World coverage for single station lightning detection
|
|
- Anabel Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 46,, doi: /2010rs004600, 2011 World coverage for single station lightning detection C. Mackay 1 and A. C. Fraser Smith 1 Received 8 December 2010; revised 3 March 2011; accepted 14 March 2011; published 25 May [1] This paper analyzes the possibility of using single station measurements of low frequency electromagnetic waves to locate lightning occurring around much, and possibly all, of the world. The electromagnetic waves generated by lightning, which propagate through the Earth ionosphere waveguide, are known as sferics. We combine a direction finding algorithm to compute the arrival azimuth of the recorded sferic along with a distance of propagation estimate to deduce the location of the lightning. While the methodology used for estimating the distance of propagation is described by Mackay and Fraser Smith (2010), this paper analyzes the effectiveness of the method. We examine the limitations including those independent of station location and performance, and those which are station dependent. We analyze the geographic coverage attained from a single station along with the percentage of lightning emitting sferics that are recorded at the station and available for computing the lightning locations. Citation: Mackay, C., and A. C. Fraser Smith (2011), World coverage for single station lightning detection, Radio Sci., 46,, doi: /2010rs Introduction [2] The purpose of this paper is to analyze the global coverage and effectiveness of a single station lightning location method. The single station method analyzed is described in detail by Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010]. For this method, magnetic fields are recorded on the Earth s surface at frequencies in the extremely low frequencies (ELF; Hz) and very low frequencies (VLF; 3 30 khz). Two crossed loop antennas are employed to measure the magnetic field in the north south and east west directions. Lightning can be modeled as a vertical dipole with the current passing through it resembling an impulse waveform. A broad range of frequencies of electromagnetic waves are excited by this impulse. The higher frequencies dissipate into the ionosphere, while the lower frequencies, such as the VLF and ELF waves, are trapped between the Earth s surface and the lower ionosphere and propagate along through this waveguide. Remote stations record the electromagnetic waves emitted by the lightning which forms asignalknownasasferic.intheworkofmackay and Fraser Smith [2010] the ELF portion of the sferic, or the slow tail, is used to compute the distance between the causal lightning and the recording station using the propagation model described by Wait [1960a]. With a direction finding algorithm and this computed distance, the lightning location can be deduced from a single station. With recorded data from a single site, we hope to cover a large portion of the world s lightning. We discuss the limitations of this method along with the lightning location results attained from two 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union /11/2010RS different sites: Søndrestrøm, Greenland (66.99 N, W) and Palmer, Antarctica (64.77 S, W). [3] To discuss lightning location algorithms, it is helpful to know where lightning is occurring around the globe. In Figure 1 [Christian, 1999], we see the average number of lightning per hour per km 2 occurring around the world. Lightning occurs much more frequently over land than water, with central Africa having the highest frequency of lightning year round. The global distribution of lightning changes with the seasons. Lightning occurs more in the northern hemisphere during the northern summer months and more in the southern hemisphere during the northern winter. There is also a diurnal variation. Figure 2 from Mackerras et al. [1998] shows that over land, where most of the lightning falls, there is an increase during the local afternoon. With an abundance of signals from lightning to record, we hope to observe the distinct geographic and diurnal variation by analyzing data recorded from a single station. 2. Existing Lightning Detection Methods [4] There exist a variety of methods to locate lightning remotely. Most involve measuring either the optical emissions from lightning, or the electromagnetic waves propagating along the Earth ionosphere waveguide. The data from Figure 1 were acquired by two satellite instruments. The satellite data are from the Optical Transient Detector, OTD, and the Lightning Imaging Sensor, LIS. OTD, being the predecessor to LIS, is no longer recording data. Both systems detect lightning occurring below the orbital path by measuring the optical emissions from the lightning. This results in very accurate and complete lightning detection in the limited field of view of the satellite. With many years in orbit, satellite lightning detection is very well suited for calculating the general distribution of lightning and lightning storm flash rate rather than real time global lightning 1of9
2 to locate lightning with a single station is known as the Kharkov method [Brundell et al., 2002; Rafalsky et al., 1995a, 1995b]. This method examines the propagation in the TE 1 mode, from around 1850 Hz to 3400 Hz. This requires a strong signal in the specified frequency range, limiting the distance of propagation of the sferic when applying this method. In the work of Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010], we deduced the distance of propagation by analyzing the slow tail of the sferic. This method can be used for sferics propagating over a wide variety of distances. Figure 1. Average world lightning distribution. detection for individual lightning. The optical sensor also has the advantage of sensing cloud to ground along with cloud to cloud lightning. Thomas et al. [2000] showed the cloud to ground discharges that were confined to mid and lower altitudes were less well detected by the LIS system than intracloud discharges. [5] There also exist different ground based methods for lightning detection. The ground based methods limit the sensitivity to cloud to ground, or vertical, lightning. Some methods are based on electromagnetic data recorded at multiple stations. Many previous methods require VLF measurements from multiple stations [e.g., Lee, 1986; Cummins et al., 1998; Dowden et al., 2002; Said et al., 2010]. Multiple station measurements at ELF have also been used, as described by Füllekrug and Constable [2000]. With data from multiple stations, the methods for locating lightning can vary. Some of these methods include using the difference in arrival times of sferics at different sites, or triangulation involving direction measurements of the incoming signal. Using multiple stations is an effective way to locate lightning but applying this method requires access and maintenance to simultaneous data from multiple station, with these stations having precise timing and calibration. [6] Previous work has also tackled lightning location using electromagnetic measurements from a single station. J.R. Wait developed a theory to approximate the propagation distance of the sferic, r, using a single station measurement by modeling the slowtail [Wait, 1960a]. The separation time between the start of the sferic and the first quarter cycle of the slow tail is known aspthe ffiffiffi slow tail separation, t s. Wait showed theoretically that t s is linearly dependent on r by the following equation: t s ¼ 0:09 rffiffiffiffi 0 p þ ffiffi 2 2h ð1þ where s i is the ionosphere conductivity, h is the height of the ionosphere, and d is a factor describing the pulse width (in seconds) of the lightning s current moment. When measurements of the electric field are available, distance approximation from a single station is possible by measuring the wave impedance, or the ratio of the electric and magnetic field [Burke and Jones, 1995]. A different method i 3. Distance Estimation [7] In this section we will review the methodology for estimating the distance of propagation between lightning and recording station. A more thorough demonstration of the method is available in the work of Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010]. We begin by applying the modal equations described by Wait [1960a] which represent the propagation of ELF and VLF electromagnetic waves through a model of the Earth ionosphere waveguide. In this model, the Earth is a perfect conductor and the ionosphereis a uniform isotropic layer with a sharp lower boundary. The method analyzes the propagation of the slow tail or ELF portion of lightning induced sferic which lies in the lowest order mode. The equations representing this mode are below: H r;0 ð! Þ ffi Figure 2. P s ð! Þ ¼ Z p s ðþe t i!t dt =R 1=2 E P s i! 1=2 <S ð 0 Þ 1=2 e sinð=r E Þ 2h 2c S 0 ð! Þ ¼ ð2þ i! ð S0þ1 Þ=c ð3þ 1 þ c! 1=2 1=2 0 ð4þ h i i! Z h r;0 ðþ¼ t H r;0 e i!t d! Diurnal variation of lightning over land. ð5þ 2of9
