Detection and Characterization of MIMO Radar Signals
|
|
- Dominick Simon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Detection and Characterization of MIMO Radar Signals Stephen Howard and Songsri Sirianunpiboon Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO Box 500, Edinburgh 5, Australia Douglas Cochran School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences Arizona State University, Tempe AZ USA Abstract Motivated by electronic surveillance applications, this paper considers the problems of detecting the presence of and characterizing a radar transmitter using data collected at a spatially distributed suite of receivers. A characterization of particular interest is determining the rank of the transmitted signal, which enables discrimination between MIMO and conventional radar transmitters as well as distinguishing between MIMO systems that simultaneously emit different numbers of linearly independent signals from their transmit arrays. Bayesian detectors are derived and their performance is demonstrated in simulations. Generalized likelihood ratio tests are also derived and some drawbacks they manifest in this setting are noted. I. INTRODUCTION Numerous multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) radar concepts have been explored in research literature over the past decade [] [4]. Among these is the idea of using a transmit array consisting of K 2 closely-spaced elements that emit linearly independent waveforms. In what follows, Friedlander s convention of reserving the term MIMO radar for schemes involving spatial waveform diversity in a phased array radar, while using multistatic radar to mean that transmit and receive components are spatially distributed [6]. This paper takes the perspective of electronic surveillance (ES), where typical goals are to detect and characterize radio frequency (RF) signals and to localize their sources using passive means. Specifically, it is assumed that data are collected by a suite of M spatially distributed receivers with the objectives of detecting and characterizing radar transmissions. Although the elements in the transmit array may be well separated in terms of the wavelength of the carrier frequency, in the far-field they are essentially co-located on the scale of wavelengths present in the baseband waveform. So, as discussed in more detail in Sec. III, K linearly independent transmit waveforms will define a K-dimensional subspace of the space of signals collected across the receiver array. The problem of detecting a common but unknown signal of known rank K using data collected at M spatially distributed receivers has been addressed in recent signal processing literature [7], [8]. This paper extends the approaches developed Some highly credible radar experts have pointed out that the practical advantages of such MIMO radar approaches have probably been overstated in much of the research literature on the subject, e.g., [5]. While the authors agree with this assessment, the intent here is to examine the detectability of MIMO radar signals from an electronic surveillance perspective rather than to remark on other merits of MIMO radar. in [8] to the problem of MIMO radar signal characterization. Specifically, statistical tests are developed for discriminating between a signal of known rank K and a noise-only null hypothesis. These tests lead to tests for a MIMO (i.e., rank K 2) signal versus a conventional (i.e., rank-one) signal, for rank-k versus rank-j MIMO signals, and for a signal rank estimator, all using data collected at M > K spatially distributed receivers. Notation: In this paper, vectors are denoted by bold lowercase symbols and bold uppercase symbols are used for matrices. T denotes transpose, Hermitian transpose, Tr trace, and I n the n n identity matrix. II. ES VIEW OF MIMO RADAR Consider a scenario in which a MIMO radar with a K- element transmit array simultaneously emits K linearly independent waveforms, s(t) = (s (t), s 2 (t),..., s K (t)) T, where each s k (t) represents a complex baseband signal. Let a(k) = (a (k), a 2 (k),..., a K (k)) T denote the transmit array steering vector in the direction k. In the far field, the transmitted waveform in the direction k can be modeled as y(t) = a(k) s(t)e 2πifct where f c is the carrier frequency of the radar. The signal transmitted by this MIMO radar impinges on M > K spatially distributed receivers of a surveillance system. The baseband signal collected at the m th receiver is x m (t) = α m a(k m ) s(t τ m )e 2πifmt + ν m (t), where α m C accounts for path loss and antenna gain for the m th receiver and includes the carrier phase. In this expression, τ m = r m r 0 /c is the travel time from the transmit array at position r 0 to the m th receiver at position r m and c denotes the speed of light. The Doppler shift at the m th receiver is f m = f c (v m v 0 ) k m /c, where v 0 is the velocity of the transmitter and v m the velocity of the receiver. Finally, ν m (t) is additive white Gaussian noise on receiver channel m which is assumed to be uncorrelated from channel to channel. III. PROBLEM FORMULATION Suppose there is a MIMO radar transmitter with K > elements at a position r 0 and with velocity v 0. Then, for m =
