FlexLab and LevLab: A Portable Lab for Dynamics and Control Teaching


 Barrie Lawson
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 FlexLab and LevLab: A Portable Lab for Dynamics and Control Teaching Lei Zhou, Mohammad Imani Nejad, David L. Trumper Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 39, USA Abstract This paper presents the design, modeling and control for an educational lab for control and mechatronics teaching in the department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT. The FlexLab is a system of flexible cantilever beam with permanent magnets attached to it, while the LevLab demonstrates a magnetic suspension system. Both labs are implemented on one printed circuit board, with actuators, sensors, power amplifiers arranged on it. This system works together with myrio from National Instruments. The design file for the system open source on the website of Precision Motion Control Lab at MIT. We would like to share the lab with others who might like to use it in their dynamics and control teaching. Keywords: educational lab, mechatronics, flexible beam, magnetic levitation. Introduction One major challenge in engineering course is offering student the chance of handson experiences, which is essential to obtain a fundamental understanding of phenomenas and design skills. However, in many circumstances, limited lab resources and concentrated lab time for classes may limit the depth of knowledge that student can learn. To address this, instructors for control system at MIT generated the idea of "portable educational labs". We believe that if we can make the lab portable and lend the hardware to student, the student can have chance to play with the system, discover the subtleties outside the structured lab time, and therefore achieve a better understanding of the knowledge. This will requires the educators to design a lowcost, portable, robust system that can demonstrate the intrinsic characteristics that make it applicable to a wide range of educational pursuits. Figure : Photograph of the FlexLab system. This paper introduces the design, modeling and control of the FlexLab/LevLab board, which is one of our our portable educational lab series. The design files of the lab can be downloaded at the website of Precision Motion Control Lab at MIT. The FlexLab is a system of flexible cantilever beam with permanent magnets attached to it, while the LevLab demonstrates a magnetic suspension system. Both labs are implemented on one printed circuit board, with actuators, sensors, power amplifiers arranged on it. This system works together with myrio from National Instruments [].. Hardware configuration Figure shows the hardware configuration of the FlexLab system, which is implemented as one printed circuit board (PCB). This system works together with NI myrio via the standard connector. The same system can be used for magnetic suspension experiment, known as LevLab. Figure shows the magnetic suspension with this system. In the design of the FlexLab, a inch long flexible cantilever beam made out of.5mm thick phosphore bronze sheet is anchored on the PCB. Two pair of disk shape permanent magnets are attached at the middle and at the end of cantilever beam, as shown in Figure. When the tip displacement of the can Preprint submitted to Mechatronics Figure : Photograph of the LevLab experiment November 7, 4
2 +5 V +5 V R m C m 8 V ref +  R R Coil R s +  R 4 R 3 V ref sum of sensor output(v) measured fitted V in Figure 3: Circuit diagram of the coil power amplifiers. The op amps are the power amplifiers. Here V re f is V. V re f is.5 V. Controlling signal in injected at V in. The amplifier gain is selected to be 4. Therefore R = 4R, and R 3 = R 4. R s is the sensing resistor for current measurement. R m and C m are placed for stability. In our design R m = Ω, and C m =. µf gap(mm) Figure 4: Calibration data of the hall effect sensors for position measurement. tilever is small, this system presents a linear, lightly damped massspring system. A complete electromechanical feedback system is built around this cantilever beam system, all integrated on the PCB. The controller for the system is implemented in the NI myrio. On the PCB, two spiral coils are embedded in the PCB via routing. Each coil has 3 turns, with 4 layers in total and 8 turns per layer. By driving current through the coils, a force can be generated to the cantilever beam through the interaction between the actuating current and the magnetic field from the permanent magnet. The coils are driven by linear power operational amplifiers to get rid of switching noise. In our design, TCA37 from ON semiconductor [] is selected to drive the coils. In order to make better use of the power supply from the NI myrio, single side power supply (  5V) is selected for the power operational amplifiers. The power amplifiers are differentially configured to provide the coil with both positive and negative currents. Figure 3 shows a circuit diagram of the coil power amplifier. Here the controlling signal is injected at V in, which is generated by the D/A converter of the myrio. The amplifier gain is selected to be 4. Therefore R = 4R, and R 3 = R 4. R s is the sensing resistor for current measurement. R m and C m are placed for stability. In our design R m = Ω, and C m =. µf. Two hall effect sensors are configured at both sides of every magnet on the beam to measure the position of the permanent magnet, which is also the local displacement of the cantilever beam. The signals from the two hall effect sensors around one magnet are added together and goes into the A/D converter of the myrio. The controller for the system is implemented digitally in the myrio. Figure 4 shows the calibration data of the hall sensors, with its xaxis being the vertical position of the magnet (gap between the PCB board and the magnet) while its yaxis is the sensor output. Data shows the position measurement by the hall sensors is approximately linear. The same system can be used for magnetic suspension experiment. If we take off the flexible beam, and correctly design the controller for the system, a spherical permanent magnet can be Figure 5: Principle of magnetic force generation. magnetically levitated underneath the coil in PCB. We call this system LevLab, as is shown in figure. 3. Modeling and system identification In this section the modeling and system identification for both FlexLab and LevLab systems are introduced. Here lists the assumptions that our model is based on: The motion of the permanent magnets have only one degree of freedom; Hall effect sensors and voltage control power amplifiers are linear and have no dynamics; Small deviation from the operating point is assumed; Inductance of the coil is small. 3.. Electromechanical interaction and the force generation In order to model the dynamics of the system, we first need the expression for the magnetic force that the coil applies to the magnet. This force is Lorentz force that generated by the field from magnet and the current in the coil. Figure 5 shows the principle of the magnetic force generation. In Figure 5, the permanent magnet field is modeled as a dipole pattern. When a current i is flowing in the coil, a Lorentz
