LAW Patent Office Litigation Fall 2017
|
|
|
- Moris May
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LAW Patent Office Litigation Fall 2017 The recent passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) has shifted the battleground of certain patent challenges from district court to the USPTO by creating new, more powerful, fasttrack, litigation-like review proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and the transitional program for covered business method patents. This course will cover practical aspects of how patent office litigation proceedings are used on their own and in conjunction with district court litigation to achieve client aims. The course also explores the interface between the proceedings and the district courts, the USITC, and the Federal Circuit, presents hypothetical scenarios addressing situations that are expected to occur, and provides an overview of comparable proceedings in selected countries to provide students with an international perspective. The course will involve lecture with frequent opportunities for student input and consideration of how to counsel clients on available patent office litigation options and limitations. Practical strategies and case studies will be used. Patent Law I and II are recommended but not required for this course. Instructors: Michael Messinger Tel: (202) (o) mikem@skgf.com Joseph Mutschelknaus Tel: (202) (o) jmutsche@skgf.com Class Hours: Mondays 8:00-9:50 PM Final Exam: December 9, 2017 at 12:00 PM. The exam is closed-book. All work must be your own. Classroom: Hazel Hall 225 Recommended Textbook: Patent Office Litigation (Second Edition) by Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. (published by Thomson Reuters Westlaw) Other Sources: PTAB: PTAB E2E general: Page 1 of 5
2 appeal-board/trials/patent-trial-and-appeal-board-end.html PRPS search for a case: PTAB Trial Rules General: Last updated August 9, 2017 Office Patent Trial Guide: Umbrella Rules: IPR, PGR and CBM rules: CBM and TI definitions: Derivation Proceedings: Interferences: USPTO AIA FAQs: Representative PTAB Orders, Decision, and Notices: Patent Trial and Appeal Fees: Grading: Final Exam, Class Participation Schedule: Week 1 (Monday, August 21, 2017): So You Want to Challenge a Patent? Discussion Topics: IPX, EPX, IPR, PGR, CBM Issues: Threshold, Timing, Scope of Review, Estoppel, Discovery, Sanctions Readings: POL 2 Petition for a Writ of Certiorari by Oil States Energy and Brief of respondent Greene s Energy Group, review both for Question #1 only Found at ( Post-Grant Challenges Review Cheat Sheet, Page 2 of 5
3 Week 2 (Monday, August 28, 2017): Petition for IPR/Pre-filing Considerations (Part 1) Readings: POL 3:1-3:33 Shaw Industries Group Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems Inc., 817 F.3d 1293 (Fed. Cir. 2016) In re Magnum Oil Tools International Ltd., Case No (Fed. Cir. July 25, 2016) HP Co. v. U.S. Phillips Corp. et al., IPR , Paper 15, (January 19, 2016) Week 3 (Monday, September 4, 2017): Labor Day University Closed Week 4 (Monday, September 11, 2017): Petition for IPR/Pre-filing Considerations (Part 2) Readings: POL 3:34-3:49 Customplay, LLC v. Clearplay, Inc., IPR , Paper 9, Nov. 7, 2014 Conopco, Inc. dba Unlivever, v. The Proctor & Gamble Company, IPR , Paper 21, Oct. 20, 2014 Unified Patents, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC, IPR , Paper 13, July 24, 2014 Week 5 (Monday, September 18, 2017): Petition for IPR/Pre-filing Considerations (Part 3) Readings: POL 3:50-3:60 Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC. v. Xilinx, Inc., IPR , Paper 12, Jan. 24, 2013 Motorola Mobility LLC v. Arnouse, IPR , Paper 20, Jan. 30, 2013 Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., IPR , Paper 20, Feb. 12, 2013 Macauto U.S.A. v. Baumeister & Ostler GmbH & Co., IPR , Paper 6, Sept. 21, 2012 Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., IPR , Paper 5, Sept. 27, 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR , Paper 14, Oct. 26, 2012 Week 6 (Monday, September 25, 2017): Patent Owner Preliminary Response/Institution of Trial Discussion Topics: Deadline, Scheduling Order, Motions List, Timeline Intro. Readings: POL 6 Microstrategy, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., IPR , Paper 23, Apr. 22, 2013 Dell, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecomms. Res. Inst., IPR , Paper 10, Mar. 26, 2015 Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance Corp., CBM , Paper 28, May 14, 2015 Page 3 of 5
