Enclosed is the EMC test report for compliance testing of the Infinera, Cloud Xpress (CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx), tested to the requirements of:

Transcription

1 MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND PHONE (410) FAX (410) WESTERN AVENUE UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA PHONE (510) FAX (510) BELICK STREET SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA PHONE (408) FAX (510) MCCALLEN PASS AUSTIN, TEXAS PHONE (512) FAX (512) April 6, 2017 Infinera 169 West Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA Dear Wale Aderemi, Enclosed is the EMC test report for compliance testing of the Infinera, Cloud Xpress (CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx), tested to the requirements of: Emission Tests: EN 55032:2012/AC:2013; CISPR 32: 2012; Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013; FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014); Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016; VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE); and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) for a Class A Device Immunity Test: EN 55024: 2010; CISPR 24: 2010; and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) Thank you for using the services of MET Laboratories, Inc. If you have any questions regarding these results or if MET can be of further service to you, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, MET LABORATORIES, INC. Angelina Red Documentation Department Reference: (\Infinera\EMCU93869-Global) Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of MET Laboratories, Inc. While use of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) letters, the NVLAP Logo, or the A2LA logo in this report reflects MET accreditation under these programs, the report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or A2LA, or any agency of the Federal Government. This letter of transmittal is not a part of the attached report. The Nation s First Licensed Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory

2 MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND PHONE (410) FAX (410) WESTERN AVENUE UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA PHONE (510) FAX (510) BELICK STREET SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA PHONE (408) FAX (510) MCCALLEN PASS AUSTIN, TEXAS PHONE (512) FAX (512) for the Infinera Tested under EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE), and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) for a Class A Device and EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010, and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) MET Report: EMCU93869-Global April 6, 2017 Prepared for: Infinera 169 West Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA Prepared by: MET Laboratories, Inc Western Avenue Union City, CA MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page i of vii

3 For the Infinera Tested under EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), Industry Canada ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE), and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) for a Class A Device and EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010, and ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) MET Report: EMCU93869-Global Joe Vang Project Engineer, Lab Angelina Red Documentation Department Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the applicable limits. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements per Test Summary (Section 1.0). Asad Bajwa Director, Lab MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page ii of vii

4 Report Status Sheet Report Status Revision Report Date Reason for Revision Ø April 6, 2017 Initial Issue. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iii of vii

5 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Testing Summary Emissions Test Summary Immunity Test Summary Equipment Configuration Overview References for VCCI Test Site Measurement Uncertainty Detailed EUT Description and Test Setup Description of Test Sample Photograph(s) of Test Sample Block Diagram Equipment Configuration Support Equipment Ports and Cabling Information Mode of Operation & Method of Monitoring EUT Operation Overall Immunity Performance Criteria Modifications to EUT Test Software Used Disposition of EUT Emission Criteria Limits for Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals Limits for Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port Limits for Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports Radiated Emission: Limits of Electromagnetic Radiation Disturbance Harmonic Current Emissions Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker) Immunity Criteria Electrostatic Discharge Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Surge Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions FCC Part 15 Subpart B Compliance Information Verification Information Label and User s Manual Information ICES-003 Procedural & Labeling Requirements MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page iv of vii

6 List of Tables Table of Contents Table 1: Uncertainty Calculations Summary... 7 Table 2. Equipment Configuration Table 3. Support Equipment Table 4. Ports and Cabling Information Table 5. Conducted Emissions - AC Voltage (CE-V) limits Annex A of EN Table 6. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Table 7. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Table 8. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Table 9. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Table 10. CE Voltage - (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Table 11. CE Voltage - (110 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Table 12. CE Voltage Test Equipment List Table 13. Mains Terminal Disturbance Voltage limits Annex A of EN Table 14. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Test Results Table 15. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Test Results Table 16. CE Voltage DC Power Port Test Equipment List Table 17. Limits of Conducted Common Mode (Asymmetric Mode) Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports per Annex A of EN Class A Table 18. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Test Results Table 19. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Test Results Table 20. CE Telecom Ports Test Equipment List Table 21. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Below 1 GHz Table 22. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Above 1 GHz Table 23. Radiated Emissions Limits calculated per FCC Part 15, (a) (b) and ICES Table 24. RE AC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Table 25. RE AC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Table 26. RE AC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Table 27. RE DC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Table 28. RE DC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Table 29. RE DC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Table 30. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Table 31. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz) Test Results Table 32. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Table 33. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Table 34. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz) Test Results Table 35. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Table 36. RE Test Equipment List Table 37. Harmonic Current Emission Limits for Class A equipment per Section 7 of EN Table 38. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Results Table 39. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Equipment List Table 40. VF (Flicker) Test Results Table 41. VF (Flicker) Test Equipment List Table 42. ESD Test Results Table 43. ESD Test Equipment List Table 44. RI Test Results Table 45. RI FOKI Test Results Update Table 46. RI EUT Clock Frequencies Test Results Update Table 47. RI Test Equipment List Table 48. EFT/B Test Results Table 49. EFT/B Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page v of vii

7 Table of Contents Table 50. Combination Wave Generator Test Parameters for Surge Immunity Testing Table 51. Surge Test Results Table 52. Surge Test Equipment List Table 53. CI Test Results Table 54. CI Test Equipment List Table 55. Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions Limits Table 56. Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions Limits Table 57. VDI Test Results Table 58. VDI Test Equipment List List of Figures Figure 1. Block Diagram of Test Configuration... 9 Figure 2. Test Circuit for EN Figure 3. Fast Transient Test Waveform from EN Figure 4. Surge Test Waveforms from EN List of Photographs Photograph 1. Front of... 8 Photograph 2. Rear of... 8 Photograph 3. CE Voltage Test Setup Photograph 4. CE Voltage - DC Power Port Test Setup Photograph 5. CE Telecom Ports Test Setup Photograph 6. RE Test Setup Photograph GHz RE Test Setup Photograph 8. RE Test Setup Photograph 9. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Setup Photograph 10. VF (Flicker) Test Setup Photograph 11. ESD Test Points Front of EUT Photograph 12. ESD Test Points Rear of EUT Photograph 13. ESD Test Points Right of EUT Photograph 14. ESD Test Points Left of EUT Photograph 15. ESD Test Setup Photograph 16. RI Test Setup Photograph 17. EFT/B AC Power Test Setup Photograph 18. EFT/B DC Power Test Setup Photograph 19. EFT/B I/O Test Setup Photograph 20. AC Surge Test Setup Photograph 21. I/O Surge Test Setup Photograph 22. CI AC Power Test Setup Photograph 23. CI DC Power Test Setup Photograph 24. CI IO Test Setup Photograph 25. VDI Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page vi of vii