2 ,..., M, x m (t τ +τ m )=α m a(k m ) s(t τ )e 2πifmt +ν m (t τ +τ m ) () This expression shows that, when suitably adjusted to account for time differences of arrival and Doppler shifts, the M received signal components span a K-dimensional space defined by a common time-frequency shift of the K transmitted signals. The problem of detecting the presence of an emitter at a given candidate location r 0 and velocity v 0 is addressed in [8] and further examined below. Two additional objectives of interest for ES in this scenario are: () test whether the emitter is a MIMO (rank K > ) transmitter versus a conventional (rank K = ) transmitter; and (2) estimate the number K of linearly independent waveforms being transmitted. The tests developed here thus concern the hypotheses H K : A rank-k transmitter is at position r 0 with velocity v 0, for K =, 2,.... The following paragraph describes how the hypothesis H K manifests in the test data. Each received signal x m (t) is shifted to baseband, compensated for time delays and Doppler shifts corresponding to the values of r 0 and v 0 being considered in the test, and sampled at an appropriate rate to obtain a set of M complex N-vectors. These vectors of received data are grouped into an M N matrix X. Define S to be a K N matrix whose rows are orthonormal (i.e., SS = I K ) and span the signal subspace. Then under H K, X can be written as X = AS + N (2) where A is a complex M K matrix with elements A ij = α i a j (k i ) and the elements of the noise matrix N are independent with N ij CN (0, σ 2 ). The K N matrix S defines the K-dimensional signal subspace. The values of A, S and σ 2 are assumed to be unknown. The first problem considered in this paper is testing the hypothesis H K that a phased array MIMO radar is at (r 0, v 0 ) against the alternative hypothesis that the collected signal is just receiver noise; i.e., the detection problem is H K : X = A K S K + N H 0 : X = N The likelihood ratio for testing H K versus H J may be obtained as the quotient of the likelihood ratios for the tests of H K versus H 0 and H J versus H 0. Thus solving (3) also addresses the problem of distinguishing H K from H J. This allows estimation of K in an obvious way, which is discussed explicitly in Sec. IV-C and illustrated in Sec. V. IV. RANK-K MIMO RADAR DETECTION In this section the likelihood ratio for the detection problem (3) is derived using a Bayesian approach for elimination of the nuisance parameters. The generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) for this problem is also discussed briefly. Under H 0, the probability density function (pdf) of X conditioned on σ 2 is p(x σ 2 ) = (πσ 2 ) MN e N σ 2 Tr(W) (4) (3) where W = N X X. Under H K the pdf of X conditioned on A K, S K and σ 2 is p(x A K, S K, σ 2 ) = (πσ 2 ) MN e σ 2 Tr(X A KS K )(X A K S K ) = (πσ 2 ) MN e N σ 2 Tr((I N P V )W) e σ 2 Tr((A K XS K )(A K XS K ) where P V = S K S K is the orthogonal projection onto the subspace V spanned by the rows of S K. A. Generalized likelihood ratio test The GLRT is obtained by considering the ratio of maximal values of the joint likelihood functions with respect to the unknown or nuisance parameters under hypotheses H 0 and H K as follows: max AK,S K,σ 2 p(x A K, S K, σ 2 ) max σ 2 p(x σ 2 ) (5) H K H 0 γ. (6) Maximizing the likelihood functions (4) and (5) with respect to A K, σ 2 and S K and substituting the maximum values back into (6), yields (see [8] for the details of the maximization with respect to P V ) ( ) K MN GLR = λ i N λ i where λ > λ 2 > > λ N are eigenvalues of W. Note that the non-zero eigenvalues of W are exactly the eigenvalues of the sample-covariance matrix ˆR = XX /N. The value of P V which maximizes the numerator of (6) is the maximum likelihood estimator of P V, K ˆP V = v k v k (7) k= where {v k k =,, K} are the normalized eigenvectors of W corresponding to its K largest eigenvalues. An unfortunate property of this generalized likelihood ratio is that as the hypothesized rank K is increased, the hypotheses H K become increasingly likely relative to H 0. It is shown below that the Bayesian detector is much better behaved in this respect. B. Bayesian Test and Rank Posterior In the Bayesian approach, instead of formulating maximumlikelihood estimates of the nuisance parameters P V and σ 2, each nuisance parameter is marginalized out of the likelihood function by integration with respect to an appropriate prior probability distribution. That is, p(x H 0 ) = p(x AK,P V,σ 2 )p(a K )p(σ 2 )da K dσ 2 dµ(p V ) p(x σ2 )p(σ 2 )dσ 2 where the integrals are over the appropriate parameter spaces. First, using the uniform prior for A K, i.e., p(a K ) =, p(x P V, σ 2 ) = (πσ 2 ) M() e N σ 2 Tr((I N P V )W) (8)
3 Using the prior pdf for σ 2 as given in [8], p(σ 2 I M ) = τ Mq Γ M (q)σ 2M(q ) e τmσ 2 then under H 0, the marginalized (with respect to σ 2 ) likelihood is p(x H 0, q, τ) = τ Mq ( Γ(p) π MN Γ M N(Tr(D) + Mτ ) p (q) N ) where p = M(N + q ) +, q > N /M and D is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues λ > λ 2 > > λ N of W. The grassmannian space G K,N is the space of all K- dimensional subspace of C N. It is a smooth complex manifold of complex dimension K(N K). Each orthogonal projector P V can be identified with a point in G K,N. The non-informative prior distribution for P V can be taken as the invariant measure on grassmannian G K,N. Under H K the likelihood marginalized with respect to σ 2 and P V is = τ Mq Γ(p MK) π M() Γ M (q) ( N(Tr(D) Tr(DP V )+ Mτ ) (p MK) N ) dµ(p V ) G K,N where dµ(p V ) denotes the invariant measure on G K,N. The likelihood ratio becomes, upon setting q = and taking the limit τ 0, p(x H 0 ) = c(tr(d))mk ( Tr( DP V )) M() dµ(p V ) G K,N where c = (Nπ) MK Γ(M()+)/Γ(MN+) and D = D/Tr(D). To compute the integral, it is necessary to parameterize P V in terms of local coordinates on G K,N. Using the results in [9], [8] ( ) (IK + Z P V = Z) (I K + Z Z) Z Z(I K + Z Z) Z(I K + Z Z) Z (0) where Z C () K. In these coordinates the normalized invariant measure on G K,N takes the form where dµ(p V )= vol(g K,N ) det(i K Z Z) N dz dz = j= K dre (z ij )dim (z ij ) and vol(g K,N ) denotes the volume of the grassmannian N l=+ vol(g K,N ) = A 2l K l= A () 2l where A l is the area of the unit sphere in R l, A l = 2πl/2 Γ(l/2). (9) Substituting (0)-() into (9) gives c(tr(d)) MK e p log( Tr( DP V )) N log det(i K +Z Z) dz vol(g K,N ) Z C () K where p = M(N K)+. The integral can be approximated, using Laplace approximation along with some matrix identities which are given in [8], as c(tr(d)) MK vol(g K,N )( Tr( D K )) p K e γp ( λ i λ K+j +δ) z ij 2 dz ij j= z ij where δ = N γp, γ = ( Tr( D K )) and D K = D K /Tr(D) where D K is diagonal matrix with the first K eigenvalues of D and λ = λ/ N