United States Air Force Europe Bird Strike Hazard Reduction

Similar documents
BASH TEAM NEW DEVELOPMENTS

AOP 19 Wildlife Management (Aerodrome Operating Procedure)

Tools for Birds Ecological Carrying Capacity Management at Airports

INTERNATIONAL BIRD STRIKE COMMITTEE Amsterdam, April 2000 BIRD AVOIDANCE MODEL (BAM) EUROPE

Using Nighttime Falconry for Roosting Blackbird Abatement at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport

Birdstrike Prevention

First page. - Helping Seabirds Thrive -

Bird Hazards. New Zealand Bird Incidents

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

What is Migration? CMS COP12 Regional Preparatory Workshop for Asia. [Tim Dodman] [What is migration?] August 2017 Bonn, Germany

WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PERTH AIRPORT AAWHG HAZARD GROUP FORUM 2015

Avinor Activities since last meeting, results from Risk analysis bird and wildlife control

Assessing BASH Risk Potential of Migrating and Breeding Osprey in the Mid-Atlantic Chesapeake Bay Region

Wildlife Hazard Management in Myanmar 1

SAFEGUARDING OF AERODROMES

EEB 4260 Ornithology. Lecture Notes: Migration

Migration- A migration is a long distance movement of animals, especially seasonal movement between wintering and breeding grounds.

Activity 3.6: Ecological Mismatches

The Bird Strike Risk Reduction Advisory Board: Dominique Schilderman Dutch Airline Pilot Association Pilots Joep Kievits KLM / Air France Airlines

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12

What is a Bird of Prey?

INTERNATIONAL BIRD STRIKE COMMITTEE Amsterdam, April 2000 BIRD STRIKES IN GREECE CIVIL AVIATION

Port of Portland. ICAO/ACI Wildlife Strike Hazard Reduction Symposium May 17 th, 2017 Montréal, Canada

Lesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer By Kachemak Crane Watch

Birdify Your Yard: Habitat Landscaping for Birds. Melissa Pitkin Klamath Bird Observatory

Project Summary. Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska

Introduction. Previous and Ongoing Studies on This Issue

PDX Wildlife Program. January 15 th, Nick Atwell Aviation Wildlife Manager

BIRD STRIKES VERSUS BIRD COUNTS ON AIRPORTS - IS THERE ANY CORRELATION?

Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Management Indicator Species Assessment Ochoco National Forest

Lesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer By Kachemak Crane Watch A Project of the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies

Interspecific variation in wildlife hazards to aircraft: Implications for airport wildlife management

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose

Safeguarding of Aerodromes Advice Note 3 Wildlife Hazards around Aerodromes

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

Report on the Black Headed Gull Ringing Project

Habitat Use by Wildlife in Agricultural and Ranching Areas in the Pantanal and Everglades. Dr. Júlio Cesar de Souza and Dr. Elise V.

Snail Kite capture locations for satellite tracking Doppler GPS. Doppler data: 10 kites 12,106 locations 32 months

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Second Term Extra Credit: Bald Eagle Field Study America s most prestigious bird of prey

Migration of Birds MARC

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2012

Study Surveys of Eagles and Other Raptors

Environmental Issues and Wind Energy Development in Egypt

Migration Board Game Pack. KS2 and KS3

Barn Owl and Screech Owl Research and Management

Wind farms and birds - the SSS Specificity

Anthony Gonzon DE Division of Fish & Wildlife DNREC

Belize: In a Lagoon. by Gregory and Jacalyn Willis Copyright 2012

Step-by-Step Instructions for Documenting Compliance on the Bald Eagle Form For WSDOT s On-Call Consultants

GENERAL PROTOCOL CONTENTS

~Our First Newsletter~

No, the action area is located partially or wholly inside the white-nose syndrome zone. Continue to #2

American White Pelican Minnesota Conservation Summary

Current stage of bird radar systems Felix Liechti, Swiss Ornithological Institute Hans van Gasteren, Royal Airforce of The Netherlands

