Models, Measurements and Tools for Aircraft Noise
|
|
- Dwain Melton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Models, Measurements and Tools for Aircraft Noise Antonio Filippone 1 & Adrian Harwood 2 School of MACE The University of Manchester Manchester, M13 9PL Abstract This contribution addresses recent advances in the prediction of aircraft noise, including the development of new numerical models and computational tools, supported by an increasing database of noise measurements at commercial airfields. The models and tools described in this contribution are aimed at the optimisation of operational procedures, the improvement in understanding in the causes of noise, the determination of noise maps at realistic airfields, and hence the reduction of noise annoyance from commercial aviation. Examples of comparisons between predictions and field measurements are given as well as noise footprints at London Heathrow. Effects of trajectory displacements are shown for take-off and landings. Airplanes considered include the Airbus A and the Boeing B Gaps in knowledge of low-order methods for aircraft noise are discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION There is strong interest in the use of operational changes of commercial aircraft to reduce noise and to improve airport capacity, subject to minimum disruption to air traffic control and minimum overall environmental emissions. It is thought that operational changes can be implemented with a relatively limited cost, particularly at times when commercial aviation is expanding and adding new airplanes that are to be in service for several decades into the future. There are studies that address step-changes in airplane technology (conceptual designs) [1], but these efforts are unlikely to bring relief in the short term. Thus, the problem is to establish a noise prediction method that is sufficiently comprehensive and sufficiently accurate to guide decision-makers toward new flight procedures. As a result, a number of computerised noise prediction models have been proposed in recent years, although progress in applying new developments has been slow. There is a number of reasons for this. Aside from the complexity of the task, predicting aircraft noise is not a well-posed problem, since many internal and external parameters are unknown, unspecified or stochastic. This is in contrast with fully controlled laboratory experiments. Therefore, there is a problem in terms of validation and verification. At the opposite end of the simulation spectrum there are models that allow the detailed simulation of the acoustic sources, but these models rely on assumptions related to local geometry and operational conditions of the source, and hence, are often impractical. The work discussed in this paper is primarily concerned with practical applications of computer methods for noise prediction. One approach to aircraft noise prediction is through the use of database systems that are coupled with appropriate ancillary models for noise propagation (noise-power-distance), and some flight mechanics. These computer models are not entirely predictive, but are nonetheless routinely used for noise mapping at airports. Examples in this category include INM [2] and ANCON [3], the latter one used in the UK. An alternative approach has emerged in recent years, based on theoretical modelling with experimental data used when possible to identify the main sources of noise, the interference effects and the long range propagation. One important example is the development of ANOPP2 in the USA [4]. 1 School of Mechanical, Aerospace, Civil Engineering. a.filippone@manchester.ac.uk (correspondent). 2 School of Mechanical, Aerospace, Civil Engineering. adrian.harwood@manchester.ac.uk 1
2 The computer model developed for the prediction aircraft noise in this work (FLIGHT) is briefly discussed in this section. The reader is invited to refer to the published literature where several features of this model have been documented, for example [5-10]. In these references, additional literature is cited with regards to numerical methods developed and applied. In short, this is a comprehensive model that contains sub-modules for the reconstruction of the aircraft geometry, modelling of aircraft performance characteristics and also the impact of these parameters on generated noise. This software is fully documented in the published literature (see references). The approach proposed in this paper focuses on the use of low-order methods in FLIGHT. There are numerous reasons why low-order models are both necessary and appropriate. For example, during initial design when very few parameters are established and the engineer needs to have a preliminary assessment of how the system will respond from an acoustic point of view. 2. NOISE MODELS In this section we discuss advancements in numerical methods in several interrelated areas, including airframe noise, propulsion noise, noise propagation physics, system modelling, and operational optimisation. At present, in FLIGHT, we have 22 commercial airplane models (mixed turbofan and turboprop), some of which include sub-versions (nominal, extended range), and different engine options (example: CFM56 and IA V2527 for the Airbus A ). The noise measurement database used for verification includes 18 different airplane types and flight-data-recorder (FDR) data for two different airplanes. 2.1 Simulation Framework The noise simulation in FLIGHT is based on a network of sub-models that are connected through a higher-level driver. This strategy allows the replacement of a sub-model with another one without having to introduce major changes into the software. For example, two different jet noise models are available, as well as three noise propagation models; each of these models can be selected by the user. Figure 1: Network model of the aircraft noise simulation tool FLIGHT. Figure 1 shows the network model. Each node represents a numerical model that can be replaced if an alternative is available. Also, it represents a local point in the overall validation strategy that starts at the component level and proceeds to the level of the aircraft integration. Each network model depends on a number of parameters or assumptions (indicated by dashed lines radiating from a node); the results inevitably depend on these assumptions. For example, in absence of detailed 2
3 data on the fan/duct acoustic liners, default data are assumed, which may not represent the actual airplane model. The combination of noise sources in the frequency and time domain is passed to another key node in the network: the long-range noise propagation model. This model takes into account the effects of stratified atmospheres, the presence of the ground and the actual ground characteristics. There are a number of noise shielding effects; these depend on the aircraft configuration. Important effects are: jet-by-jet shielding; engine/propeller noise shielded by the fuselage or the wing; engine noise shielded/diffracted by the wing s shear layer (or wake). These effects depend on the line of sight of the receiver and various other geometrical conditions. The use of an acoustic liner is a form of noise shielding. 