A Novel Continuous-Time Common-Mode Feedback for Low-Voltage Switched-OPAMP

Transcription

1 10.4 A Novel Continuous-Time Common-Mode Feedback for Low-oltage Switched-OPAMP M. Ali-Bakhshian Electrical Engineering Dept. Sharif University of Tech. Azadi Ave., Tehran, IRAN alibakhshian@ee.sharif.edu K. Sadeghi Electrical Engineering Dept. Sharif University of Tech. Azadi Ave., Tehran, IRAN ksadeghi@sharif.edu ABSTRACT A novel rail-to-rail and fast continuous-time common-mode feedback (CMFB) strategy is presented proper for low-voltage Switched-OPAMP (SO) circuits. The threshold voltage change due to bulk signal is used to measure the output voltage. To satisfy speed requirements, averaging common-mode (CM) level and amplifying error signal are realized in a single block. Finally, the measured CM level is controlled by applying an error-voltage dependent current to the output nodes. As a design example, a modified low-voltage switched-opamp in a cascade 2-1 delta-sigma modulator adopting the proposed technique is presented. SPICE simulation using a 0.18µm technology and DD=0.9 is provided which confirms the expected accuracy and speed of the CMFB circuitry. Categories and Subject Descriptors B.7.1 [Integrated Circuits]: Types and Design Styles algorithms implemented in hardware. critical in low-voltage applications. To measure the settling time it can be considered that for CM voltage error lower than small percentage of the desired value, change in small signal model can be tolerated [4]. Figure 1. A modern SC CMFB presented in [5] General Terms Design, erification. Keywords CMFB, Continuous-Time, Switched-OPAMP, Low-oltage, Delta-Sigma 1. INTRODUCTION Switched-OPAMP (SO) is a well-known solution for implementation of switched-capacitor (SC) circuits as supply voltage decreases below 1.5 [2]. However, to deal with lowvoltage and high-speed SO circuits, it is necessary to develop new CMFB strategies. As the amplifier output in OFF phase is connected to positive or negative power supply, the CMFB must be fast enough to settle the output CM level to the desired value in a short while after switching ON the amplifier. Also, the CMFB circuitry should not limit the output swing which is very Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. ISLPED 04, August 9 11, 2004, Newport Beach, California, USA. Copyright 2004 ACM /04/0008 $5.00. Figure 2. (a) Output stage of a typical OPAMP (b) Blockdiagram presentation of the proposed CMFB Switched-Capacitor strategies result in lower power consumption and a higher voltage gain so that they have been the best candidates for CMFB implementation in many circuits reported. Traditional SC CMFB networks introduce charge error as consequence of clock feed-through and charge injection which both arises due to the connection of the amplifier output nodes with a MOS switch. Also, some instances presented for lowvoltage implementation will lead to large output capacitor because of the feedback factor imposed. Although some modern SC CMFB networks, like the one shown in Figure 1, avoid these problems [5], they face some other constraints for fast OPAMP switching. 296

2 As shown in the figure, the reset of the sampling capacitors (C 1 and C 2) to DD in OFF phase increases the charge in output nodes to be discharged. The initial condition of Zero for their voltages needs some additional switches to disconnect the capacitors from output or it results in signal-dependent charge loss of integrating capacitors. The CMFB output shown in the figure is used to control some internal current sources as a mean to control the output CM level. The loop created between output and internal nodes can introduce some additional poles and zeros which in turn can change the transfer function. On the other hand, the biasing constraints can limit the additional current imposed to the circuit to discharge the output. Finally, if this CMFB circuit is used with OPAMP topology shown in Figure 7, a class AB OTA proper for low-voltage implementation, it needs some additional transistors to compare the measured CM voltage with reference, amplify the error signal and to apply CMFB output current to nodes n 1 and n 2 [2]. This additional block and above mentioned reasons can influence the time needed to set the output CM level. In this paper, a new non-linear continuous-time CMFB is presented. Without manipulation of internal nodes, the output and input of the CMFB are connected to the output of the amplifier. Output voltage is sensed due to the variation of the threshold voltage according to bulk signal. Averaging the output sensed voltages to calculate the CM value, comparison to reference voltage and amplifying the error signal is done in a single block called average-error amplifier. To control the output CM level, proper amount of current proportional to the amplified error signal is applied to the OPAMP output nodes. The nonlinear behavior of the G m module satisfies speed requirement expected. 