8 List of Terms and Abbreviations List of Terms and Abbreviations AC Alternating Current FOKI Frequency of Key Interest µf microfarad GRP Ground Reference Plane µh microhenry H Magnetic Field µs microseconds HCP Horizontal Coupling Plane ACF Antenna Correction Factor Hz Hertz AV Average IEC International Electrotechnical Commission Cal Calibration khz kilohertz CE Conducted Emissions kpa kilopascal CI Conducted Immunity kv kilovolt CISPR Comite International Special des Perturbations Radioelectriques (International Special Committee on Radio LISN Line Impedance Stabilization Network Interference) d Measurement Distance MHz Megahertz db Decibels MI Magnetic Immunity dbµa Decibels above one microamp PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency dbµa/m Decibels above one microamp per meter QP Quasi Peak dbµv Decibels above one microvolt RE Radiated Emissions dbµv/m Decibels above one microvolt per meter RF Radio Frequency DC Direct Current RI Radiated Immunity E Electric Field RMS Root-Mean-Square EFT/B Electrical Fast Transient/Burst V/m Volts per meter ESD Electrostatic Discharge VCP Vertical Coupling Plane EUT Equipment Under Test VDI Voltage Dips Interruptions f Frequency VF Voltage Fluctuations MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page vii of vii

9 Testing Summary 1.0 Testing Summary 1.1. Emissions Test Summary The emissions tests specified below were performed with the following results: Frequency Range MHz (230 VAC, 50 Hz) MHz (120 VAC, 60 Hz) MHz (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz) Specification EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 Conducted Emissions (Mains) Measurement (MHz) Margin (dbµv) Class Compliance Compliant A Compliant VCCI Compliant Conducted Emissions (DC Power) (48 VDC) ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) A Compliant MHz (DCN 1000Mb) MHz (NCT1 1000Mb) 30 MHz 1 GHz 1-40 GHz 1-6 GHz 30 MHz 1 GHz 1-40 GHz 1-6 GHz Conducted Emissions (Telecommunication Ports) EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003, VCCI ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003, VCCI ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) FCC Part 15 Subpart B (per ANSI C63.4: 2014), ICES-003 EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, CISPR 32: 2012, AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, VCCI, ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( Radiated Emissions (AC Power) Compliant A Compliant Radiated Emissions (DC Power) Compliant A Compliant Compliant Compliant A Compliant Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 1 of 111

10 Testing Summary Test Description Harmonic Current Emissions Voltage Fluctuations/Flicker Specification Harmonic and Flicker Worst Case Measurement Margin Compliance EN : Compliant EN : 2013 Plt: 0.07 Pst: 0.07 Dmax: 0 Dc: 0 D(t): 0 Plt: Pst: Dmax: -4 Dc: -3 D(t): -0.2 Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 2 of 111

11 Testing Summary 1.2. Immunity Test Summary The immunity tests specified below were performed with the following results: EN 55024: 2010, CISPR 24: 2010 & TEC India No: TEC/EMI/TEL-001/01/FEB-09 Port Test Description Specification Enclosure Signal and Telecommunication DC Power AC Power Electrostatic Discharge Radiated Electromagnetic Field Magnetic Immunity EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio-Frequency Fields Voltage Dips, Interruptions and Variations EN : 2009 EN : A1:2008 +A2:2010 EN : 2010 EN : 2004 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004 Test Level Required ±4 kv Contact ±8 kv Air MHz at 3 V/m 1 A/m Test Level Achieved ±4 kv Contact ±8 kv Air MHz at 10 V/m Performance Criteria Achieved A A Compliance Compliant Compliant Not Applicable The EUT does not contain any magnetic sensitive components. ±0.5 kv ±0.5 kv A Compliant ±1 kv 1.2/50ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Not Applicable The EUT does not have indoor cables MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz A Compliant ±0.5 kv ±1 kv A Compliant ±0.5 kv 1.2/50ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 1.2/50ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz A A Compliant Compliant ±1 kv ±1 kv A Compliant ±2 kv (line to earth) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz >95% Reduction, 0.5 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period >95%, Reduction 250 Period ±2 kv (line to earth) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz >95% Reduction, 0.5 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period >95%, Reduction 250 Period A A A A A Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 3 of 111

12 Testing Summary Port Test Description Specification Enclosure Outdoor Signal Lines Indoor Signal Lines AC Power DC Power Electrostatic Discharge Radiated Electromagnetic Field EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields EFT/B Surge Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields Voltage Dips, Interruptions and Variations EFT/B EN : 2009 EN : A1:2008 +A2:2010 EN : 2004+A1:2 010 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004+A1:2 010 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004+A1:2 010 EN : 2006 EN : 2009 EN : 2004 EN : 2004+A1:2 010 ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) TC Test Level Required ±4 kv Contact ±4 kv Air OTC Test Level Required ±6 kv Contact ±8 kv Air MHz at 3 V/m MHz, at 10 V/m ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±1 kv (lines to ground) 1.2/50 ms MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±0.5 kv (lines to ground) 1.2/50 ms MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±1 kv (line to ground) ±0.5 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms ±1 kv 5/50 ms ±2 kv (line to ground) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Not Applicable ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms 100% Reduction, 0.5 Period 100%, Reduction 1 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period 100%, Reduction 250 Period ±1 kv 5/50 ms Test Level Achieved ±4 kv Contact ±4 kv Air MHz at 10 V/m MHz, at 10 V/m ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±1 kv (line to ground) 1.2/50 ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±0.5 kv 5/50 ms ±0.5 kv (line to ground) 1.2/50 ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz ±1 kv 5/50 ms ±2 kv (line to ground) ±1 kv (line to line) 1.2/50 ms MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz 100% Reduction, 0.5 Period 100%, Reduction 1 Period 30% Reduction 25 Period 100%, Reduction 250 Period ±1 kv 5/50 ms Performance Criteria Achieved A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Compliance Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 4 of 111

13 Testing Summary Port Test Description Specification Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields TC = Telecom Center OTC = Other Than Telecom Center EN : 2009 ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) TC Test Level Required OTC Test Level Required MHz at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Test Level Achieved MHz, at 3 Vrms 80% AM 1 khz Performance Criteria Achieved A Compliance Compliant MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 5 of 111

14 Equipment Configuration 2.0 Equipment Configuration 2.1. Overview MET Laboratories, Inc. was contracted by Infinera to perform testing on the Cloud Xpress (CX-100E- 1200F-C2/XTa33xx), under Infinera, purchase order number This document describes the test setups, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limit criteria used to perform compliance testing of the Infinera,. In accordance with 2.955(a) (3), the following data is presented in support of the verification of the Infinera,. Infinera should retain a copy of this document which should be kept on file for at least two years after the manufacturing of the Cloud Xpress (CX-100E- 1200F-C2/XTa33xx) has been permanently discontinued, as per 2.955(b). The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested. Model(s) Tested: Model(s) Covered: Primary Power as Tested: Equipment Emissions Class: Highest frequency generated or used by the EUT: Evaluated by: 100~240 V, 48 Vdc A 100 GHz Joe Vang Report Date: April 6, References for VCCI VCCI V-3/ VCCI V-4/ A-0124 (for CE) & A-0125 (for RE) Technical Requirements Instructions for Test Conditions for Equipment under Test Laboratory Registration Number MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 6 of 111

