the budget for Sound Move, rather it would allocate 1 % of the existing construction budget (exclusive of tunneling) for art. The distribution of construction budget to the subareas will be unchanged. Administration of the art program would be funded from the 1 % allocation and assigned to the Communications and Marketing Division where it would become an element of community involvement In 1998, it is intended that the art program be administered through an agreement for part-time professional services with King County. The 1999 budget would include an FTE to fully administer the program.

ALTERNATIVES: Establish another methodology for calculating the art budget and alternative guidelines for implementation of the art program. Several other formulas for calculating a public art budget were considered. Examples include: 1% applied to station costs only; 1% of station costs plus.5% of visible and accessible nonstation costs;.5% of all construction costs. The formula recommended was chosen because it provides funding for art throughout the system, not just in stations; is consistent with local practices; and is straightforward and easy to explain. CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY: The Board has committed to involving artists in the design of transit facilities and public spaces. The design phase has begun, and it is important to involve artists as soon as possible. Some local jurisdictions that have public art programs are eager to know what the Sound Transit art program will be so that efforts may be coordinated. One consequence of delaying action is that opportunities for integrating art and artistic enhancements will be missed. FIRST STEPS: The following steps would be taken in the first half of 1998 to initiate Sound Transit Art: Board approval of art program guidelines Convene Public Art Advisory Task Force Issue RFQ for lead design team artists Develop Sound Transit artist services contracts Convene selection panel to establish pool of qualified design team artists Consultants and communities select design team artists from pre-qualified pool Artists begin working with design teams and communities

STALT SOUND TRANSIT ART PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND BUDGET POLICY I. INTRODUCTION It has long been recognized that the sensitive use of art and design in transit systems gives vibrancy to public spaces and presents an image of the local culture and architectural heritage. But more recently the power of art as a tool in establishing relationships with the community has been recognized. The artistic processes and review procedures of public art give citizens an avenue for participation in the project process. By becoming invested in a project, the community works toward implementing rather than opposing it. Through this process, the community also develops a sense of ownership and pride that can carry over beyond design and construction and make them partners in maintaining the facility. Just as Sound Transit is building a regional transit system to link the communities of this region, it can structure a public art program that enhances these linkages. @ A. Federal Policy Federal Transit Administration policy Circular 9400. IA encourages including art in mass transit projects: "The visual quality of the nation's mass transit systems has a profound impact on transit patrons and the community at large. Mass transit systems should be positive symbols for cities, attracting local riders, tourists, and the attention of decision-makers for national and international events. Good design and art can improve the appearance and safety of a facility, give vibrancy to its public spaces, and make patrons feel welcome. Good design and art will also contribute to the goal that transit facilities help to create livable communities." B. National Examples National examples of successful transit art programs include: Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Metro-Dade Transit Authority Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority King County Metro

C. Adopted Policy On September 11, 1997 in Motion 40 the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority made a commitment to the integration of public art in the Sound Transit system. The Motion states: Implementation of the Sound Transit system will include works of art that contribute to a positive experience for system users and affected communities. Artists will participate in the design of transit facilities and public spaces to maximize the opportunities for integrating art into construction. Affected communities will be involved in decisions regarding where and what type of art is appropriate in their communities, and in the selection of artists to execute the artwork. In order to carry out the policy adopted by the Board and to initiate the Sound Transit art program - STALT, the following guidelines are established. 11. OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART Transit agencies in this country have twenty years' experience in developing and refining art programs. Research into this experience reveals a wide range of ways in which art has contributed to enhancing the everyday act of commuting. Discrete artworks that celebrate the history, culture and people of the region are important and will be included in Sound Transit. However, the integration of art and architecture is essential because concerns regarding safety, operations, maintenance, vandalism, and pedestrian flow often preclude many of the opportunities for discrete art objects. In addition, many functional aspects of a transit system can be transformed and enlivened by the application of art and artistic ideas. Following is a list of selected components that will be considered as possibilities for art or artistic enhancement. A. Stations, P&R's, Transit Centers 1. Canopy/rooflcolumn design 2. Paving - platform, parking, crosswalks 3. Wall-vertical materials-finishes 4. Lighting - station or site. Attachments to standard light poles 5. Windscreens 6. Landscaping, stormwater design, artwork integrated into landscaping 7. Fencing 8. Bicycle rackslstorage 9. Seating 10. Railings 1 1. Kiosks 12. Signage - design, attachments, additions 13. Trash receptacles 14. Site-specific, free-standing artwork that serves as marker or community identifier 15. Clocks 16. Tree grates 17. Community connections 18. Art on shelter surfaces, i.e. paint, tile, terrazzo, metal