i= λ i. The likelihood ratio is then ( p(x H 0 ) = N c λ i ) MK( K j= K λ i λ K+j +δ where c = c( π p ) K() /vol(g K,N ). ) p +K() λ i C. Posterior distribution for the rank of the radar (2) The likelihood ratios given in equation (2) can be used to construct the posterior distribution for K. Denoting the prior probabilities for H K, K = 0,, M as p(h K ), the probability of a rank-k transmitter at position r 0 is given by p(k r 0 ) = p(h 0)+ M K= p(h 0) p(k)p(x K,r0)/p(X H0), if K = 0 p(h K )p(x H K,r 0)/p(X H 0) p(h M 0)+ K= p(h K)p(X H K,r 0)/p(X H 0), otherwise. (3) Note that, with M receivers, only signals with rank up to K = M can be distinguished. V. SIMULATIONS In this section, the performance of the Bayesian rank-k signal detector derived above is evaluated through simulation. A rank-4 MIMO radar simultaneously transmitting four orthogonal waveforms is simulated. The transmitter consists of a four-element uniform linear array with half wavelength spacing at 9.4GHz carrier frequency. The waveform consists of a CPI of sixteen, four-channel binary phase coded pulses with a pulse repetition interval (PRI) of 00µs. Each pulse has a code consisting of a Hadamard sequence (row of a Hadamard matrix) of length 28 with chip length of 00ns. The four channels have mutually orthogonal Hadamard sequences. The ES receiver system consists of eight sensors distributed as shown in Figure. The total distance spanned by the receivers is kilometers and with the most distant receiver at range 4.862km from the radar. The power of the received signals is set relative to the shortest ranges from the radar to the closest sensor, which is 3.90 kilometers and is normalized to unit
4 y(km) Fig.. Log likelihood ratio x x(km) Tx Rx Configuration of transmitter and receivers for the simulation Rank 5dB 3dB 2dB 8dB 5dB 4dB 3dB Fig. 2. Log-likelihood ratio values for the hypothesized signal rank K =,..., 7 at different SNRs. power. The SNR is defined by SNR = 0 log 0 σ 2, where σ 2 is noise power per complex dimension. For simplicity, the transmitters and receivers are assumed to be mutually stationary. Figure 3 shows plots of the likelihood ratio (2) at 4dB SNR for rank K =, 2,..., 7. The results show that the detector is able to detect signals at the transmitter s position at (2.995, 4.550) and correctly identify the signal rank as K = 4. The last sub-figure shows plots of log probability ratio (3) which clearly demonstrate that the highest probability occurs at rank 4. Figure 4 shows the performance of the detector in the same scenario as in Fig. 3, except that the signal rank is now ; i.e., it is a conventional phased array radar with all four elements transmitting the same waveform. The simulation was carried out with phased coded waveform with the same properties as in the rank-4 signal simulation, but at 5dB SNR. As shown, the detector is able to identify/distinguish between rank- and rank-k, K >. The last sub-figure shows the plots of log probability ratio (3) which clearly demonstrates the highest probability occurs at rank-. Figure 2 shows results obtained from the same scenarios as in Fig. 3 for a range of SNRs from 3 to 5dB. The figure shows the plots of the expected log likelihood ratio, averaged over 500 realizations in each case, against rank at the different SNRs. For this scenario, the detector is able to identify as rank-4 signal if SNR 3dB. VI. CONCLUSION An important message to take from the analysis of the MIMO radar detector developed in this paper is that, if one wants to accurately determine the presence and rank of such a radar, one needs numerous ES receivers or high SNR as the rank increases. For a MIMO radar of rank K, at least K + 2 receivers are needed. Further, as K increases, the receivers need to have wide spatial separation in order to ascertain the rank of the radar. Of course, in ES applications, one would also like to estimate the subspace spanned by the signals transmitted by the radar. The current analysis suggests methods for achieving this (Eq. (0)), and this topic will be taken up in a subsequent publication. The problem of determining the actual signals transmitted by the radar rather than just the subspace they span appears daunting, as this requires simultaneous determination of the configuration and orientation of the radar s transmit array. REFERENCES [] E. Brookner. (203, Jan.) MIMO Radar: Demystified. [Online]. Available: [2] B. Friedlander, On the role of waveform diversity in MIMO radar, in Proc. Signals, System and Computers ASILOMAR, Forty Fifth Conference, Nov. 20, pp [3] G. J. Frazer, Y. Abramovich, and B. A. Johnson, Spatially waveform diverse radar: Perspectives for HF OTHR, in Proc. IEEE Radar Conference 2007, Boston, MA, 2007, pp [4] J. Li and P. Stoica, MIMO Radar Signal Processing. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., [5] F. Daum and J. Huang, MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea? IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 8 2, [6] B. Friedlander, On signal models for MIMO radar, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 48, no. 4, pp , 202. [7] D. Ramírez, G. Vazquez-Vilar, R. López-Valcarce, J. Vía, and I. Santamaría, Detection of rank-p signals in cognitive radio networks with uncalibrated multiple antennas, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 8, pp , 20. [8] S. Sirianunpiboon, S. D. Howard, and D. Cochran, Multiple-channel detection of signals having known rank, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 203, pp [9] A. T. James, Normal multivariate analysis and the orthogonal group, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 25, no., pp , 954.
5 Fig. 3. Plots of likelihood ratio between the rank-k signal hypothesis H K, K =,..., 7, and the noise-only hypothesis H 0 for a rank-4 (MIMO) phased array radar signal. Fig. 4. Plots of likelihood ratio between the rank-k signal hypothesis H K, K =,..., 7, and the noise-only hypothesis H 0 for a rank- (conventional) phased array radar signal.