4 Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., CBM , Paper 7, Oct. 25, 2012 Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., CBM , Paper 8, Oct. 25, 2012 Week 7 (Monday, October 2, 2017): Trial Timeline Detail: Joinder, Petitioner Discovery, PO Discovery, Supp/Reply Readings: POL 3:62-63 Patent Office Trial Practice Guide Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR , Paper 15, Feb. 25, 2013 Kyocera Corp. v. Softview LLC, IPR , Paper 15, Apr. 24, 2013 Target v. Destination Maternity, IPR , Paper 18, Sept. 25, 2014 Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR , Paper 18, Dec. 21, 2012 SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Dev. Group, Inc., CBM , Paper 37, Jan. 9, 2013 Garmin Int'l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC, IPR , Paper 16, Jan. 9, 2013 Week 8 (Tuesday, October 10, 2017): Discovery: Mandatory/Routine; Additional Discovery; Inconsistent Information Readings: POL 4, 7 Garmin Int'l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC, IPR , Paper 26, Mar. 5, 2013 LKQ Corp. v. Clearlamp, LLC, IPR , Paper 17, Mar. 5, 2013 Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR , Paper 32, Mar. 8, 2013 Garmin Int'l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC, IPR , Paper 34, Mar. 14, 2013 Bloomberg Inc. v. Markets-Alert Pty Ltd., CBM , Paper 32, May 29, 2013 Corning Inc. v. DSM IP Assets B.V., IPR , Paper 27, June 21, 2013 Week 9 (Monday, October 16, 2017): Discovery: Depositions Readings: POL 9:1-9:183 Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Limited, IPR , Paper 55, Aug. 7, 2013 Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., IPR , Paper 41, Aug. 23, 2013 Week 10 (Monday, October 23, 2017): Deposition Exercise Readings: Prepare for deposition exercise Week 11 (Monday, October 30, 2017): Motions, Petitioner Reply Readings: POL 5, 8 CRS Adv. Techs., Inc. v. Frontline Techs., Inc., CBM , Paper 31, Feb. 13, 2013 Nichia Corp. v. Emcore Corp., IPR , Paper 27, June 3, 2013 Page 4 of 5
5 Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR , Paper 26, June 11, 2013 Int'l Flavors & Fragrances Inc. v. The United States of America, IPR , Paper 12, May 20, 2014 Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC v. PPC Broadband, Inc., IPR , Paper 19, Oct. 30, 2014 MasterImage 3D, Inc. v. RealD Inc., IPR , Paper 42, July 15, 2015 Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Tech., Inc., 807 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2015) Redline Detection v. Star Envirotech, 811 F.3d 435 (Fed. Cir. 2015) Week 12 (Monday, November 6, 2017): Settlement/Hearing/Final Decision/Reconsideration Readings: POL Macauto U.S.A. v. Bos GmbH & KG, IPR , Paper 21, Feb. 4, 2013 Int'l Business Machines Corp. v. Financial Systems Tech Pty. Ltd., IPR , Paper 7, Feb. 8, 2013 Blackberry Corporation and Blackberry Limited v. MobileMedia LLC, IPR , Paper 31, Dec. 11, 2013 Week 13 (Monday, November 13, 2017): Post-Grant Review / Covered Business Method (CBM) / Foreign procedures Readings: POL 23 Versata Development Group, Inc., v. SAP America, Inc., 793 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2015) Google v. Unwired Planet, 841 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Week 14 (Monday, November 20, 2017): Appeals/Pending Legislation Readings: POL 12, 15 Cuozzo Speed Tech. v. Lee, No , slip op. (SCOTUS June 20, 2016) Week 15 (Monday, November 27, 2017): So You Want to Challenge a Patent? Final exam review Readings: Guide to Navigating the Process under the New PTO Rules Final Exam: Monday, December 9, 2017 at 12:00 PM _2.docx Page 5 of 5
Recommended Textbook: Patent Office Litigation by Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. (published by Thomson Reuters Westlaw)
LAW 306 - Patent Office Litigation Fall 2016 The recent passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) has shifted the battleground of certain patent challenges from district court to the USPTO by
