Low frequency SAR data-dome collection with the Bright Sapphire II instrument

Similar documents
THE NASA/JPL AIRBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR SYSTEM. Yunling Lou, Yunjin Kim, and Jakob van Zyl

Detection of Multipath Propagation Effects in SAR-Tomography with MIMO Modes

Study of Polarimetric Calibration for Circularly Polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar

GMES Sentinel-1 Transponder Development

Acknowledgment. Process of Atmospheric Radiation. Atmospheric Transmittance. Microwaves used by Radar GMAT Principles of Remote Sensing

Low Frequency 3D Synthetic Aperture Radar for the Remote Intelligence of Building Interiors

SHIP DETECTION AND SEA CLUTTER CHARACTERISATION USING X&L BAND FULL-POLARIMETRIC AIRBORNE SAR DATA

Tracking of Moving Targets with MIMO Radar

Notice of coordination procedure required under spectrum access licences for the 2.6 GHz band

Cell Extender Antenna System Design Guide Lines

Propagation Modelling White Paper

Microwave Remote Sensing (1)

Calibration Concepts of Multi-Channel Spaceborne SAR

System configurations. Main features I SG 64 SOLUTION FOR

Space Frequency Coordination Group

Composite Messenger Antenna Array 8 (CMAA8)

Biomass, a polarimetric interferometric P-band SAR mission

The SARTOM Project; Tomography for enhanced target detection for foliage penetrating airborne SAR (First-Year Results)

UAVSAR in Africa. Quality Assurance and Preliminary Results. Brian Hawkins, UAVSAR Team

Main features. System configurations. I Compact Range SOLUTION FOR

Fundamental Study on NDT of Building Wall Structure by Radar

> StarLab. Multi-purpose Antenna Measurement Multi-protocol Antenna Development Linear Array Antenna Measurement OTA Testing

NEXTMAP. P-Band. Airborne Radar Imaging Technology. Key Benefits & Features INTERMAP.COM. Answers Now

The Basics of Signal Attenuation

Products & Services Brochure Brochure Microwave Antennas, Subsystems and Consultancy

Through-Wall Detection and Imaging of a Vibrating Target Using Synthetic Aperture Radar

The Biomass Mission, status of the satellite system

Datasheet. 5 GHz Carrier Backhaul Radio. Model: AF-5X. Up to 500+ Mbps Real Throughput, Up to 200+ km Range. Full-Band Certification including DFS

Use of ground based radar to monitor the effect of increased axle loading on rail bridges. Evgeny Shilov. IDS GeoRadar

Figure 121: Broadcast FM Stations

KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

ESA Radar Remote Sensing Course ESA Radar Remote Sensing Course Radar, SAR, InSAR; a first introduction

Lateral Position Dependence of MIMO Capacity in a Hallway at 2.4 GHz

CASE STUDY BRIDGE DYNAMIC MONITORING

The BYU microsar System

Multi Band Passive Forward Scatter Radar

Observational Research in Air/Sea Interaction

Final Report. In-car Mobile Signal Attenuation Measurements. Final report 8th November 2017

High Precision Antenna Characterisation for Broadband Synthetic Aperture Radar Processing

A BROADBAND POLARIZATION SELECTABLE FEED FOR COMPACT RANGE APPLICATIONS

T- DualScan. StarLab

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

Active Radio Frequency Sensing for Soil Moisture Retrieval

LINK RESEARCH ANTENNA PRODUCT MANUAL. Antennas for Digital ENG applications

Radar observables: Target range Target angles (azimuth & elevation) Target size (radar cross section) Target speed (Doppler) Target features (imaging)

Interferometric Cartwheel 1

Calibration Concepts for Future Low Frequency SAR Systems. Jens Reimann, Marco Schwerdt, Sravan Kumar Aitha and Manfred Zink

A bluffer s guide to Radar

Chapter 1: Introduction. EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1652 *

PAZ Product Definition

Datasheet. Licensed Backhaul Radio. Model: AF-4X. Up to 687 Mbps Real Throughput, Up to 200+ km Range

Sentinel-1A Radiometric Calibration

Towards a Polarimetric SAR Processor for Airborne Sensor

Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band GHz for intelligent transport systems applications

Ka by C-COM Satellite Systems Inc.

