Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 2:12-cv JCC Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO."

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ANN TALYANCICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Plaintiff Ann Talyancich, by her attorneys, makes the following allegations and claims for her complaint against Defendant Microsoft Corporation. This class action is brought by Plaintiff individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who have had their Xbox console units excluded from the Xbox LIVE service by Defendant. The following allegations are made upon information and belief, except as to allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiff, which are made upon knowledge. Plaintiff s information and belief is based, inter alia, on the investigation made by and through counsel. PARTIES. Plaintiff Ann Talyancich is a citizen of the State of California.. Defendant Microsoft Corporation is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business in Washington. A global provider of software and other computer products and services, Defendant does business throughout the United States of America. PAGE () -0

2 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of all causes of action asserted herein, pursuant to U.S.C. and under the Class Action Fairness Act.. Venue is proper in this Court because Defendant s headquarters is located in this District, and Defendant conducts substantial business in this District. STATEMENT OF FACTS. Defendant is the manufacturer and distributer of the Xbox 0 console and its predecessor, the Xbox console (collectively referred to herein as Xbox ).. The Xbox is a general purpose computer that is commonly used to access the Internet, play video games, and access and display movies.. Xbox console units currently sell from approximately $. for the Xbox 0 GB Console up to approximately $. for the Xbox 0 Limited Edition Kinect Star Wars Bundle.. To date, in excess of million Xbox console units have been sold since its release in 0.. Included with the purchase of an Xbox console unit is access to the Xbox LIVE service (Internet connection required). 0. Xbox LIVE is an online multiplayer gaming and digital media delivery service.. The Xbox LIVE service is currently available in three variations: Free (formerly known as Silver), Gold, and Family Pack (or Gold Family Pack).. The Xbox LIVE Free service includes the ability to chat and text with friends on Xbox LIVE, industry-leading, built-in Family Settings, the ability to create and customize your Avatar, the ability to download new games and game add-ons, the ability to watch HD movies and TV from Zune, and the ability to preview games with free demos. PAGE () -0

3 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0. In addition to those benefits included with the Xbox LIVE Free service, the Xbox LIVE Gold service includes the ability to play Xbox 0 games online with friends, the ability to instantly watch HD movies from Netflix, the ability to instantly watch last night s TV today with Hulu Plus, the ability to view live sports from ESPN on Xbox LIVE, the ability to use Facebook and Twitter on your TV, and the ability to listen to personalized music from Zune and last.fm.. A one-month membership to Xbox LIVE Gold sells for approximately $., a three-month membership for approximately $., and a twelve-month membership for approximately $... In addition to those benefits included with the Xbox LIVE Gold service, the Xbox LIVE Family Pack service includes four Xbox LIVE Gold memberships for less than the price of two, the ability to manage your family s memberships and settings in the Family Center, the ability to view reports on your family s Xbox LIVE activities, the ability to gift Microsoft Points Allowances to your family, and exclusive discounts on family friendly games.. A twelve month membership to Xbox LIVE Family Pack sells for approximately $... There are currently approximately to million Xbox LIVE members.. Also available for purchase and use with the Xbox LIVE service are Microsoft Points (also known as Xbox LIVE Points and Xbox Points). Microsoft Points are the coin of the Xbox LIVE Marketplace realm and may be purchased directly from the Xbox LIVE Marketplace with a credit card or from brick and mortar retail locations.. 00 Microsoft Points may be purchased for approximately $.; 00 Microsoft Points may be purchased for approximately $.; 00 Microsoft Points may be purchased for approximately $.; 000 Microsoft Points may be purchased for PAGE () -0

4 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 approximately $.; and 000 Microsoft Points may be purchased for approximately $... Microsoft Points are a stored value system that may be used to buy games, add-ons, videos, TV shows, and more in the Xbox LIVE Marketplace.. The Entertainment and Devices Division of Defendant, which includes the Xbox 0 entertainment platform (along with Mediaroom and Windows Phone), had revenue for the twelve months ending June 0,, of $. billion with an operating income of $. billion.. Defendant regularly excludes Xbox console units from the Xbox LIVE service.. Xbox console units display the following message after being excluded from the Xbox LIVE service: This console has been banned for violations of the Terms of Use. To protect the Xbox LIVE service and its members, Microsoft does not provide details about console bans. There is no recourse for Terms of Use violations.. Defendant does not issue refunds or credits for time remaining on Xbox LIVE memberships associated with excluded Xbox console units.. Defendant does not issue refunds or credits for Microsoft Points associated with excluded Xbox console units.. Defendant does not issue refunds or credits for items purchased with Microsoft Points associated with excluded Xbox console units.. Plaintiff Ann Talyancich is the owner of an Xbox console unit ( Talyancich Unit ).. The Talyancich Unit was purchased new.. The Talyancich Unit s DVD drive subsequently failed and Plaintiff Ann Talyancich hired an independent local repairman to repair the unit by installing a new DVD drive. PAGE () -0