3 force is generated to the coil. The Lorentz force can be calculated by F = J B, therefore the force in the horizontal plane is generated by the vertical component of the magnetic flux B x, while the force in the vertical direction is generated by the horizontal component of the magnetic flux. The Lorentz forces in the horizontal direction are canceled due to symmetry, as a result, the total force that the magnet applies to coil is in the vertical direction. We can get the form of the magnetic force as: f magnetic = C i. () Here the C is a constant that is determined by the strength of magnet, the number of turns of the coil and the geometry. x is the distance between the coil and the permanent magnet. We will use this expression for the magnetic force in the modeling for both FlexLab and LevLab systems. 3.. LevLab modeling and system identification In this section the modeling and identification of the LevLab system is presented. In this electromagnetic system, energy is transfered from electrical domain to mechanical domain. Figure 6 shows a diagram of the magnetic levitation system. equation, we define the following constants: K i = C [N/A] : Force constant x (5a) K s = C i [N/m] : Negative sti f f ness x (5b) 3 By substituting these constants and removing the variation sign δ we reached the dynamic equation for the magnet s movement is mẍ = K i i + K s x. (6) Notice that here the x and i represents the small variations from the operating point. For the electrical domain, the mechanical system influence the electrical domain via back emf of v em f = K i ẋ. Here the constant K i is the force constant shown in Equation (6). Since the inductance of the coil is very small, the electrical dynamics is much faster than that of mechanical domain. Therefore it is reasonable for us to ignore the dynamics of the circuit by assuming the inductance value L =. According to the Kirchhoff s circuit law, the equation for the circuit can be written as: e K i ẋ = ir. (7) Substituting Equation (7) into Equation (6), the equation for the system can be achieved: Figure 6: Diagram for DOF magnetic levitation. In the mechanical domain, the dynamics of the levitated permanent magnet is: mẍ = mg f magnetic. () Note that here positive direction of x is pointing down, which corresponds to increasing the distance between the magnet and the coil. By substituting the expression for magnetic force, we reached the dynamic equation for the magnet: mẍ = K s x + K i ( e R K i ẋ) (8) R Choosing state variables = x and = ẋ, the input signal to the power amplifier to be the control input u, and the output signal of the hall effect displacement sensors to be the system output y. We can rewrite (8) into a state space representation as: = K s m K i mr y = [ g sensor + ] g amp K i mr u (9) () Using Laplace transformation we can reach the transfer function of the system: mẍ = mg C i. (3) Linearizing this equation about operating point x and i and we reached the linear differential equation: mδx = mg C i x C x δi + C i δx. (4) x 3 The constant part of the magnetic force is balanced with the magnet s weight, which is mg = C i x. In order to simplify the 3 K i mr Y(s) U(s) = g sensorg amp s + K i mr s K s m () Here g amp [V/V] is the gain of the power amplifier, while g sensor [V/m] is the gain of the hall effect displacement sensor. The LevLab system parameters are being identified by measuring the system dynamics. Table presents the design parameters of the LevLab system. Figure 7 shows the experimentally measured and fitted Bode plot of the LevLab plant plotting together, with the signal to the power amplifier being the input,
4 Table : Design parameters of the LevLab system st mode Magnet mass m.5 [kg] Power amplifier gain g amp Hall effect displacement sensor gain g sensor.5 [V/V].8 [V/mm] i i st mode Resistance of the coil R 6 [Ω] Figure 8: FlexLab system and mode shape. Magnitude Measured Model Figure 7: Measured and modeled plant bode plot of the LevLab. b F k k m m b Figure 9: Massspring model of the FlexLab system. Based on Figure 9, the differential equations of the system dynamics can be written as: m x = F k b + k ( ) + b ( ) m x = F k ( ) b ( ) F (3a) (3b) and taking the sensor signal as the output. Notice that this Bode measurement is taken with the system under closedloop control, since the system is inherently unstable. The fitted transfer function is: Y(s) U(s) =.68 (s + 6)(s 6). () By substituting values in Table into Equation () and comparing it with (), we can calculate that K s = 5.34 [N/m], and K i =. [N/A]. Therefore we can calculate the electrical damping value as b e = K i mr =.53 [Ns/m] FlexLab modeling and system identification This section introduces the modeling and identification of the FlexLab system. The FlexLab system uses the same PCB with the LevLab. In our control teaching labs, the FlexLab system can use only one set of magnets arranged on the tip of the cantilever to demonstrate a lightly damped nd order system, and the coil in the middle can be used to add disturbance to the system. The FlexLab system can also work with two sets of magnets, which can let the students to explore the complete vibration dynamics of the system. Here we present the modeling and the identification of the complete system dynamics of the FlexLab system. Figure 8 shows a diagram of the FlexLab system. Here the two coils are driven with currents i and i respectively, and magnetic forces are generated between the coils and the magnets that introduced in Section 3.. When driving the system into resonances, the system will present different mode shapes. A fourthorder massspringdamper model is being used to model the FlexLab system. Figure 9 shows the linear system. 4 Here the forces F and F are the forces the coils acting on the magnet. The calculation of these magnetic forces is discussed in Section 3.. By linearizing these force about an operating point as discussed in Section 3., the forces can be expressed to be linear with the supplied voltage to the power amplifier, with a coefficient of K i g amp /R. Define the input voltages of the two coils to be u and u, and selecting state variables x = [ ] T, the system can be written in the state space form, as: d dt = y y k +k m b +b m k m b m k b m m k m b m m + m = g sensor g sensor K i g amp R u K i g amp R u (4) (5)
5 Magnitude Magnitude Model Measured 4 Model Measured Figure : Bode plot of the FlexLab system /u. Figure : Bode plot of the FlexLab system /u. Magnitude permanent magnets on the beam. In this mode, the system demonstrates a nd order system after linearization. A step response of the system is shown in Figure 3. It is shown that this system is very lightly damped inherently. The system demonstrated a natural frequency of 38 rad/s ( Hz) and a damping ratio of ζ = Model Measured response(v).5 Figure : Bode plot of the FlexLab system /u. Note that in Equation (4) the stiffness values are the sum of mechanical stiffness of the cantilever beam and the negative stiffness between the magnet and the coil, while the damping values are a combination of both air drag damping and electrical damping due to back emf. The identification of the parameters for the FlexLab is similar to that for the LevLab, except that this is a twoinputtwooutput system. Figure through Figure present the experimentally measured and modeled Bode plot for the FlexLab system, with different input and output selection. We can see that the system zeros are appearing in the collocated measurement, and have no zero in noncollocated measurement. By matching the pole and zero positions to the measured Bode plot, we identified the system parameters as m =.3 kg, m =.4 kg, k = 8 N/m, k = 9 N/m, b =.5 Ns/m, b =. Ns/m. The modeled Bode plot of the system with these identified values are plotted in blue in Figure through Figure. Good match between the model and the measured data confirms our modeling. The FlexLab system can also operate with only one pair of time(s) Figure 3: Step response of the FlexLab system with tip magnet only. 4. System control design When operating, the FlexLab and LevLab system need to operate under closed loop control to be stable and achieve better performance. The feedback control system design and analysis are discussed in this section. 4.. Stabilization of the LevLab In this section the control for the magnetic suspension for the LevLab system is introduced. As discussed in Section 3., there is one right plane pole in the plant transfer function of the LevLab system, which makes the system unstable in openloop. As a result, feedback control is needed to stabilize it. The controller s design for the LevLab is based on the Lev Lab plant dynamics, which is depicted in Figure 7. In our design, series compensation to stabilize this magnetic suspension