15 Equipment Configuration Test Site All testing was performed at MET Laboratories, Inc., Western Ave., Union City, CA All equipment used in making physical determinations is accurate and bears recent traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. MET Laboratories is an ISO/IEC accredited site by A2LA, (California # ) Radiated Emissions measurements were performed in a semi-anechoic chamber. In accordance with 2.948(a)(3), a complete site description is contained at MET Laboratories Measurement Uncertainty Test Method Typical Expanded Uncertainty (db) K Confidence Level Radiated Emissions, (30 MHz 1 GHz) ± % Radiated Emissions, (1-6 GHz) ± % Conducted Emission ± % CEV Telecom Port ± % Table 1: Uncertainty Calculations Summary MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 7 of 111

16 Equipment Configuration 2.2. Detailed EUT Description and Test Setup Description of Test Sample The, Equipment Under Test (EUT), is a purposebuilt, optimized platform family for point-to-point hyper-scale bandwidth interconnect application across regional, metro and campus environments including data centers. It leverages the opic-500 optical engine, Infinera s unique metro-optimized photonic integrated circuit, to deliver DWDM datacenter interconnect services up to 500 gigabits per second (Gb/s) in a compact two rack unit chassis Photograph(s) of Test Sample Photograph 1. Front of Photograph 2. Rear of MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 8 of 111

17 Equipment Configuration Block Diagram Figure 1. Block Diagram of Test Configuration MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 9 of 111

18 Equipment Configuration Equipment Configuration The EUT was setup as outlined in Figure 1. All equipment incorporated as part of the EUT is included in the following list. Slot # Name / Description Model Number Part Number * Serial Number CX-1200F CX-100E-1200F- C2/XTa33xx MA Control Module XMM MA AC Power Supply XP2-PEM-AC GA1649RE002A AC Power Supply XP2-PEM-AC GA1504R1008A 1 QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBG QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBH QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBG QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBH QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF QSFP28 TOM-100G-Q-SR INFBF DC Power Supply XP2-PEM-DC W21624RE0014 DC Power Supply XP2-PEM-DC W21624RE0029 Alternate Modules using the same hardware Variants Description x=blank or B (represents instant bandwidth); y=blank, O (represents Facebook) CX-100E-1200Fx-y-Cz or FX (represents general availability); z= 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13 or 14 and represents reach a=s (represents submarine application)or blank xx=03, 06, 09, 12, 18, 24 and represents the number of 100GE clients possible; b=n, B or P and represents XTa33xx-Yb-EmCnp instant bandwidth; m=b, Q, E, S, Z and represents modulation type; n=2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13 or 14 and represents reach; p=a2+, D2+ or blank and represents the kit type AC/DC QSFP28 used in EUT TOM-100G-Q-LR4 TOM-100G-Q-CLR4 TOM-100G-Q-CWDM4 TOM-100G-LR4 TOM-100G-SR10 TOM-100GMR-LR4 *Serial Numbers are optional only if production cards for the EUT are to be manufactured at the same manufacturing facility. If cards are to be produced at multiple manufacturing facilities, then please provide the serial numbers. Table 2. Equipment Configuration MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 10 of 111

19 Equipment Configuration Support Equipment Support equipment necessary for the operation and testing of the EUT is included in the following list. Name / Description Manufacturer Model Number * Customer Supplied Calibration Data Optical Network Tester JDSU ONT-603 Not Required Laptop Lenovo T60 Not Required Table 3. Support Equipment * All customer supplied support equipment will include the equipments calibration data. This column will be marked as either not applicable, not available, or will contain the calibration date supplied by the customer Ports and Cabling Information Port name on EUT Cable & Connector Description or reason for no cable Qty Length as tested (m) Max Length (m) Shielded (Y/N) Termination Box ID & Port Name TOM 1 MPO N Tester Line In & Out LC N Loopback Serial RJ N Laptop DCN RJ N Laptop NCT1 & NCT2 RJ N Unterminated Table 4. Ports and Cabling Information MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 11 of 111

20 Equipment Configuration Mode of Operation & Method of Monitoring EUT Operation The EUT was operated in the following manner: The EUT port 1was connected to ONT-603 Optical Network Tester with MPO cable and the signal was running between the tester and the EUT. Performance of the EUT was monitored in the following manner: The Cloud Xpress was monitored through ONT-603 Optical Network Tester for signal degradation and Bit Error Rates Overall Immunity Performance Criteria In accordance with EN 55024, the EUT was evaluated according to the following performance criteria where specified: Performance Criterion A: The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended. Performance Criterion B: After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as intended without operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed, after the application of the phenomena below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the equipment is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. During the test, degradation of performance is allowed. However, no change of operating state or stored data is allowed to persist after the test. If the minimum performance level (or the permissible performance loss) is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended. Performance Criterion C: Loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the controls by the user in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions. Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or protected by a battery backup, shall not be lost. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 12 of 111

21 Equipment Configuration General Performance Criteria for ETSI EN The general performance criteria apply for those ports for which no specific performance criteria are defined (e.g. auxiliary ports) in the present document. Performance Criterion A: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be deduced from the product description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Performance Criterion B: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. In some cases the performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance. During the exposure to an electromagnetic phenomenon, degradation of performance is, however, allowed. No change of actual operating state or stored data is allowed. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be deduced from the product description and documentation and what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Performance Criterion C: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable or can be restored by the operation of the controls, or, in the case of switching equipment, by normal subsequent use Modifications to EUT No modifications were made to the EUT Test Software Used MET Labs uses software to gather information from test instrumentation. For Conducted Emissions, the current version is: PMM Emissions Suite Rev 2.04 and Jamila CE Rev For Radiated Emissions testing, the current version is: Jamila UC Disposition of EUT The test sample including all support equipment (if any), submitted to the Electro-Magnetic Compatibility Lab for testing was returned to Infinera upon completion of testing. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 13 of 111

22 Emissions Criteria 3.0 Emission Criteria 3.1. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Section (a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) United States ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, per Clause 5.1 CAN/CSA-CISPR Canada VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , Clause 4.1 Japan ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) Clause 6.1, per EN European Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Class A limits shown in Table 5: Frequency Range Class A Limits db(µv) Class B Limits db(µv) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average to to Note 1 The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. Note 2 The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. Table 5. Conducted Emissions - AC Voltage (CE-V) limits Annex A of EN Sample Calculation: MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 14 of 111

