Proportional-Integral Controller Performance
|
|
- Cori Gregory
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proportional-Integral Controller Performance Silver Team Jonathan Briere ENGR 329 Dr. Henry 4/1/21 Silver Team Members: Jordan Buecker Jonathan Briere John Colvin
2 1. Introduction Modeling for the response of a Proportional-Only Controller was completed, to provide a basis for an experiment. The modeling was based on parameters previously acquired by Root Locus modeling, as well as former experiments throughout the semester. Then, experiments were completed using a Proportional-Only and Proportional-Integral controller. Each of these experiments was done to support the theory behind the model. In the case of the level-control station, the experiments could not be related back to the model, since the hardware was changed after modeling was completed. This changed the system parameters which modeling was based upon, resulting in an inaccurate model for the experiments. The report is organized into a background and theory section, followed by the procedure used for the experiments. After the procedure section, results and a discussion of the results will follow. The report will end with conclusions of the experiment and recommendations. The background and theory sections will present the technical background of the experiment as well as schematics of the system. First, the SSOC operation of the system will be discussed. Then, frequency modeling and experiments will be introduced. The Root-Locus theory and procedures for modeling will then be presented as a basis for the proportional controller design and experiments. The procedure section will provide a description of the steps used to complete the modeling and the physical experiments. The results section will provide tables and graphs obtained by models and experiments. The discussion section will look at the relevance, accuracy, and discrepancies of the results. The conclusions and recommendations section will provide a brief summary of the experiment and state anything that might be done to improve the 2 JB 4/14/1
3 experiment. Finally, the appendices will contain any intermediate data or results that are not pertinent to the presentation of results. 3 JB 4/14/1
4 2. Background and Theory 2.1 System Description The system used for all modeling and experiment is the Level Control Station.. Figure 1 shows physical representation of the system. Water is pumped from the basin, into the upper tank. Water is then routed from the upper tank to the lower tank, and back to the basin. Both tanks are equipped with overflow tubes, allowing water to be routed back to the basin without overflowing. Figure 1: System Diagram 4 JB 4/14/1
5 From the basin, water is pumped into an upper tank where it drains only under the force of gravity into the lower tank. The lower tank is equipped with a pressure sensor. The pressure sensor converts the water pressure into an electrical signal and relays that signal back to the LabVIEW software, through a data acquisition board. The LabVIEW program computes the height of the water in the tank based on the signal. The user may define a percentage of the maximum power input to the pump motor. The percentage of input to the pump corresponds to the steady state level that the water reaches in the tank. Figure 2: Level Control System Diagram Figure 2 depicts the process for the system. The input is the manipulated variable and is the percentage of power delivered to the motor. The system responds to manipulation of M(t) and the output, C(t), changes according to that response. C(t) is known as the control variable. 2.2 Steady State Operation Results The Steady State Operating Curve (SSOC) was determined by running different trials at specified increments. The user controls the duration of the experiment as well as the input percentage of the pump. From this, data returned to the operator by the system may be exported to Excel. 5 JB 4/14/1
6 The data was first graphed to plot the input (%) versus the time (sec) with the output (cm) on the secondary y-axis. This provided visual inspection of the start-up of the system and an approximation of where the system reaches steady-state. Graphs were constructed for all of the trials, which begin at 6% input and continue to 1% in 1% increments. Figure 3 provides the graph of the data for a 8% pump input. 8% Output (cm) Time (sec) Figure 3: Input versus time with output on secondary y-axis for 8% run. In the region of steady state, the mean and standard deviation were computed using the appropriate functions in Excel. The graphs for the other runs may be found in the appendix. The mean, standard deviation, and 2 times the standard deviation for the steady-state regions were computed for each run and tabulated to construct the steady state operating curve. Table 1 shows this data. Table xxxxx: Data for steady state operating curve. 6 JB 4/14/1
7 Input (%) Output (cm) StDev (cm) 2 X StDev (cm) The average output was plotted against the input to construct the steady state operating curve below in figure 4. The slope of the line is the gain of the system. Uncertainty was taken to be 2 times the standard deviation and is represented on the graph by vertical error bars. There appears to be some discrepancy in the range between 7% and 9% as the slope varies significantly. The maximum deviation from the mean for this experiment is about 1.5% indicating that the height of water in the tank can be reasonably ascertained based on the input percentage to the pump in the operating range. 7 JB 4/14/1