6 Magnitude Magnutude Plant Controller Loop Return Ratio 3 4 Plant Loop without notch Loop return ratio controller Figure 4: Bode plot of loop shaping control design for the LevLab system. Figure 5: Bode plot of loop shaping control design for the FlexLab system. system. This is the approach that is generally used in practice as it only assumes the measurement of the magnet s vertical position. Leadlag form of the PID controller is used for both stabilization and providing better disturbance rejection ability. The controller form is selected to be: G c (s) = K p ( + T i s )ατs + τs + (6) For the LevLab system, the lead network is chosen to have a polezero separation factor α =. The loop is designed to cross over at rad/s, thus we can calculate the lead time constant τ =.6 s to place the phase maximum at the desired crossover frequency. The integral gain for the system /T i is chosen to be 4 rad/s. Figure 4 shows a Bode plot of the loop shaping control design for the LevLab system. As a result, the system can reach a 35 Hz ( rad/s) crossover frequency with a 4 o phase margin. 4.. Position control of FlexLab In Section 3.3 we identified the system dynamics of the FlexLab, where we can see that the system has very lightly damped resonances. To better control the position of the magnet on the cantilever beam, feedback control is needed to add active damping to the system. In this experiment, the actuator at the tip of the cantilever is being used as the control input, while the actuator in the middle can be used to inject disturbance. A lead compensator is used to add damping to this position control system. In order to crossover at a higher frequency, a notch filter is used to suppress the second resonance and maintain stability. The Bode plot of the plant, controller, and the corresponding loop return ratio is shown in Figure 5. The plot shows that the notch of the controller can effectively hit down the notch in the plant. With the designed controller, a crossover frequency of 5 Hz is reached, with a phase margin of 4 degrees. Figure 6 shows a closedloop step response of the magnet position and the corresponding control effort signal of the FlexLab system. 6 Closed loop response(v) Control Effort(V) time(s) time(s) Figure 6: Bode plot of loop shaping control design for the FlexLab system Selfresonance control for FlexLab The FlexLab system can also be used to demonstrate selfresonance control, which is an important building block for a taping mode atomic force microscope probe [3]. Here let us consider the FlexLab with only the magnets on the cantilever tip, which makes the system a secondorder system after linearization. By selfresonance control we can regulate the system at its selfresonance and control its oscillation amplitude. The details of the selfresonance control is introduced in [4]. For a secondorder linear system with poles at σ ± jω n, the system will have a response as y(t) = Ae σt sin(ω n t + φ). (7) Ideally, when the real part of the system poles become, the system is marginally stable, and will demonstrate sustain oscillation. However, in practice, it is not possible to set the real part of the pols to exactly and make a perfect marginally stable system. The closedloop poles will eventually have a positive or negative real part, and the closedloop system will become either stable or unstable. To make the cantilever beam in the
7 Figure 7: Block diagram of FlexLab selfresonance amplitude control. FlexLab a pure oscillator, a closedloop amplitude controller, which measures the oscillation amplitude and adds positive or negative damping to the system to control the amplitude of the self resonance. With one pair of magnets attached to the cantilever tip, the natural frequency of the system is measured to be ω n = 38 rad/s ( Hz). It is possible to show that the oscillation amplitude envelope of the FlexLab changes as A(t) = A e ζω nt. (8) Here A is the initial amplitude of the oscillation, and ζ is the system damping ratio. Although the relationship between A and ζ is nonlinear, we can linearize it around a set point and apply linear control theory to design the controller for the oscillation amplitude control. A firstorder Taylor series linear approximation of Equation (8) about t = yields A(t) = A A ζω n t. (9) With the oscillation frequency fixed at ω n, the oscillator dynamics with the oscillation amplitude change A being the output and the damping ratio ζ being the input can be reached by applying a Laplace transform to Equation (9): Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/s) Plant Controller Loop return ratio Figure 8: Bode plot for FlexLab oscillation amplitude control design. In the control loop shown in Figure 7, the dynamics from ζ to A can be modeled as a transfer function () with a lowpass filter, where the lowpass filter represents the dynamics of the amplitude estimation functions. In our implementation the filter is designed as A(s) ζ(s) = A ω n. () s The above transfer function shows that the incremental change in the envelope of oscillation A(s) is proportional to the integral of the damping ratio ζ. We can design a controller to control the oscillation amplitude of the FlexLab system in real time based on the plant transfer function in (). Figure 7 shows a block diagram of the control system implementation. The oscillatory magnet position signal is measured by the hall effect sensors and being acquired into the embedded controller (NI myrio) via A/D conversion. A absolute value function (rectifier) and a lowpass filter is used for the measured signal to get an estimation of the envelope amplitude of the oscillation signal. The amplitude signal A is then compared with a reference amplitude A re f, and the error goes through the controller and generated the control effort signal ζ, which is the controlling damping ratio (positive or negative) added to the system. The damping signal is generated by multiplying ω n and taking derivative to the signal (added another pole for filtering), and injected to the FlexLab system. 7 LPF(s) = s/ +. () The reference amplitude of oscillation is set as A r e f = A = V. Figure 8 shows the Bode plot for the oscillation amplitude controller design. Here the plant transfer function demonstrate the dynamics from control effort ζ to amplitude estimation Â. Note that the minus sign in Equation () is reversed for design purpose. A PI controller with a form of C(s) = K p ( + /T i s) is selected for the system. By targeting at a crossover frequency at ω = rad/s and a phase margin of 4 o, the controller parameters are selected as K p =.35 and T i =.. The control loop shown in Figure?? is implemented on the FlexLab system with myrio controller. Figure 9 shows a waveform of the system output under selfresonance amplitude control under step changes of the reference amplitude A re f, and Figure and shows the corresponding envelope amplitude estimation and the control effort signal ζ. Note that the signals are asymmetric due to the nonlinearity, with the plant transfer function () depend on the current amplitude A.