Algae Biomass Summit 2014: Patent Strategies for Algae Companies in an Era of Patent Reform Peter A. Jackman, Esq. October 2, 2014
Algae Biomass Summit 2014: Patent Strategies for Algae Companies in an Era of Patent Reform Peter A. Jackman, Esq. October 2, 2014 2013 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox P.L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. Why
THE LEGAL MARKETPLACE IN AN EVOLVING PATENT LANDSCAPE
THE LEGAL MARKETPLACE IN AN EVOLVING PATENT LANDSCAPE A partnership between Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute and Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. * Intellectual Property continues to
AGENDA/SYLLABUS [File01 on USB drive]
![AGENDA/SYLLABUS [File01 on USB drive]](/thumbs/92/109519908.jpg "AGENDA/SYLLABUS [File01 on USB drive]")
AGENDA/SYLLABUS [File01 on USB drive] Advanced Patent Law Seminar March 5-6, 2015 21C Museum Hotel, Cincinnati, Ohio Instructors: Donald S. Chisum and Janice M. Mueller Chisum Patent Academy 2015 Topics
Evolving PTAB Trial Practice: Navigating Complex Procedural Rules
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Evolving PTAB Trial Practice: Navigating Complex Procedural Rules Strategically Using Routine and Additional Discovery, Requests for Joinder, and
Post-Grant for Practitioners
Trends, Topics, and Viewpoints from the PTAB AIA Trial Roundtable Karl Renner Dorothy Whelan Webinar Series May 14, 2014 Agenda #fishwebinar @FishPostGrant I. Overview of Webinar Series II. Statistics
Key Strategies for Your IP Portfolio
Key Strategies for Your IP Portfolio Jeremiah B. Frueauf, Partner Where s the value?! Human capital! Physical assets! Contracts, Licenses, Relationships! Intellectual Property Patents o Utility, Design
Ryan N. Phelan. Tel
Ryan N. Phelan Partner Tel 312.474.6607 rphelan@marshallip.com Ryan N. Phelan is a registered patent attorney who counsels and works with clients in intellectual property (IP) matters, with a focus on
Protect Your Innovation and Maximize Your Investment Return in Automotive Electronics
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Protect Your Innovation and Maximize Your Investment Return in Automotive Electronics Presented by Shaobin Zhu SEMICON (Shanghai) March 20, 2013 SEMICON
Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CORPORATE COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2015 Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage Brad Botsch Isabella Fu Heather D. Redmond Adam V. Floyd Charlene
Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future. June 12, 2018
Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future June 12, 2018 Rob Reckers Fiona Bell 2 Trends in Patent Litigation: Cases Filed 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000
U.S. PATENT LITIGATION TRAINING PROGRAM FOR ASIAN CORPORATIONS. September 22-26, finnegan, henderson, farabow, garrett & dunner, llp 901
china india japan U.S. PATENT LITIGATION TRAINING PROGRAM FOR ASIAN CORPORATIONS September 22-26, 2014 korea taiwan united states finnegan, henderson, farabow, garrett & dunner, llp 901 new york avenue,
Frank A. Angileri Shareholder, Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings Michigan Office P (248)
Frank Angileri Brooks Kushman Frank A. Angileri Shareholder, Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings Michigan Office P (248) 226-2829 fangileri@brookskushman.com Frank`s practice focuses on intellectual property
Why Design Patents Are Surviving Post-Grant Challenges
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Why Design Patents Are Surviving Post-Grant
Patent Prosecution & Strategic Patent Counseling
Patent Prosecution & Strategic Patent Counseling Since our founding in 1878, we have represented some of the world s greatest innovators, including Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, and the Wright
THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS By Sharon Israel and Kyle Friesen I. Introduction The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ( AIA ) 1 marks the most sweeping
