Results of Proficiency Test AZO dyes in textile February 2017

Transcription

1 Results of Proficiency Test AZO dyes in textile February 2017 Organised by: Author: Correctors: Report: (iis) Spijkenisse, the Netherlands ing. A.S. Noordman de Neef dr. R.G. Visser, ing. R.J. Starink iis17a01 April 2017

2 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SET UP ACCREDITATION PROTOCOL CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SAMPLES ANALYSES RESULTS STATISTICS GRAPHICS Z-SCORES EVALUATION EVALUATION PER SAMPLE AND PER COMPONENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THE GROUP OF LABORATORIES COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS INTERLABORATORY STUDIES DISCUSSION CONCLUSION Appendices: 1. Data and statistical results Summary of other reported results Analytical details List of participants Abbreviations and literature AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 2 of 44

3 1 INTRODUCTION The (iis) organizes a proficiency test (PT) for banned aromatic amines from AZO dyes in textile every year since During the annual proficiency testing program 2016/2017, it was decided to continue the PT for the analyses of banned aromatic amines from AZO dyes in textile. In this interlaboratory study, 170 laboratories in 34 different countries registered for participation (see appendix 4). In this report, the results of the 2017 PT are presented and discussed. This report is also electronically available through the iis website 2 SET UP The (iis) in Spijkenisse, the Netherlands, was the organiser of this proficiency test (PT). Sample analyses for fit-for-use and homogeneity testing were subcontracted to an ISO/IEC accredited laboratory. It was decided to send 2 different textile samples (a cotton sample, labelled #17515 and a polyamide sample, labelled #17516), each dyed with different AZO dyes. Both samples were especially prepared by a third party. The participants were requested to report test results using the indicated units and to report rounded and unrounded test results. The unrounded test results were preferably used for statistical evaluation. 2.1 ACCREDITATION The in Spijkenisse, the Netherlands, is accredited in agreement with ISO/IEC 17043:2010 (R007), since January 2000, by the Dutch Accreditation Council (Raad voor Accreditatie). This PT falls under the accredited scope. This ensures strict adherence to protocols for sample preparation and statistical evaluation and 100% confidentiality of participant s data. Feedback from the participants on the reported data is encouraged and customer s satisfaction is measured on regular basis by sending out questionnaires. 2.2 PROTOCOL The protocol followed in the organisation of this PT was the one as described for proficiency testing in the report iis Interlaboratory Studies: Protocol for the Organisation, Statistics and Evaluation of March 2017 (iis-protocol, version 3.4). This protocol is electronically available through the iis website from the FAQ page. 2.3 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT All data presented in this report must be regarded as confidential and for use by the participating companies only. Disclosure of the information in this report is only allowed by means of the entire report. Use of the contents of this report for third parties is only allowed by written permission of the. Disclosure of the identity of one or more of the participating companies will be done only after receipt of a written agreement of the companies involved. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 3 of 44

4 2.4 SAMPLES Two different bulk textile samples were used in this proficiency test. The first one, a black cotton (sample #17515) was a real live sample (black jeans) and obtained from a participating laboratory. The other one, a rose polyamide textile (sample #17516) was dyed with different AZO-dyes. From the first batch, 194 samples with small pieces of fabric, of approximately 1.6 gram were prepared and labelled # From the second batch, 170 samples with small pieces of fabric, of approximately 3 gram were prepared and labelled # The homogeneity of the subsamples of #17515 was checked by determination of 3,3 -dimethoxybenzidine on eigth stratified randomly selected samples, see table 1 for the test results. 3,3 -dimethoxybenzidine in mg/kg sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # Table 1: homogeneity test results of subsamples #17515 From the above test results, the repeatability was calculated and compared with the corresponding repeatability of the target test method in the next table. Unfortunately, comparison of the repeatability with 0.3 times the reproducibility of the reference test method as in agreement with the procedure of ISO 13528, Annex B2 was not possible as R/r of the reference test method is smaller than 3. 3,3 -dimethoxybenzidine in mg/kg r (observed) 5.0 reference test method EN : * R (ref. test method) 4.2 r (reference test method) 5.1 Table 2: repeatability of subsamples #17515 The homogeneity of the subsamples of #17516 was checked by determination of 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine and 2,4-Xylidine on eigth stratified randomly selected subsamples. See table 3 for the test results. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 4 of 44