8 Figure 4: Steady state operating curve 2.3 Step Response and Modeling Results The step response occurs when a system operating at steady state receives a sudden, definite, input change. The state between the two steady state portions is what is referred to as the step response curve. The first order plus dead time (FOPDT) parameters of the system are calculated from this section of the graph. The FOPDT parameters are: dead time (t), first order time constant (tau), and gain (K). The step response portion of the lab was performed in the same manner as the steady state lab. The only addition was to step the motor input up or down by 1% once the water level reached a steady state. This was performed from 7-8, 8-9, 9-1, 1-9, 9-8, and 8-7 percent motor inputs. After motor input was stepped, the water was allowed to reach steady state at the new motor input. Figure 5 shows a typical step response 8 JB 4/14/1
9 graph and associated parameters for the system. Graphs of the averages the parameters for the different regions may be found in the appendix. Figure 5: Typical step response for level control system Figure 6 shows the results for the step response modeling for the 9-1 motor input range. 9 JB 4/14/1
10 Figure 6: 9-1 Step Response Model The input function for both the model (light blue line) and the experimental (dark blue line) match up perfectly as shown in figure 6 above. This is to be expected since the input is the manipulated variable. In the case of the step response the only parameter that had to be changed was the time that the step occurred; in the case shown above this happens at approximately 2s. The model output shown above (green line) was fit to the experimental output s shape of the step response portion of the experimental output (red line) by changing the following parameters: dead time, gain, time constant, input baseline, output baseline. The dead time, gain, and time constant that were used in the modeling are shown below in Table 2.The models for the rest of the operating range can be found in the appendix. 2.4 Frequency Response Results The data were tabulated and analyzed using Excel. Figure 7 shows the frequency response at.3 hz for the 7-8% range. The other graphs are located in the appendix. 1 JB 4/14/1
11 Figure 7: Graph of input versus time for 7-8% sine response Table 3 shows the frequencies and corresponding amplitude ratios and phase shifts for the 7-8% range. These were obtained directly from the input percentage versus time graphs at the different frequencies. Table 1: Table of frequencies and corresponding AR and PS for 7-8% range Frequency AR PS The system was allowed to run long enough to complete one full cycle (time > period). Because the systems had to run so long (more than 1 minutes for most trials) it was not reasonable to 11 JB 4/14/1
12 allow the system to run for multiple cycles. Because of these time restraints, it was not possible to have replications and data for statistical analysis. Bode diagrams were constructed using the data in table 4. Figure 8 shows the bode diagram for the 7-8% region. The diagram is the graph of the AR versus the frequency on a log-log scale imposed on top of the PS versus frequency graph (semi-log with frequency being logarithmic). The frequency axes are scaled identically to ensure the graph line up properly. From this diagram the FOPDT parameters were obtained. K was found to be.75cm / %, the ultimate gain (1/ARu) was found to be 5 % / cm the order of the system was found by the negative slope of the graph of AR versus frequency at lower frequencies and was found to be about.25. Finally, the ultimate frequency was found to be.1 cycles/second. 12 JB 4/14/1
13 Figure 8: Bode diagram for the 7-8% region Dr Henry provided instructions to model the frequency response using Excel. This modeling yielded the most accurate values for the FOPTD parameters. Figures 9 and 1 show the graphical results of this modeling. 13 JB 4/14/1
14 Frequency Figure 9: Graph of AR versus frequency for frequency modeling.1 Frequency Experimental Model Figure 1: Graph of PA versus frequency for frequency modeling. Table 4 gives the FOPDT parameters found from the frequency response modeling. The gain was found to be.88 cm / %. The dead time was 3 seconds and the time constant was JB 4/14/1
15 seconds. These values will be the ones used for the FOPDT parameters for the remainder of the semester. Table 2: Table of FOPDT parameters found from frequency response modeling. Parameters K=.88 to= 3 tau= Root Locus The open loop transfer function (OLTF) is the product of all of the transfer functions in the control loop. The system diagram is shown in figure 11. Figure 11: Control loop system diagram Ke t os For this loop, the OLTF is, K c τs +1 Ke t o s K c τs +1 The closed loop transfer function(cltf) is modeled by. Using Pade s Ke t os 1+ K c τs +1 K 1 t s 2 K c (τs +1) 1 + t s 2 approximation, the CLTF becomes K 1 t s 2 1+ K c (τs +1) 1 + t s 2 15 JB 4/14/1
16 The characteristic equation is the denominator of this function set equal to zero and through t algebraic manipulation becomes, τs τ + t 2 K K t c s + K 2 c K +1=, a quadratic which may be solved for various values of Kc and plotted on an imaginary coordinate system to produce the root locus plot. 2.5 Proportional-Only Controllers The error between the setpoint and the controlled variable output is known by e( t) r( t) c( t) =, Where r (t) is the setpoint of the system, and c (t) is the controlled variable. The controller output for a Proportional-Only Controller is described by m( t) = m + K e( t) C Where m (t) is the controller output and m is the bias; the output from the controller when the error is zero. 2.6 Proportional-Integral Controllers In Proportional-Integral Controllers, an extra amount of intelligence is added to the controller to solve for the correct controller output which will remove the offset. The controller output is described by whereτ I is the integral time. KC m( t) = m + KC e( t) + e( t) dt, τ I 16 JB 4/14/1