23 Emissions Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a semi-anechoic. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of CISPR 32 were used. The EUT was powered through a 50Ω/50μH LISN. An EMI receiver, connected to the measurement port of the LISN, scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz in order to find the peak conducted emissions. All peak emissions within 6 db of the limit were remeasured using a quasi-peak and/or average detector as appropriate Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Results The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (AC) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 15 of 111

24 Emissions Criteria Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 6. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 1. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 16 of 111

25 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 7. CE Voltage - (230 VAC, 50 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 2. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 17 of 111

26 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 8. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 3. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 18 of 111

27 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 9. CE AC Voltage - (120 VAC, 60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 4. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 19 of 111

28 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 10. CE Voltage - (100 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Phase Line Test Results Plot 5. CE Voltage, Phase Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 20 of 111

29 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 11. CE Voltage - (110 VAC, 50/60 Hz), Neutral Line Test Results Plot 6. CE Voltage, Neutral Line Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 21 of 111

30 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 3. CE Voltage Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 22 of 111

31 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at (AC) Mains Terminals Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Cal Due Date Date 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda /11/ /11/2017 1U0336 LISN Com Power LI-215A 05/31/ /31/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 Universal Shielding EMI Shielded Corp. Enclosure Not Required Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 12. CE Voltage Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 23 of 111

32 Emissions Criteria 3.2. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) Clause 6.2, per EN European Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Class A limits shown in Table 13: Frequency Range Class A Limits db(µv) Class B Limits db(µv) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average to to Note: The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. Table 13. Mains Terminal Disturbance Voltage limits Annex A of EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 24 of 111

33 Emissions Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a semi-anechoic chamber. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of CISPR 32 were used. The EUT was powered through a 50Ω/50μH LISN. An EMI receiver, connected to the measurement port of the LISN, scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz in order to find the peak conducted emissions. All peak emissions within 6 db of the limit were remeasured using a quasi-peak and/or average detector as appropriate Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (DC) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 25 of 111

34 Emissions Criteria Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 14. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Test Results Plot 7. CE Voltage (-48 VDC), DC Power Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 26 of 111

35 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 15. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Test Results Plot 8. CE Voltage (RTN), DC Power Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 27 of 111

36 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 4. CE Voltage - DC Power Port Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 28 of 111

37 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at DC Power Port Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3988 LISN COM Power LI /15/ /15/2017 1S3989 LISN COM Power LI /15/ /15/2017 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda /11/ /11/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 Universal Shielding Corp. Table 16. CE Voltage DC Power Port Test Equipment List EMI Shielded Enclosure Not Required MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 29 of 111

38 Emissions Criteria 3.3. Limits for Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method per EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , Clause 4.2 Japan ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 6.3 per EN European Test Requirements The EUT shall meet the Conducted Common Mode Class A limits shown in Table 17: Frequency Range Voltage Limits db(µv) Current Limits db(µa) (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average Quasi- Peak Average to to to to Note: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz. The current and voltage disturbnace limits are derived for use with an ISN which presents a common mode (asymetric mode) impedance of 150 W to the telecommunication port under test (conversion factor is 20 Log /1 = 44 db). Table 17. Limits of Conducted Common Mode (Asymmetric Mode) Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports per Annex A of EN Class A MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 30 of 111

39 Emissions Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in a shielded enclosure. The measurements were performed using normal operation of the equipment. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of Clause 9 of EN were used. The EMI receiver scanned the frequency range from 150 khz to 30 MHz. The measurements were performed over the frequency range of 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz using an ISN or Current Probe and Capacitive Voltage Probe as the input transducer to an EMC field intensity meter. For shielded signal lines, the insulation was broken 30 cm to 80 cm away from the EUT to reach the outside metallic surface of the shield to connect a 150 Ω resistor from the outside surface of the shield to ground. Measurements were taken with a Current Probe placed 10 cm away from the 150 Ω resistor towards the EUT Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Conducted Emissions (Telecom Ports) Ambient Temperature: 24 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: 100 kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 31 of 111

40 Emissions Criteria Test Data Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 18. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Test Results Plot 9. CE Telecom Ports (DCN 1000Mb) Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 32 of 111

41 Emissions Criteria Freq QP QP Average Average Delta Results (MHz) Amplitude Limit Amplitude Limit Delta Results Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 19. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Test Results Plot 10. CE Telecom Ports (NCT1 1000Mb) Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 33 of 111

42 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 5. CE Telecom Ports Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 34 of 111

43 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Conducted Disturbance at Telecommunication Ports Test Date(s): 03/17/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3988 LISN COM Power LI /15/ /15/2017 1S3989 LISN COM Power LI /15/ /15/2017 1S2676 PMM Receiver Narda /11/ /11/2017 1U0336 LISN Com Power LI-215A 05/31/ /31/2017 1U0034 Shield Room # 3 1U0255 Impedance Stabilization Network Universal Shielding Corp. Table 20. CE Telecom Ports Test Equipment List EMI Shielded Enclosure Not Required Not Required TESEQ GMBH ISN T8 05/26/ /26/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 35 of 111

44 Emissions Criteria 3.4. Radiated Emission: Limits of Electromagnetic Radiation Disturbance Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN 55032, CISPR 32 Electromagnetic compatibility of multimedia equipment Emission requirements FCC Part 15 Section (a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Applicability Standard Region MHz Semi-anechoic test environment > 1 GHz Free-Space test environment EN 55032:2012/AC:2013, Annex A European Yes Yes CISPR 32: 2012, Annex A International Yes Yes AS/NZS CISPR 32: 2013, Annex A Australia / New Zealand Yes Yes FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Section (a) (b) (per ANSI C63.4: 2014) United States Yes Yes ICES-003 Issue 6, January 2016, CAN/CSA-CISPR Canada Yes Yes VCCI V-3/ and V-4/ , Section 4.3 Japan Yes Yes ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ) Clause 7.1.1, per EN European Yes Yes MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 36 of 111

45 Emissions Criteria Frequency Band (MHz) Test Requirements For radiated emission, the EUT shall meet the Class A radiated emission limits shown in Table 21, Table 22, and Table m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class A Quasi-Peak limits 10 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class B Quasi-Peak limits 10 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 30 to to VCCI Limits 2 TEC India Limits Table 21. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Below 1 GHz Frequency (GHz) Average limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class A Peak limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Average limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) Class B Peak limits 3 m measurement distance db(μv/m) 1 to to Table 22. Electromagnetic Radiated Disturbance limits, Above 1 GHz Frequency (MHz) (b), Class A Limit 10m Field Strength db(μv/m) (a),class B Limit 3m Above 1 GHz If the highest frequency generated or used in the device or on which the device operates or tunes is: less than 108 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is 1000 MHz between 108 MHz 500 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range in 2000 MHz between MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is 5000 MHz above 1000 MHz, the upper frequency of measurement range is the 5 th harmonic of the highest frequency or 40 GHz, whichever is lower Table 23. Radiated Emissions Limits calculated per FCC Part 15, (a) (b) and ICES-003 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 37 of 111

