Predicting the performance of cathodic protection systems with large scale interference

Similar documents
PREDICTION OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN FPSO AND SUBSEA CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS

ICCP Retrofit Challenges for an Offshore Jacket Complex

Jim Britton Deepwater Corrosion Services Inc. Houston, TX. UTC 2008 Bergen

Oil&Gas Subsea Production

General Consideration about Current Distribution and Potential Attenuation Based on Storage Tank Bottom Modeling Study

WAY AHEAD IN CORROSION CONTROL

FIELD CASE STUDIES: CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS

WAY AHEAD IN CORROSION CONTROL

Cathodic Protection & Monitoring

Discipline. Technology TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT. Technology WITHIN SBM OFFSHORE

Offshore Development Concepts: Capabilities and Limitations. Kenneth E. (Ken) Arnold Sigma Explorations Holdings LTD April, 2013

Floating Production Installations

Floating Systems. Capability & Experience

OFFSHORE CATHODIC PROTECTION AND INTEGRITY

Dagang Zhang China-America Frontiers of Engineering Symposium San Diego, USA

WAY AHEAD IN CORROSION CONTROL OFFSHORE WIND. stoprust.com

Well Casing Cathodic Protection - Design Issues, Lessons Learned and a Case History

2018 Tulane Engineering Forum

Design check of an S-Lay offshore pipeline launching using numerical methods

Training: Industry Overview

Offshore Wind Risks - Issues and Mitigations

Examples of Design for Cathodic Protection Systems

MOORING SOLUTIONS IN ASIA PACIFIC A SINGLE, LOCAL SOURCE OF MOORING, POSITIONING AND RIG MOVING SERVICES

p. 1 p. 29 p. 39 p. 67 p. 79 p. 87 p. 95

Summary of Changes and Current Document Status

Rapid Deployment System. subsea pipelines

Reading List for the Subsea Engineering Masters Programme

Analyzing Thermal Insulation for Effective Hydrate Prevention in Conceptual Subsea Pipeline Design

Jørn Scharling Holm DONG Energy

UNDERWATER ACFM CRACK MICROGAUGE MODEL U31D PRODUCT INFORMATION

FE014: Cathodic Protection Systems: Design, Fabrication, Installation, Operation & Repair

The use of CFD to assess valve performance and operation in extreme conditions. BVAA Conference Tuesday 12 th May Alex Roff Engineering Director

Offshore Drilling Rigs

Subsea STP Buoy Mooring

VIRTUS CONNECTION SYSTEMS Advanced Diverless Connection Solutions for any Subsea Field Application

TDI White Paper UPS Systems for Non-Environmentally Controlled Environments

Thermodynamic Modelling of Subsea Heat Exchangers

Delivering Subsea Solutions Using a Systems Engineering Approach

ESSENTIAL PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT FOR MANAGING MULTIPLE OIL AND GAS ASSETS

Linear Polarisation Noise for Corrosion Monitoring in Multiple Phase Environments. (Patent Pending)

CFD modeling and optimization of a cooling pond

INVESTIGATION OF SLUG FLOW IN DEEPWATER ARCHITECTURES. Y. OLANIYAN TOTAL S.A. France

Subsea UK Springboard

Technical Seminar for Cathodic Protection to GOGC Design Unit Specialists. Dr. Nick Kioupis, Cathodic & Lightning Protection Section Head, DESFA

Technological and Logistical Challenges during Construction & Installation of Deepwater Mega Subsea Development in West Africa

Using Critical Zone Inspection and Response Monitoring To Prove Riser Condition. M Cerkovnik -2H Offshore