17 3. Procedure 3.1 Root-Locus Modeling Using a spreadsheet provided by Dr. Henry, five K values were determined: K CU, the ultimate frequency of the system, K CD, the quarter decay value, C1 K, the 1/1 th decay, K C5, the 1/5 th decay, and finally, K CD, the critical damping value, were plotted and behavior was observed. Parameters obtained from previous experiments were used as input to generate the model. Each controller gain value was found by using given ratios of imaginary over real, then matching these ratios for the equivalent K C in the root locus modeling. 3.2 Proportional-only Controller Design Using a spreadsheet provided by Dr. Henry, were plotted. Then, several of these K C values obtained from the Root-Locus modeling K C values were plotted. From these graphs, the Decay Ratio, Monotonic/Oscillatory response, Settling Time, and Offset were noted. 3.3 Proportional-only Controller Experiment As instructed by Dr. Henry, the team ran experiments for values of K C ranging from 1. to 7.. Since the pump in the system was replaced, the system parameters changed, and the system would not respond as it did in the model. To choose the set point, the team ran the system at an input level of 7%, and let the system reach steady-state. This steady state output value was then chosen as a basis for the set point of the system. The team initially ran the experiment for a set point 5 cm above this set point, let the system reach steady state, then lowered the set point back 17 JB 4/14/1
18 to the value determined by the initial steady-state run. Results were outputted to a spreadsheet, and the results were graphed, and checked for the offset, decay ratio, monotonic or oscillatory and settling time. 3.4 Proportional-Integral Controller Experiment K C values ranging from 1. to 7. were once again run for the proportional integral controller. Α τ I value of 3 seconds was used for all experiments. Since the system calibration parameters were lost, the set point value was run from 3cm to 6cm, as instructed by Dr. Henry. This range of output gave data around the mid span of the input operating range. 18 JB 4/14/1
19 4. Results 4.1 Root-Locus Modeling The results obtained for Root-Locus Modeling were introduced in the background of this report. 4.2 Proportional-only Controller Design Kc TIME Figure 12: Modeled Proportional-Only controller response for range K C =1, 7-8% input Figure 12 shows a typical modeled Proportional-Only controller response for a K C value of 1.1. Table xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx shows the tabulated results of the experiments from two different runs. All models are contained in the Appendix under figures XXXXX through XXXXX. 19 JB 4/14/1
20 Table XXXXX: Summary of P-controller design modeling: 7-8% range Decay Settling K Description C Ratio Monotonic/Oscilliatory Time Offset Ultimate Oscilliatory Never N/A Root Locus 1/5 Decay Oscilliatory 3 sec 1 Root Locus 1/1 Decay Oscilliatory 2 sec 1.5 1/K*(tau/t) Oscilliatory 1 sec 2 Root Locus 1/4 Decay 1.1 Oscilliatory 15 sec 2.5 Underdamped.4 Monotonic 75 sec 3.5 Table XXXXX: Summary of P-controller design modeling: 8-9% range Decay Settling K Description C Ratio Monotonic/Oscilliatory Time Offset Ultimate 29 1 Oscilliatory Never N/A Root Locus 1/4 Decay 19.7 Oscilliatory Never.5 Root Locus 1/1 Decay 15.3 Oscilliatory Root Locus 1/5 Decay 6.1 Oscilliatory Critical 3.1 Oscilliatory Underdamped 1 Monotonic Table XXXXX: Summary of P-controller design modeling: 9-1% range Decay Settling K Description C Ratio Monotonic/Oscilliatory Time Offset Ultimate Oscilliatory Never N/A Root Locus 1/5 Decay Oscilliatory 5 sec.5 Root Locus 1/1 Decay Oscilliatory 3 sec 1.5 1/K*(tau/t) Oscilliatory 22 sec 1.75 Root Locus 1/4 Decay 1.1 Oscilliatory 2 sec 2.5 Underdamped.4 Monotonic 2 sec JB 4/14/1
21 4.3 Proportional-only Controller Experiment Figure 13: P only controller experiment. Figure 13 depicts an experiment run at a K C value of 3. The setpoint was first set to 21cm, then lowered to 16 cm, output value corresponding to an output bias of 7%, as predicted by an earlier experiment. Experiments were run by two of the team members. Additional graphs for values run can be found under figures xxxx through xxx of the appendix. 4.4 Proportional-only Controller Experiment 21 JB 4/14/1
22 Figure 14: Proportional-Integral Controller Experiment with K C = 1 Figure 14 shows the results of an experiment run for a set point varying from 6 cm to 3 cm, with a controller gain of 1, and an integral time constant of 3 seconds. Additional experiments were run following the same parameters to reinforce the accuracy of behavior of the system, and can be seen in the appendix under figures xxxxxxxxx through xxxxxxxxxxx. 5. Discussion 5.1 Root-Locus Modeling 5.2 Proportional-only Controller Design 22 JB 4/14/1
23 5.3 Proportional-only Controller Experiment 5.4 Proportional-Integral Controller Experiment 6. Conclusions and Recommendations 5.1 Root-Locus Modeling 5.2 Proportional-only Controller Design 5.3 Proportional-only Controller Experiment 5.4 Proportional-Integral Controller Experiment 23 JB 4/14/1
24 Appendix 8% Time (sec) Output (cm) A3: Graph of input and output versus time for 8% run. 9% Output (cm) Time (sec) A4: Graph of input and output versus time for 9% run. 24 JB 4/14/1
25 1% Output (cm) Time (sec) A5: Graph of input and output versus time for 1% run A6: Step Response for 6-7 Motor Input 25 JB 4/14/1
26 A7: Step Response for 7-8 Motor Input A1: Step Response for 1-9 Motor Input 26 JB 4/14/1
27 A11: Step Response for 9-8 Motor Input A14: Step Response Model for 7-8 Motor Input 27 JB 4/14/1
28 A15: Step Response Model for 8-9 Motor Input 28 JB 4/14/1
29 A17: Step Response Model for 1-9 Motor Input A18: Step Response Model for 9-8 Motor Input A19: Step Response Model for 8-7 Motor Input 29 JB 4/14/1
30 Average Gain UP Dow n UP Dow n.7 Gain (cm/%) Dow n.3 UP Input Operating Range (%) A2: Average Gain Average Tau Dow n 11 9 Tau (s) 7 5 UP UP Dow n UP 3 Dow n Input Operating Range (%) A21: Average Tau 3 JB 4/14/1
31 A22: Average dead time A23: Bode diagram 31 JB 4/14/1
32 A24: Root locus plot Engineering Time (sec) A25: 7-8%.2 frequency 32 JB 4/14/1
33 A26: 7-8%.3 frequency Engineering Time (sec) A27: 7-8%.6 frequency 33 JB 4/14/1
