Image Quality Artifacts in Digital Imaging

Transcription

1 MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY Wisdom of the Land Image Quality Artifacts in Digital Imaging Napapong Pongnapang, Ph.D. Department of Radiological Technology Faculty of Medical Technology Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

2 Content Image Quality Image artifacts Types of CR artifacts Types of DR artifacts

3 Image quality Contrast-to- Noise Ratio (CNR) Noise Contrast-detail Analysis Rose Model Wiener Spectra Contrast ROC Analysis Resolution Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) Hasegawa BH, The Physics of Medical X-ray Imaging, 2nd Ed, 1991.

4 Contrast - The difference in image brightness between areas in the radiography. S2 S6 S5 S8 S3 S1 S4 S7

5 Contrast C A B A ( 100%) -OD in screen/film -Pixel values in DR

6 Scatter reduces contrast S S C ( A S) ( B ( A S) S) A A B S

7 Spatial resolution - The smallest distance that 2 objects can be separated and still appear distinct. Large focal spot Small focal spot

8 Noise - The uncertainty or imprecision with which a signal is recorded. s 5% contrast, 1% noise 5% contrast, 3% noise

9 Quantum Noise Although the average number of x-rays interacting in the screen may be constant across the field (a uniform beam). The actual number interacting in any given small area will obey a statistical law called the POISSON DISTRIBUTION. (doesn t have to do with quantum mechanics, but with the fact that x-rays come as individual photons or quanta)

10 The Signal-to-Noise Ratio: A Way to Quantify Noise If the signal is composed of N photons and if the noise is given by s = sqrt(n), then the signal-to-noise ratio is given by SNR = signal/noise = N/sqrt(N) = sqrt(n) SNR is the inverse of the fractional noise (noise/signal) Bigger SNR is better (within dose constraints).

11 Poisson Statistics: Raindrops Analogy sprinkle shower downpour low dose medium dose high dose N = s = SNR =

12 Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) - Low contrast detectibility can be directly related to CNR. - CNR is proportional to SNR, or square-root of NEQ (Noise equivalent quanta). CNR S s S S S s C SNR

13 Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) - The contrast produced by an imaging system as a function of the spatial frequency of the object or input signal. object psf image MTF( u) Output _ mod ulation ( u) Input _ mod ulation ( u) Modulation I I max max I I min min =

14 Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) - The efficiency for a detector system to use x- ray to generate images with adequate SNR. SNR in detector SNR out DQE SNR SNR out in 2

15 Artifacts and Digital Systems Artifacts are any fault impressions appear on the images Digital imaging produces different kinds of artifacts commonly found in conventional screen/film

16 Artifacts and Digital Systems Recognizing artifacts in digital radiograph can avoid misinterpreting those distracting patterns as pathological findings Can be generated from users who are not aware of proper imaging techniques or image processing selection

17 Classification of artifacts in digital imaging Hardware Software/Image processing Image display Operator error

18 Hardware Image Plate Image plate are susceptible for cracking Deterioration progress appears from the middle of the plate Debris that blocks IP emission of light when scanning with laser will make image appear bright at the site Back-scatter can also produce artifacts due to high sensitivity to scatter radiation of the IP

19 Image plate artifact Residue from adhesive tape used to attach lead markers to the outside of the cassette

20 Image plate artifact CRACK OF THE IP: Image shows artifacts appears in anatomical region

21 Image plate artifact Static caused a hair to cling to the IP on this skull image.

22 CR Artifacts Crack in IP : looks like a foreign body L J CESAR, et al BJR 74 (2001)

23 Image plate artifact Debris from IP crack: Normally radiologist can tolerate, sometimes confusing with foreign bodies

24 Image plate artifact The dark line along the lateral portion of this upper abdomen is caused by backscatter transmitted through the back of the cassette. The line corresponds to the cassette hinge where the lead coating was weakened or cracked.

