INF 5490 RF MEMS. LN10: Micromechanical filters. Spring 2011, Oddvar Søråsen Jan Erik Ramstad Department of Informatics, UoO

Transcription

1 INF 5490 RF MEMS LN10: Micromechanical filters Spring 2011, Oddvar Søråsen Jan Erik Ramstad Department of Informatics, UoO 1

2 Today s lecture Properties of mechanical filters Visualization and working principle Modeling Examples Design procedure Mixer 2

3 Mechanical filters Well-known for several decades Jmfr. book: Mechanical filters in electronics, R.A. Johnson, 1983 Miniaturization of mechanical filters makes it more interesting to use Possible by using micromachining Motivation Fabrication of small integrated filters: system-on-chip with good filter performance 3

4 Filter response 4

5 Several resonators used One single resonator has a narrow BPresponse Good for defining i oscillator frequency Not good for BP-filter BP-filters are implemented by coupling resonators in cascade Gives a wider pass band than using one single resonating structure 2 or more micro resonators are used Each of comb type or c-c beam type (or other types) Connected by soft springs 5

6 Filter order Number of resonators, n, defines the filter order Order = 2 * n Sharper roll-off to stop band when several resonators are used sharper filter 6

7 Micromachined filter properties + Compact implementation ti on-chip filter bank possible + High Q-factor can be obtained + Low-loss BP-filters can be implemented The individual resonators have low loss Low total Insertion loss, IL IL: Degraded for small bandwidth IL: Improved for high Q-factor 7

8 Insertion loss IL: Degraded for small bandwidth 8

9 IL: Improved for high Q-factor 9

10 Mechanical model A coupled resonator system has several vibration modes n independent resonators Resonates at their natural frequencies determined by m, k compliant (soft) coupling springs Determine the resulting resonance modes of the many-body system 10

11 Visualization of the working principle 2 oscillation modes In phase: No relative displacement between masses No force from coupling spring Oscillation frequency = natural frequency for a single resonator (both are equal, - mass less coupling spring*) (* actual coupling spring mass can lower the frequency) 11

12 Visualization of the working principle Out of phase: Displacement in opposite directions Force from coupling spring (added force) Gives a higher oscillation frequency (Newton s 2.law, F=ma) the 2 overlapping resonance frequencies are split into 2 distinct frequencies 12

13 3-resonator structure Each vibration mode corresponds to a distinct top in the frequency response Lowest frequency: all in phase Middle frequency: center not moving, ends out of phase Highest frequency: each 180 degrees out of phase with neighbour 13

14 Illustrating principle: 3 * resonators 14

15 Mechanical or electrical design? Much similarity il it between description of mechanical and electrical systems The dual circuit to a spring-mass-damper system is a LC-ladder network Electromechanical analogy used for conversion Each resonator a LCR tank Each coupling spring (idealized massless) corresponds to a shunt capacitance 15

16 Modeling Systems can be modeled and designed in electrical domain by using procedures from coupled resonator ladder filters All polynomial syntheses methods from electrical filter design can be used A large number of syntheses methods and tables excist + electrical circuit it simulators Butterworth, Chebyshev -filters Possible procedure: Full synthesis in the electrical domain and conversion to mechanical domain as the last step LC-elements are mapped to lumped mechanical elements Possible, but generally not recommended knowledge from both electrical and mechanical domains should be used for optimal filter design 16

17 2-resonator HF-VHF micromechanical filter The coupled resonator filter may be classified as a 2-port: Two c-c c beams 0.1 μm over substrate Determined by thickness of sacrificial oxide Soft coupling spring polysi stripes under each resonator electrodes Vibrations normal to substrate DC voltage applied polysi at the edges function as tuning electrodes ( beam-softening ) 17

18 Resistors AC-signal on input electrode through R Q 1 R Q1 reduces overall Q and makes the pass band more flat Matched impedance at output, t R Q2 R s may be tailored to specific applications e.g. may be adjusted for interfacing to a following LNA 18

