Introduction to CEAS techniques. D. Romanini Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique Université Grenoble 1/CNRS

Transcription

1 Introduction to CEAS techniques D. Romanini Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique Université Grenoble 1/CNRS

2

3 Outline : Interest of optical cavities in spectroscopy and related applications (through trace gas analysis ) General properties of optical cavities. How to measure the cavity losses, thus the absorption spectra? (ringdown, transmission ) How to inject light into a high finesse cavity using different light sources? => Different CEAS methods

4 Absorption spectroscopy Laser (λ) Sample cell Detector 1 ~ I out Detector 2 ~ I in I out = I in exp (- α L ) α L << 1 I / I = (I out I in ) / I in ~ - α L Higher sensitivity? Decrease noise on I and/or increase L (path).

5 The absorption coefficient carries all information on the sample α(σ) = Ν k Φ(σ) Detection of species at small concentration Detection of weak transitions Analysis of line profiles (collisions ) When N is known (at given P,T), absorption spectroscopy allows measuring k for different absorption lines Then, using this data allows quantitative trace detection (at given P,T) no calibration is in principle required! Φ(σ) Countless applications σ

6 Increasing the absorption path Multipass cell IN OUT 100 x path (10km!) volume / 100 IN Optical cavity OUT R = 1-T- Losses ~ 99,999% A. Kastler Appl. Opt. 1 (1962) 17 Atomes à l intérieur d un interféromètre Perot-Fabry

7 General properties of optical cavities.

8 Optical cavity = Resonator High sensitivity measurements most often exploit some kind of resonator or resonant filtering (lock in detection, quartz clock, atomic clocks ) A Fabry-Perot cavity is indeed an photon resonator It can accumulate an incoming field as a standing wave which has a persistence after the excitation ends. The buildup/decay time represents the memory time of the system during which the incoming signals can interfere. As any oscillator : It amplifies the effect of periodic signals at a resonant frequency It rejects perturbations out of resonance (it acts as a spectral filter)

9 Examples of resonators Mechanical watches : their oscillations measure time with a drift as small as 1 second/day ( ~10-5 ) Foucault s pendulum : it reveals earth rotation thanks to the large decay time of its oscillation Radio tuner : a tunable electronic resonant circuit filters out a communication channel from the oscillations of electrons in an antenna, excited by weak radio waves Quantum clocks : narrow transitions in cold and isolated atoms or molecules are exploited as ultra stable resonators (<10-14 ). Lasers : special resonators which include an active amplification which maintains the oscillation indefinitely. However a memory time applies given by decoherence from spontaneous emission

10 The optical resonator IN L~1m OUT Notes: 1) If R approaches 1 : modes get narrower 2) When intra-cavity losses are small : Transmission maxima approach 100% R = 1-T-Losses ~ 99,99% %T L=N λ Off resonance Finesse : F = FSR/δν ~ π/(1-r) FSR = c/2l δν 1/τ 2L=(N+1) λ 0 σ

11 Real life : Longitudinal & transverse modes When tuning a single-frequency laser, transmission by a cavity shows a periodic pattern of peaks : 1 out( ω) When looking at the profile of the cavity output beam : ω TEM 00 TEM 01 TEM 02 Peak intensities will depend on alignment and focusing (mode matching...) thus, different transverse modes are excited at different frequencies.

12 How to measure the cavity losses, thus the absorption spectra? Ring-down, transmission, (phase shift)

13 Cavity based absorption spectroscopy Miroir R~99.999% laser photodiode Gas sample CEAS CRDS Cavity transmission τ 0 lo n g u e u r d 'o n d e τ(ν) temps Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

14 CRDS & Cavity Enhanced CRDS : 1/τ = (A+T) c/l+ α(ν) c absolute measurement CEAS : I = I 2 α L T e (1 R e ) 0 α L 2 => I/I ~ (2F/π) α(ν) L value of τ is needed for F A, R, T = mirrors Absorption, Transmission, and Reflectivity L =cavity Length

