Recent Results with the UAV-based Array Verification and Calibration System

Similar documents
Il progetto SKA: misure di campo elettromagnetico mediante UAV

SKA aperture array verification system: electromagnetic modeling and beam pattern measurements usingamicrouav

SKA Aperture Array Verification System: Electromagnetic modeling and beam pattern measurements using a micro UAV

Design considerations for a low-frequency Vivaldi array element

Smart Antennas in Radio Astronomy

Multi-Mode Antennas for Hemispherical Field-of-View Coverage

Real World Results from a Signal Measurement Drone

G. Serra.

THE KAROO ARRAY TELESCOPE (KAT) & FPA EFFORT IN SOUTH AFRICA

SKA-low and the Aperture Array Verification System

P. 1 of 18 REPORT 1.1. TV ANTENNA RECONSTITUTION P. 1 of 18. Commercial in Confidence SAMPLE SITE (TV). 3 MARCH 2017.

March Phased Array Technology. Andrew Faulkner

November SKA Low Frequency Aperture Array. Andrew Faulkner

New Trends on Receivers Development" May 30, 2005, Medicina. RECEIVING SYSTEMs for the ANTENNAS OPERATED by the INSTITUTE of RADIOASTRONOMY in ITALY

SKA1 low Baseline Design: Lowest Frequency Aspects & EoR Science

Development of a noval Switched Beam Antenna for Communications

Dense Aperture Array for SKA

LOFAR: Special Issues

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Towards SKA Multi-beam concepts and technology

Beamforming for IPS and Pulsar Observations

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-247 ISSUE 1 CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. WLAN 2X2 MIMO a/b/g/n/ac with BLUETOOTH

Vertical or horizontal antenna for limited space

> StarLab. Multi-purpose Antenna Measurement Multi-protocol Antenna Development Linear Array Antenna Measurement OTA Testing

ANTENNA ELEMENTS INTEGRATED INTO THE PARACHUTES OF PLANETARY ENTRY PROBES

Fourth Year Antenna Lab

BROADBAND GAIN STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS MEASUREMENTS

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S *

THE NASA/JPL AIRBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM. Yunling Lou, Yunjin Kim, and Jakob van Zyl

EMBRACE DS5 presentation

Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering BEE4233 Antenna and Propagation. LAB 1: Introduction to Antenna Measurement

Amplifier Characterization in the millimeter wave range. Tera Hertz : New opportunities for industry 3-5 February 2015

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment: Wilkinson power divider (3-port board with oval-shaped trace on it)

Scalable Front-End Digital Signal Processing for a Phased Array Radar Demonstrator. International Radar Symposium 2012 Warsaw, 24 May 2012

RF Technologies for Space Applications Oscar A. Peverini

Link Budgets International Committee on GNSS Working Group A Torino, Italy 19 October 2010

ECC Recommendation (16)04

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

Rec. ITU-R F RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

Ultrawideband Radiation and Propagation

Compact MIMO Antenna with Cross Polarized Configuration

Network Design Considerations and Deployment Concerns for a Ground Aircraft Communication System

Theoretical Simulations of GNSS Reflections from Bare and Vegetated Soils

Location, Location, Location Antenna Installation

On the Plane Wave Assumption in Indoor Channel Modelling

h max 20 TX Ionosphere d 1649 km Radio and Optical Wave Propagation Prof. L. Luini, July 1 st, 2016 SURNAME AND NAME ID NUMBER SIGNATURE

Over the Air Testing: Important Antenna Parameters, Testing Methodologies and Standards

T- DualScan. StarLab

AN ADAPTIVE MOBILE ANTENNA SYSTEM FOR WIRELESS APPLICATIONS

TEST RESULTS OF A DIGITAL BEAMFORMING GPS RECEIVER FOR MOBILE APPLICATIONS

4.4. Experimental Results and Analysis

Radio Frequency Monitoring for Radio Astronomy

Propagation mechanisms

Rev F. Nov 16, /16/2008 Rev F

4GHz / 6GHz Radiation Measurement System

TEST RESULTS OF A HIGH GAIN ADVANCED GPS RECEIVER

EMC Evaluation at Green Bank: Emissions and Shield Effectiveness

CHAPTER 5 THEORY AND TYPES OF ANTENNAS. 5.1 Introduction

GNSS-R for Ocean and Cryosphere Applications

Experimental Evaluation Scheme of UWB Antenna Performance

A LARGE COMBINATION HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL NEAR FIELD MEASUREMENT FACILITY FOR SATELLITE ANTENNA CHARACTERIZATION