8 response(v) system analysis and control at MIT. We have attempted to describe this system and its related experiments in sufficiently detail so that it can be readily duplicated by others who might like to use it in their control teaching efforts. The design file of the system is available to be download at the website of Precision Motion Control Lab at MIT. We welcome comments, questions, or suggestions for improvement of this lab design and exercise time(s) 6. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank National Instruments for funding this project. Figure 9: Waveform of FlexLab selfresonance amplitude control. Envelope amplitude(v) References. NI myrio Hardware at a Glance. Tech. Rep.; National Instruments; 4.. On semiconductors.. A Output Current, Dual Power Operational Amplifiers. TCA37 Datasheet; Trumper DL, Hocken RJ, AminShahidi D, Ljubicic D, Overcash J. Highaccuracy atomic force microscope. In: Control Technologies for Emerging Micro and Nanoscale Systems. Springer; : Roberge JK. Operational amplifiers. Wiley; Time(s) Figure : Amplitude signal of FlexLab selfresonance amplitude control Control effort ζ Time(s) Figure : Control effort signal ( ζ) of FlexLab selfresonance amplitude control. Here ζ = ζ + ζ, where ζ is the system damping ratio, ζ is the controlling damping ratio added through control, and ζ is the total damping ratio. 5. Conclusion In this paper, a compact mechatronics system that can work as either a flexible cantilever beam or a magnetic levitation system is reported. This system will be used in teaching feedback 8
Magnetic Levitation System
Magnetic Levitation System Electromagnet Infrared LED Phototransistor Levitated Ball Magnetic Levitation System K. Craig 1 Magnetic Levitation System Electromagnet Emitter Infrared LED i Detector Phototransistor
More informationElectronics and Instrumentation Name ENGR4220 Fall 1999 Section Modeling the Cantilever Beam Supplemental Info for Project 1.
Name ENGR40 Fall 1999 Section Modeling the Cantilever Beam Supplemental Info for Project 1 The cantilever beam has a simple equation of motion. If we assume that the mass is located at the end of the
More informationMAGNETIC LEVITATION SUSPENSION CONTROL SYSTEM FOR REACTION WHEEL
IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology (IMPACT: IJRET) ISSN 23218843 Vol. 1, Issue 4, Sep 2013, 16 Impact Journals MAGNETIC LEVITATION SUSPENSION CONTROL SYSTEM FOR REACTION
More informationLab 11. Speed Control of a D.C. motor. Motor Characterization
Lab 11. Speed Control of a D.C. motor Motor Characterization Motor Speed Control Project 1. Generate PWM waveform 2. Amplify the waveform to drive the motor 3. Measure motor speed 4. Estimate motor parameters
More informationDesign and Implementation of the Control System for a 2 khz Rotary Fast Tool Servo
Design and Implementation of the Control System for a 2 khz Rotary Fast Tool Servo Richard C. Montesanti a,b, David L. Trumper b a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA b Massachusetts
More informationAddendum Handout for the ECE3510 Project. The magnetic levitation system that is provided for this lab is a nonlinear system.