3 Figure 3. Illustration describing the direction finding algorithm. where p s is the current moment at the lightning source, r is the distance of propagation, h is the height of the ionosphere, s i is the conductivity of the ionosphere, and h r,0 is the magnetic field in the lowest waveguide mode at the receiver. In the work of Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010] we used the inverse of these equations to compute an average current moment p s calculated from several sferics corresponding to lightning with known locations. To deduce the distance of propagation for a sferic originating from a lightning with an unknown location, we use the recorded slow tail. We then compute different possible current moments, p s, by iterating over a full range of possible distances of propagation. r is estimated to be the distance corresponding to the computed source with the highest correlation to the average source. [8] The modal equations describe a uniform waveguide, where h and s i are assigned different values during daytime or nighttime. For sferics propagating across the day night terminator, Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010] applies adjusted values for h and s i to the uniform waveguide model. In the work of Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010], we analyzed the accuracy of this method and found the errors in the estimation of r to have a standard deviation of approximately 9% of the actual distance for sferics propagating in day, night, and mixed paths. Each of these impose limitations on the technique. First, both sections of the methodology are limited in accuracy. Second, for the distance estimation we require a clean slow tail recorded at the station. Last, for the direction estimation, there remains a 180 ambiguity in the direction estimate. These limitations exist regardless of the station used to collect the data Limitations in Accuracy [11] The error analysis from Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010] compared lightning located from sferics recorded at Søndrestrøm station to lightning locations from NLDN. Figure 4 shows the lightning location attained using the two different methods. The NLDN median location error is approximately 1 km for lightning occurring in the United States [Rakov and Uman, 2003]. World lightning location networks using multiple stations achieve lightning location with an uncertainty of around 5 10 km [Dowden et al., 4. Direction Estimation [9] For this paper, we find the azimuth of the sferic by analyzing the VLF portion of the sferic as in the work of Said et al. [2010]. To do so, we begin by taking a band pass filter around the VLF frequencies for the north south and east west recordings of a sferic. We then isolate the data containing the peak of the VLF and plot the north south data against the east west data as shown in Figure 3. We find a best fit line to fit the north south and east west points and compute its slope. From the slope we can deduce the arrival azimuth of the signal. 5. Station Independent Limitations [10] In sections 3 and 4, we discuss locating lightning in two sections: distance estimation and direction estimation. Figure 4. Map showing lightning located by NLDN and the same lightning located using our method. 3of9
4 overlapping slow tails. The interference caused by the overlap causes unreliable results when applying our distance estimation. This calculation was done for 48 time series of recorded data from Søndrestrøm station. Each sample was taken at a half an hour interval with a duration of 14 s. In Figure 5, we see adistinct daily variation in the number of sferics recorded at Søndrestrøm, however the percent of useable sferics does not follow the same variation and averages 70% rather consistently throughout the day. Figure 5. Total number of sferics recorded and percentage of useable sferics for each 14 s data file. 2002; Said et al., 2010]. Though the method described in this paper improves on range and accuracy of other existing single station lightning detection methods, it cannot achieve the same accuracy as a large multiple station network. For the lightning shown in Figure 4, the median error for direction estimation is 2, and the median distance estimation error is 270 km. The distance estimation accuracy is limited by the assumption that the source for the slowtail, or the current moment, has the same form for all lightning. As demonstrated in Figure 4, a single station is capable of accurately locating lightning storm regions by combining the measurements of each individual lightning within the storm Percentage of Sferics With Clean Slow Tails [12] In the work of Mackay and Fraser Smith [2010] we mention using only large and clean sferics. The reason for specifying large sferics is to ensure that the sferic is strong enough to be recorded at the station. The clean sferics are specified to exclude sferics where there is interference with other recorded sferics during the slow tail signal used to compute the distance estimate. In this section we examine the percentage of recorded sferics that are deemed useable for our distance estimation method. [13] We will begin by calculating the percentage of useable sferics out of all the recorded sferics from a section of recorded data. Then we will look at multiple segments of data throughout a whole day to arrive at an average percent of useable sferics. For each length of recorded data, we start by picking out all the recorded sferics. To do this, we pass the data through a band pass filter to select the VLF frequency range. Then, we take the envelope of the VLF data. Each peak of the envelope over the noise level is considered it s own sferic. Now that we have picked out all the sferics, we can measure the difference in recorded time between adjacent sferics. Sferics arriving within 5 ms will have 5.3. Arrival Azimuth Ambiguity [14] In section 4, we explained the method of estimating the direction of propagation of a recorded sferic. However, this method leaves us with a 180 ambiguity. There are different options to either resolve or accommodate for the ambiguity. [15] The first option to resolve the ambiguity is to use data from a second station. With only the azimuth estimate from two different stations, we can draw the two great circles which cross each of the stations. These two tracks intersect at two points. With distance estimates calculated from each station we can resolve which of two intersecting points is the lightning location. As this paper describes single station lightning location, we will not use a second station to resolve the azimuth ambiguity. However if a second station is available, the additional data will resolve the problem. [16] Previous papers have resolved the ambiguity when an electric dipole antenna is available to record the vertical electric field [Brundell et al., 2002]. When the electric field is recorded the azimuth calculation is done differently from section 4. Instead of calculating the slope of the two magnetic field measurements, you calculate the slope of the computed Poynting s vector. By calculating Poynting s vector, P = E H, the electric field will be found to be either in or 180 out of phase with the magnetic field, moving all the Poynting s vector points into a single quadrant and resolving the 180 ambiguity. The data we are using for this paper does not include electric field measurements and so we chose to deal with the azimuth ambiguity in a different manner. [17] The simplest solution when no additional data are available is to make an educated guess. If the two possibilities has the first location fall in a higher lightning frequency occurrence area than the second location, the first location is more likely. From Figure 1, we can calculate the probability distribution of lightning occurring over the world and calculate the probability that the lightning occurred at each location. [18] When we estimate the distance of propagation, we require a single recording of the slow tail. To obtain a strong slow tail, we multiply the north south recording by the cosine of the estimated azimuth, and the east west recording by the Table 1. Conductivities, s g, and Attenuation Values, a n, for Earth Surface n Surface s g (S/m) a n (km 1 ) 1 seawater Earth s crust sea ice glacial ice of9
