Determining the Cause of a High Retry Percentage

Similar documents
Unmatched RF Spectrum Analysis DATA SHEETS. Unpublished

EIE324 Communication & Telecommunication Lab. Date of the experiment Topics: Objectives : Introduction Equipment Operating Frequencies

Chanalyzer 4. Chanalyzer 4 by MetaGeek USER GUIDE page 1

Automatic power/channel management in Wi-Fi networks

AirMagnet Spectrum XT

All Beamforming Solutions Are Not Equal

Datasheet: AirMagnet Spectrum XT

techtip How to Configure Miracast Wireless Display Implementations for Maximum Performance

Steve Leytus. Nuts About Nets Bellevue, WA

Wireless Networked Systems

best practice guide Ruckus SPoT Best Practices SOLUTION OVERVIEW AND BEST PRACTICES FOR DEPLOYMENT

Going Beyond RF Coverage: Designing for Capacity

High Density Experience (HDX) Deployment Guide

AirMagnet Spectrum XT

Chanalyzer by MetaGeek USER GUIDE page 1

Date: 01/01/17 10:26:10AM

Wireless technologies Test systems

802.11n. Suebpong Nitichai

Cisco CleanAir Accessory for Chanalyzer

Chanalyzer by MetaGeek USER GUIDE page 1

Smart Antenna Techniques and Their Application to Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. Plenary Talk at: Jack H. Winters. September 13, 2005

Jeffrey M. Gilbert, Ph.D. Manager of Advanced Technology Atheros Communications

Deployment Examples and Guidelines for GPS Synchronization

Chanalyzer Pro. Chanalyzer Pro by MetaGeek USER GUIDE page 1

UNDERSTANDING AND MITIGATING

Overcoming Interference is Critical to Success in a Wireless IoT World

Technical Bulletin. DIFFERENT OPERATING MODES, SPECTRAL BEHAVIOUR & DATA THROUGHPUT Prepared by: Jack Van der Star, P.Eng.

Cisco Conducting Cisco Unified Wireless Site(R) Survey. Download Full Version :

Building a robust Wi-Fi Network

USB Port Medium Power Wireless Module SV653

Multipath and Diversity

AutoCell The Self-Organizing WLAN

SEN366 (SEN374) (Introduction to) Computer Networks

Mobile Communications

VoWLAN Design Recommendations

Recent Developments in Indoor Radiowave Propagation

IEEE Wireless Access Method and Physical Specification

A Practical Approach to Bitrate Control in Wireless Mesh Networks using Wireless Network Utility Maximization

Increasing Broadcast Reliability for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. Nathan Balon and Jinhua Guo University of Michigan - Dearborn

Understanding and Mitigating the Impact of Interference on Networks. By Gulzar Ahmad Sanjay Bhatt Morteza Kheirkhah Adam Kral Jannik Sundø

Reading and working through Learn Networking Basics before this document will help you with some of the concepts used in wireless networks.

A Location-Aware Routing Metric (ALARM) for Multi-Hop, Multi-Channel Wireless Mesh Networks

Noisy Times in Wireless. Welcome to Our World

Real-World Range Testing By Christopher Hofmeister August, 2011

AN797 WDS USER S GUIDE FOR EZRADIO DEVICES. 1. Introduction. 2. EZRadio Device Applications Radio Configuration Application

Fanny Mlinarsky octoscope, Inc. 20 February 2013

An Opportunistic Frequency Channels Selection Scheme for Interference Minimization

SafeMobile Radio Configuration

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

RADIO FREQUENCIES, WI-FI & JARGON. Chris Dawe & Tom Bridge

Urban WiMAX response to Ofcom s Spectrum Commons Classes for licence exemption consultation

Co-existence. DECT/CAT-iq vs. other wireless technologies from a HW perspective

Channel Deployment Issues for 2.4-GHz WLANs

Introduction to Basic Reflective Multipath In Short-Path Wireless Systems

Wi-Fi. Wireless Fidelity. Spread Spectrum CSMA. Ad-hoc Networks. Engr. Mian Shahzad Iqbal Lecturer Department of Telecommunication Engineering

How to Cover a 40,000 square-foot Warehouse with High-Level Wi-Fi Signals Using Waveguide Technology

Exam 3 is two weeks from today. Today s is the final lecture that will be included on the exam.

