Status of the BIPM Watt Balance

Transcription

1 Status of the BIPM Watt Balance H. Fang, M. Stock

2 Present apparatus in the new laboratory New force comparator, vacuum compatible Laser source for interferometers New weighing pan New mass lifting device Modifications made to accommodate the apparatus Also some new components Fully operational in air

3 New components for the watt balance In-situ calibration of weighing cell Mass exchanger most mechanical parts available to be integrated into suspension Dynamic alignment system New magnet vacuum: < 0,01 Pa ready for measurements in 2014 no air convection; no air buoyancy no air refractive index correction 3

4 Fabrication planning for the new magnet Last step: assembly

5 New magnet: fabrication of parts Inner cover Outer cover Sm 2 Co 17 magnets Housing Core All parts now at BIPM All components meet the specifications Trial assembly (without the magnets) and uniformity of the gap width verified ( <1 µm)

6 New magnet: verification (assembly without magnets) measurement direction 2 capacitive sensors in opposition

7 New magnet: verification profile at 30 1 µm up down up profile at 60 up down up 1 µm

8 New magnet: assembly nearly finished magnetic force 1000 force / N distance / mm Some problems with too tight tolerances: now solved

9 Sources of the surrounding vibration noise (1) Air conditioners OFF Air conditioners successively ON Three noisiest units identified To be replaced or removed by October 2013

10 Sources of the surrounding vibration noise Red: air conditioners ON Hz Blue: air conditioners OFF 18 Hz Hz 34 Hz 65 Hz

11 Periodical non-linearity error (1) ϕ Laser f 1 f 2 f = 20 MHz Heterodyne interferometer PBS λ/4 f 2 Polarizer λ/4 f 1 l φ = 4π l /λ 2 λ/2 Extra phase term: periodic deviations (optical quality & alignment)

12 Periodical non-linearity error (2) 1 st order non-linearity Doppler frequency of about 600 Hz Significant 2 nd order non-linearity Example of the observed non-linearity errors (sampling rate of 25 khz) 6 nm 1 st axis 2 nd axis 10 nm short term: - better alignment - mathematical reduction long term: - new interferometer (2014) with physical separation of beams 6 nm 3 rd axis

13 Reduction by mathematical methods polynomial fitting position to be measured averaging Various methods evaluated Two of them (averaging and polynomial fitting) used Gave similar results in the present measurement conditions Averaging method Relative std. dev. (averaging method): 1 pt 2.8 x periods 7.6 x periods 9.3 x periods 3.2 x 10-4

14 Voltage-to-velocity ratio voltage-to-velocity ratio σ = 2 x 10-4 (normal coil U/v = 500 V.s/m) U = BL v U ( z) (1 + ε ( z)) N v ( z) (1 + ε ( z)) N Further reduction norm.voltage/velocity single up measurement σ = 8 x 10-5 (bifilar coil U/v = 250 V.s/m) norm.voltage/velocity 28 Hz peak -> stiffer coil (Macor) residual non-linearity error -> new interferometer vibration noise -> investigation under way phase resolution -> better phase detection Position in air gap / mm..etc.

15 Force measurement black: old location red: new location F ( N z) (1 + ε ( z)) I ( z) 20 mg 2 x 10-4 (100 g test mass) acceleration (vibration) single up measurement raw force 20 mg corrected force σ = 3 x 10-5

16 Next steps - assembly of the new magnet done - integration of new measurement facilities - vibration reduction (repl. of air cond.) - new stiffer coil done - new alignment reference - nexth measurements spring new interferometer (2014)

17 BIPM watt balance team Full-time Part-time Hao Fang principal physicist Adrien Kiss engineer Thomas Lavergne engineer (mechanics, since May 2013 for 2 years) Michael Stock (project leader; magnet) Lennart Robertsson (interferometry) Estefania de Mirandés (coil alignment, gravimetry) Stéphane Solve (JVS) Régis Charamy (JVS)

18