SIGNAL MODEL AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR COLOCATED MIMO RADAR
SIGNAL MODEL AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR COLOCATED MIMO RADAR Moein Ahmadi*, Kamal Mohamed-pour K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran.*moein@ee.kntu.ac.ir, kmpour@kntu.ac.ir Keywords: Multiple-input
More informationAntennas and Propagation. Chapter 6b: Path Models Rayleigh, Rician Fading, MIMO
Antennas and Propagation b: Path Models Rayleigh, Rician Fading, MIMO Introduction From last lecture How do we model H p? Discrete path model (physical, plane waves) Random matrix models (forget H p and
More informationMIMO Receiver Design in Impulsive Noise
COPYRIGHT c 007. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 MIMO Receiver Design in Impulsive Noise Aditya Chopra and Kapil Gulati Final Project Report Advanced Space Time Communications Prof. Robert Heath December 7 th,
More informationThis is a repository copy of Robust DOA estimation for a mimo array using two calibrated transmit sensors.
This is a repository copy of Robust DOA estimation for a mimo array using two calibrated transmit sensors. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/76522/ Proceedings
More informationJoint DOA and Array Manifold Estimation for a MIMO Array Using Two Calibrated Antennas
1 Joint DOA and Array Manifold Estimation for a MIMO Array Using Two Calibrated Antennas Wei Zhang #, Wei Liu, Siliang Wu #, and Ju Wang # # Department of Information and Electronics Beijing Institute
More informationAdaptive Beamforming Applied for Signals Estimated with MUSIC Algorithm
Buletinul Ştiinţific al Universităţii "Politehnica" din Timişoara Seria ELECTRONICĂ şi TELECOMUNICAŢII TRANSACTIONS on ELECTRONICS and COMMUNICATIONS Tom 57(71), Fascicola 2, 2012 Adaptive Beamforming
More informationMIMO Channel Capacity in Co-Channel Interference
MIMO Channel Capacity in Co-Channel Interference Yi Song and Steven D. Blostein Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6 E-mail: {songy, sdb}@ee.queensu.ca
More informationMultipath Effect on Covariance Based MIMO Radar Beampattern Design
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJE) ISS (e): 225-32, ISS (p): 2278-879 Vol. 4, Issue 9 (September. 24), V2 PP 43-52 www.iosrjen.org Multipath Effect on Covariance Based MIMO Radar Beampattern Design Amirsadegh
More informationThe fundamentals of detection theory
Advanced Signal Processing: The fundamentals of detection theory Side 1 of 18 Index of contents: Advanced Signal Processing: The fundamentals of detection theory... 3 1 Problem Statements... 3 2 Detection
More informationAsymptotically Optimal Detection/ Localization of LPI Signals of Emitters using Distributed Sensors
Asymptotically Optimal Detection/ Localization of LPI Signals of Emitters using Distributed Sensors aresh Vankayalapati and Steven Kay Dept. of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering University
More informationBluetooth Angle Estimation for Real-Time Locationing
Whitepaper Bluetooth Angle Estimation for Real-Time Locationing By Sauli Lehtimäki Senior Software Engineer, Silicon Labs silabs.com Smart. Connected. Energy-Friendly. Bluetooth Angle Estimation for Real-
More informationDIVERSE RADAR PULSE-TRAIN WITH FAVOURABLE AUTOCORRELATION AND AMBIGUITY FUNCTIONS
DIVERSE RADAR PULSE-TRAIN WITH FAVOURABLE AUTOCORRELATION AND AMBIGUITY FUNCTIONS E. Mozeson and N. Levanon Tel-Aviv University, Israel Abstract. A coherent train of identical Linear-FM pulses is a popular
More informationDynamic Fair Channel Allocation for Wideband Systems
Outlines Introduction and Motivation Dynamic Fair Channel Allocation for Wideband Systems Department of Mobile Communications Eurecom Institute Sophia Antipolis 19/10/2006 Outline of Part I Outlines Introduction
More informationEigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Array Antennas. Optimization of Array Antennas for High Performance. Self-introduction
Short Course @ISAP2010 in MACAO Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Array Antennas Optimization of Array Antennas for High Performance Nobuyoshi Kikuma Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan 1 Self-introduction
More informationChannel Probability Ensemble Update for Multiplatform Radar Systems
Channel Probability Ensemble Update for Multiplatform Radar Systems Ric A. Romero, Christopher M. Kenyon, and Nathan A. Goodman Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA
More informationA Blind Array Receiver for Multicarrier DS-CDMA in Fading Channels
A Blind Array Receiver for Multicarrier DS-CDMA in Fading Channels David J. Sadler and A. Manikas IEE Electronics Letters, Vol. 39, No. 6, 20th March 2003 Abstract A modified MMSE receiver for multicarrier
More informationMIMO Wireless Communications
MIMO Wireless Communications Speaker: Sau-Hsuan Wu Date: 2008 / 07 / 15 Department of Communication Engineering, NCTU Outline 2 2 MIMO wireless channels MIMO transceiver MIMO precoder Outline 3 3 MIMO
More informationWaveform-Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Distributed Aperture Radars
Waveform-Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Distributed Aperture Radars Raviraj S. Adve, Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Eng., University of Toronto Richard A. Schneible, Stiefvater Consultants, Marcy, NY Gerard
More informationA Design of the Matched Filter for the Passive Radar Sensor
Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Signal, Speech and Image Processing, Beijing, China, September 15-17, 7 11 A Design of the atched Filter for the Passive Radar Sensor FUIO NISHIYAA
More informationAntennas and Propagation. Chapter 5c: Array Signal Processing and Parametric Estimation Techniques
Antennas and Propagation : Array Signal Processing and Parametric Estimation Techniques Introduction Time-domain Signal Processing Fourier spectral analysis Identify important frequency-content of signal
More informationLecture 5: Antenna Diversity and MIMO Capacity Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1
Antenna, Antenna : Antenna and Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1 Friday, April 27, 2018 9:30-12:00, Kansliet plan 3 1 Textbook: D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication
More informationDiversity and Multiplexing: A Fundamental Tradeoff in Wireless Systems
Diversity and Multiplexing: A Fundamental Tradeoff in Wireless Systems David Tse Department of EECS, U.C. Berkeley June 6, 2003 UCSB Wireless Fading Channels Fundamental characteristic of wireless channels:
More informationPerformance Analysis of MUSIC and MVDR DOA Estimation Algorithm
Volume-8, Issue-2, April 2018 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Page Number: 50-55 Performance Analysis of MUSIC and MVDR DOA Estimation Algorithm Bhupenmewada 1, Prof. Kamal
More informationAdaptive Wireless. Communications. gl CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. MIMO Channels and Networks SIDDHARTAN GOVJNDASAMY DANIEL W.