2.2 Flight Mechanics Airplane trajectories are generated with the flight mechanics module. In brief, the module generates trajectories in the vertical plane for both arrival and departure and includes key aspects such a standard noise abatement departure profile (NADP) trajectories, steep approaches, displaced landings, etc. Alternatively, it is possible to use airplane-generated trajectories via pre-processing of FDR data packs. In this case, the global positioning system (GPS) coordinates are parsed and converted to a local reference system on the ground. The interface between the flight mechanics and the noise model consists of a time-dependent matrix containing over 20 parameters that define the airplane position, air-speed, configuration, engine state and atmospheric conditions at each point in the flight trajectory. A typical trajectory lasts 2 to 3 minutes, with a variable time-step of the order of 0.5 to 1.0 seconds. Changes in airplane configuration (high-lift system deployment and retraction; landing gear deployment and retraction) are considered instantaneous. The turbofan and turboprop airplanes are treated with separate methods. In the latter case, the airplane is trimmed to either required thrust or required power; corresponding thrust and power coefficients are determined for the propellers; the propellers are then trimmed to these specified conditions; net thrust or shaft power are calculated; the gas turbine engine is solved in inverse mode to determine the corresponding engine state, in particular the fuel flow, the temperatures and pressures across the engine [8-9]. 2.3 External Conditions External conditions incorporated into the prediction methods include the main atmospheric properties (air temperature, pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, wind direction, air turbulence level). Wind, turbulence and humidity are considered constant throughout the airfield. As mentioned, the flight trajectories are simulated, and may not correspond to the actual flight. However, if FDR-based trajectories are used, they must be synchronised with the noise measurements and with the airfield coordinates. Some discrepancies may arise, due to the sampling rate of the FDR. An example is shown in Figure 2, where the airplane appears to follow a jagged, rather than smooth, track on landing at Manchester airport. 3
4 Figure 2: Flight trajectories from Flight-Data Recorder on arrival at Manchester airport (ICAO: EGCC). 2.4 Outputs The output of the noise model includes instantaneous, integral noise metrics and some relevant extrema. In the first category, we have the sound pressure level (SPL) for all the noise sources, 1, :, in the frequency domain (limited to 1/3 octave band frequencies). Among the integral metrics, FLIGHT returns the effective perceived noise level (EPNL), the sound exposure level (SEL), the time-audible (TAUD), and the equivalent continuous noise level (LAeqT). Among the extreme value, the results include the maximum SPL, the A-corrected maximum SPL (LAmax), and the maximum perceived noise level (tone-corrected) PNLTM. The code issues detailed noise reports, as well as a noise breakdown over the full trajectory (see 5). All the output files contain metadata that allow a fair comparison between simulations. 3. NOISE MEASUREMENTS Aircraft noise measurement is an important activity for the validation of numerical prediction models. Furthermore, accurate measurements of different aircraft types form a database of information for tracking trends. However, measurement of aircraft noise footprints over large areas is often an impractical pursuit, requiring a large number of distributed microphones vulnerable to theft, damage or tamper. Typically, measurements are made using a single microphone positioned either under or to one side of the flight path, depending on data required (ISO or ICAO standards). 3.1 Flyover Noise Measurements Noise data from community microphones at major airports are not considered reliable for comparisons with numerical predictions. Most of these measurements are taken automatically with systems that are not monitored and are affected by inaccuracies, background noise and random events. Specific flyover noise measurements [10] are used for the validation of near-range predictions and represent crucial phases of flight where noise is often the paramount consideration of residents. To perform such measurements a data logger is attached to a microphone mounted horizontally on a tripod at a distance 1-2 m above the ground. Logging is started when an aircraft is seen to approach. Alternatively, a trigger level may be set such that a noise level above a set threshold automatically initiates logging. Instantaneous broadband and 1/3 octave band noise data, such as instantaneous unweighted and A- weighted sound pressure level (SPL), are recorded at a logging rate of 10Hz. Integral noise metrics such as SEL are computed throughout signal capture as well as time-averaged, A-weighted SPL (LAS) using an integration period of 1s. EPNL is computed from the data using the FLIGHT program as it cannot be computed by the sound level meter directly. Background noise levels are recorded 4
5 periodically by logging data for several minutes in the absence of aircraft overhead. Logging is terminated once the aircraft has receded such that the local SPL has dropped to background levels. 3.2 Measurement Campaigns A recent flyover noise measurement campaign was undertaken at Manchester (ICAO:EGCC), where data were gathered for 18 different aircraft types. Three aircraft in particular provided numerous measurements of uncontaminated data: B , A and the ATR72-200/-600. Results are presented for these aircraft types here. Throughout the campaign, a number of different measurement locations were used. These locations were chosen based on ease of access, centreline position and threshold distance and are illustrated in Figure 3. Figure 3: Microphone locations for flyover measurement campaign. Location 2 (red) is for departure, Locations 1,3,4 (green) are for arrival. 3.3 Measurements Results Landing and take-off measurements for the aircraft mentioned above are shown in Figure 4a-c. The associated measurement location is stated in the legend and appropriate background levels are indicated by the solid lines. Figure 4a: A arrival (left) and departure (right) measurements Figure 4b: ATR7 arrival (left) and departure (right) measurements 5
6 Figure 4c: B arrival (left) and departure (right) measurements Departure measurements exhibit a much larger spread than arrival measurements. This is attributed to variation in aircraft configuration and operational procedures during a take-off roll such as brakerelease gross weight and climb angle, engine and flap settings which may vary between operators. Arrival measurements are much more predictable with good coalescence of peak noise levels. In general, variations in noise level on approach are attributed to throttle and control surface adjustments during the final minute of final approach. In the case of the former, supporting evidence can be observed by listening to the recorded signals back through headphones. In Figure 4c a large peak can be seen between 20 and 30 seconds after the aircraft has passed for measurement 018. When heard back through headphones, this noise is characteristic of collapsing vortical flow structures [11] and is attributed to a particular strong tip vortex. 4. AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTIONS FLIGHT may be configured using known input data from the noise measurement campaign in order to predict flyover noise of aircraft. Examples are shown here for arrival/landing. Figure 5 shows the aircraft noise prediction and its comparison with the mean measured data at Manchester airport for an Airbus A powered by CFM56 turbofan engines. The measured data plotted are to be interpreted as mean data; the shaded area denotes one standard deviation above/below the mean value. It is noted how the comparison is close to the reference data, although in this instance the prediction fails to match the noise peak. For a reliable comparison, the time window should be 60 seconds (as shown), and the minimum noise level at least 40 db. Figure 5: Comparison between predictions and measurements for an Airbus A with CFM56 turbofan engines. 6