Narda DF Antennas - Datasheet. Datasheet

WIESON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

ARRAY CONFIGURATION AND TOTAL POWER CALIBRATION FOR LEDA

Development of a Wireless Communications Planning Tool for Optimizing Indoor Coverage Areas

Multi Band Passive Forward Scatter Radar

Multi-functional miniaturized slot antenna system for small satellites

Gain And Arbitrary Beamwidth Measurement For Identical Test Antennas

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SELF-COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS

GPS-Aided INS Datasheet Rev. 3.0

Prototype Software-based Receiver for Remote Sensing using Reflected GPS Signals. Dinesh Manandhar The University of Tokyo

Preparing VIRAC radiotelescope RT-32 for VLBI observations

EVLA System Commissioning Results

Antenna and Propagation

REVIEW ON THE ITALIAN RADIO TELESCOPE RECEIVERS RECOMMENDATIONS. P. Bolli (INAF-OAA) (on behalf of the WG)

FCC 47 CFR PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-210 ISSUE 8 BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR. 2.4GHz LE MODULE MODEL NUMBER: RN4020

Accurate Planar Near-Field Results Without Full Anechoic Chamber

Traveling Wave Antennas

ETS Lindgren Anechoic Chamber

Collection of technical reports on the electromagnetic analysis and design of the Northern Cross oriented to the BEST (SKADS) test bed.

J/K). Nikolova

FCC CFR47 PART 15 SUBPART C INDUSTRY CANADA RSS-247 ISSUE 1 BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT FOR

New Concepts of Transmitting Antennas for DMB and DVB-H

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Realizing Efficient Wireless Power Transfer in the Near-Field Region Using Electrically Small Antennas

ANECHOIC CHAMBER EVALUATION

RADIOMETRIC TRACKING. Space Navigation

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

Developing wireless products can have antenna pitfalls if you don t know what to look for. Roger Denker, MegiQ, namens TOP-electronics

Pattern-Reconfigurable Antennas Optimized for Automotive Applications

Politecnico di Torino. Porto Institutional Repository

UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS

DAMs Universal Link Commander

ELEC 425 Interference Control in Electronics Lecture 7(a) Introduction to Antennas: Terminology

EISCAT Scientific Association Technical Specification and Requirements for Antenna Unit V 2.0

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

Emission of mm-wave and THz Scanners

STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF INCIDENT WAVES TO MOBILE ANTENNA IN MICROCELLULAR ENVIRONMENT AT 2.15 GHz

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

System configurations. Main features I SG 64 SOLUTION FOR

Transcription:

Recent Results with the UAV-based Array Verification and Calibration System Giuseppe Virone POLITECNICO DI TORINO DIATI

Framework Research contract between INAF and CNR-IEIIT Title: Power Pattern Measurements on the Modern Low-Frequency Arrays for Radioastronomy (AAVSx, LOFAR, SAD) and Feasibility of Phase Pattern Measurements INAF PI: Jader Monari and Pietro Bolli CNR PI: Giuseppe Virone Partner : Politecnico di Torino- DIATI, Resp. Prof. Andrea M. Lingua Official initial date: September 2015 TECNO INAF 2014 Title: Advanced calibration techniques for next generation low-frequency radio astronomical arrays PI: Pietro Bolli (OAA) co-pi: Giuseppe Pupillo (IRA-MED) and Tonino Pisanu (OAC) Official initial date: April 2015 Research grant (18 months) to Salvo Pluchino (IRA-Noto) External collaborators: Stefan Wijnholds, Andrea Lingua and Giuseppe Virone

Flying Far-field Test Source A micro hexacopter is used as far-field RF source flying over the AUT RF transmitter UAV equipped with a continuous-wave RF transmitter and a dipole antenna The UAV autonomously performs quasi-rectilinear, constant height paths (GPS navigation) e.g. E-plane or H- plane cuts Automatic take-off and landing Differental GNSS system to track the position (accuracy few cm) Dipole antenna On-board IMU to measured attitude (pitch, roll, yaw)

Compass Verification DIATI Two scatterers on the UAV Two total station pointing the UAV (accuracy 1 cm) The other angles could be verified as well mean = - 0,547, std = ±0,867 4

