Publication number: (73) Proprietor:. THE BOEING COMPANY R.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 7E-25 Seattle, WA (US)

Similar documents
(51) Int Cl.: B23K 9/095 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: H02M 1/32 ( ) H05K 5/02 ( ) H02M 5/45 ( ) H02M 5/458 ( ) H02M 7/00 ( )

TEPZZ_94787 B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

TEPZZ 9 449B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION. (51) Int Cl.:

(51) Int Cl.: B42D 25/00 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: B05B 15/02 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G10L 19/24 ( ) G10L 21/038 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G06K 19/07 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: B65D 1/34 ( ) B29C 45/14 ( )

(51) Int Cl. 7 : H04Q 7/32. (56) References cited: US-A

(56) References cited:

(51) Int Cl.: G03B 37/04 ( ) G03B 21/00 ( ) E04H 3/22 ( ) G03B 21/60 ( ) H04N 9/31 ( )

Flight Detector Indicator

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

(51) Int Cl.: G07D 9/00 ( ) G07D 11/00 ( )

^^r" Office europeen des brevets. Publication number:

Lesson 7 Slope-Intercept Formula

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2000/20

EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(51) Int Cl.: G10L 19/14 ( ) G10L 21/02 ( ) (56) References cited:

(51) Int Cl.: G06T 5/00 ( ) H04N 5/232 ( )

TEPZZ 5Z 8 9B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION. (51) Int Cl.: H04W 52/14 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: H04L 12/66 ( ) H04M 19/00 ( ) H04L 12/10 ( ) H04M 11/06 ( ) H04L 12/28 ( )

TEPZZ 7 Z_ 4A T EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G06F 3/0488 ( ) G06F 3/0482 (2013.

(51) Int Cl.: D03D 47/48 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: H04L 27/26 ( )

TEPZZ A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G01S 7/40 ( ) G01S 13/78 (2006.

(51) Int Cl.: B32B 3/04 ( ) B32B 3/06 ( ) F16B 19/00 ( )

TEPZZ B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

TEPZZ 56_495B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G08B 17/107 ( ) G08B 29/24 (2006.

The Groups are invited to answer the following questions under their national laws.

Publication number: A1. int. Ci.5; A61M 25/00, A61 M 25/01

Digiflight II SERIES AUTOPILOTS

A slope of a line is the ratio between the change in a vertical distance (rise) to the change in a horizontal

(51) Int Cl.: H04L 1/00 ( )

E. Slope-Intercept Form and Direct Variation (pp )

Patentamt JEuropaisch.es. European Patent Publication number: Office europeen des brevets ^ ^ EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2006/40

(51) Int Cl.: H02P 25/06 ( ) F04B 35/04 ( ) F04B 49/06 ( )

TEPZZ _64_69B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

*EP A2* EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2002/33

(51) Int Cl.: G10L 19/02 ( ) H04R 5/04 ( ) H04S 1/00 ( ) H04S 3/00 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: B24B 31/06 ( ) B24B 41/06 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: B32B 27/32 ( ) B65D 65/40 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: D21F 11/00 ( ) D21H 27/30 ( ) D21H 27/32 ( ) D21H 27/10 ( ) D21H 21/48 ( )

TEPZZ_9775 B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(51) Int Cl.: H04L 27/18 ( ) H04L 27/20 ( )

System and method for subtracting dark noise from an image using an estimated dark noise scale factor

TEPZZ B_T EP B1 (19) (11) EP B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

Advisory Circular. Precision Approach Path Indicator Harmonization with Instrument Landing System

Operating Handbook For FD PILOT SERIES AUTOPILOTS

(51) Int Cl.: F16D 1/08 ( ) B21D 41/00 ( ) B62D 1/20 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G01V 3/10 ( )

United States Patent (19) [11] Patent Number: 5,746,354

(51) Int Cl.: G10L 21/00 ( ) G10L 17/00 ( ) H04K 1/00 ( ) (56) References cited:

(12) United States Patent

3D Animation of Recorded Flight Data

(51) Int Cl.: B24D 11/00 ( )

y-intercept remains constant?