Paper Entered: 2 February 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 8 571-272-7822 Entered: 2 February 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD WANGS ALLIANCE CORPORATION d/b/a WAC LIGHTING CO., Petitioner,
COURSE SCHEDULE
2018-2019 COURSE SCHEDULE Fall 1 Seven-Week: Aug. 27 Oct. 12, 2018 Business Formation & Structure -11:40am Legal & Regulatory Process ` Patent Business Formation & Structure -11:40am Research in, Business
REPORT FROM THE FRONT LINES: PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
Design At Work USPTO Design Day 2018 REPORT FROM THE FRONT LINES: PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS George Raynal Saidman DesignLaw Group INTER PARTES REVIEW POST GRANT REVIEW SUPPLEMENTAL EXAMINATION REEXAMINATION
Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation?
Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation? Chad Pannell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Email: cpannell@kilpatricktownsend.com Presented to April 12, 2017 2017 Kilpatrick Townsend Roadmap NPE Litigation
Partner 2323 VICTORY AVENUE SUITE 700 DALLAS, TX T F
david.mccombs@haynesboone.com PRACTICES: Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Litigation, International, Asia, Patent Prosecution and Counseling, Patents, Patent Litigation, Patent Office Trials,
Patent Armoring Via Reissue Proceedings
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Patent Armoring Via Reissue Proceedings Law360, New
2015 MIPLA Stampede: Post-Grant Strategies for Attacking & Defending Issued Patents
2015 MIPLA Stampede: Post-Grant Strategies for Attacking & Defending Issued Patents Presented by: Kurt Niederluecke, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. Adam Steinert, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. Copyright 2015 The
McRO Syncs Automation Software With Patent Eligibility
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com McRO Syncs Automation Software With Patent
PTAB At 5: Part 2 Patents That Survive PTAB Scrutiny
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com PTAB At 5: Part 2 Patents That Survive PTAB
John D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group
John D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group john.denkenberger@cojk.com direct: 206.695.1749 Professional Overview John Denkenberger is a co-managing member of COJK, serves on the
September 14, Post-Grant for Practitioners. Inter Partes Review (IPR) of Design Patents. Jim Babineau Principal. Craig Deutsch Associate
September 14, 2016 Post-Grant for Practitioners Inter Partes Review (IPR) of Design Patents Jim Babineau Principal Craig Deutsch Associate Overview #FishWebinar @FishPostGrant Where? see invitation How
Life Sciences IP Report
Life Sciences IP Report Facts & Analysis In Partnership With 2017 Consero Group. Reproduction Prohibited. January 2017 Introduction Life Sciences IP Report The competitive advantage for businesses in the
Patent Masters Symposium
Patent Masters Symposium A part of the IPWatchdog Institute Program Agenda * Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2018 8:30am to 9:00am Registration & Continental fast 9:00am to 9:15am Gene Quinn: Welcome & Introductions
Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD CARE N CARE INSURANCE COMPANY and TRIZETTO CORPORATION, Petitioners v. INTEGRATED CLAIMS SYSTEMS, LLC, Patent Owner Case
Google reveal. their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy. Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google
Google reveal their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google Catherine Lacavera is the Director of IP and Litigation at Google. Named one of
Paper Entered: January 27, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 65 571-272-7822 Entered: January 27, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ST. JUDE MEDICAL, CARDIOLOGY DIVISION, INC., Petitioner,
Paper Entered: April 1, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 24 571 272 7822 Entered: April 1, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UBISOFT, INC. and UBISOFT ENTERTAINMENT SA, Petitioner,
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD CARE N CARE INSURANCE COMPANY and TRIZETTO CORPORATION, Petitioners v. INTEGRATED CLAIMS SYSTEMS, LLC, Patent Owner Case