Addendum Handout for the ECE3510 Project The magnetic levitation system that is provided for this lab is a nonlinear system. Because of this fact, it should be noted that the associated ideal linear responses
More informationFLASH rf gun. beam generated within the (1.3 GHz) RF gun by a laser. filling time: typical 55 μs. flat top time: up to 800 μs
The gun RF control at FLASH (and PITZ) Elmar Vogel in collaboration with Waldemar Koprek and Piotr Pucyk th FLASH Seminar at December 19 2006 FLASH rf gun beam generated within the (1.3 GHz) RF gun by
More informationConventional geophone topologies and their intrinsic physical limitations, determined
Magnetic innovation in velocity sensing Low frequency with passive Conventional geophone topologies and their intrinsic physical limitations, determined by the mechanical construction, limit their velocity
More informationME 365 FINAL EXAM. Monday, April 29, :30 pm5:30 pm LILY Problem Score
Name: SOLUTION Section: 8:30_Chang 11:30_Meckl ME 365 FINAL EXAM Monday, April 29, 2013 3:30 pm5:30 pm LILY 1105 Problem Score Problem Score Problem Score Problem Score Problem Score 1 5 9 13 17 2 6 10
More informationMechatronics. Analog and Digital Electronics: Studio Exercises 1 & 2
Mechatronics Analog and Digital Electronics: Studio Exercises 1 & 2 There is an electronics revolution taking place in the industrialized world. Electronics pervades all activities. Perhaps the most important
More informationPart 2: Second order systems: cantilever response
 cantilever response slide 1 Part 2: Second order systems: cantilever response Goals: Understand the behavior and how to characterize second order measurement systems Learn how to operate: function generator,
More informationLecture 9. Lab 16 System Identification (2 nd or 2 sessions) Lab 17 Proportional Control
246 Lecture 9 Coming week labs: Lab 16 System Identification (2 nd or 2 sessions) Lab 17 Proportional Control Today: Systems topics System identification (ala ME4232) Time domain Frequency domain Proportional
More informationMTE 360 Automatic Control Systems University of Waterloo, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering
MTE 36 Automatic Control Systems University of Waterloo, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering Laboratory #1: Introduction to Control Engineering In this laboratory, you will become familiar
More informationTRACKFOLLOWING CONTROLLER FOR HARD DISK DRIVE ACTUATOR USING QUANTITATIVE FEEDBACK THEORY
Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference Modelling, Identification and Control (AsiaMIC 2013) April 1012, 2013 Phuket, Thailand TRACKFOLLOWING CONTROLLER FOR HARD DISK DRIVE ACTUATOR USING
More informationCHAPTER 6 INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
CHAPTER 6 INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Broadly speaking, system identification is the art and science of using measurements obtained from a system to characterize the system. The characterization
More informationEE 3TP4: Signals and Systems Lab 5: Control of a Servomechanism
EE 3TP4: Signals and Systems Lab 5: Control of a Servomechanism Tim Davidson Ext. 27352 davidson@mcmaster.ca Objective To identify the plant model of a servomechanism, and explore the tradeoff between
More informationThe Principle and Simulation of Movingcoil Velocity Detector. Yonghui ZHAO, Liming WANG and Xiaoling YAN
17 nd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics: Techniques and Applications (EETA 17) ISBN: 978165954165 The Principle and Simulation of Movingcoil Velocity Detector Yonghui ZHAO, Liming
More informationLaboratory PID Tuning Based On Frequency Response Analysis. 2. be able to evaluate system performance for empirical tuning method;
Laboratory PID Tuning Based On Frequency Response Analysis Objectives: At the end, student should 1. appreciate a systematic way of tuning PID loop by the use of process frequency response analysis; 2.
More informationActive Vibration Isolation of an Unbalanced Machine Tool Spindle
Active Vibration Isolation of an Unbalanced Machine Tool Spindle David. J. Hopkins, Paul Geraghty Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave, MS/L792, Livermore, CA. 94550 Abstract Proper configurations
More informationDC SERVO MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM
DC SERVO MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM MODEL NO:(PEC  00CE) User Manual Version 2.0 Technical Clarification /Suggestion : / Technical Support Division, Vi Microsystems Pvt. Ltd., Plot No :75,Electronics Estate,
More informationAndrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear control systems design
Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear control systems design Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 2 The control problem Let s introduce
More informationLoop Design. Chapter Introduction
Chapter 8 Loop Design 8.1 Introduction This is the first Chapter that deals with design and we will therefore start by some general aspects on design of engineering systems. Design is complicated because
More informationFree vibration of cantilever beam FREE VIBRATION OF CANTILEVER BEAM PROCEDURE
FREE VIBRATION OF CANTILEVER BEAM PROCEDURE AIM Determine the damped natural frequency, logarithmic decrement and damping ratio of a given system from the free vibration response Calculate the mass of
More informationCorrection for Synchronization Errors in Dynamic Measurements
Correction for Synchronization Errors in Dynamic Measurements Vasishta Ganguly and Tony L. Schmitz Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science University of North Carolina at Charlotte
More informationTesting and Stabilizing Feedback Loops in Today s Power Supplies
Keywords Venable, frequency response analyzer, impedance, injection transformer, oscillator, feedback loop, Bode Plot, power supply design, open loop transfer function, voltage loop gain, error amplifier,
More informationPenn State Erie, The Behrend College School of Engineering
Penn State Erie, The Behrend College School of Engineering EE BD 327 Signals and Control Lab Spring 2008 Lab 9 Ball and Beam Balancing Problem April 10, 17, 24, 2008 Due: May 1, 2008 Number of Lab Periods:
More informationApplications of Passivity Theory to the Active Control of Acoustic Musical Instruments
Applications of Passivity Theory to the Active Control of Acoustic Musical Instruments Edgar Berdahl, Günter Niemeyer, and Julius O. Smith III Acoustics 08 Conference, Paris, France June 29thJuly 4th,
More informationME451: Control Systems. Course roadmap
ME451: Control Systems Lecture 20 Root locus: Lead compensator design Dr. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Fall 2008 1 Modeling Course roadmap Analysis Design
More informationRESIT EXAM: WAVES and ELECTROMAGNETISM (AE1240II) 10 August 2015, 14:00 17:00 9 pages
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering RESIT EXAM: WAVES and ELECTROMAGNETISM (AE140II) 10 August 015, 14:00 17:00 9 pages Please read these instructions first: 1) This exam contains 5 fourchoice questions.