15 Performance indicators in absorption spectroscopy 1 - Smallest detectable / noise-equivalent absorption (NEA*) : α min [cm -1 ] = r.m.s. noise in absorption spectrum The averaging time T is important: There is usually an optimum (stability time of the apparatus), then NEA increases 2 - Acquisition time: α min can be normalized by the square-root of T to obtain the NEA in 1 Hz bandwidth : α min [cm -1 Hz -1/2 ] = NEA * T 1/2 This is equal to the noise for 1s averaging if the system stability is longer 1s (usually so). 3 - Number of datapoints N in a spectrum. This provides a figure of merit : α min [cm -1 Hz -1/2 ] = NEA * T 1/2 / N 1/2 units are same as the previous indicator... Beware : this cannot be taken as an estimate of some smallest measurable absorption! NEA(1s) NEA(optimal) * Alternatively,the Minimum Detectable Absorption through the sample may be given : MDA = L x NEA

16 Different CEAS schemes : pulsed CRDS

17 Classic CRDS (pulsed laser) pulsed laser L gas (α) R+T+P=1 Detector Absorption par passage [ 10-6 ] At each pulse, fit exp(-γt) to the exp decay at cavity output to obtain photon lifetime τ = 1/γ γ = c (T+P)/L + c α time λ [nm] cavity output Loss per pass : ~ P+T ~ 10-5 Detectable limit : 1% => 10-7 /pass!! large spectral coverage!

18 Where are the cavity modes? Output spectrum (σ) = T cav (σ) x Input spectrum (σ) ν laser >>1/ t laser Cavity modes Intensity 1/ t C = c / 2L 1/ t laser typical ns laser spectrum Frequency /MHz Cavity output

19 CW-CRDS (swept-crds, or Cavity Leak-Out Spectroscopy CALOS)

20 Laser spectrum (CW, single-frequency) CRDS with a CW laser (CW-CRDS) frequency Cavity modes Cavity modulation by piezo translator I out Laser Phase noise Threshold T h r e s h ofor ld laser interruption Ring-down events time I out la s e r O N L a s e r O F F time Romanini et al. Chem Phys Lett264 (1997) 316

21 Passage through resonance : Monochromatic laser Ringing effects as a function of tuning speed Modeling cavity transmission η : tuning speed (adimensional)

22 Passage through resonance : Tuning speed effect... κ=10 Injection Efficiency I out /I in single event averaged profile <200> time [τ rd ] η=10-1 η= η=10 1 Single-mode injection using faster and faster frequency sweeps Injection Efficiency I out / I in κ : ratio of laser to cavity mode linewidth η : normalized tuning speed κ= single event averaged profile <200> monochromatic field η=10 2 η= time [τ rd ] Morville et al. Appl Opt 41 (2002) 6980

23 Fast CRDS 2 ms! He and Orr Appl. Phys. B 79 (2004) 941 Debecker et al. Optics Express 13 (2005) 2906

24 The fibered CW CRDS spectrometer at Grenoble (1200~1800 nm) 6 nm/diode 70 diodes Diode laser Lambda meter ν=f(t,i) laser ON Laser OFF Threshold Optical Isolator Tap coupler Fast switch (acousto-optic) Optical cavity photodiode

25 The N 2 challenge N 2 predictions : Li & Le Roy, JCP 126 (2007)

26 Spectra averaging over 5 days

27 S(4) (3-0) of N S~ cm/mol

28 Frequency stabilized CW-CRDS High precision spectroscopy of lineshapes The cavity length is referenced to a stable HeNe laser, so each ringdown event is precisely defined in frequency. This also reduces drifts and allows longer averaging with white noise dependence => talk on Tuesday Lisak, Hodges, and Ciurylo PRA 73 (2006) 1 13

29 Towards an ultimate spectrometer Atmosphere: very accurate line profile study Environment: accurate isotopic ratio Fundamental physics: k B constant Sustainable handbooks: precision spectroscopy Burkart, Romanini, Kassi Opt.Lett. 38 (2013) 2062

30 ICOS (swept CEAS) & off-axis ICOS The first is basic and has basic performance too. The second has excellent performance but it is not well explained in the literature (commercial developments!)