2. THE PROPOSED STRATEGY The output node in most OPAMPs is the cross junction of two sink and source current sources. Considering channel length modulation in Figure 2-a, any change in I Ma due to IN results in variation of output node voltage, out, such that I Ma=I Mb is maintained. Furthermore, in equilibrium condition and with a fixed voltage at output node, the injection of any positive (negative) current to output node, increases (decreases) out. Taking advantage of this well-known fact, the new CMFB strategy can be developed as following: limitation results in speed degradation. However, the bulk pin can tolerate a full scale signal without changing the activity region of the MOS. Monitoring the T fluctuation of a transistor due to bulk signal can be used to measure the main OPAMP output voltage. For the scheme shown in Figure 3-a and assuming a constant bias current, if the bulk voltage is varied due to IN, will be affected as T changes. Thus a one to one correspondence can be made between and IN. On the other hand, connecting bulk pin to a full-range signal can forward bias bulk-source junction and increase the bulk current. Increase in bulk current can decrease the overall gain by loading the output impedance. To overcome this problem, the scheme shown in Figure 2-b can be used. SPICE simulation is done for both PMOS and NMOS devices to find the best choice and the best range of value for DBB. Applying a full range signal to the bulk pin and performing Fourier analysis, Figure 4 shows the total harmonic distortion (THD) of the output signal as a function of DBB. For the same aspect ratio, it can be seen that the minimum level of THD for PMOS devices is as high as the highest level in NMOS case. Furthermore, the DC component of the output signal for PMOS is negative (-0.3 for DBB= 0.2), that with DD=0.9 it s out of the range that can be handled. Although for NMOS transistors around DBB=0.55 the minimum THD can be achieved, as the simulation shows, the voltage across current source is about -0.2 which is impossible for CMOS implementation. Trading off between THD and voltage headroom across biasing current source, it can be concluded that DBB in the range of with NMOS type is the best choice. Figure 3. (a) Using a NMOS as a voltage sensor (b) Modified scheme for both PMOS and NMOS A. Output voltages are measured and averaged to calculate the CM level. B. The measured CM voltage is compared to a reference voltage level and the error signal is amplified using an amplifier. C. Using a G m module, a current proportional to the error signal is injected into the output nodes. Figure 2-b shows the block diagram representation of the circuit. In the following sections, the details of low-voltage CMOS implementation of the blocks are presented. 2.1 Output oltage Measurement There are some constraints to apply a full range voltage to the gates of input transistors in a typical continuous-time CMFB. The applied voltage should support enough large GS to keep the transistors in ON state and any additional circuit to avoid this Figure 4. THD of output signal in term of DBB 297

3 2.2 Generation of the Amplified Error Signal For faster response, averaging of the output signals to calculate the CM level, comparison with reference voltage, and amplification of the error signal should be done in a single block called average-error amplifier. The implemented low-voltage error amplifier is shown in Figure 5-a [2]. The main drawback of this architecture is the need for an additional block to specify the CM level. Using additional blocks can result in more complicated design process as well as slowing the CMFB and degrading stability. The implemented solution is shown in Figure 5-b. The following equations hold for circuit shown in the figure: IN+ IN1 IN2 = (Kg = = = m1 = a,ref IN+ +,REF g m2a b IN1 g m2b + c IN2 ) R (1) and are the voltage levels proportional to the real CM level and AC amplitude of the output voltage respectively. As mentioned in section 2.1, these signals are sensed by the bulk pin of the CMFB input transistors. Using Equation (1), considering non-linear effects of CMOS transistors and adjusting the aspect ratios for transistors, any value can be achieved for a and b coefficients. Setting c equal to zero, term can be removed completely. 