34 Engineering Time (sec) A28: 7-8%.1 frequency Frequency A29: AR versus frequency model 34 JB 4/14/1
35 .1 Frequency Experimental Model A3: AR versus frequency model 35 JB 4/14/1
Using Root Locus Modeling for Proportional Controller Design for Spray Booth Pressure System
1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Engineering 3280L Using Root Locus Modeling for Proportional Controller Design for Spray Booth Pressure System By: 2 Introduction: The objectives for these experiments
More informationAERATOR MIXING STATION
AERATOR MIXING STATION Steady State, Step Response Analysis, Sine and Relay Analysis, Root Locus Green Team: Marc Labrie Matt Baltimore Michael Newman Michael Sherrit University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
More informationUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Step Response Modeling. Control Systems Laboratory
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Step Response Modeling Control Systems Laboratory By Stephen Rue Tan Team (Stephanie Raulston, Stefan Hanley) Course: ENGR 3280L Section: 000 Date: 03/06/2013 Instructor:
More informationAERATOR MIXING STATION
AERATOR MIXING STATION Green Team: Marc Labrie Matt Baltimore Michael Newman Michael Sherrit University of Tennessee at Chattanooga April 13, 211 ENGR 328L OVERVIEW System Overview SSOC Analysis Step Response
More informationLab Report 4: Root Locus and Proportional Controller
Lab Report 4: Root Locus and Proportional Controller University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Engineering 32 Blue Team Kevin Schrumpf Justin Anchanattu Justin Rehagen April 1, 212 Introduction The first
More informationUniversity of Tennessee at. Chattanooga
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Step Response Engineering 329 By Gold Team: Jason Price Jered Swartz Simon Ionashku 2-3- 2 INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the experiments was to investigate and understand
More informationUTC. Engineering 329. Frequency Response for the Flow System. Gold Team. By: Blake Nida. Partners: Roger Lemond and Stuart Rymer
UTC Engineering 329 Frequency Response for the Flow System Gold Team By: Blake Nida Partners: Roger Lemond and Stuart Rymer March 9, 2007 Introduction: The purpose of the frequency response experiments
More informationFrequency Response for Flow System
Frequency Response for Flow System Report By: Ben Gordon Red Squad: Ben Klinger, Dianah Dugan UTC, Engineering 329 October 7, 2007 Introduction The objective of this experiment is to observe the output
More informationCourse: ENGR 329 Section: 001 Date: 02/26/2010 Instructor: Dr. Jim M. Henry
1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Filter Wash Stations, Both Valves Closed Steady State Operating Curve Engineering 329 By Timmy Collins Lilac Team Tim Garner, Walt Mandrel and You Gao Course: ENGR
More informationSteady State Operating Curve
Steady State Operating Curve By Lanze Berry University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Engineering 3280L Blue Team (Khanh Nguyen, Justin Cartwright) Course: ENGR 3280L Section: 001 Date: September 4, 2012
More informationSteady State Operating Curve
1 Steady State Operating Curve University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Engineering 3280L Instructor: Dr. Jim Henry By: Fuchsia Team: Jonathan Brewster, Jonathan Wooten Date: February 1, 2013 2 Introduction
More informationAerator Mixer Speed Control System Step Response Modeling
UTC Engineering 3280L Matthew Addison Green Team (Michael Hansen) 9/4/12 Aerator Mixer Speed Control System Step Response Modeling Introduction In this experiment a program that models the aerator mixing
More informationSteady-State and Step Response for the Flow System
Steady-State and Step Response for the Flow System Report By: Dianah Dugan Red Squad: Ben Klinger, Ben Gordon UTC, Engineering 329 September 19, 2007 Introduction: The objectives of this experiment are
More informationUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Steady State and Step Response. By: Alex Bedley. Engineering 3280L. Buff. (Alexander Hudson, Ashley Poe)
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Steady State and Step Response By: Alex Bedley Engineering 328L Buff (Alexander Hudson, Ashley Poe) February 1, 13 Introduction In the past two experiments, we were
More informationSteady State Operating Curve Voltage Control System
UTC Engineering 39 Steady State Operating Curve Voltage Control System Michael Edge Partners: Michael Woolery Nathan Holland September 5, 7 Introduction A steady state operating curve was created to show
More informationSteady-State and Step Response for the Flow System
Steady-State and Step Response for the Flow System Report By: Dianah Dugan Red Squad: Ben Klinger, Ben Gordon UTC, Engineering 329 September 19, 2007 Introduction: The objectives of this experiment are
More informationUniversity of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Stead State Operating Curve Report. Engr 3280L/Week 3. William Disterdick. Brown Team
1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Stead State Operating Curve Report Engr 3280L/Week 3 By Brown Team (Trent, William, William) 09/05/2012 2 Introduction: In this laboratory, a percentage of power
More informationClass 5. Competency Exam Round 1. The Process Designer s Process. Process Control Preliminaries. On/Off Control The Simplest Controller
Class 5 Competency Exam Round 1 Proportional Control Starts Friday, September 17 Ends Friday, October 1 Process Control Preliminaries The final control element, process and sensor/transmitter all have
More information-binary sensors and actuators (such as an on/off controller) are generally more reliable and less expensive
Process controls are necessary for designing safe and productive plants. A variety of process controls are used to manipulate processes, however the most simple and often most effective is the PID controller.