Adaptive Wireless Communications MIMO Channels and Networks DANIEL W. BLISS Arizona State University SIDDHARTAN GOVJNDASAMY Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Massachusetts gl CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
More informationSmart antenna for doa using music and esprit
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSRJECE) ISSN : 2278-2834 Volume 1, Issue 1 (May-June 2012), PP 12-17 Smart antenna for doa using music and esprit SURAYA MUBEEN 1, DR.A.M.PRASAD
More informationSpectrum Sharing Between Matrix Completion Based MIMO Radars and A MIMO Communication System
Spectrum Sharing Between Matrix Completion Based MIMO Radars and A MIMO Communication System Bo Li and Athina Petropulu April 23, 2015 ECE Department, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA Work
More informationSUPERRESOLUTION methods refer to techniques that
Engineering Letters, 19:1, EL_19_1_2 An Improved Spatial Smoothing Technique for DoA Estimation of Highly Correlated Signals Avi Abu Abstract Spatial superresolution techniques have been investigated for
More informationAdaptive MIMO Radar for Target Detection, Estimation, and Tracking
Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 5-24-2012 Adaptive MIMO Radar for Target Detection, Estimation, and Tracking Sandeep Gogineni
More informationA Novel SINR Estimation Scheme for WCDMA Receivers
1 A Novel SINR Estimation Scheme for WCDMA Receivers Venkateswara Rao M 1 R. David Koilpillai 2 1 Flextronics Software Systems, Bangalore 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai - 36.
More informationNon Unuiform Phased array Beamforming with Covariance Based Method
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJE) e-iss: 50-301, p-iss: 78-8719, Volume, Issue 10 (October 01), PP 37-4 on Unuiform Phased array Beamforming with Covariance Based Method Amirsadegh Roshanzamir 1, M.
More informationAdaptive Systems Homework Assignment 3
Signal Processing and Speech Communication Lab Graz University of Technology Adaptive Systems Homework Assignment 3 The analytical part of your homework (your calculation sheets) as well as the MATLAB
More informationRevision of Lecture Twenty-Eight
ELEC64 Advanced Wireless Communications Networks and Systems Revision of Lecture Twenty-Eight MIMO classification: roughly three classes create diversity, increase throughput, support multi-users Some
More informationAdaptive Waveforms for Target Class Discrimination
Adaptive Waveforms for Target Class Discrimination Jun Hyeong Bae and Nathan A. Goodman Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Arizona 3 E. Speedway Blvd, Tucson, Arizona 857 dolbit@email.arizona.edu;
More informationWaveform Libraries for Radar Tracking Applications: Maneuvering Targets
Waveform Libraries for Radar Tracking Applications: Maneuvering Targets S. Suvorova and S. D. Howard Defence Science and Technology Organisation, PO BOX 1500, Edinburgh 5111, Australia W. Moran and R.
More informationDirection-of-Arrival Estimation and Cramer-Rao Bound for Multi-Carrier MIMO Radar
06 4th European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO Direction-of-Arrival Estimation and Cramer-Rao Bound for Multi-Carrier MIMO Radar Michael Ulrich, Kilian Rambach and Bin Yang Institute of Signal Processing
More informationBlock Processing Linear Equalizer for MIMO CDMA Downlinks in STTD Mode
Block Processing Linear Equalizer for MIMO CDMA Downlinks in STTD Mode Yan Li Yingxue Li Abstract In this study, an enhanced chip-level linear equalizer is proposed for multiple-input multiple-out (MIMO)
More informationMatched filter. Contents. Derivation of the matched filter
Matched filter From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In telecommunications, a matched filter (originally known as a North filter [1] ) is obtained by correlating a known signal, or template, with an unknown
More information[P7] c 2006 IEEE. Reprinted with permission from:
[P7 c 006 IEEE. Reprinted with permission from: Abdulla A. Abouda, H.M. El-Sallabi and S.G. Häggman, Effect of Mutual Coupling on BER Performance of Alamouti Scheme," in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium
More informationCOHERENT DEMODULATION OF CONTINUOUS PHASE BINARY FSK SIGNALS
COHERENT DEMODULATION OF CONTINUOUS PHASE BINARY FSK SIGNALS M. G. PELCHAT, R. C. DAVIS, and M. B. LUNTZ Radiation Incorporated Melbourne, Florida 32901 Summary This paper gives achievable bounds for the
More informationISAR Imaging Radar with Time-Domain High-Range Resolution Algorithms and Array Antenna
ISAR Imaging Radar with Time-Domain High-Range Resolution Algorithms and Array Antenna Christian Bouchard, étudiant 2 e cycle Dr Dominic Grenier, directeur de recherche Abstract: To increase range resolution
More informationSingle snapshot DOA estimation
Manuscript prepared for Adv. Radio Sci. with version 3.2 of the L A TEX class copernicus.cls. Date: 30 September 2010 Single snapshot DOA estimation P. Häcker and B. Yang Chair of System Theory and Signal
More informationTransmit Antenna Selection in Linear Receivers: a Geometrical Approach
Transmit Antenna Selection in Linear Receivers: a Geometrical Approach I. Berenguer, X. Wang and I.J. Wassell Abstract: We consider transmit antenna subset selection in spatial multiplexing systems. In
More informationMassive MIMO: Signal Structure, Efficient Processing, and Open Problems I
Massive MIMO: Signal Structure, Efficient Processing, and Open Problems I Saeid Haghighatshoar Communications and Information Theory Group (CommIT) Technische Universität Berlin CoSIP Winter Retreat Berlin,
More informationWaveform-Agile Sensing for Range and DoA Estimation in MIMO Radars
Waveform-Agile ensing for Range and DoA Estimation in MIMO Radars Bhavana B. Manjunath, Jun Jason Zhang, Antonia Papandreou-uppappola, and Darryl Morrell enip Center, Department of Electrical Engineering,
More informationMOVING TARGET DETECTION IN AIRBORNE MIMO RADAR FOR FLUCTUATING TARGET RCS MODEL. Shabnam Ghotbi,Moein Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali Sebt
MOVING TARGET DETECTION IN AIRBORNE MIMO RADAR FOR FLUCTUATING TARGET RCS MODEL Shabnam Ghotbi,Moein Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali Sebt K.N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran, Iran, Emails: shghotbi@mail.kntu.ac.ir,
More informationMultiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Operation Principles
Afriyie Abraham Kwabena Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Operation Principles Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachlor of Engineering Information Technology Thesis June 0 Abstract
More informationNeural Blind Separation for Electromagnetic Source Localization and Assessment
Neural Blind Separation for Electromagnetic Source Localization and Assessment L. Albini, P. Burrascano, E. Cardelli, A. Faba, S. Fiori Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Perugia Via G.
