Here the goal is to find the location of the ore body, and then evaluate its size and depth.

Similar documents
Sferic signals for lightning sourced electromagnetic surveys

Geology 228/378 Environmental Geophysics Lecture 10. Electromagnetic Methods (EM) I And frequency EM (FEM)

Electromagnetic Induction

HELICOPTER-BORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY SYSTEMS

Old & New? INTRODUCTION. The Best Proximal Geophysical Detector Ever!

TECHNICAL NOTE EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY (ELF) EM SYSTEM

WHAT ARE WE MEASURING?

Technical Note TN-30 WHY DOESN'T GEONICS LIMITED BUILD A MULTI-FREQUENCY EM31 OR EM38? J.D. McNeill

A COMPARISON OF ELECTRODE ARRAYS IN IP SURVEYING

Detection of Pipelines using Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM)

Technical Note TN-31 APPLICATION OF DIPOLE-DIPOLE ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS FOR GEOLOGICAL DEPTH SOUNDING. Introduction

TABLETOP MODELS FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC GEOPHYSICS

Locating good conductors by using the B-field integrated from partial db/dt waveforms of timedomain

7. Consider the following common offset gather collected with GPR.

Stratagem EH4 Geometrics, Inc.

TULLY TOWNSHIP PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

Joint MT/CSEM Anisotropic Inversion Olympic Dam

3. Electromagnetic methods 3.1 Introduction

Statement of Qualifications

On measuring electromagnetic surface impedance - Discussions with Professor James R. Wait

Geology 228 Applied Geophysics Lecture 10. Electromagnetic Methods (EM) (Reynolds, Ch. 10, 11)

BUREAU OF MINERAL RESOURCES, GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS

GCM mapping Vildbjerg - HydroGeophysics Group - Aarhus University

Lect2: EM Radio Waves and Antenna Operation

INVERSION OF EM DATA TO RECOVER 1-D CONDUCTIVITY AND A GEOMETRIC SURVEY PARAMETER. Sean Eugene Walker

Automated anomaly picking from broadband electromagnetic data in an unexploded ordnance (UXO) survey

THE FEASIBILITY OF THE AIRBORNE FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER AS AN EXPLORATION TOOL RESULTS FROM THREE DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELLING

Post processing of Airborne data using the Broadband Frequency Receiver instrument ADU07

Main Menu. Summary: Introduction:

GEOMETRICS technical report

Characterizing Subsurface Structures using Very Low Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation - a Modeling Approach

4.4 The transient electromagnetic method (TEM)

THE SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM

Presented by: Mike Catalano GEONICS LIMITED

REPORTONTHE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY LV- PYCU- DEER LAKE AREA, LITTLE FORT, FOR BARRIER REEF RESOURCES LTD. (N. P. L. ) AND. MARION A. GOUDIE, B.Sc.

Report. Mearns Consulting LLC. Former Gas Station 237 E. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, California Project # E

A case study of the application of spectral analysis of very low frequency (VLF) dip angle measurements in Arigidi, Akoko area, southwestern Nigeria

AC Measurement of Magnetic Susceptibility

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT on the ZIP 1 MINERAL CLAIM ATLIN M.D.

GEOPHYSICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT on the SKIDOO PROPERTY, NATION RIVER PROJECT CCOMBINED HELICOPTER-BORNE MAGNETIC AND VLF SURVEY) FORT FRASER.

Small, Low Power, High Performance Magnetometers

GEONICS LIMITED LEADERS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS GEOPHYSICAL INSTRUMENTATION FOR EXPLORATION & THE ENVIRONMENT

ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY HANDBOOK 1. Chapter 8: Cable Modeling

Wireless Power Transfer. CST COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY

We 21P1 10 Spectral Time Domain IP - Factors Affecting Data Information Content and Applicability to Geological Characterization

I J E E Volume 5 Number 1 January-June 2013 pp

Geophysical Survey Rock Hill Bleachery TBA Site Rock Hill, South Carolina EP-W EPA, START 3, Region 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Signature