19 Mechanical signal processing This unit shows: Signal processing can be done in the mechanical domain Electrical input signal is converted to force By capacitive input transducer Mechanical displacements (vibrations) are induced in x- direction due to the varying force The resulting mechanical signal is then processed in the mechanical domain Reject if outside pass band Passed if inside pass band 19

20 Mechanical signal processing, contd. The mechanically processed signal manifests itself as movement of the output transducer The movement is converted to electrical energy Output current i0 = Vd * dc/dt micromechanical ca signal processor The electrical signal can be further processed by succeeding transceiver stages 20

21 BP-filter using 2 c-c beam resonators 21

22 22

23 Filter response Frequency separation depends on the stiffness of the coupling spring Soft spring ( compliant ) close frequencies = narrow pass band Increased number of coupled resonators in a linear chain gives Wider pass band Increased number of passband ripples the total number of oscillation modes are equal to the number of coupled resonators in the chain 23

24 24

25 Filter design Resonators used in micromechanical i filters are normally identical Same dimension and resonance frequency Filter centre frequency is f0 (if massless coupling spring ) Pass band determined by max distance between node tops Relative position of vibration tops is determined by k k sij Coupling spring stiffness Resonator properties (spring constant) at coupling points k r 25

26 Design, contd. At centre frequency f0 and bandwidth B, spring constants must fulfill k ij f k k ij k B 0 = normalized coupling coefficient taken from filter cook books k sij Ratio important, t NOT absolute values kr Theoretical design procedure A* (* can not be implemented in practice) f 0 k k Determine and Choose for required BW I real life this procedure is modified (procedure B ) r sij sij r 26

27 Design procedures c-c c beam filter A. Design resonators first This will give constraints for selecting the stiffness of the coupling beam but bandwidth B can not be chosen freely! or B. Design coupling beam spring constant first Determine the spring constant the resonator must have for a given BW this determines the coupling points! 27

28 Design procedure A. A1. Determine resonator geometry for a given frequency and a specific material (ρ) Calculate beam-length (Lr), thickness (h) and gap (d) using equations for f0 and terminating resistors (RQ) If filter is symmetric and Q_resonator >> Q_filter, a simplified model for the resistors may be used 28

29 For a specific resonator frequency, geometry is determined by: E h 1 k e f0 const 1 2 L r k m 1/ 2 h L : determined from f requirement W, r 0 r, W e : chosen as practical as possible Added requirement : R R Q k re 0 q Q 1 filter 2 e, Q Q res Q filter k re : given by resonator dimensions : is given q 1 Q 0 : from filter cook book filter : is given C VP e VP : only possible variation 2 x d V : has limitations P d : can be changed! (e, is centre position of beam) 29

30 Design-procedure A, contd. A2. Choose a realistic width of fthe coupling beam W s12 Length of coupling beam should be a quarter wavelength of the filter centre frequency Coupling springs are in general transmission lines The filter will not be very sensitive to dimensional variations of the coupling beam if a quarter wavelength Quarter wavelength requirement determines the length of the coupling beam L s12 30

31 Design procedure A, contd. Constraints on width, thickness and length determines the coupling spring constant k k s12 This limits the possibility to set the bandwidth independently (BW depends on the coupling spring constant) f k 0 s12 B k12 krc An alternative method for determining the filterbandwidth is needed see design procedure B 31

32 Design procedure B B1. Use coupling points on the resonator to determine filter bandwidth BW determined by the ratio ks 12 k is the value of k at the coupling point! k rc position dependent, especially of the speed at the position k rc can be selected by choosing a proper coupling point rc of resonator beam! The dynamic spring constant for a c-c beam is largest nearby the anchors k rc is larger for smaller speed of coupling point at resonance k rc k rc 32

33 Smaller speed Max. speed const 0 m eff KE 1 v 2 k m eff eff 2 Smaller speed eff. mass higher eff. spring stiffness higher 2 33

34 Positioning of coupling beam So: filter bandwidth can be found by choosing a value of fulfilling the equation k r k sij f k B 0 ij k k where is given by the quarter wavelength requirement Choice of coupling point of resonator beam influences on the bandwidth of the mechanical filter sij r 34