More informationNew Long Stroke Vibration Shaker Design using Linear Motor Technology
New Long Stroke Vibration Shaker Design using Linear Motor Technology The Modal Shop, Inc. A PCB Group Company Patrick Timmons Calibration Systems Engineer Mark Schiefer Senior Scientist Long Stroke Shaker
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 81 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationModeling and Control of Mold Oscillation
ANNUAL REPORT UIUC, August 8, Modeling and Control of Mold Oscillation Vivek Natarajan (Ph.D. Student), Joseph Bentsman Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
More informationExercise 9: inductorresistorcapacitor (LRC) circuits
Exercise 9: inductorresistorcapacitor (LRC) circuits Purpose: to study the relationship of the phase and resonance on capacitor and inductor reactance in a circuit driven by an AC signal. Introduction
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the splane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationA RealTime Platform for Teaching Power System Control Design
A RealTime Platform for Teaching Power System Control Design G. Jackson, U.D. Annakkage, A. M. Gole, D. Lowe, and M.P. McShane Abstract This paper describes the development of a realtime digital simulation
More informationControl Servo Design for Inverted Pendulum
JGWT1402132v2 Jan. 14, 2014 Control Servo Design for Inverted Pendulum Takanori Sekiguchi 1. Introduction In order to acquire and keep the lock of the interferometer, RMS displacement or velocity of
More informationHomework Assignment 13
Question 1 Short Takes 2 points each. Homework Assignment 13 1. Classify the type of feedback uses in the circuit below (i.e., shuntshunt, seriesshunt, ) Answer: Seriesshunt. 2. True or false: an engineer
More informationTesting and Stabilizing Feedback Loops in Today's Power Supplies
VENABLE TECHNICAL PAPER # 17 Testing and Stabilizing Feedback Loops in Today's Power Supplies Abstract: Feedback loops aren't what they used to be. Here are some practical tips for dealing with the problems
More informationPoles and Zeros of H(s), Analog Computers and Active Filters
Poles and Zeros of H(s), Analog Computers and Active Filters Physics116A, Draft10/28/09 D. Pellett LRC Filter Poles and Zeros Pole structure same for all three functions (two poles) HR has two poles and
More informationACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF HARDDISK DRIVES USING PZT ACTUATED SUSPENSION SYSTEMS. MengShiun Tsai, WeiHsiung Yuan and JiaMing Chang
ICSV14 Cairns Australia 912 July, 27 ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF HARDDISK DRIVES USING PZT ACTUATED SUSPENSION SYSTEMS Abstract MengShiun Tsai, WeiHsiung Yuan and JiaMing Chang Department of Mechanical
More informationCharacterizing the Frequency Response of a Damped, Forced TwoMass Mechanical Oscillator
Characterizing the Frequency Response of a Damped, Forced TwoMass Mechanical Oscillator Shanel Wu Harvey Mudd College 3 November 013 Abstract A twomass oscillator was constructed using two carts, springs,
More informationLaboratory Assignment 5 Digital Velocity and Position control of a D.C. motor
Laboratory Assignment 5 Digital Velocity and Position control of a D.C. motor 2.737 Mechatronics Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA0239 Topics Motor modeling
More information1. Introduction. 2. Concept. reflector. transduce r. node. Kraftmessung an verschiedenen Fluiden in akustischen Feldern
1. Introduction The aim of this Praktikum is to familiarize with the concept and the equipment of acoustic levitation and to measure the forces exerted by an acoustic field on small spherical objects.
More informationFigure 1: Unity Feedback System. The transfer function of the PID controller looks like the following:
Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Electrical Engineering department Control Systems Design Lab Eng. Mohammed S. Jouda Eng. Ola M. Skeik Experiment 3 PID Controller Overview This experiment
More informationDynamic Generation of DC Displacement AN 13
Dynamic Generation of DC Displacement AN 13 Application Note to the R&D SYSTEM Nonlinearities inherent in the transducer produce a DC component in the voice coil displacement by rectifying the AC signal.
More informationVibration Cancellation Using Synthetic Shunt Impedances
Vibration Cancellation Using Synthetic Shunt Impedances S.S. Groothuis, R.J. Roesthuis MSc. Internship Thesis February 21 Supervisors: A/Prof. K. Sammut A/Prof. F. He Abstract The goal of this project
More informationCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Department of Applied Engineering & Technology Electrical Engineering Technology
California University of Pennsylvania Department of Applied Engineering & Technology Electrical Engineering Technology < Use as a guide Do not copy and paste> EET 410 Design of Feedback Control Systems
More informationRotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #03: Speed Control. SRV02 Speed Control using QuaRC. Student Manual
Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02 Rotary Experiment #03: Speed Control SRV02 Speed Control using QuaRC Student Manual Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. PREREQUISITES...1 3. OVERVIEW OF FILES...2
More informationNonCollocation Problems in Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU ETD Archive 2009 NonCollocation Problems in Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems Timothy M. Obrzut Cleveland State University How does access to
More informationPosition Control of DC Motor by Compensating Strategies
Position Control of DC Motor by Compensating Strategies S Prem Kumar 1 J V Pavan Chand 1 B Pangedaiah 1 1. Assistant professor of Laki Reddy Balireddy College Of Engineering, Mylavaram Abstract  As the
More informationCHASSIS DYNAMOMETER TORQUE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN BY DIRECT INVERSE COMPENSATION. C.Matthews, P.Dickinson, A.T.Shenton
CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER TORQUE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN BY DIRECT INVERSE COMPENSATION C.Matthews, P.Dickinson, A.T.Shenton Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK Abstract:
More informationEES42042 Fundamental of Control Systems Bode Plots
EES42042 Fundamental of Control Systems Bode Plots DR. Ir. Wahidin Wahab M.Sc. Ir. Aries Subiantoro M.Sc. 2 Bode Plots Plot of db Gain and phase vs frequency It is assumed you know how to construct Bode
More informationKaradeniz Technical University Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Trabzon, Turkey
Karadeniz Technical University Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 61080 Trabzon, Turkey Chapter 32 1 Modelling and Representation of Physical Systems 3.1. Electrical Systems Bu ders
More informationEnergy efficient active vibration control strategies using electromagnetic linear actuators
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Energy efficient active vibration control strategies using electromagnetic linear actuators To cite this article: Angel TorresPerez et al 2018 J.
More information레이저의주파수안정화방법및그응용 박상언 ( 한국표준과학연구원, 길이시간센터 )
레이저의주파수안정화방법및그응용 박상언 ( 한국표준과학연구원, 길이시간센터 ) Contents Frequency references Frequency locking methods Basic principle of loop filter Example of lock box circuits Quantifying frequency stability Applications
More informationAndrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Winter Semester, Linear control systems design Part 1
Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Winter Semester, 2018 Linear control systems design Part 1 Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 2 Step responses Assume
More informationGoals. Introduction. To understand the use of root mean square (rms) voltages and currents.
Lab 10. AC Circuits Goals To show that AC voltages cannot generally be added without accounting for their phase relationships. That is, one must account for how they vary in time with respect to one another.
More informationGoals. Introduction. To understand the use of root mean square (rms) voltages and currents.