19. Art in shelter glass, i.e. sandblasting, placement of artwork on translucent film between two panes of glass 20. Attachments to shelter roofs, i.e. wind vanes B. Along the Right-of-way 1. Power poles - color, attachments, design 2. Finisheslcoverings for mechanical shedslboxes 3. Signagelmarkers 4. Landscaping 5. Lighting 6. Paving 7. Murals on buildings along the alignment 8. Sound walls 9. Fencing C. Vehicles 1. Exterior & interior design of basic vehicle 2. Specially painted vehicles 3. Art in advertising spaces D. Fare Cards Artwork on fare cards. E. Signage 1. Attachmentlmaker on top of standard poles, i.e. whirligigs 2. Specially designed poles to reflect the historyiculture of the area F. Access Ramps 1. Concrete form work 2. Railings 3. Landscaping 4. Markerslidentifiers 5. Lighting 6. Paving 7. Design of colurnns/attachments to columns G. Temporary Art During Construction 1. Installations 2. Displays 3. Performances 4. Publications

111. INVOLVEMENT OF ARTISTS Sound Transit will involve artists in two ways, through a phased approach: 1. to collaborate with the preliminary and final design teams on the development of the project design and on the integration of art into the system as a whole. 2. to create a discrete artwork for a specific site or for a specific purpose. Artists will be under contract to Sound Transit, which will determine their scopes of work, schedules for involvement and compensation. A. Phase I During conceptual development and schematic design, a team of lead artists will work with system designers to: 1. investigate possible systemwide approaches to and opportunities for art that could be incorporated into prototypical elements; 2. identify the prototypical elements that might be modified to give identity and focus to each station; 3. help communities articulate their aesthetic vision for their transit system and choose which art projects to implement. B. Phase I1 During final design, additional artists will be commissioned to carry out specific art projects approved during Phase I. IV. COMMUNITY INVOLVENIENT A. Advisory Task Force To ensure that the Sound Transit art program truly represents the interests of the region, a Public Art Advisory Task Force will be formed. The task force will consist of representatives from each of the jurisdictions in which Sound Transit facilities will be built. The representatives will be primarily city and county staff responsible for public art programs in their own jurisdictions. The task force will: 1. Serve as liaison between Sound Transit and the local jurisdictions they represent on matters related to public art; 2. Advise Sound Transit staff on the implementation of the art program; 3. Provide advice to the Sound Transit Executive Director on the resolution to any disputes concerning public art. B. Affected Communities Affected communities will be directly involved in deciding where and what type of art is appropriate in their communities, and in selecting artists to execute the artwork. Sound Transit will work with local arts commissions to organize these selection processes.

a V. FUNDING A. Federal Policy FTA policy recommends that funds spent on art for transit projects should be a minimum of onehalf percent of construction costs and a maximum of 5 percent. B. National Examples Around the country there have been various formulas used to establish art budgets for transit projects Dallas Area Rapid Transit set aside 1% of construction costs in the bus system and $50,000 for each light rail station Tri-Met in Portland originally set aside 1% for art but recently raised the level to 1.5% to provide funding for non-station-specific elements of the art program Los Angeles County MTA sets aside.5% of all construction costs.- Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel set aside 1% of the visible and accessible elements of the project (i.e. stations and surface improvements) C. Regional Precedents In the Sound Transit region, the most widely accepted practice is for public agencies to set aside a 1% of construction costs for art. D. Sound Transit Art Budget Establishment of a Sound Transit art program will not result in an addition to the current Sound Transit budget. In keeping with local precedents and FTA guidelines, the Sound Transit budget for art will be calculated as 1% of capital construction costs, excluding the cost of tunneling. The funds generated for art will be pooled within each subarea. Opportunities for integrating art will be evaluated for the system as a whole before determining where art is most appropriate and how much money should be allocated for art at specific locations within each subarea. The 1% for art policy will allow the art program to begin without committing to specific dollar amounts until cost estimates for specific construction projects are more firmly established. Because it is anticipated that much of the art will be completely integrated into construction, determining the specific costs attributable to the art budget may not be possible. Costs will be reasonably assigned based on the best judgment of those collaborating on the Sound Transit art and design tasks.