Towards a polarimetric SAR processor for airborne sensor

Tactical COMMS/ESM System for Submarines. A Front-end Perspective

Active and passive radio frequency imaging using a swarm of SUAS

Prototype Software-based Receiver for Remote Sensing using Reflected GPS Signals. Dinesh Manandhar The University of Tokyo

Remote Sensing. Ch. 3 Microwaves (Part 1 of 2)

Real World Results from a Signal Measurement Drone

Air Band Multicoupling Products MHz MHz

EEM.Ant. Antennas and Propagation

Detection of traffic congestion in airborne SAR imagery

Introduction Active microwave Radar

4G Coverage Obligation Notice of Compliance Verification Methodology. Statement

Input Return Loss, db > 26 Narrowband to Narrowband Isolation, db > 30

Mm- Wave Propaga-on: Fundamentals and Models

TEST REPORT. Report No.: HK (R1) Spin Master Toys Far East Ltd. Application For Certification (Original Grant) (FCC ID: PQN44438TX2G4)

For the mechanical system of figure shown above:

CubeSat Communications Review and Concepts. Workshop, July 2, 2009

Notice of aeronautical radar coordination. Coordination procedure for air traffic control radar - notice issued to 3.

Stay informed and entertained in flight. Live satellite television for super-mid and long-haul aircraft in the contiguous United States.

ATS 351 Lecture 9 Radar

Fundamental Concepts of Radar

Research Article Penetration Loss Measurement and Modeling for HAP Mobile Systems in Urban Environment

Sentinel-1A Tile #11 Failure

& REACTIVE RCIED JAMMING

SAOCOM-CS Mission and ESA Airborne Campaign Data

RFeye Arrays. Direction finding and geolocation systems

Polarisation Capabilities and Status of TerraSAR-X

PHALANX INTELEGENT SAFETY SYSTEMS

The DARPA 100Gb/s RF Backbone Program

Ka-Band Systems and Processing Approaches for Simultaneous High-Resolution Wide-Swath SAR Imaging and Ground Moving Target Indication

VenSAR: A MULTI-FUNCTIONAL S-BAND RADAR FOR THE EnVision MISSION TO VENUS

Radar Imaging Wavelengths

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1628

700 MHz MiMO Yagi Antenna

A Stepped Frequency CW SAR for Lightweight UAV Operation

Milton Keynes Amateur Radio Society (MKARS)

EE 529 Remote Sensing Techniques. Introduction

Scalable Ionospheric Analyser SIA 24/6

Further Refining and Validation of RF Absorber Approximation Equations for Anechoic Chamber Predictions

Real-Time Spectrum Monitoring System Provides Superior Detection And Location Of Suspicious RF Traffic

Non Invasive Electromagnetic Quality Control System

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

Phantom Dome - Advanced Drone Detection and jamming system

Characteristics and protection criteria for radars operating in the aeronautical radionavigation service in the frequency band

Network Design Considerations and Deployment Concerns for a Ground Aircraft Communication System

Transcription:

Low frequency SAR data-dome collection with the Bright Sapphire II instrument Specialists meeting on Remote Intelligence of Building Interiors Sam DOODY May 2017

Low Frequency Airborne SAR Justification and potential 2

Airborne SAR Airborne SAR is a useful method to gather ISTAR information. Multiple airborne campaigns have proven the advantages of such systems, which include: Remote stand-off All weather, day-night sensing capability Height information and 3D tomography (with adequate acquisitions) Multi-frequency system Potential for customisation Flexibility on operation X-band fully polarimetric SAR image, Milton Keynes 3

Low Frequency RF The use of low frequency RF for communications applications requiring building penetration is well established, with very common examples such as mobile and Wi-Fi. The attenuation rate of building penetration depends on: Signal frequency Building construction and materials Penetration angle 4 Calculated attenuation rates of building materials. Source: OFCOM report on Building Materials and Propagation

LF SAR Low frequency SAR is a solution to seeing inside buildings and facilities to detect activity or occupancy. An airborne demonstrator campaign has been performed to prove the potential capabilities of LF SAR. The key elements of the demonstration programme is: Development of Bright Sapphire II LF SAR sensor Integration of the sensor onto the trials aircraft Planning and undertaking of trials to acquire data Conversion of raw data to CPHD format to enable exploitation. LFSAR Data Dome 5 LFSAR Data Dome demonstrator key elements

LFSAR Data Dome Trials and instrument overview 6

Trials The trial objective is to collect data in such a way that it can be coherently combined to form a Data-Dome. Data-Dome refers to a collected dataset that covers a hemisphere over the target area defined in k-space. The data-dome collection enables tomographic and volumetric information to be extracted about the building. To achieve the objective, circular acquisitions were used to image over 360 of azimuth (α) and 20-70 range of incidence angles (θ), with a height separation adequate to avoid height ambiguities during tomographic combination. Linear acquisitions were added to the trials to verify instrument performance and to be able to fly closer to the target for enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. 7 Data Dome representation in k-space

Targets Data collected over a range of different target types (tent, wooden shed, plastic Shed, wooden lodge, brick buildings) to explore the capability of penetration of buildings of a range of material and construction types that cannot be penetrated by other sensors (optical, infrared). For each building structure, calibration targets were placed inside and outside the building to assess the potential for building penetration. Ground truth was performed in each target to identify internal features. Some examples of imaged targets: DD6 Brick Building-Sports Facility (left) with internal targets (Right) DD7 Wooden Scandinavian Lodges (left) with internal targets (Right) 8 DD1, DD2 Tent, Wooden Shed, Plastic Shed and calibration targets (internal and external) DD17 Two storey Brick Building-Residential (left) with internal targets (Right)