5 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine in mg/kg sum of Xylidines in mg/kg *) sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # sample # Table 3: homogeneity test results of subsamples #17516 *) the sum of 2,4-Xylidine and 2,5-Xylidine was determined. Sample #17516 does not contain 2,6-Xylidine, see the discussion in paragraph 5. From the above test results, the repeatabilities were calculated and compared with 0.3 times the corresponding reproducibilities of the reference test method in agreement with the procedure of ISO 13528, Annex B2 in the next table: 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine in mg/kg sum of Xylidines in mg/kg *) r (observed) reference test method EN :2012 EN : * R (ref. test method) Table 4: repeatabilities of subsamples #17516 *) see comment at table 3 above. The calculated repeatabilities of the homogeneity test results were in agreement with the repeatabilities mentioned in (or estimated from) the reference test method. Therefore, homogeneity of the subsamples of #17515 and #17516 was assumed. To the participating laboratories was sent 1 sample labelled #17515 and 1 sample labelled #17516 on February 8, A letter of instructions was added to the sample package. 2.5 ANALYSES The participants were asked to determine the concentrations of 23 forbidden aromatic amines and o-anisidine, applying the analysis procedure that is routinely used in the laboratory. Also some analytical details were requested to be reported. Furthermore, the participants were instructed not to analyse for 4-Aminoazobenzene in sample #17515 as the sample amount was small (1.6 g) and the sample did not contain 4-Aminoazobenzene. In general in iis proficiency tests the sample size is 3 g. Sample #17515 was a real life sample and to be able to serve as many as possible participants the sample size was lowered and an extra instruction was given by that a smaller intake couldbe use because the sample was positive and also that no confirmation replicate had to be performed. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 5 of 44

6 It was explicitly requested to treat the samples as if they were routine samples, but not to perform the extraction step with Chlorobenzene. It was also requested to report the test results using the indicated units on the report form and not to round the test results, but to report as much significant figures as possible. It was also requested not to report less than test results, which are above the detection limit, because such test results cannot be used for meaningful statistical evaluation. To get comparable test results a detailed report form and a letter of instructions are prepared. The detailed report form and the letter of instructions are both made available on the data entry portal The participating laboratories were also requested to confirm the sample receipt on this data entry portal. The letter of instructions can also be downloaded from the iis website 3 RESULTS During five weeks after sample dispatch, the test results of the individual laboratories were gathered via the data entry portal The reported test results are tabulated per sample and per component in the appendix 1 of this report. The laboratories are represented by their code numbers. Directly after the deadline, a reminder was sent to those laboratories that did not report test results at that moment. Shortly after the deadline, the available test results were screened for suspect data. A test result was called suspect in case the Huber Elimination Rule (a robust outlier test) found it to be an outlier. The laboratories that produced these suspect data were asked to check the reported test results (no reanalyses). Additional or corrected test results are used for the data analysis and the original test results are placed under 'Remarks' in the test result tables in appendix 1. Test results that came in after the deadline were not taken into account in this screening for suspect data and thus these participants were not requested for checks. 3.1 STATISTICS The protocol followed in the organisation of this proficiency test was the one as described for proficiency testing in the report iis Interlaboratory Studies: Protocol for the Organisation, Statistics and Evaluation of March 2017 (iis-protocol, version 3.4). For the statistical evaluation the unrounded (when available) figures were used instead of the rounded test results. Test results reported as <... or >... were not used in the statistical evaluation. First, the normality of the distribution of the various data sets per determination was checked by means of the Lilliefors-test, a variant of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and by the calculation of skewness and kurtosis. Evaluation of the three normality indicators in AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 6 of 44