5 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0. In approximately April, Plaintiff Ann Talyancich purchased a twelvemonth subscription to Xbox LIVE Gold that included one bonus month.. In approximately May, Defendant installed a software update on the Talyancich Unit.. After installation of the May update, and as a result of the May update, the Talyancich Unit was excluded from and unable to access the Xbox LIVE service.. Defendant has installed software on the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class that has damaged the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class by excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service.. The exclusion of the Talyancich Unit from the Xbox LIVE service by Defendant was in reprisal for the DVD drive repair that was performed by someone other than Defendant.. Since Defendant excluded the Talyancich Unit from the Xbox LIVE service, the Talyancich Unit has been unable to access the Xbox LIVE Free service and the benefits included with that service.. Plaintiff Ann Talyancich had approximately months remaining on her Xbox LIVE Gold subscription when her Xbox console unit was excluded from the Xbox LIVE service.. Since Defendant excluded the Talyancich Unit from the Xbox LIVE service, the Talyancich Unit has been unable to access the Xbox LIVE Gold service and the benefits included with that service.. Defendant issued no refund or credit to Plaintiff Ann Talyancich for the time remaining on her Xbox LIVE Gold subscription.. Plaintiff Ann Talyancich purchased Microsoft Points for use with the Xbox LIVE Marketplace. PAGE () -0

6 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0. Since Defendant excluded the Talyancich Unit from the Xbox LIVE service, the Talyancich Unit has been unable to access and use the Microsoft Points Plaintiff Ann Talyancich purchased for use with the Xbox LIVE Marketplace.. Since Defendant excluded the Talyancich Unit from the Xbox LIVE service, the Talyancich Unit has been unable to access and use the items purchased by Plaintiff Ann Talyancich from the Xbox LIVE Marketplace with Microsoft Points.. Defendant issued no refund or credit to Plaintiff Ann Talyancich for the remaining unused Microsoft Points she purchased for use with the Talyancich Unit in the Xbox LIVE Marketplace.. Defendant issued no refund or credit to Plaintiff Ann Talyancich for the items she purchased from the Xbox LIVE Marketplace for use with the Talyancich Unit. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiff brings this action as a nationwide class on behalf of herself and a Class (the Class ) defined as follows: all persons in the United States of America and its Territories whose Xbox consoles have been excluded from the Xbox LIVE service.. Numerosity. Defendant has unlawfully excluded hundreds of thousands of Xbox console units from the Xbox LIVE service. As such, the Class consists of hundreds of thousands of individuals and other entities, making joinder impractical. In addition, the disposition of the Class members claims in a single action will provide substantial benefits to the parties and the Court.. Commonality. Defendant has acted and failed to act on grounds generally applicable to the Plaintiff and the other members of the Class by unlawfully excluding hundreds of thousands of Xbox console units from the Xbox LIVE service, requiring the Court s imposition of uniform relief to ensure compatible standards of conduct toward the members of the Class. PAGE () -0