More informationCHAPTER 6 INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
CHAPTER 6 INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Broadly speaking, system identification is the art and science of using measurements obtained from a system to characterize the system. The characterization
More informationTennessee Senior Bridge Mathematics
A Correlation of to the Mathematics Standards Approved July 30, 2010 Bid Category 13-130-10 A Correlation of, to the Mathematics Standards Mathematics Standards I. Ways of Looking: Revisiting Concepts
More informationTeaching Mechanical Students to Build and Analyze Motor Controllers
Teaching Mechanical Students to Build and Analyze Motor Controllers Hugh Jack, Associate Professor Padnos School of Engineering Grand Valley State University Grand Rapids, MI email: jackh@gvsu.edu Session
More informationThe Discussion of this exercise covers the following points: Angular position control block diagram and fundamentals. Power amplifier 0.
Exercise 6 Motor Shaft Angular Position Control EXERCISE OBJECTIVE When you have completed this exercise, you will be able to associate the pulses generated by a position sensing incremental encoder with
More informationEE Experiment 8 Bode Plots of Frequency Response
EE16:Exp8-1 EE 16 - Experiment 8 Bode Plots of Frequency Response Objectives: To illustrate the relationship between a system frequency response and the frequency response break frequencies, factor powers,
More informationDetermining the Dynamic Characteristics of a Process
Exercise 5-1 Determining the Dynamic Characteristics of a Process EXERCISE OBJECTIVE In this exercise, you will determine the dynamic characteristics of a process. DISCUSSION OUTLINE The Discussion of
More informationAppendix III Graphs in the Introductory Physics Laboratory
Appendix III Graphs in the Introductory Physics Laboratory 1. Introduction One of the purposes of the introductory physics laboratory is to train the student in the presentation and analysis of experimental
More informationExperiment 2: Transients and Oscillations in RLC Circuits
Experiment 2: Transients and Oscillations in RLC Circuits Will Chemelewski Partner: Brian Enders TA: Nielsen See laboratory book #1 pages 5-7, data taken September 1, 2009 September 7, 2009 Abstract Transient
More informationMTE 360 Automatic Control Systems University of Waterloo, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering
MTE 36 Automatic Control Systems University of Waterloo, Department of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering Laboratory #1: Introduction to Control Engineering In this laboratory, you will become familiar
More informationMotomatic Servo Control
Exercise 2 Motomatic Servo Control This exercise will take two weeks. You will work in teams of two. 2.0 Prelab Read through this exercise in the lab manual. Using Appendix B as a reference, create a block
More informationCHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 11-1 Road Map of the Lecture XI Controller Design and PID
More informationFrequency Response Analysis and Design Tutorial
1 of 13 1/11/2011 5:43 PM Frequency Response Analysis and Design Tutorial I. Bode plots [ Gain and phase margin Bandwidth frequency Closed loop response ] II. The Nyquist diagram [ Closed loop stability
More informationECE4902 Lab 5 Simulation. Simulation. Export data for use in other software tools (e.g. MATLAB or excel) to compare measured data with simulation
ECE4902 Lab 5 Simulation Simulation Export data for use in other software tools (e.g. MATLAB or excel) to compare measured data with simulation Be sure to have your lab data available from Lab 5, Common
More informationLECTURE FOUR Time Domain Analysis Transient and Steady-State Response Analysis
LECTURE FOUR Time Domain Analysis Transient and Steady-State Response Analysis 4.1 Transient Response and Steady-State Response The time response of a control system consists of two parts: the transient
More informationRectilinear System. Introduction. Hardware
Rectilinear System Introduction This lab studies the dynamic behavior of a system of translational mass, spring and damper components. The system properties will be determined first making use of basic
More informationMAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers. Final Exam. December 11, 2006
MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers Final Exam December 11, 2006 o Closed Book and Notes o No Calculators 1. Fill in your name on side 2 of the scoring sheet (Last name first!) 2. Fill
More informationHomework Assignment 07
Homework Assignment 07 Question 1 (Short Takes). 2 points each unless otherwise noted. 1. A single-pole op-amp has an open-loop low-frequency gain of A = 10 5 and an open loop, 3-dB frequency of 4 Hz.
More informationFree vibration of cantilever beam FREE VIBRATION OF CANTILEVER BEAM PROCEDURE
FREE VIBRATION OF CANTILEVER BEAM PROCEDURE AIM Determine the damped natural frequency, logarithmic decrement and damping ratio of a given system from the free vibration response Calculate the mass of
More informationDifferent Controller Terms
Loop Tuning Lab Challenges Not all PID controllers are the same. They don t all use the same units for P-I-and D. There are different types of processes. There are different final element types. There
More informationDetermining the Dynamic Characteristics of a Process
Exercise 1-1 Determining the Dynamic Characteristics of a Process EXERCISE OBJECTIVE Familiarize yourself with three methods to determine the dynamic characteristics of a process. DISCUSSION OUTLINE The
More informationScience Binder and Science Notebook. Discussions
Lane Tech H. Physics (Joseph/Machaj 2016-2017) A. Science Binder Science Binder and Science Notebook Name: Period: Unit 1: Scientific Methods - Reference Materials The binder is the storage device for
More informationEMPIRICAL MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND PID CONTROLLER TUNING FOR A FLOW PROCESS
Volume 118 No. 20 2018, 2015-2021 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu ijpam.eu EMPIRICAL MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND PID CONTROLLER TUNING FOR A FLOW
More informationDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers. Final Examination.