GOOSEAGEDDON Wildlife Hazard Management

Field Trip to PATUXENT

Activity #15: The Tale of Chipilo Indoor Team Bird Watching

HEADQUARTERS 45TH SPACE WING PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

Machine Learning for Computational Sustainability

Chimney Swifts. Sandy Schwab Chair, Wisconsin Chimney Swift Working Group

Bird Hazard Management Plan. Patrick Port Botany Terminal

ACC GEOBASE BENEFITS AIR FORCE PILOTS AND PROTECTS WILDLIFE

The Starling in a changing farmland

APPENDIX G. MCO East Airfield - Wildlife Data Review (Jan 9, 2015)

Lecture 14 - Conservation of birds

Building A Wood Duck Nest Box

B IRD A NIMAL S TRIKE H AZARD

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Bald Eagle Recovery Questions and Answers

3-D Radar Sampling Methods for Ornithology and Wildlife Management

The Soaring Bird Sensitivity Mapping Tool

Discussion of California Condors and Habitat Conservation Planning in the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area. Friday - April 7, 2017 Mojave, CA

BIRD READING ASSIGNMENT

The Bald Eagle Restored

large group of moving shorebirds (or other organism).

3 rd Generation Thunderstorm Map. Predicted Duck Pair Accessibility to Upland Nesting Habitat in the Prairie Pothole Region of Minnesota and Iowa

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2011

Study Questions. to Splendid Fliers. naturalists. Young

Twilight ascents of Common Swifts: a comparative analysis

PSE Avian Protection Program -Hydro -Wind -Distribution/Transmission -Substations. Mel Walters, Program Manager Consulting Natural Resource Scientist

Northampton Washlands: Frequently Asked Questions

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos)

A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T.

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014

The California Condor is North America s Largest Land bird. 10 feet. Condors can fly 150 miles in a single day

CDOW Recommended Stipulations for Oil and Gas Within the State of Colorado

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SEA DUCKS AND DIVING DUCKS ON LAKE ST. CLAIR AND W. LAKE ERIE

SakerGAP Questionnaire: To be compiled and submitted by National Information Coordinators from each Range State of the species.

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO REDUCE BIRD STRIKES AT JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,

DELAWARE AIR NATIONAL GUARD NEW CASTLE AIRPORT NEW CASTLE, DELAWARE

SakerGAP Questionnaire: To be compiled and submitted by National Information Coordinators from each Range State of the species.

Course 1- Salt Marsh Exploration

International AEWA Single Species Action Planning Workshop for the management of. age e conservation status and possible actions in Germany

Atlantic. O n t h e. One of the best parts of fall is hearing the cacophony of honking,

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Executive Summary for the American Oystercatcher Business Plan

Shorebirds and the East Asian Australasian Flyway

Marine Corps Support Facility-Blount Island: Integrated Natural Resources Program Successes. E2S2 Conference May 12, 2011

Transcription:

203 United States Air Force Europe Bird Strike Hazard Reduction Maj. Gerald Harris United States Air Force Europe Introduction The United States Air Force Europe (USAFE) has a variety of bases, which extend throughout Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. With flight operations spanning such a variety of environments and climates, birdstrike reduction efforts are quite a challenge. The Air Force publishes general guidelines, which describe how to set up a basic Bird Air- Strike Hazard (BASH) program. These guidelines are not all-inclusive but provide a foundation on which to build an effective program. Each base then builds upon this basic document to develop an effective bird strike reduction program based upon each bases particular bird problems. Birds aren t the only problem, there are other animals that can be hazardous to aircraft, including deer, foxes, dogs, pigs, etc. Instead of a birdstrike reduction program, a more appropriate name might be wildlife management program. One of the key factors in determining how to conduct an effective program is environmental control. Determine what makes the airfield environment attractive to birds, and other animals, and reduce the attractiveness as much as possible. Bird Strike Statistics Why is the Air Force so interested in having a BASH program? We have lost 33 aircrew and 14 aircraft in the past 12 years due to birdstrikes. The average cost to the Air Force is 36 million dollars per year. And it s not only fighters which have had fatalities due to birdstrikes. The accident that really caught our attention was the E-3 AWAC s crash on takeoff in Elmindorf Alaska. It showed that not only small fighter aircraft were vulnerable to birdstrikes, but also large multiengine aircraft were susceptible catastrophic birdstrikes. What can we do to help reduce these numbers? If you look at the statistics, the Air Force has recorded over 33,000 bird strikes since 1985. That averages out to approximately 2600 bird strikes a year. Twenty-nine percent of all birdstrikes are unknown to the crew and are not discovered until after flight. If you take out the unknown bird strikes it turns out that 65% of all birdstrike occur in the air field environment (Figures 1 & 2). The second largest phase of military flight involving bird strikes is low-level with 23% of the known strikes. These are military aircraft flight statistics which include low-level training at the altitudes most bird strikes occur. Commercial aircraft typically do not fly low level, below 1000 ft AGL, which means that an even higher percentage of their bird strikes occur around the airfield. The good news is that this is the environment that we have the most control over. We can manipulate the airfield environment to make it less attractive in order to reduce bird populations in these areas.

204 It is important to know that bird strikes occur at different rates depending on the time of year. The majority of bird strikes occur during the two primary migration periods: during the fall migration, (September and October), when birds fly north to south, and during the spring migration when migrating birds return north during the months of April and May. It is also important to realize that the least number of birdstrikes occur during the winter months of December, January and February. Knowing the migration seasons and tracking the migration routes can allow flight crews to flight plan around known migratory routes and reduce their risk of birdstrikes. The migration routes are particularly important to know because the majority of migratory birds are the larger bird species which if hit can cause significant damage to aircraft. These include geese, ducks and storks. Another interesting statistic concerns the altitudes at which bird strikes occur. Figure 3 shows that the vast majority of bird strikes, 66%, occurred below 500 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) and 80% of all bird strikes occur below 1000 feet AGL. The less time spent below 1000 ft the less your chances are of having a birdstrike. BASH Programs In order to make the environment less attractive to birds and other animals you need to ask, what are birds looking for? A good analogy is the following: Birds are like teenagers - they are looking for three things. A place to eat, a place to sleep, and a place to breed. Understanding what is considered attractive or unattractive to birds will help you make environmental decisions to reduce their attractiveness of airfields to birds. What can be done? Maintain grass height at 20 to 40 centimeters. Birds like to have a clear view around them so they can see predators approaching. If the grass height is kept high they will not land. Bare areas allow birds to clearly see predators, therefore they will land in these areas. Plant grass in these areas to reduce the bare spots. Trees attract birds for resting and nesting. Keep the airfield area clear of trees to reduce the areas for birds to nest and roost. Open landfills and garbage dumps attract birds. Do not place a landfill near an airfield or move landfills currently located near airfields. Standing water attracts birds. Eliminate standing water in the airfield environment if possible. Insure that drainage ditches do not hold standing water. Work with your environmental control folks to reduce food sources for birds around the airfield. This can include the use of insecticides and landscaping of the areas around the airfield. Educating flyers on local bird populations, migration routes and current high-density bird locations adds additional information. Aircrews can then use risk management to determine when and where to fly. BIRDTAMs are notices to airmen informing them of known concentrations of birds during different times of the year. During the migratory seasons low-level routes should be varied to avoid known bird concentrations. Flight along rivers and waterways are reduced. Flight routes can be planned to cross perpendicular to peaks and ridgelines minimizing the hazard of hitting soaring raptors, which use the thermals over the peaks. Low level routes and altitudes are planned to avoid seasonal

205 Pattern Landing Missed Final/ Approach Descent Cruise Range Unknown Low-Level Figure 1: Bird strikes by phase of flight Climb Take-Off Figure 2: Bird strikes by phase of flight, without unknown category Low-Level 23% Climb 4% Airfield Environment 66% Descent 1% Cruise 1% Range