7 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of. There are many questions of law and fact common to the claims of Plaintiff and the other members of the Class, and those questions predominate over any questions that may affect individual members of the Class. Common questions for the Class include, but are not limited to, the following: 0 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Has Defendant breached contracts with the Class members? Has Defendant been unjustly enriched at the expense of the Class members? Is Defendant subject to liability in restitution? Has Defendant intentionally and without justification interfered with the personal property of Plaintiff and members of the Class, thereby depriving Plaintiff and members of the Class of the possession and use of their personal property? Are the Class members entitled to treble damages based on the willfulness of Defendant s conduct? Are the Class members entitled to injunctive relief?. Typicality. The factual and legal bases of Defendant s liability to Plaintiff and to the other members of the Class are the same, resulting in injury to the Plaintiff and to all of the other members of the Class as a result of Defendant s conduct of unlawfully excluding hundreds of thousands of Xbox console units from the Xbox LIVE service. Plaintiff and the other Class members have all suffered harm and damages as a result of Defendant s unlawful and wrongful conduct as a result of unlawfully excluding hundreds of thousands of Xbox console units from the Xbox LIVE service.. Adequacy of Representation. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the other members of the Class. Plaintiff has retained counsel with substantial experience in prosecuting complex litigation and class actions. Plaintiff and her counsel are committed to vigorously prosecuting this action on behalf of the members of the PAGE () -0

8 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Class, and have the financial resources to do so. Neither Plaintiff nor her counsel has any interest adverse to those of the other members of the Class. 0. Absent a class action, most members of the Class would find the cost of litigating their claims to be prohibitive, and will have no effective remedy. Class treatment of common questions of law and fact is also superior to multiple individual actions or piecemeal litigation in that it conserves the resources of the courts and the litigants, and promotes consistency and efficiency of adjudication. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract Xbox Console Units. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased their Xbox console units from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors, as the case may be).. Included with the sale of each Xbox console unit to Plaintiff and members of the Class was access to and use of the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith).. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) thereby breaching the Xbox console unit sale contracts between Defendant and Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Plaintiff and members of the Class have been damaged by Defendant s breach. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract Paid Xbox LIVE. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased access to and use of the Paid Xbox LIVE service (Xbox LIVE Gold service and/or Xbox LIVE Family Pack service) from PAGE () -0

9 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Defendant (or Defendant s distributors, as the case may be) for use with their Xbox console units.. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Paid Xbox LIVE service, thereby preventing Plaintiff and the Class members from accessing and using the purchased Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) with their Xbox console units and thereby breaching the Paid Xbox LIVE service sale contracts between Defendant and Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Plaintiff and members of the Class have been damaged by Defendant s breach. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract Microsoft Points 0. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through 0 as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased Microsoft Points from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors, as the case may be) for use with their Xbox console units.. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service, thereby preventing Plaintiff and the Class members from using the purchased Microsoft Points with their Xbox console units and thereby breaching the Microsoft Points sale contracts between Defendant and Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Plaintiff and members of the Class have been damaged by Defendant s breach. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Unjust Enrichment, Restitution and/or Money Had and Received Xbox Console Units. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased their Xbox console units from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors, as the case may be). PAGE () -0

10 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page 0 of 0. Included with the sale of each Xbox console unit to Plaintiff and members of the Class was access to and use of the Free Xbox LIVE service and the benefits included with that service.. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Free Xbox LIVE service and the benefits included with that service.. As a result of Defendant s actions, Plaintiff and members of the Class have been unable to access and use the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) purchased with each Xbox console unit.. Defendant received money from Plaintiff and members of the Class in exchange for access to and use of the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) with each Xbox console unit and retained this money after excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Free Xbox LIVE service. 0. Plaintiff and members of the Class have conferred a benefit to Defendant via the purchase of their Xbox console units from Defendant.. The benefit conferred to Defendant was at the expense of Plaintiff and members of the Class and Defendant has an appreciation or knowledge of the conferred benefit.. Because Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) it is unjust for Defendant to retain the benefit conferred to it by Plaintiff and members of the Class without payment or restitution from Defendant to Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Defendant has been unjustly enriched by excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) and Plaintiff and members of the Class are entitled to restitution. PAGE 0 () -0

11 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION Unjust Enrichment, Restitution and/or Money Had and Received Paid Xbox LIVE. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased their Xbox console units from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors, as the case may be).. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased access to and use of the Paid Xbox LIVE service (Xbox LIVE Gold service and/or Xbox LIVE Family Pack service) from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors as the case may be) for use with their Xbox console units.. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Paid Xbox LIVE service and the benefits included with that service.. As a result of Defendant s actions, Plaintiff and members of the Class have been unable to access and use the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) that they purchased.. Defendant received money from Plaintiff and members of the Class in exchange for access to and use of the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) and retained this money after excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Paid Xbox LIVE service. 0. Plaintiff and members of the Class have conferred a benefit to Defendant via the purchase of their Paid Xbox LIVE service from Defendant.. The benefit conferred to Defendant was at the expense of Plaintiff and members of the Class and Defendant has an appreciation or knowledge of the conferred benefit.. Because Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) it is PAGE () -0