7 5. NOISE TOOLS FLIGHT can be coupled with a number of expanding numerical tools to adjust the prediction to specific airfields. Some of these tools are briefly discussed below. 5.1 Airfield Modelling The noise prediction models discussed in the previous sections can be used jointly with a realistic model of the airfield. The tools available to the software include: 1) determination of airfield maps; 2) association of ground impedance values at each ground receiver; 3) algorithms to estimate the ground reflection point of acoustic waves; 4) synchronisation of the airfield model with the simulated or measured flight trajectory; 5) algorithms for the determination of the travel path of reflected acoustic waves to the receiver through minor obstacles (trees, shrubs, low-level houses) and the corresponding acoustic effects; 6) partition of sub-zones for detailed noise calculation; 7) an algorithm to calculate the difference between noise footprints (e.g. calculated with two different noise propagation methods), swap travel direction, redefine grid resolution; 8) restart options (to be used in computationally demanding cases when job duration is limited). An example of airfield modelling using this tool is shown in Figure 6. This result refers to London Heathrow (ICAO: EGLL). The colours at the airfield indicate ground impedance value. A synchronised arrival trajectory is shown, with landing from the East on runway 09L/27R. The top plane shows an instantaneous noise map with iso-noise levels (the centre of gravity of the aircraft is represented by a large black dot). Figure 7 shows a detailed noise map over the region surrounding the landing point. Figure 6: Airfield model of London Heathrow (LHR), with a synchronised trajectory (Boeing B ) on arrival, and instantaneous noise levels (top plane). 7
8 Figure 7: Simulated noise map of a Boeing B landing on runway 09L/27R at London Heathrow (case of Figure 6). Another example of simulation is shown in Figure 8, where we display the effects of extended runways. In this example, the length of the runway has been doubled to 6,000 m, take-off and landings are displaced by 3,000 m. Figure 8: Effects of displaced take-off and landings on noise maps on a single extended runway. Data plotted are EPNL. 5.2 Stochastic Effects As anticipated, the aircraft itself and the external environment are rarely fully specified, or even known with sufficient precision. In order to establish the role of these uncertainties, an additional tool is included in the noise prediction program to deal with uncertain environments. Multidimensional response surfaces are generated, some with random changes of key parameters, before producing a set of noise predictions which are then analysed with statistical methods. Stochastic changes with pre-defined margins are introduced to about 50 system parameters in six categories: airframe geometry, engine geometry, engine s operational conditions, atmospheric parameters, ground parameters, airplane position with respect to a fixed ground receiver. Results may therefore be expressed within a particular confidence interval. 5.3 Trajectory Optimisation The flight trajectory can be parametrised in order to seek environmental optima, such as minimum noise level subject to minimum landing and take-off (LTO) emissions. Mathematical details of this approach are presented in a separate study. In brief, the flight trajectories are made to depend on a limited number of key parameters; an object function is selected to minimise emissions; and an external optimiser (neural network or non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA) is coupled via an interface to generate new solution vectors. Optimal solutions are then evaluated from a Pareto frontier. Among the free parameters on arrival, this solution gives us the optimal point of landing gear deployment, the delay in the flap deployment, the sequence of flap deployments, the glide slope of the trajectory and the touch-down point. 8
9 6. CRITICAL DISCUSSION Unlike other tools for engineering simulation, aircraft noise programs are still at their infancy; their accuracy and consistency is still below expectations. However, there is a fundamental aspect that must be clarified: the simulation platform (e.g. the airplane and the external conditions) are not fully specified; the quality of the noise measurements is not at a level of consistency as one would have in fully controlled (and repeatable) laboratory conditions. Therefore, we face the difficulty of matching noise measurements (themselves affected by stochastic effects), with imprecise knowledge of the airplane system. The latter problem forces us to use low-order simulation models. In this instance, low-order methods must rely on a limited number of parameters. They offer some degree of confidence within the limits of their scope, but fail outside recognised bounds. There cannot be generality in methods that rely on some form of empiricism. The analysis of aircraft noise relies to a great extent on a systematic approach. In this framework, we have the opportunity to study multiple effects and their magnitude; hence, we can direct our efforts toward those airplane components that contribute most to the overall noise signature. Validation of aircraft noise prediction models is difficult due to the impracticalities of collecting reliable aircraft noise measurements in a real-world setting. The distribution of large unmanned microphone arrays requires permission to be granted for their placement and retrieval, with the possibility of locations being less than ideal, especially if the airport is situated in urbanised environments. These difficulties, amongst others, are the main reason suitable quantities of this kind of data simply do not exist. Noise footprints are a useful tool for quantifying noise impact over large areas, but validation of mid- to long-range prediction using microphone data is unlikely. Whilst speed of calculation may be a concern, it is believed that accuracy of predictions is of primary importance. In the past there has been too much emphasis on the speed of calculation, which has probably shifted the efforts toward less robust models. It is recognised that speed of calculation becomes a major challenge when considering noise footprints and multiple airplane movements and hence for methods to be considered practical there must be balance between computational effort and accuracy. There is a gap in knowledge in the area between accurate field methods (CFD and aero-acoustics) and empirical methods. This middle area, is the place for low-order methods, but must be developed in order to improve predictions for the applications discussed in this paper. Various technology forecasts indicate that a large number of current-generation airplanes will be replaced; strong growth is predicted within 20 years from today, with growth coming from more advanced technologies, that we are presently unable to model. 7. CONCLUSIONS Progress has been achieved in the numerical prediction of aircraft noise at a practical level. A software tool has been developed, and continues to be improved, for application to the current generation of commercial aircraft powered by gas turbine engines. Several features have been implemented and briefly described in this paper. Validation and verification is carried out at several levels, starting from the component level, ultimately leading to a comparison of simulated flyover trajectories with noise measurements at the airfield. Multiple noise metrics are produced (instantaneous, integral, peak values) for a full evaluation of the effects of community noise. At present, only known configurations can be modelled. Further work is required in a number of areas to allow insight into the contribution of alternative configurations and novel geometries. 9