11th Annual Patent Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1316 11th Annual Patent Law Institute Co-Chairs Scott M. Alter Douglas R. Nemec John M. White To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at
Patent Masters Symposium A part of the IPWatchdog Institute
Patent Masters Symposium A part of the IPWatchdog Institute Program Agenda * Monday, March 25, 2019 8:30am to 9:00am Registration & Continental fast 9:00 to 9:15am Gene Quinn: Welcome & Introductions Session
Post-Grant Review in Japan
Post-Grant Review in Japan Houston, January 30, 2018 Toshifumi Onuki International Activities Center Japan Patent Attorneys Association Peter Schechter Partner Osha Liang LLP Post-Grant Review in Japan
Conducting and Analyzing Patent Searches
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Conducting and Analyzing Patent Searches Strategies for Validity, Patentability, Infringement, FTO and State-of-the-Art Searches THURSDAY, MARCH
Patent Masters Symposium A part of the IPWatchdog Institute
Patent Masters Symposium A part of the IPWatchdog Institute Program Agenda * Monday, March 25, 2019 8:30am to 9:00am Registration & Continental Breakfast 9:00am to 9:15am Gene Quinn: Welcome & Introductions
Why patents DO matter to YOUR business
Why patents DO matter to YOUR business Dr Simone Mitchell & Alexandra Chubb DLA Piper 19 March 2015 Overview This session will cover: how to identify when patent protection should be obtained to protect
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Appellant v. ERICSSON INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, GOOGLE INC.,
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner. CHANBOND LLC Patent Owner
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND LLC Patent Owner Patent No. 7,941,822 B2 PETITIONER S RESPONSE TO PO
The America Invents Act: Policy Rationales. Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013
The America Invents Act: Policy Rationales Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013 Background Work began in 2005 15 hearings before House Judiciary Committee, or Subcommittee on Courts, the
Aaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law.
Milwaukee Office p 414.271.7590 e aarono@andruslaw.com Aaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law. Aaron handles a wide variety of intellectual
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEALS BOARD CARE N CARE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and TRIZETTO CORPORATION, Petitioners v. INTEGRATED CLAIMS SYSTEMS, LLC, Patent Owner
Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012
Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law April 30, 2012 Panel Members Moderator: Robb Evans, Business Process Management & Strategy, Global Patent Solutions LLC
Bas de Blank. Representative Engagements. Partner Silicon Valley T E
Practice Areas Intellectual Property U.S. International Trade Commission Patents IP Counseling & Due Diligence Trade Secrets Litigation Honors Top Verdict of the Year awarded by The Daily Journal and The
Paper No Entered: November 6, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 44 571.272.7822 Entered: November 6, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v.
Recreation Facility Hours
NORMAL HOURS Recreation Facility Hours August 1, 2016 July 31, 2017 Last Revised: July 29, 2016 Effective Dates 2016: AUG 23 31, SEP 1 2, SEP 6 16, SEP 18 23, SEP 25 30, OCT 1 7, OCT 9 18, OCT 24 30, NOV
2016 EDITION PRACTICE PERSPECTIVES: VAULT S GUIDE TO LEGAL PRACTICE AREAS. Edited by Matthew J. Moody, Esq.
2016 EDITION PRACTICE PERSPECTIVES: VAULT S GUIDE TO LEGAL PRACTICE AREAS Edited by Matthew J. Moody, Esq. IP Boutiques Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox P.L.L.C. Deborah Sterling, Director Bio/Chemical
Clark A.D. Wilson. Senior Counsel. Practices. Industries
Clark A.D. Wilson Senior Counsel Atlanta 191 Peachtree Street NE Suite 3800 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 cwilson@merchantgould.com D 404.954.5087 Clark Wilson, an attorney in the Atlanta office, is interested
The Patent Trial of The Century?