46 Emissions Criteria Sample Calculation for Distance Correction factor (DCF) measurement: Sample formula for calculating the Corrected Data for the Radiated Emissions Measurements: Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) (+) Pre Amp Gain (db)(-) CBL (db) (+) DCF (db) (+) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv/m) Limit (dbuv/m) Margin (db) V Corrected Amplitude (dbµv/m) = Uncorrected Amplitude (dbµv) +ACF (db) - Preamp Gain (db) + CBL (db) +DCF (db) ** = = MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 38 of 111

47 Emissions Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located inside a semi-anechoic chamber. Various antennas were placed near the EUT and measurements were taken of the field strengths and frequencies. For final radiated measurements, the EUT was placed in semianechoic chamber, and located 3 m away from an adjustable antenna mast. For pre-scanning, the spectrum analyzer scanned the frequency range from 30 MHz to 1 GHz to obtain an emission profile of the EUT. For each point of measurement, the turntable was rotated, and the antenna height was varied between 1 m and 4 m, in order to find the maximum radiated emissions. Measurements above 30 MHz were taken using this technique with the antenna in two polarizations: horizontal and vertical. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using a peak detector with a 120 khz bandwidth (30 MHz 1 GHz) and 1 MHz bandwidth (1-6 GHz). For emission between 1 GHz and 18 GHz, a double ridged guide horn was located 3 m from the EUT on an adjustable mast. A pre-scan was performed and used to find prominent radiated emissions. The pre-scan method includes investigation of the cone(s) of radiation output from the EUT using a boresighting antenna or with manual investigation by hand. For final emissions measurements at each frequency of interest, the EUT was rotated and the antenna height was varied depending on the geometry of the EUT and previously investigated cone(s) of radiation. In order to ensure maximized emissions, the horn antenna was positioned both vertically and horizontally. Measurements in both horizontal and vertical polarities were made and the data was recorded. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using an average detector with a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. For emission between 18 GHz and 40 GHz, a horn antenna was located 3 m from the EUT on an adjustable mast for class A device and 1m distance for class B device. A prescan was performed and used to find prominent radiated emissions. The pre-scan method includes investigation of the cone(s) of radiation output from the EUT using a boresighting antenna or with manual investigation by hand. For final emissions measurements at each frequency of interest, the EUT was rotated and the antenna height was varied depending on the geometry of the EUT and previously investigated cone(s) of radiation. In order to ensure maximized emissions, the horn antenna was positioned both vertically and horizontally. Measurements in both horizontal and vertical polarities were made and the data was recorded. Unless otherwise specified, measurements were made using an average detector with a 1 MHz resolution bandwidth. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 39 of 111

48 Emissions Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the Class A requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Radiated Emission Ambient Temperature: 26.9 C Relative Humidity: 33% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Bao Nguyen Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 40 of 111

49 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Test Data Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H H V V H Table 24. RE AC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 11. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 41 of 111

50 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H V H Table 25. RE AC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H H V Table 26. RE AC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization Plot 12. RE AC Power (1-6 GHz), Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 42 of 111

51 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H H V V H Table 27. RE DC Power- (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 13. RE DC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 43 of 111

52 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H H V Table 28. RE DC Power Peak - (1-6 GHz) Test Results Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H H V Table 29. RE DC Power Average - (1-6 GHz) Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 44 of 111 = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization Plot 14. RE DC Power (1-6 GHz), Plot

53 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H H V V H Table 30. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 15. RE AC Power - (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 45 of 111

54 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H H V V V Table 31. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz) Test Results The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 16. RE AC Power Peak - (1-18 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 46 of 111

55 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) * V H Table 32. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Note(s): * - At this frequency, the measured electric-field strength exhibits a margin of compliance that is less than 3 db below the specification limit. We recommend that every emission measured, have at least a 3 db margin to allow for deviations in the emission characteristics that may occur during the production process. The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 17. RE AC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 47 of 111

56 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H H V V H Table 33. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz) Test Results Plot 18. RE DC Power (30 MHz 1 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 48 of 111

57 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) V H V H H V V V Table 34. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz) Test Results Note: The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 19. RE DC Power Average - (1-18 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 49 of 111

58 Emissions Criteria Frequency (MHz) Antenna Polarity EUT Azimuth (Degrees) Antenna Height (cm) Uncorrected Amplitude (dbuv) ACF (db/m) Pre Amp Gain (db) CBL (db) DCF (db) Corrected Amplitude (dbuv) Limit (dbuv) Margin (db) * V H Table 35. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz) Test Results Note(s): * - At this frequency, the measured electric-field strength exhibits a margin of compliance that is less than 3 db below the specification limit. We recommend that every emission measured, have at least a 3 db margin to allow for deviations in the emission characteristics that may occur during the production process. The EUT was tested at 3 m. The data has been corrected for comparison with the 10 m limit using the formula: 20log (3 m/10 m) as expressed in the 'Distance Correction' column. Plot 20. RE DC Power Peak - (18-40 GHz), Plot = Vertical Polarization = Horizontal Polarization MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 50 of 111

59 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 6. RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 51 of 111

60 Emissions Criteria Photograph GHz RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 52 of 111

61 Emissions Criteria Photograph 8. RE Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 53 of 111

62 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Radiated Emissions Electric Field Test Date(s): 03/03/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3830 Biconilog Antenna Sunol Sciences Corporation JB3 08/03/ /03/2018 1S2501 EMI Test Receiver 20 Hz-40 GHz Rohde & Schwarz ESU40 01/11/ /11/2018 1S2668 Amplifier Sonoma Instruments 310 N See Note 1S2499 Multi Device Controller ETS EMCO 2090 Not Required 1S2617 Active Horn Antenna Com-Power AHA /12/ /12/2018 1S2583 Spectrum Analyzer Agilent/Hewlett Packard E4447A 10/31/ /31/2017 1S2635 Preamplifier (1 GHz-27 AML Communications GHz) AML0126L3801 See Note 1S2495 Multi Device Controller ETS EMCO 2090 Not Required 1S3866 Table Top Amplifier MITEQ TTA HG See Note 1S2698 Double Ridge Guide Horn Antenna A.H. Systems, Inc. SAS /27/ /27/2018 1S Meter Chamber (NSA) ETS-Lingren DKE- 8X8 DBL See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 36. RE Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 54 of 111