10 There is still a lack of comparison between the different aircraft simulation methods developed in recent years (with very few exceptions); it is likely that the difference in predictions are important. This is deemed as an important area of research in the coming years. Acknowledgments The Author wishes to acknowledge the contribution of the EU CleanSky Systems for Green Operations, Grant Agreement , to the development of this software tool. Further information of the FLIGHT computer program is available online: References 1. Hileman J, Spakovszky Z, Drela M, Sargeant, M. Airframe Design for "Silent Aircraft", 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA , Reno NV, January Boeker E, Dinges E, He B, Fleming G, Roof C, Gerbi P, Rapoza A, Hemann J. Integrated Noise Model, Version 7.0, FAA-AEE-08-01, FAA, January Ollerhead J, Rhodes D, Viinikainen M, Monkman D, Woodley A. The UK Civil Aircraft Noise Contour Model ANCON: Improvements in Version 2, R&D 9842, ERDC Dept. CAA, Gatwick Airport Lopes L and Burley C. Design of the Next Generation Aircraft Noise Prediction Program ANOPP2, 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA , Portland OR, June Filippone A. Cruise Altitude Flexibility of Jet Transport Aircraft. Aerospace Science & Technology, 14, pp , DOI: /j.ast Filippone A. Aircraft Noise Prediction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 68, pp , March DOI: /j.paerosci Filippone A. Advanced Aircraft Flight Performance, Cambridge Univ. Press, Filippone A. & Mohamed-Kassim Z. Multi-Disciplinary Simulation of Propeller-Turboprop Aircraft Flight. Aeronautical J., 116(1184), October Filippone, A. Theoretical Framework for the Simulation of Transport Aircraft Flight. J. Aircraft, 47 (5) pp , September DOI: /1.C Filippone A. & Harwood A. Flyover Noise Measurements and Predictions of Commercial Airplanes, Journal of Aircraft, 53(2), pp , DOI: /1.C Alix D, Simich P, Wassaf H, Wang F. Acoustic Characterization of Wake Vortices In-Ground-Effect, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA , Reno NV, January
Fly-over noise measurements and simulation for a turboprop aircraft
Fly-over noise measurements and simulation for a turboprop aircraft Richard Hughes 1, and Antonio Filippone 2 1, 2 School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester,
More informationMEASURED ENGINE INSTALLATION EFFECTS OF FOUR CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRPLANES
Portland, Maine NOISE-CON 200 200 October 2 MEASURED ENGINE INSTALLATION EFFECTS OF FOUR CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRPLANES David A. Senzig Senzig Engineering Everett Street Boston, MA 020 Gregg G. Fleming Volpe
More informationProblems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation
Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2006 20-22 November 2006, Christchurch, New Zealand Problems with the INM: Part 2 Atmospheric Attenuation Steven Cooper, John Maung The Acoustic Group, Sydney, Australia ABSTRACT
More informationAn experimental evaluation of a new approach to aircraft noise modelling
An experimental evaluation of a new approach to aircraft noise modelling F. De Roo and E. Salomons TNO Science and Industry, Stieljesweg 1, 2628CK Delft, Netherlands foort.deroo@tno.nl 903 Common engineering
More informationNoise Certification Workshop
Session2: EPNdB Metric Why is it used in Aircraft Noise Certification? How is it calculated? Alain DEPITRE DGAC - FRANCE Bangkok, 6 to 7 November 2006 1 Human hearing system response The human hearing
More informationAIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION IN THE IESTA PROGRAM
AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION IN THE IESTA PROGRAM P. Malbéqui, Y. Rozenberg and J. Bulté ONERA, BP-72, 29 avenue de la Division Leclerc, 92322 Châtillon Cedex, France ABSTRACT The aim of the IESTA program
More informationA comparing overview on ECAC Doc.29 3 rd Edition and the new German AzB
A comparing overview on ECAC Doc.29 3 rd Edition and the new German AzB Dr. Ullrich Isermann German Aerospace Center DLR Institute of Aerodynamics und Flow Technology JRC Workshop on Aircraft Noise, Brussels,
More informationNINHA: Noise Impact of aircraft with Novel engine configurations in mid- to High Altitude operations
NINHA: Noise Impact of aircraft with Novel engine configurations in mid- to High Altitude operations Nico VAN OOSTEN 1 ; Dominique COLLIN 2 1 Anotec Engineering, Spain 2 Snecma, France ABSTRACT The potential
More informationProblems with the INM: Part 1 Lateral Attenuation
Problems with the INM: Part 1 Lateral Attenuation Steven Cooper The Acoustic Group. Sydney, Australia ABSTRACT Validation of INM predictions finds agreement when the monitoring position is close to or
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 7.2 MICROPHONE ARRAY
More informationAuralization of novel aircraft configurations
Auralization of novel aircraft configurations Michael Arntzen 1, Lothar Bertsch 2, and Dick G. Simons 3 1 Research engineer, NLR, Anthony Fokkerweg 2, 1059 CM Amsterdam, The Netherlands (part-time assistant
More informationOverview of Turbofan Engine Noise
Overview of Turbofan Engine Noise Oksana Stalnov Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Technion Israel Institute of Technology Some statistics Current aircraft are 20-30 db quieter than first generation turbofans
More informationA Method for Estimating Noise from Full-Scale Distributed Exhaust Nozzles
A Method for Estimating Noise from Full-Scale Distributed Exhaust Nozzles Kevin W. Kinzie * NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681 David. B. Schein Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems, El Segundo,
More informationSource localisation on aircraft in flight - new measurements with the DLR research aircraft Airbus 320 ATRA
BeBeC-2018-D01 Source localisation on aircraft in flight - new measurements with the DLR research aircraft Airbus 320 ATRA Henri Siller, Wolfram Hage, Timo Schumacher DLR Institute of Propulsion Technology,
More informationCORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009)
CORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009) The Director of Civil Aviation has, in terms of section 163(1) of the Civil Aviation Act, 2009 (Act
More informationFlight Demonstration of the Separation Analysis Methodology for Continuous Descent Arrival
Flight Demonstration of the Separation Analysis Methodology for Continuous Descent Arrival Liling Ren & John-Paul B. Clarke Air Transportation Laboratory School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute
More informationPortable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority
Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver Vancouver Airport Authority September 27, 2016 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 OBJECTIVES... 2 VANCOUVER: AIRCRAFT
More informationNoise attenuation directly under the flight path in varying atmospheric conditions