12 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 unjust for Defendant to retain the benefit conferred to it by Plaintiff and members of the Class without payment or restitution from Defendant to Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Defendant has been unjustly enriched by excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith) and Plaintiff and members of the Class are entitled to restitution. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION Unjust Enrichment, Restitution and/or Money Had and Received Microsoft Points. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased their Xbox console units from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors as the case may be).. Plaintiff and members of the Class purchased Microsoft Points from Defendant (or Defendant s distributors as the case may be) for use with their Xbox console units.. Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service, thereby preventing Plaintiff and the Class members from using the purchased Microsoft Points with their Xbox console units.. As a result of Defendant s actions, Plaintiff and members of the Class have been unable to access and use their Microsoft Points.. Defendant received money from Plaintiff and members of the Class in exchange for the Microsoft Points and retained this money after excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service. 0. Plaintiff and members of the Class have conferred a benefit to Defendant via the purchase of their Microsoft Points from Defendant.. The benefit conferred to Defendant was at the expense of Plaintiff and members of the Class and Defendant has an appreciation or knowledge of the conferred benefit. PAGE () -0

13 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Because Defendant excluded the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service, thereby preventing Plaintiff and the Class members from using the purchased Microsoft Points with their Xbox console units, it is unjust for Defendant to retain the benefit conferred on it by Plaintiff and members of the Class without payment or restitution from Defendant to Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Defendant has been unjustly enriched by excluding the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from the Xbox LIVE service, thereby preventing Plaintiff and the Class members from using the purchased Microsoft Points with their Xbox console units and Plaintiff and members of the Class are entitled to restitution. SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION Trespass to Chattels. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations contained in paragraphs through as if fully set forth herein.. The Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class are the personal property of Plaintiff and members of the Class.. Defendant intentionally and without justification interfered with the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class by installing software on the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class resulting in the exclusion of the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from accessing and using the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith), from accessing and using the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith), and from accessing and using Microsoft Points, thereby depriving Plaintiff and members of the Class of the possession and use of their Xbox console units.. Defendant intentionally and without justification excluded Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class from accessing and using the Free Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith), from accessing and using the Paid Xbox LIVE service (and the benefits included therewith), and from accessing and using Microsoft Points, thereby PAGE () -0

14 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 depriving Plaintiff and members of the Class of the possession and use of their Xbox console units.. Defendant intentionally and without justification interfered with the Xbox console units of Plaintiff and members of the Class thereby depriving Plaintiff and members of the Class of the possession and use of their Xbox console units.. Plaintiff and members of the Class have been damaged by the actions of Defendant. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Ann Talyancich, on behalf of herself and the Class, prays for the following relief: A. An order certifying this case as a class action on behalf of the Class defined above, appointing Ann Talyancich as class representative, and appointing her counsel as class counsel; B. An award of actual damages; C. An award of restitution; D. An award of punitive damages where appropriate; E. An injunction requiring Defendant to cease excluding Xbox console units from accessing the Xbox LIVE service; F. An award of reasonable attorneys fees and costs; G. An award of pre- and post-judgment interest, to the extent allowable; and H. Such further and other relief the Court deems equitable and just. //// //// //// //// //// PAGE () -0

15 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JURY DEMAND Plaintiff requests trial by jury of all claims, pursuant to LR (b). DATED this th day of June,. SKELLENGER BENDER, P.S. s/ Jeffrey C. Grant Jeffrey C. Grant, WSBA No. 0 jgrant@skellengerbender.com Attorneys for Ann Talyancich and the Putative Class William B. Federman Oklahoma Bar No. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 0 N. Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (0) -0 (telephone) (0) - (facsimile) wbf@federmanlaw.com Cornelius P. Dukelow Oklahoma Bar No. 0 ABINGTON COLE South Boston Avenue, Suite 0 Tulsa, Oklahoma (telephone & facsimile) cdukelow@abingtonlaw.com PAGE () -0