7 combination with the visual evaluation of the graphic Kernel density plot, lead to judgement of the normality being either unknown, OK, suspect or not OK. After removal of outliers, this check was repeated. If a data set does not have a normal distribution, the results of the statistical evaluation should be used with due care. In accordance to ISO 5725 the original test results per determination were submitted subsequently to Dixon s, Grubbs and or Rosner s outlier tests. Outliers are marked by D(0.01) for the Dixon s test, by G(0.01) or DG(0.01) for the Grubbs test and by R(0.01) for the Rosner s test. Stragglers are marked by D(0.05) for the Dixon s test, by G(0.05) or DG(0.05) for the Grubbs test and by R(0.05) for the Rosner s test. Both outliers and stragglers were not included in the calculations of averages and standard deviations. For each assigned value the uncertainty was determined in accordance with ISO Subsequently the calculated uncertainty was evaluated against the respective requirement based on the target reproducibility in accordance with ISO When the uncertainty passed the evaluation no remarks are made in the report. However, when the uncertainty failed the evaluation it is mentioned in the report and it will have significant consequences for the evaluation of the test results. Finally, the reproducibilities were calculated from the standard deviations by multiplying them with a factor of GRAPHICS In order to visualise the data against the reproducibilities from literature, Gauss plots were made, using the sorted data for one determination (see appendix 1). On the Y-axis the reported test results are plotted. The corresponding laboratory numbers are on the X-axis. The straight horizontal line presents the consensus value (a trimmed mean). The four striped lines, parallel to the consensus value line, are the +3s, +2s, -2s and -3s target reproducibility limits of the selected reference test method. Outliers and other data, which were excluded from the calculations, are represented as a cross. Accepted data are represented as a triangle. Furthermore, Kernel Density Graphs were made. The Kernel Density Graph is a method for producing a smooth density approximation to a set of data that avoids some problems associated with histograms. Also a normal Gauss curve was projected over the Kernel Density Graph for reference. 3.3 Z-SCORES To evaluate the performance of the participating laboratories the z-scores were calculated. As it was decided to evaluate the performance of the participants in this proficiency test (PT) against the literature requirements, e.g. ISO reproducibilities, the z-scores were calculated using a target standard deviation. This results in an evaluation independent of the variation in this interlaboratory study. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 7 of 44

8 The target standard deviation was calculated from the literature reproducibility by division with 2.8. In case no literature reproducibility was available, other target values were used, like Horwitz. In some cases, a reproducibility based on former iis proficiency tests could be used. When a laboratory did use a test method with a reproducibility that is significantly different from the reproducibility of the reference test method used in this report, it is strongly advised to recalculate the z-score, while using the reproducibility of the actual test method used. This should be done in order to evaluate whether the reported test results are fit-for-purpose. The z-scores were calculated in accordance with: z (target) = (test result - average of PT) / target standard deviation The z (target) scores are listed in the test result tables in appendix 1. Absolute values for z<2 are very common and absolute values for z>3 are very rare. Therefore the usual interpretation of z-scores is as follows: z < 1 good 1 < z < 2 satisfactory 2 < z < 3 questionable 3 < z unsatisfactory 4 EVALUATION During the execution of this proficiency test some reporting problems occurred. Two participants reported the test results after the deadline and six participants did not report any test results. Finally, 164 participants did report 770 numerical test results. Observed were 18 outlying test results, which is 2.3% of the numerical test results. However, by exception 105 participants (14%!) reported a false positive concentration 2,6-Xylidine to be present in sample #17516 (see the discussion in paragraphs 4.1 and 5). In proficiency studies, outlier percentages of 3% - 7.5% are quite normal. Not all original data sets proved to have a normal Gaussian distribution. These are referred to as not OK or suspect. The statistical evaluation of these data sets should be used with due care, see also paragraph 3.1. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 8 of 44