5 Figure 6. Simple model of different ground conductivities. technique described in section 3 can be used for both types. We can include the 90% chance that a sferic is from a negative cloud to ground lightning when calculating the probability the sferic originated from both possible locations to improve our 180 ambiguity resolution. 6. Station Dependent Limitations [19] With the model described in section 3, a lightning location can be pinpointed only if the corresponding sferic was recorded by a station. Depending on a station location and its receiver s signal to noise ratio, different stations will be able to record different sferics. A quiet station with high signal to noise ratio will be able to record sferics propagating a longer distance and originating from weaker signals than a noisier receiver at the same location. The location of the station also affects which sferics are recorded. Two stations with the same signal to noise ratio may not cover the same area if sferics must propagate over higher attenuating surfaces to reach one of the stations. sine of the azimuth and combine the two. For this process, we assume the azimuth is between 90 to 90. Negative cloud to ground lightning belonging to that hemisphere will give computed current moments with positive correlations to our average current moment (which was calculated using lightning from the same hemisphere), while positive cloudto ground lightning from the same hemisphere will produce negative correlations. If the lightning is from the opposite hemisphere, we will have a negative correlation for a negative flash, and a positive correlation for a positive flash. Therefore if we know a sferic propagated from a negative or positive lightning, we can resolve the 180 ambiguity by examining whether the current moment correlation is positive or negative. It is thought that less than 10% of cloudto ground lightning are positive cloud to ground lightning [Rakov and Uman, 2003]. The slow tails produced by both types of lightning undergo the same dispersion in the Earthionosphere waveguide, and therefore the distance estimation 6.1. Attenuation to Location [20] The signals propagating within a waveguide attenuate at a rate given by exp( ar), where a is the attenuation factor. Equation (3) shows that the attenuation rate for the model waveguide we are using is a = < (iws 0 /c). In section 3, we assume the ground is a perfect conductor. This assumption is valid when the ionospheric conductivity is much lower than the ground conductivity. However, propagation over Antarctic ice has been shown to greatly attenuate VLF signals [Chevalier et al., 2006; Rogers and Peden, 1975]. If we remove the assumption that the ground conductivity is significantly higher than the ionosphere conductivity, S 0 from equation (4) can be described as in the work of Wait [1960b] by: " S 0 ¼ 1 þ c 1=2 0 þ #! 1=2 1=2 0 h i i! i g! ð6þ Figure 7. Attenuation of 1 khz signals to Palmer and Søndrestrøm stations. 5of9
6 Figure 8. VLF power versus peak current attenuation for noise threshold and sferic measurements at Palmer and Søndrestrøm stations. [21] To see the effects of different ground surfaces on our sferics, we create a very general model of the Earth. We break up the Earth s surface into four classes of materials: seawater, Earth s crust, glacial ice, and sea ice. The four materials have the approximate conductivities shown in the Table 1. [22] In Figure 6, we show a world map with the different ground conductivities. A signal of a certain frequency propagating for r n kilometers over a surface of type n, will be attenuated by exp( a n r n ). In calculating a n we approximate h and s i as averages of the day and night values. Modeling a signal propagating over multiple surfaces, or a nonuniform waveguide, is complicated. To simplify, we will approximate the total attenuation to be exp( P4 a n r n ). We n¼1 can now calculate an approximate, representative attenuation from any point in the world to the station for a single frequency. Figure 7 shows the attenuation of a 1 khz signal to two different stations. Note how the Antarctic ice greatly reduces the sensitivity of the Palmer station to lightning over Asia and Australasia Noise Threshold Limitation [23] The receiver at any particular station will have a threshold noise level, and the sferic power must be higher than the noise level for that sferic to be detectable. In general, each receiver will have a different threshold. We set this noise threshold of a station to be the measured VLF power from recorded data containing no sferics. By using a data set consisting of lightning with known locations, time of occurrences and peak currents, we can compare the VLF power of the corresponding recorded sferics to the computed noise threshold level. The comparison allows us to measure the sensitivity of the station. For our purposes, we will use the National Lightning Detection Network, or NLDN, data set [Cummins et al., 1998]. We then measure the VLF power from the segment of data corresponding to when the sferic would have, or has arrived, at the station. The lightning Figure 9. Percent of lightning expected to be covered by each station. 6of9
7 Figure 10. Location of lightning recorded at Søndrestrøm from a single full day. corresponding with VLF power around or below the noise threshold are considered undetectable. In Figure 8, we plot the VLF power recorded at the Palmer and Søndrestrøm sites for every NLDN lightning and compare it to the peak current and the attenuation between the lightning s location and the station. The attenuation is computed as in section 6.1. [24] The VLF noise power for the Palmer and Søndrestrøm stations are very different. Many of the sferics at Søndrestrøm fall below the noise cutoff, while most of the sferics at Palmer are above the cutoff. From equation (3), we expect the magnitude of the magnetic field to be proportional to I p e ar, where I p is the peak current recorded by NLDN. The magnitude of the electric field follows the same form. Therefore, we expect: Power = E H / I 2 e ( 2ar). In Figure 8, we draw a line in each plot to approximate the noise power cutoff in terms of peak current and attenuation. With the attenuation maps computed in Figure 7, we can compute the peak current required for lightning from different locations to emit sferics strong enough to be recorded at that station. Using the NLDN data as an average distribution of peak current for lightning occurring around the world, we can take any location on the world map and convert the cutoff peak current into the percent of lightning at or above the cutoff. In Figure 9 we show the coverage maps for the two stations. The lower noise threshold for Palmer gives it much better coverage than Søndrestrøm despite Figure 7 showing that sferics undergo higher attenuation from more locations before being recorded at Palmer. 