Industrial Wireless: Solving Wiring Issues by Unplugging

In this unit we will see how WiFi networks work

By Ryan Winfield Woodings and Mark Gerrior, Cypress Semiconductor

Wireless Intro : Computer Networking. Wireless Challenges. Overview

On the Coexistence of Overlapping BSSs in WLANs

3 USRP2 Hardware Implementation

Solution Paper: Contention Slots in PMP 450

1 Interference Cancellation

Result Report on MDRU Joint Project. March, 2016

Enhancing Bluetooth Location Services with Direction Finding

LeCroy UWBSpekChek WiMedia Compliance Test Suite User Guide. Introduction

RF System Design and Analysis Software Enhances RF Architectural Planning

SV613 USB Interface Wireless Module SV613

THE XIRRUS APPROACH WHY ARE THEY SO DIFFERENT (A BLACK SHEEP)? SEPTEMBER 2014

Full Duplex Radios. Sachin Katti Kumu Networks & Stanford University 4/17/2014 1

Basic Radio Settings on the WAP371

Ilenia Tinnirello. Giuseppe Bianchi, Ilenia Tinnirello

Wireless LAN Applications LAN Extension Cross building interconnection Nomadic access Ad hoc networks Single Cell Wireless LAN

In-device coexistence simulations for smartphones

Embedded Radio Data Transceiver SV611

The Response of Motorola Ltd. to the. Consultation on Spectrum Commons Classes for Licence Exemption

Cricket: Location- Support For Wireless Mobile Networks

Cellular Infrastructure and Standards while deploying an RDA

Location Planning and Verification

Imagine a world where every light could connect you to the Internet. Imagine LiFi.

HiSeasNet 2015 Troubleshooting Session

Predictable Packet Delivery from Wireless Channel Measurements. Daniel Halperin Wenjun Hu, Anmol Sheth, David Wetherall

Performance of the IEEE b WLAN Standards for Fast-Moving Platforms

Planning Your Wireless Transportation Infrastructure. Presented By: Jeremy Hiebert

SpotFi: Decimeter Level Localization using WiFi. Manikanta Kotaru, Kiran Joshi, Dinesh Bharadia, Sachin Katti Stanford University

Politecnico di Milano Advanced Network Technologies Laboratory. Radio Frequency Identification

Co-Existence of UMTS900 and GSM-R Systems

SMART RFID FOR LOCATION TRACKING

Location Services with Riverbed Xirrus APPLICATION NOTE

Cognitive Wireless Network : Computer Networking. Overview. Cognitive Wireless Networks

OFFICE WIRELESS NETWORK PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT BY CHANGING WIRELESS ROUTERS INSTALLMENT PATTERN AND RADIO CHANNEL SETTING

HOW DO MIMO RADIOS WORK? Adaptability of Modern and LTE Technology. By Fanny Mlinarsky 1/12/2014

Understanding Single Radio, Dual Radio and Multi-Radio Wireless Mesh Networks

Doodle Labs Prism-WiFi Transceiver NM-4900 High Performance COFDM/MIMO Broadband Transceiver with minipcie

Cambium PMP 450 Series PMP 430 / PTP 230 Series PMP/PTP 100 Series Release Notes

Boosting Microwave Capacity Using Line-of-Sight MIMO

Using Vision-Based Driver Assistance to Augment Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network Communication

ZigBee Propagation Testing

Transcription:

WHITE PAPER Determining the Cause of a High Retry Percentage Advances in Wi-Fi technology have made Wi-Fi the preferred access method for everything from social media to business-critical applications. This has raised expectations for high performance to new levels, and any negative impact needs to be resolved immediately. Retry rates are the most reliable indicator of performance issues, and quickly diagnosing high retry rates and isolating them to a root cause is an essential activity for maintaining high performance of a Wi-Fi network. TABLE OF CONTENTS» Introduction» Common Causes» Effective Diagnoses 1 of 9