9 4.1 EVALUATION PER SAMPLE AND PER COMPONENT In this section, the results are discussed per sample and per component. All statistical results reported on the textile samples are summarised in appendix 1 and all other reported test results of the most relevant aromatic amines present are summarised in appendix 2. Textile sample #17515: 3,3 -Dimethoxybenzidine (CASno ): The determination of this aromatic amine at a concentration level of 44 mg/kg was problematic. Three statistical outliers were observed. The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the statistical outliers is not in agreement with the reproducibility requirement estimated from the test method EN :2012. Textile sample #17516: 3,3 -Dimethylbenzidine (CASno ): The determination of this aromatic amine at a concentration level of 44 mg/kg was very problematic. Three statistical outliers were observed and one test result was excluded (see appendix 1). The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the suspect data is not at all in agreement with the reproducibility requirement estimated from the test method EN : ,4-Xylidine (CASno ): The determination of this aromatic amine at a concentration level of 105 mg/kg was problematic. Nine statistical outliers were observed and four test results were excluded (see appendix 1). The calculated reproducibility after rejection of the suspect data is not in agreement with the reproducibility requirement estimated from the test method EN :2012. See for more discussion paragraph 5. 2,6-Xylidine (CASno ): The determination of this aromatic amine was very problematic. It appeared that sample #17516 did not contain 2,6-Xylidine but the isomer 2,5-Xylidine. The 2,5- isomer was falsly interpreted as 2,6- Xylidine by 105! participants. Most likely 18 laboratories were able to separate the isomers correctly and to identify the peaks in the chromatograms to the correct isomers. It is noteworthy that the calculated reproducibility over the test results from those 18 participants is in good agreement with the reproducibility requirement estimated from the test method EN :2012. See also the discussion in paragraph 5. General: The large majority of participating laboratory did not detect any other banned aromatic amines than the four discussed above. Twelve participants reported also the presence of other banned aromatic amines at different concentration levels in sample #17515 (see Appendix 2). Seven participants reported also the presence of other banned aromatic amines at different concentration levels in sample #17516 (see Appendix 2). AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 9 of 44

10 4.2 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THE GROUP OF LABORATORIES A comparison has been made between the reproducibilities as declared by the relevant reference test methods and the reproducibilities as found for the group of participating laboratories. The number of test results, the average results, the calculated reproducibilities (standard deviation*2.8) and the target reproducibilities, derived (or estimated) from the official test method EN are compared in the next two tables. Component unit n average 2.8 * sd R(lit) 3,3 -Dimethoxybenzidine mg/kg Table 5: reproducibilities of the aromatic amines in textile sample #17515 Component unit n average 2.8 * sd R(lit) 3,3 -Dimethylbenzidine mg/kg ,4-Xylidine mg/kg Table 6: reproducibilities of the aromatic amines in textile sample #17516 Without further statistical calculations, it can be concluded that the group of participating laboratories has some difficulties with the analyses at the investigated concentration levels, for the aromatic amines found. See also the discussion in paragraphs 4.1 and COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS INTERLABORATORY STUDIES The variations over the reported test results of 3,3 -Dimethoxybenzidine and 2,4-Xylidine in this proficiency test are in line with the variations as observed in previous PTs and almost in agreement with the target reproducibilities estimated from the reference test method EN :2012, see table 7. The variation over the reported test results of 3,3 - Dimethylbenzidine in this proficiency test is in line with the variations as observed in previous PTs but not at all in agreement with the target reproducibilities estimated from the reference test method EN :2012, see table 7. Parameter Feb. Feb. March April March target PTs 4-Aminodiphenyl n.e. n.e. n.e. (21%)* n.e % 28% Benzidine n.e % 20% 15% n.e % 14% 4-Chloro-o-toluidine n.e. n.e. n.e. 24% n.e. n.e. 16% 2-Naphtylamine n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e % 18% o-aminoazotoluene n.e. n.e. (48%)* n.e. n.e. n.e. 28% 4-Chloroaniline n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. 27% 16% 2,4-Diaminoanisol n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. 52% 24% 16% 4,4 -Diaminodiphenylmethane n.e. n.e. n.e. 21% n.e. 21% 15% 3,3 -Dimethoxybenzidine 17% 16% n.e. 21% 16% 17-31% 13% 3,3 -Dimethylbenzidine 36% n.e. 15% n.e. n.e % 18% 4,4 -Diamino-3,3 - n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e % 16% AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 10 of 44