Flow Assurance. Capability & Experience

CALM CALM. Our Activities

Opportunities and Challenges in Deepwater West Africa Projects

Deepwater Mooring Deeper and Leaner

Static Stray DC Current Interference Testing

Offshore Construction Management Services. Capability & Experience

Implementing FPSO Digital Twins in the Field. David Hartell Premier Oil

Implementing a Deepwater- Pipeline-Management System

AC Voltage- Pipeline Safety and Corrosion MEA 2015

DNV GL s 16 th Technology Week

The World Floating Production Report

Evolution of Deepwater Subsea / Offshore Market

Global Energy Group s multi-client contract showcases UK-based engineering talent to achieve first oil for Catcher

Send your directly to

Arctic and Cold Climate. Capability & Experience

PIPELINE CORROSION RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AC VOLTAGES

REMOTE MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Guiding questionnaire for re-sitting examination

MAGNETOMETER-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF STRAY CURRENT DISTRIBUTION ON CATHODICALLY PROTECTED GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE

A Methodology for Efficient Verification of Subsea Multiphase Meters used in Fiscal Allocation

Totally Integrated Power (TIP) for the Oil and Gas Industry

Transitions in Natural Gas Systems, including Transportation

Monitoring DC Decoupling Devices at Isolation Flanges for Compliance and Pipeline Integrity

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM PRODUCTION SYSTEM IN DEEP AND ULTRADEEP WATER DEPTH

Riser & Flowline Intervention Using New Composite Coil Tubing Technology

Apache Subsea Projects NORTH SEA REGION. Richard Stark Paul Williams

Teledyne Marine Oil and Gas.

Introduction to Subsea Production Systems. What is Subsea? 02 What is Subsea? DNV GL DNV GL 2013 August 2015

OFFSHORE SPECIALIST ENGINEERING SERVICES. ZEE Engineering Consultants

Learn more at

SUBSEA 7 AND GRANHERNE ALLIANCE. Engaging Early to Deliver Value

Working in the subsea sector. William Kilpatrick

Introduction to Subsea Production Systems. What is Subsea? 02 What is Subsea? DNV GL DNV GL 2013 September 2014

FPSO Update for NOIA 2012 Fall Meeting

Subsea Tieback Forum

Electrical Safety. Mastertitelformat bearbeiten. The Power in. Mastertextformat bearbeiten. Zweite Ebene. Dritte Ebene.

Identification and Control of Impressed Current Cathodic Protection System

Subsea Engineering Division Presentation at SubseaUK Networking Event Bristol

Local Contribution to the Aasta Hansteen development

Propagation Modelling White Paper

Fast Production Recovery of a Typhoon- Damaged Oil Field in the South China Sea

Learn more at

CANADA S OCEAN SUPERCLUSTER DRAFT NOVEMBER 1

Background Why? What are the business drivers? Subsea, Surface or FLNG? Subsea Dehydration & The SubCool Hybrid Concept

Subsea 7 Norway. Monica Th. Bjørkmann Sales and Marketing Director

Morgan Stanley Houston Energy Summit

NOIA ANNUAL MEETING CONCERNS/INITIATIVES. BSEE Update. Joe Levine BSEE Washington DC April 11, 2014

Inter Array Cable Technology Development. Jeremy Featherstone Product Development Director JDR Cable Systems Ltd

DNB's 9th Annual Oil, Offshore & Shipping Conference Kristian Siem Chairman Subsea 7

Slug Flow Loadings on Offshore Pipelines Integrity

OFFSHORE CLAMP PRODUCT GUIDE INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING

Innovative Subsea Engineering

The Marine Well Containment System. LSU Center for Energy Studies Energy Summit 2010 October 26, 2010

M hamed Ouadah 1, 2, *, Omar Touhami 1,andRachidIbtiouen 1

Transcription:

Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II 123 Predicting the performance of cathodic protection systems with large scale interference R. Adey 1, J. M. W. Baynham 1 & T. Curtin 2 1 C M BEASY Ltd, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, UK 2 Computational Mechanics Inc, Billerica, Ma, USA Abstract Understanding the interactions between cathodic protection systems is becoming more complex particularly in the marine and offshore industry. The search for oil and gas in deeper waters and remote environments has resulted in engineering designs with many components on the sea bed as well as at the sea surface. Traditional design methods are inadequate in these situations as interactions will occur between the Cathodic Protection (CP) systems of the components, and significant currents can develop in the connecting flow lines. In this paper recent developments made in the BEASY Corrosion Modelling software are presented which enable these systems to be simulated. Examples are presented showing how computer modelling can play a major role in predicting the level of interaction and providing the key data for the design of the system and its integrity management. 1 Introduction Boundary Element Methods (BEM) have been used to simulate the behaviour of cathodic protection systems since the late 1970s [1]. As the name implies, the method requires creation of elements, but only on the boundary (i.e. surfaces) of the problem geometry. The BEM is used to mathematically model the potential drop in the electrolyte represented by the Laplace equation. In many applications it is sufficient to couple these equations with the equations representing the electrochemical electrode kinetics on the metallic surfaces to form a system of equations capable of simulating the potential fields and current flowing in the electrolyte. doi:10.2495/ecor070121

124 Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II It was common in the early models to make the assumption that the internal resistance of the structure (through which the current returns) is very small compared with that of the electrolyte and the electrode kinetics. Therefore it was possible to ignore the metal resistance when formulating the equations and hence there was no IR drop in the return path. Pipelines present a typical situation where this assumption is not valid as over a long pipeline there is significant drop in the potential due to the internal resistance of the pipeline metal. In new large scale deep water Oil and Gas developments not only are long pipelines present but there are hundreds of individual flow lines and connections each introducing a new electrical connection path which must be considered. Figure 1: Example of a modern deepwater Oil and Gas development. Standard BEM modelling tools are inadequate in these situations as interactions will occur between the Cathodic Protection (CP) systems, causing significant currents (and therefore voltage drops) to occur in the flow lines connecting the components. In this paper recent developments made in the BEASY Corrosion Modelling software are presented which enable these systems to be modelled. 2 State of the art Numerical methods have been widely used in the corrosion field since the early 1980s when IMI Marstons employed them to help model the performance of the impressed anodes to be used on the Conoco TLP platform for the North sea [2].

Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II 125 They have been successfully compared with physical scale modeling experimental results and data obtained from tests performed on full size ships [3]. DeGiorgi et al. studied a 3D model of a U S Navy CG class ship [4] using boundary elements. The potential profiles for reference cell readings of -0.85 Volts Ag/AgCl showed very good agreement between experimental and computational results. The difference between experimental and computational results was 6% for total current values, 5% for Amps to the propeller and 10% for Amps to the docking blocks. The general conclusions were that, boundary element methods are a viable technique for determining marine corrosion parameters. Studies of interference between CP systems of a ship and nearby dock have been made [5], in which it was assumed the metal current paths had zero resistance. 3 Internal resistances From a mathematical point of view the internal resistances can be viewed as a simple electrical circuit where the metal objects are connected by resistances or devices such as diodes. Figure 2 Figure 2: Example internal resistance circuit. Each of the objects in the circuit represents a metal object being protected by a CP system. The resistances are the resistances of the connecting pipelines or flow lines connecting the different components in the structure. If we consider a simple case of a FPSO connected to a buoy by an offloading line. The FPSO may be protected by an ICCP system and the buoy by a sacrificial anode system. If they are not electrically connected then there is unlikely to be interference as the only electrical return path is though the sea water itself. If they are connected by the offloading lines an electrical circuit is