Introduction Wi-Fi has come a long way over the years. From devices to access points (APs) to antennas to management software, there are numerous aspects of the technology that are just plain better than they were before. It is not even a trade-off. We pay less, we get more and it works...usually. The advances in Wi-Fi have led to one unfortunate side effect for network engineers: people expect things to work. No longer is a shaky wireless connection greeted with a shake of the head and an eye roll. Today, a trouble ticket gets sent whence the Wi-Fi came and users wonder how it is that their home Wi-Fi can work better. In some ways, it is the normal maturity of technology. Few people purchase an automobile -- a mature technology, I think we all can agree -- if the car can t be reliably maintained. Fast speeds, heated seats and pinpoint handling don t matter if you can t tell when the oil needs changing. Maintenance is a requirement, not a feature. With so many links in the Wi-Fi chain getting better -- the devices, the APs, etc. -- it has become a situation where the trouble spots have moved to the air. Engineers need to know when that most sensitive part of the network is troubled, and why. The good news is that the most reliable symptom of trouble in the air is known: retry percentages. In Wi-Fi, a retry is a retransmitted frame. ( Frame refers to what is commonly called a packet. In Wi-Fi, the term frame is preferred because packet implies that an IP header is present. Many Wi-Fi frames do not include IP headers.) A retry occurs following a collision. The presence of high percentages of collisions -- identified in Wi-Fi frames as retries is bad news for Wi-Fi performance. A collision means that a Wi-Fi frame was unsuccessful and unsuccessful Wi-Fi frames waste channel time. Collisions also increase the Wi-Fi contention window, which is another waste of channel time. The loss of channel time due to failed frames and larger contention windows means less available channel time for real, useful data. That's bad for Wi-Fi performance. Identifying whether retries are happening is relatively simple, especially when using a tool like NETSCOUT AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO. Whether looking big or small, AirMagnet has a screen for it. Want statistics on a whole group of APs and stations? AirMagnet s Channel screen shows retry counts and percentages for every device that has a Wi-Fi radio, one channel at a time. Want retry statistics targeted for one AP or station? AirMagnet s Infrastructure screen can handle that, with integrated one-click device filters to boot. The problem is that seeing Wi-Fi retries is like seeing leaking fluid coming from a car. You know something's wrong, but you may not know exactly what's wrong. It is in that spirit that this paper goes beyond just getting the raw retry numbers. The goal here is to understand the root causes of high retry percentages, and to understand how AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO can be used to determine which cause (or causes) is the source of Wi-Fi performance issues. 2 of 9

Common Causes First, the causes. There are several common causes of Wi-Fi performance issues, all of which commonly lead to high Retry Percentages. They are: Interference Activity from wireless devices that do not use 802.11/Wi-Fi protocols, such as wireless headsets, automated lighting systems, security cameras and a host of others, can cause Wi-Fi collisions. Hidden Nodes A hidden node is a Wi-Fi AP or station that is unable to hear nearby Wi-Fi traffic, but is capable of interfering with that same Wi-Fi traffic. It sounds like an odd situation because it can t happen in wired networking. If a wired device can reach something, then it can hear it. In wireless networking, the area that a transmitted frame reaches may be very different than the area that a receiving device can hear. See the diagram below: 3 of 9

Stations and APs located in hidden node areas cause collisions, especially when Wi-Fi networks get busy. 4 of 9