Name: Number: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers Final Examination December 12, 2002 Closed Book and Notes 1. Be sure to fill in your
More informationIntroduction to Signals and Systems Lecture #9 - Frequency Response. Guillaume Drion Academic year
Introduction to Signals and Systems Lecture #9 - Frequency Response Guillaume Drion Academic year 2017-2018 1 Transmission of complex exponentials through LTI systems Continuous case: LTI system where
More informationLaboratory 5: RC Circuits and Filtering
5.1 Introduction Laboratory 5: ircuits and Filtering For this lab, you will be comparing the experimental behavior of a filter with analytical behavior modeled in MATLAB using Bode plots. During the lab
More informationLab 0: Orientation. 1 Introduction: Oscilloscope. Refer to Appendix E for photos of the apparatus
Lab 0: Orientation Major Divison 1 Introduction: Oscilloscope Refer to Appendix E for photos of the apparatus Oscilloscopes are used extensively in the laboratory courses Physics 2211 and Physics 2212.
More informationDesign of Model Based PID Controller Tuning for Pressure Process
ISSN (Print) : 3 3765 Design of Model Based PID Controller Tuning for Pressure Process A.Kanchana 1, G.Lavanya, R.Nivethidha 3, S.Subasree 4, P.Aravind 5 UG student, Dept. of ICE, Saranathan College Engineering,
More informationMotor Modeling and Position Control Lab 3 MAE 334
Motor ing and Position Control Lab 3 MAE 334 Evan Coleman April, 23 Spring 23 Section L9 Executive Summary The purpose of this experiment was to observe and analyze the open loop response of a DC servo
More informationProcess controls in food processing
Process controls in food processing Module- 9 Lec- 9 Dr. Shishir Sinha Dept. of Chemical Engineering IIT Roorkee A well designed process ought to be easy to control. More importantly, it is best to consider
More informationChapter 4 PID Design Example
Chapter 4 PID Design Example I illustrate the principles of feedback control with an example. We start with an intrinsic process P(s) = ( )( ) a b ab = s + a s + b (s + a)(s + b). This process cascades
More informationDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers. Final Examination.
Name: Number: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering MAE334 - Introduction to Instrumentation and Computers Final Examination December 12, 2003 Closed Book and Notes 1. Be sure to fill in your
More informationSRV02-Series Rotary Experiment # 3. Ball & Beam. Student Handout
SRV02-Series Rotary Experiment # 3 Ball & Beam Student Handout SRV02-Series Rotary Experiment # 3 Ball & Beam Student Handout 1. Objectives The objective in this experiment is to design a controller for
More information4 Experiment 4: DC Motor Voltage to Speed Transfer Function Estimation by Step Response and Frequency Response (Part 2)
4 Experiment 4: DC Motor Voltage to Speed Transfer Function Estimation by Step Response and Frequency Response (Part 2) 4.1 Introduction This lab introduces new methods for estimating the transfer function
More informationDC and AC Circuits. Objective. Theory. 1. Direct Current (DC) R-C Circuit
[International Campus Lab] Objective Determine the behavior of resistors, capacitors, and inductors in DC and AC circuits. Theory ----------------------------- Reference -------------------------- Young
More informationModeling and Analysis of Systems Lecture #9 - Frequency Response. Guillaume Drion Academic year
Modeling and Analysis of Systems Lecture #9 - Frequency Response Guillaume Drion Academic year 2015-2016 1 Outline Frequency response of LTI systems Bode plots Bandwidth and time-constant 1st order and
More informationExperiment 1 LRC Transients
Physics 263 Experiment 1 LRC Transients 1 Introduction In this experiment we will study the damped oscillations and other transient waveforms produced in a circuit containing an inductor, a capacitor,
More informationTESTING EQUIPMENT SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS SOIL. established in 1972
SOIL www.alfatestusa.com established in 1972 SOIL Used to perform large range of Triaxial tests on soil samples to determine the strength parameters and the mechanical properties. Capable of performing:
More informationOptimal Control System Design
Chapter 6 Optimal Control System Design 6.1 INTRODUCTION The active AFO consists of sensor unit, control system and an actuator. While designing the control system for an AFO, a trade-off between the transient
More informationNZQA unit standard version 2 Page 1 of 5. Demonstrate and apply intermediate knowledge of instrumentation and control system engineering
Page 1 of 5 Title Demonstrate and apply intermediate knowledge of instrumentation and control system engineering Level 5 Credits 15 Purpose This unit standard covers intermediate knowledge of the concepts
More informationEXPERIMENT NO. 4 EXPERIMENTS ON LADDER PROGRAMMING FOR MECHATRONICS SYSTEM
EXPERIMENT NO. 4 EXPERIMENTS ON LADDER PROGRAMMING FOR MECHATRONICS SYSTEM DATE OF PERFORMANCE : INTRODUCTION: A Programmable Logic Controller, or PLC, is more or less a small computer with a built-in
More informationLab E2: B-field of a Solenoid. In the case that the B-field is uniform and perpendicular to the area, (1) reduces to
E2.1 Lab E2: B-field of a Solenoid In this lab, we will explore the magnetic field created by a solenoid. First, we must review some basic electromagnetic theory. The magnetic flux over some area A is
More informationSTATION NUMBER: LAB SECTION: Filters. LAB 6: Filters ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 43/100 INTRODUCTION TO MICROELECTRONIC CIRCUITS
Lab 6: Filters YOUR EE43/100 NAME: Spring 2013 YOUR PARTNER S NAME: YOUR SID: YOUR PARTNER S SID: STATION NUMBER: LAB SECTION: Filters LAB 6: Filters Pre- Lab GSI Sign- Off: Pre- Lab: /40 Lab: /60 Total:
More informationRunning Laboratory Experiments via the World Wide Web
3513 Running Laboratory Experiments via the World Wide Web Jim Henry The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Abstract The chemical engineering laboratories at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
More informationAppendix C: Graphing. How do I plot data and uncertainties? Another technique that makes data analysis easier is to record all your data in a table.