Publication number: A2. Int. CI.5: H01 L 29/ Meadowridge Drive Garland, Texas 75044(US)

Maria del Carmen ARANA COURREJOLLES

(51) Int Cl.: G06K 7/10 ( )

Appendix III Graphs in the Introductory Physics Laboratory

Digiflight II SERIES AUTOPILOTS

Legal Technology & Innovation. Manuel Meyer, Hariolf Wenzler Journées de formation continue FSA, 31 août 2018

(51) Int Cl.: B05B 7/16 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: B23K 9/095 ( ) B23K 9/10 ( ) B23K 9/32 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G06F 3/041 ( ) H03K 17/96 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G06K 7/10 ( )

CHAPTER 5 AUTOMATIC LANDING SYSTEM

CHICKS DISTANT PSYCHOKINESIS (23 KILOMETRES). (*) René PÉOC'H

LEDs: green = on amber = off blue = pairing red = replace battery. Press the power button to turn on / off.

EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Intel e B60M 1/13. Bayonne, New Jersey (US) Holborn London EC1N2QP (GB)

(51) Int Cl.: H05B 33/08 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G06K 7/10 ( )

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G01S 5/02 ( ) G01S 5/14 ( ) H04L 12/28 (2006.

WA wrippe Z/// (12) United States Patent US 8,091,830 B2. Jan. 10, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: Childs

TEPZZ 5496_6A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: H02J 3/38 ( ) H02M 7/493 (2007.

Imaging Systems for Eyeglass-Based Display Devices

R 233 Philips Res. Rep. 8, , 1953

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2011/40

*EP A2* EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2004/20

(51) Int Cl.: H04B 13/00 ( ) G06G 7/60 ( ) G06N 3/00 ( )

(12) United States Patent

58 Field of Search /341,484, structed from polarization splitters in series with half-wave

Section 2-4: Writing Linear Equations, Including Concepts of Parallel & Perpendicular Lines + Graphing Practice

Classical Control Based Autopilot Design Using PC/104

(12) United States Patent

REPORT INCIDENT. Vertical flight path excursion during ILS approach with autopilot engaged

TEPZZ _7 8Z9A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (51) Int Cl.: G01S 5/06 ( ) G01S 5/02 (2010.

(51) Int Cl.: B41J 2/175 ( )

APSI WIFI, LLC. Company S Monroe Plaza Way Suite A Sandy, UT 84070

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview ISO Third edition Troisième édition

EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2012/33

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

(51) Int Cl.: H04B 7/26 ( )

(51) Int Cl.: G06K 7/10 ( )

TEPZZ 9_Z47 A_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. (43) Date of publication: Bulletin 2015/35

TEPZZ 8 5ZA_T EP A1 (19) (11) EP A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

(12) United States Patent

Transcription:

Patentamt J JEuropàisches ) European Patent Office Office européen des brevets Publication number: 0 054 5 5 3 B1 EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION ( ) Dateof publication of patent spécification: 05.02.86 (Jj) Int. Cl.4: G 05 D 1/12, G 06 F 15/50, (2p ^ Application number: 81901274.1 G 06 G 7/78 Date offiling: 04.05.81 ( ) International application number: PCT/US81/00600 ( ) International publication number: WO 82/00063 07.01.82 Gazette 82/01 (54) AIRCRAFT FLARE PATH CONTROL SIGNAL. ( ) Priority: 24.06.80 US 162451 ( ) Date of publication of application: 30.06.82 Bulletin 82/26 ( ) Publication of the grant of the patent: 05.02.86 Bulletin 86/06 (M) Designated Contracting States: DEFRGBNLSE (73) Proprietor:. THE BOEING COMPANY R.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 7E-25 Seattle, WA 98124 (US) @ Inventor: HANSEN, Rolf 1042-172nd Avenue Northeast Bellevue.WA 98008 (US) Inventor: LAMBREGTS, Antonius Adrianus 19208 Southeast 21 st lssaquah,wa 98027 (US) co m LO o o CL 111 Références cited: US-A-3 295 796 US-A-3333 795 US-A-3 604908 US-A-3 618002 US-A-3626163 US-A-3 652 835 US-A-3967 267 US-A-4006871 US-A-4 106731 US-A-4 141 522 (74) Représentative: Bruin, Cornelis Willem et al OCTROOIBUREAU ARNOLD & SIEDSMA P.O. Box 18558 NL-2502 EN The Hague (NL) Non The file contains technical information submitted afterthe application wasfiled and not included in this spécification Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1 ) European patent convention). Courier Press, Leamington Spa, England.