35 Position of coupling beam 35

36 Design-procedure, contd. B2. Generate a complete equivalent circuit it for the whole filter structure and verify using a circuit simulator Equivalent circuit for 2-resonator filter Each resonator is modeled as shown before Coupling beam operates as an acoustic transmission line and is modeled as a T-network of energy storing elements Transformers are placed in-between resonator and coupling beam circuit to model velocity transformations that take place when coupling beam is connected at positions outside the resonator beam centre 36

37 37

38 HF micromechanical filter Coupling position SEM of symmetric filter : 7.81 MHz l_c was adjusted to obtain the required Resonators consist of phosphor doped poly bandwidth Torsion rotation of coupling beam may also influence the mechanical coupling Effective value of l_c changes 38

39 HF micromechanical filter Measured and simulated frequency response BW = 18 khz, Insertion loss = 1.8 db, Q_filter = 435 Simulation and experimental results match well in pass band Large difference in the transition region to the stop band In a real filter poles that are not modeled, are introduced. They improve the filter shape factor, -due to the feedthrough capacitance C_p between input and output electrodes (parasitic element). For fully integrated t filters this capacitance can be controlled and the position of the poles can be chosen such that they contribute to a optimized filter performance 39

40 Comb structure Both series and parallel configurations can be used In figure 5.11.b the output currents are added 40

41 Comb-structure, contd. Resonators designed d for having different resonance frequencies Model taken from Varadan p : Model assumes a massless coupling beam. Possible to ignore the influence of the mass on the filter performance if the coupling beam length is a quarter wavelength of the centre frequency Formulas inaccurate for high frequencies and small dimensions Better method: Use advanced simulation tools f 2 f 1 f 1 Q 1 41

42 Filter implemented using comb structure 42

43 43

44 44

45 Micromechanical mixer filters A 2 c-c beam structure can be modified to be a mixer Suppose input signals on both on v_e (electrode) and v_b (beam) Fig Itoh, shows schematic for a symmetric micromechanical mixer-filter-structure 45

46 46

47 Mixer v RF electrode on Suppose v v LO b RF Force calculated: on beam, oscillator Suppose local t V v v x C v v v v x C v v F e e b b b e d cos ) 2 ( 2 1 ) ( Suppose : C V V F t V v v t V v v LO LO LO b RF RF RF e 2 1 cos cos Suppose : t t t t t t x C V V F RF LO RF LO d ] ) cos( ) cos( cos 2cos cos cos [where... t F t x C V V F LO RF LO RF d cos ) cos( F IFt d cos

48 Micromechanical mixer filters, contd. Summary of calculations l Start with a non-linear relationship between voltage and force: voltage/force characteristic (square) Linearization: Vp suppresses non-linearity Voltage signals v_rf and v_lo are mixed down to intermediate t frequency (force), ω_if = difference between frequencies! Transducer no. 1 can couple the signal into the following resonator If transducer no. 2 is designed as a micromechanical BP filter with centre frequency ω_ IF,, we will get an effective mixer-filter structure 48

49 Micromechanical mixer-filter, contd. Mixer structure is a functional-block in a RFsystem (future lecture) This is a component that t may replace present mixer + IFfilter (intermediate-filter) Lower contact-loss between parts and ideally zero DC power consumption A non-conducting coupling beam is used for isolating the IF- port (e.g. 2. beam) from LO (local oscillator) 49

50 Mixer-filters using square-frame resonators Made using a post-cmos process Laterally moving structures Examples from research at the Nanoelectronics group 50

51 51 FFSFR architecture

52 52 Free-free Square Frame Resonator

53 FFSFR w/self-assembly electrodes V LO A 4μm 18μm 1.8μm A V RF A A 53

54 FFSFR filter design 45 support beams Can be used as a 45 coupling beam 54

55 55 4th order FFSFR mechanical filter

56 SEM pictures - 6th order FFSFR 56

57 2 Mechanically coupled FFSFR MODE 1 MODE 2 Bandwidth = 71.6 khz fc = MHz 57

58 3 Mechanically coupled FFSFR MODE 1 MODE 2 MODE 3 Bandwidth = khz fc = MHz 58

59 59 Simulation results