2.3 Charge Injection into the Output Nodes After the evaluation and amplification of error signal, the proper amount of current must be injected into the output nodes to correct the CM level. The used G m block circuit should be capable of both sourcing and sinking current with high output impedance such that the main OPAMP gain is not affected. The proposed G m circuit explored in this investigation is a CMOS inverter. Considering Figure 6, PMOS and NMOS transistors source or sink current to or from the output nodes. The difference between these two amounts of current can be known as the CMFB output current. Using an inverter as the G m block circuit has some advantages listed below: In a good system design, for desired output CM level the voltage at the input node of the inverter can be set around DD/2. This keeps both transistors in sub-threshold region, resulting in high output impedance for CMFB. Even in a case of poor system deign, of one of the transistors is larger GS than and the transistor is ON. Thus, the output T impedance of only one transistor is parallel to the output of the main amplifier. Because of the nonlinear transfer function of an inverter, the start of the process is fast and as the output CM approaches the desired value and the amplified error signal decreases, the current driving capability is diminished. This behavior results in fast response with reasonable amount of overshoot. Due to the nonlinear behavior of the inverter, the gain of this block is input-dependent. The open loop gain of the feedback decreases as signal amplitude increases. It leaves easier constraints for Phase Margin (PM) and Gain Margin (GM) of the average-error amplifier [1]. Simulation shows that an OPAMP with 3 degrees PM can be used and the feedback loop is very fast and stable as well. Figure 5. (a) Low-voltage amplifier proposed in [2] (b) The modified amplifier Figure 6. Full schematic of the proposed CMFB Figure 7. Low-voltage switched-opamp implemented 298

4 Finally, the complete transistor level scheme of the proposed CMFB is shown in Figure 6. Transistor M 10 in conjunction with I SS3 is used to set the source voltages of M in the predetermined range of value for DBB. 3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 3.1 OPAMP Design To evaluate the in-circuit performance of the developed CMFB, it is realized in a well-known low-voltage SO architecture shown in Figure 7. The OPAMP is the same as [2], except for four additional current sources, I ST1-4, added to increase the bias current of input transistors to enhance input G m. Without this modification, the quiescent current of M 2 and M 5 transistors increases as the current of input transistors rises. To achieve this, either W/L ratio or of these devices should be increased too. The later GS opposes low-voltage consideration and former will cause poor frequency response. Furthermore, mirror effect leads to the same amount of increase in the output stage which leads to more power consumption. Figure 8 shows the frequency response of the amplifier. To switch the amplifier the current paths from the power supplies to the circuit are interrupted with switches M SW1-2 [2]. It should be pointed out that for fast starting the bias circuit should not be switched OFF [2]. The same policy should be considered as switching strategy in CMFB. To satisfy the speed requirements, voltage sensing transistors, M 10-13, should not be switched OFF either. Figure 9 shows the output voltage of amplifier (zero AC amplitude) with initial conditions equal to 0 and 0.9. It s apparent that within less than 30nsec output CM voltage settles to 95% of the final value. Within this range, the small signal model can be assumed fixed [4]. While the gain of the amplifier equals to 60, applying a 20 KHz sinusoidal differential input signal with the amplitude of 0.4m results in output THD less than 0.5%. The error voltage as a function of the desired CM voltage is shown in Figure 10. Also Table 1 shows the