More informationAn Improved DBF Processor with a Large Receiving Antenna for Echoes Separation in Spaceborne SAR
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 67, 49 57, 216 An Improved DBF Processor a Large Receiving Antenna for Echoes Separation in Spaceborne SAR Hongbo Mo 1, *,WeiXu 2, and Zhimin Zeng 1 Abstract
More informationBeamforming in Interference Networks for Uniform Linear Arrays
Beamforming in Interference Networks for Uniform Linear Arrays Rami Mochaourab and Eduard Jorswieck Communications Theory, Communications Laboratory Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany e-mail:
More informationA Novel Adaptive Method For The Blind Channel Estimation And Equalization Via Sub Space Method
A Novel Adaptive Method For The Blind Channel Estimation And Equalization Via Sub Space Method Pradyumna Ku. Mohapatra 1, Pravat Ku.Dash 2, Jyoti Prakash Swain 3, Jibanananda Mishra 4 1,2,4 Asst.Prof.Orissa
More informationADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. TYPES OF BEAMFORMING
ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS TYPES OF BEAMFORMING 1 1- Outlines This chapter will introduce : Essential terminologies for beamforming; BF Demonstrating the function of the complex weights and how the phase and amplitude
More informationPerformance Analysis of MUSIC and LMS Algorithms for Smart Antenna Systems
nternational Journal of Electronics Engineering, 2 (2), 200, pp. 27 275 Performance Analysis of USC and LS Algorithms for Smart Antenna Systems d. Bakhar, Vani R.. and P.V. unagund 2 Department of E and
More informationInterference of Chirp Sequence Radars by OFDM Radars at 77 GHz
Interference of Chirp Sequence Radars by OFDM Radars at 77 GHz Christina Knill, Jonathan Bechter, and Christian Waldschmidt 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must
More informationTRANSMITS BEAMFORMING AND RECEIVER DESIGN FOR MIMO RADAR
TRANSMITS BEAMFORMING AND RECEIVER DESIGN FOR MIMO RADAR 1 Nilesh Arun Bhavsar,MTech Student,ECE Department,PES S COE Pune, Maharastra,India 2 Dr.Arati J. Vyavahare, Professor, ECE Department,PES S COE
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.sd] 4 Dec 2018
LOCALIZATION AND TRACKING OF AN ACOUSTIC SOURCE USING A DIAGONAL UNLOADING BEAMFORMING AND A KALMAN FILTER Daniele Salvati, Carlo Drioli, Gian Luca Foresti Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and
More informationArray Calibration in the Presence of Multipath
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL 48, NO 1, JANUARY 2000 53 Array Calibration in the Presence of Multipath Amir Leshem, Member, IEEE, Mati Wax, Fellow, IEEE Abstract We present an algorithm for
More informationUNDERWATER ACOUSTIC CHANNEL ESTIMATION AND ANALYSIS
Proceedings of the 5th Annual ISC Research Symposium ISCRS 2011 April 7, 2011, Rolla, Missouri UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC CHANNEL ESTIMATION AND ANALYSIS Jesse Cross Missouri University of Science and Technology
More informationA New Subspace Identification Algorithm for High-Resolution DOA Estimation
1382 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 50, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002 A New Subspace Identification Algorithm for High-Resolution DOA Estimation Michael L. McCloud, Member, IEEE, and Louis
More informationSignal Processing Algorithm of Space Time Coded Waveforms for Coherent MIMO Radar: Overview on Target Localization
Signal Processing Algorithm of Space Time Coded Waveforms for Coherent MIMO Radar Overview on Target Localization Samiran Pramanik, 1 Nirmalendu Bikas Sinha, 2 C.K. Sarkar 3 1 College of Engineering &
More informationTarget Tracking Using Monopulse MIMO Radar With Distributed Antennas
Target Tracking Using Monopulse MIMO Radar With Distributed Antennas Sandeep Gogineni, Student Member, IEEE and Arye Nehorai, Fellow, IEEE Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering Washington University
More informationAdaptive Transmit and Receive Beamforming for Interference Mitigation
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2014 235 Adaptive Transmit Receive Beamforming for Interference Mitigation Zhu Chen, Student Member, IEEE, Hongbin Li, Senior Member, IEEE, GuolongCui,
More informationON SAMPLING ISSUES OF A VIRTUALLY ROTATING MIMO ANTENNA. Robert Bains, Ralf Müller
ON SAMPLING ISSUES OF A VIRTUALLY ROTATING MIMO ANTENNA Robert Bains, Ralf Müller Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Norwegian University of Science and Technology 7491 Trondheim, Norway
More informationSpatial Correlation Effects on Channel Estimation of UCA-MIMO Receivers
11 International Conference on Communication Engineering and Networks IPCSIT vol.19 (11) (11) IACSIT Press, Singapore Spatial Correlation Effects on Channel Estimation of UCA-MIMO Receivers M. A. Mangoud
More informationAmultiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar uses multiple
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 55, NO. 6, JUNE 2007 2375 Iterative Generalized-Likelihood Ratio Test for MIMO Radar Luzhou Xu Jian Li, Fellow, IEEE Abstract We consider a multiple-input multiple-output
More informationSPACE TIME CODING FOR MIMO SYSTEMS. Fernando H. Gregorio
SPACE TIME CODING FOR MIMO SYSTEMS Fernando H. Gregorio Helsinki University of Technology Signal Processing Laboratory, POB 3000, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland E-mail:Fernando.Gregorio@hut.fi ABSTRACT With space-time