Appendix C: Graphing One of the most powerful tools used for data presentation and analysis is the graph. Used properly, graphs are an important guide to understanding the results of an experiment. They
More informationSKN3022 PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION CHAPTER III INSTRUMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS
SKN3022 PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION CHAPTER III INSTRUMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS Dr Saharudin Haron Hanizam Sulaiman INSTRUMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS Shows the performance of instruments to be used. Divided
More informationVer. 4/5/2002, 1:11 PM 1
Mechatronics II Laboratory Exercise 6 PID Design The purpose of this exercise is to study the effects of a PID controller on a motor-load system. Although not a second-order system, a PID controlled motor-load
More informationVarious Controller Design and Tuning Methods for a First Order Plus Dead Time Process
International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Vol. 1, No. 2, July-December 2010, pp. 161-165 Various Controller Design and Tuning Methods for a First Order Plus Dead Time Process Pradeep Kumar
More informationSET POINT TRACKING CAPABILITY ANALYSIS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL IPDT PROCESS MODEL
Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronics & Instrumentation Engineering: An international Journal (EEIEJ), Vol., No., August 24 SET POINT TRACKING CAPABILITY ANALYSIS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL IPDT PROCESS MODEL
More informationUSE OF BASIC ELECTRONIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS Part II, & ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT ERROR 1
EE 241 Experiment #3: USE OF BASIC ELECTRONIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS Part II, & ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT ERROR 1 PURPOSE: To become familiar with additional the instruments in the laboratory. To become aware
More informationExperiment G: Introduction to Graphical Representation of Data & the Use of Excel
Experiment G: Introduction to Graphical Representation of Data & the Use of Excel Scientists answer posed questions by performing experiments which provide information about a given problem. After collecting
More informationGLOSSARY OF TERMS FOR PROCESS CONTROL
Y1900SS-1a 1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS FOR PROCESS CONTROL Accuracy Conformity of an indicated value to an accepted standard value, or true value. Accuracy, Reference A number or quantity which defines the limit
More informationLab 4 Projectile Motion
b Lab 4 Projectile Motion Physics 211 Lab What You Need To Know: 1 x = x o + voxt + at o ox 2 at v = vox + at at 2 2 v 2 = vox 2 + 2aΔx ox FIGURE 1 Linear FIGURE Motion Linear Equations Motion Equations
More informationIntermediate and Advanced Labs PHY3802L/PHY4822L
Intermediate and Advanced Labs PHY3802L/PHY4822L Torsional Oscillator and Torque Magnetometry Lab manual and related literature The torsional oscillator and torque magnetometry 1. Purpose Study the torsional
More informationEvaluation of Drywall Resilient Sound Isolation Clips. Dr. Peter D Antonio RPG Diffusor Systems, Inc. January 2010
Evaluation of Drywall Resilient Sound Isolation Clips by Dr. Peter D Antonio RPG Diffusor Systems, Inc. January 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 INTRODUCTION 1. THEORY 1.1 TRANSMISSIBILITY 1.2 Static stiffness
More informationECE ECE285. Electric Circuit Analysis I. Spring Nathalia Peixoto. Rev.2.0: Rev Electric Circuits I
ECE285 Electric Circuit Analysis I Spring 2014 Nathalia Peixoto Rev.2.0: 140124. Rev 2.1. 140813 1 Lab reports Background: these 9 experiments are designed as simple building blocks (like Legos) and students
More informationTI25 - Pre-Instructional Survey
TI25 - Pre-Instructional Survey Name: Date: 1. Scheduled maintenance that is planned, with materials on hand, personnel on site, and production planning advised is called maintenance. a. predictive b.