206 501 to 1000 15% 1501 to 2000 6% 1001 to 1500 7% 2001 to2500 2501 to 3000 Above 3000 Below 500 66% Figure 3: Bird strikes by altitude Figure 4: Crane Migration over Northern Germany 18.11.98, German Military Geophysical Office - Biology Section

207 migration routes. Other options include setting minimum flight altitudes for specific legs of low-level routes and known roosting areas. When low-level routes become more hazardous due to bird migration, consider closing low-level routes on days that aircrews have reported high bird activity. Real-time warnings can come from a variety of sources but often come from aircrew that encounter large concentrations of birds in flight and report them back to their home station. Information is passed on to other aircraft in that area and in some cases lowlevel routes are closed based on bird sightings from aircrew. The German Air Force uses an enhanced air defense radar system in conjunction with the German Military Geophysical Office to produce NOTOM s based on real time bird radar returns (Figure 4). The locations of birds are passed on to aircrews using a grid map system. Once high concentrations of birds are located, the aircrews are notified of the map grid section which is effected and flight through those areas is prohibited. USAF uses local bird watch conditions to alert aircrew to bird activity around the airfield and restrict their flying during times of high bird activity. Bird Watch Condition codes are used to rapidly communicate changes in bird activity around the airfield. Bird Watch Condition SEVERE: High bird population on, or immediately above, the active runway or other specific locations that represents a high potential for strike. Supervisors and aircrews must thoroughly evaluate mission needs before conducting operations in areas under Condition SEVERE. Immediate action is required to lower the threat. Bird Watch Condition MODERATE: Increased bird population in locations which represent an increased potential for strikes. This condition requires increased vigilance by all agencies and supervisors and caution by aircrews. Bird Watch Condition LOW: Normal bird activity on and above the airfield with a low probability of hazard. This condition will be in effect for the remainder of the flying day, whenever a severe or moderate condition has been declared and subsequently downgraded. Upon extended normal bird activity, no bird watch condition need be declared. Bird forecasts predict where migratory routes are and when birds will be using them. Once birds have been sited around the airfield frightening techniques need to be employed to remove them from the airfield. Some types of frightening techniques include playing distress calls over a loud speaker system to scare birds from the airfield. Distress tapes are available for a variety of bird species. Other techniques include bird-scatter guns, which fire a charge into the air. The round then explodes making a big bang, which startles the birds and causes them to move. The charge is fired so that it will explode over the top of the birds driving them away from the runway. Gas cannons are another dispersal method used that produces a loud noise and can be programmed to fire at specific times. To use gas cannons properly they need to be moved to different locations so the birds don t get acclimated to same sounds coming from the same area. In some cases lethal methods may be required to reduce local bird populations. We employ gun clubs to come out to the airfield on prearranged airfield hunts. The hunters kill

208 the birds that could not be dispersed by other means. This is also effective for controlling other wildlife that is a hazard on the airfield, deer and rabbits for example. Before hunts can begin, we make sure we get the proper permits and that all hunters have been properly trained. Falconry programs have been introduced at many bases in Europe and are very successful, when used in conjunction with other methods, at keeping birds away from the airfield. Conclusions Why have BASH programs? Because birdstrikes kill people and damage aircraft, which effects your ability to maintain our forces. We know that birds want a place to eat, sleep, and breed, so we can deny them that by changing the airfield environment to make it as unattractive as possible. If we combine active controls like falconry, bird scatter cartridges and gas cannons we can further reduce the number of birds near the airfield. By letting our aircrew know when birds are in the area, and by planning flights to limit exposure we can further reduce the risk of birdstrikes. Advances in radar systems are allowing us to see real-time bird movement and forward warnings to our aircrews. Birdstrikes are a hazard that will always be there. We will never eliminate them entirely, but we can substantially reduce the risk of having a birdstrike by controlling the airfield environment, educating our aircrew, and continuing to develop technology that gives us real time bird location data.