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT

IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT Vanderburgh Circuit Court Filed: 7/25/2018 12:38 PM Clerk Vanderburgh County, Indiana STATE OF INDIANA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH ) IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT EVANSVILLE WATER AND SEWER UTILITY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International, Case :-cv-0-fjm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 GRAIF BARRETT & MATURA, P.C. Kevin C. Barrett, State Bar No. 00 Jeffrey C. Matura, State Bar No. 0 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) AMAZON.COM, INC., a/k/a ) AMAZON.COM AUCTIONS, INC. ) ) Defend ant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff, Case 107-cv-00451-SSB Doc # 1 Filed 06/08/07 Page 1 of 15 PAGEID # 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., 9220

More information

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:07-cv-00650-D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1) RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Plaintiff, v. Case No.

More information

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13 Case 4:14-cv-00368-BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COOLING & APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC. PLAINTIFF V.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT 8/31/2015 4:34:54 PM 15CV23200 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Capacity Commercial Group, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, vs.

More information

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8

Case5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8 Case:-cv-0-HRL Document Filed0// Page of John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 00) jedmonds@cepiplaw.com COLLINS, EDMONDS, POGORZELSKI, SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC East First Street, Suite 00 Santa Ana, California

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Reed et al v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REED, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. FREEBIRD FILM PRODUCTIONS,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant.

More information

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:06-cv-01142-RWR Document t Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Joanne Augst-Johnson, Nancy Reeves, Debra Shaw, Jan Tyler,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT

More information

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION

CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AMENDED CLASS-ACTION PETITION CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI TODD JANSON, GERALD T. ARDREY, ) CHAD M. FERRELL, and C & J ) REMODELING LLC, on behalf of ) themselves and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION AZURE NETWORKS, LLC and TRI-COUNTY EXCELSIOR FOUNDATION, v. Plaintiffs, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR,

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:18-cv-08182 Document 1 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 14 Gregory Bockin (pending pro hac vice) Samantha Williams (pending pro hac vice) Jacqueline O Reilly (pending pro hac vice) S. Yael Berger (pending

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CROSSPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant.

More information

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 Case 4:16-cv-00746 Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Neal Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Bullet Proof Diesel

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL ) HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. ) RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD. and )

More information

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:16-cv-01240-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RIOT GAMES, INC.,, Defendant.

More information

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v.

More information

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7 Victor J. Kisch, OSB No. 941038 vjkisch@stoel.com Todd A. Hanchett, OSB No. 992787 tahanchett@stoel.com John B. Dudrey, OSB No. 083085 jbdudrey@stoel.com

More information

Case 2:15-cv JLR Document 8 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:15-cv JLR Document 8 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 21 Case :-cv-0-jlr Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 KATHERINE MOUSSOURIS, HOLLY MUENCHOW, and DANA PIERMARINI, on behalf of themselves and a class of

More information

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9 Case 111-cv-07566-JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9 Gary P. Naftalis Michael S. Oberman KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 715-9100

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., Plaintiff, v. DEXCOM, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Abbott Diabetes Care

More information

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 Case 1:16-cv-00308-JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER 1718 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Suite 200 Washington, DC 20009 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. THE UNITED STATES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAKESOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 v. Demand for Jury Trial WAL-MART STORES, INC. and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ZAVALA LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.

More information

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. ) claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Twin Dolphin Dr., th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 0 Phone: (0) 0-000

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0, PC MICHAEL D. ROTH, State Bar No. roth@caldwell-leslie.com South Figueroa Street, st Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: ()

More information

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE Case 1:18-cv-01604-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DELAWARE MAGNACHARGE LLC v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., and

More information

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. Case 1:16-cv-00212-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JSDQ MESH TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, Case No.: v. JURY TRIAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NEUROGRAFIX; NEUROGRAPHY INSTITUTE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; IMAGE-BASED SURGICENTER CORPORATION; and AARON G. FILLER, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit Z 0 0 Tyler J. Woods, Bar No. twoods@trialnewport.com NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP 00 Newport Place, Suite 00 Newport Beach, CA 0 Tel: () 0- Fax: () 0- Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant SHIPPING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., a Delaware corporation;

More information

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:11-cv KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:11-cv-02684-KHV-DJW Document 1 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) COMCAST

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JERAN BINNING, Derivatively on Behalf of THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., v. Plaintiff, ADEBAYO O. OGUNLESI, DAVID A. VINIAR, JAMES A. JOHNSON, WILLIAM W.