Apple v. Samsung: The Rise of Design IP Christopher V. Carani, Esq. Chicago USA Global IP & Innovation Summit Shanghai, China September 4, 2013 The Patent Trial of The Century? 2 1 Largest Patent Infringement
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND LLC Patent Owner
Paper 13 Filed: May 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND LLC Patent Owner Case IPR2016-01744 Patent 7,941,822
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit PPC BROADBAND, INC., Appellant v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS RF, LLC, Appellee 2015-1361, 2015-1366, 2015-1368, 2015-1369 Appeals from the United
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD AMAZON.COM, INC. & LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., - vs.
Paper No. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD AMAZON.COM, INC. & LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., - vs. - Petitioners PRAGMATUS MOBILE LLC, Patent Owner
Lisa A. Dolak Senior Vice President and University Secretary Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law
Lisa A. Dolak Senior Vice President and University Secretary Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law Book Chapters The Ethics of Patent Assertion: Does Purpose Matter?, in IP MONETIZATION AND INVESTMENT 2017:
Welcome. Recent Developments in Intellectual Property Law. December 13, 2012
Welcome Recent Developments in Intellectual Property Law December 13, 2012 Husch Blackwell LLP Leading Intellectual Property Cases of 2012 and Effects on Litigation Strategy By: Nathan Oleen Husch Blackwell
R. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner
R. Cameron Garrison Managing Partner cgarrison@lathropgage.com KANSAS CITY 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 2200 Kansas City, MO 64108 T: 816.460.5566 F: 816.292.2001 Assistant Debbie Adams 816.460.5346 PRACTICE
WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Howard E. POLINER Attorney & Advocate PO Box 3419 Jerusalem 91033 Israel Telephone: +972 2 646 6539 Fax: +972 2 643 6335 E-mail:
5 th Annual Pharma IPR Conference 2016
5 th Annual Pharma IPR Conference 2016 9 11 March 2016, Mumbai DAY 1 : 9 th March 2016 Country: US 09:40 American Invents Act Updates on Americas Invents Act and current scenario of US Patent laws Implications
Why patents DO matter to YOUR business
Why patents DO matter to YOUR business Robynne Sanders & Eliza Mallon DLA Piper 18 March 2015 Overview This session will cover: how to identify when patent protection should be obtained to protect your
Introduction to Intellectual Property
Introduction to Intellectual Property October 20, 2015 Matthew DeSanto Assistant to Mindy Bickel, NYC Engagement Manager United States Patent and Trademark Office Outline Types of Intellectual Property
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Paper No. Filed July 25, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner v. MONOSOL RX, LLC Patent Owner Case
MPEP Breakdown Course
MPEP Breakdown Course MPEP Chapter Worksheet The MPEP Breakdown training course will provide you with a clear vision of what the Patent Bar is all about along with many tips for passing it. It also covers
Larry R. Laycock. Education. Practice Focus. Attorney at Law Shareholder
Larry R. Laycock Attorney at Law Shareholder Larry has extensive experience as lead trial counsel in complex and intellectual property litigation. His practice includes patent, trademark, trade secret,
Date: August 27, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. ionroad LTD.