Sensor The Bright Sapphire II sensor is capable of operating at low frequencies with a large bandwidth (200-1300 MHz), which can offer a slant range resolution of 12cm, uncommon at such low frequencies. The sensor took the key elements of the original Bright Sapphire replacing the Front End Electronics, implementing a more compact antenna and doing the necessary modifications and upgrades to the Back End. The system is capable of also transmitting low-band (UHF, VHF, P, L-band), S-band and X-band simultaneously with additional aircraft installation. Parameter Centre frequency Bandwidth Polarisation HPA peak transmit power Tx Duty Cycle (max) 750MHz 1.1GHz Value Quad polarisation 80W Rx Duty Cycle (max) 20% System Noise Figure System losses Instrument mass CW (10W) 2.6dB 12.1dB 101.5 kg Power consumption (max) 800W 9 Bright Sapphire II instrument top-level architecture Tx Notching ability Yes Bright Sapphire II instrument key parameters

Aircraft integration The sensor is current deployed on a B200 Super King Air (G-IMEA): The sinuous antenna is mounted within the radome. The instrument is installed into a compact E-rack that fits onto seat rails in the cabin. It is the largest pod installed on an aircraft of its category. 10 Trials aircraft showing large underbelly radome Instrument mounted in E-rack in aircraft cabin

NESZ [db] NESZ [db] Predicted performance The main limitations to NESZ performance are: Maximum antenna size that can be fitted in the aircraft, and therefore, limited gain. Need to notch part of the Tx spectrum due to OfCom regulations in the UK. Flight accuracy and weather conditions that will cause variations in the pointing angle and ground speed (circular runs). In circular runs, minimum distance to the target is limited by the aircraft turning rate and angle of bank. Linear acquisitions have been used for some collections to have enhanced NESZ performance (and hence, SNR) Mode 61, Circular Data-Dome Reference mode 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80-5 -10 Mode 70, Liner Data-Dome 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80-5 -10-15 -15-20 -20-25 -25-30 -30-35 Near incidence angle (deg) -35 Near incidence angle (deg) 11 Sinuous NESZ Full Band (no notching) Notched NESZ NESZ with ±7.5 AoB NESZ with ±7.5 AoB at max ground speed Sinuous NESZ Full Band (no notching) Notched NESZ Notched NESZ at max ground speed

Key challenges The key challenges encountered with the development and operation of such a sensor are: Antenna performance and accommodation The sinuous antenna used has a low gain and a very wide beamwidth illuminating reverse ambiguous regions Higher gain antennas, such as the log periodic, could not be accommodated on a small aircraft. Ofcom Licence Required for radio transmission in the UK, requiring notches in the transmit signal. St1 St2 St3 St4 St5 St6 12

Key challenges The key challenges encountered with the development and operation of such a sensor are: Interferers The frequency band of operation contains a lot of strong in-band interferers. A simple method of nulling bins in the data containing interferers has been used for the preliminary results presented. However, due to the number and range of strengths of interferer, a robust method is required. Interferer spectrum Spectrum after simple interferer removal Interferer removal example for stitches 5 (left) and 6 (right) 13

LFSAR Data Dome Results Capability of remote sensing building interiors 14

Preliminary results: Potential for building penetration 1m resolution not finest possible! An initial assessment of the data after the first week on collection DD1/DD2/DD7 shows the potential for building penetration. The corner reflectors inside the tent, wooden shed, plastic shed and wooden lodge are all detected with the instrument. 15 DD1_b quad polar image, showing the building structures inside which each calibration target was placed

Preliminary results: Potential for building penetration 1m resolution not finest possible! An initial assessment of DD6 (brick Mablethorpe Athletics Club), comparing the upper half of the spectrum and the lower half, appears to show the internal trihedral when using the lower frequencies. Stitch 4,5,6 imagery Stitch 1,2,3 imagery Optical image of building Trihedral inside building 16

Conclusions The airborne trials undertaken with the Bright Sapphire II sensor have proven the instrument capability to see through optically opaque objects and detect targets inside buildings of different construction types. Further enhanced processing including a robust method for interferer removal will allow full exploitation of the data: Better resolution: 12-17 cm slant range resolution (after notching). 3D tomographic and volumetric exploitation of the building. To observe weaker objects within buildings then a larger instrument development would be required to improve SNR and reduce the impact of interferers on the data. Data can be made available to those that would like to process and analyse it. 17 Imagery from DD17 processing only stitch 1 VV (200-383 MHz) at 2m resolution.

Thank you Copyright mention