AUT gain (dbi) SKALA 2.0 Pattern from 50 to 650 MHz Courtesy of Spin Flight at 50 MHz 10 E-plane @ 650 MHz 5 SKALA dual logperiodic antenna working from 50 to 650 MHz. Height is about 1.8 m -20 Co-polar meas. -25 Co-polar sim. X-polar meas. X-polar sim. -30-60 -40-20 0 20 40 60 Zenith angle (deg) 0-5 -10-15 E-plane at 650 MHz

LOFAR campaign April 2016 in collaboration with Stefan Wijnholds and Menno Norden Aerial View of a LOFAR station (The Netherlands) UAV to perform an end-toend system verification LBA inner Three Arrays in Three Days with Multi-frequency TX (almost 300 Patterns/Flight) HBA half LBA outer Embedded Element Patterns Array Calibration and Pattern Antenna positions (SW s talk) Courtesy of LBAinner: 48 dual-pol elements (random quasi-dense) 10-80 MHz LBAouter: 48 dual-pol elements (random sparse) 10-80 MHz HBA: 48 tiles having 16 dual-pol bow-ties (dense) 120-240 MHz

Normalized gain (dbi) LOFAR LBA antenna in Turin LOFAR Low-Band Antenna in Turin Courtesy of: LBA simulation by Michel Arts using WIPL-D 5 Normalized pattern @ 60 MHz - E-plane 0-5 -10-15 LBA antenna consists of a pair of crossed inverted-v dipoles operating from 10 to 80 MHz. Antenna height is 1.7 m, width is about 3 m -20-25 -30-35 -40 co-polar meas. co-polar sim. x-polar meas. -45-60 -40-20 0 20 40 60 (deg)

Gain Measurement

Gain Measurement

AUT AUT Pattern Pattern (dbi) (dbi) AUT AUT Pattern Pattern (dbi) (dbi) Embedded Element Pattern LBA inner Extracted AUT pattern @4.450950e+01 MHz, volo2_autocorr_44p5mhz 10 10 5 5 0 0 Extracted AUT pattern @4.450950e+01 MHz, volo2_autocorr_44p5mhz Extracted TW1, x scan, AUT average pattern @4.450950e+01 bearing: 88, RMS MHz, dev. volo2_autocorr_44p5mhz from ideal plane: 0.4 TW1, x CH scan, A: average H-plane bearing: cross-polar; 88, CH RMS B: dev. E-plane from co-polar ideal plane: 0.4 CH A: H-plane cross-polar; CH B: E-plane co-polar Element 0: E-plane 44.5 MHz -5-5 -10-10 Meas. A Sim. Meas. A A -15 Meas. Sim. A B -15 Sim. Meas. B B -20 Extracted AUT pattern @4.450950e+01 MHz, volo2_autocorr_44p5mhz Sim. B -20-60 -50-40 Extracted TW1, -30 x scan, AUT -20pattern average -10 @4.450950e+01 @5.722650e+01 bearing: 88, 0 RMS MHz, 10 dev. volo2_autocorr_44p5mhz volo2_autocorr_57mhz from ideal 20 plane: 300.4 40 50 60-60 -50-40 TW1, -30 x scan, CH -20 A: average H-plane -10 bearing: Zenith cross-polar; Angle 88, 0 CH RMS (Deg) B: dev. 10 E-plane from co-polar ideal 20 plane: 30 0.4 40 50 60 10 CH A: H-plane cross-polar; Zenith Angle CH (Deg) B: E-plane co-polar 10 5 5 0 0-5 -5 57 MHz -10-10 Meas. A Meas. A Sim. Meas. A A -15 Sim. A Meas. Sim. AB -15 Meas. B Sim. Meas. B B -20 Sim. B Sim. B -20-60 -50-40 -30-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60-60 -50-40 -30-20 -10Zenith Angle 0 (Deg) 10 20 30 40 50 60 Zenith Angle (Deg)

AUT gain (dbi) AUT gain (dbi) AAVS0.5 Embedded Element Patterns at 10 5 0-5 50 and 350 MHz -10-15 Phi=0-50 MHz Mullard Radio Astronomy Observatory (UK) Courtesy of -20 pol A meas pol A sim -25 pol B meas pol B sim -30-50 -40-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Zenith Angle (deg) 10 5 0-5 -10-15 Phi=0-350 MHz -20 co-pol meas co-pol sim -25 x-pol meas x-pol sim -30-50 -40-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Zenith Angle (deg)