31 Optical-Feedback CEAS (& CRDS) NICE OHMS => Talks on Wednesday and today

32 Cavity injection by Optical Feedback (OF) V-cavity : OF at resonance φ OF κ = P OF /P in Diode Laser Direct reflection OF 1.5 Cavity output Power input Fast & optimized TEM 00 modes injection Mode-by-mode freq. calibrated spectra Ringdown calibration of absorption scale Photodet. signals (V) => talk on Wednesday time (ms) Morville et al. APB 80 (2005) 1027 Ringdown

33 Noise-Immune Cavity-Enhanced Optical Heterodyne Molecular Spectroscopy F = 100,000 Laser locked to 1mHz rel. linewidth! L = 47cm α min (1s)= /cm => next talk Ye, Ma, Hall JOSAB 15 (1998) 6

34 BB-CEAS Increasing interest for Broad Band coverage for several applications. More spectral resolution => less light per spectral element! Spectral quality and stability of the BB source is primordial: Dye lasers and lamps are not very good, contrary to LEDs and ML lasers. ML lasers have high beam quality (mode matching ), allow large spectral coverage by nonlinear optics (harmonic or parametric generation, fibers ), and produce a comb of frequencies!

35 Wavelength Multiplexed Spectroscopy Transmission broad-band modelocked LASER sample gas CCD array laser frequency

36 CEAS with a lamp Fiedler et al. CPL 382 (2003) 447

37 CEAS with a LED Ball, Langridge and Jones CPL 398 (2004) 68

38 Comb CEAS general comments and first demonstration (back in 2002) See other talks on new developments

39 Spectrum of a mode-locked laser... a coherent ensemble of single-frequency lasers Time domain : Periodic train of pulses δt t 1/δt Mode spacing 1/ t Fourier T. => Spectrum of mode-locked laser Typically a ML spectrum has ~10 5 modes

40 Spectrum of a mode-locked laser A closer look

41 Cavity transmission spectrum Comb-CEAS basic idea Modelocked laser spectrum Output Spectrum = T cav x Input Spectrum The spectrum transmitted by the cavity depends on the overlap of the two combs of modes : by changing the cavity length, we observe comb beatings, with different periods When combs are in tune, the laser spectrum is efficiently transmitted without beatings => Magic point

42 CEAS with a Mode-Locked laser : first demo Millennia pump laser, 5W Ti:Sa 100fs, 80Mhz optical isolator L 1 Photodiode M 2 PinHole M 1 L 2 PZT Spectrograph Translation stage M 1,2 : high reflectors around 800 nm CCD Gherman and Romanini, Opt. Expr. 10 (2002) 1033

43 Beating between mode combs µm 500µm Transmitted spectra for different displacements of cavity length from the «magic point» ( smaller peaks are from transverse cavity modes ) µm Wavelength [nm] 00 µm Gherman and Romanini, Opt. Expr. 10 (2002) 1033

44 Cavity transmission as a function of cavity length µm µm distance from «magic point» «magic point» 20 µm NOTE: When looking at these signals on a fast timescale, one can recover the pulse train again µm Time [ms] ( Cavity length tuning by a PZT ) Gherman and Romanini, Opt. Expr. 10 (2002) 1033

45 Why we see more than one comb resonances? 1 f=0 frequency RF THz Mid IR Near IR Laser emission fine cavity tuning by piezo These secondary resonances have different intensity : Dispersion + f0

46 ML-CEAS : A first demonstration laser spectrum Spectrum transmitted by cavity filled with air Spectrum transmitted by cavity filled with HCCH nm Moderate cavity finesse F~360 (effective absorption length F x L /π 120 m) Cavity modulated by ~1KHz Acquisition time ~ 10 ms (averaging a few passages through resonance) Gherman and Romanini, Opt. Expr. 10 (2002) 1033

47 ML-CEAS : Conclusions Robust, simple, spectrally multiplexed technique Real-time, high sensitivity (10-10 /cm/hz 1/2 per spectral element) Quantitative (calibration of cavity finesse by ringdown) Access to the UV (efficient frequency upconversion) Cavity modulation is robust and avoids cavity dispersion effects More schemes of comb-ceas have been developed since. see other talks in this conference!

48 Acknowledgements. All my collaborators and more III-V labs