Lab 10. AC Circuits Goals To show that AC voltages cannot generally be added without accounting for their phase relationships. That is, one must account for how they vary in time with respect to one another.
More informationAdvanced Motion Control Optimizes Laser MicroDrilling
Advanced Motion Control Optimizes Laser MicroDrilling The following discussion will focus on how to implement advanced motion control technology to improve the performance of laser microdrilling machines.
More informationEEL2216 Control Theory CT2: Frequency Response Analysis
EEL2216 Control Theory CT2: Frequency Response Analysis 1. Objectives (i) To analyse the frequency response of a system using Bode plot. (ii) To design a suitable controller to meet frequency domain and
More informationA study of Vibration Analysis for Gearbox Casing Using Finite Element Analysis
A study of Vibration Analysis for Gearbox Casing Using Finite Element Analysis M. Sofian D. Hazry K. Saifullah M. Tasyrif K.Salleh I.Ishak Autonomous System and Machine Vision Laboratory, School of Mechatronic,
More informationStudy on Repetitive PID Control of Linear Motor in Wafer Stage of Lithography
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 9 (01) 3863 3867 01 International Workshop on Information and Electronics Engineering (IWIEE) Study on Repetitive PID Control of Linear Motor
More informationHighspeed wavefront control using MEMS micromirrors T. G. Bifano and J. B. Stewart, Boston University [ ] Introduction
Highspeed wavefront control using MEMS micromirrors T. G. Bifano and J. B. Stewart, Boston University [589527] Introduction Various deformable mirrors for highspeed wavefront control have been demonstrated
More informationA SIMPLE FORCE BALANCE ACCELEROMETER/SEISMOMETER BASED ON A TUNING FORK DISPLACEMENT SENSOR. D. StuartWatson and J. Tapson
A SIMPLE FORCE BALANCE ACCELEROMETER/SEISMOMETER BASED ON A TUNING FORK DISPLACEMENT SENSOR D. StuartWatson and J. Tapson Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701,
More informationRotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #02: Position Control. SRV02 Position Control using QuaRC. Student Manual
Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02 Rotary Experiment #02: Position Control SRV02 Position Control using QuaRC Student Manual Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. PREREQUISITES...1 3. OVERVIEW OF FILES...2
More informationDifferential Amplifier : input. resistance. Differential amplifiers are widely used in engineering instrumentation
Differential Amplifier : input resistance Differential amplifiers are widely used in engineering instrumentation Differential Amplifier : input resistance v 2 v 1 ir 1 ir 1 2iR 1 R in v 2 i v 1 2R 1 Differential
More informationA Machine Tool Controller using Cascaded Servo Loops and Multiple Feedback Sensors per Axis
A Machine Tool Controller using Cascaded Servo Loops and Multiple Sensors per Axis David J. Hopkins, Timm A. Wulff, George F. Weinert Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave, L792, Livermore,
More informationDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. MAE334  Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers. Final Examination.
Name: Number: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering MAE334  Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers Final Examination December 12, 2003 Closed Book and Notes 1. Be sure to fill in your
More informationClassical Control Design Guidelines & Tools (L10.2) Transfer Functions
Classical Control Design Guidelines & Tools (L10.2) Douglas G. MacMartin Summarize frequency domain control design guidelines and approach Dec 4, 2013 D. G. MacMartin CDS 110a, 2013 1 Transfer Functions
More informationBall Balancing on a Beam
1 Ball Balancing on a Beam Muhammad Hasan Jafry, Haseeb Tariq, Abubakr Muhammad Department of Electrical Engineering, LUMS School of Science and Engineering, Pakistan Email: {14100105,14100040}@lums.edu.pk,
More informationResearch and design of PFC control based on DSP
Acta Technica 61, No. 4B/2016, 153 164 c 2017 Institute of Thermomechanics CAS, v.v.i. Research and design of PFC control based on DSP Ma Yuli 1, Ma Yushan 1 Abstract. A realization scheme of singlephase
More informationEECS40 RLC Lab guide
EECS40 RLC Lab guide Introduction SecondOrder Circuits Second order circuits have both inductor and capacitor components, which produce one or more resonant frequencies, ω0. In general, a differential
More informationCourse Outline. Time vs. Freq. Domain Analysis. Frequency Response. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Design via Frequency Response
Course Outline Amme 35 : System Dynamics & Control Design via Frequency Response Week Date Content Assignment Notes Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 5 Mar Transient Performance and
More informationThursday, 1/23/19 Automatic Gain Control As previously shown, 1 0 is a nonlinear system that produces a limit cycle with a distorted sinusoid for
Thursday, 1/23/19 Automatic Gain Control As previously shown, 1 0 is a nonlinear system that produces a limit cycle with a distorted sinusoid for x(t), which is not a very good sinusoidal oscillator. A
More informationLast Name Girosco Given Name Pio ID Number
Last Name Girosco Given Name Pio ID Number 0170130 Question n. 1 Which is the typical range of frequencies at which MEMS gyroscopes (as studied during the course) operate, and why? In case of modesplit
More informationANNA UNIVERSITY :: CHENNAI MODEL QUESTION PAPER(VSEMESTER) B.E. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING EC334  CONTROL SYSTEMS
ANNA UNIVERSITY :: CHENNAI  600 025 MODEL QUESTION PAPER(VSEMESTER) B.E. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING EC334  CONTROL SYSTEMS Time: 3hrs Max Marks: 100 Answer all Questions PART  A (10
More informationDEEP FLAW DETECTION WITH GIANT MAGNETORESISTIVE (GMR) BASED SELFNULLING PROBE
DEEP FLAW DETECTION WITH GIANT MAGNETORESISTIVE (GMR) BASED SELFNULLING PROBE Buzz Wincheski and Min Namkung NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681 INTRODUCTION The use of giant magnetoresistive
More informationPositive Feedback and Oscillators
Physics 3330 Experiment #5 Fall 2011 Positive Feedback and Oscillators Purpose In this experiment we will study how spontaneous oscillations may be caused by positive feedback. You will construct an active
More informationTesting Power Sources for Stability
Keywords Venable, frequency response analyzer, oscillator, power source, stability testing, feedback loop, error amplifier compensation, impedance, output voltage, transfer function, gain crossover, bode
More informationActive Vibration Control in Ultrasonic Wire Bonding Improving Bondability on Demanding Surfaces
Active Vibration Control in Ultrasonic Wire Bonding Improving Bondability on Demanding Surfaces By Dr.Ing. Michael Brökelmann, Hesse GmbH Ultrasonic wire bonding is an established technology for connecting
More informationPHASES IN A SERIES LRC CIRCUIT
PHASES IN A SERIES LRC CIRCUIT Introduction: In this lab, we will use a computer interface to analyze a series circuit consisting of an inductor (L), a resistor (R), a capacitor (C), and an AC power supply.