11 Parameter Feb. Feb. March April March target PTs dichlorodiphenylmethane 4,4 -Diaminodiphenylether n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. 15% 16% 4,4 -Diaminodiphenylsulfide n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e % 16% 4,4 -Methyl-bis(2-chloroaniline) n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. 43% 22% o-toluidine n.e. n.e. (70%)* 31% 27% 19-38% 22% Sum of o-aminoazotoluene and o-toluidine n.e. n.e. 34% n.e. n.e. n.e. 36% 2,4-Xylidine 19% n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. n.e. 16% Table 7: long term development of uncertainties of aromatic amines in textile samples *) Concentration of this component was near or below detection limit or otherwise arbitrary Aromatic amines not mentioned in table 7 are not determined in a PT of iis yet. From the above table it is clear that the quality for the detected banned dyes is quite stable over the last years. 5 DISCUSSION It appeared that for the determination of 2,6-Xylidine in sample #17516 the majority of the participants (105!) could not recognise component 2,5-Xylidine correctly and had false positively identified this peak as 2,6-Xylidine. That sample #17516 did contain 2,5-Xylidine was not known to iis as the sum of 2,4- and 2,5-Xylidine was reported in the homogeneity test (see paragraph 2.4). Participants received a check who did report for 2,6-Xylidine: not detected or lower than. Fortunately, some participants responded very well to this check mail by showing to iis that the sample contained 2,5-Xylidine and not 2,6-Xylidine (see for example next chromatogram of one of these participants, (reported with permission)). This participant explained that if Xylidine is found positively the sample is spiked with 2,5- Xylidine to be able to differentiate component 2,5-Xylidine (which is allowed) from 2,4- Xylidine and 2,6-Xylidine (both not allowed). Corrected test results to replace the not detected or lower than test results were ignored and not detected or lower than were kept in the test results table for 2,6-Xylidine. It appeared that 18 participants reported not AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 11 of 44

12 detected or lower than or had made a remark in the comments for 2,6-Xylidine and reported also a test value for 2,4-Xylidine. When the average over these 18 test results of 2,4-Xylidine is calculated it appeared that this is in line with the whole group. Therefore it is concluded that in general the group was able to identify 2,4-Xylidine correctly. When participants had reported a test value for 2,4-Xylidine and also for 2,6-Xylidine the sum was calculated. Unfortunately, the calculated reproducibility over this sum was not better than the calculated reproducibility for 2,4-Xylidine alone. Some participants mentioned to report the sum of Xylidines or reported identical test results for 2,4-Xylidine and 2,6-Xylidine. These test values were excluded for the statistical analysis as it was not clear whether the reported values were the sum or ½ times the sum. In this PT also some analytical details were asked (see appendix 3) to use for further analyses. It appeared that 92.5% of the participants is accredited for the determination of aromatic amines. As this is the majority of the group no separate statistical analysis has been performed. Another part of the analytical details was about the test conditions after cleavage at 70 C and before the analytical measurements. For example, the temperature during the evaporation of MTBE should not exceed 50 C, otherwise the aromatic amines may deteriorate and may not be detected anymore. Also the time needed between reduction and actual analysis may be important. The time and temperatures used to evaporate the extraction solvent varies over a wide range from only 1 minute upto 90 minutes. The majority of the laboratories (62%) had used temperatures between 40 and 50 C during 1 to 20 minutes. And 24 laboratories (19%) used temperatures from room temperature till 40 C during 3 to 15 minutes. Surprisingly no relation could be found between the conditions used and the concentration of aromatic amines detected, see below graphs in which evaporation temperature in C or evaporation time in minutes is plotted against the reported concentrations in mg/kg. 3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine CAS no # ,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine CAS no # Conc. / (mg/kg) Conc. / (mg/kg) Evap. Temp. / C Evap. Time / min AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 12 of 44