Noise attenuation directly under the flight path in varying atmospheric conditions S.J. Hebly 1, V. Sindhamani 2, M. Arntzen 1,2, D.H.T. Bergmans 1, and D.G. Simons 2 1 National Aerospace Laboratory Environment
More informationFrom (CTS) wind tunnel data to noise impact assessment
From (CTS) wind tunnel data to noise impact assessment Mark-Jan van der Meulen, Harry Brouwer, Marthijn Tuinstra & Kylie Knepper CEAS-ASC workshop 2018 Introduction Current best practice: Aerodynamic test
More informationCity and Borough of Juneau
City and Borough of Juneau Flightseeing Noise Measurement and Assessment Study Proposed Work Plan BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVES The objective of the flightseeing noise measurement program is to provide
More informationChapter 2 Channel Equalization
Chapter 2 Channel Equalization 2.1 Introduction In wireless communication systems signal experiences distortion due to fading [17]. As signal propagates, it follows multiple paths between transmitter and
More informationTheoretical Aircraft Overflight Sound Peak Shape
Theoretical Aircraft Overflight Sound Peak Shape Introduction and Overview This report summarizes work to characterize an analytical model of aircraft overflight noise peak shapes which matches well with
More informationNASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program Jay Dryer Director, Fundamental Aeronautics Program Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program Jay Dryer Director, Fundamental Aeronautics Program Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate www.nasa.gov July 2012 NASA
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 1996-2 Second edition 2007-03-15 Acoustics Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise Part 2: Determination of environmental noise levels Acoustique Description,
More informationINVESTIGATIONS ON SLAT NOISE REDUCTION TECH- NOLOGIES BASED ON PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIAL, PART II: CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN AND WIND TUNNEL TEST
INVESTIGATIONS ON SLAT NOISE REDUCTION TECH- NOLOGIES BASED ON PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIAL, PART II: CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN AND WIND TUNNEL TEST Song Xiao, Yu Jinhai, Breard Cyrille and Sun Yifeng Shanghai Aircraft
More informationRadar/Lidar Sensors SESAR XP1 Trials at CDG airport WakeNet-USA October 2012 Boeing, Seattle, USA
www.thalesgroup.com Radar/Lidar Sensors SESAR XP1 Trials at CDG airport WakeNet-USA 17-18 October 2012 Boeing, Seattle, USA 2 / Agenda SESAR P12.2.2 overview Organization Development plan Planning and
More informationREPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012
Date: 25 July 2013 Ref: REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012 Client: Gatwick Airport Limited Report Author :... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant Approved by :. A.V.H.
More informationFundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC
Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC Dr. Colin Novak Akoustik Engineering Limited April 03, 2013 Akoustik Engineering Limited Akoustik Engineering Limited is the sales and technical representative
More informationNoise monitoring report
Noise monitoring report January - June 2018 Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 4 General Statistics 5 Noise Monitoring Statistics 8 NMT 1: Bay Lane 10 NMT 2: St. Doolaghs 14 NMT 4: Feltrim 18 NMT
More informationSUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011
Date: 9 June 2012 Ref: SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011 Client: Gatwick Airport Limited Report Author :... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant Approved by
More informationAcoustic Signature of an Unmanned Air Vehicle - Exploitation for Aircraft Localisation and Parameter Estimation
Acoustic Signature of an Unmanned Air Vehicle - Exploitation for Aircraft Localisation and Parameter Estimation S. Sadasivan, M. Gurubasavaraj and S. Ravi Sekar Aeronautical Development Establishment,
More informationACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia
ICSV14 Cairns Australia 9-12 July, 2007 ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE Ruisen Ming SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia Roy.Ming@svt.com.au Abstract In this paper, an acoustic
More informationREPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL
Date: 09 March 2016 REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL Client: Edinburgh Limited Report Author:... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant
More informationEffects of science-based noise control laws, standards and policies
Effects of science-based noise control laws, standards and policies Wayne R. Lundberg * Aerospace Engineer, 3312 Braddock St., Kettering OH 45420-1203, USA *corresponding author: e-mail: wayne29rl@gmail.com
More informationAircraft Noise Monitoring Data from Noise Monitoring Terminals (NMTs)
Aircraft Noise Monitoring Data from Noise Monitoring Terminals (NMTs) Contents Introduction to Noise and Noise Metrics Determining Aircraft Noise Dublin Noise and Flight Track Monitoring System (NFTMS)
More informationIS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD IS0 9613-2 First edition 1996-I 2-l 5 Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation Acoustique -Attenuation du son lors de
More informationECAC.CEAC Doc th Edition. Volume 3, Part 1 - Reference Cases and Verification Framework
EUROPEAN CIVIL CONFERENCE EUROPEENNE AVIATION CONFERENCE DE L AVIATION CIVILE Tel : +33 1 46 41 85 44 Fax : +33 1 46 24 18 18 SECRETARIAT 3 bis, Villa Emile Bergaret 9522 Neuilly-sur-Seine Cédex FRANCE
More informationDECENTRALISED ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL USING A REMOTE SENSING STRATEGY
DECENTRALISED ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL USING A REMOTE SENSING STRATEGY Joseph Milton University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Highfield, Southampton, UK email: jm3g13@soton.ac.uk
More informationTURNEX. Turbomachinery noise radiation through the jet exhaust. January December Partners, 4.7 Million Euro
Turbomachinery noise radiation through the jet exhaust January 2005 - December 2007 12 Partners, 4.7 Million Euro Brian J Tester, TURNEX Co-ordinator, ISVR, Southampton University Daniel Chiron, EC Project
More informationOur noise modelling using INM. May 2015
Our noise modelling using INM May 2015 INM model developed to reflect operating characteristics of Heathrow. Our process adopts a similar approach to CAA using ANCON. Our INM model is set up to reflect
More informationREPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012
Date: 25 June 2012 Ref: REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012 Client: Gatwick Airport Limited Report Author :... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant Approved by :. A.V.H. Holdich
More informationSUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011
Date: 24 June 2012 Ref: 00148/Felbridge/002/rp SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011 Client: Gatwick Airport Limited Report Author :... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant
More informationSAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES. Noise Classification of Aircrafts using Artificial Neural Networks
SAE TECHNICAL 22-36-62 PAPER SERIES E Noise Classification of Aircrafts using Artificial Neural Networks Alejandro Osses Ismael Gómez Max Glisser Christian Gerard Ricardo Guzmán 22-36-62 Noise Classification
More informationNotice of aeronautical radar coordination. Coordination procedure for air traffic control radar - notice issued to 3.