Background of the invention The present invention pertains to the aircraft guidance art and, more particularly, to a system for controlling aircraft flight during landing flare. A method and apparatus for producing an aircraft flare path control signal comprising: means for producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude; means for producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude rate; and computer means for producing a pitch control surface command signal, is known from US-A- 3.604.908. A critical portion of aircraft landing trajectory is commonly known as flare-out or flare. Flare is that portion of the landing trajectory between the fixed angle glideslope and aircraft runway touchdown. Thus, it is desirable, particularly for commercial aircraft, that the flare profile depart smoothly from the fixed angle glideslope approach providing a smooth transition to runway rollout. In commercial aircraft, attempts have been made at generating landing flare commands to be used either as a flight director to the pilot or for automatic, i.e. autopilot, landing. The problem with these systems, however, is that groundspeed variations affect touchdown dispersion. That is, since aircraft groundspeed is not taken into account, the actual touchdown point of the aircraft on the runway can vary considerably depending on the groundspeed. This is undesirable both for safety reasons and because reduced touchdown dispersion is essential to effective runway utilization and continued aircraft operation under adverse weather conditions. Another problem with existing flare control system is that the flare height from which flare is initiated may be affected by aircraft groundspeed. This has an adverse effect on the ability of the pilot to monitor the system for proper operation and may place the affected by aircraft groundspeed. This has an adverse effect on the ability of the pilot to monitor the system for proper operation and may place the start of the flare ahead of the runway threshold where terrain'features may make it difficult to use radio altimeters. From US-A-3.295.796 a flight control system for controlling the glide slope extension phase of an aircraft landing prior to the flare point is known. Summary of the invention It is an object of the present invention, therefore, to provide apparatus for generating, and a method of producing an aircraft flare path control signal which minimizes touchdown dispersion due to groundspeed variations. It is a further object of the invention to provide the above described apparatus for, and method of generating an aircraft flare path control signal wherein the altitude at which flare is initiated is independent of groundspeed. Briefly, according to the invention, apparatus for producing an aircraft flare path control signal includes a means for producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude. Also, suitable means produces a signal VG representative of aircraft groundspeed and further means produces a signal h representative of aircraft altitude rate. A computer produces a pitch control surface command signal 6er according to the relationship: where Kh, K h, VG REF and hb are constants selected for a given system configuration. A method for producing an aircraft flare path control signal comprises the first step of producing signal h representative of aircraft altitude. Second, a signal VG is produced representative of aircraft groundspeed. Third, a signal h is produced, representative of aircraft altitude rate. Finally, a pitch control surface command signal δec is computed according to the relationship: where Kh, Kh, VG REF and hb are constants selected for a given system configuration. Brief description of the drawings Fig. 1 is a plot of aircraft altitude h versus altitude rate h for the prior art flare-out control system; Fig. 2 is a plot of aircraft altitude h versus runway distance X and shows the touchdown dispersion of the prior art system from its glideslope intercept point; Fig. 3 is a plot of aircraft altitude h versus altitude rate h for an aircraft following a control signal according to the instant invention; and Fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of a system for generating a control signal according to the instant invention. Detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention In one type of flare control law widely used today, the aircraft sinkrate is proportional to altitude. Thus, excluding damping terms, which are a part of any flare equation, the basic exponential flare control law is of the form: where δec=pitch control surface command h=altitude rate, h=altitude, Kh, Kh, hb=constants selected for a particular system configuration. For the condition of a zero pitch control command i.e., the aircraft's servo system reduces the pitch command to zero, the equation takes the following form:

Fig. 1 is a graph of this equation, showing altitude on the vertical axis versus altitude rate, on the horizontal axis. Exemplary values of the various constants are selected, i.e. the value of Kh/Kh; is assumed to be.205 and the value of hb is assumed to be 12. Assuming constant control law parameters, the solution for the above differential equation is The basic controlling equation then becomes and inserting the value for 1/τ, this becomes where where The expression for the flare height from which flare must be initiated to satisfy the above equation is Fig. 1 illustrates this flare height ho for values of 110, 125 and 140 groundspeed knots (203, 231, 253 km/h). Thus, since the flare height ho varies as a function of groundspeed VG (about six feet for a 15 (27 km/h) knot variation in VG) this has an adverse effect on the ability of the pilot to monitor the system for proper operation and may also place the start of the flare ahead of the runway threshold where terrain features may make it difficult to use radio altimeters. Fig. 2 is a plot of aircraft altitude h versus runway position X and illustrates the distance XTD between the aircraft actual touchdown point and the glideslope intercept point with the runway. It is assumed that the aircraft is on a glideslope angle β and that flare is initiated at the alitutude ho, which is approximately 42 feet. The total distance is expressed analytically as Thus it is evident, assuming a constant hb, T and β, that, as with flare height altitude ho, the dispersion distance XTD is a function of groundspeed VG. For example, the touchdown distance XTD varies about 200 feet (61 m) for a fifteen knot (27 km/h) variation in VG, a significant deviation considering the dispersion due to all other sources. In the development of the instant invention, it was recognized that if the product (VGT) in the equations for flare height ho and touchdown XTD is kept a constant, then both ho and XTD will be invariant for a varying VG. This requires that This control law is shown graphically in Fig. 3. Plots are made for three different groundspeeds, as before 110, 125 and 140 knots (203, 231, 253 km/h). It is apparent from this graph that the flare height ho is no longer dependent on groundspeed VG. Fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of the apparatus for producing the aircraft flare path control signal in accordance with this newly derived control law. Here, an altitude block 10 produces an output signal h representative of aircraft altitude. A suitable means for producing the altitude signal hiis commonly available in commercial aircraft and, as such, will not be discussed here. The altitude signal h is passed to a pair of summers 12, 14. Also passed to an input of summer 12 is the output from block 16. Block 16 produces a fixed signal corresponding to the altitude height for flare initiation ho. As discussed above, in a system according to the instant invention the flare initiation altitude ho is constant regardless of groundspeed variations. The summer 12 acts to subtract the signal ho from the signal h such that its output is negative if and only if the aircraft altitude has dropped below the flare initiation altitude. Upon this occurrence, a logic circuit 18 activates a switch 20 which causes the pitch flare command signal δec, which is produced in a manner discussed herein below,-to be coupled to the aircraft's flight dynamics. The pitch control command signal δec is computed as follows. The altitude signal h is summed with a constant signal hb supplied from block 30. Thus, the output from summer 14 is of the form h+hb. This signal is applied as one input to a multiplier 32. The groundspeed block 40 produces an output signal VG corresponding to aircraft groundspeed. Such groundspeed signals VG are commonly provided on commercial aircraft and, as such, will not be discussed here. The groundspeed signal VG is multiplied by a factor 1NG REF in block 42. The signal 1/VG REF is a constant value depending upon a particular system configuration. The signal out of block 42 is then multiplied by a gain factor Kh/Kh in block 44. Both Kh and Kh are constants selected for a particular system configuration. Thus, the output from block 44 is a signal having a value