126 Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II created which allows for example current to flow from the ICCP anodes on the FPSO to the buoy and current to return along the offloading lines. This can be expressed mathematically as: I FlowlineConnectedToBuoy = I BuoyAnodes + I BuoyMetalSurfaces Similarly for the FPSO I = I + I FlowlineConnectedToFPSO FPSOAnodes FPSOMetalSurfaces For equilibrium the current flowing along the Flowline to either the buoy or the FPSO must balance. The currents flowing into or out of the metal surfaces on the buoy and the FPSO can be determined by integrating the normal current density calculated by the boundary elements over the metal surfaces of the structure. Therefore the internal circuit resistance equations and the boundary element equations representing the sea water can be solved together to predict the potentials and currents flowing in the system. 3.1 User interface In a complex situation there may be hundreds of individual circuits and connections to be modelled. Therefore a Graphical User Interface (GUI) has been developed to simplify the task of the user in creating the model and to provide a visual means of auditing the connections. Figure 3: The Circuit editor enables electrical connections to be made between parts of the model and to specify their electrical resistance.

Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II 127 Figure 3 shows a view of the circuit editor. Metal objects can be selected and electrical connections made simply by picking them with the mouse and specifying the type of connection. Structures can also be grouped together if their electrical connections have negligible resistance. Figure 4: Pipelines properties can be viewed and specified by clicking on the object to display the properties window. The internal resistance of pipelines and their connections can be specified in a similar way, as shown in Figure 4 4 Application The technology has been used to simulate performance of a number of Oil & Gas facilities ranging from Jacket type structures with controlled anodes (i.e. diodes) to deepwater applications with subsea facilities and pipelines. In the application presented here the investigation focuses on an offloading buoy and its anchor chains.

128 Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II The anchor chains present an interesting CP problem because there is significant attenuation of the current flowing along the chains due the very high internal resistance caused by the chain link to chain link contact. Therefore near the buoy the chain will receive significant current from the anodes but this will drop off significantly within 25 30m. The model of the buoy and its anchor chains is shown in Figure 6. Figure 5: Typical buoy layout with offloading lines and anchors. Figure 6: Model of the buoy and the anchor chains.

Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II 129 Figure 7: Detailed view of the connections between the buoy and the anchors. Figure 7 shows the buoy and the anchor connections. The model includes a full 3D model of the connectors (Seen as cylinders in the model) including the internal geometry because the anodes not only need to protect the outer metallic surfaces but also the internal structure. The chains have been electrically connected to the buoy and have a high internal electrical resistance. In the model of the complete system the lines connecting to the FPSO would also be included as well as the FPSO and the subsea systems. The predicted protection potentials provided by the CP system is shown in Figure 8. The attenuation of the current on the anchors can be clearly seen in figure 9. 5 Conclusions A method has been demonstrated which allows coupled calculation of the metal voltage drop in pipelines, the potential field in the electrolyte, and the electrode kinetics. Since the metal voltage drops which occur in practise may be 100 mvolts or more, the determination of such coupled solutions with proper account taken of metal resistance is a very important part of CP design.

130 Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II Figure 8: Protection potentials on the buoy and anchors. Variation of current density along chains on legs 7, 8 and 9 Current density (milliamp/m**2) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Legs 7 and 9 Leg 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 Distance from top of chain Figure 9: Attenuation of the current density on the anchor with distance from the buoy. References [1] Brebbia C.A, Boundary Element Method for Engineers, Pentech Press. London, 1978.

Simulation of Electrochemical Processes II 131 [2] Danson, D.J. and Warne, M.A. Current Density/Voltage Calculations Using Boundary Element Techniques, Corrosion/83. 1983. [3] Thomas, E. D., Lucas, K. E., and Parks, A. R., Verification of Physical Scale Modeling with Shipboard Trails, Corrosion 90, Paper 370, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, 1990. [4] V.G. DeGiorgi, A. Kee, E.D. Thomas. Characterization accuracy in modelling of corrosion systems. Boundary Elements XV. Vol. 1: Fluid Flow and Computational Aspect. Editors: C.A. Brebbia, J.J. Rencis. CML Publications, Southampton, 1993. [5] Adey R A, Santana Diaz E. Computer Simulation of the Interference Between a Ship and Docks Cathodic Protection Systems, Electrocor 2005, Cadiz, Spain. May 2005.