Sticky Data Rates The IEEE 802.11 standard may govern the regulations and protocols of Wi-Fi, but many aspects of device behavior are left open to vendor interpretation. One of those aspects is data rate selection. Each Wi-Fi station and AP has the right to choose which data rate is used for each transmitted frame. If radio frequency (RF) channel conditions change due to mobility, congestion or other common enterprise Wi-Fi occurrences, APs and stations must change data rates accordingly or run the risk of transmitted frames not reaching intended receivers, which will result in more retries. Mismatched Transmit Power As with data rate selection, radio transmit power is ungoverned by the IEEE 802.11 standard. Both are left to APs and stations for the same reason because different environments and devices have different Wi-Fi requirements and both can cause the same result: Wi-Fi collisions. Radio transmit power often causes collisions if APs and stations use transmit power levels that differ significantly. When AP transmit power goes too high above or below station transmit power, the lower powered party may mistakenly believe that high data rates are stable, thus causing failed transmissions and, ultimately, retries. Disabling of Low Data Rates Modern Wi-Fi best practices sometimes call for low OFDM data rates, including 6, 12 and 18 Mbps, to be disabled. The goal is to inflate throughput test results, as 802.11 management traffic occupies less Wi-Fi channel time when higher rates are required. Disabling low data rates often has the unintended consequence of popping retry percentages once actual users arrive. Natural changes to the physical environment (doors opening and closing, people moving around, etc.) may compromise the stability of RF links between APs and stations. The IEEE 802.11 standard provides low data rates as a fail-safe for such occasions. If those rates are forbidden, the fail-safe is absent and excessive Retries may be the result. Effective Diagnoses The latter two causes of high retry percentages can be corrected by making simple changes to Wi-Fi infrastructure configurations. Network engineers can enable all OFDM data rates and configure AP transmit power to fall within a range that matches ranges commonly used by modern Wi-Fi stations. An AP transmit power range of 14 to 17 dbm works well with mid-2010 s era smartphones, laptops and tablets. 5 of 9

NETSCOUT AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO allows data rate and transmit power configurations to be viewed for many AP models. Network engineers can simply navigate to the Infrastructure screen of AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO, click the desired AP from a list on the left panel of the screen, then select the AP Details tab from the lower right panel of the screen. Information gathered from AP Beacon frames is displayed in the AP Details panel of AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO s Infrastructure screen. The IEEE 802.11 standard makes a listing of enabled data rates mandatory in Beacon frames, while the inclusion of AP transmit power information is optional. Determining whether one of the former three causes (interference, hidden nodes or sticky data rates) is one of the reasons for high retry percentages is more complicated. It can require knowledge of radio frequency communication and the behavior of modern Wi-Fi stations, along with how to us an enterprise-class Wi-Fi analysis tool, like AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO. The most fundamental radio frequency concept to understand is that Wi-Fi communication is ultimately in the hands of the receiving party. If RF interference or competing Wi-Fi traffic appears on a channel near the receiving AP or station, then a collision (failed frame transmission) is likely. If RF interference or competing Wi-Fi traffic appears on a channel near the transmitting AP or station (or halfway in between), then successful frame transmissions are quite possible. 6 of 9

Wi-Fi is very much a location-specific networking technology. Neighbors and interference and all of the other things that affect Wi-Fi performance really only matter if the problem makes its way to the location of the receiver. Portability is essential when attempting to perform location-specific analysis, and AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO offers just that. WiFi Analyzer PRO can be run on a Windows laptop or NETSCOUT OptiView XG analysis tablet. Either option gives network engineers the ability to rove to areas where users have reported Wi-Fi issues and investigate the cause of high retry percentages from there. At this point we would be remiss if we didn t mention that the AirMagnet product line also includes NETSCOUT S best-in-class Wi-Fi spectrum analyzer, AirMagnet Spectrum XT. Spectrum XT with WiFi Analyzer PRO, whether running on a laptop or integrated in the handy tablet form factor of the Optiview XG, makes for a killer combo. The combination of AirMagnet Spectrum XT with WiFi Analyzer PRO makes an especially effective solution for identifying whether Interference is causing wireless retries. Spectrum XT is a spectrum analyzer, and spectrum analyzers show RF activity from all sources, whether the source is Wi-Fi or interference. Spectrum XT also displays the received signal strength of interference sources, often making tracking a simple task. Interference can still be identified using AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO, but it may take some work. The primary Wi-Fi indicator of interference is excessive retries, but interference-based retries will occur mostly in the area surrounding the interference source. Therefore, a Wi-Fi device must be moved to locations suspected of having interference issues, all while keeping an eye on the retry percentages of Wi-Fi traffic that is received by the device. Received retry percentages for Wi-Fi devices can be viewed in the WiFi Analyzer PRO by navigating to the Infrastructure screen, changing the stats pane (lower right corner) to display Rx Total/% Total and then clicking on the device in the left side pane. Identifying another one of the common causes of high retry percentages hidden nodes is done almost in the opposite way to identifying performance. Hidden node problems can be diagnosed in AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO by viewing retry percentages for transmitted data, not received. If a device or AP has a hidden node problem, some of its transmitted data will fail (thus causing retries) if a hidden node becomes active. 7 of 9