63 Emissions Criteria 3.5. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Limits of Harmonic Current Emissions (Equipment Input Current < 16 A per Phase) The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause EN : 2014 Region European European Test Requirements EN , Section 7 - The EUT must not produce harmonic currents, which exceed the limits expressed in Table 37. Maximum Permissible Harmonic Current Harmonic Order (in Amperes) Odd Harmonics < n < /n Maximum Permissible Harmonic Current Harmonic Order (in Amperes) Even Harmonics < n < /n Table 37. Harmonic Current Emission Limits for Class A equipment per Section 7 of EN Test Procedure The measurement was performed using normal operation of the equipment. The method of testing, test conditions, and test procedures of EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 55 of 111

64 Emissions Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Harmonic Current Emission Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/24/ Test Data Class (A, B, C, D) Voltage (V) Current (A) Frequency (Hz) Total Harmonic Distortion (%) A Harmonic # Measured (A) Class A Limit (A) Results Notes Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Pass None Table 38. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 56 of 111

65 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 9. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 57 of 111

66 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Harmonic Current Emissions Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1T4849 Power Analyzer Yokogawa WT /22/ /22/2018 4U1646 Elgar DC Power test system Ametek SW See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 39. Harmonic Current Emissions Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 58 of 111

67 Emissions Criteria 3.6. Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker) Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Limitation of Voltage Changes, Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker in Public Low-Voltage Supply Systems, for Equipment with Rated Current 16 A per Phase and Not Subject to Conditional Connection The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause European EN : 2013 European Test Requirements EN , Section 5 - The EUT must not produce voltage fluctuations and/or flicker at the supply terminals as measured or calculated according to clause 4, according to limits expressed in Section 5, under test conditions described in Clause 6 and Annex A of EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 59 of 111

68 Emissions Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was operated with an AC main source at 230 VAC, 50 Hz. Tests to prove the compliance of the EUT with the limits of EN , Clause 5 were made using the test circuit provided in Figure 2 of EN The test circuit consisted of the test power supply, the reference impedance, the EUT, and a Power Analyzer. The test supply voltage (open-circuit voltage) was the rated voltage of the equipment. The test voltage was maintained within 2 % of the nominal value. The frequency was 50 Hz ± 0.5%. The total harmonic distortion of the supply voltage was less than 3%. The limits applicable to voltage fluctuations and flicker at the supply terminals of the EUT were automatically measured with the analyzer. Figure 2. Test Circuit for EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 60 of 111

69 Emissions Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. Measured emissions were below applicable limits. Environmental Conditions for Voltage Fluctuation (Flicker) Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 40% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/24/ Test Data Voltage (V) Current (A) Frequency (Hz) Power Factor Average (Is) relative voltage Drop d(t) 0 Relative voltage fluctuation (3s) Dpp 0 d(t) at steady - state level YES /NO yes Last relative steady - state level change Dc 0 Last transition swing Dmax -- Normalized peak flicker (3s) Pp 0 Parameter Observation Period Short Long Limit Observation Time Tp 10 min 120 min Maximum relative voltage change dmax Max rel. steady-state voltage change dc Duration of d(t) > 3 % t Short term flicker severity Pst Long term flicker severity Plt NA Table 40. VF (Flicker) Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 61 of 111

70 Emissions Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 10. VF (Flicker) Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 62 of 111

71 Emissions Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Voltage Fluctuations (Flicker) Test Date(s): 03/24/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1T4849 Power Analyzer Yokogawa WT /22/ /22/2018 4U1646 Elgar DC Power test system Ametek SW See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 41. VF (Flicker) Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 63 of 111

72 Immunity Criteria 4.0 Immunity Criteria 4.1. Electrostatic Discharge Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Electromagnetic Discharge Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause International ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 5.1 European Test Requirements EN The EUT shall be tested with air discharges of up to ±8 kv applied to non-conductive surfaces, and to contact discharges of up to ±4 kv, applied to conductive surfaces of the EUT, HCP and the VCP. ETSI EN The immunity test method and laboratory conditions are described in EN [9], and as specified in EN Clause 5.1 and The EUT must not be susceptible to the test levels of Table 1 or Table 6 per section 7.2 of ETSI EN Performance Criterion B applies, as specified in EN Clause [For Telecom Centres, Clause ] and Clause [For Other Than Telecom Centres, Clause ]. The EUT shall be connected to the grounding system in accordance with its installation specifications. No additional grounding connections are allowed Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack in accordance with IEC Air discharges of up to ±8 kv were applied to non-conductive surfaces. Contact discharges of up to ±4 kv were applied to conductive surfaces of the EUT and the VCP. Discharges were applied at least ten times to each selected discharge point at each polarity with a minimum time between discharges of 1s. The functionality of the EUT was determined during and after each discharge. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 64 of 111

73 Immunity Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Results The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Electrostatic Discharge Ambient Temperature: 25 C Relative Humidity: 45.6% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Juy Yang Test Date(s): 03/27/ Test Data Discharge Test Voltage Results Type (±kv) Front Back Left Right Anomalies EN VCP 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. Contact 2 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. Discharge 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed. 2 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. Air Discharge 4 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. 6 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. 8 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed. ETSI Discharge Test Voltage Results Type (±kv) Front Back Left Right Anomalies VCP 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Contact 2 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Discharge 4 Pass Pass Pass Pass No anomalies observed Air Discharge 2 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed 4 Pass Pass N/A N/A No anomalies observed Table 42. ESD Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 65 of 111

74 Immunity Criteria ESD Test Point Photographs Photograph 11. ESD Test Points Front of EUT Photograph 12. ESD Test Points Rear of EUT X = Contact Discharge Test Points O = Air Discharge Test Points MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 66 of 111

75 Immunity Criteria Photograph 13. ESD Test Points Right of EUT Photograph 14. ESD Test Points Left of EUT X = Contact Discharge Test Points MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 67 of 111

76 Immunity Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 15. ESD Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 68 of 111

77 Immunity Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Electrostatic Discharge Test Date(s): 03/27/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U175 Electrostatic Discharge Simulator Noise Laboratory ESS /29/ /29/2017 1U176 Electrostatic Discharge Gun Noise Laboratory TC-815R 09/29/ /29/2017 1U076 Test Area Ground Plane 1 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 43. ESD Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 69 of 111

78 Immunity Criteria 4.2. Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : A1:2008 +A2:2010 Radiated, Radio-Frequency, Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause International ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 5.5 European Test Requirements EN The frequency ranges below were performed per Performance Criterion A: Frequency Range Modulation Test Level 80 MHz 1000 MHz 80% AM, 1 khz 3 V/m ETSI EN The EUT must not be susceptible to electromagnetic field in the frequency range of: Frequency Range Modulation Test Level 80 MHz 800 MHz 3 V/m MHz 10 V/m MHz 80% AM, 1 khz 3 V/m MHz 10 V/m MHz 3 V/m Performance Criterion A applies, as specified in EN Clause [For Telecom Centres, Clause ] and Clause [For Other Than Telecom Centres, Clause ]. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 70 of 111