7. Results [25] To analyze the limitations discussed in sections 6.1 and 6.2, we will compare the computed location of lightning from a single station, using the methodology from sections 3 and 4, with a map of the expected lightning distribution visible from that station. The expected distribution is computed by modifying the worldwide lightning distribution from Figure 1 to account for each of the limitations. We examine lightning data recorded from two stations, Søndrestrøm and Palmer. [26] Søndrestrøm data were recorded in 14 s increments every half hour. We combine the sferics recorded in 48 consecutive data files which span the whole day of 29 July 2004 and plot the computed location of the lightning in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows the distribution of lightning we expect to be visible from Søndrestrøm station over the same time period. Figure 11 is obtained by combining the coverage in Figure 9 with the satellite data from Christian [1999] showing the world distribution of lightning in the month of July. We then reduce the expected overall lightning by 30% to take into account the unusable sferics described in section 5.2. Rakov and Uman [2003] estimates that approximately three quarters of lightning discharges do not contact the ground, therefore we also reduce the total number of expected detected lightning by 75% to eliminate the cloudto cloud lightning visible with the satellite and not with our method. We can now compare the computed geographical distribution in Figure 10 to the expected distribution shown in Figure 11. We find the computed locations of the lightning along with the total number of detected lightning match quite closely with the expected distribution. [27] For Palmer, we analyze 1 min segments of data recorded throughout the same day, 29 July This allows us to observe the diurnal variation described in section 1. In Figure 12 we show the location of lightning computed from the data recorded at Palmer, along with the expected distribution of lightning for a July day at the corresponding time. The expected distribution for Palmer data was computed in the same way as for Søndrestrøm, except that the average July lightning distribution is modified using the curve from Figure 2 to include the expected diurnal variation. We find the variance in the location and the quantity of lightning detected by the Palmer station at different times in the day follows our expected distribution. The total number of lightning detected is higher than Figure 11. Average distribution of lightning as seen from Søndrestrøm station. 7of9
8 Figure 12. Location of lightning recorded at Palmer in 1 min increments throughout a full day. 8of9
9 expected but with such short increments of data the difference is not significant. 8. Conclusions [28] Using slow tail measurements, a single ELF/VLF recording station can locate lightning over a large portion of the globe, as seen with data from Palmer station in Antarctica. Even Søndrestrøm station, which has a more limited range, covers approximately 15% of the globe. The signal to noise ratio along with the location of the station is critical in determining the global coverage of that station. Irrespective of the station used, we can locate lightning from roughly 70% of the sferics recorded. Some recorded sferics cannot be used due to interference from other sferics, with overlapping slow tails. As might be expected, these interfering sferics are especially common during active storms which have a large number of lightning occurring in close proximity with one another. However, these storms can still be tracked using the single station method with the remaining clean sferics. The single station method can be applied to sferics originating from positive or negative lightning, and propagating day or night, with distances varying from 2000 km up to km. Approximately half the world can be covered by a single station and a very small number of stations strategically placed can provide worldwide coverage. [29] Acknowledgments. This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research through grant N and grant N and by the National Science Foundation through grant ANT Logistics support for the Søndrestrømfjord measurements was provided by the National Science Foundation through grant ATM The authors thank Vaisala, Inc. for providing the NLDN data used in this study. We would also like to thank Ryan Said for providing the ELF/VLF data from Palmer Station. References Brundell, J. B., C. J. Rodger, and R. L. Dowden (2002), Validation of single station lightning location technique, Radio Sci., 37(4), 1059, doi: /2001rs Burke, C. P., and D. L. Jones (1995), Global radiolocation in the lower ELF frequency band, J. Geophys. Res., 100(D12), 26,263 26,271, doi: /95jd Chevalier, T. W., U. S. Inan, and T. F. Bell (2006), Characterization of terminal impedance and radiation properties of a horizontal VLF antenna over Antarctic ice, Radio Sci., 41, RS6001, doi: /2005rs Christian, H. J. (1999), Optical detection of lightning from space, paper presented at 11th International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, Global Hydrol. and Clim. Cent., Guntersville, Ala., 7 11 June. Cummins, K. L., M. J. Murphy, E. A. Bardo, W. L. Hiscox, R. B. Pyle, and A. E. Pifer (1998), A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D8), , doi: /98jd Dowden, R. L., J. B. Brundell, and C. J. Rodger (2002), VLF lightning location by time of group arrival (TOGA) at multiple sites, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 64, , doi: /s (02) Füllekrug, M., and S. Constable (2000), Global triangulation of intense lightning discharges, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(3), , doi: / 1999GL Lee, A. C. L. (1986), An operational system for the remote location of lightning flashes using a VLF arrival time difference technique, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3, Mackay, C., and A. C. Fraser Smith (2010), Lightning location using the slow tails of sferics, Radio Sci., 45, RS5010, doi: / 2010RS Mackerras, D., M. Darveniza, R. E. Orville, E. R. Williams, and S. J. Goodman (1998), Global lightning: Total, cloud and ground flash estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D16), 19,791 19,809. Rafalsky, V. A., A. P. Nickolaenko, A. V. Shvets, and M. Hayakawa (1995a), Location of lightning discharges from a single station, J. Geophys. Res., 100(D10), 20,829 20,838. Rafalsky, V. A., A. V. Shvets, and M. Hayakawa (1995b), One site distance finding technique for locating lightning discharges, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 57(11), , doi: / (95)00011-p. Rakov, V. A., and M. A. Uman (2003), Lightning: Physics and Effects, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Rogers, J., and I. Peden (1975), The VLF complex permittivity of deep Antarctic ice measured in situ, Radio Sci., 10(8, 9), Said, R. K., U. S. Inan, and K. L. Cummins (2010), Long range lightning geo location using a VLF radio atmospheric waveform bank, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23108, doi: /2010jd Thomas, R. J., P. R. Krehbiel, W. Rison, T. Hamlin, D. J. Boccippio, S. J. Goodman, and H. J. Christian (2000), Comparison of ground based 3 dimensional lightning mapping observations with satellite based LIS observations in Oklahoma, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(12), , doi: /1999gl Wait, J. R. (1960a), On the theory of the slow tail portion of atmospheric waveforms, J. Geophys. Res., 65, Wait, J. R. (1960b), Terrestrial propagation of very low frequency radio waves: A theoretical investigation, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. D, 64(2), A. C. Fraser Smith and C. Mackay, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 350 Serra Mall, David Packard Bldg., Stanford, CA 94305, USA. (acfs@stanford.edu; cisou@stanford.edu) 9of9
Long-range tracking of thunderstorms using sferic measurements
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. D21, 4553, doi:10.1029/2001jd002008, 2002 Long-range tracking of thunderstorms using sferic measurements T. G. Wood and U. S. Inan STAR Laboratory, Stanford