More informationCopyright 2013 IEEE. Published in the IEEE 2013 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2013), scheduled for
Copyright 2013 IEEE. Published in the IEEE 2013 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2013), scheduled for 26-31 May 2013 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
More informationAdaptive Beamforming. Chapter Signal Steering Vectors
Chapter 13 Adaptive Beamforming We have already considered deterministic beamformers for such applications as pencil beam arrays and arrays with controlled sidelobes. Beamformers can also be developed
More informationWHY THE PHASED-MIMO RADAR OUTPERFORMS THE PHASED-ARRAY AND MIMO RADARS
18th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO-1) Aalborg, Denmark, August 3-7, 1 WHY THE PHASED- OUTPERFORMS THE PHASED-ARRAY AND S Aboulnasr Hassanien and Sergiy A. Vorobyov Dept. of Electrical
More informationDetecting the Number of Transmit Antennas with Unauthorized or Cognitive Receivers in MIMO Systems
Detecting the Number of Transmit Antennas with Unauthorized or Cognitive Receivers in MIMO Systems Oren Somekh, Osvaldo Simeone, Yeheskel Bar-Ness,andWeiSu CWCSPR, Department of Electrical and Computer
More informationMIMO Capacity and Antenna Array Design
1 MIMO Capacity and Antenna Array Design Hervé Ndoumbè Mbonjo Mbonjo 1, Jan Hansen 2, and Volkert Hansen 1 1 Chair of Electromagnetic Theory, University Wuppertal, Fax: +49-202-439-1045, Email: {mbonjo,hansen}@uni-wuppertal.de
More informationPerformance Evaluation of the VBLAST Algorithm in W-CDMA Systems
erformance Evaluation of the VBLAST Algorithm in W-CDMA Systems Dragan Samardzija, eter Wolniansky, Jonathan Ling Wireless Research Laboratory, Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 79 Holmdel-Keyport Road,
More informationUnitary Space Time Modulation for Multiple-Antenna Communications in Rayleigh Flat Fading
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 46, NO. 2, MARCH 2000 543 Unitary Space Time Modulation for Multiple-Antenna Communications in Rayleigh Flat Fading Bertrand M. Hochwald, Member, IEEE, and
More informationMIMO Environmental Capacity Sensitivity
MIMO Environmental Capacity Sensitivity Daniel W. Bliss, Keith W. Forsythe MIT Lincoln Laboratory Lexington, Massachusetts bliss@ll.mit.edu, forsythe@ll.mit.edu Alfred O. Hero University of Michigan Ann
More informationPhd topic: Multistatic Passive Radar: Geometry Optimization
Phd topic: Multistatic Passive Radar: Geometry Optimization Valeria Anastasio (nd year PhD student) Tutor: Prof. Pierfrancesco Lombardo Multistatic passive radar performance in terms of positioning accuracy
More informationSpace-Time Adaptive Processing for Distributed Aperture Radars
Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Distributed Aperture Radars Raviraj S. Adve, Richard A. Schneible, Michael C. Wicks, Robert McMillan Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Eng., University of Toronto, 1 King s College
More informationAsynchronous Space-Time Cooperative Communications in Sensor and Robotic Networks
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Automation Niagara Falls, Canada July 2005 Asynchronous Space-Time Cooperative Communications in Sensor and Robotic Networks Fan Ng, Juite
More informationHIGHLY correlated or coherent signals are often the case
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 45, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 1997 2265 Applications of Cumulants to Array Processing Part IV: Direction Finding in Coherent Signals Case Egemen Gönen, Jerry M. Mendel,
More informationCompact Antenna Spacing in mmwave MIMO Systems Using Random Phase Precoding
Compact Antenna Spacing in mmwave MIMO Systems Using Random Phase Precoding G D Surabhi and A Chockalingam Department of ECE, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 56002 Abstract Presence of strong line
More informationSubspace Adaptive Filtering Techniques for Multi-Sensor. DS-CDMA Interference Suppression in the Presence of a. Frequency-Selective Fading Channel
Subspace Adaptive Filtering Techniques for Multi-Sensor DS-CDMA Interference Suppression in the Presence of a Frequency-Selective Fading Channel Weiping Xu, Michael L. Honig, James R. Zeidler, and Laurence
More informationTime-Delay Estimation From Low-Rate Samples: A Union of Subspaces Approach Kfir Gedalyahu and Yonina C. Eldar, Senior Member, IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 58, NO. 6, JUNE 2010 3017 Time-Delay Estimation From Low-Rate Samples: A Union of Subspaces Approach Kfir Gedalyahu and Yonina C. Eldar, Senior Member, IEEE
More informationA Novel 3D Beamforming Scheme for LTE-Advanced System
A Novel 3D Beamforming Scheme for LTE-Advanced System Yu-Shin Cheng 1, Chih-Hsuan Chen 2 Wireless Communications Lab, Chunghwa Telecom Co, Ltd No 99, Dianyan Rd, Yangmei City, Taoyuan County 32601, Taiwan
More informationSEVERAL diversity techniques have been studied and found
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 52, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2004 1851 A New Base Station Receiver for Increasing Diversity Order in a CDMA Cellular System Wan Choi, Chaehag Yi, Jin Young Kim, and Dong
More informationBER PERFORMANCE AND OPTIMUM TRAINING STRATEGY FOR UNCODED SIMO AND ALAMOUTI SPACE-TIME BLOCK CODES WITH MMSE CHANNEL ESTIMATION