More information

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES SCANNED ON 31912010 9 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK... X KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN, LLP, -against- Plaintiff, DUANE READE AND DUANE READE INC., Defendants. IAS Part

More information

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770

Case 3:10-cv D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770 Case 3:10-cv-02506-D Document 119 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1770 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CONCEAL CITY, L.L.C., vs. Plaintiff, LOOPER

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC d/b/a Mall of America for its Verified Complaint STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Mall of America, v. Plaintiff, Black Lives Matter Minneapolis, Miski Noor, Michael McDowell, Lena Gardner, Kandace Montgomery, John

More information

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of ROBERT E. BELSHAW (SBN ) 0 Vicente Street San Francisco, California Telephone: () -0 Attorney for Plaintiff American Small Business League UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:16-cv HRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-0-hrl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 0 DAN SIEGEL, SBN 00 SONYA Z. MEHTA, SBN SIEGEL & YEE th Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0-00 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys for Plaintiff MICAELA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CARUCEL INVESTMENTS, L.P., vs. Plaintiff, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., d/b/a AUDI OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant.

More information

Standard-Essential Patents

Standard-Essential Patents Standard-Essential Patents Richard Gilbert University of California, Berkeley Symposium on Management of Intellectual Property in Standard-Setting Processes October 3-4, 2012 Washington, D.C. The Smartphone

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:15-cv-00765 Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-765 EDWARD K. QUICK, v. Plaintiff, FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., AND MICHELE ZEIER, AN INDIVIDUAL, Defendants.

More information

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5 Case:-cv-00-LHK Document Filed0/0/ Page of Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 0) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. ) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. ) Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 0) Anne B. Shaver (State

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company. PlainSite Legal Document Ohio Northern District Court Case No. 5:12-cv-03052 Sherwin-Williams Company v. Wooster Brush Company Document 1 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NEUROGRAFIX, a California corporation; NEUROGRAPHY INSTITUTE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAMELA JOHNSTON, Plaintiff, -against- ELECTRUM PARTNERS, LLC and LESLIE BOCSKOR, Civil Action No.: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. PAMELA JOHNSTON

More information

CASE 0:18-cv PAM-HB Document 1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:18-cv PAM-HB Document 1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:18-cv-01691-PAM-HB Document 1 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MegaForce, a South Korea corporation, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 18-cv-01691

More information

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM

Filing # E-Filed 02/17/ :19:19 PM Filing # 23876540 E-Filed 02/17/2015 06:19:19 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BURTON W. WIAND, as Receiver for TRI-MED CORPORATION

More information

Case 2:11-cv JVS -MLG Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 30 Page ID #:9

Case 2:11-cv JVS -MLG Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 30 Page ID #:9 Case :-cv-0-jvs -MLG Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: Case :-cv-0-jvs -MLG Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: Plaintiff Nathaniel Schwartz ( Plaintiff ), acting on behalf of himself and all

More information

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018 KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018 KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION Your submission of this Online Sales Application does not constitute

More information

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~

~ft~... J _J ~ ' ;1 '::1st~ ::i<isi~1 110.J tn Dis~~d;e ~ Case 4:15-cv-00303-SWW Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INNOVIS LABS, INC. v. Plaintiff, Civil No. '/,'/ JtL y..3c_s- 5.J~ BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT,

More information

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12 Case 2:08-cv-00294-DF-CE Document 1 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LEON STAMBLER, v. Plaintiff, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.;

More information

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH

MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH This LICENSE TO PUBLISH (this License ), dated as of: DATE (the Effective Date ), is executed by the corresponding author listed on Schedule A (the Author ) to grant a license

More information

Agnieszka Wormus 1409 Glen Eagle Ct Fort Collins, CO USA (+1)

Agnieszka Wormus 1409 Glen Eagle Ct Fort Collins, CO USA (+1) Contract: Date of the Event: Coverage Time: The contract can be downloaded here: www.abrilliantphoto.com/abrilliantphoto_contract.pdf Please fill out as much as you know, and mail me the ENTIRE contract.