More informationAzimuthal dependence of VLF propagation
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SPACE PHYSICS, VOL. 118, 1 5, doi:.0/jgra.533, 013 Azimuthal dependence of VLF propagation M. L. Hutchins, 1 Abram R. Jacobson, 1 Robert H. Holzworth, 1 and James B. Brundell
More informationData Analysis for Lightning Electromagnetics
Data Analysis for Lightning Electromagnetics Darwin Goei, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor: Steven A. Cummer, Assistant Professor Abstract Two projects were conducted in my independent
More informationValidation of single-station lightning location technique
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 37, NO. 4, 10.1029/2001RS002477, 2002 Validation of single-station lightning location technique James B. Brundell, Craig J. Rodger, 1 and Richard L. Dowden Low Frequency Electromagnetic
More informationDaytime modelling of VLF radio waves over land and sea, comparison with data from DEMETER Satellite
Daytime modelling of VLF radio waves over land and sea, comparison with data from DEMETER Satellite S. G. Meyer 1,2, A. B. Collier 1,2, C. J. Rodger 3 1 SANSA Space Science, Hermanus, South Africa 2 School
More informationMethod to Improve Location Accuracy of the GLD360
Method to Improve Location Accuracy of the GLD360 Ryan Said Vaisala, Inc. Boulder Operations 194 South Taylor Avenue, Louisville, CO, USA ryan.said@vaisala.com Amitabh Nag Vaisala, Inc. Boulder Operations
More informationSferic signals for lightning sourced electromagnetic surveys
Sferic signals for lightning sourced electromagnetic surveys Lachlan Hennessy* RMIT University hennessylachlan@gmail.com James Macnae RMIT University *presenting author SUMMARY Lightning strikes generate
More informationLightning stroke distance estimation from single station observation and validation with WWLLN data
Ann. Geophys., 5, 59 57, 7 www.ann-geophys.net/5/59/7/ European Geosciences Union 7 Annales Geophysicae Lightning stroke distance estimation from single station observation and validation with WWLLN data
More informationNON-TYPICAL SERIES OF QUASI-PERIODIC VLF EMISSIONS
NON-TYPICAL SERIES OF QUASI-PERIODIC VLF EMISSIONS J. Manninen 1, N. Kleimenova 2, O. Kozyreva 2 1 Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, Finland, e-mail: jyrki.manninen@sgo.fi; 2 Institute of Physics of the
More informationObserving Lightning Around the Globe from the Surface
Observing Lightning Around the Globe from the Surface Catherine Gaffard 1, John Nash 1, Nigel Atkinson 1, Alec Bennett 1, Greg Callaghan 1, Eric Hibbett 1, Paul Taylor 1, Myles Turp 1, Wolfgang Schulz
More informationAn Update on the Performance Characteristics of the NLDN
An Update on the Performance Characteristics of the NLDN S. Mallick, V.A. Rakov, T. Ngin, W.R. Gamerota, J.T. Pilkey, J.D. Hill*, M.A. Uman, D.M. Jordan Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
More informationThe effective antenna noise figure F a for a vertical loop antenna and its application to extremely low frequency/very low frequency atmospheric noise
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 4,, doi:10.109/005rs003387, 007 The effective antenna noise figure F a for a vertical loop antenna and its application to extremely low frequency/very low frequency atmospheric noise
More informationLightning stroke distance estimation from single station observation and validation with WWLLN data
Lightning stroke distance estimation from single station observation and validation with WWLLN data V. Ramachandran, J. N. Prakash, A. Deo, S. Kumar To cite this version: V. Ramachandran, J. N. Prakash,
More informationA Global Survey of ELF/VLF Radio Noise
A Global Survey of ELF/VLF Radio Noise Antony Fraser-Smith Space, Telecommunications and Radioscience Laboratory Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-9515 phone: (650) 723-3684 fax: (650) 723-9251 email:
More informationV-shaped VLF streaks recorded on DEMETER above powerful thunderstorms
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2008ja013336, 2008 V-shaped VLF streaks recorded on DEMETER above powerful thunderstorms M. Parrot, 1,2 U. S. Inan, 3
More informationEarly VLF perturbations caused by lightning EMP-driven dissociative attachment
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 35, L21807, doi:10.1029/2008gl035358, 2008 Early VLF perturbations caused by lightning EMP-driven dissociative attachment R. A. Marshall, 1 U. S. Inan, 1 and T. W. Chevalier
More informationDaytime ionospheric D region sharpness derived from VLF radio atmospherics
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 116,, doi:10.1029/2010ja016299, 2011 Daytime ionospheric D region sharpness derived from VLF radio atmospherics Feng Han, 1 Steven A. Cummer, 1 Jingbo Li, 1 and Gaopeng
More informationCharacterization of terminal impedance and radiation properties of a horizontal VLF antenna over Antarctic ice
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 41,, doi:10.1029/2005rs003298, 2006 Characterization of terminal impedance and radiation properties of a horizontal VLF antenna over Antarctic ice T. W. Chevalier, 1 U. S. Inan, 1 and
More informationThe Effect of Changes in Lightning Waveform Propagation Characteristics on the UK Met Office Long Range Lightning Location Network (ATDnet)
The Effect of Changes in Lightning Waveform Propagation Characteristics on the UK Met Office Long Range Lightning Location Network (ATDnet) Alec Bennett 1, Greg Callaghan, Catherine Gaffard, John Nash
More informationAbstract. Introduction
Subionospheric VLF measurements of the effects of geomagnetic storms on the mid-latitude D-region W. B. Peter, M. Chevalier, and U. S. Inan Stanford University, 350 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 Abstract
More informationBroadband VHF Interferometry within the Kennedy Space Center Lightning Mapping Array
Broadband VHF Interferometry within the Kennedy Space Center Lightning Mapping Array Mark A. Stanley, William Rison, Paul R. Krehbiel Julia Tilles, Ningyu Liu Langmuir Laboratory New Mexico Tech Socorro,
More informationMatching and Locating of Cloud to Ground Lightning Discharges
Charles Wang Duke University Class of 05 ECE/CPS Pratt Fellow Matching and Locating of Cloud to Ground Lightning Discharges Advisor: Prof. Steven Cummer I: Introduction When a lightning discharge occurs
More informationDesign of leaky coaxial cables with periodic slots
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 37, NO. 5, 1069, doi:10.1029/2000rs002534, 2002 Design of leaky coaxial cables with periodic slots Jun Hong Wang 1 and Kenneth K. Mei Department of Electronic Engineering, City University
More informationRECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Prediction of sky-wave field strength at frequencies between about 150 and khz
Rec. ITU-R P.1147-2 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.1147-2 Prediction of sky-wave field strength at frequencies between about 150 and 1 700 khz (Question ITU-R 225/3) (1995-1999-2003) The ITU Radiocommunication
More informationPropagation Effects of Ground and Ionosphere on Electromagnetic Waves Generated By Oblique Return Stroke
International Journal of Engineering Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 6734, ISSN (Print): 2319 6726 Volume 2 Issue 4 ǁ April. 2013 ǁ PP.43-51 Propagation Effects of Ground and Ionosphere on Electromagnetic
More informationCOMPACT INTRACLOUD DISCHARGES: ON ESTIMATION OF PEAK CURRENTS FROM MEASURED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
COMPACT INTRACLOUD DISCHARGES: ON ESTIMATION OF PEAK CURRENTS FROM MEASURED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS Amitabh Nag 1, Vladimir A. Rakov 1, and John A. Cramer 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Computer Science 45 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Computer Science 45 (2015 ) 661 670 International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications (ICACTA- 2015) Designing
More informationDevelopment Progress of Dual-band Lightning Locating System