79 Immunity Criteria Test Procedure Testing was performed in a semi-anechoic chamber as recommended by IEC The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack located in the area of field uniformity. The radiating antenna was placed 2.2 m in front of the EUT. Support equipment for the EUT was located outside of the test room. The amplitude, frequency, and dwell time of the radiated interference was controlled by an automated, computer-controlled system. The signal source was stepped through the applicable frequency range at a rate no faster than 1% of the fundamental. The signal was 80% amplitude modulated with 1 khz over the frequency range: The dwell time was set at 1 s. Field presence was monitored during testing via a field probe placed in close proximity to the EUT. Throughout testing, the EUT was closely monitored for signs of susceptibility. The test was performed with the antennae oriented in both a horizontal and vertical polarization Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Ambient Temperature: 21 C Relative Humidity: 49% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Bao Nguyen Test Date(s): 03/19/2017 MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 71 of 111

80 Immunity Criteria Start Frequency (MHz) Test Data Stop Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (H/V) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right EN V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass ETSI V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 44. RI Test Results Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (V/H) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right EN V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass ETSI V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 72 of 111

81 Immunity Criteria Frequency (MHz) Severity (V/m) Polarity (V/H) Modulation (Freq & Type) Results Front Back Left Right V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass V/H 1 khz, 80%AM Pass Pass Pass Pass Table 45. RI FOKI Test Results Update EUT Clocks (MHz) Polarity Results Anomalies R3-18: Field Strength 10 V/m 12.8 V&H Pass No anomalies observed V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 48 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 50 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. 125 V&H Pass No anomalies observed. Table 46. RI EUT Clock Frequencies Test Results Update MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 73 of 111

82 Immunity Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 16. RI Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 74 of 111

83 Immunity Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field Test Date(s): 03/18/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1S3927 Microwave Signal Generator Rohde & Schwarz SMF100A 11/02/ /02/2018 1U0227 Signal Generator Gigatronics 6061A 12/03/ /03/2017 1U0261 TWT Amplifier CPI VKV2776K4 See Note 1U0109 Wide Band Amp IFI SMX201 See Note 1U0025 Wideband System Amplifier IFI CMX5001 See Note 1U0257 Amplifier Amplifier Research 25S1G4A See Note 1U0303 E-field Probe Narda PMM EP601 01/21/ /21/2017 1U0022 Parallel Element Antenna EMCO 3107B See Note 1U0115 Antenna, Horn EMCO 3115 See Note 1U0040 Antenna, Biconilog Schaffner CBL6140A See Note 1U0033 Immunity Chamber Lindgren Enclosures FACT 3 See Note Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 47. RI Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 75 of 111

84 Immunity Criteria 4.3. Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause International ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 5.2 European Test Requirements EN The EUT shall be tested with the electrical fast transients shown in Figure 3, having an amplitude of up to ±1 kv applied to AC power ports and ±0.5 kv applied to DC power ports and signal ports. This is applicable to signal ports interfacing with cables whose total length according to the manufacturer s functional specification may exceed 3 m. The test setup, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limits of EN are to be used. ETSI EN , Applicable Clauses Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A * * * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected. Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A * * * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected. The EUT was tested with the electrical fast transients shown in Figure 3, having an amplitude of ±1 kv applied to the AC and DC power cables; ±0.5 kv applied to I/O and data lines. Only cables that could potentially exceed 3 m in length in real-world application of the EUT need to be tested. Performance Criterion B applies for all tests. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 76 of 111

85 Immunity Criteria Figure 3. Fast Transient Test Waveform from EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 77 of 111

86 Immunity Criteria Test Procedure The Electrical Fast Transient/Burst (EFT/B) generator and the coupling clamp (if used) were mounted to the ground plane. The EFT/B generator was operated to couple the required transient bursts to each line of the AC power input in common mode through its internal coupling/decoupling network. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive transients and negative transients. The EFT/B generator was operated to directly couple the required transient bursts to each line of the DC power input in common mode through an inline 33nF capacitor in series via the direct output of the generator. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive and negative transients. The EFT/B generator was operated to couple the required transient bursts to each I/O, data, or control lines through the capacitive coupling clamp if applicable. Transient bursts were applied for a period not less than one minute with both positive transients and negative transients. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored closely for signs of susceptibility. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 78 of 111

87 Immunity Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Fast Transients Ambient Temperature: 21 C Relative Humidity: 49% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/21/ Test Data Port Name Test Level Coupling Method Result Anomalies DC Power DC ±1 kv CCC Pass None AC ±1 kv CDN Pass None I/O Cables NCT1 ±0.5 kv CCC Pass None DCN ±0.5 kv CCC Pass None Table 48. EFT/B Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 79 of 111

88 Immunity Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 17. EFT/B AC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 80 of 111

89 Immunity Criteria Photograph 18. EFT/B DC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 81 of 111

90 Immunity Criteria Photograph 19. EFT/B I/O Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 82 of 111

91 Immunity Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Electrical Fast Transients/Bursts Test Date(s): 03/18/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U262 UCS 500 M EM Test UCS500M6B 08/16/ /16/2017 1U263 Capacitive Coupling Clamp EM Test HFK Functional 1U085 Test Area Ground Plane 2 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 49. EFT/B Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 83 of 111

92 Immunity Criteria 4.4. Surge Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Surge Immunity Test The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause International ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 5.3 European Test Requirements EN The EUT shall be tested with the surge test waveforms shown in Figure 4. AC Power Ports shall be tested to surges having an open circuit amplitude of ±1 kv (differential mode), and ±2 kv (common mode). DC Power Ports shall be tested to surges having an open circuit amplitude of ±0.5 kv. This is applicable to ports interfacing with cables which according to manufacturer s specification may connect directly to outdoor cables. The test setup, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limits of EN shall be used. ETSI EN , Applicable Clauses: The required test levels are compiled in the following table outlining the applicable Clauses: Surges on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centers, Port Type Requirements Outdoor Signal Indoor Signal Enclosure Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports Ports Ports N/A * N/A Surges on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centers, Port Type Requirements Outdoor Signal Indoor Signal Enclosure Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports Ports Ports N/A * N/A * Note: Only applies when cables longer than 10 m are connected. Ella, update notes The EUT was tested with the surge waveforms shown on the following page, having an open circuit amplitude of ±2 kv applied to phase to ground and neutral to ground, ±1 kv applied to phase to neutral and ±0.5 kv applied to the I/O indoor signal lines and ±1 kv applied to outdoor signal lines. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 84 of 111

93 Immunity Criteria Figure 4. Surge Test Waveforms from EN MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 85 of 111