This signal is then applied to the remaining input of multiplier 32 where it is multiplied by the signal h+hb. The output from multiplier 32 is summed in a summer 46 with the output from altitude rate block 48. Altitude rate block 48 produces an altitude rate sighal h which, as with the altitude block 10 and groundspeed block 40 is commonly provided in commercial aircraft. The output from summer 46 is multiplied by a gain factor Kh in gain block 50. The factor K; is a constant dependent upon a given system configuration. Thus, the signal at the output from gain block 50 is This signal is, then, the desired improved control law signal. In all aircraft flight guidance control systems, there are certain control law damping signals which are used to dampen short and long term oscillations. These are well understood by those skilled in this art and, as such, will not be discussed here. Hence, the control law damping terms are summed with the control signal in a summer circuit 52 before being passed as the output pitch flare command signal δec. It should be understood that the pitch flare command signal may be used in the aircraft either as an input to the flight director to indicate to the pilot a desired aircraft pitch angle or it may be coupled directly to the aircraft's autopilot for automatic control of aircraft flare-out. In summary, apparatus for, and the method of producing an improved aircraft flare path control signal has been described. This signal is adapted to control aircraft flareout such that the landing flare distance remains constant despite conditions of varying airspeeds or groundspeeds. In addition, the flare height ho remains constant despite groundspeed variations. 1. Apparatus for producing an aircraft flare path control signal comprising: means for producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude; means for producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude rate; and computer means for producing a pitch control surface command signal, characterized in that means are provided for producing a signal VG representative of aircraft groundspeed; and in that a pitch control surface command signal δec according to the relationship: 2. A method for producing an aircraft flare path control signal comprising the steps of: producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude; producing a signal h representative of aircraft altitude rate; and computing a pitch control surface command signal, characterized by producing a signal VG representative of aircraft groundspeed; and by computing a pitch control surface command signal δec according to the relationship: where Kh, Kh, VG REF and hb are constants selected for a given system configuration. 1. Einrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Flugzeugausschwebewegsteuer- bzw. -regelsignals, umfassend: eine Einrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Signals h, das für die Flugzeughöhe repräsentativ ist; eine Einrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Signals h, das für die Flugzeughöhenrate repräsentativ ist; und eine Rechnereinrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Nicksteuer- bzw. -regelbodenbefehlssignals, dadurch gekennzeichnet, eine Einrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Signals VG vorgesehen ist, welches für die Geschwindigkeit des Flugzeugs über Grund repräsentativ ist; und daß ein Nicksteuer- bzw. -regelbodenbefehlssignal δec gemäß der Beziehung erzeugt wird, worin Kh, Kh, VG REF und hb für eine gegebene Systemkonfiguration gewählte Konstanten sind. 2. Verfahren zum Erzeugen eines Flugzeugausschwebewegsteuer- bzw. -regelsignals, umfassend die folgende Schritte: Erzeugen eines Signals h, das für die Flugzeughöhe repräsentativ ist; Erzeugen eines Signals h, das für die Flugzeughöhenrate repräsentativ ist; und Brechnen einer Nicksteuer- bzw. -regelbodenbefehlssignals, gekennzeichnet, durch das Erzeugen eines Signals VG, das für die Geschwindigkeit des Flugzeugs über Grund repräsentativ ist; und das Berechnen eines Nicksteuer- bzw. -regelbodenbefehlssignals δec gemäß der Beziehung: worin Kh, Kh, VG REF und hb für eine gegebene Systemkonfiguration gewählte Konstanten sind. where Kh, Kh, VG REF and hb are constants selected for a given system configuration is produced. 1. Appareil destiné à produire un signal de

commande de la trajectoire d'arrondi de l'arénef, comprenant: un moyen servant à produire un signal h représentatif de l'altitude de l'aéronef; un moyen servant à produire un signal h représentatif de la vitesse de variation de l'altitude de l'aéronef; et un moyen calculateur servant à produire un signal d'instruction de la gouverne de commande de tangage, caractérisé en ce que des moyens sont prévus pour produire un signal VG représentatif de la vitesse de l'aéronef par rapport au sol; et en ce qu'il est produit un signal δec d'instruction de la gouverne de commande de tangage selon la relation: où Kh, Kh, VG REF et hb sont des constantes choisies pour une configuration donnée du système. 2. Procédé de production d'un signal de commande de la trajectoire d'arrondi d'un aéronef, comprenant les opérations suivantes: produire un signal h représentatif de l'altitude de l'aéronef; produire un signal h représentatif de la vitesse de variation de l'altitude de l'aéronef; et calculer un signal d'instruction de la gouverne de commande de tangage, caractérise par la production d'un signal VG représentatif de la vitesse de l'aéronef par rapport au sol, et par le calcul d'un signal δec selon la relation: où Kh, Kh, VG REF et hb sont des constantes choisies pour une configuration donnée du système.