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China Development Progress of Dual-band Lightning Locating System Wansheng Dong, Hengyi Liu Laboratory of Lightning Physics and Protection
More informationPaper presented at the Int. Lightning Detection Conference, Tucson, Nov. 1996
Paper presented at the Int. Lightning Detection Conference, Tucson, Nov. 1996 Detection Efficiency and Site Errors of Lightning Location Systems Schulz W. Diendorfer G. Austrian Lightning Detection and
More informationResearch Letter Waveguide Parameters of 19.8 khz Signal Propagating over a Long Path
Research Letters in Physics Volume 29, Article ID 216373, 4 pages doi:1.1155/29/216373 Research Letter Waveguide Parameters of 19.8 khz Signal Propagating over a Long Path Sushil Kumar School of Engineering
More information-149- MICROSECOND-SCALE ELECTRIC FIELD PULSES IN CLOUD LIGHTNING FLASHES
-149-30F3 MICROSECOND-SCALE ELECTRIC FIELD PULSES IN CLOUD LIGHTNING FLASHES Y. Villanueva, V.A. Rakov, M.A. Uman Electrical Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida M. Brook
More informationReturn Stroke VLF Electromagnetic Wave of Oblique Lightning Channel
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 4, April 2013 1 Return Stroke VLF Electromagnetic Wave of Oblique Lightning Channel Mahendra Singh Department of Physics,
More informationModeling ELF radio atmospheric propagation and extracting lightning currents from ELF observations
Published in Radio Science, 35, 385 394, March April 2. Copyright 2 by the Americal Geophysical Union. Further distribution is not allowed. Modeling ELF radio atmospheric propagation and extracting lightning
More informationLocation accuracy of VLF World-Wide Lightning Location (WWLL) network: Post-algorithm upgrade
Annales Geophysicae (2005) 23: 277 290 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2005-23-277 European Geosciences Union 2005 Annales Geophysicae Location accuracy of VLF World-Wide Lightning Location (WWLL) network: Post-algorithm
More informationIonospheric Absorption
Ionospheric Absorption Prepared by Forrest Foust Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME Network VLF Injection Into the Magnetosphere Earth-based VLF
More informationVery low frequency sferic bursts, sprites, and their association with lightning activity
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112,, doi:10.1029/2007jd008857, 2007 Very low frequency sferic bursts, sprites, and their association with lightning activity R. A. Marshall,
More informationLocation accuracy of long distance VLF lightning location network
Annales Geophysicae (2004) 22: 747 758 SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2004-22-747 European Geosciences Union 2004 Annales Geophysicae Location accuracy of long distance VLF lightning location network C. J. Rodger
More informationNighttime D-region equivalent electron density determined from tweek sferics observed in the South Pacific Region
Earth Planets Space, 61, 905 911, 2009 Nighttime D-region equivalent electron density determined from tweek sferics observed in the South Pacific Region Sushil Kumar 1, Anil Deo 2, and V. Ramachandran
More informationNUMERICAL MODELING OF MULTIMODE TWEEK-ATMOSPHERICS IN THE EARTH-IONOSPHERE WAVEGUIDE
ISSN 60 (Print), ISSN (Online) безпека на залізничному транспорті, 0, 8 УДК 0.88. T. M. SERDYUK cand. tech. sc., associate prof., Dnepropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after akad.
More informationExpanding the Frequency Resolution of TOA Analysis Applied to ELF/VLF Wave Generation Experiments at HAARP
Expanding the Frequency Resolution of TOA Analysis Applied to ELF/VLF Wave Generation Experiments at HAARP J. Ruddle and R. C. Moore Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida,
More informationEstimation of Lightning Location from Single Station Observations of Sferics
Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 1, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2007 Translated from Denshi Joho Tsushin Gakkai Ronbunshi, Vol. J89-B, No. 1, January 2006, pp. 22 29 Estimation of Lightning Location from
More informationElectric and magnetic fields and field derivatives from lightning stepped leaders and first return strokes measured at distances from 100 to 1000 m
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2008jd010171, 2008 Electric and magnetic fields and field derivatives from lightning stepped leaders and first return strokes measured at distances
More informationChapter 2 Analysis of Polar Ionospheric Scintillation Characteristics Based on GPS Data
Chapter 2 Analysis of Polar Ionospheric Scintillation Characteristics Based on GPS Data Lijing Pan and Ping Yin Abstract Ionospheric scintillation is one of the important factors that affect the performance
More informationA new VLF/LF atmospheric noise model
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 42,, doi:10.1029/2006rs003513, 2007 A new VLF/LF atmospheric noise model S. Fieve, 1,2 P. Portala, 1,3 and L. Bertel 4 Received 8 April 2006; accepted 23 January 2007; published 30
More informationRelative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 47,, doi:10.1029/2012rs005049, 2012 Relative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network M. L. Hutchins, 1 R. H. Holzworth, 1 J. B. Brundell, 2 and C. J. Rodger
More informationMesospheric sprite current triangulation
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 106, NO. D17, PAGES 20,189-20,194, SEPTEMBER 16, 2001 Mesospheric sprite current triangulation Martin Fiillekrug, 1 Dana R. Moudry, 2 Graham Dawes, 3 and Davis D.
More informationStudy of the Ionosphere Irregularities Caused by Space Weather Activity on the Base of GNSS Measurements
Study of the Ionosphere Irregularities Caused by Space Weather Activity on the Base of GNSS Measurements Iu. Cherniak 1, I. Zakharenkova 1,2, A. Krankowski 1 1 Space Radio Research Center,, University
More informationSome studies of solar flare effects on the propagation of sferics and a transmitted signal
Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics Vol. 38, October 2009, pp. 260-265 Some studies of solar flare effects on the propagation of sferics and a transmitted signal B K De 1, S S De 2,*, B Bandyopadhyay
More informationLightning Observatory in Gainesville (LOG), Florida: A Review of Recent Results
2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Vienna, Austria Lightning Observatory in Gainesville (LOG), Florida: A Review of Recent Results V.A. Rakov, S. Mallick, and A. Nag 1 Department
More informationVLF & ULF Signals, Receivers & Antennas - Listening to the sounds of the atmosphere
VLF & ULF Signals, Receivers & Antennas - Listening to the sounds of the atmosphere A presentation to Manly-Warringah Radio Society from Geoff Osborne VK2TGO VLF & ULF Signals, Receivers and Antennas 1.
More informationCharacteristics of a Negative Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Discharge Based on Locations of VHF Radiation Sources
ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, VOL. 7, NO. 3, 248 253 Characteristics of a Negative Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Discharge Based on Locations of VHF Radiation Sources SUN Zhu-Ling 1, 2, QIE
More informationChapter 1 Introduction
Wireless Information Transmission System Lab. Chapter 1 Introduction National Sun Yat-sen University Table of Contents Elements of a Digital Communication System Communication Channels and Their Wire-line
More informationC4: Collaborative Work on Novel Approaches to ELF/VLF Generation
C4: Collaborative Work on Novel Approaches to ELF/VLF Generation Mark Golkowski University of Colorado Denver Robb Moore, Umran Inan, Morris Cohen, Ray Ingram, Tom Lee, Ed Kennedy, Paul Kossey C4: Collaborative
More informationSpacecraft observations of electromagnetic perturbations connected with seismic activity
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 35, L05109, doi:10.1029/2007gl032517, 2008 Spacecraft observations of electromagnetic perturbations connected with seismic activity F. Němec, 1,2,3 O. Santolík, 3,4 M.