Trials@uspto.gov Paper No.17 571-272-7822 Date: August 27, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ionroad LTD., Petitioner, v. MOBILEYE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
ASIP News. In this Isuue. ASIP held a workshop on the occasion of the World IP Day 2016
ASIP Newsletter - Issue3 May 2016 ASIP News In this Isuue ASIP held a workshop on the occasion of the World IP Day 2016 Under the patronage of HE Dr. Talal Abu-Ghazaleh, the Arab Society for Intellectual
Invalidity Challenges After KSR and Bilski
Invalidity Challenges After KSR and Bilski February 24, 2010 Presenters Steve Tiller and Greg Stone Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP 7 St. Paul Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202-1636 (410) 347-8700 stiller@wtplaw.com
December 2014 USPTO Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility. Effect on Software Patents. January 16, 2015 SKGF.COM
December 2014 USPTO Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility Effect on Software Patents January 16, 2015 Three-part webinar series on subject matter eligibility in ex parte examination 2014 Interim
April 1, Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure
April 1, 2008 Client Alert Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure by James G. Gatto On March 28, 2008, the Federal Circuit affirmed
Merriann M. Panarella, Esq. Panarella Dispute Resolution Services P.O. Box Wellesley, MA
Merriann M. Panarella, Esq. Panarella Dispute Resolution Services P.O. Box 812179 Wellesley, MA 02482 mpanarella@panarellaadr.com 508 653-2455 Dispute Resolution Services Dispute resolution services include
Recent Developments in Patent Law Fall 2017
PRESENTED AT 22 nd Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute November 2-3, 2017 Austin, TX Recent Developments in Patent Law Fall 2017 Mark A. Lemley Jason Reinecke James Yoon T U T S L C L E utcle.org RECENT
Post-Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Post-Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board PLI S COMPLETE LIBRARY OF TREATISE TITLES ART LAW Art Law: The Guide for Collectors, Investors, Dealers & Artists BANKING & COMMERCIAL LAW
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Paper No. Date Filed: August 8, 2013 Filed on behalf of: Medtronic, Inc. By: Justin J. Oliver MEDVASCIPR@fchs.com (202) 530-1010 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL
Thomas L. Duston. Tel
Thomas L. Duston Partner Tel 312.423.3446 tduston@marshallip.com Tom Duston is a hands-on trial lawyer who focuses on patent litigation for some of the world's most sophisticated companies. With nearly
The Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents
The Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents SD Times March 24, 2010 Yoches, E. Robert, Arner, Erika Harmon, Dubal, Uttam G. Protecting and enforcing IP rights in a high-speed world The world
Jeffrey S. Sharp Managing Partner
Jeffrey S. Sharp Managing Partner Tel 312.474.9578 jsharp@marshallip.com Jeffrey S. Sharp is the Managing Partner of the Firm. He is a registered patent attorney with more than 30 years of experience in
Navigating Functionality in Design Patent Prosecution and Litigation
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Navigating Functionality in Design Patent Prosecution and Litigation Evaluating Ornamentality vs. Functionality, Overcoming Obviousness Challenges,
Paper 24 Tel: Entered: February 8, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 24 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: February 8, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ERICSSON INC. AND TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON,
Oil States Energy Services v. Greene s Energy Group: The Future of Inter Partes Review and Its Impact on the Energy Sector
Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal Volume 3 Number 6 March 2018 Oil States Energy Services v. Greene s Energy Group: The Future of Inter Partes Review and Its Impact on the Energy Sector
SPRING. FALL There will be no classes Wyndham Championship Week (August 13-19) CAMPS. Visit us online at: Summer. Winter
PLAYer Session 1: Mondays (April 9 - May 14) or Wednesdays (April 11 - May 16) PLAYer Session 2: Mondays (May 21 June 25 Makeup) or Wednesdays (May 23 June 27) Par Session 1: Mondays (April 9 - May 14)
Lisa A. Dolak. Senior VP and University Secretary; Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law. Publications
Lisa A. Dolak Senior VP and University Secretary; Angela S. Cooney Professor of Law Publications Chapters in Books: Don t Check Your Ethics at the Door: The Ethical Implications of Legal Service Outsourcing,
The problem with software patents
The problem with software patents Software Patents Volume & Inability to Properly Review and Identify Prior Art Quality & Numbers Utility/Necessity, Pace of Change & Period of Protection Anti-Innovation
Required Text: There is no required text for this class.