characteristics of this amplifier operating at DD=0.9. Table 1. Implemented OPAMP characteristics Parameter alue Unit Open loop Gain 62.3 GBW (C L=4pf) 39.7 MHz Phase Margin 68 Degrees Supply oltage 0.9 Power Dissipation 43.7 µw Differential Output Swing ±0.8 CMOS Technology 0.18 µm Figure 8. Main OPAMP frequency response Figure 9. Output CM voltage settling Figure 10. Output CM voltage error 3.2. Delta-Sigma Modulator The simulated OTA with the proposed CMFB has been implemented in a cascade 2-1 low-voltage delta-sigma modulator. The accuracy and stability of the common-mode voltage in the implemented OTA and fast settling response are important for fast OTA switching. Although the allowable peak to peak output voltage swing for integrators is ±0.8, appropriate signal scaling coefficients [3] are considered to limit the output swing of each integrator as shown in Fig.11. Decreased range of voltages results in faster output settling. 299

5 The characteristics of the simulated cascade 2-1 Delta-Sigma modulator are listed in Table 2. Density Input Level (olt) Figure 11. Probability density function of integrator outputs in the realized cascade 2-1 delta-sigma modulator Figure 12. The simulated Delta-Sigma modulator output spectrum at DD=0.9 and 1 KHz sinusoidal input signal Measurements are performed at clock frequency of 4.096MHz and there is only 122nsec for each integrator output to settle. Figure 12 shows the simulated output spectrum at DD=0.9 and 1 KHz sinusoidal input signal. Considering over-sampling rate equal to 128, the measured dynamic range is 105 and the peak SNDR is (16.5-bit). Total power dissipation is 160µWatt. Several units like OTAs, switches, bias circuit, comparators, logic and clock generation circuits contribute to this power consumption. As mentioned in Table 1, implemented OTA dissipates 43.7µWatt. Noting the modulator includes three integrators (three OTAs) and every OTA is ON for half of the period, the total theoretical amount of power needed for OTAs is 66µWatt. As simulation shows, the real amount of power differs from the theoretical value. The measured power dissipated by OTAs is 97µWatt and the difference is due to the CMFB strategy. As explained in section 2.3, an inverter is realized as the output G m module. After switching ON the OTA, to adjust the output CM level a large amount of current is injected into output nodes. This short while current causes the difference between the theoretical and the measured value of the power dissipated by OTAs. Table 2. The implemented cascade 2-1 Σ modulator specs Parameter alue Unit Dynamic Range Peak SNDR Overload Level Sampling Rate Over-sampling Ratio Signal Bandwidth Power Supply oltage Power Dissipation CMOS Technology 4. CONCLUSION MHz KHz µw µm A continuous-time CMFB circuit is presented. The technique used to estimate CM level is based on the monitoring of T variation due to bulk signal equal to output voltage of the main amplifier. Because of integrating the averaging, comparing and amplifying units in a single block and using an inverter as the output G m block, the short simulated settling time makes the CMFB strategy ideal for fast SO circuits. The reported result of the implemented OPAMP has proven the superior performance of the proposed CMFB. Also the realized OPAMP with the proposed CMFB circuitry is used in a cascade 2-1 low-voltage Delta-Sigma modulator. Limited voltage range for each integrator output and short settling time of output CM level permits faster OTA switching. The simulation results confirm the expected accuracy and speed of the CMFB circuitry in SO circuits. 5. REFERENCES [1] Dorf, R.C., Bishop, R.H., Modern Control Systems, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts, [2] Peluso,., Steyart, M., and Sansen, W., Design of Low- oltage Low-Power CMOS Delta-Sigma A/D Converters. Kluwer Academic, Boston, [3] Rabii, Sh., Wooley, B. A., The Design of low-voltage, lowpower Sigma-Delta Modulators. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, [4] Razavi, B., Design of Analog CMOS integrated Circuits, McGraw-Hill, Boston, [5] Waltari, M., Halonen, K., A Switched-Opamp With Fast Common Mode Feedback, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Sept 1999, Pafos, Cyprus, pp [6] Yan, S., and Sanchez-Sinencioo, S., Low-oltage Analog Circuit Design Techniques: a Tutorial, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, ol.e83-a, No.2 February