Phase (deg) Phase of Cross Correlation Coefficient at 44.5 MHz UAV at zenith above central element of the LBA inner Baseline 0-40 (length 13.7 m) 49 48 47 No Average Averaged Measurement -Correction+Avg(UnCorr)+Avg(Correction) K(R 0 -R 40 ) 46 45 44 43 42 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (sec)

Deg -4.3-4.4 Residual Phase Value Baseline 0-40 Averaged Trace (256 Sample) Average +/- estimated std Average +/- measured std Measured RMS -4.5-4.6 RMS estimated from GNSS precision -4.7-4.8-4.9 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (sec) For shorter baselines where the elements see the UAV at the same observation angle, this residual correspond to the calibration coefficient

Second Day: Wind Speed 35 km/h Cause not yet fully understood The day before the wind was even faster. The UAV was not able to follow the preset path but was still able to land automatically The values of attitude angles (pitch about 20 Deg) are less accurate All the attitude traces are more noisy

Ideas for the Upcoming Cambridge pre-aavs1 Campaign Near-field scan and Relative Phase Measurements Phase Reference Correlator Measured Phase φ out = φ array φ ref K(R array -R ref )

Ongoing: Phase-Locked UAV Transmitter RF oscillator locked with the GNSS PPS signal Independent of Reference Antennas Copy of the transmitted signal Correlator Trimble: 10MHz + PPS Valon: 10 MHz ref. + 400 MHz fout 16

Ongoing: UAV-based Sensitivity Measurements by G. Pupillo and S. Pluchino The proposed method allows to measure the Sensitivity (A eff / T sys ) of the system, including all its parts, in the operating environment. UAV The method estimates the Power Flux Density at AUT G Tx θ, φ PFD = P Tx G Tx θ, φ 4πR 2 [Wm 2 ] AUT R P meas PFD is defined as the transmitted UAV energy, impinging upon the AUT per unit area Soil

P meas [W] UAV-based Sensitivity measurements by G. Pupillo and S. Pluchino P high PFD sys = PFD highp low PFD low P high P high P low P low The sensitivity can be estimated by mean of PFD sys as follow: PFD sys O PFD low PFD high Where: P meas = measured received power [W] PFD low, PFD high = Surface Power Density Wm 2 corresponding to two different power level trasmissions by UAV Assumptions: Rx chain linearity Negligible T sys and gain variations PFD [Wm 2 ] A eff T sys = kb m 2 PFD sys K Tasks to be done: Error budget investigation Simulations Test on the field

Conclusion Good results obtained on single element, embedded-element patterns from 50 to 650 MHz UAV flying test source as an end-to-end verification and calibration system Advantages of UAV-based antenna measurements: Measurements in the real installation conditions Beam pattern measurements on arrays and instrument calibration are possible (see G. Pupillo, et al. Medicina Array Demonstrator: calibration and radiation pattern characterization using a UAV-mounted radio-frequency source, Experimental Astronomy, pp. 1-17, Apr. 2015 Low cost, portability, no infrastructures

S21 (deg) S21 (db) Phase measurements - CABLES 35 LMR400 cable 1 Phase-shift variation with respect to meas. 1 at 10:15 AM 0.12 LMR400 cable 1 Attenuation variation with respect to meas. 1 at 10:15 AM 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Meas. 12 at 16:15 Meas. 11 at 15:45 Meas. 10 at 15:15 Meas. 9 at 14:15 Meas. 8 at 13:45 Meas. 7 at 13:15 Meas. 6 at 12:45 Meas. 5 at 12:15 Meas. 4 at 11:45 Meas. 3 at 11:15 Meas. 2 at 10:45 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0-0.02-0.04 Meas. 12 at 16:15 Meas. 11 at 15:45 Meas. 10 at 15:15 Meas. 9 at 14:15 Meas. 8 at 13:45 Meas. 7 at 13:15 Meas. 6 at 12:45 Meas. 5 at 12:15 Meas. 4 at 11:45 Meas. 3 at 11:15 Meas. 2 at 10:45-5 10 2 10 3 Frequency (MHz) -0.06 10 2 10 3 Frequency (MHz) 400 MHz 400 MHz 21

Relative Phase Measurements Reference characterization In a vertical Flight φ array is constant θ 1 max -θ 1 min θ 1 Reference will be characterized in the range from θ 1 min to θ 1 max Correlator φ out = φ array φ ref K(R array -R ref )