BER PERFORMANCE AND OPTIMUM TRAINING STRATEGY FOR UNCODED SIMO AND ALAMOUTI SPACE-TIME BLOC CODES WITH MMSE CHANNEL ESTIMATION Lennert Jacobs, Frederik Van Cauter, Frederik Simoens and Marc Moeneclaey
More informationIN the recent years ultrawideband (UWB) communication
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 2008 2003 Detection of PPM-UWB Random Signals José A. López-Salcedo, Member, IEEE, and Gregori Vázquez, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract This paper
More informationDIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTIMATION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USING MINIMUM VERIANCE DISTORSIONLESS RESPONSE
DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTIMATION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USING MINIMUM VERIANCE DISTORSIONLESS RESPONSE M. A. Al-Nuaimi, R. M. Shubair, and K. O. Al-Midfa Etisalat University College, P.O.Box:573,
More informationSpace-Time Encoded Secure Chaos Communications with Transmit Beamforming
Space-Time Encoded Secure Chaos Communications with Transmit Beamforming Yuu-Seng Lau, Kevin H. Lin, and Zahir M. Hussain School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria
More informationMultiple Sound Sources Localization Using Energetic Analysis Method
VOL.3, NO.4, DECEMBER 1 Multiple Sound Sources Localization Using Energetic Analysis Method Hasan Khaddour, Jiří Schimmel Department of Telecommunications FEEC, Brno University of Technology Purkyňova
More informationA Hybrid TDOA/RSSD Geolocation System using the Unscented Kalman Filter
A Hybrid TDOA/RSSD Geolocation System using the Unscented Kalman Filter Noha El Gemayel, Holger Jäkel and Friedrich K. Jondral Communications Engineering Lab, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT, Germany
More informationAn SVD Approach for Data Compression in Emitter Location Systems
1 An SVD Approach for Data Compression in Emitter Location Systems Mohammad Pourhomayoun and Mark L. Fowler Abstract In classical TDOA/FDOA emitter location methods, pairs of sensors share the received
More informationAmplitude and Phase Distortions in MIMO and Diversity Systems
Amplitude and Phase Distortions in MIMO and Diversity Systems Christiane Kuhnert, Gerd Saala, Christian Waldschmidt, Werner Wiesbeck Institut für Höchstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik (IHE) Universität
More informationMUSIC for the User Receiver of the GEO Satellite Communication System
2011 International Conference on elecommunication echnology and Applications Proc.of CSI vol.5 (2011) (2011) IACSI Press, Singapore MUSIC for the User Receiver of the GEO Satellite Communication System
More informationEnhancement of Speech Signal Based on Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging and Independent Component Analysis
Enhancement of Speech Signal Based on Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging and Independent Component Analysis Mohini Avatade & S.L. Sahare Electronics & Telecommunication Department, Cummins
More informationBlind Blur Estimation Using Low Rank Approximation of Cepstrum
Blind Blur Estimation Using Low Rank Approximation of Cepstrum Adeel A. Bhutta and Hassan Foroosh School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, 4 Central Florida
More informationDirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA for MIMO Broadcast Channels
1 Dirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA for MIMO Broadcast Channels Nihar Jindal & Andrea Goldsmith Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University njindal, andrea@systems.stanford.edu Submitted to IEEE Trans.
More informationMIMO Nullforming with RVQ Limited Feedback and Channel Estimation Errors
MIMO Nullforming with RVQ Limited Feedback and Channel Estimation Errors D. Richard Brown III Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. Worcester Polytechnic Institute 100 Institute Rd, Worcester, MA 01609
More informationCHAPTER 4 SIGNAL SPACE. Xijun Wang
CHAPTER 4 SIGNAL SPACE Xijun Wang WEEKLY READING 1. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Chapters 5 2. Gallager, Principles of Digital Communication, Chapter 5 2 DIGITAL MODULATION AND DEMODULATION n Digital
More informationAchievable Unified Performance Analysis of Orthogonal Space-Time Block Codes with Antenna Selection over Correlated Rayleigh Fading Channels
Achievable Unified Performance Analysis of Orthogonal Space-Time Block Codes with Antenna Selection over Correlated Rayleigh Fading Channels SUDAKAR SINGH CHAUHAN Electronics and Communication Department
More informationChapter 2: Signal Representation
Chapter 2: Signal Representation Aveek Dutta Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University at Albany Spring 2018 Images and equations adopted from: Digital Communications
More informationPerformance of Closely Spaced Multiple Antennas for Terminal Applications
Performance of Closely Spaced Multiple Antennas for Terminal Applications Anders Derneryd, Jonas Fridén, Patrik Persson, Anders Stjernman Ericsson AB, Ericsson Research SE-417 56 Göteborg, Sweden {anders.derneryd,
More informationCOMBINING GALOIS WITH COMPLEX FIELD CODING FOR HIGH-RATE SPACE-TIME COMMUNICATIONS. Renqiu Wang, Zhengdao Wang, and Georgios B.
COMBINING GALOIS WITH COMPLEX FIELD CODING FOR HIGH-RATE SPACE-TIME COMMUNICATIONS Renqiu Wang, Zhengdao Wang, and Georgios B. Giannakis Dept. of ECE, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA e-mail:
More information