Coordination procedure for air traffic control radar - notice issued to 3.4 GHz Licensees Publication Date: 12 April 2018 Contents Section 1. Introduction 1 2. The procedure 3 1. Introduction 1.1 This
More informationComposite aeroacoustic beamforming of an axial fan
Acoustics Array Systems: Paper ICA2016-122 Composite aeroacoustic beamforming of an axial fan Jeoffrey Fischer (a), Con Doolan (b) (a) School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, UNSW Australia,
More informationEDITORIAL NEWSLETTER WINTER 2009/2010. Dear colleague,
http://www.xnoise.eu EDITORIAL NEWSLETTER WINTER 2009/2010 Dear colleague, Contents Welcome to our third newsletter. Please forward to your colleagues to encourage their participation in the X3-Noise Network
More informationPre- and Post Ringing Of Impulse Response
Pre- and Post Ringing Of Impulse Response Source: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-xx/help/373398b-01/svaconcepts/svtimemask/ Time (Temporal) Masking.Simultaneous masking describes the effect when the masked
More informationFAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents
FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Contents Contents Illustrations Tables Appendices Contents Noise Compatibility Program Checklist Noise Exposure Map Checklist i vi viii ix x xv Chapter A INVENTORY
More informationMICROPHONE ARRAY MEASUREMENTS ON AEROACOUSTIC SOURCES
MICROPHONE ARRAY MEASUREMENTS ON AEROACOUSTIC SOURCES Andreas Zeibig 1, Christian Schulze 2,3, Ennes Sarradj 2 und Michael Beitelschmidt 1 1 TU Dresden, Institut für Bahnfahrzeuge und Bahntechnik, Fakultät
More informationSaab Aerosystems AB: Per Våtz. Title: Exterior noise measurements of Gripen NG demonstrator SUMMARY
Utfärdare (tj-st-bet, namn)/ssued by Telefon/Phone Datum/Date Utgåva/ssue Sida/Page Lennart Ericsson +46 13 70609 2008-11-21 1 1 (17) Niklas Österström +46 13 290365 nfoklass/nfo. class Saab Aerosystems
More informationWelcome & Introductions
Airport Community Noise Consultative Committee Calgary Airport Authority October 15, 2009 Welcome & Introductions Agenda Review of May 28, 2009 Minutes 2009 Semi-annual Noise Report Managing Noise Calls
More informationEffect of wind speed and wind direction on amplitude modulation of wind turbine noise. Thileepan PAULRAJ1; Petri VÄLISUO2;
Effect of wind speed and wind direction on amplitude modulation of wind turbine noise Thileepan PAULRAJ1; Petri VÄLISUO2; 1,2 University of Vaasa, Finland ABSTRACT Amplitude modulation of wind turbine
More informationLiddell Coal Operations
Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring February 2018 Prepared for Liddell Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring February 2018 Reference:
More informationSESAR Wake vortex measurements by radar. First results of the campaign
SESAR Wake vortex measurements by radar. First results of the 2014-2015 campaign Ph. Juge Previous campaigns in SESAR P12.02.02 XP0 : 2011 2 months Main Objective Define the adequate set of needed sensors
More informationALLEGRA Project ADVANCED LOW NOISE LANDING (MAIN
ALLEGRA Project ADVANCED LOW NOISE LANDING (MAIN AND NOSE) GEAR FOR REGIONAL AIRCRAFT GRANT AGREEMENT NO: 308225 ALLEGRA Consortium www.cleansky.eu EUROTECH s EUROTECH s.a.s. Project Overview Call SP1-JTI-CS-2011-03
More informationREPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT LEIGH SEPTEMBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012
Date: 25 July 2013 Ref: REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT LEIGH SEPTEMBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012 Client: Gatwick Airport Limited Report Author :... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant Approved by :. A.V.H. Holdich
More informationPlease refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields.