More informationDependence of Some Features of VLF Sferics on Source and Propagation Parameters
Bulg. J. Phys. 37 (2010) 24 36 Dependence of Some Features of VLF Sferics on Source and Propagation Parameters B.K. De 1, S. Debnath 1, P. Pal 1, S.S. De 2, B. Bandyopadhyay 2, A. Bhowmick 1, S. Paul 2,
More informationElectric Field Reversal in Sprite Electric Field Signature
MAY 2013 S O N N E N F E L D A N D HAGER 1731 Electric Field Reversal in Sprite Electric Field Signature RICHARD G. SONNENFELD Langmuir Laboratory and Physics Department, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF SMALL NEGATIVE LIGHTNING REPORTS AT THE KSC-ER
CLASSIFICATION OF SMALL NEGATIVE LIGHTNING REPORTS AT THE KSC-ER *Jennifer G. Ward, 1,2 Kenneth L. Cummins 1,3 and E. Philip Krider 1 1 Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson,
More informationEUCLID NETWORK PERFORMANCE AND DATA ANALYSIS
32 EUCLID NETWORK PERFORMANCE AND DATA ANALYSIS Wolfgang, Gerhard Diendorfer Austrian Lightning Detection & Information System (ALDIS) Vienna, Austria 1. INTRODUCTION Currently in almost every country
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW ELF/VLF RECEIVER FOR DETECTING THE SUDDEN IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCES
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW ELF/VLF RECEIVER FOR DETECTING THE SUDDEN IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCES Le MINH TAN 1, Keyvan GHANBARI 2 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, Tay Nguyen
More informationRelationship between median intensities of electromagnetic emissions in the VLF range and lightning activity
Relationship between median intensities of electromagnetic emissions in the VLF range and lightning activity F Němec, O Santolík, Michel Parrot, C.J. Rodger To cite this version: F Němec, O Santolík, Michel
More informationMidlatitude daytime D region ionosphere variations measured from radio atmospherics
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2010ja015715, 2010 Midlatitude daytime D region ionosphere variations measured from radio atmospherics Feng Han 1 and Steven A. Cummer 1 Received
More informationCompact intracloud lightning discharges: 1. Mechanism of electromagnetic radiation and modeling
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2010jd014235, 2010 Compact intracloud lightning discharges: 1. Mechanism of electromagnetic radiation and modeling Amitabh Nag 1 and Vladimir A.
More informationAnalytical description of ELF transients produced by cloud to ground lightning discharges
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:1.129/29jd1333, 21 Analytical description of ELF transients produced by cloud to ground lightning discharges A. Kułak, 1,2 Z. Nieckarz, 3 and S. Zięba 2
More informationExperimental Observations of ELF/VLF Wave Generation Using Optimized Beam-Painting
Experimental Observations of ELF/VLF Wave Generation Using Optimized Beam-Painting R. C. Moore Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Abstract Observations
More informationAsymmetric V shaped streaks recorded on board DEMETER satellite above powerful thunderstorms
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 116,, doi:10.1029/2011ja016794, 2011 Asymmetric V shaped streaks recorded on board DEMETER satellite above powerful thunderstorms F. El Lemdani Mazouz, 1 J. L. Pincon,
More informationPenetration of VLF Radio Waves through the Ionosphere
Penetration of VLF Radio Waves through the Ionosphere By Ken-ichi MAEDA and Hiroshi OYA Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (Read May 24; Received November 25, 1962) Abstract The rate of energy penetration
More informationLOCATION ACCURACY EVALUTION OF THE AUSTRIAN LIGHTNING LOCATION SYSTEMS ALDIS
LOCATION ACCURACY EVALUTION OF THE AUSTRIAN LIGHTNING LOCATION SYSTEMS ALDIS W. Schulz 1, C. Vergeiner 2, H. Pichler 1, G. Diendorfer 1, K. Cummins 3 1 OVE-ALDIS, Vienna, Austria 2 Institute of High Voltage
More informationModels of ionospheric VLF absorption of powerful ground based transmitters
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 39,, doi:10.1029/2012gl054437, 2012 Models of ionospheric VLF absorption of powerful ground based transmitters M. B. Cohen, 1 N. G. Lehtinen, 1 and U. S. Inan 1,2 Received
More informationSw earth Dw Direct wave GRw Ground reflected wave Sw Surface wave
WAVE PROPAGATION By Marcel H. De Canck, ON5AU Electromagnetic radio waves can propagate in three different ways between the transmitter and the receiver. 1- Ground waves 2- Troposphere waves 3- Sky waves
More informationNighttime sporadic E measurements on an oblique path along the midlatitude trough
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 46,, doi:10.1029/2010rs004507, 2011 Nighttime sporadic E measurements on an oblique path along the midlatitude trough A. J. Stocker 1 and E. M. Warrington 1 Received 25 August 2010;
More informationModeling and Subionospheric VLF perturbations caused by direct and indirect effects of lightning
Modeling and Subionospheric VLF perturbations caused by direct and indirect effects of lightning Prepared by Benjamin Cotts Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global
More informationAn enhancement of the ionospheric sporadic-e layer in response to negative polarity cloud-to-ground lightning
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 35, L05815, doi:10.1029/2007gl031909, 2008 An enhancement of the ionospheric sporadic-e layer in response to negative polarity cloud-to-ground lightning C. J. Davis 1
More informationEvaluation for the performance of the Guangdong- Hongkong-Macau Lightning Location System
Evaluation for the performance the Guangdong- Hongkong-Macau Lightning Location System Yijun Zhang, Weitao Lu, Yang Zhang, Dong Zheng Laboratory Lightning Physics and Protection Engineering, Chinese Academy
More informationTesting sprite initiation theory using lightning measurements and modeled electromagnetic fields
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112,, doi:10.1029/2006jd007939, 2007 Testing sprite initiation theory using lightning measurements and modeled electromagnetic fields W. Hu, 1 S. A. Cummer, 1 and
More informationLightning observations and consideration of positive charge distribution inside thunderclouds using VHF broadband digital interferometry
Atmospheric Research 76 (2005) 445 454 www.elsevier.com/locate/atmos Lightning observations and consideration of positive charge distribution inside thunderclouds using VHF broadband digital interferometry
More informationIonospheric effects of whistler waves from rocket-triggered lightning
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 38,, doi:10.1029/2011gl049869, 2011 Ionospheric effects of whistler waves from rocket-triggered lightning B. R. T. Cotts, 1 M. Gołkowski, 1 and R. C. Moore 2 Received
More informationThe relationship between median intensities of electromagnetic emissions in the VLF range and lightning activity
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL.???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/, The relationship between median intensities of electromagnetic emissions in the VLF range and lightning activity F. Němec 1,2,3, O. Santolík
More informationUNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?