Advanced Legal Research 982-51 Tuesday 6:30-9:15 pm Room 312 Spring 2008 Michael Whiteman (Office Telephone: 572-5717 E-mail: whiteman@nku.edu) Emily Janoski-Haehlen (Office Telephone: 572-6485 E-mail:
2017 Author Biographies
2017 Author Biographies Rouget F. (Ric) Henschel Chapter 1: The State of the Law of Claim Construction and Infringement Rouget F. (Ric) Henschel is a partner at Foley & Lardner LLP. He is a member of the
TRENDS IN IP DISPUTES
ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL LITIGATION COMMITTEE APRIL 25, 2017 TRENDS IN IP DISPUTES DAVID YURKERWICH MANAGING DIRECTOR IP PRACTICE LEADER 1 AGENDA Patent infringement and IPR filing trends Operating
Baldassare Vinti is a partner in the Patent Law and Intellectual Property Groups.
Contact Baldassare Vinti Partner New York +1.212.969.3249 bvinti@proskauer.com Baldassare Vinti is a partner in the Patent Law and Intellectual Property Groups. Baldo s practice focuses on litigating patent,
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. WANGS ALLIANCE CORPORATION D/B/A WAC LIGHTING CO.
Filed on behalf of Wangs Alliance Corporation By: David C. Radulescu, Ph.D., Reg. No. 36,250 Angela Chao, Reg. No. 71,991 RADULESCU LLP Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6910 New York, NY 10118
USPTO and the Texas Regional Office
USPTO and the Texas Regional Office USPTO Offices Detroit Operational since July 2012 Denver Byron G. Rogers Federal Building Operational since July 2014 Silicon Valley San Jose City Hall Building Operational
Developments in Intellectual Property
IP Impact Silicon Valley November 6 th, 2014 Developments in Intellectual Property John Cabeca Director of the Silicon Valley USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Office John.Cabeca@uspto.gov UPSTO
2012 Annual Convention
2012 Annual Convention Your Guide to the America Invents Act: Trademark Enforcement for Small Businesses and Dynamics for Personal Motivation and Chemical Addiction Intellectual Property Section 1.5 General,
2010/IPEG/SYM/007 IP Commercialization in Korea - From Research and Development to Commercialization
2010/IPEG/SYM/007 IP Commercialization in Korea - From Research and Development to Commercialization Submitted by: Korea Innovating Intellectual Property Exploitation Symposium Sendai, Japan 9 September
Intellectual Property Law Alert
Intellectual Property Law Alert A Corporate Department Publication February 2013 This Intellectual Property Law Alert is intended to provide general information for clients or interested individuals and
ALLAN HORWICH. CURRICULUM VITAE (March 2018)
ALLAN HORWICH CURRICULUM VITAE (March 2018) Professor of Practice, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, 2013 - present Senior Lecturer, Northwestern University School of Law, 2000 2013 Partner, Schiff
WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS
WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW! VOLUME!13! SUMMER!2013! NUMBER!3! IMPACT OF THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT Justin Nifong I. SCOPE OF PRACTIONER S NOTE... 340! II. AMERICA INVENTS
Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System
Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System Bronwyn H. Hall Professor in the Graduate School University of California at Berkeley Overview Economics of patents and innovations Changes to US patent
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:01-cv SAS. Parties and Attorneys
US District Court Civil Docket as of 6/28/2007 Retrieved from the court on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:01-cv-10976-SAS
Tiffany D. Gehrke. Associate. Tel
Tiffany D. Gehrke Associate Tel 312.474.6656 tgehrke@marshallip.com Tiffany D. Gehrke secures and protects intellectual property rights for a broad range of clients. In this role, her prior experience
Introduction to Function Blocks Creating Function Blocks Ladder Function Blocks Structured Text Function Blocks Using Omron s Function Block Library
OMRON ELECTRONICS PTY LTD INTRODUCTION TO PLCs (2 DAYS) PLC System Components PLC System Configuration PLC Wiring Memory Matrix and Addressing Ladder Diagrams CX-Programmer Overview Program Development