Defining Sound s Near The near field is the region close to a sound source usually defined as ¼ of the longest wave-length of the source. Near field noise levels are characterized by drastic fluctuations
More informationSimulation and design of a microphone array for beamforming on a moving acoustic source
Simulation and design of a microphone array for beamforming on a moving acoustic source Dick Petersen and Carl Howard School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
More informationRec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *
Rec. ITU-R P.682-1 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.682-1 * PROPAGATION DATA REQUIRED FOR THE DESIGN OF EARTH-SPACE AERONAUTICAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (Question ITU-R 207/3) Rec. 682-1 (1990-1992) The
More informationAn overview of recent research on AM and OAM of wind turbine noise
An overview of recent research on AM and OAM of wind turbine noise Helge Aagaard Madsen Franck Bertagnolio Andreas Fischer DTU Wind Energy Technical University of Denmark P.O. 49, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
More informationTutorial on the Statistical Basis of ACE-PT Inc. s Proficiency Testing Schemes
Tutorial on the Statistical Basis of ACE-PT Inc. s Proficiency Testing Schemes Note: For the benefit of those who are not familiar with details of ISO 13528:2015 and with the underlying statistical principles
More informationDevelopment of a rating procedure for low frequency noise: results of measurements near runways
Development of a rating procedure for low frequency noise: results of measurements near runways Edwin Buikema1, Martijn Vercammen1, Fokke van der Ploeg1, Jan Granneman1, Joos Vos2 1 Peutz bv, The Netherlands
More informationPresented on. Mehul Supawala Marine Energy Sources Product Champion, WesternGeco
Presented on Marine seismic acquisition and its potential impact on marine life has been a widely discussed topic and of interest to many. As scientific knowledge improves and operational criteria evolve,
More information19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 VIRTUAL AUDIO REPRODUCED IN A HEADREST
19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 VIRTUAL AUDIO REPRODUCED IN A HEADREST PACS: 43.25.Lj M.Jones, S.J.Elliott, T.Takeuchi, J.Beer Institute of Sound and Vibration Research;
More informationDevelopment of a sonic boom measurement system at JAXA
Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference 23-27 April 2012, Nantes, France Development of a sonic boom measurement system at JAXA K. Veggeberg National Instruments, 11500 N. Mopac C, Austin,
More informationMETHODOLOGY FOR VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION CALCULATION ACCORDING TO ISO STANDARD
METHODOLOGY FOR VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE FOR NOISE ATTENUATION CALCULATION ACCORDING TO ISO 9613-2 STANDARD Jelena Tomić, Slobodan Todosijević, Nebojša Bogojević, Zlatan Šoškić Faculty of Mechanical and
More informationHigh Resolution W-Band Radar Detection and Characterization of Aircraft Wake Vortices in Precipitation. Thomas A. Seliga and James B.
High Resolution W-Band Radar Detection and Characterization of Aircraft Wake Vortices in Precipitation Thomas A. Seliga and James B. Mead 4L 4R 4L/22R 4R/22L W-Band Radar Site The W-Band Radar System
More informationInvestigation of Noise Spectrum Characteristics for an Evaluation of Railway Noise Barriers
IJR International Journal of Railway Vol. 6, No. 3 / September 2013, pp. 125-130 ISSN 1976-9067(Print) ISSN 2288-3010(Online) Investigation of Noise Spectrum Characteristics for an Evaluation of Railway
More informationAn MDAO Perspective. Dr. Rubén Del Rosario, Principal Investigator Subsonic Fixed Wing Project Fundamental Aeronautics Program
National Aeronautics and Space Administration An MDAO Perspective Dr. Rubén Del Rosario, Principal Investigator Subsonic Fixed Wing Project Fundamental Aeronautics Program National Science Foundation Workshop
More informationThe Active Flutter Suppression (AFS) Technology Evaluation Project
1 The Active Flutter Suppression (AFS) Technology Evaluation Project Eli Livne, Ph.D. The William E. Boeing Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics University of Washington, Seattle, WA eli@aa.washington.edu
More informationEngine Installation Effects of Four Civil Transport Airplanes: Wallops Flight Facility Study
NASA/TM-003-1433 Engine Installation Effects of Four Civil Transport Airplanes: Wallops Flight Facility Study Gregg G. Fleming U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems
More informationSmall craft -Measurement of sound pressure level of airborne sound emitted by powered recreational craft
Small craft -Measurement of sound pressure level of airborne sound emitted by powered recreational craft Introduction This Standard describes the method for determining the pass by sound level emitted
More informationPipeline Blowdown Noise Levels
Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels James Boland 1, Henrik Malker 2, Benjamin Hinze 3 1 SLR Consulting, Acoustics and Vibration, Brisbane, Australia 2 Atkins Global, Acoustics, London, United Kingdom 3 SLR
More informationTigerShark UAS Level Flyover Noise Measurements
TigerShark UAS Level Flyover Noise Measurements Final 18 July 216 Adrian Sescu, Calvin Walker, Ratan Jha Mississippi State University Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Environment
More informationINTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2016 QUARTERLY REPORT
INTEGRITY AND CONTINUITY ANALYSIS FROM GPS JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2016 QUARTERLY REPORT Name Responsibility Date Signature Prepared by M Pattinson (NSL) 07/10/16 Checked by L Banfield (NSL) 07/10/16 Authorised
More informationAcoustic Based Angle-Of-Arrival Estimation in the Presence of Interference
Acoustic Based Angle-Of-Arrival Estimation in the Presence of Interference Abstract Before radar systems gained widespread use, passive sound-detection based systems were employed in Great Britain to detect
More informationPhased Array Velocity Sensor Operational Advantages and Data Analysis
Phased Array Velocity Sensor Operational Advantages and Data Analysis Matt Burdyny, Omer Poroy and Dr. Peter Spain Abstract - In recent years the underwater navigation industry has expanded into more diverse
More informationDOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT
Tel: 43-232-6771 Fax: 43-232-6762 RWDI AIR Inc. #1, 736-8 th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 1H4 Email: solutions@rwdi.com DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT Introduction This report
More informationReducing comb filtering on different musical instruments using time delay estimation
Reducing comb filtering on different musical instruments using time delay estimation Alice Clifford and Josh Reiss Queen Mary, University of London alice.clifford@eecs.qmul.ac.uk Abstract Comb filtering
More informationCHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS
CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS While a great deal is known about aircraft noise, the methods used to calculate noise exposure can be difficult to understand. Determining aircraft noise impacts involves logarithmic
More informationWhat applications is a cardioid subwoofer configuration appropriate for?