UNIT 8 1. Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation? Fundamental Equation for Free Space Propagation Consider the transmitter power (P t ) radiated uniformly in all the directions (isotropic),
More informationHigh time resolution observations of HF cross-modulation within the D region ionosphere
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 4, 1912 1916, doi:1.12/grl.5391, 213 High time resolution observations of HF cross-modulation within the D region ionosphere J. Langston 1 andr.c.moore 1 Received 17
More informationThe GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000
Advances in Space Research 36 (2005) 2465 2469 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr The GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000 Weixing Wan a, *, Libo Liu a, Hong Yuan b, Baiqi
More informationA Study on the Terminator Times for the Signal of Khz Transmitted From Crimrod, UK Received at Kiel Lonwave Monitor, Germany
International Journal of Recent Research and Review, Vol. IX, Issue 4, December 2016 ISSN 2277 8322 A Study on the Terminator Times for the Signal of 52.10 Khz Transmitted From Crimrod, UK Received at
More informationRec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *
Rec. ITU-R P.682-1 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.682-1 * PROPAGATION DATA REQUIRED FOR THE DESIGN OF EARTH-SPACE AERONAUTICAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (Question ITU-R 207/3) Rec. 682-1 (1990-1992) The
More informationCONSTRUCTING A LOW-COST ELF/VLF REMOTE SENSING TO OBSERVE TWEEK SFERICS GENERATED BY LIGHTNING DISCHARGES
CONSTRUCTING A LOW-COST ELF/VLF REMOTE SENSING TO OBSERVE TWEEK SFERICS GENERATED BY LIGHTNING DISCHARGES Le MINH TAN, Marjan MARBOUTI and Keyvan GHANBARI Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Science
More informationModern Navigation. Thomas Herring
12.215 Modern Navigation Thomas Herring Summary of Last class Finish up some aspects of estimation Propagation of variances for derived quantities Sequential estimation Error ellipses Discuss correlations:
More information1. Terrestrial propagation
Rec. ITU-R P.844-1 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.844-1 * IONOSPHERIC FACTORS AFFECTING FREQUENCY SHARING IN THE VHF AND UHF BANDS (30 MHz-3 GHz) (Question ITU-R 218/3) (1992-1994) Rec. ITU-R PI.844-1 The ITU
More informationThe Global Atmospheric Electric Circuit
The Global Atmospheric Electric Circuit Colin Price Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences Tel Aviv University Israel cprice@flash.tau.ac.il Historical Background 1752 Lemonnier discovered that
More informationOptical observations geomagnetically conjugate to sprite-producing lightning discharges
Annales Geophysicae, 3, 3 37, SRef-ID: 43-76/ag/-3-3 European Geosciences Union Annales Geophysicae Optical observations geomagnetically conjugate to sprite-producing lightning discharges R. A. Marshall,
More informationJOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY VOL. 21, N0. 1, Schumann Resonances and Worldwide Thunderstorm Activity
JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY VOL. 21, N0. 1, 1969 Schumann Resonances and Worldwide Thunderstorm Activity Diurnal Variations of the Resonant Power of Natural Noises in the Earth-Ionosphere
More informationTHE THIRD GENERATION RELATIVE DETECTION EFFICIENCY MODEL FOR THE BRAZILIAN LIGHTNING DETECTION NETWORK (BRASILDAT)
THE THIRD GENERATION RELATIVE DETECTION EFFICIENCY MODEL FOR THE BRAZILIAN LIGHTNING DETECTION NETWORK (BRASILDAT) K. P. Naccarato; O. Pinto Jr. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) Sao Jose
More informationOn phenomenology of compact intracloud lightning discharges
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2009jd012957, 2010 On phenomenology of compact intracloud lightning discharges Amitabh Nag, 1 Vladimir A. Rakov, 1 Dimitris
More informationPRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION BY A WAVELET TRANSFORM
PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ACOUSTIC EMISSION SOURCE LOCATION BY A WAVELET TRANSFORM Abstract M. A. HAMSTAD 1,2, K. S. DOWNS 3 and A. O GALLAGHER 1 1 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials
More informationRec. ITU-R F RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *
Rec. ITU-R F.162-3 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.162-3 * Rec. ITU-R F.162-3 USE OF DIRECTIONAL TRANSMITTING ANTENNAS IN THE FIXED SERVICE OPERATING IN BANDS BELOW ABOUT 30 MHz (Question 150/9) (1953-1956-1966-1970-1992)
More information# DEFINITIONS TERMS. 2) Electrical energy that has escaped into free space. Electromagnetic wave
CHAPTER 14 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE PROPAGATION # DEFINITIONS TERMS 1) Propagation of electromagnetic waves often called radio-frequency (RF) propagation or simply radio propagation. Free-space 2) Electrical
More informationA technique for calculating ionospheric Doppler shifts from standard ionograms suitable for scientific, HF communication, and OTH radar applications
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 44,, doi:10.1029/2009rs004210, 2009 A technique for calculating ionospheric Doppler shifts from standard ionograms suitable for scientific, HF communication, and OTH radar applications
More informationREMOTE SENSING OF THE ELECTRODYNAMIC COUPLING BETWEEN THUNDERSTORM SYSTEMS AND THE MESOSPHERE / LOWER IONOSPHERE
REMOTE SENSING OF THE ELECTRODYNAMIC COUPLING BETWEEN THUNDERSTORM SYSTEMS AND THE MESOSPHERE / LOWER IONOSPHERE a dissertation submitted to the department of electrical engineering and the committee on
More informationIonospheric D region remote sensing using VLF radio atmospherics
Published in Radio Science, 33, 78 79, November December 998. Copyright 998 by the Americal Geophysical Union. Further distribution is not allowed. Ionospheric D region remote sensing using VLF radio atmospherics
More informationHF signatures of powerful lightning recorded on DEMETER
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2008ja013323, 2008 HF signatures of powerful lightning recorded on DEMETER M. Parrot, 1,2 U. Inan, 3 N. Lehtinen, 3 E. Blanc, 4 and J. L. Pinçon
More informationLIGHTNING measurements have been widely used by
32 IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, JANUARY 2007 Evaluation of Peak Current Polarity Retrieved by the ZEUS Long-Range Lightning Monitoring System Carlos A. Morales, Emmanouil
More informationLocation Accuracy Improvements using Propagation Corrections: A Case Study of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network
Location Accuracy Improvements using Propagation Corrections: A Case Study of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network K. L. Cummins 1,2, M.J. Murphy 1, J. A. Cramer 1, W. Scheftic 2, N. Demetriades
More informationOutlines. Attenuation due to Atmospheric Gases Rain attenuation Depolarization Scintillations Effect. Introduction
PROPAGATION EFFECTS Outlines 2 Introduction Attenuation due to Atmospheric Gases Rain attenuation Depolarization Scintillations Effect 27-Nov-16 Networks and Communication Department Loss statistics encountered
More information