Abstract. Introduction

Important Questions. Surveying Unit-II. Surveying & Leveling. Syllabus

Applied Geophysics Nov 2 and 4

EC ANTENNA AND WAVE PROPAGATION

P Forsmark site investigation. RAMAC and BIPS logging in borehole HFM11 and HFM12

LOGISTICS REPORT ON COMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE MAGNETIC, AND VLF-EM SURVEY HEIDI AND TEA AREAS BRITISH COLUMBIA FOR BP RESOURCES CANADA LIMITED RV

ELEC 425 Interference Control in Electronics Lecture 7(a) Introduction to Antennas: Terminology

Subsurface Resistivity Measurements Using Square Waveforms

REPORT ON THE KLECZR~NETIC AND INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEYS ON THE BISSON LAKE PROPERTY OF VERNON MIMW DIVISION, BBITISH COLUMBIA

GEONICS LIMITED LEADERS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS GEOPHYSICAL INSTRUMENTATION FOR EXPLORATION & THE ENVIRONMENT

GCM mapping Gedved - HydroGeophysics Group - Aarhus University

Quantitative VLF data interpretation

Chapter 1: Telecommunication Fundamentals

G003 Data Preprocessing and Starting Model Preparation for 3D Inversion of Marine CSEM Surveys

Magnetic Field of the Earth

LOGISTICS AND PROCESSING REPORT GEOTEM Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey RENABIE WAWA, ONTARIO. Project No

Radiation characteristics of a dipole antenna in free space

You will need the following pieces of equipment to complete this experiment: Wilkinson power divider (3-port board with oval-shaped trace on it)

Advanced Utility Locating Technologies (R01B)

Getting Started with Induced Polarization

I p = V s = N s I s V p N p

Microwave Remote Sensing (1)

ESO 210 Introduction to Electrical Engineering

A p l i s / S e d n a H e l i c o p t e r E M D a t a A q u i s i t i o n R e p o r t

Survey results obtained in a complex geological environment with Midwater Stationary Cable Luc Haumonté*, Kietta; Weizhong Wang, Geotomo

Microseismic & Electromagnetic

CHAPTER 5 Test B Lsn 5-6 to 5-8 TEST REVIEW

Welcome to AntennaSelect Volume 1 August 2013

CSAMT Geophysical Survey K2 Groundwater Project

GOLD DIAMET RESOURCES LTD.

Preseismic TEC changes for Tohoku Oki earthquake

Archaeo-Geophysical Associates, LLC

Characterization of UXO-Like Targets Using Broadband Electromagnetic Induction Sensors

Microwave Optics. Department of Physics & Astronomy Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX. January 16, 2014

GPR Part II: Effects of conductivity. Surveying geometries. Noise in GPR data. Summary notes with essential equations. Some Case histories

Development of a TDEM Data Acquisition System Based on a SQUID Magnetometer for Mineral Exploration

In an unmagnetized piece of iron, the atoms are arranged in domains. In each domain the atoms are aligned, but the domains themselves are random.

SPH3U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS

Electromagnetic investigations by the VLF method of the ore bearing veins in the Hornsund Fiord area

CHAPTER 13 REVIEW. Knowledge. Understanding

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP:: 2057 PAGE: 1 of 6 REV: 0.0 DATE: 07/11/03

Microtremor Array Measurements and Three-component Microtremor Measurements in San Francisco Bay Area

# -antenna (hash) 4 direction switchable array

/ OWNER(S) (' '<+j. me.claim. ...I 158.9swe11.Str.e.e.t...Vancouuez:.B..C... 1'6rS..K ; Powell Street

E) all of the above E) 1.9 T

Identification of UXO by regularized inversion for Surface Magnetic Charges Nicolas Lhomme, Leonard Pasion and Doug W. Oldenburg

Results of GPR survey of AGH University of Science and Technology test site (Cracow neighborhood).

Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: Principles and applications

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Outline

South Africa CO2 Seismic Program

Investigating multi-polarization GPR wave transmission through thin layers: Implications for vertical fracture characterization

Ground Penetrating Radar (day 1) EOSC Slide 1

Magnetic induction with Cobra3

Transcription:

Geophysics 223 March 2009 D3 : Ground EM surveys over 2-D resistivity models D3.1 Tilt angle measurements In D2 we discussed approaches for mapping terrain conductivity. This is appropriate for many hydrogeology applications where subsurface structure changes slowly with horizontal distance. An alternative type of survey was developed for mineral exploration in the early 20 th century. A typical Earth model for this type of survey is a very conductive massive sulphide ore body in very resistive bedrock. Here the goal is to find the location of the ore body, and then evaluate its size and depth. D3.1.1 : Measuring the tilt angle In this type of survey, the direction of the total magnetic field (H T ) is measured. The receiver coil is rotated until the signal received has the minimum amplitude. In this geometry, H T will be parallel to the plane of the search coil. 1

Geophysics 223 March 2009 D3.1.2 Example with fixed transmitter and moving receiver The transmitter generates an oscillating primary magnetic field with a dipole pattern. Consider an instant in time when the primary magnetic field is oriented from left to right and is increasing with time. Time variation in primary magnetic field induces secondary electric currents in the conductor (shown a shaded vertical box) Assume that no secondary electric current is induced in the host rock. Secondary current flows in loops within the conductor and generate a dipolar secondary magnetic field. The secondary magnetic field is equivalent to a dipole pointing in opposite direction to the primary magnetic field. At each RX location (a) (g) the primary and secondary magnetic fields are added to give the total magnetic field. Simplest magnetic field measurement is to measure the angle between total magnetic field and the horizontal. This is called the tilt angle and measurement technique is described below. Work through this example and you should be able to show that a pattern of upward, zero and downward tilt angle will be observed from (a) to (g). 2

Geophysics 223 March 2009 3

Geophysics 223 March 2009 The zero crossing in the tilt angle profile corresponds to the centre of ore body. Note that (a) (g) show the primary, secondary and total magnetic fields in the spatial domain. Quantitative calculation with MATLAB script 424C5_3_tilt_angle.m 4

Geophysics 223 March 2009 D3.1.3 : Data examples The expected variation in tilt angle (up-horizontal-down) is observed in the total magnetic field over the conductor. Example : Telford 7.94 5

Geophysics 223 March 2009 D3.2 : Measurements of amplitude of the total magnetic field Tilt angle measurements such as that shown in D3.1 generally allow us to : Locate a conductive anomaly. Estimate the depth from the width of the tilt angle anomaly. Estimate along strike variations in the strength of a conductor since the magnitude of the conductor will increase the maximum tilt angle observed on a profile However, this type of survey doesn t yield much quantitative information about the properties of the target. In an alternative field strategy, the magnitude of the total magnetic field (H T ) is measured. We will see that this allows us to get quantitative information about the target through the use of characteristic curves (see Geophys 424 for details) Typical systems are initially operated away from a conductor to determine the primary magnetic field, H P. When measurements are made close to the Earth, the total magnetic field is measured and expressed as a percentage change compared to the primary field. For vertical magnetic dipoles (horizontal loops), the survey proceeds with the TX-RX system being moved across the region of interest. This can be with the two loops on a boom carried by the operator (EM31), two loops carried by two field crew (EM34) or with the loops mounted on an aircraft. At each location, the TX is energized and H T measured. The response is plotted at the centre of the TX-RX array and plotted as the percentage change in magnetic field, C = 100 x H T /H P Two factors can change the amplitude of the total magnetic field measured at the RX: (1) Changing the TX-RX offset (typical transmitter fields vary as 1/r 3 ) (2) Moving across a buried conductor Thus changes in the TX- RX offset can mask the effects of basement conductors that we are trying to detect. While the effects of changes in TX-RX offset can be corrected, it is simplest to keep TX-RX offset constant, as in the following example. 6