SETTING UP A CARDIOID SUBWOOFER SYSTEM Joan La Roda DAS Audio, Engineering Department. Introduction In general, we say that a speaker, or a group of speakers, radiates with a cardioid pattern when it radiates
More informationResponse to the London City Airport Noise Action Plan By Plane Hell Action
Response to the London City Airport Noise Action Plan 2018 2023 By Plane Hell Action There is an immediate need to point out that this NAP does not include overflight of the wider SE London area that occurs
More informationScan-based near-field acoustical holography on rocket noise
Scan-based near-field acoustical holography on rocket noise Michael D. Gardner N283 ESC Provo, UT 84602 Scan-based near-field acoustical holography (NAH) shows promise in characterizing rocket noise source
More informationAutonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation.
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation. We are aware that electromagnetic energy cannot propagate appreciable distances in the ocean except at very low frequencies. As a result, GPS-based and other such
More informationMEASURING SOUND INSULATION OF BUILDING FAÇADES: INTERFERENCE EFFECTS, AND REPRODUCIBILITY
MEASURING SOUND INSULATION OF BUILDING FAÇADES: INTERFERENCE EFFECTS, AND REPRODUCIBILITY U. Berardi, E. Cirillo, F. Martellotta Dipartimento di Architettura ed Urbanistica - Politecnico di Bari, via Orabona
More informationNotice of coordination procedure required under spectrum access licences for the 2.6 GHz band
Notice of coordination procedure required under spectrum access licences for the 2.6 GHz band Coordination with aeronautical radionavigation radar in the 2.7 GHz band Notice Publication date: 1 March 2013
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE MORPHING FLAP AS A LOW NOISE HIGH LIFT DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT WING
28 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE MORPHING FLAP AS A LOW NOISE HIGH LIFT DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT WING Yasuhiro TANI*, Yoshiyuki MATSUDA*, Akira DOI*, Yuya
More informationCOMPARISON OF DUCTED AND UNDUCTED COUNTER ROTATING FAN MODEL NOISE
COMPARISON OF DUCTED AND UNDUCTED COUNTER ROTATING FAN MODEL NOISE Yuri Khaletskiy, Victor Mileshin* *CIAM, 2, Aviamotornaya str. 111116, Moscow, Russia Keywords: noise, counter rotating fan, open rotor,
More informationRemoval of Continuous Extraneous Noise from Exceedance Levels. Hugall, B (1), Brown, R (2), and Mee, D J (3)
ABSTRACT Removal of Continuous Extraneous Noise from Exceedance Levels Hugall, B (1), Brown, R (2), and Mee, D J (3) (1) School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,
More informationReliability of aircraft noise evaluation by measurement for comparison with prediction
Reliability of aircraft noise evaluation by measurement for comparison with prediction Naoaki Shinohara 1 ; Ichiro Yamada 2 1 Narita International Airport Promotion Foundation, JAPAN 2 Aviation Environment
More informationChapter 5. Signal Analysis. 5.1 Denoising fiber optic sensor signal
Chapter 5 Signal Analysis 5.1 Denoising fiber optic sensor signal We first perform wavelet-based denoising on fiber optic sensor signals. Examine the fiber optic signal data (see Appendix B). Across all
More informationDESIGN OF ROOMS FOR MULTICHANNEL AUDIO MONITORING
DESIGN OF ROOMS FOR MULTICHANNEL AUDIO MONITORING A.VARLA, A. MÄKIVIRTA, I. MARTIKAINEN, M. PILCHNER 1, R. SCHOUSTAL 1, C. ANET Genelec OY, Finland genelec@genelec.com 1 Pilchner Schoustal Inc, Canada
More informationBEAMFORMING AND DECONVOLUTION FOR AERODYNAMIC SOUND SOURCES IN MOTION
BEAMFORMING AND DECONVOLUTION FOR AERODYNAMIC SOUND SOURCES IN MOTION Sébastien Guérin, Christian Weckmüller, Ulf Michel Deutches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Müller-Breslau-Str. 8, 10623, Berlin, Germany
More informationDTT COVERAGE PREDICTIONS AND MEASUREMENT
DTT COVERAGE PREDICTIONS AND MEASUREMENT I. R. Pullen Introduction Digital terrestrial television services began in the UK in November 1998. Unlike previous analogue services, the planning of digital television
More informationNOVEL ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION
NOVEL ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION RHYS PULLIN, MATTHEW BAXTER, MARK EATON, KAREN HOLFORD and SAM EVANS Cardiff School of Engineering, The Parade, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK Abstract Source
More informationEVALUATING VISUALIZATION MODES FOR CLOSELY-SPACED PARALLEL APPROACHES
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 49th ANNUAL MEETING 2005 35 EVALUATING VISUALIZATION MODES FOR CLOSELY-SPACED PARALLEL APPROACHES Ronald Azuma, Jason Fox HRL Laboratories, LLC Malibu,
More informationCOMBINING SIGNAL PRE-PROCESSING METHODS WITH BEAMFORMING FOR BROADBAND TURBOMACHINERY APPLICATIONS
BeBeC-2018-D28 COMBINING SIGNAL PRE-PROCESSING METHODS WITH BEAMFORMING FOR BROADBAND TURBOMACHINERY APPLICATIONS Kristóf Tokaji and Csaba Horváth Department of Fluid Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
More informationQuestions and Answers
EKS Technology Development Program EKR-DT Process Process Optimisation Program COSIA Presentation Questions and Answers May 30, 2017 This document addresses some of outstanding questions that are related
More informationMULTIPLEX Foundational Research on MULTIlevel complex networks and systems
MULTIPLEX Foundational Research on MULTIlevel complex networks and systems Guido Caldarelli IMT Alti Studi Lucca node leaders Other (not all!) Colleagues The Science of Complex Systems is regarded as
More informationinter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE
1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 2.3 LOW-FREQUENCY PROJECTILE NOISE FROM FLAT HOWITZER
More information