25 How to solve these problems from image plate artifacts Clean IP plate regularly Refer to vendor s recommendation regarding methods for cleaning Frequency of cleaning depends on the usage

26 Manufacterer s recommendation

27 Manufacturer s Recommendation

28 Manufacturer s Recommendation

29 Manufacturer s Recommendation

30 Hardware: Image reader Normally IPs are automatically reased after used IPs must be manually erased after not in use for a period of time For incorrect (intense) exposure, IPs should be erased with longer erasure cycle Incomplete erasure can produce artifacts

31 Plate reader artifacts The electronic board that controlled the photomultiplier tube was malfunctioned. Call in service engineer

32 Plate reader artifacts Dirt on the light-guide cause line artifact

33 Plate reader artifacts Plate reader artefact. This artifact occurred because the plate reader loaded two imaging plates (IPs) in a single cassette. After an exposure, the bottom IP was extracted, read and replaced as usual, leaving the top IP to be exposed numerous times. Artefact remedy: double-loaded cassettes will be discovered during routine IP cleaning. If a cassette containing two IPs is discovered, the IPs should be erased before being put back into use.

34 Plate reader artifacts Plate reader artefact. This bilateral knee image was spoiled when the incorrect erasure setting was used to eliminate a previous femur image. Evidence of this is the residual image of the lead marker in the top corner of the image, the tissue line from the previous image (upper arrow) and the additional line of collimation along the bottom of the image (lower arrow). Artefact remedy: radiographers must select the correct erasure setting according to the type of exposure that has occurred.

35 Erasure Cycle

36 Erasure Cycle

37 Image processing Proper image processing should be employed to avoid appearance of artifacts Keep in mind that we cannot create anything that is not part of the patient Image processing cannot correct for everything!

38 Image processing artifacts

39 Image processing artifacts Inadequate image processing Mismatch technique/post processing

40 Image processing artifacts

41 Image processing artifacts

42 Image processing artifacts

43 Image processing artifacts

44 Image Display: Laser printer artifact

45 Operator Error Artifacts Radiographers can create artifacts Care should be taken when working with CR Learning about patterns of artifacts and remedy are encouraged

46 Operator error

47 Operator error

48 Operator error

49 Operator error

50 Operator error

51 Operator error

52 Other types

53 Other types

54 Other types

55 Other types

56 Other types

57 To avoid artifacts in CR Aware of cause of artifacts Learn about appearance of different artifact types Clean your IP Make sure service people come in regularly

58 What about DR?

59 Characteristics of Direct capture systems + Rapid acquisition and processing + Typically integrated with x-ray generator + No mechanical scan mechanism High initial capital investment Challenging manufacturing processes Limited systems for bedside radiography? Brief history of clinical operation? Life cycle issues unknown (durability?)? Image rendering unknown? Exposure factor issues Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology Courtesy JA Seibert, UC-Davis L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 59

60 What was the previous view All DR systems are subject to ghosting and/or lag Lag is effective increase in dark current (offset) Ghosting is a change in detector sensitivity (gain) a-se = reduction CsI(Tl), a-si:h = increase acquired? Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 60

61 Uncorrected DR image is inherently non-uniform Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 61

62 Non-uniformities are corrected by flat-fielding Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 62

63 Chest image from a flat panel obtained at 75 kv (mistake, using abdomen protocol). More entrance dose and slight saturation Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 63

64 Chest image from a flat panel obtained at 75 kv (mistake, using abdomen protocol). More entrance dose and slight saturation Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 64

65 Raw vs. Corrected DR Image Bushberg, Seibert, Leidholdt, Boone The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging 2 nd Ed Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 65

66 Artifacts related to gain and offset correction GE DR Canon DR Willis CE et al. Appl Radiol , 2004 Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 66

67 Composition of image affects display processing Default Reprocessed Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 67

68 Gonadal shielding has drawbacks Ovary locations vary Shield may obscure clinical features Shield may interfere with automatic image processing Processed Unprocessed Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 68

69 Large patient covers entire detector (if there s no contrast in the raw image, there s not much image processing can do) Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 69

70 Was there a clinical necessity for this appliance? Would this have been any less of an error with conventional screen-film? Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 70

71 Summary DR systems are inherently non-uniform in two dimensions Proper correction of non-uniformity is critical to DR image quality Periodic correction is necessary DR systems are subject to lag and ghosting The composition of the DR image affects the outcome of digital image processing Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography 71

72 References Solomon SL, Jost RG, Glazer HS, et al. Artifacts in computed radiography. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157(1): Cesar LJ, Schueler BA, Zink FE, et al. Artefacts found in computed radiography. Brit J Radiol 2001; 74(878): N. Pongnapang. Practical guidelines for radiographers to improve computed radiography image quality. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2005; 1(2):e12 5 IAEA Digital Imaging Training Materials