13 ,3'-Dimethylbenzidine CAS no # ,3'-Dimethylbenzidine CAS no #17516 Conc. / (mg/kg) Conc. / (mg/kg) Evap. Temp. / C Evap. Time / min Conc. / (mg/kg) ,4-Xylidine CAS no # Evap. Temp. / C Conc. / (mg/kg) ,4-Xylidine CAS no # Evap. Time / min The total time from the start of the reduction step till start of HPLC/GC analysis varies over a wide range from 1.2 till 72 hours. The majority of the group (68%) completed the whole analysis with in 4 hours. Again no relation could be found between the analysis time needed and the concentration of aromatic amines detected, see below graphs. Conc. / (mg/kg) ,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine CAS no #17515 Conc. / (mg/kg) ,3'-Dimethylbenzidine CAS no # Analysis Time / hours Analysis Time / hours Conc. / (mg/kg) ,4-Xylidine CAS no # Analysis Time / hours AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 13 of 44

14 The tentative conclusion from the above investigation may be that the (in)stability of the investigated aromatic amines 3,3 -dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine and 2,4- Xylidine is not the cause for the observed variation of the test results in this PT. Other factors like for example the calibration may be the cause of the observed variation. 6 CONCLUSION The variation in the test results observed may be caused by the preparation of the sample (reduction to release the aromatic amine and subsequent concentration) and/or by the analytical identification and quantification (incl. calibration). Consequently, the reproducibility may not be improved by only one change in the analysis. Each laboratory has to evaluate its performance in this study and make decisions about necessary corrective actions. Therefore, participation on a regular basis in this scheme could be helpful to improve the performance and thus increase of the quality of the analytical results. AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 14 of 44

15 APPENDIX 1 Determination of 3,3 -Dimethoxybenzidine (CASno ) in sample #17515; results in mg/kg lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 213 EN In house EN C,R(0.05) first reported: In house EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN GB/T EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN ISO EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN ISO EN EN EN EN EN In house EN AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 15 of 44

16 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 2453 EN EN EN EN EN EN n.d possibly a false negative test result? 2482 EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN ISO EN EN C first reported: In house EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN GB/T EN EN EN EN EN R(0.01) EN EN EN EN EN n.d possibly a false negative test result? 2629 EN EN In house EN EN EN EN EN EN In house 79 C,R(0.01) 6.37 first reported: EN EN INH-7334 < 8 <-6.52 possibly a false negative test result? 2730 EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 16 of 44

17 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 3174 EN EN EN C 2.35 first reported: n.d. and test result as 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine 3185 EN EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN normality suspect n 157 outliers 3 mean (n) st.dev. (n) R(calc.) R(EN :12) Compare R(ISO :17)= Kernel Density AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 17 of 44

18 Determination of 3,3 -Dimethylbenzidine (CASno ) in sample #17516; results in mg/kg lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 213 EN EN In house In house EN EN EN EN ex test result excluded as 0 is not a true value 2115 EN EN R(0.01) EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN GB/T EN EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN ISO EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 18 of 44

19 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 2453 EN R(0.05) EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN C 0.27 first reported: EN EN C 0.75 first reported: n.d. and test result as 3,3 -dimethylbenzidine 2506 EN GB/T EN EN In house EN EN GB/T EN R(0.05) EN EN EN EN GB/T EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN INH-7334 < 8 <-4.67 possibly a false negative test result? 2730 EN EN EN EN <5 <-5.06 possibly a false negative test result? 2773 EN EN C first reported: EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 19 of 44

20 lab method value mark z(targ) remarks 3174 EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN EN In house EN EN C first reported: EN EN EN EN EN EN normality OK n 152 outliers 3+1ex mean (n) st.dev. (n) R(calc.) R(EN :12) Compare R(ISO :17)= Kernel Density AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 20 of 44