94 Immunity Criteria Test Procedure The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack. EUT, power was supplied to the EUT through the coupling/decoupling section of the surge generator. For AC power lines, surge waveforms were coupled by the internal coupling/decoupling network of the surge generator. Each power line under test (if applicable) was subjected to at least five positive and five negative surges at the appropriate voltage and phase angle, at a maximum repetition rate of 1/min. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored for signs of susceptibility. For DC power lines, surge waveforms were directly injected using the direct output of the surge generator. Each power line under test (if applicable) was subjected to at least five positive and five negative surges at the appropriate voltage at a maximum repetition rate of 1/min. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored for signs of susceptibility. Open Circuit Voltage: Short Circuit Current: Telecom wave parameters: Front Time = 1.2 µs Time to Half = 50 µs Front Time = 8 µs Time to Half = 20 µs Front Time = 10 µs Time to Half = 700 µs Table 50. Combination Wave Generator Test Parameters for Surge Immunity Testing For AC power lines, the Combination Wave Generator was operated to couple the required surges between each EUT input power phase and ground, and from line to line. These three tests were performed with positive surges and negative surges, synchronized with the power input phase at 0, 90, and 270. Throughout testing, the EUT was monitored closely for signs of susceptibility. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 86 of 111

95 Immunity Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies were observed. Environmental Conditions for Surge Ambient Temperature: 25 C Relative Humidity: 46.5% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Juy Yang Test Date(s): 03/28/ Test Data Port Name Coupling Phase Test Level Coupling Method Results Anomalies EN AC, Differential Mode AC AC AC DC Power Supply Phase to Neutral Phase to Ground Neutral to Ground Line to Ground 0 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC, Common Mode 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None DC Power NA ±500 V Direct Injection Pass No anomalies observed IO Cables (Outdoor Only) N/A Line to Ground NA ±1.0 kv Direct Injection N/A N/A ETSI ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC Phase to 90 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None Neutral 180 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±1.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC Phase to 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 87 of 111

96 Immunity Criteria Port Name Coupling Phase Test Level Coupling Method Results Anomalies Ground 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None AC DCN NCT1 N/A Neutral to Ground Line to Ground Line to Ground Line to Ground Table 51. Surge Test Results 0 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 90 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 180 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None 270 ±2.0 kv Internal CDN Pass None IO Cables (Indoor) NA ±0.5 kv Direct Injection Pass None NA ±0.5 kv Direct Injection Pass None IO Cables (Indoor) NA ±1.0 kv Direct Injection N/A N/A MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 88 of 111

97 Immunity Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 20. AC Surge Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 89 of 111

98 Immunity Criteria Photograph 21. I/O Surge Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 90 of 111

99 Immunity Criteria Test Equipment List Calibrated test equipment utilized during testing was maintained in a current state of calibration per the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test Name: Surge Test Date(s): 03/28/2017 MET Asset # Equipment Manufacturer Model Last Cal Date Cal Due Date 1U262 UCS 500 M EM Test UCS 500M6B 08/16/ /16/2017 1U076 Test Area Ground Plane 1 MET Laboratories N/A Functional Note: Functionally tested equipment is verified using calibrated instrumentation at the time of testing. Table 52. Surge Test Equipment List MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 91 of 111

100 Immunity Criteria 4.5. Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous Test Method, Test Requirements, and Test Procedures Test Method EN : Immunity to Conducted Disturbances, Induced by Radio- Frequency Fields The following standards specified below are covered in the scope of this test report: Standard Region EN 55024: 2010, Clause European CISPR 24: 2010, Clause International ETSI EN V1.6.1 ( ), Clause 5.4 European Test Requirements EN This test is applicable for AC and DC power lines connected directly to mains supply and Signal Ports interfacing with cables whose total length according to the manufacturer s functional specification may exceed 3 m. The AC and DC power lines and applicable Signal Ports shall be tested to an injected level of 3 Vrms. The injection voltage shall be amplitude modulated 80% by a 1 khz tone over the frequency range of 150 khz to 80 MHz. ETSI EN The required test levels are compiled in the following table outlining the applicable Clauses: Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous on Equipment for Use in Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A * * * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous on Equipment for Use in Other than Telecom Centres, Port Type Requirements Enclosure Ports Outdoor Signal Ports Indoor Signal Ports AC Power Ports DC Power Ports N/A * * * Note 1: Only applies when cables longer than 3 m are connected MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 92 of 111

101 Immunity Criteria All interconnecting cables on the EUT including AC and DC power lines, data and control lines shall be tested for immunity to conducted radio frequencies in the range 0.15 MHz - 80 MHz. Using the bulk current injection method, DC Cables, I/O and data cables must be tested to a level of 3 Vrms. The injection voltage shall be amplitude modulated at 80% by a 1 khz sine wave Test Procedures The EUT was installed in a standard Telco rack. For power AC and DC line cables, a Coupling Decoupling Network (CDN) was used for injection. The CDN was initially calibrated in a calibration jig with a 50 W RF load and a 100 W matching resistor on one side, and a 100 W matching resistor and the receiver (spectrum analyzer) on the other. The injection voltage level was adjusted to maintain a monitored voltage of 3 Vrms across the frequency range 0.15 MHz to 80 MHz. For USB cables other than the power line, the direct injection method was used for injection. The insulation of the cable under test was removed, and the output of the injecting equipment was applied to the exposed screen via a 100 ohm resistor. For all other cables other than the power line, coupling and decoupling disturbing signals to an unscreened cable with CDN-T2, CDN-T4 or CDN-T8 shall be used as coupling and decoupling network (CDN) for injection. The CDN was initially calibrated in a calibration jig with a 50 Ω RF load and a 100 Ω matching resistor on one side, and a 100 Ω matching resistor and the receiver (spectrum analyzer) on the other. The injection voltage level was adjusted to maintain a monitored voltage of 3 Vrms across the frequency range 0.15 MHz to 80 MHz. MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 93 of 111

102 Immunity Criteria Test Results, Test Data, Test Setup, and Test Equipment List Test Result The EUT was compliant with the requirement(s) of this section. No anomalies observed. Environmental Conditions for Radio Frequency, Conducted Continuous Ambient Temperature: 22 C Relative Humidity: 41% Atmospheric Pressure: kpa Test Engineer(s): Joe Vang Test Date(s): 03/21/ Test Data Port Name On Modulation Coupling Severity (Vrms) EUT (Freq & Type) Method Results Anomalies DC 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None AC 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None NCT1 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None DCN 3 1 khz, 80%AM CDN Pass None USB 3 1 khz, 80%AM Direct Pass None Table 53. CI Test Results MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 94 of 111

103 Immunity Criteria Test Setup Photograph Photograph 22. CI AC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 95 of 111

104 Immunity Criteria Photograph 23. CI DC Power Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 96 of 111

105 Immunity Criteria Photograph 24. CI IO Test Setup MET Report: EMCU93869-Global 2017, MET Laboratories, Inc. Page 97 of 111