More information

WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT

WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT ( Company ) has read the Writers Guild of America ( WGA ) Low Budget Agreement (the Low Budget Agreement ). Company desires to produce (the Picture ) under the Low Budget Agreement.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, [Title] Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, [Title] Defendant. Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of 0 C.K. Lee, to be admitted pro hac vice LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC 0 East th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 0 Tel.: -- Fax: -- Email: cklee@leelitigation.com David

More information

Case 2:18-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:18-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:18-cv-01418-NBF Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (PITTSBURGH DIVISION) BATTLE BORN MUNITIONS INC. ) 171 Coney Island Drive

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2013 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2013 INDEX NO. 160167/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 11/04/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:11-cv-01165-BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5 David K. Broadbent (0442) Cory A. Talbot (11477) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801)

More information

Case 1:12-cv WYD Document 1 Filed 02/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv WYD Document 1 Filed 02/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:12-cv-00411-WYD Document 1 Filed 02/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LANDIS EDWARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

More information

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:14-cv AJB-JMA Document 1 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 16 Case :-cv-0-ajb-jma Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 CALLIE A. BJURSTROM (STATE BAR NO. PETER K. HAHN (STATE BAR NO. MICHELLE A. HERRERA (STATE BAR NO. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 0 West Broadway,

More information

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case 1:18-cv-08050-AKH Document 1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., -against- Plaintiff MODERN WELLNESS, INC.; CAROL

More information

Case 8:17-cv EAK-AEP Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 38 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-AEP Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 38 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:17-cv-02433-EAK-AEP Document 1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 38 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ANGELA HARWOOD BRENT, individually, and on behalf of all

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. :

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 : : Defendants. : Case 1:17-cv-06195 Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- X REBECCA ALLEN, : : Plaintiff,

More information

4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation proceeding

4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation proceeding 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Jeffrey A. Goldberg and Andrew Federhar are attorneys who represented the Kingman Airport Authority with respect to the condemnation

More information

Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:18-cv-00697-LPS-CJB Document 5 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 3SHAPE A/S, Plaintiff, v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

More information

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:12-cv CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:12-cv-02196-CCC Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HASU P. SHAH v. Plaintiff, HARRISTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:14-cv-06865 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 PBN PHARMA, LLC, AHNAL PUROHIT, and HARRY C. BOGHIGIAN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

More information

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case -cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of POMERANTZ LLP Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone () - Email jpafiti@pomlaw.com - additional counsel on signature page - UNITED

More information

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of 0 Gail L. Chung (CA State Bar No. ) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -00 Jack A. Raisner René S. Roupinian Robert

More information

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/26/16 Page: 1 of 29 PAGEID #: 62

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/26/16 Page: 1 of 29 PAGEID #: 62 Case: 1:15-cv-00748-SJD Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/26/16 Page: 1 of 29 PAGEID #: 62 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division Vicki Linneman, et al., On behalf of

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 17 Case 1:18-cv-03670 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HENRIETTA FTIKAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:17-cv-02547-KMT Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. CAROLYN AMMIDOWN, Plaintiff, v. NOBEL LEARNING

More information

Textron/Harman Fair Fund c/o Analytics Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2011 Chanhassen, MN PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

Textron/Harman Fair Fund c/o Analytics Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2011 Chanhassen, MN PROOF OF CLAIM FORM United States District Court, Southern District of New York, SEC v. Al-Raya Investment Company, et al. Textron/Harman Fair Fund c/o Analytics Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2011 Chanhassen, MN 55317-2011 PROOF

More information

Lawyers sued over advice to board

Lawyers sued over advice to board Lawyers sued over advice to board Misrepresentation, negligence Publicly held company Number of employees Over 1,000 Approximately $2 billion A large public company misstated its revenue during three quarters

More information

SAMPLE. This document is presented for guidance only and does not completely state either Oklahoma law or OCC regulations.