21 Determination of 2,4-Xylidine (CASno ), 2,6-Xylidine (CASno ) and sum of Xylidines in sample #17516; results in mg/kg lab method 24X mark z(targ) 26X mark z(targ) sum of Xylidines mark z(targ) 213 EN R(0.05) f+? EN In house f+? f+? In house n.d. f-? n.d n.d EN f+? EN f+? n.d EN see remarks EN R(0.01) f+? EN f+? EN f+? R(0.01) f+? EN f+? f+? EN f+? EN EN EN f+? EN EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN < f+? EN EN f+? GB/T C f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? f+? EN In house f+? EN R(0.05) f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN n.d EN EN EN f+? EN ISO f+? f+? EN EN EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN C,R(0.01) f+? EN EN EN < EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN n.d EN n.d EN AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 21 of 44

22 lab method 24X mark z(targ) 26X mark z(targ) sum of Xylidines mark z(targ) 2442 In house EN f+? EN f+? EN ex f+? EN C f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN ex f+? EN R(0.01) f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? C,R(0.01) f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN C, f+? GB/T see remarks EN EN In house EN f+? EN f+? GB/T C f+? EN EN ex EN f+? EN n.d EN < GB/T f+? EN < 3 f-? <-6.01 n.d n.d f+? EN < EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN EN EN f+? In house < EN f+? EN EN f+? EN f+? EN EN f+? In house EN f+? EN < INH-7334 < 8 f-? <-5.71 < EN C C f+? EN < EN f+? EN C,R(0.01) C, f+? EN f+? EN C,R(0.01) C, f+? EN f+? EN EN f+? EN f+? EN EN < EN < EN f+? EN f+? AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 22 of 44

23 lab method 24X mark z(targ) 26X mark z(targ) sum of Xylidines mark z(targ) 3154 EN f+? EN EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN EN n.d EN f+? EN n.d In house f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? EN f+? ex EN C C EN f+? f+? EN EN f+? selected group *) normality OK OK n.a. OK n outliers 9+4ex 0 (105) (f+?) 0 mean (n) n.d. or < st.dev. (n) n.a R(calc.) n.a R(EN :12) **) n.a *) Selected group of test results from labs who had most likely a good separation of the Xylidine isomers and indentified 2,4-Xylidine correctly. **) Based on the average of five reproducibilities mentioned in table B.2 of test method EN :2012 Lab 2261 first reported: for 2,4-Xylidine Lab 2379 first reported for 2,4-Xylidine Lab 2456: test result for 2,4-Xylidine excluded as the same value was reported for 2,6-Xylidine; it was not clear whether the isomers were co-eluted and the reported value was ½ * the sum of the isomers? Lab 2467 first reported: for 2,4-Xylidine Lab 2477: test result for 2,4-Xylidine excluded as the same value was reported for 2,6-Xylidine; it was not clear whether the reported value was ½ * the sum of the isomers? Lab 2497 first reported: for 2,4-Xylidine Lab 2506 first reported: for 2,6-Xylidine Lab 2534 first reported: n.d. for 2,4-Xylidine Lab 2546: test result for 2,4-Xylidine excluded as the sum was reported of 2,4 and 2,6-Xylidine Lab 2730 first reported: n.d. for 2,4- and 2,6-Xylidine Lab 2767 first reported: n.d. for 2,4- and 2,6-Xylidine Lab 2775 first reported: for 2,4- and 0 for 2,6-Xylidine Lab 3222: test result for 2,4-Xylidine excluded as the sum was reported of 2,4 and 2,6-Xylidine Lab 3228 first reported: n.d. for 2,4- and 2,6-Xylidine AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 23 of 44

24 ,4-Xylidine Kernel Density ,6-Xylidine ; most likely 2,5-Xylidine Kernel Density Sum Xylidines Kernel Density AZO dyes in textile: iis17a01 page 24 of 44