A tell-tale sign of a hidden node is when received retry percentages are significantly lower than transmitted retry percentages, but that alone doesn t prove the presence of a hidden node. Transmitted retry percentages can exceed received retry percentages for a number of reasons, most commonly mismatched transmit power. However, if the AP transmit power is configured to match Wi-Fi device transmit power, then an asymmetrically high transmitted retry percentage might be indicative of a hidden node problem. If a hidden node problem is suspected, at that point it is recommended to consult a floorplan of the facility. Hidden nodes exist because some AP or Wi-Fi device is on the same channel, close enough to cause collisions at the location of the receiver and is out of range from the transmitter. It is actually another case where the AirMagnet product suite, including that integrated with the OptiView XG, can help, because this suite includes AirMagnet Survey PRO, which allows for floorplans and channel patterns to be viewed. The final common cause of high retry percentages, sticky data rates, may be the most simple to diagnose using AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO. One must simply look at which data rates are being transmitted by an AP or Wi-Fi device, then check to see if too many high rate frames are being used. APs and Wi-Fi devices are supposed to use lower data rates when transmitting if retries are occurring. Some APs and Wi-Fi devices don t, and the result is lots of high rate traffic that isn t received, has to be re-sent and ends up just wasting every other AP and Wi-Fi device s channel time in the process. AP and Wi-Fi device data rates can be viewed in the Infrastructure screen of AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO. Data rates are tallied in the same place where retry percentages are shown, which is the stats pane. First, an AP or Wi-Fi device must be selected in the left pane of the Infrastructure screen. Then the rates area, followed by the bytes area, must be expanded in the stats pane. Once the stats pane has been set to display Tx Total/% Total, the work can begin. The percentage of traffic transmitted at each rate can be seen and crossreferenced to the retry percentage of the AP s or Wi-Fi device s transmitted data. High retry percentages coupled with high data rates likely means that the selected AP or Wi-Fi device is sticky with its data rates. 8 of 9

Sticky data rates is the one cause of high retry percentages that can t be solved. You can configure APs to use similar power as stations. You can configure APs so that all OFDM rates are enabled. If an interference source is identified, you can remove the interferer or change the channel of the Wi-Fi network. And if a hidden node problem is happening, there are a number of potential solutions: moving APs, changing AP channels, disabling AP radios, adding APs and lowering the RTS threshold on APs or Wi-Fi devices (if the RTS Threshold setting is configurable) are all potential solutions. APs and Wi-Fi devices that are sticky with data rates are configured that way by their manufacturer. As network engineers, we are not AP and Wi-Fi device manufacturers, so we just don t have that level of control. The good news is that Wi-Fi markets are as competitive as ever. If an AP, smartphone, laptop or any other Wi-Fi device has problems with sticky data rates, tell the manufacturer. No company wants to make a low performing Wi-Fi device. The topic of Wi-Fi retry percentages introduces a lot of variables, and that can be frustrating when trying to troubleshoot problems or just perform general analyses on Wi-Fi deployments. Knowing the common causes of high retry percentages can be helpful. Using NETSCOUT AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer PRO to identify the cause of chronic high retry percentages can also be helpful, and when that problem is eliminated, the feeling can be downright joyful. 2018 NETSCOUT. Rev: 03/16/2018 2:04 pm 9 of 9