Geophysics 223 March 2009 EM34 traverse across a vertical conductor The transmitter (TX) is powered at a single frequency. TX and RX are loops connected by a cable and moved along the profile. The loops can be placed in horizontal and vertical configurations. The centre of the TX-RX is placed at each location (a) - (g) the total magnetic field strength is measured. Again, we will assume that the secondary magnetic field is in phase with the primary magnetic field. If TX and RX loops are horizontal, the RX measures the vertical component of the total magnetic field (T z ). Position (a) Primary magnetic field (P) oscillates. Consider the instant in time when the TX magnetic dipole is pointing upwards. P passes downwards through the RX coil (this is always the case in this example). P passes right to left through the conductor. Generates secondary currents confined to the conductor. Currents generate secondary magnetic field (S) equivalent to dipole pointing left-toright. S passes downwards (and to right) through RX P and S in same direction (downwards) at RX. T z > P z Positions (b) and (c) Similar to (a) with signs, but magnitudes of S and T vary. P passes downwards through the RX coil T z > P z Position (d) Secondary magnetic field (S) equivalent to dipole pointing left-to-right, as in (a)-(c) S is parallel to the RX loop and there is no conductor-rx coupling. T z = P z 7

Position (e) Secondary magnetic field (S) equivalent to dipole pointing left-to-right. S passes upwards (and to left) through RX T z < P z Position (f) P is parallel to the conductor and no secondary field (S) is generated. No TX-conductor coupling. T z = P z Position (g) Secondary magnetic field (S) equivalent to dipole pointing right-to-left. P downwards in RX coil S downwards in RX coil T z > P z Similar example is shown in the textbook in Figure X-X 8

9

10

Data example : Telford 7.99 In this example, the total magnetic field is not in phase with the primary field. Hence the total magnetic field has components that are in-phase (0 difference) and in quadrature (90 difference) with the primary magnetic field. 11

The relative magnitudes of these two quantities can be used to determine the conductance and depth of the conductor through the use of characteristic curves (Geophysics 4242, C5.4). Generally good conductors have a response that is in-phase with the primary magnetic field. Thus, the example on the left was for a good conduct D3.3 VLF (Very Low frequency) The final EM method we will consider in this section is the VLF method. It is basically another way of measuring tilt angle. Main difference with the method shown in D3.1 is that a distant radio transmitter is used as an energy source. VLF exploration uses large radio transmitters that were built for marine navigation and military communication. Some transmitters are still used for submarine communications, while a number of Russian transmitters have become unreliable or shut down in recent years. Grimeton VLF transmitter in Sweden is shown above. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/vlf_transmitter_grimeton Why is the low frequency needed for submarine communication? The figures below show the areas in which the signals from two North American transmitters can be detected (McNeill and Labson, 1991). The Cutler transmitter is one of the most powerful in the world (2 MW). 12

Cutler (Maine) Jim Creek (Washington) VLF uses radio signals with a frequency around 12-20 khz. The VLF frequency band is defined as 3-30 KHz and is low in terms of radio communication. However, for EM exploration methods, this is a relatively high frequency. The skin depth equation can be used to estimate penetration depth, and this is generally just a few hundred metres. The VLF field is polarized with the magnetic field normal to the TX-RX path. This is in contrast to magnetotellurics (MT) where the natural EM field generation ensures that signals are arriving from all azimuths. A portable, 1 km long, transmitter can be used to give additional VLF signals at the optimal azimuth. However only one frequency is usually available. Why is this a problem? 13

In the ideal case, the geologic strike of the target points at the TX, which is out of plane in this figure. The magnetic field is parallel to the profile. (Figures on this page from Geonics EM16 manual) More details about the use of the VLF instrument are described in Geophysics 424 section C5.6.1 The Geonics EM16 is the most widely used EM instrument of all time (according to www.geonics.com) 14

Figure above computed with MATLAB script VLF_1.m 15

Example of VLF data from mineral exploration (Telford 7.96) 16

Example of fault mapping with VLF data (Telford 7.97) Airborne VLF systems have been developed (Arcone, 1978 and 1979). Modern VLF instruments automatically measure the amplitudes of both the inphase and quadrature components. VLF is better at mapping horizontal resistivity variations than vertical variations. 17