More informationProduct Note 73 Vibration Tester for On-Wafer Tuner Operation
1603 St.Regis D.D.O., Quebec H9B 3H7, Canada Tel 514-684-4554 Fax 514-684-8581 E-mail: info@ focus-microwaves.com Website: http://www.focus-microwaves.com Product Note 73 Vibration Tester for On-Wafer
More informationLAB IV. SILICON DIODE CHARACTERISTICS
LAB IV. SILICON DIODE CHARACTERISTICS 1. OBJECTIVE In this lab you will measure the I-V characteristics of the rectifier and Zener diodes, in both forward and reverse-bias mode, as well as learn what mechanisms
More informationExperiment 9. PID Controller
Experiment 9 PID Controller Objective: - To be familiar with PID controller. - Noting how changing PID controller parameter effect on system response. Theory: The basic function of a controller is to execute
More informationFigure 1: Unity Feedback System. The transfer function of the PID controller looks like the following:
Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Electrical Engineering department Control Systems Design Lab Eng. Mohammed S. Jouda Eng. Ola M. Skeik Experiment 3 PID Controller Overview This experiment
More informationMeasurement, Sensors, and Data Acquisition in the Two-Can System
Measurement, Sensors, and Data Acquisition in the Two-Can System Prof. R.G. Longoria Updated Fall 2010 Goal of this week s lab Gain familiarity with using sensors Gain familiarity with using DAQ hardware
More informationLabview Based Gain scheduled PID Controller for a Non Linear Level Process Station
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) e-issn: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735 PP 05-11 www.iosrjournals.org Labview Based Gain scheduled PID Controller for a Non Linear Level
More informationLab 5 Second Order Transient Response of Circuits
Lab 5 Second Order Transient Response of Circuits Lab Performed on November 5, 2008 by Nicole Kato, Ryan Carmichael, and Ti Wu Report by Ryan Carmichael and Nicole Kato E11 Laboratory Report Submitted
More informationEngineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving, 6e
Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving, 6e Chapter 5 Representation of Technical Information Chapter Objectives 1. Recognize the importance of collecting, recording, plotting, and interpreting technical
More informationEEL2216 Control Theory CT2: Frequency Response Analysis
EEL2216 Control Theory CT2: Frequency Response Analysis 1. Objectives (i) To analyse the frequency response of a system using Bode plot. (ii) To design a suitable controller to meet frequency domain and
More informationExperiment 2 Determining the Capacitive Reactance of a Capacitor in an AC Circuit
Experiment 2 Determining the apacitive eactance of a apacitor in an A ircuit - Objects of the experiments: a- Investigating the voltage and the current at a capacitor in an A circuit b- Observing the phase
More informationTHE SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM
Chapter 11 THE SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM The sinusoidal waveform or sine wave is the fundamental type of alternating current (ac) and alternating voltage. It is also referred to as a sinusoidal wave or, simply,
More informationTeacher s Guide - Activity P51: LR Circuit (Power Output, Voltage Sensor)
Teacher s Guide - Activity P51: LR Circuit (Power Output, Voltage Sensor) Concept DataStudio ScienceWorkshop (Mac) ScienceWorkshop (Win) Circuits P51 LR Circuit.DS (See end of activity) (See end of activity)
More informationEE 210 Lab Exercise #5: OP-AMPS I
EE 210 Lab Exercise #5: OP-AMPS I ITEMS REQUIRED EE210 crate, DMM, EE210 parts kit, T-connector, 50Ω terminator, Breadboard Lab report due at the ASSIGNMENT beginning of the next lab period Data and results
More informationPaul Schafbuch. Senior Research Engineer Fisher Controls International, Inc.
Paul Schafbuch Senior Research Engineer Fisher Controls International, Inc. Introduction Achieving optimal control system performance keys on selecting or specifying the proper flow characteristic. Therefore,
More informationECE 3155 Experiment I AC Circuits and Bode Plots Rev. lpt jan 2013
Signature Name (print, please) Lab section # Lab partner s name (if any) Date(s) lab was performed ECE 3155 Experiment I AC Circuits and Bode Plots Rev. lpt jan 2013 In this lab we will demonstrate basic
More informationPHYS 1112L - Introductory Physics Laboratory II
PHYS 1112L - Introductory Physics Laboratory II Laboratory Advanced Sheet Snell's Law 1. Objectives. The objectives of this laboratory are a. to determine the index of refraction of a liquid using Snell's
More informationBME 3512 Bioelectronics Laboratory Two - Passive Filters
BME 35 Bioelectronics Laboratory Two - Passive Filters Learning Objectives: Understand the basic principles of passive filters. Laboratory Equipment: Agilent Oscilloscope Model 546A Agilent Function Generator
More informationMP211 Principles of Audio Technology
MP211 Principles of Audio Technology Guide to Electronic Measurements Copyright Stanley Wolfe All rights reserved. Acrobat Reader 6.0 or higher required Berklee College of Music MP211 Guide to Electronic
More informationLoop Design. Chapter Introduction
Chapter 8 Loop Design 8.1 Introduction This is the first Chapter that deals with design and we will therefore start by some general aspects on design of engineering systems. Design is complicated because
More informationGE 320: Introduction to Control Systems
GE 320: Introduction to Control Systems Laboratory Section Manual 1 Welcome to GE 320.. 1 www.softbankrobotics.com 1 1 Introduction This section summarizes the course content and outlines the general procedure
More informationLab 4. Crystal Oscillator
Lab 4. Crystal Oscillator Modeling the Piezo Electric Quartz Crystal Most oscillators employed for RF and microwave applications use a resonator to set the frequency of oscillation. It is desirable to
More informationECE 2006 University of Minnesota Duluth Lab 11. AC Circuits
1. Objective AC Circuits In this lab, the student will study sinusoidal voltages and currents in order to understand frequency, period, effective value, instantaneous power and average power. Also, the
More informationLaboratory Assignment 2 Signal Sampling, Manipulation, and Playback
Laboratory Assignment 2 Signal Sampling, Manipulation, and Playback PURPOSE This lab will introduce you to the laboratory equipment and the software that allows you to link your computer to the hardware.
More informationManual CBT current preamplifier PA1 and CBT Reader software Version 1.5
Manual CBT current preamplifier PA1 and CBT Reader software Version 1.5 Aivon Oy Tietotie 3, FI-02150 Finland tel. +358-400-265501 email: info@aivon.fi Updates to this manual found at: www.aivon.fi This
More informationLaboratory PID Tuning Based On Frequency Response Analysis. 2. be able to evaluate system performance for empirical tuning method;
Laboratory PID Tuning Based On Frequency Response Analysis Objectives: At the end, student should 1. appreciate a systematic way of tuning PID loop by the use of process frequency response analysis; 2.
More information