More informationOptimizing Performance Using Slotless Motors. Mark Holcomb, Celera Motion
Optimizing Performance Using Slotless Motors Mark Holcomb, Celera Motion Agenda 1. How PWM drives interact with motor resistance and inductance 2. Ways to reduce motor heating 3. Locked rotor test vs.
More informationMicroelectronic Circuits II. Ch 9 : Feedback
Microelectronic Circuits II Ch 9 : Feedback 9.9 Determining the Loop Gain 9.0 The Stability problem 9. Effect on Feedback on the Amplifier Poles 9.2 Stability study using Bode plots 9.3 Frequency Compensation
More informationChapter 13 Oscillators and Data Converters
Chapter 3 Oscillators and Data Converters 3. General Considerations 3.2 Ring Oscillators 3.3 LC Oscillators 3.4 Phase Shift Oscillator 3.5 WienBridge Oscillator 3.6 Crystal Oscillators 3.7 Chapter Summary
More informationOther Effects in PLLs. Behzad Razavi Electrical Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles
Other Effects in PLLs Behzad Razavi Electrical Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles Example of Up and Down Skew and Width Mismatch Approximating the pulses on the control line by
More informationMETHODS TO IMPROVE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF POWER FACTOR PREREGULATORS: AN OVERVIEW
METHODS TO IMPROE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF POWER FACTOR PREREGULATORS: AN OERIEW G. Spiazzi*, P. Mattavelli**, L. Rossetto** *Dept. of Electronics and Informatics, **Dept. of Electrical Engineering University
More informationPole, zero and Bode plot
Pole, zero and Bode plot EC04 305 Lecture notes YESAREKEY December 12, 2007 Authored by: Ramesh.K Pole, zero and Bode plot EC04 305 Lecture notes A rational transfer function H (S) can be expressed as
More informationExam Signal Detection and Noise
Exam Signal Detection and Noise Tuesday 27 January 2015 from 14:00 until 17:00 Lecturer: Sense Jan van der Molen Important: It is not allowed to use a calculator. Complete each question on a separate piece
More informationChapter 13 Oscillators and Data Converters
Chapter 13 Oscillators and Data Converters 13.1 General Considerations 13.2 Ring Oscillators 13.3 LC Oscillators 13.4 Phase Shift Oscillator 13.5 WienBridge Oscillator 13.6 Crystal Oscillators 13.7 Chapter
More informationD102. Damped Mechanical Oscillator
D10. Damped Mechanical Oscillator Aim: design and writing an application for investigation of a damped mechanical oscillator Measurements of free oscillations of a damped oscillator Measurements of forced
More information10 Electromagnetic Interactions
Lab 10 Electromagnetic Interactions What You Need To Know: The Physics Electricity and magnetism are intrinsically linked and not separate phenomena. A changing magnetic field can create an electric field
More informationDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS FOR A DC BUCKBOOST CONVERTER
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS FOR A DC BUCKBOOST CONVERTER Murdoch University: The Murdoch School of Engineering & Information Technology Author: Jason Chan Supervisors: Martina Calais &
More informationFigure 4.1 Vector representation of magnetic field.
Chapter 4 Design of Vector Magnetic Field Sensor System 4.1 3Dimensional Vector Field Representation The vector magnetic field is represented as a combination of three components along the Cartesian coordinate
More informationPreliminary study of the vibration displacement measurement by using strain gauge
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 32 (5), 453459, Sep.  Oct. 2010 Original Article Preliminary study of the vibration displacement measurement by using strain gauge Siripong Eamchaimongkol* Department
More informationTable of Contents...2. About the Tutorial...6. Audience...6. Prerequisites...6. Copyright & Disclaimer EMI INTRODUCTION Voltmeter...
1 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 About the Tutorial...6 Audience...6 Prerequisites...6 Copyright & Disclaimer...6 1. EMI INTRODUCTION... 7 Voltmeter...7 Ammeter...8 Ohmmeter...8 Multimeter...9
More informationAutomatic Control Systems 2017 Spring Semester
Automatic Control Systems 2017 Spring Semester Assignment Set 1 Dr. Kalyana C. Veluvolu Deadline: 11APR  16:00 hours @ IT1815 1) Find the transfer function / for the following system using block diagram
More informationConstant Current Control for DCDC Converters
Constant Current Control for DCDC Converters Introduction...1 Theory of Operation...1 Power Limitations...1 Voltage Loop Stability...2 Current Loop Compensation...3 Current Control Example...5 Battery
More informationof harmonic cancellation algorithms The internal model principle enable precision motion control Dynamic control
Dynamic control Harmonic cancellation algorithms enable precision motion control The internal model principle is a 30yearsyoung idea that serves as the basis for a myriad of modern motion control approaches.
More informationsin(wt) y(t) Exciter Vibrating armature ENME599 1
ENME599 1 LAB #3: Kinematic Excitation (Forced Vibration) of a SDOF system Students must read the laboratory instruction manual prior to the lab session. The lab report must be submitted in the beginning
More informationDigital Signal Processing in RF Applications
Digital Signal Processing in RF Applications Part II Thomas Schilcher Outline 1. signal conditioning / down conversion 2. detection of amp./phase by digital I/Q sampling I/Q sampling non I/Q sampling digital
More information