SAMPLE. This document is presented for guidance only and does not completely state either Oklahoma law or OCC regulations. BEFORE THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION In the Matter of the Application of [Company ) Name] for a Certificate of Convenience ) and Necessity To Provide Local Exchange ) Services Within the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. E4X, Inc.; Fiftyone, Inc.; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Case 2:10-cv-00139-TJW Document 1 Filed 04/23/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Plaintiff, CAUSE NO. 2:10-139

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan. Petitioner INDEX No against-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan. Petitioner INDEX No against- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE Sam Sloan -against- Petitioner INDEX No. 2004-7739 Beatriz Marinello, Tim Hanke, Stephen Shutt, Elizabeth Shaughnessy, Randy Bauer, Bill Goichberg,

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6 Case 4:17-cv-00412 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JACOB BROWN, JOSE CORA, and ROLANDO MARTINEZ,

More information

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-00124 Document 1 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WI-LAN INC., v. Plaintiff, ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,

More information

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

Rocco E. Testani, Partner , Partner 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30309-3996 Office: 404.853.8390 rocco.testani@sutherland.com Rocco Testani represents clients in litigation ranging from complex business disputes

More information

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies TERMS AND CONDITIONS for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies Introduction The IMDS Advanced Interface Service (hereinafter also referred to as the IMDS-AI ) was developed

More information

Attorneys for Applicant Insurance Commissioner of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Attorneys for Applicant Insurance Commissioner of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES G:\!GRP\!CASES\-0-0\Pleadings\Art Apps\Murals\Finals\Murals Sale Notice.doc West Fifth Street Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 0 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California FELIX LEATHERWOOD W. DEAN FREEMAN

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/13/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/14/2019

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/13/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/14/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF New York CHRISTOPHER FEHN Index No. Plaintiff(s), -against- Slipknot, Incorporated; Slipknot, Incorporated; Knot Merch - LLC; SK Productions, LLC; SK Touring,

More information

(A Sample Letter of Agreement for manuscript preparation) (Sample) Letter of Agreement

(A Sample Letter of Agreement for manuscript preparation) (Sample) Letter of Agreement lifewriters.ca Toll-free: 800.864.9152 Assisted memoirs, family stories, and corporate histories Email: info@lifewriters.ca (A Sample Letter of Agreement for manuscript preparation) Mr. John Doe 850 Eighth

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 04:38 PM INDEX NO. 157522/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------)(

More information

Guidelines to Consign in Artist s Den Gallery

Guidelines to Consign in Artist s Den Gallery Guidelines to Consign in Artist s Den Gallery 1. The Mayflower Arts Center is a family friendly gallery and studio. Any/all artists and artworks are subject to Mayflower Arts Center s owner selection and

More information

Martin S. Himeles, Jr.

Martin S. Himeles, Jr. Martin S. Himeles, Jr. Partner Martin S. Himeles Jr., managing partner of Zuckerman Spaeder s Baltimore office, has more than 35 years of experience addressing complex legal problems through rigorous analysis,

More information

Case 2:14-cv JCJ Document 45 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv JCJ Document 45 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:14-cv-06660-JCJ Document 45 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SATNAM DISTRIBUTORS LLC, D/B/A LION & BEAR DISTRIBUTORS, 553 Winchester

More information

DOWNLOAD OR READ : XBOX LIVE GOLD QUESTIONS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

DOWNLOAD OR READ : XBOX LIVE GOLD QUESTIONS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI DOWNLOAD OR READ : XBOX LIVE GOLD QUESTIONS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI Page 1 Page 2 xbox live gold questions xbox live gold questions pdf xbox live gold questions Xbox Live 12-Month Gold Membership Digital Download

More information

Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:17-cv-00952-RGA Document 8 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 90 PageID #: 546 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HERA WIRELESS S.A. and SISVEL UK LIMITED, v. ROKU, INC., Plaintiffs,

More information

WGA DOCUMENTARY SCREENPLAY CONTRACT

WGA DOCUMENTARY SCREENPLAY CONTRACT WGA DOCUMENTARY SCREENPLAY CONTRACT ( Company ) has read the Writers Guild of America ( WGA ) Documentary Screenplay Contract (the Documentary Screenplay Contract ). Company desires to produce (the Picture

More information

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 18 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 STEFANI E. SHANBERG (State Bar No. ) JOHN P. FLYNN (State Bar No. 0) JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT (State Bar No. ) EUGENE MARDER (State Bar No. ) MADELEINE E. GREENE (State

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MONIQUE DA SILVA MOORE, on ) behalf of herself and all others similarly ) situated, ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) PLAINTIFF, ) Civ No. ) v. ) JURY

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2012 INDEX NO. 653189/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY MAFG ART FUND, LLC, and MACANDREWS & FORBES

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:16-cv-00007 Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 Case 6:15-cv-00584-RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BLUE SPIKE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information